「same time」を含む例文一覧(28832)
＜前へ 1 2 .... 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 次へ＞- (4) When the rehabilitation debtor has submitted a proposed rehabilitation plan that specifies special clauses on home loan and it has resulted in any of the cases set forth in the items of paragraph (2), the provision of paragraph (2) shall also apply to an objection made in an investigation of rehabilitation claims, by the time specified in the respective items, by a rehabilitation creditor who holds a home loan claim prescribed in Article 198(1) and does not hold any rehabilitation claim except for said home loan claim or by a guarantee company that does not hold any rehabilitation claim except for a right of exoneration based on the guarantee for the debt for a home loan claim. In this case, the person who has made such objection shall not be subject to the effect of the relevant statements in the schedule of rehabilitation creditors that shall be the same as a final and binding judgment under the provisions of Article 104(3) and Article 180(2).
４ 再生債務者により住宅資金特別条項を定めた再生計画案が提出され、かつ、第二項各号のいずれかに該当することとなったときは、当該各号に定める時までに第百九十八条第一項に規定する住宅資金貸付債権を有する再生債権者であって当該住宅資金貸付債権以外に再生債権を有しないもの又は保証会社であって住宅資金貸付債権に係る債務の保証に基づく求償権以外に再生債権を有しないものが再生債権の調査において述べた異議についても、第二項と同様とする。この場合においては、当該異議を述べた者には、第百四条第三項及び第百八十条第二項の規定による確定判決と同一の効力は、及ばない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 254 (1) Where rehabilitation proceedings are closed as a result of an order of disconfirmation of the rehabilitation plan, an order of discontinuance of rehabilitation proceedings or an order of revocation of the rehabilitation plan becoming final and binding, if an order of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings prescribed in the items of Article 252(1) or in paragraph (3) of said Article is made, a bankruptcy trustee may take over an action set forth in Article 137(1) that is discontinued pursuant to the provisions of Article 68(2) or Article 137(6) (including one set forth in Article 137(1) that is pending at the time of close of rehabilitation proceedings and is discontinued pursuant to the provision of Article 141(1); the same shall apply in paragraph (3) and paragraph (4)). In this case, a petition for taking over of action may also be filed by the opponent.
第二百五十四条 再生計画不認可、再生手続廃止又は再生計画取消しの決定の確定により再生手続が終了した場合において、第二百五十二条第一項各号又は第三項に規定する破産手続開始の決定があったときは、第六十八条第二項又は第百三十七条第六項の規定により中断した同条第一項の訴えに係る訴訟手続（再生手続が終了した際現に係属する同項の訴えに係る訴訟手続で第百四十一条第一項の規定により中断しているものを含む。第三項及び第四項において同じ。）は、破産管財人においてこれを受け継ぐことができる。この場合においては、受継の申立ては、相手方もすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 3 (1) With regard to inward direct investment, etc. pertaining to a notification prior to the enforcement date for which the period during which inward direct investment, etc. may not be made as prescribed in Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Act has not expired at the time of enforcement of this Order and which falls under inward direct investment, etc. that needs to be reported pursuant to the provisions of Article 26, paragraph (3) of the Act due to its relevance to appended table 1 of the Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. after the revision by this Order, the foreign investor who has given said notification may make said inward direct investment, etc. on or after the enforcement date by deeming said period to have expired on the day preceding the enforcement date. In this case, said notification shall be deemed to be a report which was made pursuant to the provisions of the main clause of the same paragraph on the day of making said inward direct investment, etc.
第三条 この命令の施行の際現に法第二十七条第二項に規定する対内直接投資等を行ってはならない期間が満了していない施行日前の届出に係る対内直接投資等で、この命令による改正後の対内直接投資等に関する命令別表第一に該当するため法第二十六条第三項の規定により報告しなければならない対内直接投資等に該当するものについては、施行日の前日において当該期間が満了したものとみなして、当該届出をした外国投資家は、施行日以後当該対内直接投資等を行うことができる。この場合において、当該届出は、当該対内直接投資等が行われた日において同項本文の規定によりされた報告とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Uji-shi planned to develop a medical examination system for babies by utilizing data in the basic resident register of which Uji-City was in charge. For this purpose, the development business was consigned by Uji-City to a private company, which further consigned the same to another company all the way down. Then, a part-time employee of the consignee (three-step consignments between Uji-City) made unauthorized copies of the data in the basic resident register and sold them to name-list distributors, who further resold them to other distributors. With respect to this matter, three inhabitants in Uji-City claimed that they had suffered mental damage due to the aforementioned leakage of data and filed an action against Uji-City with the Kyoto District Court, demanding compensation of damages for mental sufferings and attorney's fee. The Court finally ruled that Uji-City is liable for invasion of privacy rights and ordered Uji-City to pay 15,000 yen (10,000 yen as compensation for mental sufferings and 5,000 yen as attorney's fee) for each person.
宇治市がその管理に係る住民基本台帳のデータを使用して乳幼児検診システムを開発することを企図し、その開発業務を民間業者に委託したところ、再々委託先のアルバイトの従業員が上記データを不正にコピーしてこれを名簿販売業者に販売し、同業者が更に上記データを他に販売するなどをしたことに関して、宇治市の住民３人が、上記データの流出により精神的苦痛を被ったと主張して、宇治市に対し、損害賠償金（慰謝料及び弁護士費用）の支払を求めた事案において、プライバシー権侵害に基づく宇治市の不法行為責任を認め、損害賠償として１人当たり１万5000円（慰謝料１万円及び弁護士費用５０００円）の支払を命じた。 - 経済産業省 - (9) For the time being, the State may, within the scope of the budget, provide a loan without interest of an amount equivalent to the amount that the State may subsidize pursuant to the provisions of Article 75, paragraph (2) (in the case where any law or ordinance stipulates otherwise with regard to the proportion of subsidy by the State under these provisions, they shall include the provisions of said law or ordinance that stipulates otherwise; the same shall apply hereinafter) to a prefecture (in the case where the affairs under Article 74, paragraph (1), which are to be processed by a prefecture, are to be processed by a designated city, etc., pursuant to the provisions of Article 84-2, paragraph (1), this shall include said designated city, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and paragraphs (12) to (14) of the Supplementary Provisions) for the funds to be allocated to the expenses subsidized by said prefecture for the establisher of a public assistance facility other than said prefecture, with regard to a repair, renovation or expansion of a public assistance facility of which expenses may be subsidized by the State pursuant to the provisions of Article 75, paragraph (2) and which falls under Article 2, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Promotion of Social Infrastructure Development Through Use of Proceeds from Sale of the Stock of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Act No. 86 of 1987).
９ 国は、当分の間、都道府県（第八十四条の二第一項の規定により、都道府県が処理することとされている第七十四条第一項の事務を指定都市等が処理する場合にあつては、当該指定都市等を含む。以下この項及び附則第十二項から第十四項までにおいて同じ。）に対し、第七十五条第二項の規定により国がその費用について補助することができる保護施設の修理、改造又は拡張で日本電信電話株式会社の株式の売払収入の活用による社会資本の整備の促進に関する特別措置法（昭和六十二年法律第八十六号）第二条第一項第二号に該当するものにつき、都道府県以外の保護施設の設置者に対し当該都道府県が補助する費用に充てる資金について、予算の範囲内において、第七十五条第二項の規定（この規定による国の補助の割合について、この規定と異なる定めをした法令の規定がある場合には、当該異なる定めをした法令の規定を含む。以下同じ。）により国が補助することができる金額に相当する金額を無利子で貸し付けることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) In the case where a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. has been subject to two or more foreign corporation taxes or to a foreign corporation tax twice or more on its income for a taxable business year, when a consolidated corporation related to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. seeks the application of the provisions of Article 68-91(1) (including the cases where it is applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article by deeming the amount to be as specified therein; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or Article 66-7(1) (including the cases where it is applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article by deeming the amount to be as specified therein; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) of the Act in two or more business years or consolidated business years; with respect to the application of the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act for a consolidated business year following the first one of the said two or more consolidated business years or business years, the amount obtained by deducting the amount listed in item (ii) (the amount listed in item (iii), when seeking the application of the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act for the first time after receiving the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act) from the amount listed in item (i) shall be deemed to be the calculated amount prescribed in the preceding paragraph:
２ 特定外国子会社等につきその課税対象年度の所得に対して二以上の外国法人税が課され、又は二回以上にわたつて外国法人税が課された場合において、当該特定外国子会社等に係る連結法人がその二以上の連結事業年度又は事業年度において法第六十八条の九十一第一項（同条第二項の規定によりみなして適用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）又は第六十六条の七第一項（同条第二項の規定によりみなして適用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の規定の適用を受けるときは、当該二以上の連結事業年度又は事業年度のうち最初の連結事業年度又は事業年度後の連結事業年度に係る法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定の適用については、第一号に掲げる金額から第二号に掲げる金額（法第六十六条の七第一項の規定の適用を受けた場合で、その適用を受けた後最初に法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定の適用を受けるときは、第三号に掲げる金額）を控除した金額をもつて前項に規定する計算した金額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 15 (1) Among the employers with a contractor who carries out a part of the work in an undertaking executed at one place (where as there exists two or more contracts under which a part of the work in the undertaking is begun, there exist two or more such employers, employer who ordered the earliest contract; hereinafter referred to as the "Principal Employer"), one (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Principal Employer") who carries on an undertaking (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Undertaking") related to construction or other industries prescribed by Cabinet Order, shall, where workers employed by him/her and by his/her contractors (where the work in the said undertaking of the principal employer is carried out under subcontracts of several levels, subcontractors who are party to subsequent subcontractors shall be included; hereinafter referred to as "related contractors") perform work at the said place, appoint an overall safety and health controller in order to prevent industrial accidents which may occur as a result of the work carried out by these workers at the same place, and have him/her direct the work of Principal Safety and Health Supervisors, and at the same time exercise overall control over the matters provided for in each item of paragraph (1) of Article 30; provided that this shall not apply where the number of such workers does not reach the figure provided for by Cabinet Order.
第十五条 事業者で、一の場所において行う事業の仕事の一部を請負人に請け負わせているもの（当該事業の仕事の一部を請け負わせる契約が二以上あるため、その者が二以上あることとなるときは、当該請負契約のうちの最も先次の請負契約における注文者とする。以下「元方事業者」という。）のうち、建設業その他政令で定める業種に属する事業（以下「特定事業」という。）を行う者（以下「特定元方事業者」という。）は、その労働者及びその請負人（元方事業者の当該事業の仕事が数次の請負契約によつて行われるときは、当該請負人の請負契約の後次のすべての請負契約の当事者である請負人を含む。以下「関係請負人」という。）の労働者が当該場所において作業を行うときは、これらの労働者の作業が同一の場所において行われることによつて生ずる労働災害を防止するため、統括安全衛生責任者を選任し、その者に元方安全衛生管理者の指揮をさせるとともに、第三十条第一項各号の事項を統括管理させなければならない。ただし、これらの労働者の数が政令で定める数未満であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 3 (1) With regard to inward direct investment, etc. pertaining to a notification prior to the enforcement date for which the period during which inward direct investment, etc. may not be made as prescribed in Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Act has not expired at the time of enforcement of this Order and which falls under inward direct investment, etc. that needs to be reported pursuant to the provisions of Article 55-5, paragraph (1) of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act after the revision by the Act for Partial Revision of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Control Act (said Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act shall be hereinafter referred to as the "New Act") due to its relevance to a business type specified by the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (3) of the Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. after the revision by this Order (said Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. shall be hereinafter referred to as the "New Order") or a country set forth in appended table 1 as prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, the foreign investor who has given said notification may make said inward direct investment, etc. on or after the enforcement date by deeming said period to have expired on the day preceding the enforcement date. In this case, said notification shall be deemed to be a report which was made pursuant to the provisions of the main clause of the same paragraph on the day of making said inward direct investment, etc.
第三条 この命令の施行の際現に旧法第二十七条第二項に規定する対内直接投資等を行ってはならない期間が満了していない施行日前の届出に係る対内直接投資等で、この命令による改正後の対内直接投資等に関する命令（以下「新令」という。）第三条第三項に規定する大蔵大臣及び事業所管大臣が定める業種又は同条第四項に規定する別表第一に掲げる国に該当するため外国為替及び外国貿易管理法の一部を改正する法律による改正後の外国為替及び外国貿易法（以下「新法」という。）第五十五条の五第一項の規定により報告しなければならない対内直接投資等に該当するものについては、施行日の前日において当該期間が満了したものとみなして、当該届出をした外国投資家は、施行日以後当該対内直接投資等を行うことができる。この場合において、当該届出は、当該対内直接投資等が行われた日において同項本文の規定によりされた報告とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (i) The amount pertaining to the transfer of funds from the special international financial transactions account to other accounts at the closing time of every day (if the current day is a holiday, the previous day thereof; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not exceed the amount calculated by multiplying the amount, which is obtained by dividing the monthly total of the amounts pertaining to the operation of funds to non-residents prescribed in Article 21, paragraph (3) of the Act, of which accounting is settled in the special international financial transactions account at the closing time of every day in the month previous to the month to which the said day belongs, by the number of days of the month (where the amount obtained by dividing the total amount by the number of days of the month is not more than the amount specified by the Minister of Finance, the amount specified by the Minister of Finance), by the rate specified by the Minister of Finance (for the period from the day when an approved financial institution for the special international financial transactions account started accounting related to the special international financial transactions account to the last day of the month following the month to which the said day belongs, the amount instructed by the Minister of Finance by considering the state of money loan in foreign currency provided by the approved financial institution for the special international financial transactions account or other circumstances).
一 毎日（当日が休日であるときは、その前日。以下この項において同じ。）の終業時における特別国際金融取引勘定からその他の勘定への資金の振替に係る金額は、その日の属する月の前月中の毎日の終業時において特別国際金融取引勘定に経理されている金額のうち法第二十一条第三項に規定する非居住者に対する資金の運用に係るもののその月中の合計額をその月の日数で除して得た金額（当該合計額をその月の日数で除して得た金額が財務大臣の定める金額以下の場合にあつては、財務大臣が定める金額）に財務大臣の定める率を乗じて算定した金額（特別国際金融取引勘定承認金融機関が特別国際金融取引勘定に関する経理を開始した日から同日の属する月の翌月の末日までの間においては、当該特別国際金融取引勘定承認金融機関の外国通貨による金銭の貸付けの状況その他の事情を勘案して財務大臣が指示する金額）を限度とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 139 With regard to any Policyholders Protection Fund in existence at the time when this Act enters into force that carries on the Business of Financial Assistance, etc. (referring to the Business of Financial Assistance, etc. prescribed in Article 259, paragraph (1) of the Former Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply in the following Article) at the time when this Act enters into force, the Former Insurance Business Act shall remain in force even after this Act enters into force until the Business of Financial Assistance, etc. is completed, within the limit necessary for executing the Business of Financial Assistance, etc. In this case, the terms "Minister of Finance" and "Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance" in Part II, Chapter X, Section 2 (excluding Article 267, paragraph (5), Article 269, paragraph (2) and Article 270, paragraph (3)) of the Former Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance" and "Cabinet Office Ordinance and Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance," respectively; and the terms "incompetent" and "quasi-incompetent" in Article 259, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the Former Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "adult ward" and "person under curatorship," respectively; any necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
第百三十九条 この法律の施行の際現に存する保険契約者保護基金であって、この法律の施行の際現に資金援助等事業（旧保険業法第二百五十九条第一項に規定する資金援助等事業をいう。次条において同じ。）を行っているものについては、旧保険業法は、この法律の施行後も、当該資金援助等事業が終了するまでの間、当該資金援助等事業の実施に必要な範囲内において、なおその効力を有する。この場合において、旧保険業法第二編第十章第二節（第二百六十七条第五項、第二百六十九条第二項及び第二百七十条第三項を除く。）中「大蔵大臣」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣及び財務大臣」と、「大蔵省令」とあるのは「内閣府令・財務省令」と、旧保険業法第二百五十九条第一項第三号中「禁治産者」とあるのは「成年被後見人」と、「準禁治産者」とあるのは「被保佐人」と、旧保険業法第二百六十七条第五項、第二百六十九条第二項及び第二百七十条第三項中「大蔵大臣」とあるのは「財務大臣」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day.
２ 新銀行法第十三条第二項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額（同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等（同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day.
第百二条 第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) In the event of opposition to a patent, a third party who proves that legal action has been filed against him on the grounds of infringement of said patent may, after the opposition period has expired, intervene in the opposition proceedings as opponent, provided said opponent gives notice of intervention within three months of the date on which the infringement action was instituted. The same shall apply to any third party who proves that, after patentee demands that he cease and desist the alleged infringement, he, has filed a legal action against said patentee requesting a ruling declaring that he is not infringing the patent. Notice of intervention shall be filed in writing and shall state the reasons for said intervention before expiration of the time limit mentioned in the first sentence. The third to fifth sentences of subsection (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
(2) 特許に対する異議申立の場合は，第三者であって，同人を相手として当該特許の侵害を理由とする訴訟が提起されていることを証明する者は，異議申立期間の満了後，その異議申立手続に異議申立人として参加することができるが，ただし，当該異議申立人が，侵害訴訟が提起された日から 3月以内に参加通知書を出すことを条件とする。同一規定が，第三者であって，特許所有者が同人は侵害と称されている行為を中止するよう要求した後，特許所有者を相手方とし，同人は特許を侵害していない旨の確認を要求する訴訟を提起していることを証明する者に適用される。参加通知は，第 1文にいう期限の到来前に書面により提出しなければならず，かつ，当該参加の理由を記述していなければならない。(1)第 3文から第 5文までが準用される。 - 特許庁 - According to the report, “the Financial Revitalization Program was a policy initiative formulated upon the instruction of Minister Heizo Takenaka, so it was an initiative of his own.” It points out that “this program set forth the policy of speeding up the approval of banking licenses” and that “Minister Takenaka announced this program on October 30 without the direct involvement of the FSA Commissioner and other FSA staff in its formulation.” The report adds that “the FSA was notified about this program at the same time as its public announcement; the FSA staff was ordered to conduct financial administration based on it” and that “Mr.Tsuyoshi Kimura explained its contents to the FSA staff.” The report also points out that “the FSA staff felt compelled to grant a license (to Incubator Bank of Japan) under pressure from the policy of speeding up the approval of banking licenses amid the atmosphere that made it appear as if the implementation of the Financial Revitalization Program was the imperative.”
報告書によれば、「『金融再生プログラム』は、竹中平蔵大臣の指示によって作成された方針であり、竹中大臣固有の方針である。」「同プログラムには、『銀行免許認可の迅速化』の方針が示されている。」「金融庁長官以下、金融庁職員は直接的には参画しないまま、10月30日に竹中大臣が『金融再生プログラム』を発表した。」それから、「同プログラムは発表と同時に金融庁に示達され、金融職員はこれに基づいて、金融行政をやるように命ぜられ、その内容を金融庁職員に説明したのが木村剛氏であった。」というふうに報告書に書いてあります。「竹中大臣の『金融再生プログラム』の実現が至上命令であるかのような雰囲気の中で、『銀行免許認可の迅速化』の方針がプレッシャーとなり、免許交付に追い込まれた」といった指摘がなされております。 - 金融庁 - Article 4 (1) A fire chief or fire station chief, when it is necessary for fire prevention, may order a person concerned to submit information materials or request a person concerned to make reports, or have his/her fire defense personnel (in the case of a municipality which has no fire defense headquarters, an official engaged in the fire service affairs of the municipality or a full-time fire corps volunteer of the municipality; the same shall apply hereinafter, except in Article 5-3, paragraph (2)) enter any place of work, factory or place with public access or any other place concerned, and inspect the position, structure equipment or the status of the management of the property under fire defense measures or ask questions of any related person; provided, however, that the fire chief or fire station chief shall have no person enter an individual's residence unless the person concerned gives consent or there is a particularly urgent necessity for such entry due to an extremely high fire risk.
第四条 消防長又は消防署長は、火災予防のために必要があるときは、関係者に対して資料の提出を命じ、若しくは報告を求め、又は当該消防職員（消防本部を置かない市町村においては、当該市町村の消防事務に従事する職員又は常勤の消防団員。第五条の三第二項を除き、以下同じ。）にあらゆる仕事場、工場若しくは公衆の出入する場所その他の関係のある場所に立ち入つて、消防対象物の位置、構造、設備及び管理の状況を検査させ、若しくは関係のある者に質問させることができる。ただし、個人の住居は、関係者の承諾を得た場合又は火災発生のおそれが著しく大であるため、特に緊急の必要がある場合でなければ、立ち入らせてはならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 4 (1) With regard to the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. Pertaining to a Notification Pursuant to the Provisions of the Old Act (limited to those which have been notified by a resident; the same shall apply in the next paragraph) for which the period in which the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. shall not be conducted prescribed in Article 29, paragraph 3 of the Old Act has not actually expired at the time of the enforcement of this Act, which falls under the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. that shall be reported pursuant to the provision of Article 29 of the New Act, a resident who has given the notification may conduct the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. on and after the Date of Enforcement, deeming that the period has expired on the previous day of the Date of Enforcement. In this case, a notification pertaining to the resident shall be deemed to be a report made pursuant to the provision of the main clause of the said article on the date of the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc.
第四条 この法律の施行の際現に旧法第二十九条第三項に規定する技術導入契約の締結等をしてはならない期間が満了していない旧法の規定による届出に係る技術導入契約の締結等（居住者が届け出たものに限る。次項において同じ。）で、新法第二十九条の規定により報告しなければならない技術導入契約の締結等に該当するものについては、施行日の前日において当該期間が満了したものとみなして、当該届出をした居住者は、施行日以後当該技術導入契約の締結等をすることができる。この場合において、当該居住者に係る届出は、当該技術導入契約の締結等がされた日において同条本文の規定によりされた報告とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 13 After the enforcement of this Act, application of the relevant acts revised by this Act for dispositions and other acts such as permits (hereinafter referred to as "acts including dispositions etc.") occurring pursuant to the provisions of the relevant acts in force before the enforcement of this Act (or the provisions in Article 1 of the Supplementary Provisions if applicable; hereinafter the same shall apply in this article and the following article), or applications for permits and other acts occurring pursuant to the provision of the relevant acts prior to the revision at the time of enforcement of this Act (hereinafter referred to as "acts including applications etc." in this article) shall be considered as acts including dispositions etc. or acts including applications etc. occurring pursuant to the corresponding provisions of the relevant Act revised by this Act respectively, excepting the provisions of Article 5 through Article 10 of the Supplemental Provisions or the provisions concerning transitional measures of the relevant acts revised by this Act (including orders pursuant to said acts).
第十三条 この法律（附則第一条ただし書に規定する規定については、当該規定。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）の施行前に改正前のそれぞれの法律の規定によりされた許可等の処分その他の行為（以下この条において「処分等の行為」という。）又はこの法律の施行の際現に改正前のそれぞれの法律の規定によりされている許可等の申請その他の行為（以下この条において「申請等の行為」という。）に対するこの法律の施行の日以後における改正後のそれぞれの法律の適用については、附則第五条から第十条までの規定又は改正後のそれぞれの法律（これに基づく命令を含む。）の経過措置に関する規定に定めるものを除き、改正後のそれぞれの法律の相当規定によりされた処分等の行為又は申請等の行為とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (7) The provisions of Articles 40, 41 and Article 42, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the detention pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph. In this case, "the written detention order set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 40 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the written detention order set forth in Article 13, paragraph (6)"; "the suspect" with "the alien granted permission for provisional landing"; and "the summary of the suspected offense" with "grounds for detention", respectively. In Article 41, paragraph (1), "shall be within 30 days. However, if a supervising immigration inspector finds that there are unavoidable reasons, he/she may extend such period for only a further 30 days" shall be deemed to be replaced with "for a period of time preceding the completion of procedures for landing provided for in Chapter III which the supervising immigration inspector finds to be necessary"; and in paragraph (3) of the same Article and Article 42, paragraph (1), "a suspect" shall be deemed to be replaced with "an alien granted permission for provisional landing".
７ 第四十条から第四十二条第一項までの規定は、前項の規定による収容に準用する。この場合において、第四十条中「前条第一項の収容令書」とあるのは「第十三条第六項の収容令書」と、「容疑者」とあるのは「仮上陸の許可を受けた外国人」と、「容疑事実の要旨」とあるのは「収容すべき事由」と、第四十一条第一項中「三十日以内とする。但し、主任審査官は、やむを得ない事由があると認めるときは、三十日を限り延長することができる。」とあるのは「第三章に規定する上陸の手続が完了するまでの間において、主任審査官が必要と認める期間とする。」と、同条第三項及び第四十二条第一項中「容疑者」とあるのは「仮上陸の許可を受けた外国人」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 49 (1) No person shall, after public notice concerning an aerodrome for public use given under Article 40 (including when applying accordingly to Article 43 paragraph (2)) install, plant, or leave any structures (except the part pertaining to the relevant construction in the structures which are under construction at the time of public notice), plants or any other objects which protrude above the approach surface, transitional surface or horizontal surface (The surface taken shall be the lowest one if overlap of these projected planes occur.) indicated in the said public notice; provided, however, that the same shall not apply where temporary structures and any other objects (except those pertaining to approach surfaces or transitional surfaces) specified by Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism are installed or left under the approval of the aerodrome provider and are planned for removal before the scheduled starting date of services.
第四十九条 何人も、公共の用に供する飛行場について第四十条（第四十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の告示があつた後においては、その告示で示された進入表面、転移表面又は水平表面（これらの投影面が一致する部分については、これらのうち最も低い表面とする。）の上に出る高さの建造物（その告示の際現に建造中である建造物の当該建造工事に係る部分を除く。）、植物その他の物件を設置し、植栽し、又は留置してはならない。但し、仮設物その他の国土交通省令で定める物件（進入表面又は転移表面に係るものを除く。）で飛行場の設置者の承認を受けて設置し又は留置するもの及び供用開始の予定期日前に除去される物件については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (4) Where an invention and a device claimed in applications for a patent and a utility model registration are identical (excluding the case where an invention claimed in a patent application based on a utility model registration under Article 46-2(1) (including a patent application that is deemed to have been filed at the time of filing of the said patent application under Article 44(2) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 46(5)) and a device relating to the said utility model registration are identical) and the applications for a patent and a utility model registration are filed on the same date, only one of the applicants, selected by consultations between the applicants, shall be entitled to obtain a patent or a utility model registration. Where no agreement is reached by consultations or no consultations are able to be held, the applicant for a patent shall not be entitled to obtain a patent for the invention claimed therein.
４ 特許出願に係る発明と実用新案登録出願に係る考案とが同一である場合（第四十六条の二第一項の規定による実用新案登録に基づく特許出願（第四十四条第二項（第四十六条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により当該特許出願の時にしたものとみなされるものを含む。）に係る発明とその実用新案登録に係る考案とが同一である場合を除く。）において、その特許出願及び実用新案登録出願が同日にされたものであるときは、出願人の協議により定めた一の出願人のみが特許又は実用新案登録を受けることができる。協議が成立せず、又は協議をすることができないときは、特許出願人は、その発明について特許を受けることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (6) Any resolution pertaining to the reduction of the capital, etc. under Article 447, paragraph (1) (Reductions in Amount of Capital) or Article 448, paragraph (1) (Reductions in Amount of Reserves) of the Companies Act shall be invalid if the number of Policyholders who have raised their objections within the period set forth in paragraph (2), item (iii) (excluding the holders of policies under which Insurance Claims, etc. had already arisen at the time of public notice under that paragraph (but limited to those policies that would be terminated with the payment of the Insurance Claims, etc.); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph, as well as in paragraph (4) of the following Article) exceeds one fifth of the total number of Policyholders, and the amount specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as the credits (excluding Insurance Claims, etc.) belonging to the insurance contracts of the Policyholders who have stated such objections exceeds one fifth of the total amount of credits belonging to the Policyholders.
６ 第二項第三号の期間内に異議を述べた保険契約者（同項の規定による公告の時において既に保険金請求権等が生じている保険契約（当該保険金請求権等に係る支払により消滅することとなるものに限る。）に係る保険契約者を除く。以下この項及び次条第四項において同じ。）の数が保険契約者の総数の五分の一を超え、かつ、当該異議を述べた保険契約者の保険契約に係る債権（保険金請求権等を除く。）の額に相当する金額として内閣府令で定める金額が保険契約者の当該金額の総額の五分の一を超えるときは、資本金等の額の減少に係る会社法第四百四十七条第一項（資本金の額の減少）又は第四百四十八条第一項（準備金の額の減少）の決議は、効力を有しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 101 (1) Where a bankruptcy creditor who filed a proof of claim for salary or claim for retirement allowance, both of which are preferred bankruptcy claims, is likely to have difficulties in maintaining his/her living standards unless he/she receives payment of these bankruptcy claims, the court, before permission is granted for the first time for the final distribution prescribed in Article 195(1), simplified distribution prescribed in Article 204(1), consensual distribution prescribed in Article 208(1) or interim distribution prescribed in Article 209(1), upon the petition of a bankruptcy trustee or by its own authority, may permit payment of the claim in whole or part; provided, however, that this shall apply only if such payment is not likely to harm the interest of a person who holds a claim on the estate or any other preferred bankruptcy claim with the senior or same priority.
第百一条 優先的破産債権である給料の請求権又は退職手当の請求権について届出をした破産債権者が、これらの破産債権の弁済を受けなければその生活の維持を図るのに困難を生ずるおそれがあるときは、裁判所は、最初に第百九十五条第一項に規定する最後配当、第二百四条第一項に規定する簡易配当、第二百八条第一項に規定する同意配当又は第二百九条第一項に規定する中間配当の許可があるまでの間、破産管財人の申立てにより又は職権で、その全部又は一部の弁済をすることを許可することができる。ただし、その弁済により財団債権又は他の先順位若しくは同順位の優先的破産債権を有する者の利益を害するおそれがないときに限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 186 (1) Where there exist any security interests (meaning a special statutory lien, pledge, mortgage, or a right of retention under the provisions of the Commercial Code or the Companies Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section), at the time of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, against property that belongs to the bankruptcy estate, if it is in the common interests of bankruptcy creditors to cause said security interests to be extinguished by selling by private contract said property, a bankruptcy trustee may file a petition to the court for permission for the measure to sell by private contract the property and cause all security interests to be extinguished by paying to the court the amount of money specified in each of the following items for the cases listed in the respective items; provided, however, that this shall not apply if such measure would unduly harm the interest of the persons who hold the security interests in question:
第百八十六条 破産手続開始の時において破産財団に属する財産につき担保権（特別の先取特権、質権、抵当権又は商法若しくは会社法の規定による留置権をいう。以下この節において同じ。）が存する場合において、当該財産を任意に売却して当該担保権を消滅させることが破産債権者の一般の利益に適合するときは、破産管財人は、裁判所に対し、当該財産を任意に売却し、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じてそれぞれ当該各号に定める額に相当する金銭が裁判所に納付されることにより当該財産につき存するすべての担保権を消滅させることについての許可の申立てをすることができる。ただし、当該担保権を有する者の利益を不当に害することとなると認められるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 3 (1) With regard to inward direct investment, etc. pertaining to a notification prior to the enforcement date for which the period during which inward direct investment, etc. may not be made as prescribed in Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Act has not expired at the time of enforcement of this Order and which falls under inward direct investment, etc. that needs to be reported pursuant to the provisions of Article 55-5, paragraph (1) of the Act due to its relevance to a country set forth in appended table 1 of the Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. after the revision by this Order, the foreign investor who has given said notification may make said inward direct investment, etc. on or after the enforcement date by deeming said period to have expired on the day preceding the enforcement date. In this case, said notification shall be deemed to be a report which was made pursuant to the provisions of the main clause of the same paragraph on the day of making said inward direct investment, etc.
第三条 この命令の施行の際現に法第二十七条第二項に規定する対内直接投資等を行ってはならない期間が満了していない施行日前の届出に係る対内直接投資等で、この命令による改正後の対内直接投資等に関する命令別表第一に掲げる国に該当するため法第五十五条の五第一項の規定により報告しなければならない対内直接投資等に該当するものについては、施行日の前日において当該期間が満了したものとみなして、当該届出をした外国投資家は、施行日以後当該対内直接投資等を行うことができる。この場合において、当該届出は、当該対内直接投資等が行われた日において同項本文の規定によりされた報告とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 3 (1) For inward direct investment, etc. pertaining to a notification prior to the enforcement date with regard to which the period during which inward direct investment, etc. may not be carried out as prescribed in Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Act has not expired as of the time of the enforcement of this Order, and that falls under the category of inward direct investment, etc. that is to be reported pursuant to the provisions of Article 26, paragraph (3) of the Act due to the relevance to a country listed in Appended Table 1 of the Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. after its revision by this Order, said period may be deemed to have expired on the day preceding the enforcement date, and the foreign investor who has given said notification may carry out said inward direct investment, etc. on or after the enforcement date. In this case, said notification shall be deemed to be a report that was made pursuant to the provisions of the main clause of the same paragraph on the day on which said inward direct investment, etc. was carried out.
第三条 この命令の施行の際現に法第二十七条第二項に規定する対内直接投資等を行ってはならない期間が満了していない施行日前の届出に係る対内直接投資等で、この命令による改正後の対内直接投資等に関する命令別表第一（に掲げる国）に該当するため法第二十六条第三項の規定により報告しなければならない対内直接投資等に該当するものについては、施行日の前日において当該期間が満了したものとみなして、当該届出をした外国投資家は、施行日以後当該対内直接投資等を行うことができる。この場合において、当該届出は、当該対内直接投資等が行われた日において同項本文の規定によりされた報告とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 34 (1) Where the shareholders meeting of a Bank passes a resolution for transferring the whole of its business or for acquiring the whole of the other's business (or, in the case where a Bank acquires the whole of the other's business not through the resolution required by Article 467(1) (Approvals of Assignment of Business) of the Companies Act pursuant to the provision of Article 468 (Cases where Approval of Assignment of Business is not Required) of that Act, where its board of directors passes a resolution for acquiring such business or its executive officers decide to acquire such business), the Bank shall, within two weeks from the day of the resolution or decision, make public notice, in the official gazette, of the gist of the resolution or the decision and to the effect that any creditors who have any objection to the transfer of the whole of its business or acquisition of the whole of the other's business ought to file an objection within a specified period of time, and shall give notice of the same separately to each known creditor other than Depositors, etc. or any other creditors specified by a Cabinet Order, if any.
第三十四条 銀行を当事者とする事業の全部の譲渡又は譲受けについて株主総会の決議（会社法第四百六十八条（事業譲渡等の承認を要しない場合）の規定により同法第四百六十七条第一項（事業譲渡等の承認等）の決議によらずに事業の全部の譲受けを行う場合には、取締役会の決議又は執行役の決定）がされたときは、当該銀行は、当該決議又は決定の日から二週間以内に、当該決議又は決定の要旨及び当該事業の全部の譲渡又は譲受けに異議のある債権者は一定の期間内に異議を述べるべき旨を官報に公告し、かつ、預金者等その他政令で定める債権者以外の知れている債権者には、各別にこれを催告しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (xiv) Transactions where the relevant parties promise to give and receive money calculated based on the difference between a numerical value that the parties have agreed upon in advance as the numerical value of an interest rate, currency value, product price, price for Carbon Dioxide Equivalent Quotas (meaning carbon dioxide equivalent quotas defined in Article 2, paragraph (6) (Definitions) of the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (Act No. 117 of 1998) and those equivalent thereto; the same shall apply in item (iv) of the following Article) or any other index and the actual numerical value of that index at a fixed point of time in the future, or any equivalent transactions specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance (referred to as "Financial Derivative Transactions" in the following item) which are transactions found unlikely to damage the soundness of the management of the Bank as specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance (excluding transactions that fall under the categories of business listed in items (v) and (xii));
十四 金利、通貨の価格、商品の価格、算定割当量（地球温暖化対策の推進に関する法律（平成十年法律第百十七号）第二条第六項（定義）に規定する算定割当量その他これに類似するものをいう。次条第四号において同じ。）の価格その他の指標の数値としてあらかじめ当事者間で約定された数値と将来の一定の時期における現実の当該指標の数値の差に基づいて算出される金銭の授受を約する取引又はこれに類似する取引であつて内閣府令で定めるもの（次号において「金融等デリバティブ取引」という。）のうち銀行の経営の健全性を損なうおそれがないと認められる取引として内閣府令で定めるもの（第五号及び第十二号に掲げる業務に該当するものを除く。） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 72 (1) For the time being, the national government may, within the scope of the budget, provide loans without interest to a prefectural government (including Designated Cities, etc., in the case where they handle the affairs set forth in Article 56-2 paragraph (1) that are supposed to be handled by a prefectural government pursuant to the provision of Article 59-4 paragraph (1); the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph and paragraph (7)), and any such loan shall be in the amount equivalent to the amount that can be subsidized by the national government pursuant to the provision of Article 56-2 paragraph (3) (including the provisions of the laws and regulations, if any, which provide for other different percentages that can be subsidized by the national government; the same shall apply hereinafter). Such loans shall be funded to be appropriated to the expenses subsidized by said prefectural government to social welfare corporations established pursuant to the provision of Article 31 paragraph (1) of the Social Welfare Act, the Japanese Red Cross Society or non-profit incorporated associations or non-profit incorporated foundations, if such subsidies from said prefectural government are granted for the expenses spent for such Construction, etc. of institutions for mentally retarded children, etc. that can be subsidized by the national government pursuant to the provision of pursuant to the provision of Article 56-2 paragraph (3) and that falls under Article 2 item (ii) paragraph (1) of the Act on Special Measures concerning Promotion of Development of Infrastructures by Utilization of Revenues from the Sale of Shares of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Act No. 86 of 1987) (hereinafter referred to as "Act on Special Measures concerning Infrastructure Development").
第七十二条 国は、当分の間、都道府県（第五十九条の四第一項の規定により、都道府県が処理することとされている第五十六条の二第一項の事務を指定都市等が処理する場合にあつては、当該指定都市等を含む。以下この項及び第七項において同じ。）に対し、第五十六条の二第三項の規定により国がその費用について補助することができる知的障害児施設等の新設等で日本電信電話株式会社の株式の売払収入の活用による社会資本の整備の促進に関する特別措置法（昭和六十二年法律第八十六号。以下「社会資本整備特別措置法」という。）第二条第一項第二号に該当するものにつき、社会福祉法第三十一条第一項の規定により設立された社会福祉法人、日本赤十字社又は公益社団法人若しくは公益財団法人に対し当該都道府県が補助する費用に充てる資金について、予算の範囲内において、第五十六条の二第三項の規定（この規定による国の補助の割合について、この規定と異なる定めをした法令の規定がある場合には、当該異なる定めをした法令の規定を含む。以下同じ。）により国が補助することができる金額に相当する金額を無利子で貸し付けることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 55-3-2 (1) The Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism may, when he/she finds it necessary for the implementation of emergency measures for a wide area disaster (measures such as emergency transportation outside of the area of a prefecture and others (specified in Article 50 paragraph (1) of the Basic Act on Disaster Control Measures (Act No. 223 of 1961)) and others implemented using Port Facilities and specified in an Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), determine a period of time to manage by himself/herself the Port Facility deemed necessary to implement emergency measures for a wide area disaster and specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism among Port Facilities created by Port and Harbor Works pursuant to Article 52 in the wide area disaster management zone of ports (meaning the zones which the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism has publicly notified in advance as a zone especially necessary for the implementation of emergency measures for wide area disasters in consideration of the utilization, layout and other factors of Port Facilities within a Port Area, Waterfront Area and other area for a Port Facility which the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism has designated pursuant to the provisions of Article 2 paragraph (6); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), regardless of the provisions of Article 54 paragraph (1) (referred to as the "Port Facility for Wide Area Disaster Management" in this Article).
第五十五条の三の二 国土交通大臣は、広域災害応急対策（一の都道府県の区域を越えて行われる緊急輸送の確保その他の災害応急対策（災害対策基本法（昭和三十六年法律第二百二十三号）第五十条第一項に規定する災害応急対策をいう。）であつて、港湾施設を使用して行うものとして国土交通省令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）の実施のため必要があると認めるときは、第五十四条第一項の規定にかかわらず、港湾広域防災区域（港湾区域、臨港地区又は第二条第六項の規定により国土交通大臣の認定した港湾施設の区域のうち、港湾施設の利用、配置その他の状況により、広域災害応急対策を実施するために特に必要があると認めて国土交通大臣があらかじめ告示した区域をいう。以下この条において同じ。）内における第五十二条に規定する港湾工事によつて生じた港湾施設のうち、広域災害応急対策の実施のため必要なものとして国土交通省令で定めるもの（以下この条において「港湾広域防災施設」という。）について、期間を定めて、自ら管理することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) In the case where a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. has been subject to two or more foreign corporation taxes or to a foreign corporation tax twice or more on its income for a taxable business year, when a domestic corporation related to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. seeks the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) (including the cases where it is applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article by deeming the amount to be as specified therein; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or Article 68-91(1) (including the cases where it is applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article by deeming the amount to be as specified therein; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) of the Act, regarding the amount of the said foreign corporation taxes in two or more business years or consolidated business years; with respect to the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act for a business year following the first one of the said two or more business years or consolidated business years, the amount obtained by deducting the amount listed in item (ii) (the amount listed in item (iii), when seeking the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act for the first time after receiving the application of the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act) from the amount listed in item (i) shall be deemed to be the calculated amount prescribed in the preceding paragraph:
２ 特定外国子会社等につきその課税対象年度の所得に対して二以上の外国法人税が課され、又は二回以上にわたつて外国法人税が課された場合において、当該特定外国子会社等に係る内国法人がその二以上の事業年度又は連結事業年度において当該外国法人税の額につき法第六十六条の七第一項（同条第二項の規定によりみなして適用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）又は第六十八条の九十一第一項（同条第二項の規定によりみなして適用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の規定の適用を受けるときは、当該二以上の事業年度又は連結事業年度のうち最初の事業年度又は連結事業年度後の事業年度に係る法第六十六条の七第一項の規定の適用については、第一号に掲げる金額から第二号に掲げる金額（法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定の適用を受けた場合で、その適用を受けた後最初に法第六十六条の七第一項の規定の適用を受けるときは、第三号に掲げる金額）を控除した金額をもつて前項に規定する計算した金額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 49 (1) Where a Service Provider concludes a Specified Continuous Service Contract, the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services may terminate said contract when eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 42 (2) (if the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services had not rescinded the Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 48 (1) by said time limit due to being misled by the Service Provider's act of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 44 (1), information concerning the rescission of the Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Service Provider's act of intimidating the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services in violation of the provision of Article 44 (3), it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services received a document, which has been issued by the Service Provider pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry under the same paragraph and contains a notice to the effect that the recipient of the Specified Continuous Services may rescind said Specified Continuous Service Contract pursuant to the provision of the same paragraph).
第四十九条 役務提供事業者が特定継続的役務提供契約を締結した場合におけるその特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者は、第四十二条第二項の書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後（その特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者が、役務提供事業者が第四十四条第一項の規定に違反して前条第一項の規定による特定継続的役務提供契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は役務提供事業者が第四十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに前条第一項の規定による特定継続的役務提供契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該特定継続的役務の提供を受ける者が、当該役務提供事業者が同項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による当該特定継続的役務提供契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後）においては、将来に向かつてその特定継続的役務提供契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) Where a seller concludes a Specified Right Sales Contract, the purchaser of the rights to receive offer of the Specified Continuous Services may terminate the Specified Right Sales Contract when eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 42 (3) (if the purchaser of the rights to receive offer of the Specified Continuous Services had not rescinded the Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 48 (1) by said time limit due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 44 (1), information concerning the rescission of the Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of Paragraph 1 of this article, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services in violation of the provision of Article 44 (3), it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services received a document, which has been issued by the Service Provider pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry referred to in the same paragraph and contains a notice to the effect that the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services may rescind said Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of the same paragraph).
３ 販売業者が特定権利販売契約を締結した場合におけるその特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者は、第四十二条第三項の書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後（その特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者が、販売業者が第四十四条第一項の規定に違反して前条第一項の規定による特定権利販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は販売業者が第四十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに前条第一項の規定による特定権利販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者が、当該販売業者が同項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による当該特定権利販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後）においては、その特定権利販売契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - As I repeatedly say, it is true that a higher capital adequacy figure may appear to imply security at a glance, but it can also lead to a credit crunch or oppressive debt collection practices, as we experienced 10 years ago. Back then, even healthy companies went under. As a Diet member of the ruling party in a ministerial post, I was faced firsthand with the confusion that prevailed in the Japanese economy at that time. It was in 1997 that the Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went under and Yamaichi Securities failed, soon ushering in what would be called the "Financial Diet Session." The Basel meeting is attended by 27 countries and, for all of them, a higher ratio figure, which does provide peace of mind and security, is at the same time not necessarily better in that light. As making a capital adequacy ratio too high can lead to a credit crunch and oppressive debt collection and hence a shrinking economy, we are hoping to maintain a good balance in view of all those factors. We are determined to make our point in the new requirement debate, keeping in mind where we stand as a country that actually experienced a financial crisis 10 years ago.
私は何回も申しますように、自己資本比率が高ければ高いほど確かに一見安全に見えますけれども、それだと、よく我々10年前に経験したように、貸し渋り・貸し剥がしが起こるわけでございますから、あのとき健全な企業まで、健全に近い企業まで倒産をしたというようなことがございますし、日本の経済が混乱したということは10年前私も、何度も申し上げます、与党の国会議員として、私が閣僚のときに、1997年か98年でございますが、北海道拓殖銀行が倒産する、山一證券が破綻するという時代で、その後が金融国会でございましたから、身をもって体験しておりますから、やはりそこら辺は安心・安定という、これはこの金融機関あるいは金融システム、基本的にG20の世界でございますし、このバーゼルの会議は27カ国出ていますけれども、そういった意味の安心・安全ということと同時に、余り数値だけ高ければ高いほどいいわけではない。そこは余り高くしますと、今さっき言ったように、今度は貸し渋り・貸し剥がしが起きて経済そのものが縮小するわけでございますから、そこら辺をきちんとバランスを持ってやっていきたいというふうに思っておりまして、そういった意味のことを、新規制が我々の立場、10年前に金融危機を実際に経験して、そういった立場もきちんと踏まえながら主張をしていきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁 - Article 3 A person who, at the time of the enforcement of this Act, has been an official (excluding a chairperson and a member of councils, etc. set forth in Article 8 of the National Government Organization Act [Act No. 120 of 1948], a member of the Central Disaster Prevention Council, a chairperson and a member of the Japanese Industrial Standards Committee, and those specified as similar persons by a Cabinet Order) of the prior and existing Prime Minister's Office, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Ministry of International Trade and Industry, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications, the Ministry of Labor, the Ministry of Construction or the Ministry of Home Affairs (hereinafter referred to as a "Prior and Existing Ministry or Agency" in this Article) shall, unless an appointment is announced separately, become a relevant official of the Cabinet Office, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, or the Ministry of the Environment after the enforcement of this Act (hereinafter referred to as a "New Ministry or Agency" in this Article), or a department or organization established thereunder, which is specified by a Cabinet Order as the New Office or Ministry or the department or organization established thereunder that corresponds to the Former Office or Ministry or the department or organization established thereunder to which said official belongs at the time of the enforcement of this Act, with the same working conditions.
第三条 この法律の施行の際現に従前の総理府、法務省、外務省、大蔵省、文部省、厚生省、農林水産省、通商産業省、運輸省、郵政省、労働省、建設省又は自治省（以下この条において「従前の府省」という。）の職員（国家行政組織法（昭和二十三年法律第百二十号）第八条の審議会等の会長又は委員長及び委員、中央防災会議の委員、日本工業標準調査会の会長及び委員並びにこれらに類する者として政令で定めるものを除く。）である者は、別に辞令を発せられない限り、同一の勤務条件をもって、この法律の施行後の内閣府、総務省、法務省、外務省、財務省、文部科学省、厚生労働省、農林水産省、経済産業省、国土交通省若しくは環境省（以下この条において「新府省」という。）又はこれに置かれる部局若しくは機関のうち、この法律の施行の際現に当該職員が属する従前の府省又はこれに置かれる部局若しくは機関の相当の新府省又はこれに置かれる部局若しくは機関として政令で定めるものの相当の職員となるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (7) In the case where the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider is the Transferor Company prescribed in Article 135, paragraph (3) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act, the term "the Transferor Company and the Transferee Company" in Article 136, paragraphs (1) and (3) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Transferee Company," the terms "directors (or, in a company with Committees, executive officers)," "for a period ranging from two weeks before the date of the Shareholders Meeting, etc. set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article," and "the Transfer Agreement concluded under Article 135, paragraph (1) and other" in Article 136-2, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "officers," "on the creation day of the contract pertaining to the contract set forth in Article 135, paragraph (1) (hereinafter defined as "Transfer Agreement")," and "the Transfer Agreement and other," respectively; the term "A shareholder or Policyholder of the Transferor Company" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "An Affected Policyholder,", and the term "the time of the adoption of the resolution under Article 136, paragraph (1)" in Article 138 of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the time of preparation of the Transfer Agreement."
７ 特定少額短期保険業者が新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十五条第三項に規定する移転会社である場合においては、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十六条第一項及び第三項中「移転会社及び移転先会社」とあるのは「移転先会社」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十六条の二第一項中「取締役（委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役）」とあるのは「役員」と、「前条第一項の株主総会等の会日の二週間前」とあるのは「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書（以下この節において「移転契約書」という。）の作成日」と、「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書その他の」とあるのは「移転契約書その他の」と、同条第二項中「移転会社の株主又は保険契約者」とあるのは「移転対象契約者」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十八条中「第百三十六条第一項の決議があった時」とあるのは「移転契約書を作成した時」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (5) [If an Excuse/Exclusion clause is not included]If, as of the date of distribution under the liquidation procedures of the Partnership pursuant to Article 47, the General Partner has received an incentive fee and (i) the cumulative amount of the Partnership Assets that has been distributed to the Interested Partners pursuant to Article 29 or Article 47 (in the case of in kind distributions, including the Value at the Time of Distribution thereof; in this Article, the same applies) (the “Cumulative Distributed Amount”) is less than the sum of (a) the total Capital Contributions made by the Interested Partners and (b) an amount equal to [O]% thereof (such sum is hereinafter referred to as the “Preferred Distribution Amount”) or (ii) the total incentive fees received by the General Partner (the “Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount”) exceeds [Q]% of the sum of (A) the Cumulative Distributed Amount after thededuction of the total Capital Contributions made by the Interested Partners and (B) the Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount, the General Partner shall promptly return to the Partnership the amount equal to the lesser of (x) the larger of the amounts set forth in the items below or (y) the Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount. Upon payment to the Partnership, such refund (the “Clawback Amount”) shall be allocated to each Interested Partner in proportion to its Interest Amount (for a Withdrawing Partner, the Interest Amount at the time of withdrawal).
5. 【免除/除外条項を設けない場合】第47 条に基づく本組合の清算手続における分配を行う日の時点において、無限責任組合員が成功報酬を受領している場合で、かつ、(ⅰ)第29 条又は第47条に基づき組合員等に対して行われた組合財産の分配額（現物分配の場合にはその分配時評価額を含む。以下本条において同じ。）の累計額（以下「対象分配累計額」という。）が、組合員等によりなされた出資履行金額の総額及び同金額の［α］%に相当する金額の合計額（以下「優先分配金額」という。）を下回るか、又は(ⅱ)無限責任組合員が受領した成功報酬の合計額（以下「対象成功報酬累計額」という。）が、対象分配累計額から組合員等の出資履行金額の合計額を控除した金額及び対象成功報酬累計額の合計額の［β］%を超える場合、無限責任組合員は、(x)以下の各号に定める金額のうちいずれか大きい金額又は(y)対象成功報酬累計額の金額のうち、いずれか小さい金額に相当する額を、本組合に速やかに返還するものとする。かかる返還金（以下「クローバック金額」という。）は、本組合への支払いをもって、各組合員等へその持分金額（脱退組合員については脱退当時の持分金額）に応じ按分の上帰属する。 - 経済産業省 - A person who, at the time of the enforcement of this Act, has been an official (excluding a chairperson and a member of councils, etc. set forth in Article 8 of the National Government Organization Act [Act No. 120 of 1948], a member of the Central Disaster Prevention Council, a chairperson and a member of the Japanese Industrial Standards Committee, and those specified as similar persons by a Cabinet Order) of the prior and existing Prime Minister’s Office, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Ministry of International Trade and Industry, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications, the Ministry of Labor, the Ministry of Construction or the Ministry of Home Affairs (hereinafter referred to as a "Prior and Existing Ministry or Agency" in this Article) shall, unless an appointment is announced separately, become a relevant official of the Cabinet Office, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, or the Ministry of the Environment after the enforcement of this Act (hereinafter referred to as a "New Ministry or Agency" in this Article), or a department or organization established thereunder, which is specified by a Cabinet Order as the New Office or Ministry or the department or organization established thereunder that corresponds to the Former Office or Ministry or the department or organization established thereunder to which said official belongs at the time of the enforcement of this Act, with the same working conditions.
この法律の施行の際現に従前の総理府、法務省、外務省、大蔵省、文部省、厚生省、農林水産省、通商産業省、運輸省、郵政省、労働省、建設省又は自治省（以下この条において「従前の府省」という。）の職員（国家行政組織法（昭和二十三年法律第百二十号）第八条の審議会等の会長又は委員長及び委員、中央防災会議の委員、日本工業標準調査会の会長及び委員並びに これらに類する者として政令で定めるものを除く。）である者は、別に辞令を発せられない限り、同一の勤務条件をもって、この法律の施行後の内閣府、総務省、法務省、外務省、財務省、文部科学省、厚生労働省、農林水産省、経済産業省、国土交通省若しくは環境省（以下この条において「新府省」という。）又はこれに置かれる部局若しくは機関のうち、この法律の施行の際現に当該職員が属する従前の府省又はこれに置かれる部局若しくは機関の相当の新府省又はこれに置かれる部局若しくは機関として政令で定めるものの相当の職員となるものとする。 - 経済産業省 - (3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day.
３ 新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - As a rule, only one view of each invention can be shown in the IPO Gazette illustrations. The selection of that portion of a drawing best calculated to explain the nature of the invention or its specific improvement would be facilitated and the final result improved by judicious execution of a figure with express reference to the IPO Gazette, but which must at the same time serve as one of the figures referred to in the specification. For this purpose the figure may be a plan, elevation, section, or perspective view, according to the judgment of the draftsman. All its parts should be especially open and distinct, with very little or no shading, and it must illustrate only the invention claimed, to the exclusion of all other details. When well executed, it will be used without curtailment or change, but any excessive fineness or crowding or unnecessary elaborateness of detail will necessitate its exclusion from the IPO Gazette.
原則として，各発明について1の図のみをIPO公報に表示することができる。発明の内容又はその具体的な改良点を説明するのに最も適した図面の部分を選択することが望ましく，IPO公報に明確に言及した図を思慮深く作成することにより最終的結果も良いものになる。ただし，これは，同時に，明細書において言及される図の1としても機能するものでなければならない。この目的のため，図は，製図者の判断により，平面図，正面図，断面図又は斜視図にする。図の各部は，特に縁取りをせず，かつ，区別することができるものにし，陰影はなるべく又は全く使用せず，主張する発明のみを例示するものであって，他の一切の要素を除外するものとする。適切に作成された場合は，省略又は変更なく用いるが，過度の微細さ，詰まり過ぎ又は細部の不要な精緻さを伴う場合は，IPO公報から除かれる。 - 特許庁 - (8) The accounting of the government concerning the collection of the Paragraph 1 general contributions pursuant to the provisions of the Act on Asbestos Health Damage Relief (Act No.4 of 2006) shall be performed in the labor insurance special account, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 1 for the time being. In such case, the term "and subsidiary miscellaneous income" in Article 6 shall be changed to read ", the money received from the general account based on the provisions of Article 34 of the Act on Asbestos Health Damage Relief (Act No.4 of 2006), the general contributions set forth in Paragraph 1, Article 35 of the same Act (hereinafter referred to as "general contributions" in this article), and subsidiary miscellaneous income;" and the term ", the collection of labor insurance premiums and," to read ", the returned money of general contributions, the grant to the Incorporated Administrative Agency, Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan, labor insurance premiums and the collection of general contributions, and."
８ 石綿による健康被害の救済に関する法律（平成十八年法律第四号）の規定による第一項一般拠出金の徴収に関する政府の経理は、当分の間、第一条の規定にかかわらず、この会計において行うものとする。この場合において、第六条中「並びに附属雑収入」とあるのは「、石綿による健康被害の救済に関する法律（平成十八年法律第四号）第三十四条の規定に基づく一般会計からの受入金、同法第三十五条第一項の一般拠出金（以下この条において「一般拠出金」という。）並びに附属雑収入」と、「、労働保険料の徴収及び」とあるのは「、一般拠出金の返還金、同法第三十六条の規定による独立行政法人環境再生保全機構への交付金、労働保険料及び一般拠出金の徴収並びに」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) With regard to a person who has received registration as a commodity broker (hereinafter referred to as a "Commodity Broker") pursuant to the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (hereinafter referred to the "Former Act") at the time of the enforcement of this Act, the provisions of the Former Act (excluding Article 42, Article 42-2, Article 44, Article 46, paragraph (2) [limited to the part pertaining to brokerage deposits], Article 47, Article 49 [limited to the parts pertaining to establishment of business offices or offices or addition of Commodities], Article 50, Article 91, paragraph (1) [limited to the parts pertaining to restriction on solicitation of consignment], Article 93, Article 94, and Article 97, and penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall remain in force only for Commodities pertaining to said registration (excluding those pertaining to the license under Article 41, paragraph (1) of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision [hereinafter referred to as the "New Act"] the same shall apply hereinafter), for three years from the effective date of this Act.
２ この法律の施行の際現に改正前の商品取引所法（以下「旧法」という。）の規定による商品仲買人の登録を受けている者（以下「商品仲買人」という。）については、当該登録に係る商品（改正後の商品取引所法（以下新法」という。）第四十一条第一項の許可に係るものを除く。以下同じ。）に限り、この法律の施行の日から三年間は、旧法（第四十二条、第四十二条の二、第四十四条、第四十六条第二項（仲買保証金に係る部分に限る。）、第四十七条、第四十九条（営業所若しくは事務所の設置又は商品の追加に係る部分に限る。）、第五十条、第九十一条第一項（委託の勧誘の制限に係る部分に限る。）、第九十三条、第九十四条及び第九十七条並びにこれらの規定に係る罰則を除く。）の規定は、なおその効力を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (5) A foreign financial institution, etc. that seeks the application of the provision of paragraph (1) shall, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, submit a written application stating that it seeks the application of the provision of the said paragraph with respect to the specified interest receivable, as well as its name and the location of its head office or principal office (or any other place specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance in the case of a foreign corporation having permanent establishments in Japan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance (hereinafter referred to in this Article as a "written application for tax exemption"), no later than the day preceding the day on which the foreign financial institution, etc. is to receive payment for the first time, via the person who pays the specified interest, to the competent district director having jurisdiction over the place for tax payment pursuant to the provision of Article 17 of the Income Tax Act which pertains to the person who makes payment in terms of the said specified interest (in the case where another place has been designated pursuant to the provision of Article 18(2) of the said Act: the designated place for tax payment).
５ 第一項の規定の適用を受けようとする外国金融機関等は、政令で定めるところにより、その支払を受けるべき特定利子につき同項の規定の適用を受けようとする旨、その者の名称及び本店又は主たる事務所の所在地（国内に恒久的施設を有する外国法人にあつては、財務省令で定める場所。以下この条において同じ。）その他の財務省令で定める事項を記載した申告書（以下この条において「非課税適用申告書」という。）を、最初にその支払を受けるべき日の前日までに、その特定利子の支払をする者を経由してその支払をする者の当該特定利子に係る所得税法第十七条の規定による納税地（同法第十八条第二項の規定による指定があつた場合には、その指定をされた納税地）の所轄税務署長に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (i) Where redemption is made after the redemption date: Out of the income tax collected on said discount bonds pursuant to the provisions of Article 41-12, paragraph (3) of the Act (where the amount of said income tax is not clear, the amount obtained by deducting the issue price, etc. on the final issue date for said discount bonds from the face value of said discount bonds and then multiplying the remaining amount after deduction (where said discount bonds are issued outside Japan by a foreign corporation, the amount specified by Cabinet Order, prescribed in said paragraph) by the rate of income tax on profit from redemption for said discount bonds collected at the time of issuance pursuant to the provisions of said paragraph; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), the amount corresponding to the period during which a domestic corporation or trustee prescribed in Article 41-12, paragraph (6) of the Act (hereinafter referred to as a "non-taxable corporation, etc." in this Article) held said discount bonds
一 その償還期限後において償還する場合 当該割引債につき法第四十一条の十二第三項の規定により徴収された所得税の額（当該所得税の額が明らかでないときは、当該割引債の券面金額から当該割引債に係る最終発行日における発行価額等を控除した残額（当該割引債が外国法人が国外において発行したものであるときは、同項に規定する政令で定める金額）に、当該割引債の発行の際に同項の規定により当該割引債に係る償還差益について徴収された所得税の税率を乗じて計算した金額。以下この条において同じ。）のうち、法第四十一条の十二第六項に規定する内国法人又は受託者（以下この条において「非課税法人等」という。）が当該割引債を所有していた期間に対応する部分の金額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 12 (1) In the event the volume of Oil Gas held by the Oil Gas Importer (means the volume of Oil Gas held by the Oil Gas Importer in compliance with the provisions of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry as provided in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article. Hereinafter the same in this Article) is less than the standard stockpiles and if the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry determines that there is no good reason for such shortage, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry may recommend such Oil Gas Importer to have and maintain Oil Gas in accordance with the provisions of the said paragraph within a set period of time, except in the case where such Oil Gas Importer obtains the approval as set forth in paragraph (2) of Article 8 applied mutatis mutandis in paragraph (2) of the preceding Article, and the total volume of Oil Gas held by such Oil Gas Importer and other Oil Gas Importers who also obtain such approval together with such Oil Gas Importer is equal to or more than the total volume of their standard stockpiles.
第十二条 経済産業大臣は、石油ガス輸入業者の石油ガス保有量（石油ガス輸入業者が前条第一項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより保有する石油ガスの数量をいう。以下この条において同じ。）が基準備蓄量に達していない場合において、その達していないことについて正当な理由がないと認めるときは、その石油ガス輸入業者に対し、期限を定めて、同項の規定に従つて石油ガスを保有すべきことを勧告することができる。ただし、その石油ガス輸入業者が前条第二項において準用する第八条第二項の規定による確認を受けている場合において、その者及びその者とともにその確認を受けている他の石油ガス輸入業者の石油ガス保有量を合計した数量がこれらの者の基準備蓄量を合計した数量以上であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) Persons who are actually carrying on Specified Insurance Business at the time when this Act enters into force (except for persons who are provided for in the preceding paragraph, persons who are listed in the items of Article 5, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions, and persons who have received the disposition of a license as set forth in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the of the Current Insurance Business Act or who have received the disposition of refusal of registration as set forth in Article 272, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter referred to as "Specified Insurers") shall transfer the insurance contract of which the person manages the business and property pursuant to the contract with an Insurance Company (including a Foreign Insurance Company, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, or entrust the management of the business and property pertaining to such insurance contract pursuant to the contract with an Insurance Company or Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider corresponding with cases listed in the items of paragraph (1), after the date specified by the items and until one year from the date specified by the items.
３ この法律の施行の際現に特定保険業を行っている者（前項に規定する者及び附則第五条第一項各号に掲げる者並びに新保険業法第三条第一項の免許又は新保険業法第二百七十二条第一項の登録を受けている者を除く。以下「特定保険業者」という。）は、第一項各号に掲げる場合に応じ、当該各号に定める日後においては、当該各号に定める日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間に、その業務及び財産の管理を行う保険契約について、保険会社（外国保険会社等を含む。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは少額短期保険業者との契約により当該保険契約を移転し、又は保険会社若しくは少額短期保険業者との契約により当該保険契約に係る業務及び財産の管理の委託を行わなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 52-14 (1) The Prime Minister may, when and to the extent that he/she finds it particularly necessary for ensuring sound and appropriate management of the business of a Bank in light of the status of business or property (in the case that the Major Shareholder of Bank is a company or any other juridical person, it shall include the status of property of Subsidiary Companies of that Major Shareholder of the Bank or any other companies that have a special relationship specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance with that Major Shareholder of Bank) of the Major Shareholder of Bank (limited to a person who holds more than five hundredths of the Voting Rights Held by All of the Shareholders of the Bank; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), request the Major Shareholder of Bank to submit an improvement plan for securing the soundness in management of the Bank or order amendment of the submitted improvement plan by designating matters for which measures should be taken and the time limit therefor, or may order, within the limit necessary, measures necessary for the purpose of supervision.
第五十二条の十四 内閣総理大臣は、銀行主要株主（銀行の総株主の議決権の百分の五十を超える議決権の保有者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）の業務又は財産の状況（銀行主要株主が会社その他の法人である場合にあつては、当該銀行主要株主の子会社その他の当該銀行主要株主と内閣府令で定める特殊の関係のある会社の財産の状況を含む。）に照らして、当該銀行の業務の健全かつ適切な運営を確保するため特に必要があると認めるときは、その必要の限度において、当該銀行主要株主に対し、措置を講ずべき事項及び期限を示して、当該銀行の経営の健全性を確保するための改善計画の提出を求め、若しくは提出された改善計画の変更を命じ、又はその必要の限度において監督上必要な措置を命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - While my predecessor was in office, a law called the SME Financing Facilitation Act (Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc.) was established. In Japan, 99.7% of all companies are small and medium-sized enterprises, or SMEs, which employ 28 million people. Now, faced with growing economic globalization, especially since the Lehman crisis two years ago, SMEs have been suffering considerably from hardships. At the same time, though, SMEs have the advantage of being flexible and resilient and, from the viewpoint, the FSA considers SMEs to be extremely important. My hometown is the city of Kitakyushu, where Yahata Steel Works, initially a government-owned company, was founded 100 years ago, and served as the base for the creation of a large number of SMEs there. Fukuoka Prefecture, also home to factories of Toyota and Nissan, is the second-largest car-producing prefecture after Aichi, which explains the large number of modest-size companies and SMEs there.
それは前大臣のときに、中小企業金融円滑化法というのをつくりまして、そんなところで一生懸命中小企業に対する融資というのは、まあ、企業の99.7％、2,800万人の方が中小企業で従事しておられるわけですから、今こういった経済のグローバル化の中、ましてや2年前のリーマンショック以来、非常に中小企業というのはあえいでおりますし、しかし同時に中小企業は機動性あるいは弾力性といった利点もあるわけですから、そういった中で中小企業を金融庁は極めて大事だと思っておりますが、私はいつか話したと思いますが、私は地元に帰って、私は北九州市ですから中小企業、まあ官営八幡製鐵所が100年前にできまして、それをすそ野として福岡県はトヨタも日産も、愛知県に続いて2番目の自動車生産県でございますので、たくさんの中堅企業あるいは中小企業が多いわけです。 - 金融庁 - (2) With regard to a person who has received registration as a commodity broker (hereinafter referred to as a "Commodity Broker") pursuant to the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (hereinafter referred to the "Old Act") at the time of the enforcement of this Act, the provisions of the Old Act (excluding Article 42, Article 42-2, Article 44, Article 46, paragraph 2 [limited to the part pertaining to brokerage deposits], Article 47, Article 49 [limited to the parts pertaining to establishment of business offices or offices or addition of Commodities], Article 50, Article 91, paragraph 1 [limited to the parts pertaining to restriction on solicitation of consignment], Article 93, Article 94, and Article 97, and penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall remain in force only for Commodities pertaining to said registration (excluding those pertaining to the license under Article 41, paragraph 1 of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision [hereinafter referred to as the "New Act"] the same shall apply hereinafter), for three years from the effective date of this Act.
２ この法律の施行の際現に改正前の商品取引所法（以下「旧法」という。）の規定による商品仲買人の登録を受けている者（以下「商品仲買人」という。）については、当該登録に係る商品（改正後の商品取引所法（以下新法」という。）第四十一条第一項の許可に係るものを除く。以下同じ。）に限り、この法律の施行の日から三年間は、旧法（第四十二条、第四十二条の二、第四十四条、第四十六条第二項（仲買保証金に係る部分に限る。）、第四十七条、第四十九条（営業所若しくは事務所の設置又は商品の追加に係る部分に限る。）、第五十条、第九十一条第一項（委託の勧誘の制限に係る部分に限る。）、第九十三条、第九十四条及び第九十七条並びにこれらの規定に係る罰則を除く。）の規定は、なおその効力を有する。 - 経済産業省 - When the SME Financing Facilitation Act was established just after the Lehman shock two years ago, it was given the duration of roughly one year. With Toyota suffering a 40 percent drop in car sales two years ago – my home prefecture, Fukuoka, Kyushu, produces more than one million cars and is the second largest car-producing prefecture after Aichi – one after another of the car makers, including Toyota and Nissan, fired temporary workers. It was under those circumstances that we launched this Act, but, at the same time, it is also true that in the context of a capitalist society and a free society, there is a concern that the Act might result in financial discipline deteriorating in the form of moral hazard on the part of borrowers. As it is, indeed, naturally an important factor in a free society, and the basic rule in borrowing money is to pay it back with interest, I do think it necessary to heed any impact of the Act.
今般、同法の期限の延長期間を1年としたのは、法制当時よりも現在の経済状況は2年前のリーマン・ショック直後の中小企業金融円滑化法は1年程度の法律としていたのでありますが、現在の経済情勢は2年前のまさにトヨタ自動車の売り上げが4割減ったという、私の地元九州・福岡県は愛知県に次いで2番目に大きな自動車100万台以上生産しておりますけれども、トヨタだ日産だというのが本当に軒並み派遣切りをしまして、そのことを私はもろに感じたわけでございますが、そういった中、この法律を施行させて頂いたわけでございますけれども、同時に資本主義社会、自由主義社会においては、法によって借り手のモラルハザードという金融規律の低下が懸念されている。やっぱりそこは、当然、自由主義社会で大事なことでございまして、やっぱり借りたお金は利子をつけて返すということは原則でございますから、その影響も注視する必要があると思っております。 - 金融庁 - (2) The preceding paragraph shall not apply to cases where the Trust Company has delegated trust business to any of the third parties listed in the following items (in the case of the third party listed in item (i) or (ii), limited to a party having a close shareholding or personnel relationship with the settlor as specified by a Cabinet Order and not having a close shareholding or personnel relationship with the trustee as specified by a Cabinet Order); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the Trust Company knows that the delegated party is unsuitable or untrustworthy or that the delegated party is not carrying out the delegated trust business appropriately, and fails to notify the beneficiaries (in cases where a beneficiary has a trust manager or agent at that time, including said trust manager or agent; the same shall apply in item (iii) of this paragraph, Article 29-3 and Article 51(1)(v)) thereof, fails to cancel the delegation to the delegated party, or fails to take any other necessary measures:
２ 信託会社が信託業務を次に掲げる第三者（第一号又は第二号にあっては、株式の所有関係又は人的関係において、委託者と密接な関係を有する者として政令で定める者に該当し、かつ、受託者と密接な関係を有する者として政令で定める者に該当しない者に限る。）に委託したときは、前項の規定は、適用しない。ただし、信託会社が、当該委託先が不適任若しくは不誠実であること又は当該委託先が委託された信託業務を的確に遂行していないことを知りながら、その旨の受益者（信託管理人又は受益者代理人が現に存する場合にあっては、当該信託管理人又は受益者代理人を含む。第三号、第二十九条の三及び第五十一条第一項第五号において同じ。）に対する通知、当該委託先への委託の解除その他の必要な措置をとることを怠ったときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
- 金融庁
- Copyright(C) 2026 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
- ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
- 特許庁
- Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
- 経済産業省
- Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
