Resolution of Board of Directors by Special Directorsとは 意味・読み方・使い方

Resolution of Board of Directors by Special Directors発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

特別取締役による取締役会の決議 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The person who is appointed by Special Directors from among themselves shall report without delay after the resolution of the board of directors under the preceding paragraph the content of such resolution to the directors other than the Special Directors.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

３　特別取締役の互選によって定められた者は、前項の取締役会の決議後、遅滞なく、当該決議の内容を特別取締役以外の取締役に報告しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 373 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 369(1), in cases where a Company with Board of Directors (excluding a Company with Committees) falls under all of the following requirements, the board of directors may provide to the effect that the resolution of the board of directors on the matters listed in item (i) and item (ii) of Article 362(4) may be made, where the majority (in cases where a higher proportion is determined by the board of directors, such proportion or more) of three or more directors appointed in advance (hereinafter in this Chapter referred to as "Special Directors") who are entitled to participate in the vote are present, by the majority (in cases where a higher proportion is determined by the board of directors, such proportion or more) of such directors present:発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第三百七十三条　第三百六十九条第一項の規定にかかわらず、取締役会設置会社（委員会設置会社を除く。）が次に掲げる要件のいずれにも該当する場合には、取締役会は、第三百六十二条第四項第一号及び第二号に掲げる事項についての取締役会の決議については、あらかじめ選定した三人以上の取締役（以下この章において「特別取締役」という。）のうち、議決に加わることができるものの過半数（これを上回る割合を取締役会で定めた場合にあっては、その割合以上）が出席し、その過半数（これを上回る割合を取締役会で定めた場合にあっては、その割合以上）をもって行うことができる旨を定めることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Under the Companies Act (CA), where the capital increase involves favorable terms being offered to the parties concerned, a special resolution at a shareholders' meeting is required; and if the issuance terms offered are extremely unfair to existing shareholders, the issuance becomes subject to an injunction. However, if third-party share issuance does not fall under either of these cases, it can be executed with only a resolution by the board of directors, without any direct involvement by shareholders, regardless of the degree by which their control would be diluted.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

我が国の会社法では、第三者割当増資について、有利発行に該当する場合には、株主総会の特別決議が必要であり、また著しく不公正な発行に該当する場合には、差止請求の対象となっているが、これらの場合に該当しない第三者割当増資については、支配比率の希釈化等の程度に関わらず、株主の直接の関与なく取締役会の決議のみによって行うことが可能となっている。 - 金融庁

Article 53-16 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, and Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5)) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the board of directors of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article with relevant changes in interpretation. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraphs (2) and (3) (Omission of Report to Board of Directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-13, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 417, paragraph (4)" in Article 372, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 417, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-30, paragraph (5) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 362, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii)" in Article 373, paragraphs (1) and (2) (Resolution of board of directors by special directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-14, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の十六　会社法第二編第四章第五節第二款（第三百六十七条並びに第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項を除く。）（運営）の規定は相互会社の取締役会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において読み替えて準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百七十一条第二項（議事録等）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項及び第三項（取締役会への報告の省略）中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十三第二項」と、同条第三項中「第四百十七条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十第五項において準用する第四百十七条第四項」と、同法第三百七十三条第一項及び第二項（特別取締役による取締役会の決議）中「第三百六十二条第四項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十四第四項第一号及び第二号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム