Shigaku zasshiとは 意味・読み方・使い方

According to 'Japanese People's Style of Sitting' (Shigaku zasshi [Journal of Historical Studies] Volume 31, No. 8, 1920) written by Tatsukichi IRISAWA, sitting in the seiza style spread among people during the period from 1688 to 1736.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

入澤達吉「日本人の坐り方に就いて」（史学雑誌第31編第8号　1920年）では元禄～享保に広まったと推測されている。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

He publicized his achievements in authoritative journals such as "Shigaku zasshi" (Journal of Historical Studies) 78-9, "shirin" 55-6. 56-1, achieving a measure of legitimacy.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

当初は『史学雑誌』78-9や『史林』55-6、56-1など、権威あるとされる研究誌での公表を行い、一定の評価を得ていた。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

Kunitake KUME was dismissed as a professor at Tokyo Imperial University and the volumes of 'Shigaku zasshi' (Journal of Historical Studies) and 'Shikai' which carried his treatises were suppressed by the Minister of Home Affairs, Yajiro SHINAGAWA.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

久米邦武は帝国大学教授職非職となり、『史学雑誌』『史海』の論文が掲載された該当号は内務大臣(日本)品川弥二郎により発禁処分。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

The papers that pointed out the possibility of the kokuga forces system and discussed the relation of the system to the origin of samurai include "A viewpoint concerning research about the military system in the early medieval period" written by Susumu ISHII ('Shigaku zasshi' (Journal of Historical Studies), No. 12, vol. 78, in 1969) and "The process in which the kokuga forces system was formed" written by Yoshimi TODA (recorded in 'Power and the general public in the medieval period,' published by Sogensha, in 1970).発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

国衙軍制の可能性を指摘し、それが武士の起源に関係することを論じたものには、石井進『中世成立期軍制研究の一視点』（「史学雑誌」78編12号所載、1969年）や戸田芳実『国衙軍制の形成過程』（「中世の権力と民衆」所載、創元社、1970年）などがある。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

After that, 'A Material for the Boshin War' by Minoru MUSHANOKOJI ("Shigaku zasshi" (Journal of Historical Studies), Vol. 61, No.8, 1953) and 'Regarding so-called Taisei Kaigen (changing era name to Kaigen)' by Eikichi KAMATA ("Shudaishigaku" (in-house magazine of historical study group in Akita University, Akita Prefecture), No. 14, 1967) followed, then detailed study was complied in 'Consideration for establishment of so-called 'Tohoku Chotei (the Tohoku Court) in 1868' by Noriyuki FUJII ('New Study of Modern Japanese History 1') in 1981.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

その後、武者小路穣の「戊辰役の一資料」（『史学雑誌』第61編8号、昭和28年）、鎌田永吉の「いわゆる大政改元をめぐって」（『秋大史学』14号、昭和42年）と続き、昭和56年、藤井徳行「明治元年所謂「東北朝廷」成立に関する一考察」（「近代日本史の新研究1」）で詳細な研究がまとめられた。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

And also there are some argues that this theory emphasizes too much the conflict between Taisei-hokan policy and violent overthrow of the Shogunate policy, which is also another theory and points out that the both policies are not so much contradicting: "Politics in the end of Edo era and Movement of overthrow of the Shogunate" by Yoshiki IECHIKA (Yoshikawa kobunkan, 1995), "Supporters for Politics by Congress and Supporters for Overthrow of the Shogunate by Satsuma - Review on Imperial Rule Restoration Coup d'etat -" by Hidenao TAKAHASHI ("Kyoto University, Faculty of Letters, Research Report" 41, 2002), "Politics in the End of Edo Era and Satsuma Clan" by Suguru SASAKI (Yoshikawa kobunkan, 2004), and "Formation Process of Taisei-hokan Movement (1)" by Isao INOUE ("Shigaku zasshi" 81-11, 1972).発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

また、この説は大政奉還路線と武力倒幕路線の対立を必要以上に強調しすぎたきらいがあり、両者は相容れない路線ではなかったとする学説　家近良樹『幕末政治と倒幕運動』（吉川弘文館、1995年）・高橋秀直「「公議政体派」と薩摩倒幕派-王政復古クーデター再考-」（『京都大学文学部研究紀要』41、2002年）・佐々木克『幕末政治と薩摩藩』（吉川弘文館、2004年）・井上勲「大政奉還運動の形成過程(一)」（『史学雑誌』81-11、1972年）などが参考になる。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス