「Filing」を含む例文一覧(6672)

＜前へ 1 2 .... 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 次へ＞
  • A party who has duly filed an application for a patent or for a utility certificate or for the protection of a utility model in any of the countries that are members of the International Union for the Protection of Industrial Property or affiliated with the World Trade Organisation, in accordance with the laws in force in that country or in accordance with treaties concluded between two or more of the aforementioned countries, shall enjoy a right of priority within the Netherlands and the Netherlands Antilles during a period of 12 months from the filing date of the application with regard to the acquisition of a patent for the subject matter in respect of which the protection referred to above has been applied for.
    工業所有権保譲のための国際同盟の加盟国又は世界貿易機関の加入国である何れかの国において，その国で施行されている法律に従って又は前記諸国の内の2以上の国の間で締結された条約に従って，正規に特許又は実用新案証又は実用新案保護の出願を行った当事者は，前記の保護が出願されている主題について特許を取得することに関し，その出願の出願日から12月の期間においては，オランダ及びオランダ領アンチル諸島において優先権を享有する。 - 特許庁
  • Insofar as a patent granted in accordance with this Kingdom Act relates to an invention in respect of which a European patent has been granted to the same inventor or his successor in title and the date of filing or, as the case may be, the priority date of the patent applications concerned are the same, the former patent shall cease to have the legal effects specified in Articles 53, 53a, 71 and 73 in the Netherlands or in the Netherlands Antilles insofar as it protects the same invention as the European patent or in the Netherlands insofar as a Community patent is involved, as from the date on which:
    本法に従って付与された特許が，同一の発明者又はその権原承継人に付与された欧州特許に係る発明に関するものであり，かつ，関連するそれらの特許出願の出願日又は場合により優先日が同一である場合において，前者の特許が欧州特許と同一発明を保護しているときは，その特許は，第53条，第53a条，第71条及び第73条に示される法的効力をオランダ又はオランダ領アンチル諸島において，又は共同体特許に関するものである場合はオランダにおいて，次の日から効力を有さないものとする。 - 特許庁
  • The entry made on the filing of an opposition, a request for administrative re-examination and a request for termination, cf. Part IV, shall contain: (i) the name or firm name and postal address of the opponent or the person having submitted the request, respectively, (ii) if the opponent or the person having submitted the request is represented by an agent, the name or firm name and postal address of the agent, (iii) the date of the opposition or the request for administrative re-examination or termination, and (iv) with respect to a request for termination, the number of the Community patent or European patent which is considered to cover the same invention.
    異議申立，行政再審査請求及び特許終了の請求(第IV部参照)についての登録には，次の事項を含める。(i) 異議申立人又は請求当事者各々の名称又は企業名及び郵便宛先(ii) 異議申立人又は請求当事者が代理人を選任しているときは，代理人の名称又は事務所名及び郵便宛先 (iii) 異議申立又は行政再審査若しくは終了の請求日，及び (iv) 終了請求については，同一の発明を対象としているとみなされる共同体特許又は欧州特許の番号 - 特許庁
  • Section 40 shall apply to the division of an application published prior to January 1, 1995, pursuant to Section 5(2) of the former Trade Mark Law, provided that the division may be declared only after the expiration of the time limit for lodging opposition and that the declaration shall only be admissible if an opposition pending on the filing date of the request would be directed after division only against one of the parts of the original application. The part of the original application not affected by opposition shall be registered pursuant to Section 41. Opposition under Section 42 shall not lie from such registration.
    第40条の規定は，旧商標法第5条[2]の規定に基づき1995年1月1日より前に公告された出願の分割に適用する。ただし，その分割は異議申立期間の満了後にのみ宣言することができること，及びその宣言は請求の提出日に係属している異議申立が分割後に原出願の一部に対してのみ向けられることになるときにのみ許容されることを条件とする。異議申立によって影響を受けない元の出願の部分は，第41条の規定に基づき登録される。当該登録には，第42条の規定に基づく異議申立はできないものとする。 - 特許庁
  • (iv) Accepting the consignment of a transaction set forth in Article 2, paragraph (6), item (i) with regard to a Transaction on a Commodity Market from a customer and carrying out a transaction set forth in the same item at an amount of a consideration which is more advantageous than the amount of a consideration for the transaction pertaining to said consignment (which means an amount of a consideration lower than that pertaining to said consignment in the case of buying and an amount of a consideration higher than that pertaining to said consignment in the case of selling) in order to close a transaction identical to the transaction pertaining to said consignment on the Commodity Market pertaining to said consignment based on the Futures Commission Merchant's own account prior to filing an application for the transaction pertaining to said consignment
    四　商品市場における取引につき、顧客から第二条第八項第一号に掲げる取引の委託を受け、その委託に係る取引の申込みの前に自己の計算においてその委託に係る商品市場における当該委託に係る取引と同一の取引を成立させることを目的として、当該委託に係る取引における対価の額より有利な対価の額（買付けについては当該委託に係る対価の額より低い対価の額を、売付けについては当該委託に係る対価の額より高い対価の額をいう。）で同号に掲げる取引をすること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 42 (1) The earlier application on which a priority claim is based under Article 41(1) shall be deemed to have been withdrawn when one year and three months has lapsed from the filing date of the earlier application; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where the earlier application has been waived, withdrawn or dismissed, where the examiner's decision or trial decision on the earlier application has become final and binding, where the registration establishing a utility model right under Article 14(2) of the Utility Model Act with respect to the earlier application has been effected or where all priority claims based on the earlier application have been withdrawn.
    第四十二条　前条第一項の規定による優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願は、その出願の日から一年三月を経過した時に取り下げたものとみなす。ただし、当該先の出願が放棄され、取り下げられ、若しくは却下されている場合、当該先の出願について査定若しくは審決が確定している場合、当該先の出願について実用新案法第十四条第二項に規定する設定の登録がされている場合又は当該先の出願に基づくすべての優先権の主張が取り下げられている場合には、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 105-6 (1) Where a ruling under Article 92(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure was rendered concerning the record of litigation in which a protective order was issued (excluding litigation in which all protective orders have been rescinded), where a party to whom the protective order was not issued in the litigation requests inspection etc. of a part of the record in which the confidential information is contained, etc under the said Article., immediately after the filing of the request, the court clerk shall notify the party who filed the motion (restricting access to the record) under the said Article (excluding the person who filed the request, the same in paragraph (3)) of the fact that the said request has been filed.
    第百五条の六　秘密保持命令が発せられた訴訟（すべての秘密保持命令が取り消された訴訟を除く。）に係る訴訟記録につき、民事訴訟法第九十二条第一項の決定があつた場合において、当事者から同項に規定する秘密記載部分の閲覧等の請求があり、かつ、その請求の手続を行つた者が当該訴訟において秘密保持命令を受けていない者であるときは、裁判所書記官は、同項の申立てをした当事者（その請求をした者を除く。第三項において同じ。）に対し、その請求後直ちに、その請求があつた旨を通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (5) For the purpose of laying open of an international application that is deemed to be a patent application under the preceding paragraph, the term "the date of the filing of a patent application" in Article 64(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the priority date under Article 184-4(1)", the term "foreign language written application" and "foreign language documents and the Abstract in foreign language" in Article 64(2)(vi) shall be deemed to be replaced with "international application in foreign language " and "description, scope of claim, drawing and abstract of an international application filed on the day to be accorded as the International application Date under Article 184-20(4)".
    ５　前項の規定により特許出願とみなされた国際出願についての出願公開については、第六十四条第一項中「特許出願の日」とあるのは「第百八十四条の四第一項の優先日」と、同条第二項第六号中「外国語書面出願」とあるのは「外国語でされた国際出願」と、「外国語書面及び外国語要約書面」とあるのは「第百八十四条の二十第四項に規定する国際出願日となつたものと認められる日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲、図面及び要約」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (4) Where an application is converted under paragraph (1) or (2), for the purpose of application of Article 43(2) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 11(1) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 43-2(3) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 11(1)), "within one year and four months from the earliest of the following dates" in Article 43(2) shall read "within one year and four months from the earliest of the following dates or three months from the date of filing of the application of a utility model registration arising from the conversion of an application under Article 10(1) or (2) of the Utility Model Act, whichever is later."
    ４　第一項又は第二項の規定による出願の変更をする場合における次条第一項において準用する特許法第四十三条第二項（次条第一項において準用する同法第四十三条の二第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、同法第四十三条第二項中「最先の日から一年四月以内」とあるのは、「最先の日から一年四月又は実用新案法第十条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による出願の変更に係る実用新案登録出願の日から三月のいずれか遅い日まで」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) Where a new application for trademark registration is filed as provided in paragraph (1), statements or documents submitted in connection with the original application for trademark registration which are required to be submitted in connection with the new application for trademark registration pursuant to Article 9(2) of this Act or Article 43(1) and 43(2) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 13(1) of this Act (including its mutatis mutandis application pursuant to Article 43-2(3) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 13(1) of this Act) shall be deemed to have been submitted to the Commissioner of the Patent Office at the time of filing the new application for trademark registration.
    ３　第一項に規定する新たな商標登録出願をする場合には、もとの商標登録出願について提出された書面又は書類であつて、新たな商標登録出願について第九条第二項又は第十三条第一項において準用する特許法第四十三条第一項及び第二項（第十三条第一項において準用する同法第四十三条の二第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により提出しなければならないものは、当該新たな商標登録出願と同時に特許庁長官に提出されたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 32-2 (1) Any person who has been using in Japan a trademark identical with, or similar to, a regionally based collective trademark for which an application for registration is filed by another person in connection with the designated goods or designated services for which the application for trademark registration is filed, or in connection with goods or services similar thereto, without any intention to be engaged in unfair competition, prior to the filing of such other person's application for trademark registration of the said regionally based collective trademark, shall have the right to use the trademark in connection with such goods or services as far as the said person continuously uses the trademark in connection with such goods or services. The same shall apply to those by whom such business is succeeded.
    第三十二条の二　他人の地域団体商標の商標登録出願前から日本国内において不正競争の目的でなくその商標登録出願に係る指定商品若しくは指定役務又はこれらに類似する商品若しくは役務についてその商標又はこれに類似する商標の使用をしていた者は、継続してその商品又は役務についてその商標の使用をする場合は、その商品又は役務についてその商標の使用をする権利を有する。当該業務を承継した者についても、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 33-2 (1) Where a patent right of an application that has been filed prior to or on the same date as the filing date of an application for trademark registration conflicts with the trademark right of the application for trademark registration, upon expiration of the duration of the said patent right, the original patent right holder shall have the right to use the registered trademark or a trademark similar thereto in connection with the designated goods or designated services specified in the application, or goods or services similar thereto, within the limits of the original patent right; provided, however, that such trademark is not used for the purpose of unfair competition.
    第三十三条の二　商標登録出願の日前又はこれと同日の特許出願に係る特許権がその商標登録出願に係る商標権と抵触する場合において、その特許権の存続期間が満了したときは、その原特許権者は、原特許権の範囲内において、その商標登録出願に係る指定商品若しくは指定役務又はこれらに類似する商品若しくは役務についてその登録商標又はこれに類似する商標の使用をする権利を有する。ただし、その使用が不正競争の目的でされない場合に限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (4) In calculating the interest on refund with respect to a refund pursuant to the provision of paragraph (2), the period set forth in Article 58(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes (Interest on Refund), which shall be the basis of such calculation, shall be the period from the day following the day on which the return form has been filed pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) (in the case of a refund pertaining to the amount of income tax prescribed in the preceding paragraph which has been paid after the said date of filing of the return form, the date of payment of the said amount of income tax) until the day on which payment of the relevant refund is determined or the day on which the relevant refund is appropriated (in the case where appropriation has become possible before the said date of appropriation, that day on which it becomes possible).
    ４　第二項の規定による還付金について還付加算金を計算する場合には、その計算の基礎となる国税通則法第五十八条第一項　（還付加算金）の期間は、第一項の規定による申告書の提出があつた日（同日後に納付された前項に規定する所得税の額に係る還付金については、その納付の日）の翌日からその還付のための支払決定をする日又はその還付金につき充当をする日（同日前に充当をするのに適することとなつた日がある場合には、その適することとなつた日）までの期間とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Any interested person may request the Ministry of Commerce to remove a mark from the Register, in respect of any of the goods or services in respect of which it is registered, on the ground that up to one month prior to filing the request the mark had, after its registration, not been used by the registered owner or a licensee during a continuous period of five years, provided that a mark shall not be removed if it is shown that special circumstances prevented the use of the mark and that there was no intention not to use or to abandon the same in respect of those goods or services.
    如何なる利害関係人も，請求を提出する1月前までに，当該標章はその登録後5年の連続期間中に登録所有者又は使用権者が使用していなかったことを理由として，その登録に係る商品又はサービスの何れかについて，当該標章を標章登録簿から削除するよう商務省に請求することができる。ただし，特殊事情が当該標章の使用を妨げたこと及びそれら商品又はサービスに係り当該標章を使用しない意思又は放棄する意思が一切存在しなかったことが証明されたときは，当該標章は削除されないことを条件とする。 - 特許庁
  • The subject-matter defined by a claim in an application for a patent in Canada must be subject-matter that would not have been obvious on the claim date to a person skilled in the art or science to which it pertains, having regard to information disclosed more than one year before the filing date by the applicant, or by a person who obtained knowledge, directly or indirectly, from the applicant in such a manner that the information became available to the public in Canada or elsewhere; and (b) information disclosed before the claim date by a person not mentioned in paragraph (a) in such a manner that the information became available to the public in Canada or elsewhere.
    カナダ特許出願のクレームで特定された主題は，次の情報から見て，それが関連する技術又は科学分野の熟練者にとってクレーム日において自明でなかったものでなければならない: (a) 出願日より1年を超える前に，出願人により又は出願人から直接的か間接的かを問わず知った者により，カナダ又は他の場所において，公衆の利用に供される方法で開示された情報，及び (b) クレーム日より前に，(a)に述べる者以外の者により，カナダ又は他の場所において，公衆の利用に供される方法で開示された情報 - 特許庁
  • For the purposes of subsection 28(1) of the Act, the filing date of an application, other than a PCT national phase application, is the date on which the Commissioner receives the following documents, information and fees: (a) an indication in English or French that the granting of a Canadian patent is sought; (b) the name of the applicant; (c) the address of the applicant or of a patent agent of the applicant; (d) a document, in English or French, that on its face appears to describe an invention; and (e) either (i) a small entity declaration in accordance with section 3.01 and the small entity fee set out in item 1 of Schedule II, or (ii) the standard fee set out in that item.
    法律第28条(1)の適用上，PCT国内段階出願以外の出願の出願日は，次の書類，情報及び手数料を長官が受領する日とする: (a) カナダ特許付与を求める旨の英語又はフランス語による表示 (b) 出願人の名称 (c) 出願人又は出願人の特許代理人の宛先 (d) 外見上発明を説明していると認められる英語又はフランス語による書類，及び (e) 次の何れかのもの (i) 第3.01条に従う小規模事業体宣言書及び附則II項目1に掲げる小規模事業体手数料，又は (ii) 同項目に掲げる標準手数料 - 特許庁
  • Where a statement by the Minister, setting out in respect of an indication the information mentioned in subsection (3), is published in the Canada Gazette and (a) a statement of objection has not been filed and served on the responsible authority in accordance with subsection 11.13(1) and the time for the filing of the statement of objection has expired, or (b) a statement of objection has been so filed and served, but it has been withdrawn or deemed under subsection 11.13(6) to have been withdrawn or it has been rejected pursuant to subsection 11.13(7) or, if an appeal is taken, it is rejected pursuant to the final judgment given in the appeal, the Registrar shall enter the indication on the list of geographical indications kept pursuant to subsection (1).
    表示に関し(3)に規定する情報を記載した大臣の陳述がカナダ官報に公告され，かつ， (a) 異論申立書が第11.13条(1)に従って提出及び責任機関に送達されずに異論申立書提出期間が満了している場合，又は (b) 異論申立書が提出及び送達されたが，これが取り下げられ若しくは第11.13条(6)に基づいて取り下げられたものとみなされたか，又は第11.13条(7)に従って拒絶されたか若しくは上訴による最終判決に従って拒絶された場合は， 登録官は(1)に従って備えられた地理的表示一覧に当該表示を記入しなければならない。 - 特許庁
  • Where the subject matter is described as a generic concept in a prior art or disclosed invention and the prior art does not specifically disclose the specific concepts which the patented invention comprises, even though a person skilled in the art can easily derive the patented invention from the disclosed invention, since it is hard to recognize that a patented invention consisting only of specific concepts including the above-mentioned generic concept contains unexpected effects of the invention, the invention shall be considered to involve novelty since the patented invention cannot be deemed to be the same with the disclosed invention before filing the application (Case No. 2001Hu2375 (Supreme Court, 26 Dec. 2002)).
    主題が先行技術又は開示された発明の上位概念として記載されていて、先行技術が特許発明に構成される下位概念を開示していない場合、当業者が開示された発明から特許発明を容易に導き出せるとしても、上記の上位概念を有する下位概念のみから構成される特許発明が発明の予期しない効果を含むと認めるのは困難なため、出願前に開示された発明と特許発明が同一であるとすることがでず、発明は新規性を有すると判断される（大法院、2002 12.26言渡2001フ2375判決）。 - 特許庁
  • A person who has duly filed in or for the State, or in or for any other state party to the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property or to the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation, an application for a patent or for the registration of a utility model or for a utility certificate or for an inventor’s certificate, or his successors in title, shall enjoy, for the purpose of filing a subsequent patent application under this Act in respect of the same invention, a right of priority during such period as may be prescribed, subject to compliance with any prescribed conditions and the payment of any prescribed fee.
    アイルランドにおいて若しくはアイルランドについて，又は工業所有権の保護に関するパリ条約若しくは世界貿易機関を設立する協定の他の当事国において又は当該他の当事国について，特許出願若しくは実用新案登録出願又は実用証出願若しくは発明者証出願を適法に行った者又はその権原承継人は，同一発明に関して本法に基づく後の特許出願を提出する目的で，所定の期間中，所定の条件の遵守及び所定の手数料の納付を条件として，優先権を享受する。 - 特許庁
  • (iv) Accepting the consignment of a transaction set forth in Article 2, paragraph 6, item 1 with regard to a Transaction on a Commodity Market from a customer and carrying out a transaction set forth in the same item at an amount of a consideration which is more advantageous than the amount of a consideration for the transaction pertaining to said consignment (which means an amount of a consideration lower than that pertaining to said consignment in the case of buying and an amount of a consideration higher than that pertaining to said consignment in the case of selling) in order to close a transaction identical to the transaction pertaining to said consignment on the Commodity Market pertaining to said consignment based on the Futures Commission Merchant’s own account prior to filing an application for the transaction pertaining to said consignment
    四商品市場における取引につき、顧客から第二条第八項第一号に掲げる取引の委託を受け、その委託に係る取引の申込みの前に自己の計算においてその委託に係る商品市 場における当該委託に係る取引と同一の取引を成立させることを目的として、当該委託に係る取引における対価の額より有利な対価の額（買付けについては当該委託に係る対価の額より低い対価の額を、売付けについては当該委託に係る対価の額より高い対価の額をいう。）で同号に掲げる取引をすること。 - 経済産業省
  • If in any particular case the Registrar is satisfied that the failure to give, make or file any notice, application or other document within any period of time specified in the Act or these Rules for such giving, making or filing was wholly or mainly attributable to a failure or undue delay in the postal services in Brunei Darussalam, the Registrar may, if he thinks fit, extend the period so that it ends on the day of the receipt by the addressee of the notice, application or other document (or, if the day of such receipt is an excluded day, on the first following day which is not an excluded day), upon such notice to other parties and upon such terms as he may direct.
    法律又は本規則において付与，作成又は提出を行うよう定められている期間内に，通知，出願又はその他の書類の付与，作成又は提出が，完全に又は主に，ブルネイ・ダムラサール国における郵便業務の不履行又は過度の遅延に起因していると登録官が認める特段の場合には，登録官は，適切であると考える場合において，他方の当事者へその通知を行うことにより，及び登録官が指示した条件のもとに，通知，出願又はその他の書類にある宛先で受領する日(又は，当該受領が非就業日の場合は翌日)が終了となるよう期間を延長できる。 - 特許庁
  • 6. The certificate application must be accompanied with the following documents; (a) a copy of the first authorization by Luxembourg to market the product as medicine, or a copy of the notice of its publication in the Memorial or in the official journal of the Community; (b) the abstract of the characteristics of the product, if it does not already appear in the copy of the authorization; (c) a copy of the first national authorization to market the product granted in the territory of the Community, or a copy of the notice of its publication in the official journal of the Community or ofthe member state concerned, if this authorization does not meet with the first authorization by Luxembourg; (d) the proof of payment of the filing fee and the publication fee.
    (6) 証明書の申請には，次の書類を添付しなければならない。 (a) 医薬としての生産物市販についてのルクセンブルクによる最初の承認書の写，又は官報若しくは欧州共同体公報におけるその公告通知の写 (b) 承認書の写にまだ記載されていない場合は，生産物の特性の要約書 (c) 欧州共同体の領域内で付与された生産物市販についての最初の国内承認書がルクセンブルクによる最初の承認書と符号しない場合は，この承認書の写，又は欧州共同体若しくは関係加盟国の公報におけるその公告通知の写 (d) 申請手数料及び公告手数料の納付証 - 特許庁
  • (1) At any time after the expiration of three years from the grant of a patent, or four years from the filing date of the patent application, whichever is the later, any person may apply to the Registrar for a compulsory licence under any of the following circumstances: (a) where there is no production of the patented product or application of the patented process in Malaysia without any legitimate reason; (b) where there is no product produced in Malaysia under the patent for sale in any domestic market, or there are some but they are sold at unreasonably high prices or do not meet public demand without any legitimate reason.
    (1)特許の付与から3年又は特許出願の出願日から4年の期間のうち，何れか遅い方が終了した後においては，何人も登録官に対し，次に掲げる事由の何れかに基づいて，強制ライセンスを取得するための申請をすることができる。(a)正当な理由なしに，マレーシアにおいて，その特許製品の生産又はその特許方法の利用が行われていないこと(b)正当な理由なしに，マレーシアにおいて，国内市場における販売のためにその特許に基づく製品が生産されていないか，又は若干の製品はあるが，それらが不当に高価で販売されているか若しくは公衆の需要を満たしていないこと - 特許庁
  • (1) Where. (a) a foreign receiving office has. (i) refused to accord a filing date to an international application; (ii) declared that the international application is considered withdrawn; or (iii) declared that the designation of Malaysia is considered withdrawn; or (b) the International Bureau has declared that an international application is considered withdrawn because it has not received a record copy of the international application within the time specified under the Treaty; and (c) copies of any document in the international application have been sent to the Patent Registration Office, the applicant may request the Patent Registration Office to review the justification of the refusal or declaration under the Treaty.”; and
    (1)以下の要件を満たす場合には，出願人は，特許登録局に対して，条約に基づき，拒絶又は宣言の正当性に対して審査するよう請求することができるものとする。(a)外国の受理官庁が(i)国際出願に対して出願日を付与することを拒絶し，(ii)国際出願が取下げられたとみなされる旨を宣言し,若しくは，(iii)マレーシアの指定が取下げられたとみなされる旨を宣言した場合，又は，(b)国際事務局が，条約に定める期間内に国際出願願書の写しを受理しなかったため，国際出願が取下げられたとみなされる旨を宣言され，かつ，(c)国際出願に係る写しが既に特許登録局に提出された場合 - 特許庁
  • (5) The publication of the reference to the grant of the patent shall include - (a) the number of the patent; and (b) the name and address of the owner of the patent; and (c) the name and address of the inventor, except where he has asked not to be named in the patent; and (d) the name and address of the agent if any; and (e) the filing date; and (f) if priority has been claimed and the claim has been accepted, a statement of the priority, the priority date and the name of the country or countries in which or for which the earlier application was filed; and (g) the effective date of grant of the patent; and (h) the title of the invention; and (i) the abstract; and (j) the most illustrative of the drawings, if any; and (k) the symbol of the International patent Classification.
    (5) 特許付与の件の公告には，次のものを含める。 (a) 特許番号 (b) 特許所有者の名称及び宛先 (c) 発明者の名称及び宛先。ただし，発明者が特許において記名しないように求めた場合を除く。 (d) 代理人が存在する場合は，その名称及び宛先 (e) 出願日 (f) 優先権が主張されかつ主張が認められた場合は，優先権に係る陳述，優先日及び先の出願がなされた国又は先の出願が指定してなされた国の名称 (g) 特許付与の発効日 (h) 発明の名称 (i) 要約 (j) 図面が存在する場合は，そのうちで最も説明に役立つもの，及び (k) 国際特許分類記号 - 特許庁
  • The inventions which are not elected after a requirement for division may be the subject of separate applications which will be examined in the same manner as original applications. However, if such an application is filed before the original application is patented or withdrawn, and if it is identical and the papers constituting an exact copy of the original papers which were signed and executed by the applicant, signing and execution of the applicant may be omitted; such application may consist of the filing fee, a copy of the drawings complying with rules relating to drawings and filed, together with a proposed amendment canceling the irrelevant claims or other matters.
    分割の要求後に選択されなかった発明は，分離出願の主題とすることができ，原出願と同じ方法で審査される。ただし，原出願が特許を付与される前又は放棄される前に当該出願がなされた場合，かつ，当該出願書類が，出願人が署名し作成した原文書の正確な謄本である文書と同一である場合は，出願人による署名及び作成を省略することができる。当該出願は，出願手数料，及び図面に関する規則を遵守する提出図面の写しで構成することができ，同時に，関連しないクレーム又はその他の事項を除去した補正案も添付する。 - 特許庁
  • (6-1) If priority is claimed, priority for a patent application filed with the Patent Office after expiry of the twelve-month term specified in subsection (2) or (5) of this section may be established on the basis of the filing date of a first patent application or registration application of a utility model pursuant to subsection (2) or (5) of this section if: 1) the reasons for the failure to comply with the abovementioned term are appended to the priority claim; 2) the reasons stated pursuant to clause 1) of this subsection prove that the failure to file the application within the term was unintentional; 3) the patent application was filed within two months from the date on which the abovementioned term expired.
    (6-1) 優先権が主張される場合は，(2)又は(5)に規定した12月の期間が満了した後に特許庁に対して行われた出願に関する優先権は，次に掲げる条件が遵守されることを条件として，(2)及び(5)に従い，最先の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願日を基にして確立することができる。 1) 優先権の主張に，前記の期限を遵守しなかったことについての理由書が添付されていること 2) 1)に従って記載する理由が，期限内に出願をしなかったことは故意によるものではないことを証明していること 3) 特許出願が，前記期限の満了日から2月以内に行われたこと (2003年1月29日。2003年4月1日施行－RT I 2003, 18, 106) - 特許庁
  • If the person making the first application, or his successor in title, has filed with the same authority a later application relating to the same design, the later application may be invoked as the basis of priority provided that, at the time of filing, the earlier application had been withdrawn, dismissed or rejected and the documents filed in the case had not become available to the public, and has not left outstanding any right based upon it and has not served as a basis for priority. Where priority is accepted on the basis of the later application, the earlier application may no longer be invoked as grounds for priority.
    最初の出願を行った出願人又はその権原承継人が同一特許当局に対して同一の意匠に関する後の出願を行った場合は，当該後の出願を優先権の基礎として援用することができる。ただし，その出願時において，先の出願が既に取下，却下若しくは拒絶されており，かつ，その事件において提出された書類が公衆の利用に供されていなかったこと，先の出願に基づく如何なる権利も残っておらず，かつ，先の出願が優先権の基礎として機能していないことを条件とする。当該後の出願を基礎として優先権が容認された場合は，先の出願は，もはや優先権の根拠として援用することができない。 - 特許庁
  • (b) If the applicant in such an application wishes to rely on particular facts not apparent from the official record, an affidavit must be filed at the office at least ten court days before the hearing. In the event that the applicant does not file an affidavit, it shall be presumed that he intends to rely on those facts which are properly before the registrar. At any time within the period allowed for the filing of such an affidavit by the applicant, he may give written notification to the other party and to the registrar that he intends to rely on the facts which are properly before the registrar.
    (b) 当該申請の申請人が公式記録から明らかでない特定の事実に依拠することを希望する場合は，聴聞の少なくとも10開廷日前に宣誓供述書を庁に提出しなければならない。申請人が宣誓供述書を提出しなかった場合は，申請人は適正に登録官の下にある事実に依拠することを意図していると推定する。申請人は，当該宣誓供述書の申請人による提出のために認められる期間内はいつでも，他方当事者及び登録官に対し，当該人は適正に登録官の下にある事実に依拠することを意図する旨を書面で通知することができる。 - 特許庁
  • Article 375 (1) Where the court makes a judgment to uphold a claim, when it finds it particularly necessary while taking into consideration the defendant's financial resources and any other circumstances concerned, it may stipulate in the judgment a provision concerning the period for payment of money pertaining to the claim that it upholds or provision authorizing installment payment with regard to such payment of money, both of which shall be within three years from the date of rendition of the judgment, or simultaneously stipulate a provision to the effect that if the defendant has made a payment pursuant to the provision concerning the period or has made a payment without losing, pursuant to the provision of the following paragraph, the benefit of time under the provision authorizing installment payment, he/she shall be exempted from the obligation to pay any delay damages accrued after the filing of the action.
    第三百七十五条　裁判所は、請求を認容する判決をする場合において、被告の資力その他の事情を考慮して特に必要があると認めるときは、判決の言渡しの日から三年を超えない範囲内において、認容する請求に係る金銭の支払について、その時期の定め若しくは分割払の定めをし、又はこれと併せて、その時期の定めに従い支払をしたとき、若しくはその分割払の定めによる期限の利益を次項の規定による定めにより失うことなく支払をしたときは訴え提起後の遅延損害金の支払義務を免除する旨の定めをすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 398 (1) If a lawful objection to demand is made against a demand for payment issued through the demand procedure based on a petition for demand for payment that is filed by means of an electronic data processing system pursuant to the provision of the main clause of Article 132-10(1), with regard to the claim pertaining to the objection to demand, it shall be deemed that an action is filed, at the time of filing of the petition for demand for payment, with the summary court prescribed in Article 383 to which the court clerk who has issued the demand for payment belongs or a summary court specified separately by the Rules of the Supreme Court as set forth in the preceding Article or the district court that has jurisdiction over the location of either summary court, depending on the value of the subject matter of the claim.
    第三百九十八条　第百三十二条の十第一項本文の規定により電子情報処理組織を用いてされた支払督促の申立てに係る督促手続における支払督促に対し適法な督促異議の申立てがあったときは、督促異議に係る請求については、その目的の価額に従い、当該支払督促の申立ての時に、第三百八十三条に規定する簡易裁判所で支払督促を発した裁判所書記官の所属するもの若しくは前条の別に最高裁判所規則で定める簡易裁判所又はその所在地を管轄する地方裁判所に訴えの提起があったものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 147 The provisions of Article 137 to the preceding Article (Request for Examination of Documentary Evidence, etc.; Attaching of Translation, etc.; Period for Submission of Copy of Documentary Evidence; Method of Filing Petition for Order to Submit Document, etc.; Retention of Presented Document; Record of Examination of Evidence by Authorized Judge, etc.; Method of Submission, etc. of Document; Handling in Cases where Request for Examination of Documentary Evidence was Made for Transcription of Audio Tape, etc.; Clear Indication of Reason in Cases of Denying Authenticity of Creation of Document; and Record, etc. pertaining to Document, etc. to be Used for Comparison of Handwriting, etc.) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the objects prescribed in Article 231 (Application Mutatis Mutandis to Objects Equivalent to Documents) of the Code, except as otherwise provided.
    第百四十七条　第百三十七条から前条まで（書証の申出等、訳文の添付等、書証の写しの提出期間、文書提出命令の申立ての方式等、提示文書の保管、受命裁判官等の証拠調べの調書、文書の提出等の方法、録音テープ等の反訳文書の書証の申出があった場合の取扱い、文書の成立を否認する場合における理由の明示及び筆跡等の対照の用に供すべき文書等に係る調書等）の規定は、特別の定めがある場合を除き、法第二百三十一条（文書に準ずる物件への準用）に規定する物件について準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (ii) a person who has filed an equivalent application(s) to the application for variety registration in a state provided in item 3 of Article 10 which allows Japanese nationals to claim a right of priority under the same conditions as Japan does (excluding State Parties and Member States; hereinafter referred to as "Designated State")(hereinafter referred to as "application in a Designated State") or his/her successor in title (limited to a Japanese national or a person belonging to a Designated State): where the person or his/her successor in title files an application for variety registration in relation to the variety pertaining to the said application in a Designated State, within one year from the day following the date of the filing of the first application in a Designated State (hereinafter referred to as "date of application in a Designated State").
    二　前条第三号に規定する国であって日本国民に対し日本国と同一の条件により優先権の主張を認めるもの（締約国及び同盟国を除く。以下「特定国」という。）に対する品種登録出願に相当する出願（以下「特定国出願」という。）をした者又はその承継人（日本国民又は当該特定国に属する者に限る。）　特定国出願のうち最先の出願（当該特定国に属する者にあっては、当該特定国出願）をした日（以下「特定国出願日」という。）の翌日から一年以内に当該特定国出願に係る品種につき品種登録出願をする場合 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 42 (1) Where a ruling under Article 92 (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Act No. 109 of 1996) was rendered pertaining to the record of litigation in which a protective order was issued (excluding litigation in which all protective orders have been rescinded), where a party to whom the protective order was not issued in the litigation requests inspection etc. of a part of the record in which the confidential information is contained, etc. under the said Article, immediately after the filing of the request, the court clerk shall notify the party who filed the motion under the said Article (excluding the person who filed the request, the same in paragraph (3)) of the fact that the said request has been filed.
    第四十二条　秘密保持命令が発せられた訴訟（すべての秘密保持命令が取り消された訴訟を除く。）に係る訴訟記録につき、民事訴訟法（平成八年法律第百九号）第九十二条第一項の決定があった場合において、当事者から同項に規定する秘密記載部分の閲覧等の請求があり、かつ、その請求の手続を行った者が当該訴訟において秘密保持命令を受けていない者であるときは、裁判所書記官は、同項の申立てをした当事者（その請求をした者を除く。第三項において同じ。）に対し、その請求後直ちに、その請求があった旨を通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 64 (1) If the details of a resolution made at a general meeting of members are in violation of the Asset Securitization Plan, a member, director, company auditor, liquidator, Specified Bondholder, holder of a Specified Promissory Note, or creditor pertaining to a Specified Promissory Note may request the rescission of said resolution by filing an action within three months from the date that the resolution was made at the general meeting of members. The same shall apply to a person who is to become a director, company auditor, or liquidator (including a person who holds the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor, or liquidator under Article 76(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 168(5))) as a result of the rescission of said resolution.
    第六十四条　社員総会の決議の内容が資産流動化計画に違反するときは、社員、取締役、監査役、清算人、特定社債権者、特定約束手形の所持人又は特定目的借入れに係る債権者は、社員総会の決議の日から三箇月以内に、訴えをもって当該決議の取消しを請求することができる。当該決議の取消しにより取締役、監査役又は清算人（第七十六条第一項（第百六十八条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）となる者も、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 217 (1) If, after the period for filing proofs of claims has expired but before the ordinary period for investigation has started, a petition is filed by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. the court shall make an order of consensual rehabilitation (meaning an order to the effect that proceedings for investigation and determination of rehabilitation claims and a procedure for adopting a resolution on a proposed rehabilitation plan submitted by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. shall not be performed; the same shall apply hereinafter). In this case, the rehabilitation debtor, etc. may file a petition only where all holders of filed rehabilitation claims have, in writing, consented to a proposed rehabilitation plan submitted by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. and also consented to not performing the proceedings for investigation and determination of rehabilitation claims provided for in Chapter IV, Section 3.
    第二百十七条　裁判所は、債権届出期間の経過後一般調査期間の開始前において、再生債務者等の申立てがあったときは、同意再生の決定（再生債権の調査及び確定の手続並びに再生債務者等が提出した再生計画案の決議を経ない旨の決定をいう。以下同じ。）をする。この場合において、再生債務者等の申立ては、すべての届出再生債権者が、書面により、再生債務者等が提出した再生計画案について同意し、かつ、第四章第三節に定める再生債権の調査及び確定の手続を経ないことについて同意している場合に限り、することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 12 to cases of filing a repeated petition set forth in the preceding paragraph, the term "the following matters" in the part other than those enumerated in each item of Article 12, paragraph 1 shall be deemed to be replaced with "matters listed in item 1, item 2, and item 5 and circumstances set forth in the main clause of Article 18, paragraph 1," the term "the matters listed in the preceding items" in item 5 of the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "matters listed in item 1 and item 2 and circumstances set forth in the main clause of Article 18, paragraph 1," and the term "the matters listed in items 1 to 4 of the same paragraph" in paragraph 2 of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "matters listed in item 1 and item 2 of the same paragraph and circumstances set forth in the main clause of Article 18, paragraph 1."
    ２　前項の申立てをする場合における第十二条の規定の適用については、同条第一項各号列記以外の部分中「次に掲げる事項」とあるのは「第一号、第二号及び第五号に掲げる事項並びに第十八条第一項本文の事情」と、同項第五号中「前各号に掲げる事項」とあるのは「第一号及び第二号に掲げる事項並びに第十八条第一項本文の事情」と、同条第二項中「同項第一号から第四号までに掲げる事項」とあるのは「同項第一号及び第二号に掲げる事項並びに第十八条第一項本文の事情」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • In cases where the party who is likely to have a material impact on the business management of a financial instruments business operator by filing a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the “parent company, etc.” in V-2-3) has actually filed a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, etc. against the financial instruments business operator, supervisors shall, by issuing an order for production of a report under Article 56-2(1) of the FIEA, quickly identify the financial instruments business operator’s financial conditions in combination with the most recent conditions of the parent company, etc., the business relationships with the parent company, etc., the status of contracts with customers (if the business operator has received deposits from customers, the specific content thereof), and the business operator’s policy for continuing the business.
    破産等手続開始の申立てにより金融商品取引業者の経営に重大な影響を与え得る者（以下Ⅴ－２－３において「親会社等」という。）が破産等手続開始の申立てを行った場合は、当該金融商品取引業者に対する金商法第 56条の２第１項に基づく報告徴求命令を通じて、当該親会社等の直近の状況を踏まえた財務の状況、親会社等との間の取引関係、顧客との契約の状況（顧客からの預り金がある場合にはその具体的な内容）及び業務の継続に関する方針等を速やかに把握するものとする。 - 金融庁
  • In cases where the party who is likely to have a material impact on the business management of a financial instruments business operator by filing a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the “parent company, etc.” in VII-2-3) has actually filed a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, etc. against the financial instruments business operator, supervisors shall, by issuing an order for production of a report under Article 56-2(1) of the FIEA, quickly identify the financial instruments business operator’s financial conditions in combination with the most recent conditions of the parent company, etc., the business relationships with the parent company, etc., the status of contracts with customers (if the business operator has received deposits from customers, the specific content thereof) and the business operator’s policy for continuing the business.
    破産等手続開始の申立てにより金融商品取引業者の経営に重大な影響を与え得る者（以下Ⅶ－２－３において「親会社等」という。）が破産等手続開始の申立てを行った場合は、当該金融商品取引業者に対する金商法第 56条の２第１項に基づく報告徴求命令を通じて、当該親会社等の直近の状況を踏まえた財務の状況、親会社等との間の取引関係、顧客との契約の状況（顧客からの預り金がある場合にはその具体的な内容）及び業務の継続に関する方針等を速やかに把握するものとする。 - 金融庁
  • Pending applications shall retain their priority date or original date of filing with the Bureau of Patents Trademarks and Technology Transfer. Applicants which elected to prosecute their applications under Republic Act No. 166 and its Implementing Rules and Regulations under which they were required to submit proof of use of the Mark, particularly with reference to applications for registrations based on use in the Philippines, shall file the corresponding declaration of actual use with evidence to that effect as prescribed by these Regulations, without need of any notice from the Office, within three years from the effectivity of these Regulations, without possibility of extension. Otherwise, the application shall be refused or the mark shall be removed from the register by the Director motu prorio. [As amended by Office Order No. 17 (1998)]
    係属出願は，その優先日又は特許・商標・技術移転局への原出願日を維持する。共和国法律第166号及びその施行規則は，標章使用の証拠を要件としており，フィリピンにおける使用に基づく登録出願に特に言及しているが，当該法律及び規則に基づいて，自己の出願を遂行することを選択した出願人は，庁からの通知がなくても，本規則に対応する実際の使用の宣言及びその証拠を，本規則の施行から延長の認められない3年以内に，提出しなければならない。そうしなかった場合は，出願は，拒絶されるか又は標章が局長の職権により登録簿から抹消される。 - 特許庁
  • The applicant may divide his application into two or more divisional applications, but none of them may entail any broadening of the invention or of the disclosure contained in the application as filed. Each divisional application shall retain the benefit of the filing date of the original application. Division of the application by the applicant shall take place before publication, and at the request of the competent office at any time during processing. Where division is requested or a proposal to divide the application accepted, those documents shall be filed and those procedures applied that correspond to the new form of application.
    分割後の出願の何れにも発明自体の拡張も出願書類に含まれる開示事項の拡張も伴わないことを条件に，出願人は自己の特許出願を複数の特許出願に分割することができる。分割された出願の各々は，当初出願の出願日を維持する。出願人による特許出願の分割は原則として公告前に行わなければならないが，所轄当局の要求により分割する場合は出願処理の手続中何時でも行うことができる。分割請求がなされ又は所轄当局の分割提案が受け入れられた場合は，出願人は対応する新たな産業財産出願書類を提出し新規の手続が開始される。 - 特許庁
  • (3) Where a complete specification is filed in pursuance of an application for a patent made by a person being the true and first inventor or deriving title from him, an invention claimed in that specification shall not be deemed to have been anticipated by reason only of any other application for a patent in respect of the same invention, made in contravention of the rights of that person, or by reason only that after the date of filing of that other application the invention was used or published, without the consent of that person, by the applicant in respect of that other application, or by any other person in consequence of any disclosure of the invention by that applicant.
    (3) 真実かつ最先の発明者である者又はその権原取得者が特許出願手続において完全明細書を提出するときは，当該明細書においてクレームされた発明は，同一発明に係り前記の者の権利に違反してされた他の特許出願があるという理由のみによって，又は当該他の出願の出願日後に前記の者の同意を得ないで当該他の出願に係る出願人若しくは当該他の出願に係る出願人がその発明を開示した結果として何れかの他人がその発明を実施若しくは公表したという理由のみによっては，先行されたものとみなさない。 - 特許庁
  • (b) If the applicant in such an application wishes to rely on particular facts not apparent from the official record, an affidavit must be filed at the Office at least 10 court days before the hearing. In the event that the applicant does not file an affidavit, it shall be presumed that he intends to rely on those facts which are properly before the Registrar. At any time within the period allowed for the filing of such an affidavit by the applicant, he may give written notification to the other party and to the Registrar that he intends to rely on the facts which are properly before the Registrar.
    (b) 当該申請の申請人が公式記録からは明らかでない特定の事実に依拠することを希望する場合は，聴聞の少なくとも10開廷日前に宣誓供述書を庁に提出しなければならない。申請人は宣誓供述書を提出しなかった場合は，申請人は適正に登録官の下にある事実に依拠することを意図していると推定されるものとする。申請人は，当該宣誓供述書の申請人による提出のために認められた期間内のいつでも，他方当事者及び登録官に対し，当該人は適正に登録官の下にある事実に依拠することを意図している旨の通知書を送付することができる。 - 特許庁
  • The following data of each invention shall be recorded in the Patent Register: number of the patent; the date of grant of the patent; the date of publication of grant of the patent in the Official Bulletin of the Industrial Property Office ? hereinafter referred to as "the Bulletin"; the title of the invention; the date of filing of the application for an invention and its reference number; the date of publication of the application for an invention; information on priority right under the international treaty, if this applies; the owner of the patent, his address or the address of his representative; classification of the invention according to the International Patent Classification; the surname, first name and address of the inventor; assignment of the patent; license; offer of license; compulsory license; the right of a prior user; annulment or partial annulment of the patent; payment of administrative fees for the patent; lapse of the patent; other decisive data.
    各発明の次の資料を特許登録簿に記録する。特許の番号,特許付与日,庁の公報(以下「公報」という。)において特許付与を公告した日,発明の名称,発明出願の日及びその参照番号,発明出願の公開日,該当する場合は，国際条約に基づく優先権に関する情報,特許権者及びその住所又は代理人の住所,国際特許分類に基づく発明の分類,発明者の姓名及び住所,特許の譲渡,ライセンス,ライセンスの申出,強制ライセンス,先使用者の権利,特許の取消又は部分的取消,特許の手数料の支払,特許の消滅,その他の確定的な資料。 - 特許庁
  • Where an invention and a device claimed in applications for a patent and a utility model registration are identical (excluding the case where an invention claimed in a patent application based on a utility model registration under Article 46-2(1) (including a patent application that is deemed to have been filed at the time of filing of the said patent application under Article 44(2) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 46(5)) and a device relating to the said utility model registration are identical) and the application for a patent and a utility model registration are filed on the same date, only one of the applicants, selected by consultations between the applicants, shall be entitled to obtain a patent or a utility model registration.
    特許出願に係る発明と実用新案登録出願に係る考案とが同一である場合(第四十六条の二第一項の規定による実用新案登録に基づく特許出願(第四十四条第二項(第四十六条第五項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により当該特許出願の時にしたものとみなされるものを含む。)に係る発明とその実用新案登録に係る考案とが同一である場合を除く。)において、その特許出願及び実用新案登録出願が同日にされたものであるときは、出願人の協議により定めた一の出願人のみが特許又は実用新案登録を受けることができる。 - 特許庁
  • If whether or not all of the inventions that were examined in terms of the requirements for patentability, such as novelty and inventive step, in the claims before the amendment and all of the inventions in the claims after the amendment have the same or corresponding special technical feature could be determined based on the prior art which have not been presented to the applicant before the amendment, in addition to description, etc., common general technical knowledge as of the filing and the prior art cited in a notice of reasons for refusal before the amendment, the applicant who has received the notice of reasons for refusal would not be able to sufficiently predict the scope of acceptable amendment which does not change any special technical features of the inventions when he/she considers an amendment to make.
    補正前の特許請求の範囲の新規性･進歩性等の特許要件についての審査が行われたすべての発明及び補正後の特許請求の範囲のすべての発明が同一の又は対応する特別な技術的特徴を有するかどうかを、明細書等の記載、出願時の技術常識及び補正前の拒絶理由通知で引用された先行技術に加えて、補正前に出願人に提示していなかった先行技術に基づいて判断できることとすると、拒絶理由通知を受けた出願人が補正を検討する際に、発明の特別な技術的特徴を変更する補正とならない範囲について十分に予測することができなくなる。 - 特許庁
  • If a person, in good faith, manufactures a product, utilizes an industrialprocess, manufactures an integrated circuit incorporating a layout designor a commodity including such a circuit, exploits a plant variety or makesserious arrangements, before the date of filing the patent application,or the priority application relating to that product or the process,design, plant variety, or the date of first commercial exploitation ofthe design anywhere in the world, such a party shall be entitled - despitethe issuance of the protection document - to continue to perform theseacts without expanding them.This right shall not be assigned ortransferred to others except with all parts of the firm or one of themincluding goodwill.
    ある者が，製品若しくは方法，設計，植物品種に関係する特許出願若しくは優先出願の出願日の前，又は設計が世界の何れかの場所において最初に商業利用される日の前に，誠実に製品を製造し，工業的方法を使用し，配置設計を組み入れた集積回路若しくは当該回路を含む商品を製造し，又は本格的な準備を行った場合は，その者は，保護書類の発行にも拘らず，当該行為を拡大することなく続行する権利を有する。この権利は，営業権を含む企業の全部又は一部と共にするのでなければ，他人に譲渡又は移転してはならない。 - 特許庁
  • (2) A declaration for the purposes of section 17(2) may be made after the date of filing if -- (a) it would cause -- (i) the application in suit to have a declared priority date, where there was none previously; or (ii) the declared priority date of the application in suit to be brought forward to an earlier date; (b) it is made within 16 months from -- (i) where sub-paragraph (a)(i) applies, the declared priority date; or (ii) where sub-paragraph (a)(ii) applies, the earlier date; (c) it is made on Patents Form 57; (d) the prescribed fee has been paid; and (e) the condition referred to in paragraph (4) is satisfied.
    (2) 第17条(2)適用上の宣言は，次の場合は，出願日後に行うことができる。 (a) 当該宣言を行うことにより， (i) 宣言された優先日を有さない問題の出願が優先日を有することになる場合，又は (ii) 問題の出願の宣言された優先日がそれより前の日に繰り上げられることになる場合 (b) 当該宣言を， (i) (a)(i)が該当するときに，宣言された優先日から16月以内に行う場合，又は (ii) (a)(ii)が該当するときに，当該それより前の日から16月以内に行う場合 (c) 当該宣言を特許様式57により行う場合 (d) 所定の手数料を納付している場合，及び (e) (4)にいう条件を満たしている場合 - 特許庁
  • (12) Where the applicant satisfies the Registrar that -- (a) because of an error made by the receiving Office, an international application for a patent (Singapore) has been accorded a date of filing which is incorrect; or (b) the priority claim made under Article 8(1) of the Patent Co-operation Treaty has been considered not to have been made by the receiving Office or the International Bureau because of an error made by the Office or the Bureau, the Registrar may amend any document received by the Registry from the receiving Office or the International Bureau or alter any period or time which is specified in the Act or these Rules as if the error were an error on the part of the Registry.
    (12) 出願人が登録官に次の事項を納得させた場合は，登録官は，当該誤記が登録局側による誤記であったとして，登録局が受理官庁若しくは国際事務局から受領した書類を補正するか又は法若しくは本規則において定める期間若しくは期日を変更することができる。 (a) 受理官庁の誤記により，国際特許出願(シンガポール)に不正確な出願日が付与されたこと，又は (b) 特許協力条約第8条(1)に基づいて行われた優先権主張について，受理官庁若しくは国際事務局の誤記のためこれが行われなかったと当該官庁若しくは当該事務局により判断されたこと - 特許庁
  • Where, under these Rules, any person is required to do any act or thing, or any document or evidence is required to be produced or filed, and it is shown to the satisfaction of the Registrar that from any reasonable cause that person is unable to do that act or thing, or that document or evidence cannot be produced or filed, the Registrar may, upon the production of such evidence and subject to such terms as he thinks fit, dispense with the doing of any such act or thing, or the production or filing of such document or evidence.
    本規則に基づいて，ある者がある行為若しくは事柄を行うことを要求され，又はある書類若しくは証拠を提示若しくは提出することを要求される場合において，その者が適切な理由により，当該行為若しくは事柄を行うことができないこと又は当該書類若しくは証拠を提示若しくは提出することができないことが，登録官が納得するように立証されたときは，登録官は，そのような証拠の提示により，かつ，適切と判断する条件に従うことを前提として，当該行為若しくは事柄の実行又は当該書類若しくは証拠の提示若しくは提出を免除することができる。 - 特許庁
＜前へ 1 2 .... 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 次へ＞

例文データの著作権について