「employee」を含む例文一覧(2792)
＜前へ 1 2 .... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56- (vi) In the case that the patented invention is an employee invention made by person who is either an officer or employees exclusively engaged in research of a local incorporated administrative agency (meaning a Local Incorporated Administrative Agency as prescribed in Article 2, paragraph 1 of the Local Incorporated Administrative Agency Act (Act No. 118 of 2003) other than a Public University Corporation prescribed in Article 68, paragraph 1 of the same Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article ) which conducts business related to research and development (hereinafter in this Article referred to as "Local Incorporated Administrative Agency Researcher"), said Local Incorporated Administrative Agency which has succeeded the right to obtain a patent from that Local Incorporated Administrative Agency Researcher.
六 その特許発明が地方独立行政法人（地方独立行政法人法（平成十五年法律第百十八号）第二条第一項に規定する地方独立行政法人であって、同法第六十八条第一項に規定する公立大学法人以外のものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）であって試験研究に関する業務を行うものの役員又はその職員のうち専ら研究に従事する者（以下この条において「地方独立行政法人研究者」という。）がした職務発明である場合において、その地方独立行政法人研究者から特許を受ける権利を承継した当該地方独立行政法人 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (vii) In the case that the patented invention is an employee invention made by University, etc. Researcher and the right to obtain a patent related to said patented invention was succeeded by a person who received approval set forth in Article 4, paragraph 1 of the Act on the Promotion of Technology Transfer from Universities to Private Industry (including a person who received approval of changes pursuant to the provisions of Article 5, paragraph 1 of the same Act,; hereinafter in this Article and in Supplementary Provisions Article 3 referred to as "Accredited TLO"), the person that establishes said University or College of Technology, or Inter-University Research Institutes which has succeeded the right to obtain said patent from said Accredited TLO.
七 その特許発明が大学等研究者がした職務発明である場合であって、当該特許発明に係る特許を受ける権利が大学等における技術に関する研究成果の民間事業者への移転の促進に関する法律第四条第一項の承認を受けた者（同法第五条第一項の変更の承認を受けた者を含む。以下この条及び附則第三条において「承認事業者」という。）に承継されていた場合において、当該承認事業者から当該特許を受ける権利を承継した当該大学若しくは高等専門学校を設置する者又は大学共同利用機関法人 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (4) The operating rules in item (iii) of the preceding paragraph shall set forth methods to conduct services involved in demand of an injunction, to manage information obtained in the course of conducting said services and to hold confidentiality, and other matters provided by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. In this case, the methods to conduct services involved in demand of an injunction set forth in the operating rules shall include such measures as obtaining advice from and hearing the opinions of an Expert Adviser within a section responsible for reviewing such demands as provided by item (v) of the preceding paragraph, as to the case where an officer, employee or Expert Advisor has special interests with a business operator, etc. who is an adverse party of the injunction, or other measures to ensure fair provision of such services.
４ 前項第三号の業務規程には、差止請求関係業務の実施の方法、差止請求関係業務に関して知り得た情報の管理及び秘密の保持の方法その他の内閣府令で定める事項が定められていなければならない。この場合において、業務規程に定める差止請求関係業務の実施の方法には、同項第五号の検討を行う部門における専門委員からの助言又は意見の聴取に関する措置及び役員、職員又は専門委員が差止請求に係る相手方である事業者等と特別の利害関係を有する場合の措置その他業務の公正な実施の確保に関する措置が含まれていなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 49 (1) When an officer, employee or Expert Advisor of a qualified consumer organization receives or has a third party receive (including said qualified consumer organization) money or other property benefits, whether it be donation, grant or other remuneration from the opposite person pertaining to the injunction demanded by the qualified consumer organization, in consideration for not exercising or not having exercised the right to demand an injunction, waiving or having waived the right to demand an injunction, entering or having entered into settlement related to the demand of an injunction with a Business Operator, etc. or terminating or having terminated court proceedings or other proceedings pertaining to the demand of an injunction for other reasons, they shall be punished by imprisonment with work for not more than 3 years or by a fine of not more than three million yen (3,000,000 yen).
第四十九条 適格消費者団体の役員、職員又は専門委員が、適格消費者団体の差止請求に係る相手方から、寄附金、賛助金その他名目のいかんを問わず、当該適格消費者団体においてその差止請求権の行使をしないこと若しくはしなかったこと、その差止請求権の放棄をすること若しくはしたこと、事業者等との間でその差止請求に係る和解をすること若しくはしたこと又はその差止請求に係る訴訟その他の手続を他の事由により終了させること若しくは終了させたことの報酬として、金銭その他の財産上の利益を受け、又は第三者（当該適格消費者団体を含む。）に受けさせたときは、三年以下の懲役又は三百万円以下の罰金に処する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - vi) An applicant has been who was rescinded with their designation pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 of Article 50 (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph 3 and 4 of the same Article; the same shall apply in this paragraph.) and who has not yet spent 5 years of the date of rescission (in the event that such person whose designation was rescinded is a juridical person, a person who was a board member of such juridical person, a person who directed the place of business for service, or a person who is the other employee prescribed in the Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to as "board member, etc.") within 60 days of the day of notice pursuant to Article 15 of Administrative Procedure Act ( Act No.88 of 1993) pertaining to such rescission, who has not yet spent 5 years from the day of such rescission shall be included; in the event that such person whose designation was rescinded is not a juridical person, a manager of such person within 60 days of the day of such notice, who has not yet spent 5 years from the day of such rescission shall be included.
六 申請者が、第五十条第一項（同条第三項及び第四項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定により指定を取り消され、その取消しの日から起算して五年を経過しない者（当該指定を取り消された者が法人である場合においては、当該取消しの処分に係る行政手続法（平成五年法律第八十八号）第十五条の規定による通知があった日前六十日以内に当該法人の役員又はそのサービス事業所を管理する者その他の政令で定める使用人（以下「役員等」という。）であった者で当該取消しの日から起算して五年を経過しないものを含み、当該指定を取り消された者が法人でない場合においては、当該通知があった日前六十日以内に当該者の管理者であった者で当該取消しの日から起算して五年を経過しないものを含む。）であるとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 121 (1) In the event that a person who has violated this Act is an agent or other employee acting on behalf of the business operator of the enterprise, with respect to matters concerning workers at that enterprise, the fine under the relevant Article shall also be assessed against the business operator; provided, however, that this shall not apply in the event that the business operator has taken necessary measures to prevent such violation (In the event that the business operator is a juridical person, the representative thereof shall be deemed business operator; and in the event that the business operator is a minor or an adult ward who lacks the capacity regarding business of an adult, the statutory representative thereof shall be deemed business operator (if the statutory representative is a juridical person, the representative thereof). The same shall apply hereinafter in this Article.).
第百二十一条 この法律の違反行為をした者が、当該事業の労働者に関する事項について、事業主のために行為した代理人、使用人その他の従業者である場合においては、事業主に対しても各本条の罰金刑を科する。ただし、事業主（事業主が法人である場合においてはその代表者、事業主が営業に関し成年者と同一の行為能力を有しない未成年者又は成年被後見人である場合においてはその法定代理人（法定代理人が法人であるときは、その代表者）を事業主とする。次項において同じ。）が違反の防止に必要な措置をした場合においては、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) In the case of ordering a trade association to take measures provided for in paragraph 1 or paragraph 2 of Article 7, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph, the Fair Trade Commission may, when it finds it particularly necessary, pursuant to the procedures as provided for in Section II of Chapter VIII, also order an officer, manager, or constituent entrepreneur (including the relevant entrepreneur when an officer, employee, agent, or any other person acting for the benefit of an entrepreneur is a constituent entrepreneur; the same shall apply in paragraph 1 of Article 26 and paragraph 2 of Article 59) of the said association to take measures necessary to ensure the measures provided for in paragraph 1 or paragraph 2 of Article 7, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph.
３ 公正取引委員会は、事業者団体に対し、第一項又は前項において準用する第七条第二項に規定する措置を命ずる場合において、特に必要があると認めるときは、第八章第二節に規定する手続に従い、当該団体の役員若しくは管理人又はその構成事業者（事業者の利益のためにする行為を行う役員、従業員、代理人その他の者が構成事業者である場合には、当該事業者を含む。第二十六条第一項及び第五十九条第二項において同じ。）に対しても、第一項又は前項において準用する第七条第二項に規定する措置を確保するために必要な措置を命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 24-15 (1) When a prefectural governor finds necessary, he/she may order a person who is, or used to be, the establisher or director or any other employee of a Designated Institution for Mentally Retarded Children, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "Designated Institution Establisher, etc.") to make a report or submit or present books and documents and other objects, request the appearance of a person who is, or used to be, a Designated Institution Establisher, etc., or may make said prefecture's official ask relevant persons questions or enter any office of said Designated Institution for Mentally Retarded Children, etc. and inspect books and documents and other objects.
第二十四条の十五 都道府県知事は、必要があると認めるときは、指定知的障害児施設等の設置者若しくはその長その他の従業者（以下「指定施設設置者等」という。）である者若しくは指定施設設置者等であつた者に対し、報告若しくは帳簿書類その他の物件の提出若しくは提示を命じ、指定施設設置者等である者若しくは指定施設設置者等であつた者に対し出頭を求め、又は当該職員に、関係者に対し質問させ、若しくは当該指定知的障害児施設等に立ち入り、その設備若しくは帳簿書類その他の物件を検査させることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) The provisions of paragraph (1) shall not apply where the application, promise or provision of property benefit prescribed in the respective items of said paragraph is made or conducted in order to compensate in whole or in part a loss incurred from a Problematic Conduct (meaning an illegal or unjust act conducted by a Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. or Officer or employee thereof that is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of a dispute between said Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. and his/her customer; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section and the following Section); provided, however, that with regard to the offer or promise made under item (ii) of said paragraph or the provision of property benefit under item (iii) of said paragraph, this provision shall only apply in cases where said Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. has obtained confirmation from the Prime Minister in advance to the effect that the loss to be compensated was incurred from a Problematic Conduct or other cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance.
３ 第一項の規定は、同項各号の申込み、約束又は提供が事故（金融商品取引業者等又はその役員若しくは使用人の違法又は不当な行為であつて当該金融商品取引業者等とその顧客との間において争いの原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるものをいう。以下この節及び次節において同じ。）による損失の全部又は一部を補てんするために行うものである場合については、適用しない。ただし、同項第二号の申込み又は約束及び同項第三号の提供にあつては、その補てんに係る損失が事故に起因するものであることにつき、当該金融商品取引業者等があらかじめ内閣総理大臣の確認を受けている場合その他内閣府令で定める場合に限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (ii) a shareholder who has the right prescribed in Article 433(1) of the Companies Act, an ordinary equity investor prescribed in the Act on Preferred Equity Investment who is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as being deemed to have the right similar to said right, or a member who has the right prescribed in Article 433(3) of said Act of the Listed Company, etc. (including an Officer, etc. of such a shareholder, ordinary equity investor or member in cases where such a shareholder, ordinary equity investor or member is a juridical person (including an organization without judicial personality for which the representative person or administrator has been designated; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article), and an agent or employee of such a shareholder, ordinary equity investor or member in cases where such a shareholder, ordinary equity investor or member is a person other than a juridical person): where such a shareholder, ordinary equity investor or member has come to know a material fact in the course of exercise of the right;
二 当該上場会社等の会社法第四百三十三条第一項に定める権利を有する株主若しくは優先出資法に規定する普通出資者のうちこれに類する権利を有するものとして内閣府令で定める者又は同条第三項に定める権利を有する社員（これらの株主、普通出資者又は社員が法人（法人でない団体で代表者又は管理人の定めのあるものを含む。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）であるときはその役員等を、これらの株主、普通出資者又は社員が法人以外の者であるときはその代理人又は使用人を含む。） 当該権利の行使に関し知つたとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) If an Officer, etc. (meaning an officer, agent, employee and other worker of said Issuer; hereinafter the same shall apply in paragraph (5)) of an Issuer which has submitted Offering Disclosure Documents containing a fake statement on important matters who has been involved in submission of said Offering Disclosure Documents with knowledge of the fact that said Offering Disclosure Documents contain any misstatement has sold Securities owned by said Officer, etc. through secondary distribution based on said Offering Disclosure Documents, the Prime Minister shall, in accordance with the procedures prescribed in the following Section, order said Officer, etc., to pay to the national treasury an administrative monetary penalty equivalent to one percent of the total distribution price of the sold Securities (two percent, in cases where such Securities are the Share Certificates, etc.).
２ 重要な事項につき虚偽の記載がある発行開示書類を提出した発行者の役員等（当該発行者の役員、代理人、使用人その他の従業者をいう。第五項において同じ。）であつて、当該発行開示書類に虚偽の記載があることを知りながら当該発行開示書類の提出に関与した者が、当該発行開示書類に基づく売出しにより当該役員等が所有する有価証券を売り付けたときは、内閣総理大臣は、次節に定める手続に従い、当該役員等に対し、当該売り付けた有価証券の売出価額の総額の百分の一（当該有価証券が株券等である場合にあつては、百分の二）に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命じなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 198-3 In the cases of violations of Article 38-2 or Article 39(1) (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66-15), Article 41-2(ii) or (v), or Article 42-2(i), (iii), or (vi), a representative person, agent, employee or other worker of a Financial Instruments Business Operator or a Financial Instruments Intermediary Service Provider, or a Financial Instruments Business Operator or a Financial Instruments Intermediary Service Provider that has committed such violation shall be punished by imprisonment with work for not more than three years or by a fine of not more than three million yen, or both.
第百九十八条の三 第三十八条の二若しくは第三十九条第一項（これらの規定を第六十六条の十五において準用する場合を含む。）、第四十一条の二第二号若しくは第五号又は第四十二条の二第一号、第三号若しくは第六号の規定に違反した場合においては、その行為をした金融商品取引業者等若しくは金融商品仲介業者の代表者、代理人、使用人その他の従業者又は金融商品取引業者若しくは金融商品仲介業者は、三年以下の懲役若しくは三百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 198-5 In the case of act of violation set forth in any of the following items, a representative person, agent, employee or other worker of a Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc., Authorized Transaction-at-Exchange Operator, Financial Instruments Intermediary Service Provider, Authorized Financial Instruments Firms Association or Public Interest Corporation-Type Financial Instruments Firms Association prescribed in Article 78(2), Financial Instruments Exchange, Self-Regulation Organization prescribed in Article 85(1), Financial Instruments Exchange Holding Company, Foreign Financial Instruments Exchange, Financial Instruments Clearing Organization, or Securities Finance Company, or a Financial Instruments Business Operator or Financial Instruments Intermediary Service Provider that has committed such act shall be punished by imprisonment with work for not more than two years or by a fine of not more than three million yen, or both:
第百九十八条の五 次の各号に掲げる違反があつた場合においては、その行為をした金融商品取引業者等、取引所取引許可業者、金融商品仲介業者、認可金融商品取引業協会若しくは第七十八条第二項に規定する公益法人金融商品取引業協会、金融商品取引所、第八十五条第一項に規定する自主規制法人、金融商品取引所持株会社、外国金融商品取引所、金融商品取引清算機関若しくは証券金融会社の代表者、代理人、使用人その他の従業者又は金融商品取引業者若しくは金融商品仲介業者は、二年以下の懲役若しくは三百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 201 In the case of act of violation set forth in any of the following items, a representative person, agent, employee or other worker of a Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc., person who obtained permission under Article 59, Authorized Transaction-at-Exchange Operator, Financial Instruments Intermediary Service Provider, Authorized Financial Instruments Firms Association, Financial Instruments Exchange, Self-Regulation Organization prescribed in Article 85(1), Financial Instruments Exchange Holding Company, Foreign Financial Instruments Exchange, or Securities Finance Company, or a Financial Instruments Business Operator or Financial Instruments Intermediary Service Provider that has committed such act shall be punished by imprisonment with work for not more than one year or by a fine of not more than one million yen, or both:
第二百一条 次の各号に掲げる違反があつた場合においては、その行為をした金融商品取引業者等、第五十九条の規定により許可を受けた者、取引所取引許可業者、金融商品仲介業者、認可金融商品取引業協会、金融商品取引所、第八十五条第一項に規定する自主規制法人、金融商品取引所持株会社、外国金融商品取引所若しくは証券金融会社の代表者、代理人、使用人その他の従業者又は金融商品取引業者若しくは金融商品仲介業者は、一年以下の懲役若しくは百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (iii) An officer (including a provisional director and a provisional auditor; the same shall apply in the following item) of a Member Commodity Exchange or an employee to whom authority has been delegated with regard to a certain kind of or specified matters concerning the business who, in inviting subscribers for the shares to be issued pursuant to the provisions of Article 129, has used a prospectus or an advertisement or other documents pertaining to said subscription which includes a false entry regarding an important matter or who has offered an Electromagnetic Record which includes a false entry regarding an important matter for carrying out affairs for said invitation for subscription in the case where an Electromagnetic Record has been created in lieu of the creation of said documents
三 第百二十九条の規定により発行する株式を引き受ける者の募集をするに当たり、目論見書、当該募集の広告その他の当該募集に関する文書であつて重要な事項について虚偽の記載のあるものを行使し、又は当該文書の作成に代えて電磁的記録の作成がされている場合における当該電磁的記録であつて重要な事項について虚偽の記録のあるものをその募集の事務の用に供した会員商品取引所の役員（仮理事及び仮監事を含む。次号において同じ。）又は事業に関するある種類若しくは特定の事項の委任を受けた使用人 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (ii) In cases where there is no Designated Dispute Resolution Organization: Complaint Processing Measures (meaning measures to have the person set forth in Article 52-73, paragraph (3), item (iii) provide advice or guidance to the employee or any other workers engaged in the business of processing complaints from the customers or any other measures specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as being equivalent thereto) and Dispute Resolution Measures (meaning measures seeking to resolve the dispute with the customer through Certified Dispute Resolution Procedures (meaning the Certified Dispute Resolution Procedures defined in Article 2, item (iii) of the Act on Promotion of Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (Act No. 151 of 2004)) or any other measures specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as being equivalent thereto) concerning Banking Services.
二 指定紛争解決機関が存在しない場合 銀行業務に関する苦情処理措置（顧客からの苦情の処理の業務に従事する使用人その他の従業者に対する助言若しくは指導を第五十二条の七十三第三項第三号に掲げる者に行わせること又はこれに準ずるものとして内閣府令で定める措置をいう。）及び紛争解決措置（顧客との紛争の解決を認証紛争解決手続（裁判外紛争解決手続の利用の促進に関する法律（平成十六年法律第百五十一号）第二条第三号に規定する認証紛争解決手続をいう。）により図ること又はこれに準ずるものとして内閣府令で定める措置をいう。） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - As I have repeatedly said, the SESC is an independent organization, so it is not under the chain of command under me. All the same, the FSA and the SESC will work together to further clarify facts related to this very regrettable case. The FSA and the SESC face the grave task of making every possible effort to prevent a recurrence without ruling out any option while maintaining close communications with the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, as this case relates to the private portion of employee pension plans, which have numerous members.
私は何回も言っていますように、この証券取引等監視委員会は独立性がございますから、私の指示・命令系統にはございませんけれども、やはり一緒になってさらなる事態の解明を進めて、極めて遺憾なことでございますが、あらゆる選択肢を排除することなく、関係官庁とも緊密に連絡しながら、これは厚生年金、いわゆる私的年金の部門でございますが、たくさんの方が私的年金に入っておられますので、そういった意味で、金融庁・証券取引等監視委員会、厚労省ともしっかり連絡をとりながら、総力を挙げて再発防止に努めていかねばならないという大変重たい課題でございます。 - 金融庁 - In relation to information management, you recently imposed a fine on and issued a business suspension order against a certified public accountant involved in an insider trading case. At the same time, an employee of a major securities company who allegedly provided insider information to the accountant was dismissed by the company. Under Article 51 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, the FSA may take an administrative action even in the absence of an illegal act if necessary to protect investors. Could you tell us what administrative action the FSA is planning to take against this major securities company?
その情報管理に関連することではありますが、先般、公認会計士のインサイダー取引に関連しまして、当該会計士に対して課徴金と業務停止の処分を出されたかと思います。これと同時に、インサイダー情報を会計士に提供していたとされる大手証券会社の社員も、懲戒解雇という処分を会社から出されました。金融商品取引法には、法令違反がなくても投資家保護の観点などから、必要な場合には行政処分を発動できるという第51条の規定がありますが、この大手証券会社に対する今後の行政対応を金融庁としてはどう考えていらっしゃるのか、伺えればと思います。 - 金融庁 - b) to the employee, in the case of inventions made by him, either in the course of his duties, or in the field of activity of the employer, through knowledge or use of technology or means specific to the employer, or information available on the premises of the employer, or again with material assistance from the employer, except where otherwise provided by the contract. Where the invention is the result of a research contract, unless otherwise provided, the right to the patent shall belong to the employer who commissioned the research, the inventor being entitled to additional remuneration specified in an additional clause of the contract.
(b) 発明が従業者によって行われ，それが同人の職務遂行の過程又は使用者の業務の範囲の何れかにおけるものであり，使用者固有の技術若しくは手段に関する知識若しくは使用，若しくは使用者の施設において利用可能な情報を通して，又は更に，使用者からの物質的な援助を得ている場合は，契約に別段の定めがあるときを除き，従業者発明が研究契約の成果である場合は，別段の定めがあるときを除き，特許を受ける権利はその研究を委託した使用者に属するものとし，発明者はその契約の追加規定に定める追加報酬を受けることができる。 - 特許庁 - (3) The Board of Appeal shall, on the basis of a written appeal or opposition, review the disputes related to the patents, trademarks, designs and topographies of semiconductor products. The composition of the Board of Appeal for the review of a specific matter shall be approved by the chair of the Board of Appeal, taking into account the nature of the case, competence of the members of the Board of Appeal and workload. Each appeal and opposition shall be reviewed by an uneven number of the members of the Board of Appeal, but not less than by three members, besides at least one of them shall be a lawyer and at least one of them shall be a specialist, which is not an employee of the Patent Office. If necessary, the Board of Appeal may invite independent experts for the provision of the opinion in the cases of disputes.
(3) 審判部は，審判請求書又は異議申立書に基づいて，特許，商標，意匠及び半導体製品の回路配置に関する紛争を審理する。特定の事項の審理のための審判部の構成は，事件の内容，審判部の構成委員の適性及び仕事量を考慮に入れて，審判部の審判長により承認されなければならない。何れの審判請求及び異議申立も，奇数の審判部構成員により審理されるものとするが，その人数は3以上とし，かつ，そのうちの少なくとも1は弁護士，また少なくとも1は特許庁の職員でない専門家でなければならない。審判部は，紛争事件において意見を徴するために，必要に応じて独立の専門家を招致することができる。 - 特許庁 - Consequently, the customer is able to grasp the current order state and articles can be provided in a fresh state; and the customer can order favorite articles with composure and the employee immediately answers to the customer's order.
飲食店において、客が商品入力手段により商品データを入力すると、商品データの入力により商品の種類を判定し、商品表示手段のうちの一つを選択して、商品表示手段に商品データを送り、商品データが商品表示手段に表示されると、従業員又はロボットは表示に従い商品を作成し、商品完成後、商品を取次ぎ部に載置する又は客に提供した後、作業完了ボタンを押すことによって、次の商品を商品表示手段に表示する商品の注文システムであり、自分の現在の注文状況が把握できること、商品が新鮮な状態で提供できること、客は自分の好きな商品を気兼ねなく注文でき、従業員は客の注文にすぐに対応できること等の効果がある。 - 特許庁 - Uji-shi planned to develop a medical examination system for babies by utilizing data in the basic resident register of which Uji-City was in charge. For this purpose, the development business was consigned by Uji-City to a private company, which further consigned the same to another company all the way down. Then, a part-time employee of the consignee (three-step consignments between Uji-City) made unauthorized copies of the data in the basic resident register and sold them to name-list distributors, who further resold them to other distributors. With respect to this matter, three inhabitants in Uji-City claimed that they had suffered mental damage due to the aforementioned leakage of data and filed an action against Uji-City with the Kyoto District Court, demanding compensation of damages for mental sufferings and attorney's fee. The Court finally ruled that Uji-City is liable for invasion of privacy rights and ordered Uji-City to pay 15,000 yen (10,000 yen as compensation for mental sufferings and 5,000 yen as attorney's fee) for each person.
宇治市がその管理に係る住民基本台帳のデータを使用して乳幼児検診システムを開発することを企図し、その開発業務を民間業者に委託したところ、再々委託先のアルバイトの従業員が上記データを不正にコピーしてこれを名簿販売業者に販売し、同業者が更に上記データを他に販売するなどをしたことに関して、宇治市の住民３人が、上記データの流出により精神的苦痛を被ったと主張して、宇治市に対し、損害賠償金（慰謝料及び弁護士費用）の支払を求めた事案において、プライバシー権侵害に基づく宇治市の不法行為責任を認め、損害賠償として１人当たり１万5000円（慰謝料１万円及び弁護士費用５０００円）の支払を命じた。 - 経済産業省 - (iii) An officer (including a provisional director and a provisional auditor; the same shall apply in the following item) of a Member Commodity Exchange or an employee to whom authority has been delegated with regard to a certain kind of or specified matters concerning the business who, in inviting subscribers for the shares of stock to be issued pursuant to the provisions of Article 129, has used a prospectus or an advertisement or other documents pertaining to said subscription which includes a false entry regarding an important matter or who has offered an Electromagnetic Record which includes a false entry regarding an important matter for carrying out affairs for said invitation for subscription in the case where an Electromagnetic Record has been created in lieu of the creation of said documents
三第百二十九条の規定により発行する株式を引き受ける者の募集をするに当たり、目論見書、当該募集の広告その他の当該募集に関する文書であつて重要な事項について虚偽の記載のあるものを行使し、又は当該文書の作成に代えて電磁的記録の作成がされている場合における当該電磁的記録であつて重要な事項について虚偽の記録のあるものをその募集の事務の用に供した会員商品取引所の役員（仮理事及び仮監事を含む。次号において同じ。）又は事業に関するある種類若しくは特定の事項の委任を受けた使用人 - 経済産業省 - (2) Pursuant to the provisions of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, the special provisions for taxation shall apply to the economic interests of an individual who is a director, executive officer or employee of a Certified Research and Development Business Operator or a Certified Supervisory Business Operator deriving from the acquisition of shares in the case where said individual has acquired shares of a foreign juridical person (limited to a foreign juridical person controlling said Certified Research and Development Business Operator or said Supervisory Business Operator as its Subsidiary or Other Similar Entity (meaning a company in which said foreign juridical person has the majority of the Voting Rights of All Shareholders or Others, or which is otherwise prescribed by an ordinance of the competent ministry as being a domestic company having a close relationship with said foreign juridical person)) by exercising share options given to him/her by said foreign juridical person.
２ 認定研究開発事業者又は認定統括事業者の取締役、執行役又は使用人である個人が、外国法人（当該認定研究開発事業者又は認定統括事業者を当該外国法人の子会社等（当該外国法人がその総株主等の議決権の過半数を保有していることその他の当該外国法人と密接な関係を有する国内の会社として主務省令で定める会社をいう。）とするものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）から与えられた新株予約権の行使により当該外国法人の株式の取得をした場合における当該株式の取得に係る経済的利益については、租税特別措置法で定めるところにより、課税の特例の適用があるものとする。 - 経済産業省 - When making comparisons between two widely separated points in time, attention needs to be paid to changes in demographic structure and the number of persons in work by size of employer. Nevertheless, it is worth noting a number of points in relation to factors such as the ratio of employer to employee incomes35) and the risk aversion analyzed below. These are that the increase in the proportion of people becoming self-employed proprietors is lower at relatively larger enterprises, that the difference between younger and middle-aged workers and older workers at enterprises with 100 or more workers was not as pronounced in 1987 as the difference between younger and middle-aged workers and older workers at enterprises with 99 or fewer workers, and that the proportion of young and middle-aged workers at enterprises with 10~99 workers was lower in 2002 and had come to resemble the trend regarding former employees of enterprises with 100 or more workers.
間隔が長期に開いた二時点間の比較を行う上では人口構成や規模別就業者数の変化に注意を払う必要が有るが、企業規模が相対的に大きいほど自営業主へ転職する者に占める割合は低いことや、1987年では従業者100人以上の企業規模における若・中年者と高齢者との差は、99人以下の企業規模における若・中年者と高齢者ほどの顕著なものではなかったこと、2002年には10人以上99人以下規模企業の若・中年転職者の占める割合が低下し100人以上の企業規模出身者と傾向が似たことは、事業者対被雇用者の収入比率35や次に分析するリスク回避志向等との関係で注目に値するのである。 - 経済産業省 - Hitachi has subjected itself to the corporate analysis with the use of the above-mentioned method because it has expectations that (i) since the Hitachi group is the aggregate of companies in diversified industry sectors, the individual and objective understanding of intellectual capital possessed by each business division would help reveal the strengths/weaknesses of each division and make it easier to cooperate cross-divisionally and to divide the roles between the administrative division (the head office function) and business divisions; (ii) the visualization of invisible intellectual capital, such as the morale of employees and brands, would induce each employee to become "aware" of problems the company and employees are faced with.
日立が上記のような手法を活用した企業分析を受けているのは、①日立グループが多様な業種の集合体であるため、各事業部の有する知的資本を個別・客観的に明らかにすることで、各事業部の強みや弱みが明らかになり、事業部間での連携や管理部門たるコーポレート（本社機能）と各事業部との役割分担が容易になること、また、②従業員のやる気やブランド等の目に見えない知的資本をできる限り可視化することで、会社や自分たちの抱える問題点についての「気づき」を従業員１人１人に誘発することが可能になること、という効果があるのではないかと期待しているからである。 - 経済産業省 - Article 34-23 (1) The provisions of Article 207 (excluding paragraph (9)(i)), Article 604(3), Article 620, Article 623(1), Articles 625 to 636 inclusive, Article 660, Article 661 and Article 665 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to limited liability audit corporations. In this case, the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Cabinet Office Ordinance," the phrase "the matters listed in Article 199(1)(iii)" in Article 207(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "property other than money as the object of capital contribution," the phrase "provided for in that item" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "other than money," the phrase "provided for in Article 199(1)(iii)" in paragraph (7) and paragraph (9)(ii) to (v) inclusive of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "of property other than money," the term "subscriber for Shares for Subscription" in paragraph (8) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who intends to become a partner," the phrase "his/her applications for subscription for Shares for Subscription, or his/her manifestation of intention relating to the contract provided for in Article 205" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "his/her offer for capital contribution," the phrase "director, an accounting advisor, a company auditor or executive officer," in paragraph (10)(i) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "partner," the phrase "employee including a manager" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "employee," the term "subscriber for Shares for Subscription" in item (ii) of the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who intends to become a partner," the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 604(3) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34-22(1) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," the term "business year" in Article 631(1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "fiscal year," the term "Article 624(1)" in Article 632(1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 624(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34-22(1) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," the phrase "a demand is made under the provisions of the first sentence of Article 624(1)" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "a demand is made under the provisions of the first sentence of Article 624(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34-22(1) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," and the phrase "the demand under the first sentence of Article 624(1)" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the demand under the first sentence of Article 624(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34-22(1) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order.
第三十四条の二十三 会社法第二百七条（第九項第一号を除く。）、第六百四条第三項、第六百二十条、第六百二十三条第一項、第六百二十五条から第六百三十六条まで、第六百六十条、第六百六十一条及び第六百六十五条の規定は、有限責任監査法人について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「法務省令」とあるのは「内閣府令」と、同法第二百七条第一項中「第百九十九条第一項第三号に掲げる事項を」とあるのは「金銭以外の財産を出資の目的として」と、「同号」とあるのは「当該金銭以外」と、同条第七項及び第九項第二号から第五号までの規定中「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「金銭以外の財産」と、同条第八項中「募集株式の引受人」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、「その募集株式の引受けの申込み又は第二百五条の契約に係る意思表示」とあるのは「出資の申込み」と、同条第十項第一号中「取締役、会計参与、監査役若しくは執行役」とあるのは「社員」と、「支配人その他の使用人」とあるのは「使用人」と、同項第二号中「募集株式の引受人」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六百四条第三項中「前項」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の二十二第一項において準用する前項」と、同法第六百三十一条第一項中「事業年度」とあるのは「会計年度」と、同法第六百三十二条第一項中「第六百二十四条第一項」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の二十二第一項において準用する第六百二十四条第一項」と、同条第二項中「が、第六百二十四条第一項前段」とあるのは「が、公認会計士法第三十四条の二十二第一項において準用する第六百二十四条第一項前段」と、「は、第六百二十四条第一項前段」とあるのは「は、同法第三十四条の二十二第一項において準用する第六百二十四条第一項前段」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (8) The provisions of paragraphs 3 through 5 above shall apply mutatis mutandis to leave taken by an employee prescribed in Article 4 paragraph 1 of the Local Public Service Act (Act No. 261 of 1950) (excluding part-time personnel who do not hold an official post with short working hours prescribed in Article 28-5 paragraph 1 of the same Act, the same shall apply hereinafter in this Article), for the purpose of taking care of his/her Family Member in Care-requiring Condition. In this case, the term "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries or a person to whom the Minister, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, delegates the authority prescribed in Article 4 of the Special Wage Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, etc.")" in paragraph 3 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6 paragraph 1 of the Local Public Service Act (Act No. 261 of 1950) (or the municipal board of education with regard to the educational personnel whose wages are paid by a prefectural government prescribed in Article 37 paragraph 1 of the Act on the Organization and Operation of Local Educational Administration (Act No. 162 of 1956), the same shall apply hereinafter)"; and the term "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, etc." in paragraph 5 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6 paragraph 1 of the Local Public Service Act."
８ 第三項から第五項までの規定は、地方公務員法（昭和二十五年法律第二百六十一号）第四条第一項に規定する職員（同法第二十八条の五第一項に規定する短時間勤務の職を占める職員以外の非常勤職員を除く。以下この条において同じ。）がその要介護家族の介護をするための休業について準用する。この場合において、第三項中「給特法第四条に規定する農林水産大臣又は政令の定めるところによりその委任を受けた者（以下「農林水産大臣等」という。）」とあるのは「地方公務員法（昭和二十五年法律第二百六十一号）第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者（地方教育行政の組織及び運営に関する法律（昭和三十一年法律第百六十二号）第三十七条第一項に規定する県費負担教職員については、市町村の教育委員会。以下同じ。）」と、第五項中「農林水産大臣等」とあるのは「地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 8 (1) A director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties and company auditor of an Insurance Company shall not concurrently serve as the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties or company auditor (including director, auditor or any other equivalent person) or employee of a bank (meaning a bank prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1) (Definitions, etc.) of the Banking Act (Act No. 59 of 1981); the same shall apply hereinafter) or any other financial institution specified by a Cabinet Order, or a Financial Instruments Business Operator prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (9) (Definitions) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948) (limited to an operator that engages in a securities-related business (referring to any of the securities-related businesses prescribed in Article 28, paragraph (8) (Definitions) of the same Act); the same shall apply hereinafter), if such institution or operator is deemed as a specified person concerned (referring to a person that has a special relationship as specified by a Cabinet Order with the Insurance Company, such as a Subsidiary Company of the Insurance Company or a Subsidiary Company of the Insurance Holding Company of which the Insurance Company is a Subsidiary Company (excluding said Insurance Company).
第八条 保険会社の取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員及び監査役は、特定関係者（当該保険会社の子会社、当該保険会社を子会社とする保険持株会社の子会社（当該保険会社を除く。）その他の当該保険会社と政令で定める特殊の関係のある者をいう。）に該当する銀行（銀行法（昭和五十六年法律第五十九号）第二条第一項（定義等）に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）その他の政令で定める金融機関又は金融商品取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）第二条第九項（定義）に規定する金融商品取引業者（有価証券関連業（同法第二十八条第八項（定義）に規定する有価証券関連業をいう。以下同じ。）を行う者に限る。）の取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員若しくは監査役（理事、監事その他これらに準ずる者を含む。）又は使用人を兼ねてはならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (4) When an insurance administrator, director, accounting advisor, company auditor or executive officer of a Stock Company, an acting director, company auditor or executive officer of a Stock Company who has been appointed pursuant to the provisional disposition order prescribed in Article 56 of the Civil Provisional Relief Act, any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary director, accounting advisor, company auditor, representative director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer who has been appointed pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (2), Article 351, paragraph (2), or Article 401, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 403, paragraph (3) and Article 420, paragraph (3) of that Act) or manager or an employee who has been entrusted with a type of or specific matter concerning its other operations, in soliciting the funds prescribed in Article 78, paragraph (1), in the case of an Entity Conversion from a Stock Company into a Mutual Company, has used an advertisement or other documents relating to the subscription of funds which contain a false statement regarding a material matter, or has offered an electromagnetic record which contains a false statement regarding a material matter for carrying out affairs for said solicitation for subscription in the case where an electromagnetic record has been created in lieu of the creation of said documents, the same punishment as in paragraph (1) shall apply.
４ 株式会社が相互会社となる組織変更をする場合において、株式会社の保険管理人、取締役、会計参与、監査役、執行役、民事保全法第五十六条に規定する仮処分命令により選任された株式会社の取締役、監査役若しくは執行役の職務を代行する者、会社法第三百四十六条第二項、第三百五十一条第二項若しくは第四百一条第三項（同法第四百三条第三項及び第四百二十条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により選任された一時取締役、会計参与、監査役、代表取締役、委員、執行役若しくは代表執行役の職務を行うべき者又は支配人その他営業に関するある種類若しくは特定の事項の委任を受けた使用人が、第七十八条第一項の規定による基金の募集に当たり、基金の募集の広告その他基金の募集に関する文書であって重要な事項について虚偽の記載のあるものを行使し、又はこれらの書類の作成に代えて電磁的記録の作成がされている場合における当該電磁的記録であって重要な事項について虚偽の記録のあるものをその募集の事務の用に供したときも、第一項と同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 115-25 (1) A mayor of a Municipality, when it is determined that a Designated Provider of Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care does not meet the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the Article 115-22, paragraph (1) or fixed minimum number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph with regard to knowledge, skill, or employee of the Business Office pertaining to said appointment as service provider, or does not operate an appropriate business of Designated Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care in accordance with standards concerning effective support methods for Prevention of Long-Term Care pertaining to Designated Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care and standards concerning management of the business of Designated Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care prescribed in paragraph (2) of the same Article, may specify a due date and recommend to said Designated Provider of Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care to comply with the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in paragraph (1) of the same Article, to employ the fixed minimum number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph, to comply with standards concerning effective support methods for Prevention of Long-Term Care pertaining to Designated Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care and standards concerning management of the business of Designated Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care as prescribed in paragraph (2) of the same Article.
第百十五条の二十五 市町村長は、指定介護予防支援事業者が、当該指定に係る事業所の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第百十五条の二十二第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数を満たしておらず、又は同条第二項に規定する指定介護予防支援に係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定介護予防支援の事業の運営に関する基準に従って適正な指定介護予防支援の事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定介護予防支援事業者に対し、期限を定めて、同条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数の従業者を有し、又は同条第二項に規定する指定介護予防支援に係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定介護予防支援の事業の運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 78-8 (1) The mayor of a Municipality, when it is determined that a Designated Community-Based Service Provider does not act in compliance with the provision provided when providing said appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 78-2, paragraph (7), that does not meet the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the Article 78-4, paragraph (1) or fixed number as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph, or standards concerning employees that engage in Designated Community-Based Service provided by paragraph (4) of the same Article, with regard to knowledge, skill, or number of employee of the Business Office pertaining to said appointment as service provider, or when it is determined that said Designated Community-Based Service Provider does not operate an appropriate Designated Community-Based Service in accordance with the standards concerning Facilities and Management of a Designated Community-Based Service Business provided by paragraph (2) or paragraph (4) of the same Article, may specify a due date and recommend to said Designated Community-Based Service Provider to act in compliance with the provisions provided when determining said appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 78-2, paragraph (7), to comply with the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in Article 78-4, paragraph (1), to employ the number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph, to comply with standards concerning employees that engage in Designated Community-Based Service as prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, and to comply with standards concerning Facilities and Management of a Designated Community-Based Service Business as prescribed by paragraph (2) or paragraph (4) of the same Article.
第七十八条の八 市町村長は、指定地域密着型サービス事業者が、第七十八条の二第七項の規定により当該指定を行うに当たって付された条件に従わず、当該指定に係る事業所の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第七十八条の四第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数若しくは同条第四項に規定する指定地域密着型サービスに従事する従業者に関する基準を満たしておらず、又は同条第二項若しくは第四項に規定する指定地域密着型サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準に従って適正な指定地域密着型サービスの事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定地域密着型サービス事業者に対し、期限を定めて、第七十八条の二第七項の規定により当該指定を行うに当たって付された条件に従い、第七十八条の四第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数の従業者を有し、若しくは同条第四項に規定する指定地域密着型サービスに従事する従業者に関する基準を遵守し、又は同条第二項若しくは第四項に規定する指定地域密着型サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) The provision of the first sentence of the preceding paragraph shall also apply where a representative person, agent, employee or other worker (hereinafter referred to as a "representative person, etc." in this paragraph and paragraph (4)) of a person set forth in items (ii) to (v) of Article 40(1) or person who was a person set forth in these items, or of a person listed in each item of Article 230(1) (excluding an heir) or person who was a person set forth in item (ii) or (iii) of Article 230(1) (excluding an heir), or of a person set forth in each of the items of Article 244-6(1) or person who was a person set forth in these items (each of such persons shall hereinafter be referred to as a "person under duty of explanation" in this paragraph), in connection with the business of the person under duty of explanation, in violation of the provisions of Article 40(1) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of said Article), Article 230(1) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of said Article) or Article 244-6(1) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of said Article), has refused to give an explanation or given a false explanation. The same shall apply where a representative person, etc. of a person under duty of explanation, in connection with the business of the person under duty of explanation, in violation of the provision of Article 40(1) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of said Article) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 96(1), has refused to give an explanation or given a false explanation.
２ 第四十条第一項第二号から第五号までに掲げる者若しくは当該各号に掲げる者であった者、第二百三十条第一項各号に掲げる者（相続人を除く。）若しくは同項第二号若しくは第三号に掲げる者（相続人を除く。）であった者又は第二百四十四条の六第一項各号に掲げる者若しくは同項各号に掲げる者であった者（以下この項において「説明義務者」という。）の代表者、代理人、使用人その他の従業者（以下この項及び第四項において「代表者等」という。）が、その説明義務者の業務に関し、第四十条第一項（同条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二百三十条第一項（同条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）又は第二百四十四条の六第一項（同条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定に違反して、説明を拒み、又は虚偽の説明をしたときも、前項前段と同様とする。説明義務者の代表者等が、その説明義務者の業務に関し、第九十六条第一項において準用する第四十条第一項（同条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定に違反して、説明を拒み、又は虚偽の説明をしたときも、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 2 (1) The term "Whistleblowing" as used in this Act shall mean whistleblowing made by a worker (which shall mean worker as provided for in Article 9 of the Labor Standards Act (Act No. 49 of 1947); the same shall apply hereinafter), without a purpose of obtaining an wrongful gain, a purpose of causing damages to others, or any other wrongful purpose, about Reportable Fact that has been occurred, is being occurred or is about to be occurred by "Business Operator" (which shall mean any of the following business operators (which shall mean juridical person, other organization and individual who operates a business)), or such persons as officer, employee or agent in the workplace where the worker is occupied in performing the Business Operator's business activities, to the said Business Operator or the person designated by the said Business Operator in advance (hereinafter referred to as "Business Operator, etc."), to an Administrative Organ with the authority to impose disposition (which shall mean an order, rescission, and other acts involving the exercise of public authority; the same shall apply hereinafter) or recommendation, etc. (which shall mean a recommendation and other acts which are not disposition; the same shall apply hereinafter) upon the said Reportable Fact, or to any person who are recognized to be necessary to do whistleblowing to the said Reportable Fact in order to prevent the occurrence thereof or the spread of damage caused thereby (including person who suffers or might suffer damage from the said Reportable Fact, but excluding any person who might cause damages to the competitive position or any other legitimate interests of the Business Operator; the same shall apply in Item (iii) of the following Article.).
第二条 この法律において「公益通報」とは、労働者（労働基準法（昭和二十二年法律第四十九号）第九条に規定する労働者をいう。以下同じ。）が、不正の利益を得る目的、他人に損害を加える目的その他の不正の目的でなく、その労務提供先（次のいずれかに掲げる事業者（法人その他の団体及び事業を行う個人をいう。以下同じ。）をいう。以下同じ。）又は当該労務提供先の事業に従事する場合におけるその役員、従業員、代理人その他の者について通報対象事実が生じ、又はまさに生じようとしている旨を、当該労務提供先若しくは当該労務提供先があらかじめ定めた者（以下「労務提供先等」という。）、当該通報対象事実について処分（命令、取消しその他公権力の行使に当たる行為をいう。以下同じ。）若しくは勧告等（勧告その他処分に当たらない行為をいう。以下同じ。）をする権限を有する行政機関又はその者に対し当該通報対象事実を通報することがその発生若しくはこれによる被害の拡大を防止するために必要であると認められる者（当該通報対象事実により被害を受け又は受けるおそれがある者を含み、当該労務提供先の競争上の地位その他正当な利益を害するおそれがある者を除く。次条第三号において同じ。）に通報することをいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 108-4 A registered employee organization may become a juridical person by notifying the National Personnel Authority to this effect. The provisions of the Civil Code (Act No. 89 of 1896) and of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act (Act No.14 of 1898) concerning juridical persons as provided for in Article 34 of the Civil Code (except for Article 35, paragraph 2 of Article 38, Article 56, Article 67, Article 71, paragraph 3 of Article 77, Article 84, Article 84-2 and paragraph 1, item 4 of and paragraph 2 of Article 84-3 of the Civil Code, and Article 122-2 of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the juridical person referred to in this Article. In this case, the term "the competent government agency" and the term "articles of incorporation" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "the National Personnel Authority" and "the constitution" respectively, and, further, the term "permission for incorporation" in paragraph 1, item 4 of Article 46 of the Civil Code, the term "permission for incorporation" in paragraph 1, item 4 of Article 68 of the Civil Code, the term "decision on commencement of bankruptcy proceedings and rescission of permission for incorporation" in paragraph 1 of Article 77 of the Civil Code, and the term "permit" in Article 120 of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "notifying of its incorporation as a juridical person," "registration," "decision on commencement of bankruptcy proceedings" and "certificate of acceptance of notifying of incorporation as a juridical person," respectively.
第百八条の四 登録された職員団体は、法人となる旨を人事院に申し出ることにより法人となることができる。民法（明治二十九年法律第八十九号）及び非訟事件手続法（明治三十一年法律第十四号）中民法第三十四条に規定する法人に関する規定（同法第三十五条、第三十八条第二項、第五十六条、第六十七条、第七十一条、第七十七条第三項、第八十四条、第八十四条の二並びに第八十四条の三第一項第四号及び第二項並びに非訟事件手続法第百二十二条ノ二を除く。）は、本条の法人について準用する。この場合においては、これらの規定中「主務官庁」とあるのは「人事院」と、「定款」とあるのは「規約」と読み替えるほか、民法第四十六条第一項第四号中「設立の許可」とあるのは「法人となる旨の申出」と、同法第六十八条第一項第四号中「設立の許可」とあるのは「登録」と、同法第七十七条第一項中「破産手続開始の決定及び設立の許可の取消し」とあるのは「破産手続開始の決定」と、非訟事件手続法第百二十条中「許可書」とあるのは「法人ト為ル旨ノ申出ノ受理証明書」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 199 In the case of failure to make a report or submit materials under Article 75, Article 79-4, Article 106-27, Article 151 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 153-4), Article 155-9, Article 156-15, or Article 156-34, or making a false report or submitting false materials, a representative person, agent, employee, other worker, or a person who received entrustment of business of an Authorized Financial Instruments Firms Association, Public Interest Corporation-Type Financial Instruments Firms Association prescribed in Article 78(2), Financial Instruments Exchange, Self-Regulation Organization prescribed in Article 85(1), Financial Instruments Exchange Holding Company, Foreign Financial Instruments Exchange, Financial Instruments Clearing Organization, Securities Finance Company, Subsidiary Company of Financial Instruments Exchange (meaning Subsidiary Companies prescribed in Article 87-3(2)), Subsidiary Company of Financial Instruments Exchange Holding Company(meaning Subsidiary Companies prescribed in Article 106-10(1)), Issuer of Securities listed in a Financial Instruments Exchange or Over-the-Counter Traded Securities, or Participants of Foreign Financial Instruments Exchange that has committed such act shall be punished by imprisonment with work for not more than one year or by a fine of not more than three million yen, or both.
第百九十九条 第七十五条、第七十九条の四、第百六条の二十七、第百五十一条（第百五十三条の四において準用する場合を含む。）、第百五十五条の九、第百五十六条の十五又は第百五十六条の三十四の規定による報告若しくは資料を提出せず、又は虚偽の報告若しくは資料を提出した場合においては、その行為をした認可金融商品取引業協会若しくは第七十八条第二項に規定する公益法人金融商品取引業協会、金融商品取引所、第八十五条第一項に規定する自主規制法人、金融商品取引所持株会社、外国金融商品取引所、金融商品取引清算機関、証券金融会社、金融商品取引所の子会社（第八十七条の三第二項に規定する子会社をいう。）、金融商品取引所持株会社の子会社（第百六条の十第一項に規定する子会社をいう。）、金融商品取引所に上場されている有価証券若しくは店頭売買有価証券の発行者又は外国金融商品取引所の外国金融商品取引所参加者の代表者、代理人、使用人その他の従業者若しくは業務の委託を受けた者は、一年以下の懲役若しくは三百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) Each member of the Advisory Board shall be an officer or employee of a Limited Partner who is nominated by the Limited Partner (or if the Limited Partner is an individual, the Limited Partner) that has an initial Capital Commitment in the amount of [__] yen or more. If there are any justifiable grounds, the General Partner may (i) refuse to appoint a person nominated by a Limited Partner as a member of the Advisory Board or (ii) dismiss any member of the Advisory Board; provided that in the case of (ii) above, the General Partner shall give to all the other members of the Advisory Board a prior written notice of its intention to dismiss such member and, if [___]% or more of such other members disagree on the dismissal within [__] days after the receipt of such notice by such other members, the member shall not be dismissed. If a member of the Advisory Board resigns, is dismissed or dies, only the Limited Partner who nominated such member may nominate a successor member. If a Limited Partner becomes a Defaulting Limited Partner, such Limited Partner will lose the right to nominate a member of the Advisory Board and the member nominated by such Limited Partner shall automatically be deemed to be dismissed. The members of the Advisory Board as of the Effective Date shall be those listed in Exhibit [__] attached hereto.
3. 諮問委員会の委員は、当初の出資約束金額が金［ ］円以上である有限責任組合員が指名する自己の役員又は従業員とする（当該有限責任組合員が個人の場合には当該有限責任組合員とする。）。無限責任組合員は、正当な理由がある場合、(ⅰ)当該有限責任組合員が指名した者が諮問委員会の委員に就任することを拒否することができ、また、(ⅱ)諮問委員会の委員を解任することができる。但し、(ⅱ)の場合には、無限責任組合員は、他の全ての諮問委員会の委員に対して解任を行う意思があることを事前に書面により通知するものとし、当該通知の到達の日から［ ］日以内に、かかる解任につき当該他の委員の［ ］分の［ ］以上の反対があった場合には、かかる解任は行われないものとする。諮問委員会の委員が辞任し若しくは解任され又は死亡した場合、当該委員を指名した有限責任組合員のみが後任の委員を指名することができる。有限責任組合員が不履行有限責任組合員となった場合、当該有限責任組合員は諮問委員会の委員を指名する権利を失い、当該有限責任組合員が指名した委員は当然に解任されたものとみなす。なお、効力発生日における諮問委員会の委員は、本契約添付別紙［ ］に記載の者とする。 - 経済産業省 - (2) When an official leaves government position, upon the request of an appointer to be a national public servant in the special service, a local public officer, or an employee of a public financial corporation as provided for in Article 1 of the Act on Budget and Settlement of Public Financial Corporations (Act No. 99 of 1951), or any other juridical person provided for by rules of the National Personnel Authority among those whose business is related closely to national affairs or undertakings (hereinafter referred to as "a national public servant in the special service, etc." in this paragraph), and then, after holding office without interruption as a national public servant in the special service, etc., is employed without interruption as an official on premise of the said leaving of government position (including the case of an official who holds one or more offices without interruption as a national public servant in the special service, etc. after holding another office as a national public servant in the special service, etc., and then is employed as an official on the premise of the said leaving of government position), in the cases where, during the continuous period of holding office as an official up to the said leaving of government position (in the case of an official who leaves government position similarly (hereinafter referred to as "the previous leaving of government position" in this paragraph) before the said leaving of government position, holds office as a national public servant in the special service, etc., and is employed as an official, including the continuous period of holding office as an official up to the previous leaving of government position, hereinafter referred to as "the period of holding office before leaving of government position responding to the request" in this paragraph), he/she falls under any of the items in the preceding paragraph, any of the disciplinary actions provided for in the same paragraph may be taken. When an official who is employed pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 of Article 81-4 or paragraph 1 of Article 81-5 falls under any of the items of the preceding paragraph during the continuous period of holding office as an official up to the day when he/she has become a person who has mandatorily retired, etc. (including the period of holding office before leaving of government position responding to the request), or the period that he/she has held office as an official after the employment pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 of Article 81-4 or paragraph 1 of Article 81-5, the same shall apply as well.
２ 職員が、任命権者の要請に応じ特別職に属する国家公務員、地方公務員又は公庫の予算及び決算に関する法律（昭和二十六年法律第九十九号）第一条に規定する公庫その他その業務が国の事務若しくは事業と密接な関連を有する法人のうち人事院規則で定めるものに使用される者（以下この項において「特別職国家公務員等」という。）となるため退職し、引き続き特別職国家公務員等として在職した後、引き続いて当該退職を前提として職員として採用された場合（一の特別職国家公務員等として在職した後、引き続き一以上の特別職国家公務員等として在職し、引き続いて当該退職を前提として職員として採用された場合を含む。）において、当該退職までの引き続く職員としての在職期間（当該退職前に同様の退職（以下この項において「先の退職」という。）、特別職国家公務員等としての在職及び職員としての採用がある場合には、当該先の退職までの引き続く職員としての在職期間を含む。以下この項において「要請に応じた退職前の在職期間」という。）中に前項各号のいずれかに該当したときは、これに対し同項に規定する懲戒処分を行うことができる。職員が、第八十一条の四第一項又は第八十一条の五第一項の規定により採用された場合において、定年退職者等となつた日までの引き続く職員としての在職期間（要請に応じた退職前の在職期間を含む。）又は第八十一条の四第一項若しくは第八十一条の五第一項の規定によりかつて採用されて職員として在職していた期間中に前項各号のいずれかに該当したときも、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 300-2 The provision of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will be Deemed to be a Customer Other than Professional Investor) and Article 34-3, paragraphs (5) and (6) (Cases Where a Juridical Person who Is a Customer Other Than Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investor) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provision) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified insurance contract (meaning an insurance contract specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as entailing the risk of loss due to any change in interest rates, currency values, financial instruments market prices as set forth in Article 2, paragraph (14) of that Act or any other indicator (meaning the risk that the total amount of insurance premiums to be paid by the customer following the conclusion of the insurance contract may exceed the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits to be paid out to the customer following the conclusion of the contract); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) effected by an Insurance Company, etc. or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or a contract stipulating any specific act as an intermediary for the benefit of a customer in concluding a specified insurance contract; the provision of Section 2, Subsection 1 of the same Chapter (excluding Article 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business for Persons Who Engage in Type 1 Financial Instruments Transaction Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name-Lending and Prohibition of Administration of Company Bonds, etc.), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Document Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6 (Cancellation by a Written Statement), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso of Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Loss Compensation, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy, etc.), and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured) (General Rules)) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified insurance contract by an Insurance Company, etc., Foreign Insurance Company, etc., Insurance Solicitor or Insurance Broker and related act as an agent or intermediary. In this case, the terms "financial instruments transaction contract" and "financial instruments transaction business" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified insurance contract, etc.," and "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract, or any related act as an agent or intermediary," respectively; in Article 34 of that Act, the term "contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in the items of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effecting a specified insurance contract (meaning a specified insurance contract provided in Article 300-2 of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) or acting as an intermediary for the benefit of a customer in concluding a specified insurance contract"; in Article 37, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "carrying out Financial Instruments and Exchange Activities" shall be deemed to be replaced with "concluding specified insurance contracts"; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "when it intends to conclude a financial instruments transaction contract" shall be deemed to be replaced with "when it intends to conclude a financial instruments transaction contract or acts as an agent or intermediary in concluding a specified insurance contract" and the term "the following matters" with "the following matters and any other important matter stipulated by an insurance contract provided in Article 300, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act"; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act, the term "Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Company, etc. (meaning an Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (meaning a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (7) of that Act) or Insurance Broker (meaning an Insurance Broker as defined in paragraph (25) of the same Article) concluding a specified insurance contract, etc."; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (v) of that Act, the term "financial instruments transaction business carried out" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified insurance contract concluded"; in Article 38, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "employee" shall be deemed to be replaced with "employee (excluding an Insurance Solicitor as defined in Article 2, paragraph (23) of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply in Article 39, paragraph (3))"; in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act, the term "sales and purchase and any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by a Cabinet Order) or of Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract", the term "securities or derivative transaction (hereinafter referred to as "securities, etc." in this Article)" with "specified insurance contract," the term "customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including said person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" with "the customer," the term "loss" with "loss (meaning, where the total amount of insurance premiums to be paid by the customer following the conclusion of the specified insurance contract exceeds the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits to be paid out to the customer following the conclusion of the contract, the total amount of premium payment subtracted by the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," and the term "to supplement" with "to supplement, outside the stipulations of the specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act, the term "securities sales transaction, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract," the term "securities, etc." with "specified insurance contract," and the term "to add to" with "to add to, outside the stipulations of the specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "securities sales transaction, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act, the term "determined by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause" shall be deemed to be replaced with "a potential cause"; in Article 40, item (i) of that Act, the term "financial instruments transaction business" with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract, etc."; in Article 45, item (ii) of that Act, the term "Article 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2, paragraph (4) and Article 43-4" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Articles 37-3 (as far as any of the matters listed in the items of Article 37-3, paragraph (1) is concerned, excluding Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3)) and 37-4"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
第三百条の二 金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで（特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合）並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項（特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合）を除く。）（特定投資家）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は保険会社等若しくは外国保険会社等又は保険仲立人が行う特定保険契約（金利、通貨の価格、同法第二条第十四項に規定する金融商品市場における相場その他の指標に係る変動により損失が生ずるおそれ（当該保険契約が締結されることにより顧客の支払うこととなる保険料の合計額が、当該保険契約が締結されることにより当該顧客の取得することとなる保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を上回ることとなるおそれをいう。）がある保険契約として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）又は顧客のために特定保険契約の締結の媒介を行うことを内容とする契約の締結について、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六（書面による解除）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条の二（最良執行方針等）並びに第四十条の三（分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止）を除く。）（通則）の規定は保険会社等、外国保険会社等、保険募集人又は保険仲立人が行う特定保険契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定保険契約等」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介の業務」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約（保険業法第三百条の二に規定する特定保険契約をいう。以下同じ。）又は顧客のために特定保険契約の締結の媒介」と、同法第三十七条第二項中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「締結しようとするとき、又は特定保険契約の締結の代理若しくは媒介を行うとき」と、「次に掲げる事項」とあるのは「次に掲げる事項その他保険業法第三百条第一項第一号に規定する保険契約の契約条項のうち重要な事項」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「特定保険契約等を締結する保険会社等（保険業法第二条の二第一項に規定する保険会社等をいう。）、外国保険会社等（同法第二条第七項に規定する外国保険会社等をいう。）又は保険仲立人（同条第二十五項に規定する保険仲立人をいう。）」と、同項第五号中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同法第三十八条第一項中「使用人」とあるのは「使用人（保険募集人（保険業法第二条第二十三項に規定する保険募集人をいう。）を除く。第三十九条第三項において同じ。）」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「損失」とあるのは「損失（当該特定保険契約が締結されることにより顧客の支払う保険料の合計額が当該特定保険契約が締結されることにより当該顧客の取得する保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を上回る場合における当該保険料の合計額から当該保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を控除した金額をいう。以下この条において同じ。）」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定保険契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十条第一号中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約等の締結」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項各号に掲げる事項に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）及び第三十七条の四」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 8-3 The provisions of paragraphs 1, 3 to 5 inclusive, 7 to 13 inclusive, 17, 18 and 21 of Article 7-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an act is committed in violation of the provisions of item 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 8 (limited to cases of committing an act which falls under unreasonable restraint of trade) or item 2 thereof (limited to cases of entering into an international agreement or an international contract which contains such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade). In this case, in paragraph 1 of Article 7-2, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade association"; and the term "order the said entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "order the constituent entrepreneur of the said trade association (including the relevant entrepreneur when an officer, employee, agent, or any other person acting for the benefit of an entrepreneur is a constituent entrepreneur; hereinafter referred to as "specified entrepreneur" in this Article)"; in paragraph 4 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 5 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "had discontinued the business activities that constituted the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation of the business activities that constituted the relevant violation is less than two years)"; in paragraph 7 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 8 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 9 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneur that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; and the term " has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraphs 10 and 11 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 12 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "committed by the relevant entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "committed by the relevant trade association"; the term "commit the violation provided for in paragraph 1" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effect the business activities that constituted the relevant violation"; and the term "discontinuing" shall be deemed to be replaced with "discontinuing the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 13 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; and the term "violation committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "report submitted pursuant to the provisions of item 1 of the same paragraph"; and in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the said Article, the term "paragraphs 1, 4 to 6 inclusive, 8, 9, and 14" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 8, and 9".
第八条の三 第七条の二第一項、第三項から第五項まで、第七項から第十三項まで、第十七項、第十八項及び第二十一項の規定は、第八条第一項第一号（不当な取引制限に相当する行為をする場合に限る。）又は第二号（不当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定又は国際的契約をする場合に限る。）の規定に違反する行為が行われた場合に準用する。この場合において、第七条の二第一項中「事業者が」とあるのは「事業者団体が」と、「当該事業者に対し」とあるのは「当該事業者団体の構成事業者（事業者の利益のためにする行為を行う役員、従業員、代理人その他の者が構成事業者である場合には、当該事業者を含む。以下この条において「特定事業者」という。）に対し」と、同条第四項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、同条第五項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「をやめた者（次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめた者（当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動」と、同条第七項中「納付すべき事業者」とあるのは「納付すべき特定事業者」と、「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第八項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第九項中「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第十項及び第十一項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、同条第十二項中「行つた事業者」とあるのは「行つた特定事業者」と、「当該事業者が行つた」とあるのは「当該特定事業者が行つた」と、「、当該事業者」とあるのは「、当該特定事業者」と、「当該事業者がした」とあるのは「当該事業者団体がした」と、「他の事業者」とあるのは「他の特定事業者」と、「第一項に規定する違反行為をする」とあるのは「当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動を行う」と、「をやめる」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめる」と、同条第十三項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、「した違反行為」とあるのは「行つた同項第一号の規定による報告」と、同条第十七項及び第十八項中「第四項から第六項まで、第八項、第九項又は第十四項」とあるのは「第四項、第五項、第八項又は第九項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) The provisions of Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii) and paragraph (2) (Restriction on Insurance Solicitation) of the Insurance Business Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the solicitation of mutual aid contracts of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities; the provisions of Article 283 (Liability for Compensation of the Insurance Company Concerned, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the solicitation of mutual aid contracts of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities carried out by officers or employees of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, and by any mutual aid agent (which means a person who acts as an agent or intermediary in concluding mutual aid contracts for a cooperative under entrustment by said cooperative, and who is not an officer nor an employee of said cooperative; the same shall apply hereinafter) of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities and officers or employees of said mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 294 (Explanations to Customers) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to officers and employees of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, any mutual aid agent of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, and officers and employees of said mutual aid agent, carrying out solicitation of mutual aid contracts; the provisions of Article 295 (Prohibition of Self-Contract) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 300 (Prohibited Acts) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities and any mutual aid agent thereof (including their officers and employees) carrying out mutual aid activities; the provisions of Article 305 (On-Site Inspections, etc.), Article 306 (Order to Improve Business Operations), and Article 307, paragraph (1), item (iii) (Rescission of Registration, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 309 (Revocation of Applications for Insurance Contracts, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the revocation or cancellation of an offer for a mutual aid contract by a person who has filed an offer with a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities or by a mutual aid contractor; and the provisions of Article 311 (Carrying and Presenting of Identification Cards by Inspection Officials) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to officials who enter, question, and inspect pursuant to the provisions of Article 305 of the same Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "Cabinet Office Ordinance" in Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii), Article 294, item (iii), Article 295, paragraph (2), Article 300, paragraph (1), item (vii) and item (ix), and Article 309, paragraph (1), item (i), paragraph (2), paragraph (3), paragraph (5) and paragraph (6) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "ordinance of the competent ministry"; the phrase "a casualty insurance company (including a foreign casualty insurance company, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Part)" in Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii), and paragraph (2) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities"; the phrase "a casualty insurance agent registered under the following Article" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "a mutual aid agent notified under Article 106-3, item (i) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "which is a casualty insurance agent" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "which is a mutual aid agent"; the phrase "by obtaining registration under the following Article or Article 286" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "by giving the notification under Article 106-3, item (i) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "provided insurance contract prescribed in the following Article" in Article 300, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified mutual aid contract prescribed in Article 9-7-5, paragraph (3) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "person having a specified relationship (which means any person having a specified relationship as prescribed in Article 103 [including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-13, paragraph (2); the same shall apply in the following Article] or any person having a special relationship as prescribed in Article 194, who is not an insurance holding company or a small-sum, short term insurance holding company (hereinafter referred to as an 'insurance holding company, etc.' in this Article and Article 301-2) for which said insurance company, etc. or foreign insurance company, etc. is a subsidiary company, nor a subsidiary company (excluding an insurance company, etc. or foreign insurance company, etc.) of said insurance holding company, etc., nor a person engaged in insurance business)" in Article 300, paragraph (1), item (viii) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "subsidiary company, etc. (which means a subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 61-2, paragraph (2) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act)"; the phrase "documents listed in the items of Article 4, paragraph (2), items of Article 187, paragraph (3) or items of Article 272-2, paragraph (2)" in Article 300, paragraph (2) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the articles of association, or mutual aid rules prescribed in Article 9-6-2, paragraph (1) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act, or fire mutual aid rules prescribed in Article 27-2, paragraph (3) of the same Act"; the term "Prime Minister" in Article 305 and Article 306 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "administrative agency"; the term "Prime Minister" in Article 307, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "administrative agency"; the phrase "when a specified insurance solicitor or an insurance broker falls under any of the following items, may rescind the registration set forth in Article 276 or Article 286, or may" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "when a specified insurance solicitor or an insurance broker falls under item (iii), may"; and the phrase "all or part of the operations" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "solicitation of mutual aid contracts."
２ 保険業法第二百七十五条第一項第二号及び第二項（保険募集の制限）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合の共済契約の募集について、同法第二百八十三条（所属保険会社等の賠償責任）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合の役員及び使用人並びに当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済代理店（組合の委託を受けて、当該組合のために共済契約の締結の代理又は媒介を行う者であつて、当該組合の役員又は使用人でないものをいう。以下同じ。）並びにその役員及び使用人が行う当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済契約の募集について、同法第二百九十四条（顧客に対する説明）の規定は共済契約の募集を行う共済事業を行う協同組合の役員及び使用人並びに当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済代理店並びにその役員及び使用人について、同法第二百九十五条（自己契約の禁止）の規定は共済代理店について、同法第三百条（禁止行為）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合及びその共済代理店（これらの者の役員及び使用人を含む。）について、同法第三百五条（立入検査等）、第三百六条（業務改善命令）及び第三百七条第一項第三号（登録の取消し等）の規定は共済代理店について、同法第三百九条（保険契約の申込みの撤回等）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合に対し共済契約の申込みをした者又は共済契約者が行う共済契約の申込みの撤回又は解除について、同法第三百十一条（検査職員の証票の携帯及び提示等）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第三百五条の規定による立入り、質問又は検査をする職員について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第二百七十五条第一項第二号、第二百九十四条第三号、第二百九十五条第二項、第三百条第一項第七号及び第九号並びに第三百九条第一項第一号、第二項、第三項、第五項及び第六項中「内閣府令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、同法第二百七十五条第一項第二号及び第二項中「損害保険会社（外国損害保険会社等を含む。以下この編において同じ。）」とあるのは「共済事業を行う協同組合」と、「次条の登録を受けた損害保険代理店」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第百六条の三第一号の届出がなされた共済代理店」と、「損害保険代理店である」とあるのは「共済代理店である」と、同条第二項中「次条又は第二百八十六条の登録を受けて」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第百六条の三第一号の届出を行って」と、同法第三百条第一項中「次条に規定する特定保険契約」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第三項に規定する特定共済契約」と、同項第八号中「特定関係者（第百条の三（第二百七十二条の十三第二項において準用する場合を含む。次条において同じ。）に規定する特定関係者及び第百九十四条に規定する特殊関係者のうち、当該保険会社等又は外国保険会社等を子会社とする保険持株会社及び少額短期保険持株会社（以下この条及び第三百一条の二において「保険持株会社等」という。）、当該保険持株会社等の子会社（保険会社等及び外国保険会社等を除く。）並びに保険業を行う者以外の者をいう。）」とあるのは「子会社等（中小企業等協同組合法第六十一条の二第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。）」と、同条第二項中「第四条第二項各号、第百八十七条第三項各号又は第二百七十二条の二第二項各号に掲げる書類」とあるのは「定款又は中小企業等協同組合法第九条の六の二第一項に規定する共済規程若しくは同法第二十七条の二第三項に規定する火災共済規程」と、同法第三百五条及び第三百六条中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「行政庁」と、同法第三百七条第一項中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「行政庁」と、「次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、第二百七十六条若しくは第二百八十六条の登録を取り消し、又は」とあるのは「第三号に該当するときは、」と、「業務の全部若しくは一部」とあるのは「共済契約の募集」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
- 特許庁
- Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
- ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
- 特許庁
- Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
- 金融庁
- Copyright(C) 2024 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
- 経済産業省
- Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
