personal reviewとは 意味・読み方・使い方

Article 42 When there is an appeal against a Disclosure Decision, etc., a Correction Decision, etc. or a Use Suspension Decision, etc. pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Appeal Act (Act No. 160 of 1962), the head of the Administrative Organ who is expected to make a determination or decision on the appeal shall, except in the cases that fall under any of the following items, consult the Information Disclosure and Personal Information Protection Review Board (when the head of the Administrative Organ who is expected to make a determination or decision on the appeal is head of the Board of Audit, a review board separately provided for by a law):発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第四十二条　開示決定等、訂正決定等又は利用停止決定等について行政不服審査法（昭和三十七年法律第百六十号）による不服申立てがあったときは、当該不服申立てに対する裁決又は決定をすべき行政機関の長は、次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合を除き、情報公開・個人情報保護審査会（不服申立てに対する裁決又は決定をすべき行政機関の長が会計検査院長である場合にあっては、別に法律で定める審査会）に諮問しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The fare used on PiTaPa can be paid afterwards and the personal information will be checked before the card is issued, this being the same process as issuing credit cards (there is a different level of review compared to the one with the credit card, although it is not announced); and there is more demand for PASMO since the card can be purchased with no identification and no condition, making it easier for those who don't prefer to use the same system as with credit cards.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

これは、PiTaPaがポストペイ（後払い）というシステムを取っているため、カードの発行に際しクレジットカードのように審査が必要（但し公表されてはいないものの、クレジットカードとは別の審査基準となっている）である一方、PASMOの場合は無条件・無記名で購入できるカードのため、カードを持てない人やクレジットカードを嫌う層に一定の需要があるためである。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

(iv) Does the Screening Division keep the Marketing and Sales Division, etc. fully aware that it is necessary to attach importance to the soundness of borrowers' business operations such as their strength in technology and sales and their growth potential as well as the profitability and the future potential of the businesses they are engaged in and to avoid relying too much on the collateral and personal guarantees, and does it review whether the Marketing and Sales Division is acting appropriately?発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

（ⅳ）審査部門は、営業推進部門等に対して、健全な事業を営む融資先の技術力・販売力・成長性等や事業そのものの採算性・将来性を重視し、担保や個人保証に依存しすぎないように周知徹底を図るとともに、営業推進部門等が適切に実行しているか検証しているか。 - 金融庁

Regarding former Minister Takenaka, I received a similar question in relation to the Takenaka Plan (Financial Revitalization Program). There are not any minutes of debate on this program. According to the review committee's report, Former Minister Takenaka notified the FSA of the Financial Revitalization Program, which was, so to speak, his personal plan, at the same time as its public announcement, without the direct involvement of the FSA Commissioner and other FSA staff in its formulation. The FSA staff was ordered to conduct financial administration based on this program, and it was Mr. Tsuyoshi Kimura who explained its contents to the FSA staff, according to the report.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

竹中（元）大臣について、一つは竹中プラン（金融再生プログラム）に対して、前もそういう質問が出ましたが、実はこれは一切議事録がございませんが、竹中平蔵（元）大臣がある意味で個人的に温めていたプランを、報告書によれば、金融庁長官以下、金融庁職員は直接に参加しないまま、金融再生プログラムが発表と同時に金融庁に示達され、金融庁職員はそれに基づいて金融行政をやるよう命ぜられ、その内容を金融庁職員に説明したのは木村剛氏であったというふうに報告書には指摘をされております。 - 金融庁

(iv) Does the Screening Division keep the Marketing and Sales Division, etc. fully aware that it is necessary to attach importance to the soundness of borrowers' business operations such as their strength in technology and sales and their growth potential as well as the profitability and the future potential of the businesses they are engaged in and to avoid relying too much on the collateral and personal guarantees, and does it review whether the Marketing and Sales Division is acting appropriately?発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

（ⅳ）審査部門は、営業推進部門等に対して、健全な事業を営む融資先の技術力・販売力・成長性等や事業そのものの採算性・将来性を重視し、担保や個人保証に依存しすぎないように周知徹底を図るとともに、営業推進部門等が適切に実行しているか検証しているか。（ⅴ）審査部門は、金融円滑化管理責任者と適切に連携し、新規融資や貸付条件の変更等の相談・申込みへの対応のうち、金融円滑化の趣旨に照らして、不適切又は不適切なおそれのあるものについて、適時適切に情報を収集し、金融円滑化管理責任者に報告しているか。 - 金融庁

2. Specifically, we will carry out measures such as the following as a package: Tax reductions for R&D and focused investment incentives, for improving the competitiveness of Japanese industries; Integration of inheritance and gift taxes for encouraging the smooth transfer of assets from the older generation to the younger generation and cuts in tax rates; Reduction and simplification of taxation of financial transactions and stocks for encouraging a shift from 'deposits' to 'investment'; Cuts in the tax rates of registration and license taxes for promoting utilization of land; Abolition of' special allowance for spouse' (exceeding the amount of the 'allowance for spouse')to simplify personal allowances, etc.; Reduction of the tax-exempt threshold, etc., to increase people's trust in the consumption tax and improve its transparency; Review of tobacco and liquor taxes; and other measures例文帳に追加

２具体的には、我が国産業の競争力強化のための研究開発・設備投資減税の集中・重点化、次世代への資産移転の円滑化に資する相続税・贈与税の一体化及び税率の引下げ、「貯蓄から投資へ」の改革に資する金融・証券税制の軽減・簡素化、土地の有効利用の促進に資する登録免許税の軽減、人的控除の簡素化等の観点からの配偶者特別控除の上乗せ部分の廃止、消費税に対する信頼性・透明性を向上させるための免税点制度等の改革、酒税及びたばこ税の見直しその他の所要の措置を一体として講ずることといたします。 - 財務省

The ban was fully lifted in December 2007, with the sales of all insurance products approved as a result and, now that roughly three years have passed, the steps for prevention of harmful practices are slated to be changed as necessary on the basis of monitoring results and other information from the perspective of the protection and convenience of insurance policyholders, etc. However, I do not feel it appropriate to make a definite statement about any future orientation now. From what I heard, however, over-the-counter sales make up 1 percent of non-life insurance sales and approximately 6 percent of life insurance sales, which are the figures that I believe have been reported to me. Judging from those, it seems to me that the firewall or information on financing deals is protected fairly strictly. I recall the debate that took place in the past about the possible highly negative impact of the insurance sales by banks on the livelihood of sales agents marketing life insurance products but some regional banks are actually not engaged in life insurance sales. In the meantime, I hear that the three mega-banks are selling life insurance, but my guess is that it rather reflects their effort to have a full line of products, so to speak. The possibility of the insurance sales by banks posing a real threat to the life insurance industry, particularly the livelihood of life insurance sales agents, was a subject of a heated debate in the LDP as well. It turns out that more liberalization does help add more convenience for the people, as the results show: the over-the-counter sales by banks make up 6 percent of life insurance sales and 1 percent in non-life insurance sales. Let me also point out that it is extremely important to protect life insurance policyholders and that the greater the convenience for prospective policyholders, the more accessible life insurance becomes. I cannot give any definite word at this point in time – if I may be a little daring, however, I would say on the issue of the scheduled review after three years that the statistics look acceptable to me, but that is just my personal opinion.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

平成19年12月、すべての保険商品の取扱いが認められて全面解禁したわけでございますが、弊害防止措置についてはモニタリング結果等を踏まえ、保険契約者等の保護や利便性の観点から概ね3年間経過しまして、所要の見直しを行うことにしておりますが、現在の方向性については、現在確たることは申し上げられないというふうに思っておりますが、たしか私が聞くところによりますと、窓口販売は損害保険だとたしか1％、それから生命保険だと6％ぐらいの数字ということをたしか報告いただいておりますので、ファイアーウォールといいますか、融資に関する情報がかなりきちんと私は厳格に守られているのではないかということを思っておりますし、一時こんなものを銀行で売られたら、生命保険を売って回る生保の募集員の方々の生活を非常に圧迫するというような論議も当時あったやに私は覚えておりますけれども、現実には地方銀行でも生命保険を売っていないところもございますし、それから、3メガバンクは売っているようでございますが、それもどちらかというと商品を揃えるというか、そういう色彩が強いのではないかというふうに私は思っておりまして、当時、銀行で窓販されるともう生命保険業界、特に生命保険の勧誘員の方の生活が本当に脅かされるというようなことを大変自由民主党でも当時議論の過程では噴出したのですが、結果としては、この生命保険が窓販6％、損保1％ということを見れば、この辺はやはりできるだけ自由にした方が国民の利便になるわけですから、それから、生命保険に入った人の保護というのは非常に大事でございまして、生命保険に入る人の利便性というか、便利な方がより生命保険に接することができるわけですから、そういったところを考えたら、まだ今の時点では確たることは申し上げられませんけれども、しかし、3年後に見直しを行うということでございますが、こういうことは少し一歩踏み込んだ発言になるのかもしれませんけれども、出てきた数字を見ると、妥当なところではないかなというふうに私は、ここは個人的意見ですけれども、思いますね。 - 金融庁

Article 183 (1) The provisions of Article 1-3 to Article 5 inclusive (Registry Office; Delegation of Affairs; Suspension of Affairs; Registrar; Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to Article 15 inclusive (Prohibition on Carrying Out of Registries and Other Documents; Loss and Restoration of Registries; Prevention of Loss of Registry, etc.; Issuance of Certificate of Registered Matters; Issuance of Documents Specifying Extract of Matters Registered; Inspection of Annexed Documents; Certificate of Seal Impression; Certification of Matters Required for Verification of Measures to Identify the Creator of Electromagnetic Records and Other Matters; Fees; Registration Upon Application by Party; Registration upon Commission), Article 17 to Article 27 inclusive (Method of Application for Registration; Document to Be Attached to Written Application; Electromagnetic Records to be Attached to Written Application; Submission of Seal Impression; Acceptance of Applications; Receipt; Order of Registration; Identity Confirmation by Registrar; Dismissal of Application; Registration to Be Made After Lapse of Period for Filing Action; Change in Administrative Zone, etc.; Prohibition on Registration of Identical Trade Name at Same Location), Article 33 (Cancellation of Registration of Trade Name), Article 34 (Registration of Trade Name of Company), Article 44 and Article 45 (Registration of Company's Manager), Article 46 (excluding paragraph (4)) (General Rules on Documents to be Attached), Article 47(1) (Registration of Incorporation), Article 48 to Article 55 inclusive (Registration to Be Made at Location of Branch Office; Registration of Relocation of Head Office; Registration of Change of Directors and Other Officers; Registration of Change of Person Who is to Temporarily Perform Duties of Accounting Auditors), Article 64 (Registration of Change Due to Share Option Issue), Article 71 (Registration of Dissolution), Article 73 to Article 75 inclusive (Registration of Liquidator; Registration of Change Related to Liquidator; Registration of Completion of Liquidation), and Article 132 to Article 148 inclusive (Correction; Application for Cancellation; Ex Officio Cancellation; Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Procedure Act; Exclusion from Application of the Act on Access Information Held by Administrative Organs; Exclusion from the Application of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information Held by Administrative Organs; Request for Review; Handling of Request for Review Case; Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Appeal Act; Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act (Act No. 125 of 1963) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrases "to Article 50 inclusive (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 95, Article 111 and Article 118)" and "Article 51, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 52, Article 78, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 82, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 83, Article 87, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 88, Article 91, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 92, Article 132" in Article 15 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "to Article 50 inclusive" and "Article 132," respectively, the phrase "a document evidencing authority delegated to a privately appointed agent or a transferor's written approval prescribed in Article 30, paragraph (2) or Article 31, paragraph (2)" in Article 24(vii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a document evidencing authority delegated to a privately appointed agent," the term "company registry" in Article 34(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Company Registry," the phrase "the items of Article 930, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act" in Article 48(2) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 930(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 22(4) of the Act on Securitization of Assets (hereinafter referred to as the 'Asset Securitization Act')," the phrase ", representative director or special director (in the case of a company with committees, a director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer)" in Article 54(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or representative director," the phrases "Article 333, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act" and "Article 337, paragraph (1) of said Act" in Article 54(2)(iii) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 71(1) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 73(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Article 346, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act" in Article 55(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 76(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Companies Act" and "Article 483, paragraph (4) of said Act" in Article 71(3) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 167(1)(i) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 171(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (ii) or (iii) of the Companies Act" in Article 73(2) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 167(1)(ii) or (iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "Article 928, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Companies Act" in Article 73(3) and Article 74(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 928(1)(ii) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 179(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "Article 507, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act" in Article 75 of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 507(3) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 179(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第百八十三条　商業登記法（昭和三十八年法律第百二十五号）第一条の三から第五条まで（登記所、事務の委任、事務の停止、登記官、登記官の除斥）、第七条から第十五条まで（登記簿等の持出禁止、登記簿の滅失と回復、登記簿等の滅失防止、登記事項証明書の交付等、登記事項の概要を記載した書面の交付、附属書類の閲覧、印鑑証明、電磁的記録の作成者を示す措置の確認に必要な事項等の証明、手数料、当事者申請主義、嘱託による登記）、第十七条から第二十七条まで（登記申請の方式、申請書の添付書面、申請書に添付すべき電磁的記録、印鑑の提出、受付、受領証、登記の順序、登記官による本人確認、申請の却下、提訴期間経過後の登記、行政区画等の変更、同一の所在場所における同一の商号の登記の禁止）、第三十三条（商号の登記の抹消）、第三十四条（会社の商号の登記）、第四十四条、第四十五条（会社の支配人の登記）、第四十六条（第四項を除く。）（添付書面の通則）、第四十七条第一項（設立の登記）、第四十八条から第五十五条まで（支店所在地における登記、本店移転の登記、取締役等の変更の登記、一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者の変更の登記）、第六十四条（株主名簿管理人の設置による変更の登記）、第七十一条（解散の登記）、第七十三条から第七十五条まで（清算人の登記、清算人に関する変更の登記、清算結了の登記）及び第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで（更正、抹消の申請、職権抹消、行政手続法の適用除外、行政機関の保有する情報の公開に関する法律の適用除外、行政機関の保有する個人情報の保護に関する法律の適用除外、審査請求、審査請求事件の処理、行政不服審査法の適用除外、省令への委任）の規定は、特定目的会社に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第十五条中「第五十条まで（第九十五条、第百十一条及び第百十八条において準用する場合を含む。）」とあるのは「第五十条まで」と、「第五十一条第一項及び第二項、第五十二条、第七十八条第一項及び第三項、第八十二条第二項及び第三項、第八十三条、第八十七条第一項及び第二項、第八十八条、第九十一条第一項及び第二項、第九十二条、第百三十二条並びに」とあるのは「第百三十二条及び」と、同法第二十四条第七号中「書面若しくは第三十条第二項若しくは第三十一条第二項に規定する譲渡人の承諾書」とあるのは「書面」と、同法第三十四条第一項中「会社の登記簿」とあるのは「特定目的会社登記簿」と、同法第四十八条第二項中「会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」とあるのは「資産の流動化に関する法律（以下「資産流動化法」という。）第二十二条第四項において準用する会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」と、同法第五十四条第一項中「取締役、監査役、代表取締役又は特別取締役（委員会設置会社にあつては、取締役、委員、執行役又は代表執行役）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は代表取締役」と、同条第二項第三号中「会社法第三百三十三条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十一条第一項」と、「同法第三百三十七条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十三条第一項」と、同法第五十五条第一項中「会社法第三百四十六条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十六条第四項」と、同法第七十一条第三項中「会社法第四百七十八条第一項第一号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百六十七条第一項第一号」と、「同法第四百八十三条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十一条第四項」と、同法第七十三条第二項中「会社法第四百七十八条第一項第二号又は第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百六十七条第一項第二号又は第三号」と、同条第三項及び同法第七十四条第一項中「会社法第九百二十八条第一項第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十九条第一項において準用する会社法第九百二十八条第一項第二号」と、同法第七十五条中「会社法第五百七条第三項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十九条第一項において準用する会社法第五百七条第三項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム