「二人の」を含む例文一覧(10873)
＜前へ 1 2 .... 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218- 第二十三条の八 発行登録者、有価証券の売出しをする者、引受人、金融商品取引業者又は登録金融機関は、発行登録によりあらかじめその募集又は売出しが登録されている有価証券については、当該発行登録がその効力を生じており、かつ、当該有価証券の募集又は売出しごとにその発行価額又は売出価額の総額、発行条件又は売出条件その他の事項で公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定めるものを記載した書類（以下「発行登録追補書類」という。）が内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣に提出されていなければ、これを募集又は売出しにより取得させ、又は売り付けてはならない。ただし、有価証券の募集又は売出しごとの発行価額又は売出価額の総額が一億円未満の有価証券の募集又は売出しで内閣府令で定めるものについては、この限りでない。
Article 23-8 (1) The Issuer, a person who engages in Secondary Distribution of Securities, an Underwriter, a Financial Instruments Business Operator or a Registered Financial Institution shall not have another person acquire Securities for which the Shelf Registration has been made for their Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions, or sell such Securities to another person, through Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions, unless the Shelf Registration has already come into effect and, for each Public Offering or Secondary Distribution, a document which states the total issue price or total distribution amount, conditions of issuance or distribution of the Securities or other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors (hereinafter referred to as "Shelf Registration Supplements") has been submitted to the Prime Minister pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided however, that this shall not apply to Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance if the total issue price or total distribution amount of each Public Offering or Secondary Distribution is less than 100 million. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - １４ 第十二項後段の確認をした外国仲介業者は、同項の振替記載等を受ける者の各人別に、同項の確認をした旨を証する書類、当該確認に係る同項の確認書類その他の政令で定める書類を、当該外国仲介業者が当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受ける特定振替機関等の営業所等の長に（当該外国仲介業者が外国再間接口座管理機関である場合には、当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る外国間接口座管理機関（当該外国仲介業者が他の外国再間接口座管理機関において当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受ける場合には、当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る他の外国再間接口座管理機関及び当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る外国間接口座管理機関）を経由して当該外国間接口座管理機関が当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受ける特定振替機関等の営業所等の長に）提出しなければならない。
14) A foreign intermediary that has made a confirmation set forth in the second part of paragraph (12) shall, for each person who makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system set forth in the said paragraph, submit a document certifying that the confirmation set forth in the said paragraph has been made, the identification documents used for the said confirmation and any other document specified by a Cabinet Order, to the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry transfer institution through which the said foreign intermediary makes the said entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. (in the case where the said foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the foreign indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. (in the case where the said foreign intermediary makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. through another foreign further indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said foreign intermediary and such other foreign further indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.) to the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. through which the said foreign indirect account management institution makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - ８この条の規定の適用上、(a)「主たる種類の株式」とは、合計して法人の議決権の過半数を占める一又は二以上の種類の株式をいう。(b)「株式」には、株式の預託証券又は株式の信託受益証券を含む。(c)「公認の有価証券市場」とは、次のものをいう。(i)日本国の金融商品取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）に基づき設立された金融商品取引所又は認可金融商品取引業協会により設立された有価証券市場(ii)オランダの金融監督に関する法律第五条の二十六１（又は同法を承継する法律の関連規定）に規定する許可に基づき金融市場庁（又は同庁を承継する当局）による規制に従ってオランダにおいて設立された有価証券市場(iii)アイルランド証券取引所、ロンドン証券取引所、スイス証券取引所、ブリュッセル証券取引所、デュッセルドルフ証券取引所、フランクフルト証券取引所、ハンブルク証券取引所、香港証券取引所、ヨハネスブルク証券取引所、リスボン証券取引所、ルクセンブルク証券取引所、マドリード証券取引所、メキシコ証券取引所、ミラノ証券取引所、ニューヨーク証券取引所、パリ証券取引所、ソウル証券取引所、シンガポール証券取引所、ストックホルム証券取引所、シドニー証券取引所、トロント証券取引所、ウィーン証券取引所及びナスダック市場(iv)この条の規定の適用上、両締約国の権限のある当局が公認の有価証券市場として合意するその他の有価証券市場(d)「同等受益者」とは、次の(i)又は(ii)に規定するいずれかの者をいう。(i)この条約の特典が要求される締約国との間に租税に関する二重課税の回避及び脱税の防止のための条約（以下この条において「租税条約」という。）を有している国の居住者であって、次の(aa)から(cc)までに掲げる要件を満たすもの(aa)租税条約が実効的な情報の交換に関する規定を有すること。(bb)当該居住者が、租税条約における特典の制限に関する規定に基づき適格者に該当すること又は租税条約に当該規定がない場合には、租税条約に２の規定に相当する規定が含まれているとしたならば、当該居住者がその規定により適格者に該当するであろうとみられること。(cc)第十条３、第十一条３、第十二条、第十三条又は前条に定める所得に関し、当該居住者が、この条約の特典が要求されるこれらの規定に定める所得について租税条約の適用を受けたとしたならば、この条約に規定する税率以下の税率の適用を受けるであろうとみられること。(ii)２(a)から(d)までに掲げる適格者(e)「関連企業」とは、第九条１(a)又は(b)に規定する関係を有する企業をいう。(f)「総所得」とは、企業がその事業から取得する総収入の額から当該収入を得るために直接に要した費用の額を差し引いた残額をいう。
8. For the purposes of this Article: a) the term “principal class of shares” means the class or classes of shares of a company which in the aggregate represent a majority of the voting power of the company; b) the term “shares” shall include depository receipts of shares or trust certificates of shares; c) the term “recognised stock exchange” means: (i) any stock exchange established by a Financial Instruments Exchange or an approved-type financial instruments firms association under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law (Law No. 25 of 1948) of Japan; (ii) any regulated market established in the Netherlands subject to regulation by the Authority for the Financial Markets (or its successor) under a license as meant in paragraph 1 of Article 5:26 of the Act on Financial Supervision (or its successor) of the Netherlands; (iii) the Irish Stock Exchange, the London Stock Exchange, the Swiss Stock Exchange and the stock exchanges of Brussels, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hong Kong, Johannesburg, Lisbon, Luxembourg, Madrid, Mexico, Milan, New York, Paris, Seoul, Singapore, Stockholm, Sydney, Toronto and Vienna and the NASDAQ System; and (iv) any other stock exchange which the competent authorities of the Contracting States agree to recognise for the purposes of this Article; d) the term “equivalent beneficiary” means: (i) a resident of a state that has a convention for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion between that state and the Contracting State from which the benefits of this Convention are claimed such that: (aa) that convention contains provisions for effective exchange of information; (bb) that resident is a qualified person under the limitation on benefits provisions in that convention or, when there are no such provisions in that convention, would be a qualified person when that convention is read as including provisions corresponding to paragraph 2; and (cc) with respect to an item of income referred to in paragraph 3 of Article 10, paragraph 3 of Article 11 or Article 12, 13 or 20 that resident would be entitled under that convention to a rate of tax with respect to the particular class of income for which the benefits are being claimed under this Convention that is at least as low as the rate applicable under this Convention; or (ii) a qualified person by reason of subparagraph a), b), c) or d) of paragraph 2; e) the term “associated enterprises” means enterprises which have a relationship with each other as described in subparagraph a) or b) of paragraph 1 of Article 9; and f) the term “gross income” means the total revenues derived by an enterprise from its business, less the direct costs of obtaining such revenues. - 財務省 - それから、私でございますが、8月16日から21日まで米国に出張させていただきまして、今日の閣僚懇でもあらかたは報告をさせていただきましたが、ワシントンDC及びニューヨークを訪問して、バーナンキFRB（連邦準備制度理事会）議長、それからブレイナード財務次官、ボルカー大統領経済顧問、ご存じのようにこれは1970年代のFRBの議長でございますが、大変背の高い人でございますが、今度の金融規制改革法でいわゆるボルカールールというのをつくったオバマ大統領の経済顧問でございますが、こういった方ともお会いいたしました。米国ではもう皆さん方ご存じのように80年ぶり、まさに1929年に大恐慌がございましてね、それから色々あったわけでございますけれども、基本的にこの二、三十年、金融の規制緩和、あるいは経済のグローバル化、あるいは金融のグローバル化ということが非常に大きな潮流でございましたが、そういった中で80年ぶりの根本的な改革を、金融規制改革法が成立したばかりでございまして、私が向こうに行って、「コペルニクス的変化か」と言ったら、「いや、自見さん実はコペルニクス的変化だ」と、こう言ったアメリカの方もおられましたが、そういった大きな、皆さん方もボルカールールをはじめ世界の金融の潮流が非常に大きくアメリカを、まさに金融の本場であったアメリカで変わってきたわけでございまして、そういったところを金融（担当）大臣として実感としてアメリカの要人ともお会いしつつ、きちっと色々な意見を聞かせていただいたわけでございます。
From August 16 to 21, I went on a business trip to the United States. As already reported in brief at the informal gathering with Cabinet ministers today, I visited Washington D.C. and New York, where I met with Federal Reserve Board (FRB) Chairman Ben Bernanke, Treasury Under Secretary Lael Brainard and the President’s economic advisor Paul Volcker, just to name a few. Paul Volcker, who served as FRB Chairman during the 1970s, is the economic advisor to President Barack Obama who created the so-called “Volcker Rule” in the recent financial reform legislation. In the United States, financial deregulation and economic and financial globalization had been a massive trend over the past two or three decades, basically, since the Great Depression in 1929. It was against such a backdrop in the United States that the first radical financial reform legislation in 80 years was established very recently. I asked others during my stay in the United States as to whether it amounted to a change comparable to the Copernican Revolution, and some Americans responded that it was indeed that kind of change. The major global financial trend is changing in the United States, the leading country of finance. I gained firsthand knowledge of this, having met with leading figures of the United States as the Minister for Financial Services and listened to their various opinions. - 金融庁 - 第二十六条 前条第一項の規定により他人の占有する土地に立ち入つて測量又は調査を行なう者は、その測量又は調査を行なうにあたり、やむを得ない必要があつて、障害となる植物若しくはかき、さく等（以下「障害物」という。）を伐除しようとする場合又は当該土地に試掘若しくはボーリング若しくはこれらに伴う障害物の伐除（以下「試掘等」という。）を行なおうとする場合において、当該障害物又は当該土地の所有者及び占有者の同意を得ることができないときは、当該障害物の所在地を管轄する市町村長の許可を受けて当該障害物を伐除し、又は当該土地の所在地を管轄する都道府県知事の許可を受けて当該土地に試掘等を行なうことができる。この場合において、市町村長が許可を与えようとするときは障害物の所有者及び占有者に、都道府県知事が許可を与えようとするときは土地又は障害物の所有者及び占有者に、あらかじめ、意見を述べる機会を与えなければならない。
Article 26 (1) When individuals, who under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article conduct surveys or investigations by entering land in the possession of other individuals, intend under absolute necessity to fell or remove plants, fences, etc. impeding them (hereinafter referred to as "obstacles"), to conduct test drilling or boring of the land or to fell or remove obstacles for that purpose (hereinafter referred to as "test drilling etc."), if they cannot obtain the consent of the owners and possessors of the obstacles or land, they may fell or remove the obstacles by obtaining the permission of the Mayors of the municipalities that have jurisdiction over the land on which the obstacles are located, or they may conduct test drilling etc. by obtaining the permission of the Prefectural governors that have jurisdiction over said land. In such cases, when the Mayors of municipalities are in the process of giving permission, they must provide the owners and possessors of the obstacles an opportunity in advance to express their opinions; and when prefectural governors are in the process of getting permission, they must provide the owners and possessors of the obstacles an opportunity in advance to express their opinions. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - 法第百三十条第一項第四号に規定する主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げる事項とする。一組織変更後株式会社商品取引所が発行することができる株式の総数（組織変更後株 式会社商品取引所が種類株式発行会社である場合にあっては、各種類の組織変更時発 行株式の発行可能種類株式総数を含む。）二組織変更後株式会社商品取引所（組織変更後株式会社商品取引所が種類株式発行会 社である場合を除く。）が発行する組織変更時発行株式の内容として会社法第百七条 第一項各号に掲げる事項を定めているときは、当該株式の内容 三組織変更後株式会社商品取引所（組織変更後株式会社商品取引所が種類株式発行会 社である場合に限る。）が会社法第百八条第一項各号に掲げる事項につき内容の異な る組織変更時発行株式を発行することとしているときは、各種類の株式の内容（ある 種類の株式につき同条第三項の定款の定めがある場合において、当該定款の定めによ り組織変更後株式会社商品取引所が当該種類の株式の内容を定めていないときは、当 該種類の株式の内容の要綱） 四単元株式数についての定款の定めがあるときは、その単元株式数（組織変更後株式 会社商品取引所が種類株式発行会社である場合にあっては、各種類の株式の単元株式 数）五組織変更後株式会社商品取引所の定款に次に掲げる定めがあるときは、その規定 イ会社法第百三十九条第一項、第百四十条第五項又は第百四十五条第一号若しくは 第二号に規定する定款の定め ロ会社法第百六十四条第一項に規定する定款の定め ハ会社法第百六十七条第三項に規定する定款の定め ニ会社法第百六十八条第一項又は第百六十九条第二項に規定する定款の定め ホ会社法第百七十四条に規定する定款の定め ヘ会社法第三百四十七条に規定する定款の定め ト会社法施行規則第二十六条第一号又は第二号に規定する定款の定め 六株主名簿管理人を置く旨の定款の定めがあるときは、その氏名又は名称及び住所並 びに営業所 七定款に定められた事項（会社法第二百三条第一項第一号から第三号まで及び前各号 に掲げる事項を除く。）であって、当該組織変更後株式会社商品取引所に対して組織 - 77 - 変更時発行株式の引受けの申込みをしようとする者が当該者に対して通知することを 請求した事項
The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 130, paragraph 1, item 4 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) the total number of shares of stock which an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion can issue (in the case where an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a company issuing classified shares of stock, including the total number of the respective types of classified shares of stock that can be issued at the time of entity conversion); (ii) when the matters listed in the respective items of Article 107, paragraph 1 of the Company Act are specified as being the contents of Shares of Stock Issued upon Entity Conversion issued by an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion (excluding the case where an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a company issuing classified shares of stock), the contents of said shares of stock; (iii) when it is determined that an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion (limited to the case where an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a company issuing classified shares of stock) shall issue Shares of Stock Issued upon Entity Conversion with different contents with regard to the matters listed in the respective items of Article 108, paragraph 1 of the Company Act, the contents of the respective types of shares of stock (in the case where there are the provisions of the articles of incorporation set forth in paragraph 3 of the same Article with regard to a certain type of shares of stock, and when the contents of said type of shares of stock are not specified by an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion pursuant to said articles of incorporation, the outline of the contents of said type of shares of stock); (iv) when there are provisions of the articles of incorporation with regard to the number of shares per unit, said number of shares per unit (in the case where an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a company issuing classified shares of stock, the number of respective shares per unit); (v) when the articles of incorporation of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion have the following provisions, said provisions: (a) the provisions of the articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 139, paragraph 1, Article 140, paragraph 5, or Article 145, item 1 or item 2 of the Company Act; (b) the provisions of the articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 164, paragraph 1 of the Company Act; (c) the provisions of the articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 167, paragraph 3 of the Company Act; (d) the provisions of the articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 168, paragraph 1, or Article 169, paragraph 2 of the Company Act; (e) the provisions of the articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 174 of the Company Act; (f) the provisions of the articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 347 of the Company Act; (g) the provisions of the articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 26, item 1 or item 2 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Company Act; (vi) when there are provisions of the articles of incorporation to appoint an administrator of the shareholder register, the name and the address and the business office of that person; (vii) the matters specified by the articles of incorporation (excluding the matters listed in Article 203, paragraphs 1, items 1 to 3 inclusive of the Company Act and in the preceding items), and whose notification was requested by a person, who seeks to file an application to subscribe for the Shares of Stock Issued upon Entity Conversion to said Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion. - 経済産業省 - ２ 特例地域密着型介護サービス費の額は、当該地域密着型サービス又はこれに相当するサービスについて前条第二項各号の厚生労働大臣が定める基準により算定した費用の額（その額が現に当該地域密着型サービス又はこれに相当するサービスに要した費用（認知症対応型通所介護、小規模多機能型居宅介護、認知症対応型共同生活介護、地域密着型特定施設入居者生活介護及び地域密着型介護老人福祉施設入所者生活介護並びにこれらに相当するサービスに要した費用については、食事の提供に要する費用、居住に要する費用その他の日常生活に要する費用として厚生労働省令で定める費用を除く。）の額を超えるときは、当該現に地域密着型サービス又はこれに相当するサービスに要した費用の額とする。）の百分の九十に相当する額又は同条第四項の規定により市町村が定めた額を基準として、市町村が定める。
(2) The amount of an Exceptional Allowance for Community-Based Long-Term Care Service shall be provided by a Municipality based on the amount equivalent to 90 percent of the expenses calculated by standards determined by the Minister of Health, Labour, and Welfare as prescribed for each item of the preceding Article, paragraph (2) regarding said Community-Based Service or equivalent service (except when said calculated standard amount exceeds the actual expenses required for said Community-Based Service or equivalent service (excluding the expenses necessary to provide meals, residence, and other expenses as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as necessary for daily life with regard to the expenses required for Outpatient Long-Term Care for a Dementia Patient, Multifunctional Long-Term Care in a Small Group Home, Communal Daily Long-Term Care for a Dementia Patient, Daily Life Long-Term Care for a Person Admitted to a Community-Based Specified Facility, Admission to a Community-Based Facility for Preventive Daily Long-Term Care of the Elderly Covered by Public Aid, and equivalent services), said amount shall be the actual expenses required for said Community-Based Service or equivalent service), or the amount specified by the Municipality pursuant to the provision of paragraph (4) of the same Article. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - 四 認知症対応型共同生活介護、地域密着型特定施設入居者生活介護又は地域密着型介護老人福祉施設入所者生活介護につき第一項の申請があった場合において、当該市町村又は当該申請に係る事業所の所在地を含む区域（第百十七条第二項第一号の規定により当該市町村が定める区域とする。以下この号において「日常生活圏域」という。）における当該地域密着型サービスの利用定員の総数が、同条第一項の規定により当該市町村が定める市町村介護保険事業計画において定める当該市町村又は当該日常生活圏域の当該地域密着型サービスの必要利用定員総数に既に達しているか、又は当該申請に係る事業者の指定によってこれを超えることになると認めるとき、その他の当該市町村介護保険事業計画の達成に支障を生ずるおそれがあると認めるとき。
(iv) in a case when an appointment as service provider as set forth in paragraph (1) was filed for Communal Daily Long-Term Care for a Dementia Patient, Daily Life Long-Term Care for a Person Admitted to a Community-Based Specified Facility, or Admission to a Community-Based Facility for Preventive Daily Long-Term Care of the Elderly Covered by Public Aid, when it is determined that the total capacity of users of said Community-Based Service in said Municipality or in the area including the location of the Business Office pertaining to said application (which means an area provided by said Municipality pursuant to the provisions of Article 117, paragraph (2), item (i); herein referred to as "Daily Activities Area" in this item) has been reached or is it determined that said total number will be exceeded by the appointment as service provider pertaining to said application for the total capacity of necessary users for said Community-Based Service in said Municipality or said Daily Activities Area provided by Municipal Insured Long-Term Care Service Plan provided by said Municipality pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article, or when it is determined that it is likely to cause problems with the accomplishment of said Municipal Insured Long-Term Care Service Plan. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - 第八条の三 第七条の二第一項、第三項から第五項まで、第七項から第十三項まで、第十七項、第十八項及び第二十一項の規定は、第八条第一項第一号（不当な取引制限に相当する行為をする場合に限る。）又は第二号（不当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定又は国際的契約をする場合に限る。）の規定に違反する行為が行われた場合に準用する。この場合において、第七条の二第一項中「事業者が」とあるのは「事業者団体が」と、「当該事業者に対し」とあるのは「当該事業者団体の構成事業者（事業者の利益のためにする行為を行う役員、従業員、代理人その他の者が構成事業者である場合には、当該事業者を含む。以下この条において「特定事業者」という。）に対し」と、同条第四項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、同条第五項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「をやめた者（次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめた者（当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動」と、同条第七項中「納付すべき事業者」とあるのは「納付すべき特定事業者」と、「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第八項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第九項中「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第十項及び第十一項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、同条第十二項中「行つた事業者」とあるのは「行つた特定事業者」と、「当該事業者が行つた」とあるのは「当該特定事業者が行つた」と、「、当該事業者」とあるのは「、当該特定事業者」と、「当該事業者がした」とあるのは「当該事業者団体がした」と、「他の事業者」とあるのは「他の特定事業者」と、「第一項に規定する違反行為をする」とあるのは「当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動を行う」と、「をやめる」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめる」と、同条第十三項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、「した違反行為」とあるのは「行つた同項第一号の規定による報告」と、同条第十七項及び第十八項中「第四項から第六項まで、第八項、第九項又は第十四項」とあるのは「第四項、第五項、第八項又は第九項」と読み替えるものとする。
Article 8-3 The provisions of paragraphs 1, 3 to 5 inclusive, 7 to 13 inclusive, 17, 18 and 21 of Article 7-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an act is committed in violation of the provisions of item 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 8 (limited to cases of committing an act which falls under unreasonable restraint of trade) or item 2 thereof (limited to cases of entering into an international agreement or an international contract which contains such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade). In this case, in paragraph 1 of Article 7-2, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade association"; and the term "order the said entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "order the constituent entrepreneur of the said trade association (including the relevant entrepreneur when an officer, employee, agent, or any other person acting for the benefit of an entrepreneur is a constituent entrepreneur; hereinafter referred to as "specified entrepreneur" in this Article)"; in paragraph 4 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 5 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "had discontinued the business activities that constituted the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation of the business activities that constituted the relevant violation is less than two years)"; in paragraph 7 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 8 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 9 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneur that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; and the term " has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraphs 10 and 11 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 12 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "committed by the relevant entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "committed by the relevant trade association"; the term "commit the violation provided for in paragraph 1" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effect the business activities that constituted the relevant violation"; and the term "discontinuing" shall be deemed to be replaced with "discontinuing the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 13 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; and the term "violation committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "report submitted pursuant to the provisions of item 1 of the same paragraph"; and in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the said Article, the term "paragraphs 1, 4 to 6 inclusive, 8, 9, and 14" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 8, and 9". - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - １ 商品取引清算機関は、法第百七十九条第一項の規定に基づき取次者（同項第一号ロ に規定する取次者をいう。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）、委託者（同号 ロに規 定する委託者をいう。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）、取次委託者（同号 ニに規 定する取次委託者をいう。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）、清算取次者（同項第二 号 ロに規定する清算取次者をいう。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）、清算取次委 託者（同号 ロに規定する清算取次委託者をいう。以下この条及び次条において同じ。） 又は清算取次者に対する委託者（同号 ニに規定する清算取次者に対する委託者をいう。 以下この条及び次条において同じ。）から取引証拠金の預託を受けるときは、次の各号 に掲げる場合の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める者を代理人として当該取引証拠金の預託 を受けなければならない。
(1) When receiving a deposit of clearing margins, based on the provisions of Article 179, paragraph 1 of the Act, from an Intermediary (which means an Intermediary prescribed in Article 179, paragraph 1, item 1, (b) of the same paragraph; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article), a Customer (which means a Customer prescribed in (b) of the same item; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article), an Intermediation Customer (which means an Intermediation Customer prescribed in (d) of the same item; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article), a Clearing Intermediary (which means a Clearing Intermediary prescribed in item 2, (b) of the same paragraph; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article), a Clearing Intermediary Customer (which means a Clearing Intermediary Customer prescribed in (b) of the same item; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article), or a Customer of a Clearing Intermediary (which means a Customer of a Clearing Intermediary prescribed in (d) of the same item; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article), a Commodity Clearing Organization shall designate the person prescribed in said items, respectively, as an agent, and receive the deposit of said clearing margin corresponding to the categories set forth in the following items, respectively: - 経済産業省 - ５ 法第六十八条の八十九第二項に規定する国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債に係る平均負債残高から控除する政令で定めるところにより計算した特定債券現先取引等に係る平均負債残高は、当該連結法人に係る国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債のうち、特定債券現先取引等（法第六十八条の八十九第四項第八号に規定する特定債券現先取引等をいう。次項及び第八項において同じ。）に係るものに係る平均負債残高（当該平均負債残高が当該特定債券現先取引等に係る資産に係る平均資産残高（当該連結事業年度の当該資産の帳簿価額の平均的な残高として合理的な方法により計算した金額をいう。次項において同じ。）を超える場合には、当該平均資産残高。第八項において「調整後平均負債残高」という。）とする。
(5) The average balance of liabilities pertaining to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. which is calculated as specified by a Cabinet Order and is to be deducted from the average balance of liabilities regarding the liabilities owed to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. prescribed in Article 68-89(2) of the Act shall be the average balance of liabilities regarding the liabilities owed to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. related to the said consolidated corporation which pertain to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. (meaning a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. prescribed in Article 68-89(4)(viii) of the Act; the same shall apply in the next paragraph and paragraph (8)) (where the said average balance of liabilities exceeds the average balance of assets regarding assets pertaining to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. (the average balance of assets shall mean the amount calculated by a reasonable method as the average balance of the said assets' book value for the relevant consolidated business year; the same shall apply in the next paragraph), such calculated average balance of liabilities shall be the said average balance of assets; such average balance of assets shall be referred to as the "average balance of liabilities after adjustment" in paragraph (8)). - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - ５ 法第六十六条の五第二項に規定する国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債に係る平均負債残高から控除する政令で定めるところにより計算した特定債券現先取引等に係る平均負債残高は、当該内国法人に係る国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債のうち、特定債券現先取引等（同条第四項第八号に規定する特定債券現先取引等をいう。次項及び第八項において同じ。）に係るものに係る平均負債残高（当該平均負債残高が当該特定債券現先取引等に係る資産に係る平均資産残高（当該事業年度の当該資産の帳簿価額の平均的な残高として合理的な方法により計算した金額をいう。次項において同じ。）を超える場合には、当該平均資産残高。第八項において「調整後平均負債残高」という。）とする。
(5) The average balance of liabilities pertaining to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. which is calculated as specified by a Cabinet Order and is to be deducted from the average balance of liabilities regarding the liabilities owed to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. prescribed in Article 66-5(2) of the Act shall be the average balance of liabilities regarding the liabilities owed to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. related to the said domestic corporation which pertain to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. (meaning a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. prescribed in Article 66-5(4)(viii) of the Act; the same shall apply in the next paragraph and paragraph (8)) (where the said average balance of liabilities exceeds the average balance of assets regarding assets pertaining to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. (the average balance of assets shall mean the amount calculated by a reasonable method as the average balance of the said assets' book value for the relevant business year; the same shall apply in the next paragraph), such calculated average balance of liabilities shall be the said average balance of assets; such average balance of assets shall be referred to as the "average balance of liabilities after adjustment" in paragraph (8)). - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - アフリカの成長は引き続き堅調であるが、依然として食料やエネルギー価格の高騰を含むショック影響を受けやすい。これらの価格の高騰は、最も脆弱な人々にとって大きな問題。高く安定した成長が広範な基礎を有する開発及びミレニアム開発目標を達成するために不可欠であり、アフリカへの援助倍増する公約を踏まえつつ、我々は、アフリカ諸国と協働し、持続可能な民間セクター主導の成長を進していくことにコミット。我々は、各国の成長戦略を支援する際、「アフリカにおける民間セクター主導成長のためのＧ８アクションプラン」における二つの柱、すなわち、①投資環境の改善、②金融セクタの強化、に支援の焦点を当てることを提唱。この点に関し、我々は、国境を横断する運輸回廊等、信性のあるインフラ整備のための支援を拡大しつつある。中小企業の能力向上、及び貿易のための援等を通じてアフリカ諸国の貿易促進のための努力、を支援。資源国における長期の財政規律等の良財政ガバナンスや、採掘産業透明性イニシアティブ（EITI）をより多くの国が実施することの重要性を確認さらに、公式経済へのアクセス向上の必要性を強調。我々は、地場金融機関の能力強化、アフリカのり手に対する現地通貨建て資金供給の促進、アフリカ諸国における現地債券市場の育成、及び外国らの送金の円滑化を助けていく。
Growth in Africa remains robust, though it is still susceptible to shocks, including rising food and energy prices, which pose great challenges to the most vulnerable populations. As high, stable growth is critical to attaining broad-based development and the Millennium Development Goals, we are committed to working together with African countries to foster sustainable, private sector led growth, building on our commitments to double aid to Africa. In support of country specific growth strategies, we propose to focus on two pillars in our ''G-8 Action Plan for Private Sector Led Growth in Africa'': improving the investment climate; and strengthening the financial sector. In this regard, we are increasing contributions for the development of reliable infrastructures, such as cross-border transport corridors. We will support capacity building of small- and medium-sized enterprises and help African countries' efforts to promote their capacity to trade including through Aid for Trade. We affirm the importance of good financial governance, including long-term fiscal discipline for resource rich countries, and of broader implementation of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Furthermore, we underline the necessity of enhancing a greater access to the formal economy. We will help strengthen local financial institutions, promote local currency financing for African borrowers, enhance local bond market development in African countries, and facilitate remittance flows. - 財務省 - 私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。
I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business. - 金融庁 - また、そういった意味で、非常に金融が実体経済以上にふくらむ、それがなおかつ、一つの金融機関のリスクの中で、リスクはもうおさまらなくなった、リーマン・ショックなんか典型ですね。国全体の経済、あるいは世界全体の経済に広範な影響を与えるというようなことでございますから、そういった中で、1929年はそれぞれの経済がブロック化しまして、それが第二次世界大戦の遠因だという方もおられますけれども、その辺の苦しい反省を踏まえて、Ｇ８、Ｇ20ということで、何とか英知を集めて、今度のバーゼルもまとまったし、今度はぜひ、これがソウルサミットでまとまっていただきたいと思いますけれども、世界の経済のグローバル化と同時に、やっぱり人類は1929年の後の世界大恐慌よりは、少し学習をしたと私は思っていますし、そういうことも視野に入れつつ、企業を支える金融、あるいは円の円滑化、あるいはリスク管理をきちっとやるというようなことは、これは原則でございますし、なおかつ金融業というのは、この前も申しましたように、基本的には信頼関係でございますから、顧客の方だとか、あるいは金融機関に関する信頼がないと、金融機関というのはうまく機能しないというのはもう皆様方、専門家でございますからよくご存じでございますから、そういったことを踏まえて、非常に難しい時代の金融の舵取りでございます。世界が今非常に金融も変動しておりまして、しかし、そういったときでも、皆様の知恵もかりながら、国民の声もかりながら、そして日本一国の経済ではございませんから、まさに非常に経済のグローバル化、アメリカの経済も中国の経済も、まさに結びついているわけでございますから、そういったことも視野に入れつつ、しっかり責任を果たしていきたいというふうに思っております。
In this context, the financial sector has ballooned more than the real economy, and risks can no longer be contained within the risks of one financial institution. The Lehman Brothers shockwave was a typical example of this. It has a broad impact on the national economy and the global economy. Back in 1929, economies were organized into economic blocks, which became a remote cause of the Second World War according to some people. Having learned a bitter lesson from the War, G8 and G20 mobilized their wisdom and reached a consensus on Basel III as well. I am looking forward to seeing an accord reached on Basel III at the upcoming Seoul Summit. I believe that the human race has learned a few lessons since the Great Depression after 1929 in conjunction with the globalization of economies around the world. With this in mind, the general rule is to facilitate the financial sector that supports companies, as well as the yen, and properly execute risk management. As relationship of trust is fundamental to financial businesses, financial institutions do not function properly if customers lack confidence in financial institutions, as you are well aware. Taking this into account, we are steering the financial sector at an extremely difficult time. Even at times like this when the financial sector is undergoing dramatic change on a global scale, we are committed to fulfilling our responsibilities properly while seeking your wisdom and people’s opinions, bearing in mind that Japan’s economy is not isolated but interlinked with American and Chinese economies as well due to globalization. - 金融庁 - １８ 平成十一年四月一日以後に国内において特定振替国債等の償還（買入消却を含む。以下この項において同じ。）又は利息（第十二項に規定する分離利息振替国債に係るものに限る。以下この条において同じ。）の支払によりその償還金（買入消却が行われる場合にあつては、その買入れの対価。以下この条において同じ。）又は利息の支払を受ける者（法人税法別表第一に掲げる法人その他の政令で定めるものを除く。）は、その者の氏名又は名称及び住所その他の財務省令で定める事項を記載した告知書を、その償還又は利息の支払を受ける際、その償還金又は利息の支払の取扱者に（当該支払の取扱者が外国仲介業者である場合には、当該外国仲介業者（当該外国仲介業者が外国再間接口座管理機関である場合において、当該外国仲介業者が外国間接口座管理機関において当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受けるときは当該外国仲介業者及び当該外国間接口座管理機関とし、当該外国仲介業者が他の外国再間接口座管理機関において当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受けるときは当該外国仲介業者、当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る他の外国再間接口座管理機関及び当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る外国間接口座管理機関とする。）を経由して当該外国仲介業者（当該外国仲介業者が外国再間接口座管理機関である場合には、当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る外国間接口座管理機関）が当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受ける特定振替機関等の営業所等の長に）提出しなければならない。この場合において、当該告知書の提出をする者は、当該支払の取扱者にその者の確認書類を提示しなければならないものとし、当該支払の取扱者は、当該告知書に記載されている氏名又は名称及び住所を当該確認書類により確認しなければならないものとする。
(18) Where, in Japan on or after April, 1, 1999, a person (excluding the corporations listed in Appended Table 1 of the Corporation Tax Act and any other person specified by a Cabinet Order) receives, due to the redemption (including retirement by purchase; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc., payment of redemption money (or a consideration for the purchase in the case of retirement by purchase; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), or receives, due to interest payment pertaining to specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. (limited to interest on coupon-only book-entry transfer national government bonds prescribed in paragraph (12); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), payment of interest, such person shall, upon receiving the redemption or interest payment, submit a written notice stating the person's name and address and any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance to the person in charge of handling payment of redemption money or interest (in the case where the said person in charge of handling payment is a foreign intermediary, submission shall be made via the said foreign intermediary (in the case where the said foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution, and the said foreign intermediary makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. through a foreign indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said foreign intermediary and the said foreign indirect account management institution; in the case where the said foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution, and the said foreign intermediary makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. through another foreign further indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via [1] the said foreign intermediary, [2] such other foreign further indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc., and [3] the foreign indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.) to the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry transfer institution through which the said foreign intermediary (in the case where the said foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution: the foreign indirect account management pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.) makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.) In this case, the person who submits the said written notice shall present the person's identification document to the said person in charge of handling payment, and the said person in charge of handling payment shall confirm, by the said identification document, the person's name and address stated in the written notice. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - 第百三十二条の十 民事訴訟に関する手続における申立てその他の申述（以下「申立て等」という。）のうち、当該申立て等に関するこの法律その他の法令の規定により書面等（書面、書類、文書、謄本、抄本、正本、副本、複本その他文字、図形等人の知覚によって認識することができる情報が記載された紙その他の有体物をいう。以下同じ。）をもってするものとされているものであって、最高裁判所の定める裁判所に対してするもの（当該裁判所の裁判長、受命裁判官、受託裁判官又は裁判所書記官に対してするものを含む。）については、当該法令の規定にかかわらず、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電子情報処理組織（裁判所の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。以下同じ。）と申立て等をする者又は第三百九十九条第一項の規定による処分の告知を受ける者の使用に係る電子計算機とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。第三百九十七条から第四百一条までにおいて同じ。）を用いてすることができる。ただし、督促手続に関する申立て等であって、支払督促の申立てが書面をもってされたものについては、この限りでない。
Article 132-10 (1) In the case of a petition or any other statement to be filed or made in the procedures for civil suits (hereinafter referred to as a "petition, etc."), which shall be filed or made, pursuant to the provisions of this Code or other laws and regulations concerning such petition, etc., by means of a document, etc. (meaning a document, a transcript, extract, authenticated copy or duplicate of a document or a duplicate of a bill or note, or any other paper or other tangible object on which information recognizable to human perception such as characters and shapes is stated; the same shall apply hereinafter) to the court specified by the Supreme Court (including one filed or made to the presiding judge, authorized judge, commissioned judge or court clerk of such court), notwithstanding the provisions of said laws and regulations, as provided for by the Rules of the Supreme Court, the petition, etc. may be filed or made by means of an electronic data processing system (meaning an electronic data processing system wherein the computer (including input-output devices; the same shall apply hereinafter) used in the court is connected, by way of telecommunication lines, to the computer used by the person who files or makes the petition, etc. or person who receives a notice of a disposition under the provision of Article 399(1); the same shall apply in Article 397 to Article 401); provided, however, that this shall not apply to a petition, etc. on the demand procedure where a petition for demand for payment is filed or made by means of a document. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - 第七十三条 自動車（第三項に規定するものを除く。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の所有者は、当該自動車が最初の自動車登録ファイルへの登録（道路運送車両法第四条の規定による自動車登録ファイルへの登録をいう。以下同じ。）を受けるとき（同法第三条に規定する軽自動車（同法第五十八条第一項に規定する検査対象外軽自動車を除く。）にあっては当該自動車が最初の自動車検査証の交付（同法第六十条第一項又は第七十一条第四項の規定による自動車検査証の交付をいう。以下同じ。）を受けるとき、同法第五十八条第一項に規定する検査対象外軽自動車にあっては当該自動車が最初の車両番号の指定（同法第九十七条の三第一項の規定による車両番号の指定をいう。以下同じ。）を受けるとき）までに、当該自動車に係る再資源化等料金（次の表の上欄に掲げる自動車の区分に応じ、それぞれ当該自動車に係る特定再資源化等物品を第二十一条の規定により引き取るべき自動車製造業者等が第三十四条第一項の規定により公表した同表の中欄に掲げる料金（当該自動車製造業者等が存しない場合又は当該自動車製造業者等を確知することができない場合（次項各号において「製造業者不存在の場合」という。）にあっては、指定再資源化機関が第百八条第一項の規定により公表した同表の下欄に掲げる料金）をいう。第三項において同じ。）に相当する額の金銭を再資源化等預託金として資金管理法人に対し預託しなければならない。
Article 73 (1) The owner of a Vehicle (except for those prescribed in Paragraph 3; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph and the next paragraph) shall deposit with the Deposit Management Entity as a Recycling, etc. a deposit in an amount equivalent to the Recycling, etc. Fee for said Vehicle (the fee indicated in the middle column of the following Table made public pursuant to the provisions of Article 34, Paragraph 1 by the Vehicle Manufacturer, etc., which has to collect the Parts Specified for Recycling, etc. relating to said Vehicle pursuant to the classification of the Vehicle indicated in the upper column of the same Table (when there is no Vehicle Manufacturer, etc. or when the Vehicle Manufacturer, etc. cannot be notified (referred to in each of the following items as "When There is No Manufacturer"; the same shall apply hereinafter); the fee indicated in the lower column made public by the Designated Recycling Organization as prescribed in Article 108, Paragraph 1); the same shall apply in Paragraph 3) by the time said Vehicle has been first registered in the Vehicle Registration File (referred to as registration in Vehicle Registration File pursuant to the provisions of the Road Transport Vehicle Act, Article 4; the same shall apply hereinafter), for a light Vehicle prescribed in Article 3 of the same Act (except for Vehicles outside the scope of the inspections prescribed in Article 58, Paragraph 1 of the same Act) when the initial vehicle inspection certificate for said Vehicle (referred to as a delivery of vehicle inspection certificates provided in Article 60, Paragraph 1 or Article 71, Paragraph 4 of the same Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) has been delivered, for light Vehicles which are outside the scope of inspections prescribed in Article 58, Paragraph 1 of the same Act, when the Vehicle number of the Vehicle has been initially designated (indicated as a designation of Vehicle number as prescribed in Article 97-3, Paragraph 1 of the same Act; the same shall apply hereinafter in Paragraph 3). - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - ６ 会社法第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は前項において準用する同法第七百七条の特別代理人の選任について、同法第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は前項において準用する同法第七百十一条第三項の特定信託管理者の辞任について、同法第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は前項において準用する同法第七百十三条の特定信託管理者の解任について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。
(6) The provisions of Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to appointment of a special agent set forth in Article 707 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph, the provisions of Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the resignation of a Specified Trust Administrator under Article 711(3) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph, and the provisions of Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the dismissal of a Specified Trust Administrator under Article 713 of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - ２ 職員が、任命権者の要請に応じ特別職に属する国家公務員、地方公務員又は公庫の予算及び決算に関する法律（昭和二十六年法律第九十九号）第一条に規定する公庫その他その業務が国の事務若しくは事業と密接な関連を有する法人のうち人事院規則で定めるものに使用される者（以下この項において「特別職国家公務員等」という。）となるため退職し、引き続き特別職国家公務員等として在職した後、引き続いて当該退職を前提として職員として採用された場合（一の特別職国家公務員等として在職した後、引き続き一以上の特別職国家公務員等として在職し、引き続いて当該退職を前提として職員として採用された場合を含む。）において、当該退職までの引き続く職員としての在職期間（当該退職前に同様の退職（以下この項において「先の退職」という。）、特別職国家公務員等としての在職及び職員としての採用がある場合には、当該先の退職までの引き続く職員としての在職期間を含む。以下この項において「要請に応じた退職前の在職期間」という。）中に前項各号のいずれかに該当したときは、これに対し同項に規定する懲戒処分を行うことができる。職員が、第八十一条の四第一項又は第八十一条の五第一項の規定により採用された場合において、定年退職者等となつた日までの引き続く職員としての在職期間（要請に応じた退職前の在職期間を含む。）又は第八十一条の四第一項若しくは第八十一条の五第一項の規定によりかつて採用されて職員として在職していた期間中に前項各号のいずれかに該当したときも、同様とする。
(2) When an official leaves government position, upon the request of an appointer to be a national public servant in the special service, a local public officer, or an employee of a public financial corporation as provided for in Article 1 of the Act on Budget and Settlement of Public Financial Corporations (Act No. 99 of 1951), or any other juridical person provided for by rules of the National Personnel Authority among those whose business is related closely to national affairs or undertakings (hereinafter referred to as "a national public servant in the special service, etc." in this paragraph), and then, after holding office without interruption as a national public servant in the special service, etc., is employed without interruption as an official on premise of the said leaving of government position (including the case of an official who holds one or more offices without interruption as a national public servant in the special service, etc. after holding another office as a national public servant in the special service, etc., and then is employed as an official on the premise of the said leaving of government position), in the cases where, during the continuous period of holding office as an official up to the said leaving of government position (in the case of an official who leaves government position similarly (hereinafter referred to as "the previous leaving of government position" in this paragraph) before the said leaving of government position, holds office as a national public servant in the special service, etc., and is employed as an official, including the continuous period of holding office as an official up to the previous leaving of government position, hereinafter referred to as "the period of holding office before leaving of government position responding to the request" in this paragraph), he/she falls under any of the items in the preceding paragraph, any of the disciplinary actions provided for in the same paragraph may be taken. When an official who is employed pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 of Article 81-4 or paragraph 1 of Article 81-5 falls under any of the items of the preceding paragraph during the continuous period of holding office as an official up to the day when he/she has become a person who has mandatorily retired, etc. (including the period of holding office before leaving of government position responding to the request), or the period that he/she has held office as an official after the employment pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 of Article 81-4 or paragraph 1 of Article 81-5, the same shall apply as well. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - 第百十五条の十六 市町村長は、指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者が、第百十五条の十一第五項の規定により当該指定を行うに当たって付された条件に従わず、当該指定に係る事業所の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第百十五条の十三第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数若しくは同条第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに従事する従業者に関する基準を満たしておらず、又は同条第二項若しくは第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準に従って適正な指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者に対し、期限を定めて、第百十五条の十一第五項の規定により当該指定を行うに当たって付された条件に従い、第百十五条の十三第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数の従業者を有し、若しくは同条第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに従事する従業者に関する基準を遵守し、又は同条第二項若しくは第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。
Article 115-16 (1) A mayor of a Municipality, when it is determined that a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care does not act in compliance with the provision provided when providing said appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 115-11, paragraph (5), does not meet the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in Article 115-13, paragraph (1) or the fixed minimum number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph or standards concerning employees that engage in Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care provided by paragraph (4) of the same Article, with regard to knowledge, skill, or number of employees of the Business Office pertaining to said appointment as service provider, or when it is determined that said Community-Based Preventive Long-Term Care Service does not operate an appropriate Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care in accordance with standards concerning effective support methods for Prevention of Long-Term Care pertaining to a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care and standards concerning facilities and management of the business of Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in paragraph (2) or paragraph (4) of the same Article, may specify a due date and recommend to said Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care to act in compliance with the provisions provided when determining said appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 115-11, paragraph (5), to comply with the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in Article 115-13, paragraph (1), to employ the number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph, to comply with standards concerning employees that engage in Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, and to comply with standards concerning effective support methods for Prevention of Long-Term Care pertaining to a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care and standards concerning facilities and management of the business of Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed by paragraph (2) and paragraph (4) of the same Article. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - 第十三条 次に掲げる施設（以下「住所地特例対象施設」という。）に入所又は入居（以下この条において「入所等」という。）をすることにより当該住所地特例対象施設の所在する場所に住所を変更したと認められる被保険者（第三号に掲げる施設に入所することにより当該施設の所在する場所に住所を変更したと認められる被保険者にあっては、老人福祉法第十一条第一項第一号の規定による入所措置がとられた者に限る。以下この条において「住所地特例対象被保険者」という。）であって、当該住所地特例対象施設に入所等をした際他の市町村（当該住所地特例対象施設が所在する市町村以外の市町村をいう。）の区域内に住所を有していたと認められるものは、第九条の規定にかかわらず、当該他の市町村が行う介護保険の被保険者とする。ただし、二以上の住所地特例対象施設に継続して入所等をしている住所地特例対象被保険者であって、現に入所等をしている住所地特例対象施設（以下この項及び次項において「現入所施設」という。）に入所等をする直前に入所等をしていた住所地特例対象施設（以下この項において「直前入所施設」という。）及び現入所施設のそれぞれに入所等をすることにより直前入所施設及び現入所施設のそれぞれの所在する場所に順次住所を変更したと認められるもの（次項において「特定継続入所被保険者」という。）については、この限りでない。
Article 13 (1) An Insured Person for whom it is determined that his or her domicile has changed to a location of one of the following facilities (herein referred to as "Facility Subject to Domicile Exception") and is located by admission or residence (herein referred to as "Admission, etc.") in said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception (an Insured Person for whom it is determined that his or her domicile has changed to a location where said Facility is located by moving into said Facility as listed in item (iii) is limited to a person for whom the admission measures are pursuant to the provisions of Article 11, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Public Aid for the Aged Act; hereinafter referred to as "Insured Person Subject to Domicile Exception" in this Article) and for whom it is determined to have had domicile in another Municipality (a Municipality other than the Municipality where said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception is located) at the time of moving in for Admission, etc., at said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception, shall be an Insured Person of Long-Term Care Insurance provided by said other Municipality of prior domicile, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9; however, provided that this provision shall not apply to an Insured Person Subject to Domicile Exception who moved in for Admission, etc., into two or more of a said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception, and said Person is determined to have moved consecutively from one said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception in which said Insured Person was admitted immediately prior to the said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception where said Insured Person is currently residing for Admission, etc. (herein referred to as the "Facility of First Prior Admission of an Insured Person" in this paragraph) into a Facility Subject to Domicile Exception in which said Insured Person is currently residing (herein referred to as the "Facility of Current Admission of an Insured Person" in this paragraph and the following paragraph) (collectively herein referred to as "Specified Continuous Admission of an Insured Person" in the following paragraph): - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - 特に私の場合は民間の金融機関を所掌しているわけでございますから、金融庁といたしましても、復興に向けた（取組みを）金融がしっかり下支えするべく、震災特例を設けた金融機能強化法、これは私は金融立法としては異例なことだと思っておりますが、信用金庫、信用組合を含め、しばらく経っても不良債権が残っていれば、預金保険機構で請け負いましょうという枠組みの法律でございますから、そういった意味では、当然、自己資本もしっかり経営者の判断で積んでいただきたいということも言っておりますので、そういった意味では、私はまさに震災特例の金融機能強化法を国会の全会派のご協力をいただきまして作らせていただきましたし、また、「個人債務者の私的整理（に関する）ガイドライン」、それから産業復興機構、東日本大震災（事業者）再生支援機構、これは国会で大きく問題が起きた二重ローンの問題、これは実は事務局（職員）の多くは金融庁から行かせていただいておりまして、そういったことで金融庁としては全力を挙げて復旧復興に努めさせていただいているつもりでございますが、各種の復興支援策の積極的かつ効果的な活用を促すなど、引き続き、被災地の復興支援に全力で取り組んでまいりたいと思うと同時に、ぜひ強調したいのは、金融機関も今回非常によく協力していただけたと思っております。
I have jurisdiction over private financial institutions, so the FSA has put into force the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, so as to ensure that finance firmly supports recovery efforts. Unusually for a financial act, this act provides a framework under which Deposit Insurance Corporation takes over non-performing loans that are held by Shinkin banks and credit cooperatives after the passage of a certain period of time. Therefore, this act naturally calls on the managers of financial institutions to build up capital based on their own judgment. We enacted the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, with the support of all political parties and groups, and also drew up the Guidelines of Workout for Restructuring Debt Owed by Individual Debtors. In addition, prefectural industrial reconstruction organizations and Rehabilitation Support Organization for Companies Damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake were established in order to resolve the double loan problem, which has become a major issue in the Diet. Many members of the latter organization's secretariat come from the FSA. In that sense, I believe that the FSA is making every possible effort toward restoration and recovery. The FSA will continue to do its utmost to support the recovery of the disaster-stricken areas through such activities as encouraging the active and effective use of various recovery support measures. At the same time, I would like to stress that financial institutions have provided very vigorous cooperation. - 金融庁
- 財務省
- Copyright(C) 財務省
※この記事は財務省ホームページの情報を転載しております。内容には仮訳のものも含まれており、今後内容に変更がある可能性がございます。
財務省は利用者が当ホームページの情報を用いて行う一切の行為について、何ら責任を負うものではありません。
- 金融庁
- Copyright(C) 2024 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
- 経済産業省
- Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
- ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
