「Insurance」を含む例文一覧(7739)

＜前へ 1 2 .... 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 次へ＞
  • Still, this will be rather troublesome if not thought out carefully. While it is already quite difficult to forecast outcomes even in the case of domestic investment, widening the scope overseas would come with concerns about exchange fluctuations and would lead to a variety of other issues. That said, I still agree in general with what Minister Haraguchi is saying. I agree because it will be great if the money of Japan Post Bank or Japan Post Insurance, which is collected within Japan, can be managed well so that it can contribute to the well-being of people all around the world, rather than to the pursuit of the well-being of us Japanese alone. I hope that Japan's postal services will grow fast to develop such capacity.
    しかし、これもやり方を考えないとなかなか大変ですよね。国内投資だってなかなか見通せないところを「外国まで」ということになってくると、為替変動の問題だってありますし、いろいろな問題が出てくるのですよね。そういう中で、しかし、私は、原口（総務）大臣の言っていることは賛成ですよ。我々、日本人だけが幸せになれれば良いというのではなくて、世界中の人たちが幸せになっていくために、国内で集めたゆうちょ（銀行）のお金なり、かんぽ（生命保険）のそういうものがうまく運用されていくのであれば、これは良い話ですから。私は、そういうことをやれるような日本郵政に早く成長してもらいたいと思います。なかなか大変だろうと思います。 - 金融庁
  • I appreciate the awareness that Hokenmainichi always has of this matter – well, I understand that the proposed amendment to the Act is to be continued to the next session for deliberation. The amendment involves establishing, from the standpoint of policyholder protection, certain regulations applicable to those corporations already engaged in a mutual aid business prior to the 2005 amendment to the Insurance Business Act that meet certain requirements, in order for them to maintain their mutual aid business, at the same time to ensure that proper operation in their activities. As your question implies, public interest corporations have thus far been supervised by their respective competent government agencies, which accordingly have knowledge of their operations and a set of information accumulated through the work of supervision in the past.
    保険毎日さんには、いつもこのことに大変、問題意識を持っていただいて、今のご質問でございますけれども、今回の法律の改正は、ご存じのように継続審議になったと認識いたしておりますけれども、平成17年の保険業法改正前から共済事業を行ってきた団体のうち、一定の要件に該当するものについて、契約者保護の観点から一定の規制を設けることにより、共済事業の持続を可能にしつつ、業務の適正な運営を確保しようとするものでございまして、今、ご質問がございましたように、公益法人については各主務官庁でこれまで監督を行ってきており、その業務に関する知見や、これまでの監督を通じての蓄積された情報を有しております。 - 金融庁
  • (2) The provisions of Article 306, paragraphs (3) to (7) inclusive (Election of Inspector on Calling Procedures of Shareholders Meeting) and Article 307 (Determination by The Court of the Calling of Shareholders Meeting) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "preceding two paragraphs" in Article 306, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 40, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Stock Company" in Article 306, paragraphs (4) and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 307 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members"; and the term "shareholders" in Article 307, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    ２　会社法第三百六条第三項から第七項まで（株主総会の招集手続等に関する検査役の選任）及び第三百七条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）の規定は、前項の場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百六条第三項中「前二項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十条第一項」と、同条第四項及び第七項中「株式会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、同法第三百七条中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 183 (1) The provisions of Article 507 (Conclusion of Liquidation), Article 508 (Retention of Accounting Materials), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, the term "the items of Article 489, paragraph (7)" in Article 508, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 180-14, paragraph (7), item (i) or (ii) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第百八十三条　会社法第五百七条（清算事務の終了等）、第五百八条（帳簿資料の保存）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、清算相互会社について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百八条第一項中「第四百八十九条第七項各号」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十四第七項各号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 240-6 (1) Resolutions set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article of an Insurance Company that is a Stock Company, or resolutions listed in Article 309, paragraph (2), item (iv), (v), (ix), (xi), or (xii) of the Companies Act (Resolution of Shareholders Meetings), or listed in Article 324, paragraph (2), item (i) or (iv) of that Act (Resolution of Class Meetings), or resolutions pursuant to the provisions of Article 69, paragraph (2), Article 136, paragraph (2), Article 144, paragraph (3), Article 165-3, paragraph (2), or Article 165-10, paragraph (2) of that Act that are to be decided together with said resolutions, may be made provisionally by two-thirds or more of the votes held by the shareholders present, notwithstanding these provisions.
    第二百四十条の六　株式会社である保険会社における前条第一項の決議又はこれとともにする会社法第三百九条第二項第四号、第五号、第九号、第十一号若しくは第十二号（株主総会の決議）若しくは第三百二十四条第二項第一号若しくは第四号（種類株主総会の決議）に掲げる株主総会若しくは種類株主総会の決議若しくは第六十九条第二項、第百三十六条第二項、第百四十四条第三項、第百六十五条の三第二項若しくは第百六十五条の十第二項の規定による決議は、これらの規定にかかわらず、出席した株主の議決権の三分の二以上に当たる多数をもって、仮にすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) The Insurance Company, etc., set forth in paragraph (1) shall, on the date of mailing convocation notices for the Shareholders Meeting, etc., at which a resolution will be made on the approval set forth in Article 783, paragraph (1) (Approval, etc., of Absorption-Type Merger Agreements, etc.), Article 795, paragraph (1) (Approval, etc., of Absorption-Type Merger Agreements, etc.), or Article 804, paragraph (1) (Approval of Consolidation-Type Merger Agreements, etc.) of the Companies Act, or Article 165-3, paragraph (1), Article 165-10, paragraph (1), or Article 165-16, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-20), make public notice to the effect that said Shareholders Meeting, etc., will be held and that a resolution on the approval of a merger agreement is the purpose of the meeting.
    ３　第一項の保険会社等は、会社法第七百八十三条第一項（吸収合併契約等の承認等）、第七百九十五条第一項（吸収合併契約等の承認等）若しくは第八百四条第一項（新設合併契約等の承認）又は第百六十五条の三第一項、第百六十五条の十第一項若しくは第百六十五条の十六第一項（第百六十五条の二十において準用する場合を含む。）の承認の決議を行う株主総会等の招集の通知の発送日において、当該株主総会等が開かれる旨及び当該契約条件の変更を含む合併契約の承認の決議が会議の目的となっている旨を公告しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 1-3 (1) Notwithstanding the provision of Article 270-3, paragraph (2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 270-3-2, paragraph (8)), the amount of the Financial Assistance provided by the Corporation under Article 266, paragraph (1) or Article 267, paragraph (3) for the applications received by 31 March 2001 under Article 266, paragraph (1) or Article 267, paragraph (3) (limited to the donation of money; hereinafter referred to as "Financial Assistance in the Special Provision Period") shall be, for each of the Bankrupt Insurance Companies covered by the Financial Assistance in the Special Provision Period, the amount obtained by adding the amounts listed in items (iii) and (iv) to the difference calculated by subtracting the amount listed in item (ii) from the amount listed in item (i):
    第一条の三　機構が平成十三年三月三十一日までに受けた第二百六十六条第一項又は第二百六十七条第三項の規定による申込みについて行う第二百六十六条第一項又は第二百六十七条第三項に規定する資金援助（金銭の贈与に限る。以下「特例期間資金援助」という。）の額は、第二百七十条の三第二項（第二百七十条の三の二第八項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定にかかわらず、当該特例期間資金援助に係る破綻保険会社につき、第一号に掲げる額から第二号に掲げる額を控除した残額に第三号及び第四号に掲げる額を加算して得られた額に相当する金額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) With regard to a Company (including a Company that obtained certification for its articles of incorporation prior to the Partial Enforcement Date but is established subsequent to the Partial Enforcement Date (hereinafter referred to as "Company in the Course of Incorporation" in this paragraph)) whose articles of incorporation include a provision pertaining to the Closure Period as at the Partial Enforcement Date but do not include any provision pertaining to the certain date set forth in Article 11, paragraph (2) of the Former Insurance Business Act, a resolution for an amendment in the articles of incorporation shall be deemed to be adopted as at the Partial Enforcement Date (or, for a Company in the Course of Incorporation, the date of its establishment) to designate the first day of the Closure Period as the certain date set forth in that paragraph, in order to specify the persons to exercise rights as shareholders or pledgees. In this case, a resolution of the board of directors shall determine the content of such rights.
    ２　一部施行日において閉鎖期間に係る定款の定めがある会社（一部施行日前に定款の認証を受け、一部施行日後に成立するもの（以下この項において「設立中の会社」という。）を含む。）であって旧保険業法第十一条第二項の一定の日に係る定款の定めがないものについては、一部施行日（設立中の会社にあっては、その成立の日）において、株主又は質権者として権利を行使すべき者を定めるため、当該閉鎖期間の初日を同項の一定の日に指定する旨の定款の変更の決議があったものとみなす。この場合においては、取締役会の決議をもって、当該権利の内容を定めなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 20 A Long-Term Care Benefit or Prevention Benefit (herein referred to as "Long-Term Care Benefit, etc.") with regard to said Condition of Need for Long-Term Care or Needed Support Condition (herein referred to as "Condition of Need for Long-Term Care, etc.") shall not be provided within the limit provided by a Cabinet Order when a benefit equivalent to a Long-Term Care Benefit, etc., can be received from among benefits that is a medical compensation benefit pursuant to the provisions of the Worker Accident Compensation Insurance Act (Act No. 50 of 1947), a medical benefit, or other benefits based on laws and regulations and provided by a Cabinet Order, or within said limit when benefits other than those provided by said a Cabinet Order and those benefits equivalent to a Long-Term Care Benefit, etc., are granted under the covered expenses of a plan of the national government or a local government.
    第二十条　介護給付又は予防給付（以下「介護給付等」という。）は、当該要介護状態又は要支援状態（以下「要介護状態等」という。）につき、労働者災害補償保険法（昭和二十二年法律第五十号）の規定による療養補償給付若しくは療養給付その他の法令に基づく給付であって政令で定めるもののうち介護給付等に相当するものを受けることができるときは政令で定める限度において、又は当該政令で定める給付以外の給付であって国若しくは地方公共団体の負担において介護給付等に相当するものが行われたときはその限度において、行わない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) The amount of allowance for Long-Term Care Facility Service shall be 90 percent of the amount of expenses calculated by type of Facility Service with standards as prescribed by the Minister of Health, Labour, and Welfare after considering the average expenses (excluding the expenses necessary to provide meals, residence, and other necessary expenses for daily life as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare; the same shall apply hereinafter in this Article) necessary for the Designated Facility Service, etc., that are calculated by considering the categories of Condition of Need for Long-Term Care, the area where the Facility Covered by Long-Term Care Insurance that provides the Designated Facility Service, etc., pertaining to the type of said Facility Service is located, etc. (in a case when said calculated amount exceeds the actual expenses necessary for the Designated Facility Service, etc., the amount of Allowance for Long-Term Care Facility Service shall be the actual expenses necessary for said Designated Facility Service, etc.).
    ２　施設介護サービス費の額は、施設サービスの種類ごとに、要介護状態区分、当該施設サービスの種類に係る指定施設サービス等を行う介護保険施設の所在する地域等を勘案して算定される当該指定施設サービス等に要する平均的な費用（食事の提供に要する費用、居住に要する費用その他の日常生活に要する費用として厚生労働省令で定める費用を除く。）の額を勘案して厚生労働大臣が定める基準により算定した費用の額（その額が現に当該指定施設サービス等に要した費用の額を超えるときは、当該現に指定施設サービス等に要した費用の額とする。）の百分の九十に相当する額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (6) A Municipality, when a Facility Covered by Long-Term Care Insurance requests an Allowance for Long-Term Care Facility Service, shall pay said allowance after conducting an examination according to the standards determined by the Minister of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in paragraph (2), the standards concerning facilities and management of a Designated Facility Covered by Public Aid Providing Long-Term Care to the Elderly as prescribed in Article 88, paragraph (2) (limited to the part concerning the handling of Designated Facility Service for Long-Term Care Covered by Public Aid), the standards concerning facilities and management of a Long-Term Care Health Facility as prescribed in Article 97, paragraph (3) (limited to the part concerning the handling of a Long-Term Care Health Facility Service), and standards concerning facilities and management of a Designated Medical Long-Term Care Sanatorium as prescribed in Article 110, paragraph (2) (limited to the part concerning the handling of a Designated Sanatorium Service for Long-Term Care).
    ６　市町村は、介護保険施設から施設介護サービス費の請求があったときは、第二項の厚生労働大臣が定める基準及び第八十八条第二項に規定する指定介護老人福祉施設の設備及び運営に関する基準（指定介護福祉施設サービスの取扱いに関する部分に限る。）、第九十七条第三項に規定する介護老人保健施設の設備及び運営に関する基準（介護保健施設サービスの取扱いに関する部分に限る。）又は第百十条第二項に規定する指定介護療養型医療施設の設備及び運営に関する基準（指定介護療養施設サービスの取扱いに関する部分に限る。）に照らして審査した上、支払うものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 115-11 (1) An appointment as service provider as set forth in the main clause of Article 54-2, paragraph (1) shall be provided, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, by application of a person that performs a Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care Business, for each type of Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care Service and Business Office that performs a Community-Based Service of Preventive Long-Term Care Business pertaining to the type of said Community-Based Preventive Long-Term Care Service (hereinafter referred to as "Business Office" in this Section), and shall have effect with regard to payment of an allowance for Community-Based Preventive Long-Term Care Service and an exceptional allowance for Community-Based Service of Preventive Long-Term Care Service to an Insured Person by Long-Term Care Insurance provided by a Municipality, for which the mayor of the Municipality that provides said appointment as service provider, is chairperson.
    第百十五条の十一　第五十四条の二第一項本文の指定は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、地域密着型介護予防サービス事業を行う者の申請により、地域密着型介護予防サービスの種類及び当該地域密着型介護予防サービスの種類に係る地域密着型介護予防サービス事業を行う事業所（以下この節において「事業所」という。）ごとに行い、当該指定をする市町村長がその長である市町村の行う介護保険の被保険者に対する地域密着型介護予防サービス費及び特例地域密着型介護予防サービス費の支給について、その効力を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 134 (1) A Pension Insurer, by the due date as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare every year, shall provide notice of the name, domicile and other matters, as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, of a person that has received an Old Age, etc., Pension Benefit from said Pension Insurer as of April 1 of said year and is the age of 65 years or older (except for those persons listed in the following) to the Municipality where said person is domiciled as of the same date (in a case when said person is a Primary Insured Person of Long-Term Care Insurance provided by another Municipality pursuant to the provisions of Article 13, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2), notification of said fact shall be provided to said other Municipality; the same shall apply from the following item to item (vi) (except for item (iii)):
    第百三十四条　年金保険者は、毎年厚生労働省令で定める期日までに、当該年の四月一日現在において当該年金保険者から老齢等年金給付の支払を受けている者であって六十五歳以上のもの（次に掲げるものを除く。）の氏名、住所その他厚生労働省令で定める事項を、その者が同日現在において住所を有する市町村（第十三条第一項又は第二項の規定によりその者が他の市町村が行う介護保険の第一号被保険者であるときは、当該他の市町村とする。次項（第三号を除く。）から第六項までにおいて同じ。）に通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (6) In a case when a Specified Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of Article 129, paragraph (2), and provisions of paragraph (3) of the same Article, applies a rate of insurance premium provided by said ordinance, the phrase "approximate amount of the disbursements necessary for repayment" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "approximate amount of the disbursements necessary for repayment, the prospective amount of disbursements imposed by said Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project as prescribed in Article 148, paragraph (1)," and the phrase "approximated through three years in consideration of..., and the amount of national treasury impositions, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "approximated during the Project Implementation Period as prescribed in Article 148, paragraph (2) in consideration of..., and the amount of national treasury impositions, etc., and prospective amount, etc., granted by said Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project as prescribed in the same paragraph."
    ６　特定市町村が第百二十九条第二項の規定によりその条例で定める保険料率について同条第三項の規定を適用する場合においては、同項中「償還に要する費用の予定額」とあるのは「償還に要する費用の予定額、第百四十八条第一項に規定する市町村相互財政安定化事業により負担する額の予想額」と、「並びに国庫負担等の額等に照らし、おおむね三年」とあるのは「、国庫負担等の額並びに同項に規定する市町村相互財政安定化事業により交付される額の予想額等に照らし、おおむね第百四十八条第二項に規定する事業実施期間」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (4) From among the persons who held positions as employees of the existing Institute on the day before the enforcement date, and who continued on to become employees of the Institute pursuant to the provisions of Article 2 of the supplementary provisions, any person who retired from the Institute between the enforcement date and when he/she became qualified to receive unemployment, etc. benefits pursuant to the Employment Insurance Act (Act No. 116 of 1974) and who may receive a retirement allowance pursuant to the provisions of Article 10 of the National Government Employees, etc. Retirement Allowance Act if he/she held a position as an employee of the existing Institute up until the day of his/her retirement, the Institute shall pay an amount equivalent to the retirement allowance calculated based on the example in the provisions of said Article to said person as a retirement allowance.
    ４　研究所は、施行日の前日に従前の研究所の職員として在職し、附則第二条の規定により引き続いて研究所の職員となった者のうち施行日から雇用保険法（昭和四十九年法律第百十六号）による失業等給付の受給資格を取得するまでの間に研究所を退職したものであって、その退職した日まで従前の研究所の職員として在職したものとしたならば国家公務員退職手当法第十条の規定による退職手当の支給を受けることができるものに対しては、同条の規定の例により算定した退職手当の額に相当する額を退職手当として支給するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (a) Where, with regard to the amount of the rehabilitation debtor's salary or similar regular income, reemployment or any other event that should cause a fluctuation amounting to not less than one-fifth of his/her annual income has occurred at a certain time within two years prior to the submission of the proposed rehabilitation plan: The amount obtained by deducting, from the total income earned during the period from when such event occurred until the proposed rehabilitation plan was submitted, the amount of income tax, prefectural inhabitants tax or Tokyo inhabitants tax on individuals, and municipal inhabitants tax or special ward inhabitants tax on individuals as well as social insurance premiums prescribed in Article 74(2) of the Income Tax Act (Act No. 33 of 1965) (referred to as "income tax, etc." in (b) and (c)) imposed on such total amount, as converted into the amount per year
    イ　再生債務者の給与又はこれに類する定期的な収入の額について、再生計画案の提出前二年間の途中で再就職その他の年収について五分の一以上の変動を生ずべき事由が生じた場合　当該事由が生じた時から再生計画案を提出した時までの間の収入の合計額からこれに対する所得税、個人の道府県民税又は都民税及び個人の市町村民税又は特別区民税並びに所得税法（昭和四十年法律第三十三号）第七十四条第二項に規定する社会保険料（ロ及びハにおいて「所得税等」という。）に相当する額を控除した額を一年間当たりの額に換算した額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (i) medical practice prescribed in Article 17 of the Medical Practitioners Act (Act No. 201 of 1948) (limited to medical practice conducted at hospitals prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 1-5 of the Medical Treatment Act (Act No. 205 of 1948) or clinics prescribed in paragraph (2) of the same Article (excluding those specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; hereinafter referred to as "Hospitals, etc." in this Article), birth centers prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 2 of the same Act (hereinafter referred to as "Birth Centers" in this Article), geriatric health care institutions prescribed in paragraph (25) of Article 8 of the Care Service Insurance Act (Act No. 123 of 1997) (hereinafter referred to as "Geriatric Health Care Institutions" in this Article), or homes of persons who receive medical care (hereinafter referred to as "Homes" in this Article));
    一　医師法（昭和二十三年法律第二百一号）第十七条に規定する医業（医療法（昭和二十三年法律第二百五号）第一条の五第一項に規定する病院若しくは同条第二項に規定する診療所（厚生労働省令で定めるものを除く。以下この条において「病院等」という。）、同法第二条第一項に規定する助産所（以下この条において「助産所」という。）、介護保険法（平成九年法律第百二十三号）第八条第二十五項に規定する介護老人保健施設（以下この条において「介護老人保健施設」という。）又は医療を受ける者の居宅（以下この条において「居宅」という。）において行われるものに限る。） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (6) Whether the department in charge of the overall operations (receiving orders, transactions and transfers) of a registered financial institution that conducts transactions of short-term securities is prepared to take all possible measures to block off the inflow/outflow of so-called subtle information between loan business, etc., and business related to the issuance of and transactions involving commercial papers and short-term corporate bonds, etc. (short-term corporate bonds prescribed in the Act on Transfer of Bonds, etc., short-term corporate bonds prescribed in the Insurance Business Act, specified short-term corporate bonds prescribed in the Act on Securitization of Assets, short-term commercial and industrial bonds prescribed in the Shoko Chukin Bank Act, short-term bonds prescribed in the Shinkin Bank Act, and short-term Norin-chukin Bank bonds prescribed in the Norin-chukin Bank Act).
    （６）短期有価証券の売買等の業務を行う登録金融機関にあっては、当該業務全般（受注、売買及び受渡し）を担当する部門については、コマーシャル・ペーパー及び短期社債等（社債等の振替に関する法律に規定する短期社債、保険業法に規定する短期社債、資産の流動化に関する法律に規定する特定短期社債、商工組合中央金庫法に規定する短期商工債、信用金庫法に規定する短期債及び農林中央金庫法に規定する短期農林債をいう。）の発行及び売買に関連する業務と融資業務等との間でのいわゆる機微情報の流出入の遮断等に十全を期することとなっているか。 - 金融庁
  • Article 72 In the case where a person with the right of receiving the special survivor pension does not report, or does not submit a document or any other property, or does not appear without any justifiable reason when he/she is requested to do so pursuant to the provision of Article 70, or falsely reports or submits a document with false description, or does not obey the order pursuant to the provision of the preceding article without justifiable reason, or does not give notice pursuant to the provision of Article 12-7 of the Worker's Accident Insurance Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Paragraph 1, Article 64, or does not submit a document or any other property without any justifiable reason when he/she is requested to do so, the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare may temporarily prohibit the payment of the special survivor pension to him/her.
    第七十二条　厚生労働大臣は、特別遺族年金を受ける権利を有する者が、第七十条の規定により報告、文書その他の物件の提出若しくは出頭を求められて、正当な理由がなくこれに従わず、若しくは虚偽の報告をし、若しくは虚偽の記載をした文書を提出し、正当な理由がなく前条の規定による命令に従わず、又は第六十四条第一項において準用する労災保険法第十二条の七の規定による届出をせず、若しくは書類その他の物件の提出を求められて、正当な理由がなくこれに従わないときは、その者に対する特別遺族年金の支給を一時差し止めることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) When a worker who receives temporary absence from work compensation benefits is, on the same grounds, eligible to receive either a disability employee's pension under the provisions of the Employee's Pension Insurance Act (Act No. 115 of 1954) or a disability basic pension under the provisions of the National Pension Act (Act No. 141 of 1959), the amount of the temporary absence from work compensation benefits payable to said worker shall, notwithstanding the provision of the preceding paragraph, be the amount obtained by multiplying the amount set forth in said paragraph, in accordance with the provisions of items (i) to (iii) of Table 1, by the rate for injury and disease compensation pension amongst the rates specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in items (i) to (iii) of said table (in cases where such amount is less than the amount specified by a Cabinet Order, said amount specified by a Cabinet Order).
    ２　休業補償給付を受ける労働者が同一の事由について厚生年金保険法（昭和二十九年法律第百十五号）の規定による障害厚生年金又は国民年金法（昭和三十四年法律第百四十一号）の規定による障害基礎年金を受けることができるときは、当該労働者に支給する休業補償給付の額は、前項の規定にかかわらず、同項の額に別表第一第一号から第三号までに規定する場合に応じ、それぞれ同表第一号から第三号までの政令で定める率のうち傷病補償年金について定める率を乗じて得た額（その額が政令で定める額を下回る場合には、当該政令で定める額）とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (iii) A person who has violated this Act or the provisions of Articles 197 to 198 inclusive of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act or who has committed a crime set forth in Article 233(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)) of the Act on Securities Investment Trust and Securities Investment Corporations, a crime set forth in Article 328(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)) of the Insurance Business Act, a crime set forth in Article 308(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)) of the Act on Securitization of Assets or a crime set forth in Article 967(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)) of the Companies Act, who has been sentenced to imprisonment without work or a severer punishment and for whom five years have yet to elapse from the time when the execution of the sentence has been completed or the sentence has ceased to be executed
    三　この法律若しくは金融商品取引法第百九十七条から第百九十八条までの規定に違反し、又は投資信託及び投資法人に関する法律第二百三十三条第一項（第三号に係る部分に限る。）の罪、保険業法第三百二十八条第一項（第三号に係る部分に限る。）の罪、資産の流動化に関する法律第三百八条第一項（第三号に係る部分に限る。）の罪若しくは会社法第九百六十七条第一項（第三号に係る部分に限る。）の罪を犯し、禁錮以上の刑に処せられた者であつて、その執行を終わり、又は執行を受けることがなくなつてから五年を経過しないもの - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 114-7 When a mutual aid agent has failed to submit a report or material under the provisions of Article 305 of the Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 9-7-5, paragraph (2) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 9-9, paragraph (5) or paragraph (8)) or has submitted a false report or material, or has refused to respond to the questioning or has given a false answer to the questioning, or has refused, obstructed, or avoided an inspection under the provisions of the same Article, or has violated an order under the provisions of Article 306 or Article 307, paragraph (1) of the same Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 9-7-5, paragraph (2), the mutual aid agent shall be punished by a non-penal fine of not more than two hundred thousand yen.
    第百十四条の七　共済代理店が、第九条の七の五第二項（第九条の九第五項又は第八項において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する保険業法第三百五条の規定による報告若しくは資料の提出をせず、若しくは虚偽の報告若しくは資料の提出をし、若しくは質問に対して答弁をせず、若しくは虚偽の答弁をし、若しくは同条の規定による検査を拒み、妨げ、若しくは忌避し、又は第九条の七の五第二項において準用する同法第三百六条若しくは第三百七条第一項の規定による命令に違反したときは、二十万円以下の過料に処する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) In the case of having a person requiring public assistance admitted into a relief facility, a rehabilitation facility or any other appropriate facility, or entrusting such admission to any such facility, or entrusting nursing care to the home of a private individual, or in the case of providing long-term care assistance (limited to facility care services) to a person requiring public assistance by entrusting it to a long-term care welfare facility for the elderly (which means a long-term care welfare facility for the elderly prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (24) of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) pursuant to the provisions of Article 34-2(2), the person who should provide public assistance to said person while said admission or entrustment remains valid shall be decided based on the place of residence or the current location of said person prior to said admission or entrustment.
    ３　第三十条第一項ただし書の規定により被保護者を救護施設、更生施設若しくはその他の適当な施設に入所させ、若しくはこれらの施設に入所を委託し、若しくは私人の家庭に養護を委託した場合又は第三十四条の二第二項の規定により被保護者に対する介護扶助（施設介護に限る。）を介護老人福祉施設（介護保険法第八条第二十四項に規定する介護老人福祉施設をいう。以下同じ。）に委託して行う場合においては、当該入所又は委託の継続中、その者に対して保護を行うべき者は、その者に係る入所又は委託前の居住地又は現在地によつて定めるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 1 This Act shall come into force as from October 1, 1989; provided, however, that the revised provision of the table of contents of the Employment Insurance Act (limited to the portion replacing the term "Article 61-2" with "Article 62"), the revised provisions of Article 1, Article 3 and Article 61-2, paragraph (1) of the same Act, the revised provision deleting Article 62 of the same Act and replacing Article 61-2 of the same Act with Article 62 of the same Act, the revised provisions of Article 65, Article 66, paragraph (3), item (iii) and paragraph (5), item (i)(b) of the same Act and the revised provision of Article 68, paragraph (2) in Article 1, and the provision of Article 2 and the provisions of Article 3, Article 4, Articles 7 to 12 inclusive of the Supplementary Provisions shall come into force as from the day of promulgation.
    第一条　この法律は、平成元年十月一日から施行する。ただし、第一条中雇用保険法の目次の改正規定（「第六十一条の二」を「第六十二条」に改める部分に限る。）、同法第一条、第三条及び第六十一条の二第一項の改正規定、同法第六十二条を削り、同法第六十一条の二を同法第六十二条とする改正規定、同法第六十五条、第六十六条第三項第三号及び第五項第一号ロ並びに第六十八条第二項の改正規定、第二条の規定並びに附則第三条、第四条及び第七条から第十二条までの規定は、公布の日から施行する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Where (i) a Contracting State (including, for this purpose in the case of Japan, the Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan) provides, pursuant to the laws concerning failure resolution involving imminent insolvency of financial institutions of that Contracting State, substantial financial assistance to a financial institution that is a resident of that Contracting State, and (ii) a resident of the other Contracting State acquires shares in the financial institution from the first-mentioned Contracting State, the first-mentioned Contracting State may tax gains derived by the resident of the other Contracting State from the alienation of such shares, provided that the alienation is made within five years from the first date on which such financial assistance was provided.
    次の(i)及び(ii)の規定に該当する場合には、一方の締約国の居住者がに規定する株式を譲渡（(i)の資金援助が最初に行われた日から五年以内に行われる譲渡に限る。）することによつて取得する収益に対しては、他方の締約国において租税を課することができる。(i)当該他方の締約国（日本国については、預金保険機構を含む。以下この３において同じ。）が、当該他方の締約国の金融機関の差し迫つた支払不能に係る破綻処理に関する法令に従つて、当該他方の締約国の居住者である金融機関に対して実質的な資金援助を行う場合(ii)当該一方の締約国の居住者が当該他方の締約国から当該金融機関の株式を取得する場合 - 財務省
  • Where (i) a Contracting State (including, for this purpose in the case of Japan, the Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan) provides, pursuant to the domestic law concerning failure resolution involving imminent insolvency of financial institutions in that Contracting State, substantial financial assistance to a financial institution that is a resident of that Contracting State, and (ii) a resident of the other Contracting State acquires shares in the financial institution from the first-mentioned Contracting State, the first-mentioned Contracting State may tax gains derived by the resident of the other Contracting State from the alienation of such shares, provided that the alienation is made within five years from the first date on which such financial assistance was provided.
    次の(i)及び(ii)に該当する場合において、一方の締約国の居住者が(ii)に規定する株式を譲渡（(i)の資金援助が最初に行われた日から五年以内に行われる譲渡に限る。)することによって取得する収益に対しては、他方の締約国において租税を課することができる。(i)当該他方の締約国（日本国については、預金保険機構を含む。以下この３において同じ。)が、当該他方の締約国の金融機関の差し迫った支払不能に係る破綻処理に関する法令に従って、当該他方の締約国の居住者である金融機関に対して実質的な資金援助を行うこと。(ii)当該一方の締約国の居住者が当該他方の締約国から当該金融機関の株式を取得すること。 - 財務省
  • 3. (a) Where (i) a Contracting Party (including, for this purpose in the case of Japan, the Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan) provides, pursuant to the laws of that Contracting Party concerning failure resolution involving imminent insolvency of financial institutions, substantial financial assistance to a financial institution that is a resident of that Contracting Party, and (ii) a resident of the other Contracting Party acquires shares in the financial institution from the first-mentioned Contracting Party, the first-mentioned Contracting Party may tax gains derived by the resident of the other Contracting Party from the alienation of such shares, provided that the alienation is made within five years from the first date on which such financial assistance was provided.
    ３(a)次の(i)及び(ii)に該当する場合において、一方の締約者の居住者がに規定する株式を譲渡（援助が最初に行われた日から五年以内に行われる譲渡に限る。）することによって取得する収益に対しては、他方の締約者において租税を課することができる。(i)当該他方の締約者（日本国については、預金保険機構を含む。以下この３において同じ。）が、金融機関の差し迫った支払不能に係る破綻処理に関する当該他方の締約者の法令に従って、当該他方の締約者の居住者である金融機関に対して実質的な資金援助を行うこと。(ii)当該一方の締約者の居住者が当該他方の締約者から当該金融機関の株式を取得すること。 - 財務省
  • 6. With reference to paragraph 3 of Article 11 of the Convention, the terms “the central bank” and “institution owned by that Government” mean: a) in the case of Japan: (i) the Bank of Japan; (ii) the Japan Finance Corporation; (iii) the Japan International Cooperation Agency; (iv) the Nippon Export and Investment Insurance; and (v) such other similar institution the capital of which is owned by the Government of Japan as may be agreed upon from time to time between the Governments of the Contracting States through an exchange of diplomatic notes; and b) in the case of the Netherlands: (i) the Central Bank of the Netherlands (De Nederlandsche Bank NV); (ii) the Netherlands Development Finance Company (de Nederlandse Financierings-Maatschappij voor Ontwikkelingslanden NV); (iii) the Netherlands Investment Bank for Developing Countries (de Nederlandse Investeringsbank voor Ontwikkelingslanden NV); and (iv) such other similar institution the capital of which is owned by the Government of the Netherlands as may be agreed upon from time to time between the Governments of the Contracting States through an exchange of diplomatic notes.
    ６条約第十一条３の規定に関し、「中央銀行」及び「政府が所有する機関」とは、次のものをいう。(a)日本国については、(i)日本銀行(ii)株式会社日本政策金融公庫(iii)独立行政法人国際協力機構(iv)独立行政法人日本貿易保険(v)日本国政府が資本を所有するその他の類似の機関で両締約国の政府が外交上の公文の交換により随時合意するもの(b)オランダについては、(i)オランダ中央銀行(ii)オランダ開発金融会社(iii)オランダ開発途上国投資銀行(iv)オランダ政府が資本を所有するその他の類似の機関で両締約国の政府が外交上の公文の交換により随時合意するもの - 財務省
  • (6) An institution which has been rated by a designated rating agency means, notwithstanding the difference of the actual rating and the preliminary rating, an institution that has been given a designated rating (which means a designated rating specified in Article 1, paragraph 4 of the Cabinet Office Ordinance concerning Capital Adequacy Ratios of Securities Companies; hereinafter the same shall apply in this table) of long term preferred debts (including debts that can be identified as equivalents), and the institution shall be deemed to be given a designated rating when said institution has been given the same rating as the designated rating with regard to a company rating or an insurance solvency rating. With regard to a consolidated subsidiary of a company with a designated rating that also submits a consolidated financial report, said consolidated subsidiary shall be deemed to be granted the designated rating, except for the cases where said consolidated subsidiary has been given a rating other than the designated rating.
    （６） 指定格付を付与された者 本格付又は予備格付の別を問わず、長期優先債務（こ れと同視し得る債務を含む。）に指定格付（証券会社の自己資本規制に関する内 閣府令第一条第四項の指定格付をいう。以下この表において同じ。）が付与され ている者をいい、会社格付又は保険金支払能力格付において指定格付と同等の 格付が付与されている場合には、指定格付を付与されているものとみなす。な お、指定格付を付与されている連結財務諸表提出会社の連結子会社については、 当該連結子会社が指定格付以外の格付を付与されている場合を除き、指定格付 を付与されたものとみなす。 - 経済産業省
  • Specific sectors for which commitments with a level of liberalization higher than that of GATS are as follows:- No limitation on market entry (allows 100% Japanese capital)Rental/leasing services, placement and supply services of personnel, packaging services, distribution services, environmental services and shipping agency services- Major sectors in respect of which commitments are made with certain conditions on market entry Financial services (insurance, banking): alleviation of foreign equity participation restrictions, alleviation of aggregate loan restrictions, liberalization of new services, etc. Maritime transport services, and international transport (freight and passengers)liberalization of sectors other than those pertaining to registration of Singapore-flag ships• Japan-Mexico EPA The chapter on services in the Japan-Mexico EPA adopts, as does NAFTA, the negative list approach. Under such approach, only specifically enumerated sectors in respect of which reservations(for example, reservations regarding national treatment) are made are eligible for completeliberalization.
    特定の分野において、GATS よりも自由化水準の高い約束をした主な分野は次のとおり。－市場参入制限なし（日本資本100％可）レンタル・リース、人材派遣サービス、梱包サービス、流通業、環境サービス、貨物輸送代理店サービス－市場参入等に一定の条件を設けた上で約束を行った主な分野金融サービス（保険、銀行）：外資規制の緩和、貸し付け総額規制の緩和、新サービスの自由化等海上輸送サービス国際運送（貨物及び旅客）：シンガポール船舶の登録に係るもの以外の自由化・日メキシコEPA日メキシコEPA サービス章は、NAFTA と同様、完全自由化の留保（内国民待遇等における留保）を行う分野のみをリスト化するネガティブリスト方式を採用している。 - 経済産業省
  • Article 96-4 The provisions of Article 207 (Contribution of Property Other than Monies), Article 212 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)) (Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount to Be Paid in), Article 213 (excluding paragraph (1), items (i) and (iii)) (Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property contributed), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to any stipulation for the matters listed in Article 92, item (iii); and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for payment under Article 212 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "director" in Article 207, paragraph (10), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director of the converting Mutual Company set forth in Article 86, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 209" and "Article 199, paragraph (1), item (iii)" in Article 207, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 96-2 of the Insurance Business Act" and "Article 92, item (iii) of that Act," respectively; the terms "Article 199, paragraph (1), item (iii)" and "application for subscription for shares for subscription or his/her manifestation of intention relating to the contract provided for in Article 205" in Article 212, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 92, item (iii) of the Insurance Business Act" and "application," respectively; and the term "shareholders having the shares" in Article 847, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholders having the shares (or, where six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) have not lapsed since the Effective Date of an Entity Conversion, persons who had been members from six months prior until the Effective Date of the Entity Conversion and have been holding the shares without interruption since the Effective Date of the Entity Conversion)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第九十六条の四　会社法第二百七条（金銭以外の財産の出資）、第二百十二条（第一項第一号を除く。）（不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任）、第二百十三条（第一項第一号及び第三号を除く。）（出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は第九十二条第三号に掲げる事項を定めた場合について、同法第七編第二章第二節（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第二百十二条（第一項第一号を除く。）の規定による支払を求める訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第二百七条第十項第一号中「取締役」とあるのは「保険業法第八十六条第一項に規定する組織変更をする相互会社の取締役」と、同法第二百十二条第一項第二号中「第二百九条」とあるのは「保険業法第九十六条の二」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「同法第九十二条第三号」と、同条第二項中「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「保険業法第九十二条第三号」と、「申込み又は第二百五条の契約」とあるのは「申込み」と、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「株式を有する株主（組織変更の効力発生日から六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間。以下この項において同じ。）を経過していないときは、六箇月前から当該組織変更の効力発生日まで引き続いて社員であった者であって、当該組織変更の効力発生日から引き続いて株式を有する株主）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) The provisions of Article 33 (Election of Inspector of Matters Described or Recorded in the Articles of Incorporation), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (v)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedure of Non-contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to investigation by an inspector on any of the matters listed in the items of the preceding paragraph where the Article of incorporation of a Mutual Company include any description or record on the matter. In this case, the term "rescind his/her manifestation of intention relating to subscription for the relevant Shares Issued at Incorporation" in Article 33, paragraph (8) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "resign from his/her office;" the term "Article 28, items (i) and (ii)" in paragraph (10), item (i) and the term "Article 28, item (i) or (ii)" in items (ii) and (iii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 24, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act," the term "items (i) and (ii) of that Article" in Article 33, paragraph (10), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that item," and the terms "Article 38, paragraph (1)"and "paragraph (2), item (ii) of the same Article" in Article 33, paragraph (11), item (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act" and "that paragraph," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    ２　会社法第三十三条（定款の記載又は記録事項に関する検査役の選任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、相互会社の定款に前項各号に掲げる事項についての記載又は記録があるときの検査役による当該事項の調査について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十三条第八項中「その設立時発行株式の引受けに係る意思表示を取り消す」とあるのは「その職を辞する」と、同条第十項第一号中「第二十八条第一号及び第二号」とあり、並びに同項第二号及び第三号中「第二十八条第一号又は第二号」とあるのは「保険業法第二十四条第一項第一号」と、同項第一号中「同条第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「同号」と、同条第十一項第三号中「第三十八条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の十第一項」と、「同条第二項第二号」とあるのは「同項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 180-15 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5), Article 372, paragraph (3), and Article 373) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operations of the board of liquidators of a Mutual Company with a board of liquidators; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence ), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or general representative, where the company has a General Meeting)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as set forth in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraph (2) (Omission of report to board of directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 180-14, paragraph (8) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第百八十条の十五　会社法第二編第四章第五節第二款（第三百六十七条、第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項、第三百七十二条第三項並びに第三百七十三条を除く。）（運営）の規定は清算人会設置相互会社の清算人会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第二項（議事録等）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項（取締役会への報告の省略）中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十四第八項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • I am a doctor by profession, so since 29 years ago, I have been working all along on matters related to social insurance, medical care, welfare, pensions, and nursing care.　I used to serve as chairman of an association of lawmakers aiming to dismantle the SIA at the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).　Looking back at the old days, around 1947-1948, Mr. Tatsuo Ozawa, who would later become an influential LDP lawmaker in matters related to social and labor issues, was serving as a director at the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and Mr.　Kunikichi Saito was serving as a director at the Ministry of Labour.　Around that time, in the years immediately after the end of the war, under the occupation of GHQ, there was much controversy over the system of assigning civil servants local government jobs, in short, over the treatment of SIA civil servants.
    ただし、私は本職は医者でございますから、29年前から、社会保険を初め医療・福祉・年金・介護というのは、私のライフワークでもございましたから、調べていただければ分かりますけれども、昔、私は自由民主党の社会保険庁解体議員連盟の会長をした人間でございまして、少し古い話を申し上げますと、これは昭和22～23年ごろ、小沢辰男さんという非常に自民党の社労の有力な方ですが、彼が厚生省の課長をしておりまして、もう1人、斎藤邦吉さんという方が労働省の課長をしておられた（、その）2人が課長をしたときに、いわゆる公務員の地方事務官（制度）の問題で、簡単に言いますと、社会保険庁の公務員というのはどうしようかと、戦後すぐ、GHQの下で非常にもめたのです。 - 金融庁
  • In this case involving the Ashikaga Bank, the scheme for special crisis management was implemented, also under the Deposit Insurance Act, and all deposits were protected in full as a result. The total amount of deposits was, if my memory is correct, 4 trillion yen in the case of the Ashikaga Bank, while it is 400 billion yen – one tenth, that is – in the case before us of the Incubator Bank. In that sense, what caused the failure of the Incubator Bank of Japan is the very skewed makeup of the borrowers of the bank, as I have just mentioned. While the total deposits (of the Incubator Bank of Japan) amount to a little more than 400 billion yen and consist of approximately 29,000 accounts, over 80 percent of them, or approximately 350 billion yen, were concentrated with 120 companies belonging to its network of relationships, as it were. Its purchases of loan claims from money lending businesses in recent years were also among the causes, as you must know well. Additionally, the Bank allegedly purchased claims from businesses like SFCG, which was formerly known as Shoko Fund.
    これは、確か預入金額も、足利銀行の場合は4兆円、この振興銀行の場合は4,000億円でございまして10分の1でございますから、そういった意味でも、今般、日本振興銀行が経営破綻した原因は、今さっき申し上げましたように、（日本振興銀行の）全預金額が4,000億円ちょっと、預金件数は2万9,000件ぐらいだったと思いますが、そのうち80％強、3,500億円程度を120社のネットワーク企業と申しますか、そういった方に非常に不自然に集中していたことや、近年貸金業者からの債権買取りもあったということは、皆様方、よくご存じだと思いますし、それからまた、SFCG、旧商工ファンドでございますけれども、そういったところからも債権を買い取っておられたというとこでございました。 - 金融庁
  • In relation to the injection of public funds into Shinsei Bank and Aozora Bank, I have a technical question. The two banks hold public funds totaling 400 billion yen on a book-value basis. According to questions and answers made in the Diet about 10 years ago, in addition to the three principles set forth by the Deposit Insurance Corporation, a condition was imposed whereby the two banks should repay an additional amount of funds. Probably, the repayment amount will be around 580 billion yen compared with the book value of 400 billion. Unless their stock prices, which are slumping at low levels now, rise to fairly high levels, repayment will be difficult. Am I correct in understanding that there is not any change in the financial conditions for the repayment?
    新生とあおぞら銀行の先ほどの公的資金の部分で、ややテクニカルな話で恐縮なのですが、今、両行には合わせて4,000億円の公的資金が簿価ベースで入っていて、これを返済するのが、10年ぐらい前の答弁だったと思うのですけれども、預保の三原則とは別に、これに一定金額を上乗せして返済するように、という条件だった、それでいくと、多分、両行で4,000億円の簿価に対して、おそらく5,800億円ぐらいにして返済を受けるというようなことになっていて、今も株価は低いですけれども、さらにかなり高いところまでいかないと返済がままならないというような状況になっているということがあると思うのですが、ここの金額面での条件というのも変更はないという理解でよろしいのでしょうか。 - 金融庁
  • Kitokuro ICHIKI, who was his intimate friend and chairman of the Privy Council, and other following figures participated in the memorial service: from the political circles and the official circles; Ministry of Education, House of Peers, Gakushikai (academia), German Consular Offices (Osaka and Kobe), Rentaro MIZUNO, Yosaburo TAKEGOSHI, Kanji ISHIHARA among others, from the educational circle; President of Waseda University Tomio NAKANO, President of Doshisha University Toraji MAKINO,President of Kwansai Gakuin University Kiichi KANZAKI, President of Kansai University Sho Takeda, Dean of Faculty of Law, Kyoto Imperial University Sotaro WATANABE, and from the business circle; President of Daido Life Insurance Company Kyuemon HIROOKA, President of Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK Line) Hisanobu TERAI, President of Osaka Shosen Kaisha (OSK Line) Eitaro OKADA, Board Chairperson of The Asahi Shinbun Company Choken Murayama, President of Mainichi Shinbun Shingoro TAKAISHI, President of the Yomiuri Shinbun Matsutaro SHORIKI, President of the Kyoto Shinbun Harunosuke USHIROGAWA, Sumitomo Zaibatsu (financial combine) Kichizaemon SUMITOMO, and others.
    親友で枢密院議長だった一木喜徳郎をはじめ、政官界などからは、文部大臣、貴族院、学士会、ドイツ総領事館（大阪・神戸）、水野錬太郎、竹越与三郎、石原莞爾らが、教育会からは、早稲田大学総長中野登美雄、同志社大学総長牧野虎次、関西学院大学長神崎模一、関西大学長竹田省、京都帝国大学法学部長渡辺宗太郎、財界からは、大同生命保険社長広岡久右衛門、日本郵船社長寺井久信、大阪商船社長岡田永太郎、朝日新聞社取締役会長村山長拳、毎日新聞社長高石真五郎、読売新聞社長正力松太郎、京都新聞社長後川晴之助、住友財閥の住友吉左衛門らが告別式に参列している。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • Article 38 (1) Members having consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three thousandths (or in cases where lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the total membership, or three thousand (or in cases where smaller number is prescribed in the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in mutual Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Providers specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Mutual Company"), members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order), who have been members of the Mutual Company, may demand the directors by showing the matters which shall be the purpose of the shareholders meeting (limited to matters on which the general meeting of members may adopt a resolution; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Division) and the reason of the calling, that they call the shareholders meeting.
    第三十八条　社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（少額短期保険業者である相互会社のうち政令で定めるもの（以下「特定相互会社」という。）にあっては、政令で定める数以上の社員）で六月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者は、取締役に対し、社員総会の目的である事項（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項に限る。以下この目において同じ。）及び招集の理由を示して、社員総会の招集を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 181-2 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 1, Subsection 4 (Performance of Obligations), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, the term "the items of Article 475" in Article 499, paragraph (1) (Public Notices to Creditors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 180, item (i) or (ii) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "court" in Article 500, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Prime Minister"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第百八十一条の二　会社法第二編第九章第一節第四款（債務の弁済等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、清算相互会社について準用する。この場合において、同法第四百九十九条第一項（債権者に対する公告等）中「第四百七十五条各号」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条各号」と、同法第五百条第二項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 215 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter IV, Section 1 (excluding Article 907) (General Provisions), and Article 933 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i) and paragraph (2), item (vii)) (Registration of Foreign Company), Article 934, paragraph (2) (Registration of Appointment of Representative Person in Japan, etc.), Article 935, paragraph (2) (Registration of Relocation of Domicile of Representative Person in Japan, etc.) and Article 936, paragraph (2) (Registration of Establishment of Business Office in Japan, etc.) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of a Foreign Mutual Company. In this case, the term "this Act" in Part VII, Chapter IV, Section 1 (excluding Article 907) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Insurance Business Act and this Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第二百十五条　会社法第七編第四章第一節（第九百七条を除く。）（総則）並びに第九百三十三条（第一項第一号及び第二項第七号を除く。）（外国会社の登記）、第九百三十四条第二項（日本における代表者の選任の登記等）、第九百三十五条第二項（日本における代表者の住所の移転の登記等）及び第九百三十六条第二項（日本における営業所の設置の登記等）の規定は、外国相互会社の登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第七編第四章第一節（第九百七条を除く。）中「この法律」とあるのは「保険業法及びこの法律」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 249 (1) In a Company Being Managed that is a Stock Company (excluding a Foreign Insurance Company, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article), resolutions of a Shareholders Meeting or class meeting listed in Articles 309, paragraph (2), item (iv), (v), (ix), (xi), or (xii) (Resolutions of Shareholders Meeting) or Articles 324, paragraph (2), item (i) or (iv) (Resolutions of Class Meeting) of the Companies Act, or resolutions pursuant to the provisions of Article 69, paragraph (2), Article 136, paragraph (2), Article 144, paragraph (3), Article 165-3, paragraph (2), or Article 165-10, paragraph (2), may be made provisionally by two-thirds or more of the votes held by the shareholders present, notwithstanding these provisions.
    第二百四十九条　株式会社である被管理会社（外国保険会社等を除く。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）における会社法第三百九条第二項第四号、第五号、第九号、第十一号若しくは第十二号（株主総会の決議）若しくは第三百二十四条第二項第一号若しくは第四号（種類株主総会の決議）に掲げる株主総会若しくは種類株主総会の決議又は第六十九条第二項、第百三十六条第二項、第百四十四条第三項、第百六十五条の三第二項若しくは第百六十五条の十第二項の規定による決議は、これらの規定にかかわらず、出席した株主の議決権の三分の二以上に当たる多数をもって、仮にすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (6) The relevant provisions of the Banking Act or the Long Term Credit Bank Act shall apply in lieu of the provisions of the preceding paragraphs to any Insurance Holding Company that intends to become a bank holding company (referring to a Bank Holding Company as defined in Article 2, paragraph (13) (Definitions, etc.) of the Banking Act; the same shall apply hereafter in this paragraph as well as in Article 272-39, paragraph (6)) or a Long Term Credit Bank holding company (referring to a Long Term Credit Bank holding company as defined in Article 16-4, paragraph (1) (Scope of Subsidiary Companies, etc.) of the Long Term Credit Bank Act; the same shall apply hereafter in this paragraph as well as in Article 272-39, paragraph (6)) by making a bank or Long Term Credit Bank its Subsidiary Company, or that already is a Bank Holding Company or Long Term Credit Bank holding company.
    ６　保険持株会社が、銀行若しくは長期信用銀行を子会社とすることにより銀行持株会社（銀行法第二条第十三項（定義等）に規定する銀行持株会社をいう。以下この項及び第二百七十二条の三十九第六項において同じ。）若しくは長期信用銀行持株会社（長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項（子会社の範囲等）に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社をいう。以下この項及び第二百七十二条の三十九第六項において同じ。）になろうとする場合又は銀行持株会社若しくは長期信用銀行持株会社である場合には、前各項の規定を適用せず、銀行法又は長期信用銀行法の相当規定の定めるところによる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) When an insurance administrator of a Mutual Company or any persons listed in Article 322, paragraph (1), items (iv) to (viii) inclusive, in the case of an Entity Conversion from a Mutual Company into a Stock Company, in soliciting subscribers for the shares prescribed in Article 92, has used materials explaining the business of the Stock Company following the Entity Conversion or other matters or an advertisement or other documents relating to said subscription which contain a false statement regarding a material matter, or has offered an electromagnetic record which contains a false statement regarding a material matter for carrying out affairs for said solicitation for subscription in the case where an electromagnetic record has been created in lieu of the creation of said documents, the same punishment as in paragraph (1) shall apply.
    ３　相互会社が株式会社となる組織変更をする場合において、相互会社の保険管理人又は第三百二十二条第一項第四号から第八号までに掲げる者が、第九十二条の規定による株式を引き受ける者の募集をするに当たり、組織変更後の株式会社の事業その他の事項に関する説明を記載した資料若しくは当該募集の広告その他の当該募集に関する文書であって重要な事項について虚偽の記載のあるものを行使し、又はこれらの書類の作成に代えて電磁的記録の作成がされている場合における当該電磁的記録であって重要な事項について虚偽の記録のあるものをその募集の事務の用に供したときも、第一項と同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 36 A Municipality, in a case when a person that is issued a Certification of Needed Long-Term Care or a Certification of Needed Support by another Municipality becomes an Insured Person of Long-Term Care Insurance of said Municipality and when said Insured Person submits an application for a Certification of Needed Long-Term Care or a Certification of Needed Support attached with the documents that are issued by said Municipality and the other Municipality and proves matters pertaining to said Certification of Needed Long-Term Care or Certification of Needed Support within fourteen (14) days from the date on which said qualification was obtained, may provide a Certification of Needed Long-Term Care or a Certification of Needed Support according to the matters entered on said documents, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 27, paragraph (4) and the first sentence of paragraph (7), or Article 32, paragraph (3) and the first sentence of paragraph (6), and without awaiting an examination or judgment of a Certification Committee.
    第三十六条　市町村は、他の市町村による要介護認定又は要支援認定を受けている者が当該市町村の行う介護保険の被保険者となった場合において、当該被保険者が、その資格を取得した日から十四日以内に、当該他の市町村から交付された当該要介護認定又は要支援認定に係る事項を証明する書面を添えて、要介護認定又は要支援認定の申請をしたときは、第二十七条第四項及び第七項前段又は第三十二条第三項及び第六項前段の規定にかかわらず、認定審査会の審査及び判定を経ることなく、当該書面に記載されている事項に即して、要介護認定又は要支援認定をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (5) A Money Lender shall not, when concluding a loan contract, require the counterparty or the person who intends to be the counterparty to the loan contract to conclude a contract for Security Measures for Performance of Obligations (meaning guarantees, insurance, and other measures specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as being similar thereto which are arranged for the purpose of securing performance of obligations under the contract; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) (limited to contracts covering a portion of the amount which is to be invalid under Article 8 of the Interest Rate Restriction Act, given that said provisions are applied by deeming that the amount of money paid as consideration for the Security Measures for Performance of Obligations is a guarantee charge provided for in that Article) with a person who is engaged in the business of Security Measures for Performance of Obligations on a regular basis, as a condition for concluding said loan contract.
    ５　貸金業者は、貸付けに係る契約の締結に際し、その相手方又は相手方となろうとする者に対し、債務履行担保措置（当該契約に基づく債務の履行を担保するための保証、保険その他これらに類するものとして内閣府令で定めるものをいう。以下この項において同じ。）に係る契約（当該債務履行担保措置の対価として支払われる金銭の額が当該金銭の額を利息制限法第八条第一項に規定する保証料の額とみなして同条の規定を適用したときに同条の規定により無効とされることとなる部分を含むものに限る。）を、債務履行担保措置を業として営む者と締結することを当該貸付けに係る契約の締結の条件としてはならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Thus, in order to complete such payment and settlement transactions, it is appropriate to clearly segregate the funds for payment and settlement in process,and to take the necessary measures to provide temporary funding such as loans from the Deposit Insurance Corporation.
    主に不動産取引等の決済のために用いられる金融機関発行の自己宛小切手。支払側が金融機関に代金を支払って小切手の発行を受け、受取側に交付。これを受取側が発行金融機関に持ち込むことにより換金を受けることができる。金融機関自らが小切手法上の振出人となるため、決済資金を自行預金からの振替資金として別段預金（自己宛小切手口）に経理していることから、金融機関破綻時には金融機関から受け入れた預金等として預金保険による保護の対象外となる。終了させるためには、仕掛かり中の決済資金のみを明確に分離したうえで、預金保険機構による資金貸付等の必要な措置を講じることが適当である。なお、仕掛かり中の決済資金については、その他の資金と分別して経理処理を行う方向で実務面の整備を速やかに進めることが必要である。 - 金融庁
  • Nor do I believe that creating huge banks and insurance companies is necessary for the Japanese economy or for the people's lives. As I have been saying, we will reform the postal businesses because we believe that we must not allow the privatization carried out by the former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi to significantly undermine the mission performed since the Meiji Era for the sake of the country and local communities by the postal businesses, which used to be essential to the people's lives. Therefore, as I have said over and over again, our basic stance is that the postal businesses should start over as an organization capable of fulfilling the social functions that Japan Post has assumed since the Meiji Era, rather than pursuing acting as a pure financial institution. Our cabinet resolution (on October 20) has also set forth such a direction.
    問題は、もう前から言っているように、ある意味で国民生活にとって不可欠な郵政事業が、明治以来担っていた国家や地域社会に対しての任務が、純ちゃん（小泉純一郎 元総理）のああいう民営化によって、極端に損なわれていくということがあってはならないということから見直しをやるわけですから、何度も言うように、そういう意味で、郵政事業が金融機関としてやる、金融機関プロパーとしての存在意義というよりも、むしろ従来、明治以来担ってきた日本郵政の社会的責任みたいなものを、もう一度果たしてもらえる組織として、今後、出発してもらいたいというのが、我々の基本的な考え方ですし、閣議決定した方向も、そういう方向になっているわけですから。 - 金融庁
  • (6) For the period of paid leave under the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (3) inclusive, the employer shall, in accordance with the rules of employment or the equivalent thereto, pay either the average wage or the amount of wages that would normally be paid for working the prescribed working hours; provided, however, that when there is a written agreement either with a labor union organized by a majority of the workers at the workplace concerned (in the case that where such labor union is organized) or with a person representing a majority of the workers in the case that such labor union is not organized), which provides for the payment for the period of a sum equivalent to the daily amount of standard remuneration provided for under paragraph (1) of Article 99 of the Health Insurance Law (Act No. 70 of 1922), such agreement shall be complied with.
    ６　使用者は、第一項から第三項までの規定による有給休暇の期間については、就業規則その他これに準ずるもので定めるところにより、平均賃金又は所定労働時間労働した場合に支払われる通常の賃金を支払わなければならない。ただし、当該事業場に、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がある場合においてはその労働組合、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がない場合においては労働者の過半数を代表する者との書面による協定により、その期間について、健康保険法　（大正十一年法律第七十号）第九十九条第一項に定める標準報酬日額に相当する金額を支払う旨を定めたときは、これによらなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) The provisions of Article 34, paragraphs (2) and (3) shall apply mutatis mutandis to an association set forth in Article 33, item (vi) or an employer set forth in item (vii) of said Article which/who has obtained the approval of the government set forth in the preceding paragraph, and the provision of Article 34, paragraph (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the right of a person listed in Article 33, item (vi) or (vii) to receive insurance benefits. In this case, the term "the approval set forth in the preceding paragraph" and "the approval set forth in paragraph (1)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "the approval set forth in Article 36, paragraph (1)", and the term "the persons listed in said item and item (ii) of said Article collectively" in Article 34, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a person listed in items (vi) or (vii) of said Article", and the term "items (i) and (ii) of said Article" in paragraph (4) of said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33, item (vi) or (vii)".
    ２　第三十四条第二項及び第三項の規定は前項の承認を受けた第三十三条第六号の団体又は同条第七号の事業主について、第三十四条第四項の規定は第三十三条第六号又は第七号に掲げる者の保険給付を受ける権利について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「前項の承認」とあり、及び「第一項の承認」とあるのは「第三十六条第一項の承認」と、第三十四条第二項中「同号及び同条第二号に掲げる者を包括して」とあるのは「同条第六号又は第七号に掲げる者を」と、同条第四項中「同条第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「第三十三条第六号又は第七号」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) The Minister of Labour shall, for the time being, modify the daily amount of the benefit for daily work job applicant of four thousand one hundred yen to six thousand two hundred yen, and the classified daily amount of eight thousand two hundred yen to eleven thousand three hundred yen, respectively, if the daily amount of the benefit for daily work job applicant, etc. is to be modified pursuant to the provision of Article 49, paragraph (1) of the New Employment Insurance Act on the ground that the amount of average regular salary comes to exceed one hundred twenty one hundredth (120/100) of the amount of average regular salary of September 1994 (or the immediately preceding average regular salary being the basis of modification in the case where the daily amount of the benefit for daily work job applicant, etc. has been modified pursuant to the same paragraph; hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph), notwithstanding the provision of the same paragraph.
    ３　労働大臣は、当分の間、平均定期給与額が平成六年九月の平均定期給与額（新雇用保険法第四十九条第一項の規定により日雇労働求職者給付金の日額等が変更されたときは、直近の当該変更の基礎となった平均定期給与額。次項において同じ。）の百分の百二十を超えるに至ったことにより同項の規定により日雇労働求職者給付金の日額等を変更する場合においては、同項の規定にかかわらず、日雇労働求職者給付金の日額である四千百円については六千二百円に、等級区分日額である八千二百円については一万千三百円に、それぞれ変更するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
＜前へ 1 2 .... 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 次へ＞

例文データの著作権について