We own a few hundred acres between the three of us.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

我々３人で数百エーカーの土地を共有している。 - Tanaka Corpus

In addition, what was noted is that capital flow from the U.K., which forms one of the three poles, to Japan is growing at the same level as the flow between Europe and the U.S.例文帳に追加

また、三極の一つを形成する英国から日本への資本の流れが欧米間並みに大きくなっている点も注目される6。 - 経済産業省

Furthermore, from the viewpoint of the involvement of developing countries in trade in goods, the trade in goods involving developing countries during the same period which consists of the trade in goods among developing countries and that between developing countries and developed countries increased approximately seven times from US$0.9 trillion to US$6.1 trillion. This was a rapid increase compared to the approximately five times increase of the trade in goods among developing countries from US$0.9 trillion to US$4.1 trillion, and the difference in value between them have increased from an almost balanced situation to the proportion of approximately three to two (Figure 1-1-8).例文帳に追加

また、財貿易への発展途上国の関与の有無として見ても、同期間の発展途上国・先進国間及び発展途上国・発展途上国間を合わせた発展途上国が関与する財貿易は0.9 兆ドルから6.1 兆ドルへと約 7 倍となり、先進国・先進国間の財貿易が0.9 兆ドルから4.1 兆ドルへと約 5 倍の拡大であることと比べて急速な拡大となっており、規模もほぼ拮抗した状況からおおよそ3：2の比率の違いが生まれている（第1-1-8図）。 - 経済産業省

In addition, a look at the potential growth rate and the growth rate of the number of employees in time series in three countries (Japan, the U.S., and the U.K.) reveals a difference between the growth rate of the number of employees and the potential growth rate (see Figures 2-1-14 and 2-1-15).例文帳に追加

また、日本、米国、英国の3か国について潜在成長率と就業者数の成長率を時系列で見ると、就業者数の成長率の格差が潜在成長率の格差となって現れていることがうかがえる（第2-1-14図、第2-1-15図）。 - 経済産業省

Article 1105, paragraph 1 of NAFTA provides an obligation to accord fair and equitable treatment “in accordance with international law.” However, in the Pope and Talbot case it was held that because NAFTA was entered into for the purpose of building a closer economic relationship between the three countries of North America, there is not only an obligation to provide treatment consistent with the minimum standard under international law, but also obligations in addition to such minimum standard. In addition, in the S.D. Myers case it was held that a breach of other provisions under NAFTA automatically establishes a breach of general treatment obligations. Criticisms regarding the interpretation of this provision were raised mainly in the U.S. With a view to posing limitations on the expansive reading of this obligation, the NAFTA Free Trade Commission, in response to such criticisms, published “Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions” on August 1, 2001 confirming that general treatment obligations do not exceed that which is required by the customary international law minimum standard for treatment of aliens, and a breach of another provision of NAFTA, or of a separate international agreement, does not establish that there has been a breach of the general treatment obligations.例文帳に追加

なお、NAFTA 第1105条第１項は、「国際法に従って」公正衡平待遇を与える義務を規定しているが、Pope and Talbot 事件で、NAFTAが北米三国間により一層強固な経済関係を築く目的で締結されたものであることなどから一般国際法上の義務のみでなく、これに付加的なものであるとの判断が下されたこと、また、S.D.Myers事件ではNAFTA 上のこの他の規定に違反している場合、必然的に一般待遇義務にも違反するとの判断が下されたことから、米国を中心にこの規定の解釈について批判の声があがり、これを受ける形で2001年８ 月１ 日にNAFTA 自由貿易委員会（NAFTA FreeTrade Commission）は、公正衡平待遇義務は慣習国際法上の最低基準を付与するものであり、それ以上の待遇を求めるものではないこと、NAFTA 上又は他の国際協定の公正衡平待遇義務以外の義務違反があったことによって、公正衡平待遇義務違反があったこととはならないことを確認する覚書（Notes of Interpretationof Certain Chapter 11Provisions）を公表し、この義務の範囲に制限をかけた。 - 経済産業省