相手の意見に耳を傾けないのは不当であると私達は考えた。の英語

We thought it wrong not to listen to our opponents.

Opinion is ultimately determined by the feelings, and not by the intellect.

How awful to reflect that what people say of us is true!

Due to their different ways of thinking, they have yet to unify their opinions.

The reason is that I think that if someone cannot value other peoples' opinions, that person cannot establish relationships with mutual trust.

It sometimes is the case that there is a lot of disagreement.

Even if the opinions of others can be suppressed, I cannot imagine to what results my speech may lead.

To what result my speech is related even if stranger's opinion can be suppressed cannot be imagined.

It is important to sometimes listen to others' points of view instead of being so insistent of your own.

We say that we judge people based on their contents, but in the ends, don't we just judge the based on the part of them that we can see outside?

We say that we judge people based on their contents, but in the end, don't we just judge them based on their exterior?

Your reticence to speak out lends itself to your detractor's criticism.

They consider it impolite to disagree with someone they don't know very well.

One is apt to think oneself faultless. State the facts as they are.

I think it's also important to listen to other people's opinions.

We respect the opinions of others.

One is apt to think oneself faultless. State the facts as they are.

That couple never fights; they are always in agreement on everything.

Your opinion only considers the benefits of the concerned party, so it is not pertinent.

We cannot understand others completely and we will not be understood completely by anyone.

We tend to welcome only proofs of what we already know.

We tend to welcome only proof of what we already know.

As long as he doesn't change his stance, he won't listen to anybody else's opinion.

A real discussion is not just a question of hitting your opponent where it hurts.

It's sub judice, so I can make no comment on it.

I don't think it's necessary to have only the two patterns of agreeing or opposing someone's opinion.

I think it's not necessary to have only the two choices of for or against someone's opinion.

To be frank with you, I think you are in the wrong.

You cannot learn the truth unless you hear what both parties have to say.

I knew that expressing your opinion to others and having them believe in your opinion was difficult.