comprehensive health insuranceとは 意味・読み方・使い方

(6) A care prevention support plan prescribed in paragraph (1), item (v) means a plan which, for the purpose of allowing a person requiring support who leads his/her life at home to use, etc. appropriately care prevention services and any other health and medical services and welfare services that contribute to relieving or preventing from worsening the conditions where, due to physical or mental disabilities, said person requires constant care with regard to all or part of the basic activities of daily life such as bathing, excretion and eating or has trouble leading his/her daily life (hereinafter referred to as "care prevention services, etc." in this paragraph), specifies such matters as the types and contents of the care prevention services, etc. to be used by said person requiring long-term care, and which has been prepared by any person specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in Article 8-2, paragraph (18) from among the employees of a community comprehensive support center prescribed in Article 105-39, paragraph (1) of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act (referred to as a "community comprehensive support center" in Article 34-2, paragraph (2) and Article 54-2, paragraph (1)).発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

６　第一項第五号に規定する介護予防支援計画とは、居宅において生活を営む要支援者が介護予防その他身体上又は精神上の障害があるために入浴、排せつ、食事等の日常生活における基本的な動作の全部若しくは一部について常時介護を要し、又は日常生活を営むのに支障がある状態の又は悪化の防止に資する保健医療サービス及び福祉サービス（以下この項において「介護予防等」という。）の適切な利用等をすることができるようにするための当該要支援者が利用する介護予防等の種類、内容等を定める計画であつて、介護保険法第百十五条の三十九第一項に規定する地域包括支援センター（第三十四条の二第二項及び第五十四条の二第一項において「地域包括支援センター」という。）の職員のうち同法第八条の二第十八項の厚生労働省令で定める者が作成したものをいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Out of the performance in kind prescribed in the preceding paragraph, in-home care services, the furnishing of welfare equipment, facility care services, care prevention services and the furnishing of welfare equipment for care prevention shall be provided by way of entrusting such assistance to a long-term care provider (which means a person who provides in-home care services as his/her business, a person who prepares in-home care support plans as his/her business, a person who sells specified welfare equipment prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (13) of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act as his/her business [referred to as a "specified welfare equipment dealer" in Article 54-2, paragraph (1)], a community-based long-term care welfare facility for the elderly, a long-term care welfare facility for the elderly, a long-term care health facility for the elderly, a person who provides care prevention services as his/her business, a community comprehensive support center, or a person who sells specified welfare equipment for care prevention prescribed in Article 8-2, paragraph (13) of the same Act as his/her business [referred to as a "specified care prevention welfare equipment dealer" in Article 54-2, paragraph (1)]; the same shall apply hereinafter) who has been designated pursuant to the provisions of Article 54-2, paragraph (1) (including a community-based long-term care welfare facility for the elderly or a long-term care welfare facility for the elderly that is deemed to have received the designation under paragraph (1) of the same Article pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the same Article).発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

２　前項に規定する現物給付のうち、居宅介護、福祉用具の給付、施設介護、介護予防及び介護予防福祉用具の給付は、介護機関（その事業として居宅介護を行う者及びその事業として居宅介護支援計画を作成する者、その事業として介護保険法第八条第十三項に規定する特定福祉用具販売を行う者（第五十四条の二第一項において「特定福祉用具販売事業者」という。）、地域密着型介護老人福祉施設、介護老人福祉施設及び介護老人保健施設、その事業として介護予防を行う者及び地域包括支援センター並びにその事業として同法第八条の二第十三項に規定する特定介護予防福祉用具販売を行う者（第五十四条の二第一項において「特定介護予防福祉用具販売事業者」という。）をいう。以下同じ。）であつて、第五十四条の二第一項の規定により指定を受けたもの（同条第二項の規定により同条第一項の指定を受けたものとみなされた地域密着型介護老人福祉施設及び介護老人福祉施設を含む。）にこれを委託して行うものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I take it that you are asking about the proposed amendment to the Insurance Business Act that has been passed to the current session for continued deliberation. I assume that you are questioning the appropriateness of a mutual aid business of a public interest corporation or the arrangement in which a mutual aid business of a given public interest corporation is to be supervised by the former competent authorities, with an implication that the FSA should be responsible for supervision. Well, the fact is that the respective authorities, having the experience of supervising public interest corporations for a long time, are well-versed with specifics of their operation. On the subject of this Act, I believe that I named several examples the other day, such as the Japan Medical Association, which has always been supervised by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare since the Meiji era, including the years of supervision by its predecessor, the Health and Medical Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. While circumstances vary from authority to authority, they know very extensively about internal affairs of those corporations and have exercised thorough supervision and, in that sense, have a set of knowledge of their operation and other information accumulated in the course of the work of supervision in the past, which accordingly makes them presumably capable of delivering more fine-tuned supervision than the FSA would be. Since the most important thing is policyholder protection, we believe that, from such a perspective, having the former authorities supervise them is an appropriate way to go. It is also in comprehensive consideration of overall circumstances, including the fact that this exemption of the Act is a provisional step, that we find it appropriate to have the former authorities continue to supervise those corporations.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

継続審議となっている保険業法の改正案のことだと思いますけれども、公益法人の共済事業あるいは旧主務官庁が監督することになっていますが、それはいかがなものかと、金融庁として監督すべきではないかという質問かと思いますけれども、公益法人というのは、それぞれの官庁が長い間、公益法人の監督をしてきたわけでございますから、その業務に関しては、各監督官庁が事情をよく知っており、この法律については、幾つかこの前も申し上げたと思いますが、例えば、日本医師会は確か明治以来、厚生省、当時の内務省衛生局が、ずっと監督官庁でございまして、各省色々ありますけれども、内部のことを非常によく知っており、各主務官庁がきめ細かい監督を行っていますから、そういった意味で、その業務に関する知見やこれまでの監督について蓄積している情報がございますので、金融庁に比べてより細かな監督を行うことができると考えられまして、契約者保護ということが一番大事ではございますが、そういった観点から（旧主務官庁が監督することが）適当というふうに考えております。そして、この法律の特例は当分の間という措置でございますので、そういったことを総合的に勘案して、引き続き旧主務官庁が監督することが適切だと考えております。 - 金融庁