「c-note」を含む例文一覧(66)
＜前へ 1 2- Where a Remittance Handling Financial Institution, etc. makes continuous outgoing remittances with the same content after having the customer register the receiver and the purpose of the remittance in advance, if it is difficult to confirm with the customer whether the outgoing remittance violates the Regulations on the Purpose of Use of Funds on each occasion of outgoing remittance, the Remittance Handling Financial Institution, etc. shall be deemed to fulfill the check item if it takes actions equivalent to those stated in (Note) vi)a-c in II.7.(1)(iii)a. However, in making an outgoing remittance to a specific country on which the Regulations on the Purpose of Use of Funds have been imposed, the Remittance Handling Financial Institution, etc. must carry out confirmation prescribed in (iv)a. above with the customer on each occasion of remittance.
顧客に事前に受取人及び送金目的を登録させた上で、継続的に同様の内容で仕向送金を行う場合において、仕向送金の都度、顧客に対して資金使途規制に抵触するものか否か、確認を行うことが困難な場合には、Ⅱ．７．(1) ③ イ．ⅵ）a～c と同等の対応をとっていればチェック項目を満たすものとする。ただし、資金使途規制が講じられている特定国への仕向送金を行う場合には、上記イ．に定められている確認を、都度、顧客に対して行う必要がある。 - 財務省 - Self-reactive substances, by definition, do not include the following: Explosives, oxidizing liquids and oxidizing solids (mixtures of oxidizing liquids and solids, containing more than 5% combustible organic substances, are examined in accordance with Note 1 of GHS 2.8.2.2). Organic peroxides. Those with decomposition energy of less than 300 j/g. Those whose self-accelerating decomposition temperature (SADT) exceeds 75°C for a 50 kg package.
火薬類、酸化性液体および酸化性固体（ただし、酸化性液体／固体の混合物で、5％以上の可燃性有機物質を含むものは、GHS2.8.2.2のNOTE1に従い自己反応性物質への該否が判断される）、有機過酸化物のいずれかに該当する場合、あるいは分解熱が300J/g未満のもの、または50kgの包装物の自己加速分解温度(SADT)が75℃を超えるものは、自己反応性物質に区分されない。 - 経済産業省 - The entity is automatically withdrawn from the Appendix if the Committee on Government Procurement is notified of the withdrawal and no objection has been made. Should there be an objection, it will be settled under the procedures described in section (c) above. We note that a quid pro quo is not necessarily required for a modification to the Appendix. In other words, the party is not obligated to offer a new entity of similar size in exchange for the one withdrawn.
具体的には、政府調達委員会に民営化による除外が通報されたときに、他の加入国からの異議がなければ除外がそのまま認められ、異議があった場合は紛争解決手続によって解決を図ることができる旨規定されており、附属書の修正に伴う補償的な措置、即ち除外された機関に見合う新たなオファーが必ずしも義務づけられないこととされた。 - 経済産業省 - In the confirmation, external auditors may perform procedures including the review of the internal control records described in Section 3(7)[1], C to F, of Chapter II, “Assessment and Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting,” querying of the management and appropriate managers or responsible personnel, or other procedures. However, they should note that if they have already examined the existence of business processes that have a significant impact on the financial reporting while in the process of the Financial Statement Audit, the result of such an examination may be used.
この際、監査人は、「Ⅱ 財務報告に係る内部統制の評価及び報告」３．（７）① ハ．ニ．ホ．ヘ．に記載の内部統制の記録の閲覧や経営者及び適切な管理者又は担当者への質問等により確認を行うが、財務諸表監査を通じて、財務報告に重要な影響を及ぼす業務プロセスの存否に係る検証が既に行われている場合には、その利用が可能であることに留意する。 - 金融庁 - b. External auditors should note that, for the purpose of ensuring an accurate understanding of the status of internal control design, it is useful for them to select one or more typical transactions of each business process included in the scope of assessment, and trace the business flow from their origination to their recording in financial statements, according to the records on internal controls described in Section 3(7)[1], C to F of Chapter II, “Assessment and Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting,” etc.
ｂ．監査人が内部統制の整備状況に関する理解を確実なものとする上では、評価対象となった業務プロセスごとに、代表的な取引を１つあるいは複数選んで、取引の開始から取引記録が財務諸表に計上されるまでの流れを「Ⅱ 財務報告に係る内部統制の評価及び報告」３．（７）① ハ．ニ．ホ．ヘ．に記載の内部統制の記録等により追跡する手続を実施することが有用であることに留意する。 - 金融庁 - b. External auditors should note that, for the purpose of ensuring an accurate understanding of the status of internal control design, it is useful for them to select one or more typical transactions of each business process included in the scope of assessment, and trace their business flow from their origination to their recording in financial statements, according to the records on internal controls described in Section 3(7)[1], C to F of Chapter II, “Assessment and Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting,” etc.
ｂ．監査人が内部統制の整備状況に関する解を確実ものとする上では、評価対象となった業務プロセスごとに、代表的な取引を１つあるいは複数選んで、取引の開始から取引記録が財務諸表に計上されるまでの流れを「Ⅱ 財務報告に係る内部統制の評価及び報告」３．（７）① ハ．ニ．ホ．ヘ．に記載の内部統制の記録等により追跡する手続を実施することが有用であることに留意する。 - 金融庁 - Where a Remittance Handling Financial Institution, etc. receives a certain amount of funds after having a customer register the purpose of the remittance in advance and the customer continuously withdraws own funds overseas for the same purpose, if it is difficult to confirm with the customer whether the transaction violates the Regulations on the Purpose of Use of Funds on each occasion of withdrawal of the funds overseas or receipt of additional funds, the Remittance Handling Financial Institution, etc. shall be deemed to fulfill the check item if it takes actions equivalent to those stated in (Note) vi)a-c in II.7.(1)(iii)a. However, in making an outgoing remittance to a specific country on which the Regulations on the Purpose of Use of Funds have been imposed, the Remittance Handling Financial Institution, etc. must carry out confirmation prescribed in (iv)a. above on each occasion of transaction.
顧客から送金目的を事前に登録させた上で、一定の資金を預かり、顧客本人が海外にて継続的に同様の目的で自己資金を引き出す場合において、同資金の海外における引き出しの都度又は追加資金を預かる際に、顧客に対して当該取引が資金使途規制等に抵触するものか否か確認を行うことが困難な場合には、Ⅱ．７．(1) ③ イ．ⅵ）a～c と同等の対応をとっていればチェック項目を満たすものとする。ただし、資金使途規制が講じられている特定国への仕向送金を行う場合には、上記イ．に定められている確認を、都度、顧客に対して行う必要がある。 - 財務省 - (C) Where the final offer stage induces the customer to make a final offer without confirming the contents of the offer due to the confusing structure of the system (unless otherwise amended by the consumer with complete attention): e.g., the configuration of the final offer stage webpage makes it nearly impossible to determine for how many units the user is making an offer Reference Note: Public guidelines exist concerning what webpage layouts pertain to the respective cases mentioned immediately above (Guidelines on "Actions to Have the Customer Request a Contract Contrary to the Wishes of the Customer" in internet trading).
ｃ）申込みの内容として、予め（申込み者が自分で変更しない限りは）、同一 商品を複数申し込むように設定してあるなど、一般的には想定されない設定がなされており、よほど注意していない限り、申込み内容を認識しないままに申し込んでしまうようになっている場合。（参考）いかなる画面が上記場合に該当するか否かについて、ガイドラインが公表されている（インターネット通販における「意に反して契約の申込みをさせようとする行為」に係るガイドライン）。 - 経済産業省 - With respect to information gathering and inspections regarding foreign audit firms, etc.(hereafter referred to as “firms” (Note 1)), the Financial Services Agency (hereafter referred to as the “FSA”) and the Certified Public Accountants and Auditing Oversight Board (hereafter referred to as the “CPAAOB”) will, in principle, rely on such actions by the competent authorities of the firms’ home jurisdictions (hereafter referred to as “foreign competent authorities”), instead of seeking to obtain information from or conducting inspections on firms themselves, provided that (a) audit and public oversight systems in the firms’ home jurisdictions are equivalent to those of Japan (Note2), (b)necessary information can be provided from the foreign competent authorities through appropriate arrangements of information exchange, and (c) reciprocity is ensured.
金融庁及び公認会計士・監査審査会（以下「審査会」という。）は、①外国監査法人等（注1）の所属する国の監査制度や監査人監督体制が我が国と同等であり（注2）、②情報交換等に係る取極め等により、必要な情報が得られ、かつ、③相互主義が担保される場合には、当該外国監査法人等の所属する国の当局（以下「当該国当局」という。）が行う報告徴収又は検査に依拠することとし、原則として、当該国の外国監査法人等に対する報告徴収及び検査は行わないものとする。 - 金融庁 - In addition, individual business processes that have a high degree of materiality (as described below) may be included in the scope. Instead of two-thirds of total sales on a consolidation basis, a certain ratio may be applied to aggregated sales (before elimination of inter-company transactions). For this certain ratio, if that location or business unit was in the assessment scope as a material location or business unit in the previous fiscal year, and if it is confirmed that a) the assessment result indicated effective internal control over that location in the previous fiscal year, b) there were no material changes in the design of internal controls over that location or business unit, c) among the material locations and business units, it is not a particularly material location or business unit, e.g. it is not a core company in the group, then that location or business unit could be excluded from the assessment scope. In that case, as a result, the certain ratio may be less than 2/3 of consolidated sales, etc. to some extent (Note 3) As sales amounts of affiliated companies are not included in a company's consolidated sales, the management cannot use the certain ratio of consolidated sales for affiliates. Instead, the management should evaluate the degree of the affiliate's impact on the company's financial statements and determine whether the affiliate should be deemed to be in the scope or not based on its financial statement.
この一定割合については、当該事業拠点が前年度に重要な事業拠点として評価範囲に入っており、イ）前年度の当該拠点に係る内部統制の評価結果が有効であること、ロ）当該拠点の内部統制の整備状況に重要な変更がないこと、ハ）重要な事業拠点の中でも、グループ内での中核会社でないなど特に重要な事業拠点でないことを確認できた場合には、当該事業拠点を本年度の評価対象としないことができると考えられる。その場合、結果として、売上高等の概ね２／３を相当程度下回ることがあり得る。 - 金融庁 - (8) The provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to paragraphs (2) and (3). In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
８ 会社法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、第二項及び第三項の場合について準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) The provisions of Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-25, paragraph (2), and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company has no executive officer or any vacancy in the number of executive officers prescribed by the articles of incorporation. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
３ 第五十三条の二十五第二項において準用する会社法第四百一条第二項から第四項までの規定並びに同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、執行役が欠けた場合又は定款で定めた執行役の員数が欠けた場合について準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) The provisions of Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive (Removal of Committee Members), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the committee members of a company with Committees. In this case, the term "paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 401, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-24, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
２ 会社法第四百一条第二項から第四項まで（委員の解職等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、委員会設置会社の委員について準用する。この場合において、同法第四百一条第二項中「前条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の二十四第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (5) The provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies) and Article 351 (Measures when Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company; the provision of Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person appointed by a provisional disposition order under Article 56 (Commission of Registration of Provisional Disposition for Stay of Execution of Duties by Representative of Juridical Person, etc.) of the Civil Provisional Relief Act to act for a liquidator or the Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-contentious cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidator(s) or Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (b) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person who should carry out the duties of the temporary Representative Liquidator of a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
５ 会社法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は清算相互会社の代表清算人について、同法第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）の規定は民事保全法（平成元年法律第九十一号）第五十六条（法人の代表者の職務執行停止の仮処分等の登記の嘱託）に規定する仮処分命令により選任された清算相互会社の清算人又は代表清算人の職務を代行する者について、会社法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は清算相互会社の清算人又は代表清算人について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号ロ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は清算相互会社の一時代表清算人の職務を行うべき者について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 53-32 The provisions of Article 419 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (2)) (Executive Officer's Duty to Report to Audit Committee Members), Article 421 (Apparent Representative Executive Officers) and Article 422, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Executive Officers by Shareholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the executive officers of a company with Committees; the provision of Article 420 (Representative Executive Officers) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative executive officer of a company with Committees; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the executive officers or representative executive officer of a company with Committees; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative executive officer of a company with Committees. In this case, the term "Article 355, Article 356 and Article 365, paragraph (2)" in the first sentence of Article 419, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 355, Article 356 and Article 365, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 357" in Article 419, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 357 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5)," "Article 352" and "Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive" in Article 420, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act," "Article 352 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of that Act" and "Article 401, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-25 of the Insurance Business Act," respectively; and the term "shareholders having the shares" in Article 422, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
第五十三条の三十二 会社法第四百十九条（第二項後段を除く。）（執行役の監査委員に対する報告義務等）、第四百二十一条（表見代表執行役）及び第四百二十二条第一項（株主による執行役の行為の差止め）の規定は委員会設置会社の執行役について、同法第四百二十条（代表執行役）の規定は委員会設置会社の代表執行役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は委員会設置会社の執行役又は代表執行役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は委員会設置会社の代表執行役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百十九条第二項前段中「第三百五十五条、第三百五十六条及び第三百六十五条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十五条、第三百五十六条及び第三百六十五条第二項」と、同条第三項中「第三百五十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十七条」と、同法第四百二十条第三項中「第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項」と、「第三百五十二条」とあるのは「同法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百五十二条」と、「第四百一条第二項から第四項まで」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の二十五第二項において準用する第四百一条第二項から第四項まで」と、同法第四百二十二条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.
第五十三条の十五 会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
- ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
- 経済産業省
- Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
- 財務省
- Copyright(C) 財務省
※この記事は財務省ホームページの情報を転載しております。内容には仮訳のものも含まれており、今後内容に変更がある可能性がございます。
財務省は利用者が当ホームページの情報を用いて行う一切の行為について、何ら責任を負うものではありません。
- 金融庁
- Copyright(C) 2026 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
