Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (3) of Article 312 of the Codeとは 意味・読み方・使い方

Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (3) of Article 312 of the Code; Article 315 of the Code発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

法第三百十二条第三項の上告理由の記載の方式・法第三百十五条 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 196 (1) If it is clear that the statements of all of the reasons for an appeal in a petition for a final appeal or a statement of the reasons for a final appeal that has been submitted within the period set forth in Article 194 (Period for Submission of Statement of Reasons for Final Appeal) are in violation of the provisions of Article 190 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (2) of Article 312 of the Code) or Article 191 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (3) of Article 312 of the Code), the court of prior instance shall issue an order specifying a reasonable period and stating that the defects be corrected within said period.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第百九十六条　上告状又は第百九十四条（上告理由書の提出期間）の期間内に提出した上告理由書における上告のすべての理由の記載が第百九十条（法第三百十二条第一項及び第二項の上告理由の記載の方式）又は第百九十一条（法第三百十二条第三項の上告理由の記載の方式）の規定に違反することが明らかなときは、原裁判所は、決定で、相当の期間を定め、その期間内に不備を補正すべきことを命じなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 186 (Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Appeal to Court of Second Instance), Article 187 (Prepayment of Expenses in Cases of Filing Final Appeal), Article 189 (Service of Written Notice of the Filing of Final Appeal) and Article 192 to the preceding Article (Indication of Precedents; Matter in Which Reasons for Final Appeal Should be Stated; Period for Submission of Statement of Reasons for Final Appeal; Number of Copies of Document Stating Reasons for Final Appeal; Order to Correct; Sending of Case to Final Appellate Court; and Service of Statement of Reasons for Final Appeal) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition for the acceptance of a final appeal. In this case, the term "written notice of the filing of a final appeal" in Article 187, Article 189 and Article 194 shall be deemed to be replaced with "written notice of a petition for the acceptance of a final appeal," the term "appellee of the final appeal" in paragraph (2) of Article 189, Article 195 and the preceding Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "opponent," and the phrase "Article 190 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (2) of Article 312 of the Code) or Article 191 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (3) of Article 312 of the Code)" in paragraph (1) of Article 196 shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1) of Article 199 (Petition for Acceptance of Final Appeal)."発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

２　第百八十六条（控訴の規定の準用）、第百八十七条（上告提起の場合における費用の予納）、第百八十九条（上告提起通知書の送達等）及び第百九十二条から前条まで（判例の摘示、上告理由の記載の仕方、上告理由書の提出期間、上告理由を記載した書面の通数、補正命令、上告裁判所への事件送付及び上告理由書の送達）の規定は、上告受理の申立てについて準用する。この場合において、第百八十七条、第百八十九条及び第百九十四条中「上告提起通知書」とあるのは「上告受理申立て通知書」と、第百八十九条第二項、第百九十五条及び前条中「被上告人」とあるのは「相手方」と、第百九十六条第一項中「第百九十条（法第三百十二条第一項及び第二項の上告理由の記載の方式）又は第百九十一条（法第三百十二条第三項の上告理由の記載の方式）」とあるのは「第百九十九条（上告受理の申立て）第一項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 192 In the final appeal prescribed in the preceding two Articles (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (2) of Article 312 of the Code; and Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (3) of Article 312 of the Code), when alleging that a judgment contains a determination that is inconsistent with precedents rendered by the Supreme Court (or precedents rendered by the former Supreme Court or those rendered by high courts as the final appellate court or the court of second instance, if there are no precedents rendered by the Supreme Court), such precedents shall be indicated specifically.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第百九十二条　前二条（法第三百十二条第一項及び第二項の上告理由の記載の方式並びに法第三百十二条第三項の上告理由の記載の方式）に規定する上告において、判決が最高裁判所の判例（これがない場合にあっては、大審院又は上告裁判所若しくは控訴裁判所である高等裁判所の判例）と相反する判断をしたことを主張するときは、その判例を具体的に示さなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 199 (1) The reasons for a petition for the acceptance of a final appeal shall be stated by indicating that the judgment of prior instance contains a determination that is inconsistent with precedents rendered by the Supreme Court (or, precedents rendered by the former Supreme Court or those rendered by high courts as the final appellate court or the court of second instance, if there are no precedents rendered by the Supreme Court) or involves material matters concerning the construction of laws and regulations. In this case, the provisions of paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of Article 191 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (3) of Article 312 of the Code) shall apply mutatis mutandis.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第百九十九条　上告受理の申立ての理由の記載は、原判決に最高裁判所の判例（これがない場合にあっては、大審院又は上告裁判所若しくは控訴裁判所である高等裁判所の判例）と相反する判断があることその他の法令の解釈に関する重要な事項を含むことを示してしなければならない。この場合においては、第百九十一条（法第三百十二条第三項の上告理由の記載の方式）第二項及び第三項の規定を準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム