下中当の英語

２　派遣中の労働者の派遣就業に関しては、派遣先の事業のみを、派遣中の労働者を使用する事業とみなして、労働基準法第七条、第三十二条、第三十二条の二第一項、第三十二条の三、第三十二条の四第一項から第三項まで、第三十三条から第三十五条まで、第三十六条第一項、第四十条、第四十一条、第六十条から第六十三条まで、第六十四条の二、第六十四条の三及び第六十六条から第六十八条までの規定並びに当該規定に基づいて発する命令の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則の規定を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第三十二条の二第一項中「当該事業場に」とあるのは「労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律（以下「労働者派遣法」という。）第四十四条第三項に規定する派遣元の使用者（以下単に「派遣元の使用者」という。）が、当該派遣元の事業（同項に規定する派遣元の事業をいう。以下同じ。）の事業場に」と、同法第三十二条の三中「就業規則その他これに準ずるものにより、」とあるのは「派遣元の使用者が就業規則その他これに準ずるものにより」と、「とした労働者」とあるのは「とした労働者であつて、当該労働者に係る労働者派遣法第二十六条第一項に規定する労働者派遣契約に基づきこの条の規定による労働時間により労働させることができるもの」と、「当該事業場の」とあるのは「派遣元の使用者が、当該派遣元の事業の事業場の」と、同法第三十二条の四第一項及び第二項中「当該事業場に」とあるのは「派遣元の使用者が、当該派遣元の事業の事業場に」と、同法第三十六条第一項中「当該事業場に」とあるのは「派遣元の使用者が、当該派遣元の事業の事業場に」と、「これを行政官庁に」とあるのは「及びこれを行政官庁に」とする。例文帳に追加

(2) With regard to dispatch work performed by a worker under dispatching, the provisions of Article 7, Article 32, paragraph (1) of Article 32-2, Article 32-3, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive of Article 32-4, Articles 33 to 35 inclusive, paragraph (1) of Article 36, Article 40, Article 41, Articles 60 to 63 inclusive, Article 64-2, Article 64-3 and Articles 66 to 68 inclusive of the Labor Standards Act and the provisions of orders based on said provisions (including penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall apply only to the client undertaking, by deeming it to be an undertaking employing a worker under dispatching. In this case, the term "at the workplace" in paragraph (1) of Article 32-2 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "at the workplace of a business of the dispatching undertaking (which means the dispatching undertaking prescribed in the same paragraph; the same shall apply hereinafter), where an employer of the dispatching undertaking prescribed in paragraph (3) of Article 44 of the Act for Securing the Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act") (hereinafter such employer shall be simply referred to as a "dispatching employer")"; the term "pursuant to rules of employment or the equivalent thereof" in Article 32-3 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "pursuant to rules of employment or the equivalent, a dispatching employer"; the term "a worker for whom" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "a worker who can be made to work for working hours under the provisions of Article 26 of the Worker Dispatching Act, based on the worker dispatch contract with regard to the worker concerned under paragraph (1) of the same Article"; the term "at the workplace concerned" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "at the workplace of a business of the dispatching undertaking, where the dispatching employer"; the term "at the workplace " in paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 32-4 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "at the workplace of a business of the dispatching undertaking, where the dispatching employer"; the term "at the workplace" in paragraph (1) of Article 36 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with" at the workplace of a business of the dispatching undertaking, where the dispatching employer"; and the term "this to the relevant government agency " in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "and this to the relevant government agency".発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五条　前条の規定は、事業者が第三者に対し、当該事業者と消費者との間における消費者契約の締結について媒介をすることの委託（以下この項において単に「委託」という。）をし、当該委託を受けた第三者（その第三者から委託（二以上の段階にわたる委託を含む。）を受けた者を含む。以下「受託者等」という。）が消費者に対して同条第一項から第三項までに規定する行為をした場合について準用する。この場合において、同条第二項ただし書中「当該事業者」とあるのは、「当該事業者又は次条第一項に規定する受託者等」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 5 (1) The preceding article shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a business operator entrusts a third party to intermediate a consumer contract between the business operator and a consumer (which shall be referred to simply as "entrustment" for purposes of this paragraph), and the third party (which includes a person entrusted by such third party (including any person who is entrusted through more than two layers of entrustment) who shall be referred to as "entrusted person, etc." hereinafter) commits any acts set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3) of the preceding article with respect to a consumer. In this case, "the business operator" referred to in the proviso of para. (2) of the preceding article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the business operator or the entrusted person, etc. provided in para. (1) of the following article."#"toritsugi": entering into a juristic act on an agent's own name but for the account of the principal. Standard Bilingual Dictionary assigns the word "trustee" for "jyutaku-sha." But, there is no trust relation between the person who entrusts the business and those who are entrusted under "toritsugi." Therefore, we used the word "entrusted person" for "jyutaku-sha."#発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　第二百七十五条第一項、第三項及び第四項並びに会社法第四百四十二条第三項（計算書類等の備置き及び閲覧等）の規定は、第一項の場合について準用する。この場合において、第二百七十五条第一項中「当該受託信託会社等であった信託会社等（以下この条において「前受託信託会社等」という。）」とあるのは「当該受託信託会社等」と、同法第四百四十二条第三項中「株主及び債権者」とあるのは「各受益証券の権利者」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 275(1), (3), and (4) of this Act and the provisions of Article 442(3) (Keeping and Inspection of Financial Statements, Etc.) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the phrase "the Trust Company, etc. that served as said Fiduciary Trust Company, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Former Fiduciary Trust Company, etc." in this Article)" in Article 275(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Former Fiduciary Trust Company, etc.," the phrase "The shareholders and creditors" in Article 442(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Beneficiary Certificate Holders," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

１０　第十七条の規定は、重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は表示すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の表示が欠けている公開買付説明書（第二項において準用する第二十七条の九第一項に規定する公開買付説明書をいう。以下この節において同じ。）その他の表示を使用して上場株券等の売付け等をさせた者について準用する。この場合において、同条中「当該有価証券を取得した者」とあるのは、「当該公開買付けに応じて上場株券等の売付け等をした者」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(10) Article 17 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person who has another person make Sales, etc. of Listed Share Certificates, etc. using a Tender Offer Statement (meaning Tender Offer Statement as defined in Article 27-9(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section) that contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks an indication on any important matters that should be indicated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding, or other such indication. In this case, the term "the other person who acquires the Securities" in Article 17 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person who makes Sales, etc. of the Listed Share Certificates, etc. in response to the Tender Offer."発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

７　会社の成立する日の属する営業年度の試験研究費の額については、租税特別措置法（昭和三十二年法律第二十六号）第四十二条の四第一項の規定中「当該法人の昭和四十二年一月一日を含む事業年度の直前の事業年度（以下この条において「基準年度」という。）から当該適用年度の直前の事業年度までの各事業年度の所得の金額の計算上損金の額に算入される試験研究費の額」とあるのは「日本電信電話公社の昭和五十九年四月一日を含む事業年度の試験研究費の額」と、「のうち最も多い額を超える場合」とあるのは「を超える場合」として同項本文の規定を適用するものとし、同項ただし書の規定は、適用しない。例文帳に追加

(7) With respect to the amount of expenses for test and research for the business year to which the date of incorporation of the Company belongs, the main provisions of Article 42-4 paragraph (1) of the Special Taxation Measures Act (Act No. 26 of 1957) shall apply: Provided that "the amount of expenses for test and research of each business year to be included in the amount of loss in the calculation of income for the respective business year during the period from the business year (in this article referred to as "the reference year") immediately prior to the business year of the juridical person including January 1, 1967 to the business year immediately prior to said applicable business year" in the same paragraph shall be read as "the amount of expenses for test and research for the business year including April 1, 1984 of the Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Public Corporation", and that "in the case of exceeding the largest amount of" in the same paragraph shall be read as "in the case of exceeding the amount of", the provision of the same paragraph shall not apply.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第八条の三　第七条の二第一項、第三項から第五項まで、第七項から第十三項まで、第十七項、第十八項及び第二十一項の規定は、第八条第一項第一号（不当な取引制限に相当する行為をする場合に限る。）又は第二号（不当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定又は国際的契約をする場合に限る。）の規定に違反する行為が行われた場合に準用する。この場合において、第七条の二第一項中「事業者が」とあるのは「事業者団体が」と、「当該事業者に対し」とあるのは「当該事業者団体の構成事業者（事業者の利益のためにする行為を行う役員、従業員、代理人その他の者が構成事業者である場合には、当該事業者を含む。以下この条において「特定事業者」という。）に対し」と、同条第四項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、同条第五項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「をやめた者（次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめた者（当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動」と、同条第七項中「納付すべき事業者」とあるのは「納付すべき特定事業者」と、「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第八項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第九項中「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第十項及び第十一項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、同条第十二項中「行つた事業者」とあるのは「行つた特定事業者」と、「当該事業者が行つた」とあるのは「当該特定事業者が行つた」と、「、当該事業者」とあるのは「、当該特定事業者」と、「当該事業者がした」とあるのは「当該事業者団体がした」と、「他の事業者」とあるのは「他の特定事業者」と、「第一項に規定する違反行為をする」とあるのは「当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動を行う」と、「をやめる」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめる」と、同条第十三項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、「した違反行為」とあるのは「行つた同項第一号の規定による報告」と、同条第十七項及び第十八項中「第四項から第六項まで、第八項、第九項又は第十四項」とあるのは「第四項、第五項、第八項又は第九項」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 8-3 The provisions of paragraphs 1, 3 to 5 inclusive, 7 to 13 inclusive, 17, 18 and 21 of Article 7-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an act is committed in violation of the provisions of item 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 8 (limited to cases of committing an act which falls under unreasonable restraint of trade) or item 2 thereof (limited to cases of entering into an international agreement or an international contract which contains such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade). In this case, in paragraph 1 of Article 7-2, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade association"; and the term "order the said entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "order the constituent entrepreneur of the said trade association (including the relevant entrepreneur when an officer, employee, agent, or any other person acting for the benefit of an entrepreneur is a constituent entrepreneur; hereinafter referred to as "specified entrepreneur" in this Article)"; in paragraph 4 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 5 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "had discontinued the business activities that constituted the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation of the business activities that constituted the relevant violation is less than two years)"; in paragraph 7 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 8 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 9 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneur that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; and the term " has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraphs 10 and 11 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 12 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "committed by the relevant entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "committed by the relevant trade association"; the term "commit the violation provided for in paragraph 1" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effect the business activities that constituted the relevant violation"; and the term "discontinuing" shall be deemed to be replaced with "discontinuing the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 13 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; and the term "violation committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "report submitted pursuant to the provisions of item 1 of the same paragraph"; and in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the said Article, the term "paragraphs 1, 4 to 6 inclusive, 8, 9, and 14" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 8, and 9".発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

９　特定少額短期保険業者が新保険業法第二百七十二条の三十第二項において準用する新保険業法第百四十四条第二項に規定する委託会社である場合においては、同項中「当該管理の委託をする保険会社（以下この節において「委託会社」という。）及び受託会社」とあるのは「受託会社」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の三十第二項において準用する新保険業法第百四十六条第三項中「商業登記法第十八条、第十九条（申請書の添付書面）及び第四十六条（添付書面の通則）（これらの規定を第六十七条において準用する場合を含む。）に定める書類のほか、次に掲げる書類」とあるのは「次に掲げる書類」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の三十第二項において準用する新保険業法第百四十九条第一項中「委託会社及び受託会社」とあるのは「受託会社」とする。例文帳に追加

(9) In the case where the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider is the Entrusting Company prescribed in Article 144, paragraph (2) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-30, paragraph (2) of the New Insurance Business Act, the term "both the Insurance Company entrusting the administration activity (hereinafter referred to as "Entrusting Company" in this Section) and" in Article 144, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term ", in addition to the documents set forth in Articles 18 and 19 (Documents to be attached to written application) and Article 46 (General rules on attached documents) of the Commercial Registration Act (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 67)" in Article 146, paragraph (3) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-30, paragraph (2) of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be deleted; and the term "both the Entrusting Company and" in Article 149, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-30, paragraph (2) of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be deleted.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　基準日前に最初の自動車登録ファイルへの登録又は最初の自動車検査証の交付を受けた自動車が基準日以後における最初の自動車検査証の返付又は最初の自動車登録ファイルへの登録若しくは最初の自動車検査証の交付を受けるよりも前に使用済自動車として引取業者に引き渡される場合における第七十三条第一項の規定の適用については、同項中「当該自動車が最初の自動車登録ファイルへの登録（道路運送車両法第四条の規定による自動車登録ファイルへの登録をいう。以下同じ。）を受けるとき（同法第三条に規定する軽自動車（同法第五十八条第一項に規定する検査対象外軽自動車を除く。）にあっては当該自動車が最初の自動車検査証の交付（同法第六十条第一項又は第七十一条第四項の規定による自動車検査証の交付をいう。以下同じ。）を受けるとき、同法第五十八条第一項に規定する検査対象外軽自動車にあっては当該自動車が最初の車両番号の指定（同法第九十七条の三第一項の規定による車両番号の指定をいう。以下同じ。）を受けるとき）までに」とあるのは、「当該自動車を使用済自動車として引取業者に引き渡すときまでに」とする。例文帳に追加

(2) For application of the provisions of Article 73, Paragraph 1 in the case where a Vehicle having obtained the initial Registration in the Vehicle Registration File or the initial issuance of a vehicle inspection certificate before the Base Date is delivered to a Collection Operator as an End-of-Life Vehicle before the return of the initial vehicle inspection certificate, or receipt of the initial Registration in the Vehicle Registration File or the issuance of the initial vehicle inspection certificate on or after the Base Date, the phrase "until the first registration in the vehicle registration file (hereinafter referred to as the Registration in the Vehicle Registration File according to the provisions of the Road Transport Vehicle Act, Article 4; the same shall apply hereinafter) has been obtained (for a light vehicle (excluding light vehicles not subject to the inspection prescribed in the Road Transport Vehicle Act, Article 58, Paragraph 1) prescribed in the Road Transport Vehicle Act, Article 3, when said Vehicle receives the first issuance (hereinafter referred to issuance of a vehicle inspection certificate according to the provisions of the Road Transport Vehicle Act, Article 60, Paragraph 1 or Article 71, Paragraph 4) of a vehicle inspection certificate, for a light vehicle not subject to the inspection prescribed in the Road Transport Vehicle Act, Article 58, Paragraph 1, when said Vehicle obtains the first designation of a vehicle number (hereinafter referred to as Designation of a Vehicle Number according to the provisions of the Road Transport Vehicle Act, Article 97-3, Paragraph 1" shall be deemed to replaced with "until said Vehicle is delivered to a Collection Operator as an End-of-Life Vehicle".発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム