「In ACT」を含む例文一覧(23622)

＜前へ 1 2 .... 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 .... 472 473 次へ＞
  • Article 10 (1) Notwithstanding Article 9(1) or (2), an applicant for design registration may obtain design registration of a design that is similar to another design selected from the applicant's own designs either for which an application for design registration has been filed or for which design registration has been granted (hereinafter the selected design is referred to as the "Principal Design" and a design similar to it is referred to as a "Related Design"), if the filing date of the application for design registration of the Related Design (or when the application for design registration of the Related Design contains a priority claim under Article 43(1), 43-2(1) or 43-2(2) of the Patent Act (Act No. 121 of 1959) as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 15 of this Act, the filing date of the earliest application, the filing date of an application that is deemed to be the earliest application under Article 4.C(4) of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of March 20, 1883, as revised at Brussels on December 14, 1900, at Washington on June 2, 1911, at Hague on November 6, 1925, at London on June 2, 1934, at Lisbon on October 31, 1958, and at Stockholm on July 14, 1967, or the filing date of an application that is recognized as the earliest application under Article 4.(A)2 of the Paris Convention, hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) is on or after the filing date of the application for design registration of the Principal Design and before the date when the design bulletin in which the application for design registration of the Principal Design is published under Article 20(3) (except for a design bulletin in which the matters listed in Article 20(3)(iv) were published under Article 20(4)) is issued.
    第十条　意匠登録出願人は、自己の意匠登録出願に係る意匠又は自己の登録意匠のうちから選択した一の意匠（以下「本意匠」という。）に類似する意匠（以下「関連意匠」という。）については、当該関連意匠の意匠登録出願の日（第十五条において準用する特許法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十一号）第四十三条第一項又は第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う意匠登録出願にあつては、最初の出願若しくは千九百年十二月十四日にブラッセルで、千九百十一年六月二日にワシントンで、千九百二十五年十一月六日にヘーグで、千九百三十四年六月二日にロンドンで、千九百五十八年十月三十一日にリスボンで及び千九百六十七年七月十四日にストックホルムで改正された工業所有権の保護に関する千八百八十三年三月二十日のパリ条約第四条Ｃ（４）の規定により最初の出願とみなされた出願又は同条Ａ（２）の規定により最初の出願と認められた出願の日。以下この項において同じ。）がその本意匠の意匠登録出願の日以後であつて、第二十条第三項の規定によりその本意匠の意匠登録出願が掲載された意匠公報（同条第四項の規定により同条第三項第四号に掲げる事項が掲載されたものを除く。）の発行の日前である場合に限り、第九条第一項又は第二項の規定にかかわらず、意匠登録を受けることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (24) Where a person in charge of handling custody and payment is entrusted by subcontract with custody of other specified foreign private bonds with the same issue as that of the specified foreign private bonds of which the person is directly entrusted with custody, when the person has received notice, as the relay point via which the notice shall be given pursuant to the provisions of Article 6, paragraph (7) of the Act, with regard to the interest recipient information for the interest from said other specified foreign private bonds, the person may, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance, give notice to provide the interest recipient information for the specified foreign private bonds of which the person is directly entrusted with custody together with the interest recipient information of which the person has received notice as such relay point, to the person who pays the interest (in the case where the interest is delivered via any other person in charge of handling payment with whom said person in charge of handling custody and payment has further entrusted custody, notice shall be given to the person who pays the interest via such other person in charge of handling payment). In this case, said notice shall be deemed to be notice of the interest recipient information given pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (7) of said Article.
    ２４　保管支払取扱者は、その保管の委託を受けている特定民間国外債と同一銘柄の他の特定民間国外債につき保管の再委託を受けている場合において、当該他の特定民間国外債の利子に係る利子受領者情報につき法第六条第七項に規定する経由のための通知を受けたときは、財務省令で定めるところにより、その保管の委託を受けている特定民間国外債の利子に係る利子受領者情報に当該経由のための通知を受けた利子受領者情報を合わせて、その利子の支払をする者に対し（その利子の交付が、当該保管支払取扱者が保管の再委託をしている他の支払の取扱者を通じて行われる場合には、当該他の支払の取扱者を経由してその利子の支払をする者に対し）通知をすることができる。この場合において、当該通知は、同項の規定による利子受領者情報の通知とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 48 Article 3, Article 8, paragraph (1), Article 9, Article 11, Article 16, Article 17, Article 22, Articles 24 to 26 inclusive, Articles 31 to 34 inclusive, Article 36, Article 37, Articles 39 to 43 inclusive, Articles 46 to 50, Article 52, Article 53, Article 61 and Articles 63 to 66 inclusive of the Act on the General Rules for Incorporated Administrative Agencies shall apply mutatis mutandis to the JLSC. In this case, the term "competent minister" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Minister of Justice", the term "ordinance of the competent ministry" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice", the terms "evaluation commission" and "said evaluation commission" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Evaluation Commission of the Japan Legal Support Center" and the terms listed in the middle column of the following table in the provisions given in the left-hand column of the same table shall be respectively deemed to be replaced with the terms in the right-hand column of the same table.
    第四十八条　独立行政法人通則法第三条、第八条第一項、第九条、第十一条、第十六条、第十七条、第二十二条、第二十四条から第二十六条まで、第三十一条から第三十四条まで、第三十六条、第三十七条、第三十九条から第四十三条まで、第四十六条から第五十条まで、第五十二条、第五十三条、第六十一条及び第六十三条から第六十六条までの規定は、支援センターについて準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「主務大臣」とあるのは「法務大臣」と、「主務省令」とあるのは「法務省令」と、「評価委員会」とあり、及び「当該評価委員会」とあるのは「日本司法支援センター評価委員会」と読み替えるほか、次の表の上欄に掲げる同法の規定中同表の中欄に掲げる字句は、それぞれ同表の下欄に掲げる字句に読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (d) In cases where the designation under this paragraph has been rescinded under the provisions of Article 52-84, paragraph (1) or an administrative disposition similar to said designation in a foreign state pursuant to the provisions of laws and regulations of the foreign state which are equivalent to this Act has been rescinded, a person who was an officer (including persons treated in the same manner under laws and regulations of a foreign state; the same shall apply in this sub-item (d)) of the juridical person within one month prior to the date of rescission and for whom five years have not passed since the date of rescission, or in cases where the designation under the provisions of other Acts which is specified by Cabinet Order as pertaining to business activities equivalent to Dispute Resolution, etc. or an administrative disposition similar to said designation in a foreign state as specified by Cabinet Order under the provisions of laws and regulations of the foreign state which are equivalent to said other Acts has been rescinded, a person who was an officer of the juridical person within one month prior to the date of rescission and for whom five years have not passed from the date of rescission; or
    ニ　第五十二条の八十四第一項の規定によりこの項の規定による指定を取り消された場合若しくはこの法律に相当する外国の法令の規定により当該外国において受けている当該指定に類する行政処分を取り消された場合において、その取消しの日前一月以内にその法人の役員（外国の法令上これと同様に取り扱われている者を含む。ニにおいて同じ。）であつた者でその取消しの日から五年を経過しない者又は他の法律の規定による指定であつて紛争解決等業務に相当する業務に係るものとして政令で定めるもの若しくは当該他の法律に相当する外国の法令の規定により当該外国において受けている当該政令で定める指定に類する行政処分を取り消された場合において、その取消しの日前一月以内にその法人の役員であつた者でその取消しの日から五年を経過しない者 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 7 (1) With regard to the application of the provision of Article 12, paragraph (3) of the Act on Collection, etc. of Insurance Premiums of Labor Insurance (hereinafter referred to as the "Collection Act") as revised by the provision of Article 2 to the businesses in respect of which the insurance relation of labor insurance pertaining to the industrial accident insurance prescribed by Article 3 of the Collection Act has been established as of December 31, 1980, the term "the lump sum compensation for surviving family" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the lump sum compensation for surviving family (limited to the case where the cause for such payment occurs after December 31, 1980)", the term "(hereinafter referred to as the "insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a specific disease" in this paragraph and in Article 20, paragraph (1))" with "(hereinafter referred to as the "insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a specific disease" in this paragraph; limited to the insurance benefits other than the insurance benefits paid as pension pertaining to the period after the same date and the insurance benefits paid as pension the cause for payment of which occurs after the same date)", the term "the amount obtained by multiplying...referred to as the "Class I adjustment rate")" with "the amount obtained by multiplying ...referred to as the "Class I adjustment rate") (or, if any period on or before the same date exists during the period being the basis of calculation of the general insurance premiums or the Class I special enrollment insurance premiums, the aggregate of the amount of the general insurance premiums after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the rate pertaining to commuting injury and the amount of the Class I special enrollment insurance premiums after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the rate pertaining to commuting injury, both pertaining to the period on or before the same date, plus the amount obtained by multiplying the aggregate of the amount of the general insurance premiums after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the rate pertaining to commuting injury and the amount of the Class I special enrollment insurance premiums after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the rate pertaining to commuting injury, both pertaining to the period after the same date, by the adjustment rate)", and the term "the same date" with "December 31".
    第七条　昭和五十五年十二月三十一日において、労働保険の保険料の徴収等に関する法律（以下「徴収等」という。）第三条に規定する労災保険に係る労働保険の保険関係が成立している事業に関する第二条の規定による改正後の徴収法第十二条第三項の規定の適用については、同項中「遺族補償一時金」とあるのは「遺族補償一時金（昭和五十五年十二月三十一日後に支給すべき事由が生じたものに限る。）」と、「（以下この項及び第二十条第一項において「特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付」という。）」とあるのは「（以下この項において「特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付」といい、同日後の期間に係る年金たる保険給付及び同日後に支給すべき事由が生じた年金たる保険給付以外の保険給付に限る。）」と、「乗じて得た額」とあるのは「乗じて得た額（一般保険料又は第一種特別加入保険料の額の算定の基礎となつた期間のうちに同日以前の期間がある場合には、同日以前の期間に係る一般保険料の額から通勤災害に係る率に応ずる部分の額を減じた額と第一種特別加入保険料の額から通勤災害に係る率に応ずる部分の額を減じた額とを合算した額に同日後の期間に係る一般保険料の額から通勤災害に係る率に応ずる部分の額を減じた額と第一種特別加入保険料の額から通勤災害に係る率に応ずる部分の額を減じた額とを合算した額に調整率を乗じて得た額を加えた額）」と、「同日を」とあるのは「十二月三十一日を」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (1) When an accused charge with an offence under section 73 or section 74 of this Act in relation to a registered trademark pleads that the registration of the trademarks is invalid, the following procedures shall be followed- (a) if the Magistrate is satisfied that such defense is prima facie tenable, he shall not proceed with the charge but shall adjourn the proceeding for three months from the date on which the plea of the accused is recorded to enable the accused to file an application before the High Court Division under this Act, for the rectification of the Register on the ground that the registration is invalid. (b) if the accused proves to the Magistrate that he has made such application within the time so limited or such further time as the Magistrate may for sufficient cause allow, the further proceedings in the prosecution shall be stayed by the Magistrate till the disposal of such application for rectification and of the appeal, if any, there from. (c) if within a period of three months or within such extended time as my be allowed by the Magistrate, the accused fails to apply to the High Court Division for rectification of the Register, the Magistrate shall proceed with the case as if the registration were valid.
    (1)本法第73条又は第74条に基づき、登録された商標に関する罪の被疑者が、当該商標の登録が無効であることを主張する場合、次に掲げる手順に従う。(a)治安判事が、かかる抗弁が一見して明らかに支持できることを確信した場合、同判事は起訴を行わず、被疑者が当該登録の無効を理由として登録簿の是正を求める申立書を本法に基づき高等裁判所に提出できるよう、被疑者の抗弁が記録された日から3月間訴追手続きを中断する。(b)被疑者がそのような期限内に、又は治安判事が十分な根拠に基づき認める追加期間内に当該申立てを行ったことを治安判事に証明すると、当該訴追手続きは、是正を求める当該申立て及び不服申立てがあればそれが処理されるまで、さらなる手続きは治安判事により中断される。(c)3月以内又は治安判事が認める延長期間内に、被告の登録簿の是正を求める高等裁判所への申立てを怠る場合、治安判事は当該登録が有効であるかのように当該事件を進行させる。 - 特許庁
  • Article 286 In cases of the person detained in a detention facility pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) under Article 15, the detention facility, detention services manager, and detention officer shall be respectively deemed as the penal institution, warden of the penal institution, and staff member of the penal institution, and the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 64, paragraph (3) of Article 65, paragraph (2) of Article 70, paragraph (2) of Article 73, Article 78, the second sentence of Article 80, paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 98, Article286-2, Articles 366 and 367, and paragraph (2) of Article 481 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the provisions of the first sentence of Article 28, Articles 29 to 32 inclusive, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of Article 48, paragraphs (2) and (3) of Article 48-3, Articles 50 and 52, paragraph (2) of Article 54, paragraph (3) of Article 55-2, and paragraph (2) of Article 57 of the Offenders Prevention and Rehabilitation Act, and the provision of paragraph (3) of Article 102 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Act No. 109 of 1996) shall apply thereto.
    第二百八十六条　第十五条第一項の規定により留置施設に留置される者については、留置施設を刑事施設と、留置業務管理者を刑事施設の長と、留置担当官を刑事施設職員とみなして、刑事訴訟法第六十四条第一項、第六十五条第三項、第七十条第二項、第七十三条第二項、第七十八条、第八十条後段、第九十八条第一項及び第二項、第二百八十六条の二、第三百六十六条、第三百六十七条並びに第四百八十一条第二項、犯罪者予防更生法第二十八条前段、第二十九条から第三十二条まで、第四十八条第二項から第四項まで、第四十八条の三第二項及び第三項、第五十条、第五十二条、第五十四条第二項、第五十五条の二第三項並びに第五十七条第二項並びに民事訴訟法（平成八年法律第百九号）第百二条第三項の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 1. In cases where the travel does not include any travel between Japan (meaning Japan as prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Act on Travel Expenses of National Public Servants (Act No. 114 of 1950); the same shall apply hereinafter) and a foreign state (meaning territories other than the territory of Japan (including international waters); the same shall apply hereinafter), the amount specified by the Supreme Court as the amount of transportation expenses normally required to travel the distance between the place where the principal building of the summary court that has jurisdiction over the location of the general venue of the party, etc. is located and the place where the principal building of the summary court that has jurisdiction over the place where the party, etc. appears, on the basis of such distance (if these places are the same, the amount specified by the Supreme Court); provided, however, that the amount of transportation expenses actually paid shall apply when the party, etc. submits documents such as receipts, train tickets, airline boarding pass stubs, and the like, which clearly indicate that the travel used an ordinary route and means and that the amount actually paid exceeds the amount specified by the Supreme Court;
    （１）　旅行が本邦（国家公務員等の旅費に関する法律（昭和二十五年法律第百十四号）第二条第一項第四号に規定する本邦をいう。以下同じ。）と外国（本邦以外の領域（公海を含む。）をいう。以下同じ。）との間のものを含まない場合においては、当事者等の普通裁判籍の所在地を管轄する簡易裁判所の主たる庁舎の所在する場所と出頭した場所を管轄する簡易裁判所の主たる庁舎の所在する場所との間の距離を基準として、その距離を旅行するときに通常要する交通費の額として最高裁判所が定める額（これらの場所が同一となるときは、最高裁判所が定める額）。ただし、旅行が通常の経路及び方法によるものであること並びに現に支払つた交通費の額が当該最高裁判所が定める額を超えることを明らかにする領収書、乗車券、航空機の搭乗券の控え等の文書が提出されたときは、現に支払つた交通費の額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (ix) When he/she has failed to state or record the matters required to be stated or recorded or made a false statement or record in the articles of incorporation, minutes of general meeting of members, General Meeting, Organizational Meeting, board of directors, committee on important property, Committees, board of company auditors, policyholders meeting, General Meeting of Policyholders, bondholders meeting or creditors meeting, roster of members, accounting books, balance sheet, profit and loss statement, business report, annexed detailed statement of Article 494, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 54-3, paragraph (2) or Article 180-17, accounting advisory report, audit report, accounting auditing report, statement of accounts, bond registry, inventory of property, business report, or document or electromagnetic record set forth in Article 682, paragraph (1) or Article 695, paragraph (1), Article 165-2, paragraph (1), Article 165-9, paragraph (1), Article 165-13, paragraph (1), Article 165-15, paragraph (1), Article 165-19, paragraph (1) or Article 165-21, paragraph (1) of the same Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 61-5;
    九　定款、社員総会、総代会、創立総会、取締役会、重要財産委員会、委員会、監査役会、保険契約者総会、保険契約者総代会、社債権者集会若しくは債権者集会の議事録、社員の名簿、会計帳簿、貸借対照表、損益計算書、事業報告、第五十四条の三第二項若しくは第百八十条の十七において準用する会社法第四百九十四条第一項の附属明細書、会計参与報告、監査報告、会計監査報告、決算報告、社債原簿、財産目録、事務報告又は第六十一条の五において準用する同法第六百八十二条第一項若しくは第六百九十五条第一項、第百六十五条の二第一項、第百六十五条の九第一項、第百六十五条の十三第一項、第百六十五条の十五第一項、第百六十五条の十九第一項若しくは第百六十五条の二十一第一項の書面若しくは電磁的記録に記載し、若しくは記録すべき事項を記載せず、若しくは記録せず、又は虚偽の記載若しくは記録をしたとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (9) For the time being, the State may, within the scope of the budget, provide a loan without interest of an amount equivalent to the amount that the State may subsidize pursuant to the provisions of Article 75, paragraph (2) (in the case where any law or ordinance stipulates otherwise with regard to the proportion of subsidy by the State under these provisions, they shall include the provisions of said law or ordinance that stipulates otherwise; the same shall apply hereinafter) to a prefecture (in the case where the affairs under Article 74, paragraph (1), which are to be processed by a prefecture, are to be processed by a designated city, etc., pursuant to the provisions of Article 84-2, paragraph (1), this shall include said designated city, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and paragraphs (12) to (14) of the Supplementary Provisions) for the funds to be allocated to the expenses subsidized by said prefecture for the establisher of a public assistance facility other than said prefecture, with regard to a repair, renovation or expansion of a public assistance facility of which expenses may be subsidized by the State pursuant to the provisions of Article 75, paragraph (2) and which falls under Article 2, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Promotion of Social Infrastructure Development Through Use of Proceeds from Sale of the Stock of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Act No. 86 of 1987).
    ９　国は、当分の間、都道府県（第八十四条の二第一項の規定により、都道府県が処理することとされている第七十四条第一項の事務を指定都市等が処理する場合にあつては、当該指定都市等を含む。以下この項及び附則第十二項から第十四項までにおいて同じ。）に対し、第七十五条第二項の規定により国がその費用について補助することができる保護施設の修理、改造又は拡張で日本電信電話株式会社の株式の売払収入の活用による社会資本の整備の促進に関する特別措置法（昭和六十二年法律第八十六号）第二条第一項第二号に該当するものにつき、都道府県以外の保護施設の設置者に対し当該都道府県が補助する費用に充てる資金について、予算の範囲内において、第七十五条第二項の規定（この規定による国の補助の割合について、この規定と異なる定めをした法令の規定がある場合には、当該異なる定めをした法令の規定を含む。以下同じ。）により国が補助することができる金額に相当する金額を無利子で貸し付けることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (9) When an entrepreneur of juridical person, the appointment and dismissal of officers or the conduct or existence in business of which is controlled by another entrepreneur of juridical person whose capital or total contributions exceeds 10 million yen, receives a manufacturing or other contract from the said entrepreneur and subcontracts of all or a considerable part of the act of manufacture, repair, creation or provision pertaining to such manufacturing or other contract with a third entrepreneur (excluding the cases where a person coming under items (i) or (ii) of Paragraph 7 above concludes the manufacturing or other contract with another person who falls under items (i) or (ii) respectively of the preceding paragraph and cases where a person falling under items (iii) and (iv) of the paragraph above concludes an information-based product creation contract or a service contract with another person who falls under items (iii) and (iv) respectively of the preceding paragraph), and when the entrepreneur who receives such subcontract would fall under the items of the preceding paragraph if he were to receive the said manufacturing or other contract directly from the said entrepreneur who controls the appointment and dismissal of officers, or conduct or existence in the business, the entrepreneur who concludes such subcontract shall be deemed, in the application of this Act, to be a main subcontracting entrepreneur and the entrepreneur who receives such subcontract shall be deemed to be a subcontractor.
    ９　資本金の額又は出資の総額が千万円を超える法人たる事業者から役員の任免、業務の執行又は存立について支配を受け、かつ、その事業者から製造委託等を受ける法人たる事業者が、その製造委託等に係る製造、修理、作成又は提供の行為の全部又は相当部分について再委託をする場合（第七項第一号又は第二号に該当する者がそれぞれ前項第一号又は第二号に該当する者に対し製造委託等をする場合及び第七項第三号又は第四号に該当する者がそれぞれ前項第三号又は第四号に該当する者に対し情報成果物作成委託又は役務提供委託をする場合を除く。）において、再委託を受ける事業者が、役員の任免、業務の執行又は存立について支配をし、かつ、製造委託等をする当該事業者から直接製造委託等を受けるものとすれば前項各号のいずれかに該当することとなる事業者であるときは、この法律の適用については、再委託をする事業者は親事業者と、再委託を受ける事業者は下請事業者とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 66 (1) A Municipality, in a case when an Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., that is a Primary Insured Person that is a person delinquent in payment of an insurance premium (except for those who can receive a medical allowance for general disease pursuant to the Act for Medical Measures for the Victims of the Atomic Bomb (Act No. 117 of 1994) and other benefits for medical care as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare) fails to pay said insurance premium from the payment due date of said insurance premium until the expiry of the period as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, except for a case when it is determined that there is a special circumstance for said delinquency of insurance premium payment such as a disaster or other special circumstances provided by a Cabinet Order, shall request said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., to submit the Certificate of Insured Person, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, and enter on said Certificate of Insured Person that the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (6), Article 42-2, paragraph (6), Article 46, paragraph (4), Article 48, paragraph (4), Article 51-2, paragraph (4), Article 53, paragraph (4), Article 54-2, paragraph (6), Article 58, paragraph (4) and Article 61-2, paragraph (4) shall not apply (herein referred to as "Entry of Change of Payment Method" in this Article and paragraph (3) of the following Article).
    第六十六条　市町村は、保険料を滞納している第一号被保険者である要介護被保険者等（原子爆弾被爆者に対する援護に関する法律（平成六年法律第百十七号）による一般疾病医療費の支給その他厚生労働省令で定める医療に関する給付を受けることができるものを除く。）が、当該保険料の納期限から厚生労働省令で定める期間が経過するまでの間に当該保険料を納付しない場合においては、当該保険料の滞納につき災害その他の政令で定める特別の事情があると認める場合を除き、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、当該要介護被保険者等に対し被保険者証の提出を求め、当該被保険者証に、第四十一条第六項、第四十二条の二第六項、第四十六条第四項、第四十八条第四項、第五十一条の二第四項、第五十三条第四項、第五十四条の二第六項、第五十八条第四項及び第六十一条の二第四項の規定を適用しない旨の記載（以下この条及び次条第三項において「支払方法変更の記載」という。）をするものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 27-11 (1) A Tender Offeror may not withdraw offers or cancel contracts pertaining to the Tender Offer (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Withdrawal, etc. of Tender Offer") after having once made the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer; provided, however, that this shall not apply in cases where the Tender Offeror states as one of the Terms of Purchase, etc. in the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer and Tender Offer Notification that the Tender Offer may be withdrawn if there occurs any important change in the business or property of the Issuer of the Share Certificates, etc. for which the Tender Offer is made or its Subsidiary (meaning Subsidiary as defined in Article 2(iii) of the Companies Act) or there occurs any other circumstance that would significantly impede the achievement of the purpose of the Tender Offer (limited to those specified by a Cabinet Order), or where a decision of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings is made against the Tender Offeror or there occurs any other material change in circumstances as specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第二十七条の十一　公開買付者は、公開買付開始公告をした後においては、公開買付けに係る申込みの撤回及び契約の解除（以下この節において「公開買付けの撤回等」という。）を行うことができない。ただし、公開買付者が公開買付開始公告及び公開買付届出書において公開買付けに係る株券等の発行者若しくはその子会社（会社法第二条第三号に規定する子会社をいう。）の業務若しくは財産に関する重要な変更その他の公開買付けの目的の達成に重大な支障となる事情（政令で定めるものに限る。）が生じたときは公開買付けの撤回等をすることがある旨の条件を付した場合又は公開買付者に関し破産手続開始の決定その他の政令で定める重要な事情の変更が生じた場合には、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 40-3 With regard to the rights listed in Article 2(2)(v) or (vi) or the Securities listed in Article 2(1)(xxi) (limited to those specified by a Cabinet Order) or the rights listed in Article 2(2)(vii) (limited to those specified by a Cabinet Order), a Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. may not conduct any of the acts listed in Article 2(8)(i), (ii) or (vii) to (ix) unless the relevant right or Securities are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as those for which it is ensured by means of a contract or other juristic act pertaining to the right or Securities that the money invested or contributed for the right or Securities (including those specified by a Cabinet Order as being similar to money; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) is managed separately from the property that belongs to the person who conducts the relevant business to be operated using such money, or any other property pertaining to other businesses conducted by that person.
    第四十条の三　金融商品取引業者等は、第二条第二項第五号若しくは第六号に掲げる権利又は同条第一項第二十一号に掲げる有価証券（政令で定めるものに限る。）若しくは同条第二項第七号に掲げる権利（政令で定めるものに限る。）については、当該権利又は有価証券に関し出資され、又は拠出された金銭（これに類するものとして政令で定めるものを含む。以下この条において同じ。）が、当該金銭を充てて行われる事業を行う者の固有財産その他当該者の行う他の事業に係る財産と分別して管理することが当該権利又は有価証券に係る契約その他の法律行為において確保されているものとして内閣府令で定めるものでなければ、第二条第八項第一号、第二号又は第七号から第九号までに掲げる行為を行つてはならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (28) Where a specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. has received the notice prescribed in paragraph (25) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (26)), it shall, on each occasion of receiving the notice, for each person who has submitted a written application for tax exemption of book-entry transfer national government bonds or written application for tax exemption of book-entry transfer local government bonds (in the case where the person who has submitted the said written application for tax exemption of book-entry transfer national government bonds or written application for tax exemption of book-entry transfer local government bonds is the trustee of a qualified foreign securities investment trust, for each person who has submitted the said written application for tax exemption of book-entry transfer national government bonds or written application for tax exemption of book-entry transfer local government bonds and for each qualified foreign securities investment trust accepted thereby), enter or record in the books prescribed in Article 5-2(14) of the Act the matters mentioned in the said notice, and preserve the said books pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance.
    ２８　特定振替機関等は、第二十五項（第二十六項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する通知を受けた場合には、当該通知を受けた事項を、その通知を受けた都度、振替国債非課税適用申告書を提出した者又は振替地方債非課税適用申告書を提出した者の各人別（当該振替国債非課税適用申告書を提出した者又は振替地方債非課税適用申告書を提出した者が適格外国証券投資信託の受託者である場合にあつては、当該振替国債非課税適用申告書を提出した者又は振替地方債非課税適用申告書を提出した者の各人別及びその受託した適格外国証券投資信託の別）に、法第五条の二第十四項に規定する帳簿に記載し、又は記録し、かつ、当該帳簿を財務省令で定めるところにより保存しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 176 The liquidator(s) of a Liquidating Insurance Company, etc. (other than the liquidator(s) in the case of a special liquidation) shall, when the Shareholders Meeting, etc. has approved the material set forth in Article 492, paragraph (3) (Preparation of Inventory of Property) or Article 497, paragraph (2) (Provision of Balance Sheet to Annual Shareholders Meeting) (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-17), or Article 507, paragraph (3) (Conclusion of Liquidation) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 183, paragraph (1)) of the Companies Act, submit such material (or, where such material is prepared in the form of electromagnetic record or where an electromagnetic record is prepared in lieu of such material, the electromagnetic record specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance or a document describing the information contained in the electromagnetic record) without delay to the Prime Minister.
    第百七十六条　清算保険会社等の清算人（特別清算の場合の清算人を除く。）は、会社法第四百九十二条第三項（財産目録等の作成等）若しくは第四百九十七条第二項（貸借対照表等の定時株主総会への提出等）（これらの規定を第百八十条の十七において準用する場合を含む。）又は第五百七条第三項（清算事務の終了等）（第百八十三条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により株主総会等においてこれらの規定に規定するものについて承認を得たときは、遅滞なく、これらの規定に規定するもの（電磁的記録で作成され、又はその作成に代えて電磁的記録の作成がされているときは、内閣府令で定める電磁的記録又は当該電磁的記録に記録された情報の内容を記載した書面）を内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) In the case prescribed in the preceding paragraph, with regard to a rehabilitation claim modified pursuant to the provision of said paragraph that is not a claim without objection or valued claim, until the payment period specified in the rehabilitation plan expires (or until payment based on the rehabilitation plan is completed or the rehabilitation plan is revoked, if these events occur prior to the expiration of said period; the same shall apply in the following paragraph and paragraph (5)), it is not allowed to make or receive payment or conduct any other act to cause the claim to be extinguished (excluding a release); provided, however, that this shall not apply if the rehabilitation creditor was unable to file a proof of claim regarding such modified rehabilitation claim within the period for filing proofs of claims due to grounds not attributable thereto and such grounds have not ceased to exist before the order prescribed in Article 230(3) is made, or the modified rehabilitation claim was subject to the valuation of rehabilitation claim.
    ３　前項に規定する場合における同項の規定により変更された再生債権であって無異議債権及び評価済債権以外のものについては、再生計画で定められた弁済期間が満了する時（その期間の満了前に、再生計画に基づく弁済が完了した場合又は再生計画が取り消された場合にあっては弁済が完了した時又は再生計画が取り消された時。次項及び第五項において同じ。）までの間は、弁済をし、弁済を受け、その他これを消滅させる行為（免除を除く。）をすることができない。ただし、当該変更に係る再生債権が、再生債権者がその責めに帰することができない事由により債権届出期間内に届出をすることができず、かつ、その事由が第二百三十条第三項に規定する決定前に消滅しなかったもの又は再生債権の評価の対象となったものであるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (ii) Subscription for shares, share options (excluding those attached to bonds with share option), or Bonds with Share Options, etc. (meaning Bonds with Share Options, etc. as defined in Article 5, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Investment Business Corporation Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item and in the following paragraph), and the holding of the shares, the share options (including the shares issued or transferred through the exercise of the share options), or the Bonds with Share Options, etc. (including the shares issued or transferred through the exercise of the share options attached to the Bonds with Share Options, etc.) pertaining to such subscription, which have been issued by a stock company with stated capital exceeding 300,000,000 yen that is a Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Operator being a Certified Research and Development Business Operator or a Supervisory Business Operator in order to raise the funds required for the purpose of engaging in Research and Development Business or Supervisory Business according to a Certified Research and Development Business Plan or a Certified Supervisory Business Plan.
    二 認定研究開発事業者又は認定統括事業者である中小企業者のうち資本金の額が三億円を超える株式会社が認定研究開発事業計画又は認定統括事業計画に従って研究開発事業又は統括事業を行うために必要とする資金の調達を図るために発行する株式、新株予約権（新株予約権付社債に付されたものを除く。）又は新株予約権付社債等（中小企業投資育成株式会社法第五条第一項第二号に規定する新株予約権付社債等をいう。以下この号及び次項において同じ。）の引受け及び当該引受けに係る株式、新株予約権（その行使により発行され、又は移転された株式を含む。）又は新株予約権付社債等（新株予約権付社債等に付された新株予約権の行使により発行され、又は移転された株式を含む。）の保有 - 経済産業省
  • Article 976 When an incorporator, Director at Incorporation, Company Auditor at Incorporation, Executive Officer at Incorporation, director, accounting advisor or member who is to perform the duties thereof, company auditor, executive officer, accounting auditor or member who is to perform the duties thereof, liquidator, liquidator's agent, member who executes the business of a Membership Company, person to perform duties on behalf of a director, company auditor, executive officer, liquidator or partner who executes the business of a Membership Company who has been appointed based on a provisional disposition order under the provisions of Article 56 of the Civil Provisional Remedies Act, person who is temporarily to perform the duties of a director, accounting advisor, company auditor, Representative Director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer prescribed in Article 960(1)(v), person who is temporarily to perform the duties of a liquidator or representative liquidator prescribed in paragraph (2)(iii) of that Article, person who is temporarily to perform the duties of an accounting auditor prescribed in Article 967(1)(iii), inspector, supervisor, investigator, Administrator of the Shareholder Registry, manager of the Bond Registry, bond manager, bond manager to succeed to the administration of the bonds, representative bondholder, Resolution Administrator, Foreign Company's representative in Japan or manager falls under any one of the following items, such person shall be punished by a non-penal fine of not more than one million yen; provided, however, that this shall not apply when such act should be made subject to a criminal punishment:
    第九百七十六条　発起人、設立時取締役、設立時監査役、設立時執行役、取締役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、執行役、会計監査人若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、清算人、清算人代理、持分会社の業務を執行する社員、民事保全法第五十六条に規定する仮処分命令により選任された取締役、監査役、執行役、清算人若しくは持分会社の業務を執行する社員の職務を代行する者、第九百六十条第一項第五号に規定する一時取締役、会計参与、監査役、代表取締役、委員、執行役若しくは代表執行役の職務を行うべき者、同条第二項第三号に規定する一時清算人若しくは代表清算人の職務を行うべき者、第九百六十七条第一項第三号に規定する一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者、検査役、監督委員、調査委員、株主名簿管理人、社債原簿管理人、社債管理者、事務を承継する社債管理者、代表社債権者、決議執行者、外国会社の日本における代表者又は支配人は、次のいずれかに該当する場合には、百万円以下の過料に処する。ただし、その行為について刑を科すべきときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) Where a seller concludes a Specified Right Sales Contract, the purchaser of the rights to receive offer of the Specified Continuous Services may terminate the Specified Right Sales Contract when eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 42 (3) (if the purchaser of the rights to receive offer of the Specified Continuous Services had not rescinded the Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 48 (1) by said time limit due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 44 (1), information concerning the rescission of the Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of Paragraph 1 of this article, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services in violation of the provision of Article 44 (3), it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services received a document, which has been issued by the Service Provider pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry referred to in the same paragraph and contains a notice to the effect that the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services may rescind said Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of the same paragraph).
    ３　販売業者が特定権利販売契約を締結した場合におけるその特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者は、第四十二条第三項の書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後（その特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者が、販売業者が第四十四条第一項の規定に違反して前条第一項の規定による特定権利販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は販売業者が第四十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに前条第一項の規定による特定権利販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者が、当該販売業者が同項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による当該特定権利販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後）においては、その特定権利販売契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 to Article 839 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(a)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the incorporation of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "Shareholder, etc. (meaning a shareholder, director or liquidator (or, for a Company with Company Auditors, it means a shareholder, director, company auditor or liquidator, and for a Company with Committees, it means a shareholder, director, executive officer or liquidator); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    ３　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号イに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この節において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, where a juridical person holds the majority of voting rights (excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which may not be exercised for all matters that may be resolved at a shareholders meeting, and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provision of Article 879(3) of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005); hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph, Article 59(3)(ii) and (4) and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(a) and (b)) of all shareholders of a stock company, if a rehabilitation case or reorganization case (hereinafter referred to as a "rehabilitation case, etc." in this Article) is pending against said juridical person (hereinafter referred to as a "parent juridical person" in this Article and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(b)), a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings against said stock company (hereinafter referred to as a "subsidiary stock company" in this Article and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(b)) may also be filed with the district court before which the rehabilitation case, etc. against the parent juridical person is pending, and if a rehabilitation case, etc. is pending against the subsidiary stock company, a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings against the parent juridical person may also be filed with the district court before which the rehabilitation case, etc. against the subsidiary stock company is pending.
    ３　前二項の規定にかかわらず、法人が株式会社の総株主の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法（平成十七年法律第八十六号）第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。次項、第五十九条第三項第二号及び第四項並びに第百二十七条の二第二項第二号イ及びロにおいて同じ。）の過半数を有する場合には、当該法人（以下この条及び第百二十七条の二第二項第二号ロにおいて「親法人」という。）について再生事件又は更生事件（以下この条において「再生事件等」という。）が係属しているときにおける当該株式会社（以下この条及び第百二十七条の二第二項第二号ロにおいて「子株式会社」という。）についての再生手続開始の申立ては、親法人の再生事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができ、子株式会社について再生事件等が係属しているときにおける親法人についての再生手続開始の申立ては、子株式会社の再生事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, where a juridical person holds the majority of voting rights (excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which may not be exercised for all matters that may be resolved at a shareholders meeting, and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provision of Article 879(3) of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005); hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph, Article 83(2)(ii) and (3) and Article 161(2)(ii)(a) and (b)) of all shareholders of a stock company, if a bankruptcy case, rehabilitation case or reorganization case (hereinafter referred to as a "bankruptcy case, etc." in this Article) is pending against said juridical person (hereinafter referred to as a "parent juridical person" in this Article and Article 161(2)(ii)(b)), a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings against said stock company (hereinafter referred to as a "subsidiary stock company" in this Article and Article 161(2)(ii)(b)) may also be filed with the district court before which the bankruptcy case, etc. against the parent juridical person is pending, and if a bankruptcy case, etc. is pending against the subsidiary stock company, a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings against the parent juridical person may also be filed with the district court before which the bankruptcy case, etc. against the subsidiary stock company is pending.
    ３　前二項の規定にかかわらず、法人が株式会社の総株主の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法（平成十七年法律第八十六号）第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。次項、第八十三条第二項第二号及び第三項並びに第百六十一条第二項第二号イ及びロにおいて同じ。）の過半数を有する場合には、当該法人（以下この条及び第百六十一条第二項第二号ロにおいて「親法人」という。）について破産事件、再生事件又は更生事件（以下この条において「破産事件等」という。）が係属しているときにおける当該株式会社（以下この条及び第百六十一条第二項第二号ロにおいて「子株式会社」という。）についての破産手続開始の申立ては、親法人の破産事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができ、子株式会社について破産事件等が係属しているときにおける親法人についての破産手続開始の申立ては、子株式会社の破産事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 115-16 (1) A mayor of a Municipality, when it is determined that a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care does not act in compliance with the provision provided when providing said appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 115-11, paragraph (5), does not meet the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in Article 115-13, paragraph (1) or the fixed minimum number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph or standards concerning employees that engage in Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care provided by paragraph (4) of the same Article, with regard to knowledge, skill, or number of employees of the Business Office pertaining to said appointment as service provider, or when it is determined that said Community-Based Preventive Long-Term Care Service does not operate an appropriate Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care in accordance with standards concerning effective support methods for Prevention of Long-Term Care pertaining to a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care and standards concerning facilities and management of the business of Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in paragraph (2) or paragraph (4) of the same Article, may specify a due date and recommend to said Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care to act in compliance with the provisions provided when determining said appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 115-11, paragraph (5), to comply with the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in Article 115-13, paragraph (1), to employ the number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph, to comply with standards concerning employees that engage in Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, and to comply with standards concerning effective support methods for Prevention of Long-Term Care pertaining to a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care and standards concerning facilities and management of the business of Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed by paragraph (2) and paragraph (4) of the same Article.
    第百十五条の十六　市町村長は、指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者が、第百十五条の十一第五項の規定により当該指定を行うに当たって付された条件に従わず、当該指定に係る事業所の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第百十五条の十三第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数若しくは同条第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに従事する従業者に関する基準を満たしておらず、又は同条第二項若しくは第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準に従って適正な指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者に対し、期限を定めて、第百十五条の十一第五項の規定により当該指定を行うに当たって付された条件に従い、第百十五条の十三第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数の従業者を有し、若しくは同条第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに従事する従業者に関する基準を遵守し、又は同条第二項若しくは第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) With respect to the application of the provisions of item (i) of the preceding paragraph, in the case where payment has been made for two or more dividends of surplus, etc. whose base dates for the payment are included in the base business year, with regard to a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. related to a domestic corporation prescribed in Article 66-8(1) of the Act (where payment was made for the said two or more dividends of surplus, etc. on a day within a business year or consolidated business year preceding the applicable business year pertaining to the base business year for the said dividend of surplus, etc. (hereinafter such paid dividend of surplus, etc. shall be referred to as a "specified dividend of surplus, etc." in this paragraph), excluding the said two or more dividends of surplus) (including the cases where payment has been made for a specified dividend of surplus, etc. and payment has not been made for a dividend of surplus, etc. whose base date for payment is included in the said base business year, up to the day on which six months have elapsed after the final day of the base business year for the said specified dividend of surplus, etc.); the amount specified in item (i) of the preceding paragraph shall be the amount obtained by multiplying the excess amount when the amount listed in item (i) exceeds the amount listed in item (ii) by the ratio prescribed in item (i) of the said paragraph and then deducting therefrom the amounts listed in item (iii) and item (iv):
    ３　法第六十六条の八第一項に規定する内国法人に係る特定外国子会社等につき基準事業年度の期間内の日をその支払に係る基準日とする二以上の剰余金の配当等（当該二以上の剰余金の配当等が当該剰余金の配当等に係る基準事業年度に係る適用事業年度前の事業年度又は連結事業年度の期間内の日に支払われた剰余金の配当等（以下この項において「特定剰余金配当等」という。）である場合の当該二以上の剰余金の配当等を除く。）の支払があつた場合（特定剰余金配当等の支払があつた場合において、当該特定剰余金配当等に係る基準事業年度終了の日から六月を経過する日までに当該基準事業年度の期間内の日をその支払に係る基準日とする剰余金の配当等の支払がないときを含む。）における前項第一号の規定の適用については、同号に定める金額は、第一号に掲げる金額が第二号に掲げる金額を超えることとなる場合の当該超える部分の金額に同項第一号に規定する割合を乗じて計算した金額から第三号及び第四号に掲げる金額を控除した残額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (5) The normal profit margin specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 68-88(2)(i)(b) of the Act shall be the ratio of the amount of gross profits gained by a person who purchased the same or similar inventory assets as those for a foreign affiliated transaction prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article (hereinafter referred to as a "foreign affiliated transaction" in this Article) from a person who is not in a special relationship (meaning a special relationship prescribed in the said paragraph) (hereinafter such person who is not in such special relationship shall be referred to as a "non-affiliated person" through to paragraph (7) and such person who purchased such inventory assets shall be referred to as a "reseller" in this paragraph and paragraph (7)(ii)) through a transaction to sell the said same or similar inventory assets to a non-affiliated person (hereinafter referred to as a "comparison purpose transaction" in this paragraph) (such gross profits shall mean the amount obtained by deducting the sum of the costs of the said inventory assets for a comparison purpose transaction from the total revenue arising from the sale of the said inventory assets for a comparison purpose transaction) against the sum of the said revenue; provided, however, that where functions performed by the selling side or any other matters differ between a comparison purpose transaction and a transaction in which the purchasing side of the said inventory assets for a foreign affiliated transaction sold the inventory assets to a non-affiliated person, such normal profit margin shall be the ratio after making the necessary adjustment for the differences in ratios caused by such disparity.
    ５　法第六十八条の八十八第二項第一号ロに規定する政令で定める通常の利益率は、同条第一項に規定する国外関連取引（以下この条において「国外関連取引」という。）に係る棚卸資産と同種又は類似の棚卸資産を、特殊の関係（同項に規定する特殊の関係をいう。）にない者（以下第七項までにおいて「非関連者」という。）から購入した者（以下この項及び第七項第二号において「再販売者」という。）が当該同種又は類似の棚卸資産を非関連者に対して販売した取引（以下この項において「比較対象取引」という。）に係る当該再販売者の売上総利益の額（当該比較対象取引に係る棚卸資産の販売による収入金額の合計額から当該比較対象取引に係る棚卸資産の原価の額の合計額を控除した金額をいう。）の当該収入金額の合計額に対する割合とする。ただし、比較対象取引と当該国外関連取引に係る棚卸資産の買手が当該棚卸資産を非関連者に対して販売した取引とが売手の果たす機能その他において差異がある場合には、その差異により生ずる割合の差につき必要な調整を加えた後の割合とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) With respect to the application of the provisions of item (i) of the preceding paragraph, in the case where payment has been made for two or more dividends of surplus, etc. whose base dates for the payment are included in the base business year, with regard to a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. related to a consolidated corporation prescribed in Article 68-92(1) of the Act (where payment was made for the said two or more dividends of surplus, etc. on a day within a consolidated business year or business year preceding the applicable consolidated business year pertaining to the base business year for the said dividends of surplus, etc. (hereinafter such paid dividends of surplus, etc. shall be referred to as "specified dividends of surplus, etc." in this paragraph), excluding the said two or more dividends of surplus) (including the cases where payment has been made for specified dividends of surplus, etc. and payment has not been made for dividends of surplus, etc. whose base dates for the payment are included in the said base business year, up to the day on which six months have elapsed after the final day of the base business year for the said specified dividends of surplus, etc.); the amount specified in item (i) of the preceding paragraph shall be the amount obtained by multiplying the excess amount when the amount listed in item (i) exceeds the amount listed in item (ii) by the ratio prescribed in item (i) of the said paragraph and then deducting therefrom the amounts listed in item (iii) and item (iv):
    ３　法第六十八条の九十二第一項に規定する連結法人に係る特定外国子会社等につき基準事業年度の期間内の日をその支払に係る基準日とする二以上の剰余金の配当等（当該二以上の剰余金の配当等が当該剰余金の配当等に係る基準事業年度に係る適用連結事業年度前の連結事業年度又は事業年度の期間内の日に支払われた剰余金の配当等（以下この項において「特定剰余金配当等」という。）である場合の当該二以上の剰余金の配当等を除く。）の支払があつた場合（特定剰余金配当等の支払があつた場合において、当該特定剰余金配当等に係る基準事業年度終了の日から六月を経過する日までに当該基準事業年度の期間内の日をその支払に係る基準日とする剰余金の配当等の支払がないときを含む。）における前項第一号の規定の適用については、同号に定める金額は、第一号に掲げる金額が第二号に掲げる金額を超えることとなる場合の当該超える部分の金額に同項第一号に規定する割合を乗じて計算した金額から第三号及び第四号に掲げる金額を控除した残額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (4) Where the Registrar is of the opinion that any document submitted to him - (a) contains any matter contrary to law; or (b) by reason of any omission or misdescription has not been duly completed; or (c) does not comply with the requirements of this Act; or (d) contains any error, alteration or erasure, he may refuse to receive or register the document and request that the document be appropriately amended or completed or re-submitted, or that a fresh document be submitted in its place.
    (4) 登録官が，提出された書類が次のいずれかに該当すると考える場合は，登録官は，当該書類の受領又は登録を拒絶し，かつ，当該書類を適切に補正若しくは完成し，若しくは提出し直し，又は当該書類の代わりに新たな書類を提出するよう要請することができる。 (a) 法律に反する事項を含んでいること (b) 脱漏又は誤記のために，適正に完成されていないこと (c) 本法の要件を遵守していないこと，又は (d) 何らかの誤り，変更又は削除を含んでいること - 特許庁
  • (1) Within one month after the service of the counter statement, the opponent shall (a) submit to the Registrar, by way of affidavit or statutory declaration, or in accordance with section 54 of the Act, the evidence that the opponent is relying on to support the opposition, or a statement that the opponent does not wish to submit evidence; and (b) serve the applicant, where evidence is submitted, with a copy of the evidence or, where the opponent does not wish to submit evidence, with a copy of a statement that the opponent does not wish to submit evidence.
    (1) 答弁書の送達後1月以内に，異議申立人は， (a) 宣誓供述書若しくは法定宣言書により又は法律第54条に従って，登録官に対し，異議申立人が異議申立を支持するため依拠する証拠又は異議申立人が証拠の提出を希望しない旨の陳述書を提出し，かつ (b) 証拠を提出した場合はその証拠の写し，又は異議申立人が証拠の提出を希望しない場合は異議申立人が証拠の提出を希望しない旨の陳述書の写しを，出願人に送達しなければならない。 - 特許庁
  • (5) On request, as many annual fees shall be included in the legal aid as are necessary to avoid a limitation opposing a grant of legal aid under Section 115(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The installments paid shall be set off against the annual fees only when the costs of the patent-granting procedure, including costs possibly arising for an assigned representative, are covered by the payment of the installments. Where the annual fees can be considered as paid by the payment of the installments, Section 5(2) of the Patent Cost Act shall apply mutatis mutandis.
    (5) 請求があった場合は，法的扶助には，民事訴訟法第 115条(3)に基づく法的扶助の付与を妨げる制限を回避するために必要な数の年次手数料を含めることができる。支払われた割賦金は，割賦金の支払が，選任された代理人のために生ずることのある費用を含め，特許付与手続の費用を負担するに足りる場合にのみ，年次手数料に充当される。割賦金の支払によって，年次手数料が納付されたものとみなすことができる場合は，特許費用法第 5条(2)が準用される。 - 特許庁
  • (3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where an offence under this Act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with consent or connivance of, or that the commission of the offence is attributable to any neglect on the part of, any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, such director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.
    (3)本条第(1)項の規定にかかわらず、本法の違反が会社によって行われ、当該違反は同会社のいずれの取締役、管理者、秘書役又はその他の役員の同意を得て若しくは黙認により行われたこと、又は当該違反が行われたことは同会社の取締役、管理者、秘書役又はその他の役員の側における怠慢に起因していることが立証された場合、同会社のほか当該取締役、管理者、秘書役又はその他の役員のいずれも当該違反の責任を負うとみなされ、訴追され、しかるべく処罰される。 - 特許庁
  • When dealing with the Great East Japan Earthquake that occurred on March 11 last year, I decided to inject capital into 10 regional financial institutions based on special earthquake-related provisions of the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions from the perspective of strengthening the financial intermediary function of financial institutions in the disaster areas, and contributing to post-earthquake restoration and reconstruction, so as to ensure that the financial sector supports post-earthquake restoration and reconstruction work. I also did my utmost toward reconstruction by supporting the enforcement of the guideline for the restructuring of debts owed by individual debtors, which is aimed at smoothly restructuring debts owed by disaster victims.
    昨年3月11日に発生した東日本大震災の対応に当たっては、震災からの復旧・復興を金融がしっかりと下支えすべく、被災地の金融機関等の金融仲介機能を強化し、震災からの復旧・復興に資する観点から、金融機能強化法の震災特例に基づき、地域金融機関10機関に対する資本参加を決定したほか、被災者の債務整理を円滑に進めるための個人債務の私的整理に対するガイドラインの運用を支援するなど、復興支援に最大限努力をしてまいりました。 - 金融庁
  • If that happens, people who will suffer most will be the nearly 100,000 residents who cannot return to their homes due to radioactive contamination. In accordance with the principles of the Act on Contract for Indemnification of Nuclear Damage Compensation, Tokyo Electric Power should properly bear the burden, and to that end, it was necessary to keep the company operating as a free enterprise, a private company. That was the biggest reason.
    そうしますと、結局、実際一番困るのは、十数万人近い方が放射能の被害を受けておられて､今まで住んでおられたところに住んでおれないという、本当にお気の毒なことになっているわけですから、それに対して東京電力さんが、原賠法も原理原則がありますから、そこはやっぱりきちっと負担をしていただくということで、それで結局私はそういったことをするためにはやっぱりフリーエンタープライズ、民間企業として存続していただくことが必要だということだったということ思います、あのときの一番大きな理由はね。 - 金融庁
  • Many also voiced their wishes for measures that could increase jobs or sales and for the extension of the SME Financing Facilitation Act. The Financial Services Agency (FSA) is committed to working on the facilitation of financing for SMEs, etc. in the future, taking those inputs into account.
    また、仕事や売り上げを増加させる施策や中小企業の金融円滑化法の延長を望む声が多く聞かれました。金融庁といたしましては、これらの意見を踏まえつつ今後の中小企業等の金融の円滑化に取り組んでまいる所存でございます。また、郵政改革担当大臣でもございますから、昨日は仙台の郵便局を訪問いたしまして、現状の視察とともに色々な意見を聞かせて頂いたわけでございまして、仙台は宮城県でございますが、岩手県、福島県、山形県からも郵便局長の代表の方もおいでになりました。 - 金融庁
  • While we are not aware of such cases at the moment, generally speaking, whether a trust contract is signed or not should be decided through negotiations between the parties concerned. However, I believe it is desirable that trust companies act in light of the actual situation of customers and the contents of their trust contracts, rather than making judgment mechanically by paying attention only to formal factors related to their transactional relationship
    ご指摘のような事例を、現時点において我々として承知しているわけではありませんが、これも一般論として申し上げれば、信託契約を締結するかどうかは、それぞれの契約の当事者間でよく交渉し、決めていただくということだと思いますけれども、受託する信託会社においては、取引関係について何か形式的なファクターがあるからといって、そこだけに着目して機械的に判断するのではなくて、顧客の実態、あるいはその信託契約の中身に応じた対応を工夫していっていただくことが望ましいと思っております - 金融庁
  • (1) Where a patent has not been sealed by reason only that the prescribed request was not made within the time allowed for that purpose by or under section 27 of this Act, then if the Commissioner is satisfied, upon application made by the applicant for the patent, that the failure to make the request was unintentional and that no undue delay has occurred in making the application he may order the patent to be sealed notwithstanding that the prescribed request was not made as aforesaid.
    (1) 特許証が第27条の規定により又はそれに基づいて捺印の請求のために許される期間内に所定の前記請求がされなかったという理由のみにより捺印されなかった場合において，特許出願人から申請があり，かつ，所定の前記請求の不履行が故意によるものでなかったこと及びこの申請をするについて不当な遅滞がなかったことを局長が納得するときは，局長は，所定の前記請求が前記のとおりされなかったことに拘らず，その特許証に捺印することを命じることができる。 - 特許庁
  • If a body corporate is convicted of an offence against any of sections 120 to 124, every director and every person concerned in the management of the body corporate is guilty of the offence if it is proved that the act that constituted the offence took place with his or her authority, permission, or consent; and that he or she knew, or could reasonably be expected to have known, that the offence was to be or was being committed; and failed to take all reasonable steps to prevent or stop it.
    法人が第120条から第124条までの何れかに対して有罪の判決を受けた場合は，その法人のすべての役員及び経営に関与するすべての者は，次に掲げる事項が証明されたときは，有罪とする。罪を構成する行為が前記の者の委任，許可又は承諾を得て行われたこと，及び同人が，その罪が犯されることになるか又は犯されつつあることを知っていたか，又は知っていたと合理的に予想され，かつそれを防止又は阻止するためのすべての合理的措置を取ってはいなかったこと。 - 特許庁
  • The Commissioner may, at the written request of the person who has made an application (other than an application for the registration of a trade mark), or filed a notice or other document for the purposes of this Act, or, at the written request of the person's agent, amend the application, notice or document, to correct a clerical error or an obvious mistake; or if the Commissioner is of the opinion that it is fair and reasonable in all the circumstances of the case to do so.
    局長は，申請(商標登録出願を除く)をした者又は本法の適用に係る通知その他の書類を提出した者の書面による請求により，又は前記の者の代理人の書面による請求により，申請，通知又は書類を補正することができるが，ただし，次に掲げる条件に該当する場合に限る。その目的が誤記又は明白な過誤の訂正であること，又は局長の見解では，事件に係るすべての事情を考慮した場合，そうすることが公平かつ合理的であること - 特許庁
  • In this section, the expression "date of an application for a patent" means, as respects an application which is post-dated or ante-dated under this Act, the date to which the application is so post-dated or ante-dated, and means, as respects any other application, the date on which it is actually made.
    発明は、特許出願の日から、出願された特許を付与する公印が付される日までの期間にわたり、その特許を毀損することなく使用し公開することができ、使用及び公開によって生ずる結果から保護することを、本法では暫定保護という。本条において特許出願の日という表現は、本法に基づき実際より後の又は先の日付が記入された出願については、当該出願がそのように実際より後の又は先の日付で記入された日をいい、その他の出願については、実際に出願が行われた日をいう。 - 特許庁
  • Where a representation is made to the Government by or on behalf of any trade or industry that in the interests of the trade or industry it is expedient to dispense with or modify as regards any class or description of articles any of the requirements of this section as to marking, the Government may, if it thinks fit, by rule under this Act, dispense with or modify such requirements as regards any such class or description of articles to such extent and subject to such conditions as it thinks fit.
    顧客若しくは業界により又は顧客若しくは業界に代わって、物品に係る何らかの区分若しくは品目につき、標示につき本条が定めるいずれかの要件を免除し若しくは修正することが顧客若しくは業界の利益に適う旨の表明が政府になされた場合、政府は、適切と考える場合、本法に基づく規則により、物品に係る区分又は品目に関し、適切と考える範囲において適切と考える条件を付して、当該要件を免除又は修正することができる。 - 特許庁
  • Without prejudice to the generality, such rules may make provision as to the manner of filing applications and other documents; requiring and regulating the translation of documents and the filing and authentication of any translation; as to the service of documents; authorizing the rectification of irregularities of procedure; prescribing time limits for anything required to be done in connection with any proceeding under this Act; for the extension of any time limit so prescribed, or specified by the Registrar, whether or not it has already expired.
    一般原則を害することなく，当該規則は次のことについて規定を制定することができる。申請及びその他の書類を提出する方式について，書類の翻訳並びに翻訳文の提出及び認証を要求する及び規定すること，書類の通知について，手続の不備の修正を許可すること，本法に基づく手続に関して求められている行為の期限を規定すること。既に期限が満了であるか否かを問わず，かく定められた又は登録官が指定した期限の延長について。 - 特許庁
  • (3) Where a request under sections 29(7) and 30(1)(a) to extend a prescribed period under section 29(2)(b), (c)(i), (d)(i) or (e)(i) or (4) and the corresponding prescribed period under section 30(1)(a) is filed in accordance with rule 47A(1), the period prescribed for filing a request for a search and examination report under section 29(2)(b) or a request for an examination report under section 29(2)(c)(i), (d)(i) or (e)(i) or (4) shall be the prescribed extended period under section 29(7) for performing that act.
    (3) 第29条(2)(b)，(c)(i)，(d)(i)若しくは(e)(i)又は(4)に基づく所定の期間及び第30条(1)(a)に基づく対応する所定の期間の延長を求める第29条(7)及び第30条(1)に基づく請求が規則47A(1)に従って提出された場合は，第29条(2)(b)に基づく調査及び審査報告を求める請求又は第29条(2)(c)(i)，(d)(i)若しくは(e)(i)若しくは(4)に基づく審査報告を求める請求の提出についての所定の期間は，当該行為を行うための第29条(7)に基づく所定の延長された期間とする。 - 特許庁
  • (1) Subject to rule 96A(2), any notice, application or other document authorised or required by the Act or these Rules to be filed or sent to the Registry may be sent through the post, and the service and filing shall be deemed to be effected by properly addressing, prepaying and posting a letter containing the document, and unless the contrary is proved, shall be deemed to have been effected at the time at which the letter would be delivered in the ordinary course of post.
    (1) 規則96A(2)に従うことを条件として，法又は本規則により登録局に提出又は送付することが認められ又は求められる通知，申請，請求その他の書類は，郵便により送付することができるものとし，その送達及び提出は，当該書類を含む書簡に適正に宛名を書き，手数料を前納し，かつ，これを投函することにより実行されたものとみなされるとともに，別段の立証がされない限り，当該書簡が通常の郵送過程において配達される筈の時に実行されたものとみなされる。 - 特許庁
  • Where an application for a patent is filed in the Registry (whether under this Act or any treaty or international convention to which Singapore is a party) and it appears to the Registrar that the application contains information of a description notified to him by the Minister as being information the publication of which might be prejudicial to the defence of Singapore, the Registrar shall give directions prohibiting or restricting the publication of that information or its communication to any specified person or description of persons.
    シンガポールの防衛又は公衆の安全に不利益な情報(1)特許出願が登録局に出願され(本法に基づくか，又はシンガポールが締約国である条約に基づくかを問わない)，かつ，当該出願に，公表されたならばシンガポールの防衛上不利益となる虞があるとして大臣による登録官への通知があったものに該当する情報が含まれていることを登録官が認める場合は，登録官は，当該情報の公表又は特定の者若しくは特定の種類の者への伝達を禁止するか又は制限する指示を与えなければならない。 - 特許庁
  • (3) An appeal shall not lie to the Court of Appeal from a decision of the court on appeal from a decision of the Registrar under this Act or the rules -- (a) except where the decision of the Registrar was given under section 20, 38, 47, 67, 80, 81 or 83; or (b) except where the ground of appeal is that the decision of the court is wrong in law, but an appeal shall only lie to the Court of Appeal under this section if leave to appeal is given by the court or the Court of Appeal.
    (3) 本法又は規則に基づく登録官の決定に対する上訴に関する裁判所の決定に対する控訴は， (a) 登録官の決定が第20条，第38条，第47条，第67条，第80条，第81条又は第83条に基づいてなされた場合を除き，又は (b) 控訴の理由として裁判所の決定は法律上の誤りがあるとする場合を除き， 控訴院に提起することができないが，控訴の許可を裁判所又は控訴院が与えた場合に限り，本条に基づいて控訴院に提起することができる。 - 特許庁
  • For the purposes of this Act: (a) ‘Application for the international registration of an appellation of origin’ (hereinafter referred to as “international application”) means an application filed under the Lisbon Agreement of October 31, 1958 for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration (for the purposes of this part hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”); (b) ‘International Bureau’ means the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization; (c) ‘international register’ means the register maintained by the International Bureau, of appellations of origin filed under the Agreement; (d) ‘Office of the country of origin’ means the competent Office of the country of origin defined in Article 2(2) of the Agreement.
    本法の適用上，次のとおりとする。 (a) 「原産地名称の国際登録に係る出願」(以下「国際出願」という)とは，原産地名称の保護及び国際登録に関する1958年10月31日のリスボン協定(この部の適用上，以下「協定」という)に基づいてなされた出願をいう。 (b) 「国際事務局」とは，世界知的所有権機関の国際事務局をいう。 (c) 「国際登録簿」とは，国際事務局が維持する，協定に基づいて提出された原産地名称の登録簿をいう。 (d) 「本国官庁」とは，協定第2条(2)に定める本国の管轄官庁をいう。 - 特許庁
  • Where a representation is made to the Central Government by or on behalf of any trade or industry that in the interest of the trade or industry it is expedient to dispense with or modify as regards any class or description of articles any of the requirements of this section as to marking, the Central Government may, if it thinks fit, by rule under this Act, dispense with or modify such requirements as regards any such class or description of articles to such extent and subject to such conditions as it thinks fit.
    業界又は産業の利益のために，何らかの区分又は種類の物品について，標章に関する本条の何れかの要件を免除又は修正することが便宜である旨の陳情が，業界又は産業の立場から中央政府に対してされる場合において，中央政府は，適当と認めるときは，本法に基づく規則により，適当と認める範囲で，かつ，適当と認める条件を付して，当該区分又は種類の物品について，当該要件を免除又は修正することができる。 - 特許庁
  • An application that has been rejected by an examiner shall not be amended after the expiry of the time for responding to the examiner’s requisition, made pursuant to subsection 30(4), except (a) where the rejection is withdrawn in accordance with subsection 30(5); (b) where the Commissioner is satisfied after review that the rejection is not justified and the applicant has been so informed; (c) where the Commissioner has informed the applicant that the amendment is necessary for compliance with the Act and these Rules; or (d) by order of the Federal Court or the Supreme Court of Canada.
    審査官によって拒絶された出願は，第30条(4)に従ってされた審査官の要求に対する応答期間の満了後は，次の場合を除き，補正することができない: (a) 第30条(5)に従って拒絶が取り下げられた場合 (b) 長官が再審理後，拒絶を不適法であると認め，かつ，その旨を出願人に通知した場合 (c) 長官が法律及び本規則を遵守するために補正が必要である旨を出願人に通知した場合，又は (d) 連邦裁判所又はカナダ最高裁判所の命令による場合 - 特許庁
  • The applicant may, before the application is open to public inspection under section 10 of the Act or on or before January 1, 1998, whichever is the later, file a notice with the Commissioner stating the applicant’s wish that, until either a patent has issued on the basis of the application or the application is refused, or is abandoned and no longer subject to reinstatement, or is withdrawn, the Commissioner only authorize the furnishing of a sample of the deposited biological material to an independent expert nominated by the Commissioner in accordance with section
    法律第10条に基づいて当該出願が公衆の閲覧に供される前又は1998年1月1日以前のうち何れか後の日までに，出願人は，当該出願を基礎として特許が発行され，又は当該出願が拒絶され，放棄されて回復の可能性がなくなり，若しくは取り下げられるまでは，長官が寄託された生物材料の試料を第165条に従って長官により指定された独立専門家に分譲することのみを認めるよう希望する旨を陳述する申立書を長官に提出することができる。 - 特許庁
  • In considering the amount of any compensation for Government use of an invention after publication of an application for a standard patent for the invention and before such a patent is granted, the court shall consider whether or not it would have been reasonable to expect, from a consideration of the application as published that a patent would be granted conferring on the proprietor of the patent protection for an act of the same description as that found to constitute that use, and if the court finds that it would not have been reasonable, it shall reduce the compensation to such amount as it thinks just.
    発明の標準特許出願の公開後であって当該特許の付与前における発明の政府使用の補償額を検討するに際し，裁判所は，公開された出願についての検討の結果，特許所有者に対して当該実施を構成すると判明したものと同一種類の行為に関して保護を与える特許付与を期待することが適当であったか否かを考慮し，それが適当でなかったと裁判所が判断する場合は，裁判所は，適切と考える金額に補償を減額する。 - 特許庁
＜前へ 1 2 .... 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 .... 472 473 次へ＞

例文データの著作権について