establish by proofとは 意味・読み方・使い方

However, the Appellate Body upheld the Panel's findings that the EU measures were not based on sufficient risk assessment and therefore violated Article 5.1 of the SPS Agreement. Lastly, the Appellate Body reversed the Panel's interpretation regarding the burden of proof by finding that the burden of proof to establish a WTO infraction resides with the complaining country (in this case, the United States) in cases where a country introduces or maintains sanitary or phytosanitary measures and the question is whether the measures result in a higher level of protection than would be achieved by relevant international standards.例文帳に追加

なお、パネルが国際的な基準よりも高い水準の検疫措置を導入又は維持するための要件を満たしているか否かの挙証責任は措置国（EU）にあるとしたのに対し、上級委員会は提訴国（米国）にあるとの判断を行った。 - 経済産業省

Where a plaintiff asserts claims on grounds of infringement of a registered trade mark within the meaning of Sections 14, 18 and 19 by bringing an action, he shall, in response to an objection by the defendant, establish proof that the trade mark has been put to use pursuant to Section 26 within a period of five years before the bringing of the action, for the goods or services on which the grounds for his claims are based, provided that the trade mark has, on that date, been registered at least for five years. Where the period of five years of non-use ends after the bringing of the action, the plaintiff shall, in response to an objection by the defendant, establish proof that the trade mark has been put to use pursuant to Section 26 within a period of five years preceding the conclusion of the oral proceedings. For the decision, only those goods or services shall be taken into account for which proof of use has been established.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第14条，第18条及び第19条に定める登録商標の侵害を理由とする請求を原告が訴訟により主張した場合は，原告は，被告による反論に応じて，自己の請求の根拠となる商品又はサービスについて訴訟の提起前の5年以内に第26条の規定に基づく当該商標の使用がなされたことを立証しなければならない。ただし，当該日に，商標が少なくとも5年間登録されている場合に限る。訴訟の提起後に5年の不使用期間が終了した場合は，原告は，被告による反論に応じて，口頭審理の終結前の5年以内に第26条の規定に基づいて商標が使用されていることを立証しなければならない。決定に当たっては，使用が立証された商品又はサービスのみが考慮されるものとする。 - 特許庁