「this time」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(681ページ目)

「this time」を含む例文一覧(34170)

＜前へ 1 2 .... 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 次へ＞

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day.
第百二条　第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
As the issue of financing is involved, the most important thing to do with regard to this bill is to provide appropriate damage compensation to local residents. Also important is the stable supply of electricity, which is essential to industrial activity. Unless the stable supply of electricity is ensured - Tokyo Electric Power is calling for a 15 % cut in electricity usage - GDP will decline considerably. In that sense, from my experience of serving as Parliamentary Vice Minister for International Trade and Industry about 21 years ago, I know that the stable supply of electricity is very important. In particular, the semiconductor industry, which consumes a huge amount of electricity, uses clean rooms that would malfunction if the supply of electricity is suspended even for eight hours. There are many industries like this. Once the supply of electricity is suspended, it may take a very long time to start up again in some cases. In the semiconductor industry, if clean rooms become dirty, tiny circuits on semiconductor chips would short-circuit. Then, they would become useless.
そういう経緯・経過がありまして、やはりこれは金融の問題が絡んできますから、そういった意味で、まず何といっても、本法案は東京電力の賠償問題についての、地元の方々への迅速かつ適切な損害賠償の実施ということが一番大事です。それからまた、電力の安定的な供給、これはまさに産業の米の一つですから、やはりこれが安定的に供給されませんと、東京電力は15％計画停電としましたけれども、これでもだいぶGDPが落ちています。そういった意味で、やはり電力の安定供給というのは、私も、21年ぐらい前に通産政務次官をさせていただきましたけれども、基本的に非常に大事なのです。特に半導体産業などは電力消費産業ですが、あれはクリーンルームでやりまして、途中、電気が8時間でも切れますと、クリーンルームがうまく機能しなくなるのです。そういう産業というのは、結構多いのです。途中で電力が中断しますと、これはまた立ち上げるのに非常に時間がかかったり、それから半導体などは、クリーンルームが汚れてきますと、あれは小さいから、半導体の小さな回路と回路の間がみんなショートするのです。そうすると、これは使い物にならなくなるのです。 - 金融庁
(8) The provisions of paragraphs 3 through 5 above shall apply mutatis mutandis to leave taken by an employee prescribed in Article 4 paragraph 1 of the Local Public Service Act (Act No. 261 of 1950) (excluding part-time personnel who do not hold an official post with short working hours prescribed in Article 28-5 paragraph 1 of the same Act, the same shall apply hereinafter in this Article), for the purpose of taking care of his/her Family Member in Care-requiring Condition. In this case, the term "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries or a person to whom the Minister, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, delegates the authority prescribed in Article 4 of the Special Wage Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, etc.")" in paragraph 3 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6 paragraph 1 of the Local Public Service Act (Act No. 261 of 1950) (or the municipal board of education with regard to the educational personnel whose wages are paid by a prefectural government prescribed in Article 37 paragraph 1 of the Act on the Organization and Operation of Local Educational Administration (Act No. 162 of 1956), the same shall apply hereinafter)"; and the term "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, etc." in paragraph 5 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6 paragraph 1 of the Local Public Service Act."
８　第三項から第五項までの規定は、地方公務員法（昭和二十五年法律第二百六十一号）第四条第一項に規定する職員（同法第二十八条の五第一項に規定する短時間勤務の職を占める職員以外の非常勤職員を除く。以下この条において同じ。）がその要介護家族の介護をするための休業について準用する。この場合において、第三項中「給特法第四条に規定する農林水産大臣又は政令の定めるところによりその委任を受けた者（以下「農林水産大臣等」という。）」とあるのは「地方公務員法（昭和二十五年法律第二百六十一号）第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者（地方教育行政の組織及び運営に関する法律（昭和三十一年法律第百六十二号）第三十七条第一項に規定する県費負担教職員については、市町村の教育委員会。以下同じ。）」と、第五項中「農林水産大臣等」とあるのは「地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 130 (1) The provision of Article 97-2, paragraph (2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 199 of the Insurance Business Act revised by the provision of Article 22 (hereinafter referred to as "Current Insurance Business Act") of the Current Insurance Business Act shall not apply, for a period of one year counting from the Effective Date, to the investment of assets on behalf of one single person (referring to the one single person prescribed in Article 97-2, paragraph (2) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) by an Insurance Company (referring to an Insurance Company as defined in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) (including a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (referring to a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (7) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) or a Licensed Specified Juridical Person (referring to a Licensed Specified Juridical Person as defined in Article 223, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), where the amount of those assets prescribed in Article 97-2, paragraph (2) of the Current Insurance Business Act which are invested by the Insurance Company on behalf of that one single person exceeds, at the time when this Act enters into force, the amount calculated pursuant to the provision of that paragraph, provided that the Insurance Company notify thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission within three months from the Effective Date.
第百三十条　第二十二条の規定による改正後の保険業法（以下「新保険業法」という。）第九十七条の二第二項（新保険業法第百九十九条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に同一人（新保険業法第九十七条の二第二項に規定する同一人をいう。次項において同じ。）に対する同条第二項に規定する資産の運用の額が同項の規定により計算した額を超えている保険会社（新保険業法第二条第二項に規定する保険会社をいう。以下同じ。）（外国保険会社等（新保険業法第二条第七項に規定する外国保険会社等をいう。以下同じ。）及び免許特定法人（新保険業法第二百二十三条第一項に規定する免許特定法人をいう。以下同じ。）を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の当該同一人に対する当該資産の運用については、当該保険会社が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(9) For the time being, the State may, within the scope of the budget, provide a loan without interest of an amount equivalent to the amount that the State may subsidize pursuant to the provisions of Article 75, paragraph (2) (in the case where any law or ordinance stipulates otherwise with regard to the proportion of subsidy by the State under these provisions, they shall include the provisions of said law or ordinance that stipulates otherwise; the same shall apply hereinafter) to a prefecture (in the case where the affairs under Article 74, paragraph (1), which are to be processed by a prefecture, are to be processed by a designated city, etc., pursuant to the provisions of Article 84-2, paragraph (1), this shall include said designated city, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and paragraphs (12) to (14) of the Supplementary Provisions) for the funds to be allocated to the expenses subsidized by said prefecture for the establisher of a public assistance facility other than said prefecture, with regard to a repair, renovation or expansion of a public assistance facility of which expenses may be subsidized by the State pursuant to the provisions of Article 75, paragraph (2) and which falls under Article 2, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Promotion of Social Infrastructure Development Through Use of Proceeds from Sale of the Stock of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Act No. 86 of 1987).
９　国は、当分の間、都道府県（第八十四条の二第一項の規定により、都道府県が処理することとされている第七十四条第一項の事務を指定都市等が処理する場合にあつては、当該指定都市等を含む。以下この項及び附則第十二項から第十四項までにおいて同じ。）に対し、第七十五条第二項の規定により国がその費用について補助することができる保護施設の修理、改造又は拡張で日本電信電話株式会社の株式の売払収入の活用による社会資本の整備の促進に関する特別措置法（昭和六十二年法律第八十六号）第二条第一項第二号に該当するものにつき、都道府県以外の保護施設の設置者に対し当該都道府県が補助する費用に充てる資金について、予算の範囲内において、第七十五条第二項の規定（この規定による国の補助の割合について、この規定と異なる定めをした法令の規定がある場合には、当該異なる定めをした法令の規定を含む。以下同じ。）により国が補助することができる金額に相当する金額を無利子で貸し付けることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) In the case where a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. has been subject to two or more foreign corporation taxes or to a foreign corporation tax twice or more on its income for a taxable business year, when a consolidated corporation related to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. seeks the application of the provisions of Article 68-91(1) (including the cases where it is applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article by deeming the amount to be as specified therein; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or Article 66-7(1) (including the cases where it is applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article by deeming the amount to be as specified therein; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) of the Act in two or more business years or consolidated business years; with respect to the application of the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act for a consolidated business year following the first one of the said two or more consolidated business years or business years, the amount obtained by deducting the amount listed in item (ii) (the amount listed in item (iii), when seeking the application of the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act for the first time after receiving the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act) from the amount listed in item (i) shall be deemed to be the calculated amount prescribed in the preceding paragraph:
２　特定外国子会社等につきその課税対象年度の所得に対して二以上の外国法人税が課され、又は二回以上にわたつて外国法人税が課された場合において、当該特定外国子会社等に係る連結法人がその二以上の連結事業年度又は事業年度において法第六十八条の九十一第一項（同条第二項の規定によりみなして適用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）又は第六十六条の七第一項（同条第二項の規定によりみなして適用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の規定の適用を受けるときは、当該二以上の連結事業年度又は事業年度のうち最初の連結事業年度又は事業年度後の連結事業年度に係る法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定の適用については、第一号に掲げる金額から第二号に掲げる金額（法第六十六条の七第一項の規定の適用を受けた場合で、その適用を受けた後最初に法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定の適用を受けるときは、第三号に掲げる金額）を控除した金額をもつて前項に規定する計算した金額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 9 (1) In the event the volume of oil held by the Oil Refiner (means the volume of oil held by the Oil Refiner, in compliance with the provisions of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry as provided in paragraph (1) of Article 6; provided, however, that, in the event such Oil Refiner, holds crude oil in lieu of the Designated Oil Products pursuant the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article, such volume of oil means the volume of oil after the conversion of the volume of such crude oil into the volume of the Designated Oil Products in such a method as provided in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry set forth in the said paragraph. Hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) is less than the standard stockpiles and if the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry determines that there is no justifiable reason for such shortage, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry may recommend that such Oil Refiner, have oil complying with the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 6 within a set period of time; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where such Oil Refiner, obtains confirmation as set forth in paragraph (2) of the preceding Article, and the total volume of Oil held by such Oil Refiner, and other Oil Refiners, who also obtain such confirmation together with such Oil Refiner, is equal to or more than the total volume of their standard stockpiles.
第九条　経済産業大臣は、石油精製業者等の石油保有量（石油精製業者等が第六条第一項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより保有する石油の数量をいう。ただし、その石油精製業者等が同条第二項の規定により指定石油製品に代えて原油を保有する場合には、当該原油の数量を同項の経済産業省令で定める方式で指定石油製品の数量に換算した後の石油の数量をいう。以下この条において同じ。）が基準備蓄量に達していない場合において、その達していないことについて正当な理由がないと認めるときは、その石油精製業者等に対し、期限を定めて、第六条第一項の規定に従つて石油を保有すべきことを勧告することができる。ただし、その石油精製業者等が前条第二項の規定による確認を受けている場合において、その石油精製業者等及びその石油精製業者等とともにその確認を受けている他の石油精製業者等の石油保有量を合計した数量がこれらの者の基準備蓄量を合計した数量以上であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(i) if the Limited Partner reasonably determines that the contribution under the Capital Call Notice for such Portfolio Investment probably will result in its violation of any law, rule or regulation or its internal investment policies (limited to those policies that it has notified the General Partner of at the time of its admission to the Partnership) or any other material adverse effect on it and such Limited Partner requests that the General Partner discharge it from the obligation to make such contribution; provided that the Limited Partner shall (I)(a) give a written notice of its request under item (i) of this paragraph and (b) submit an opinion of legal counsel (such legal counsel and contents of its opinion shall be reasonably satisfactory to the General Partner and address the Limited Partner’s determination under item (i) of this paragraph), to the General Partner within [__] days from receipt of the Capital Call Notice (or any later date as the General Partner determines in its discretion), and (II) provide any other information regarding the probability of a material adverse effect as the General Partner reasonably requests; or
① 当該有限責任組合員が、当該ポートフォリオ投資に係る追加出資請求通知において示された出資をなすことが、当該有限責任組合員に対し、法令又は投資に関する内部規則（但し、本組合加入時に無限責任組合員に通知されたものに限る。）の違反その他の重大な悪影響を生じさせる蓋然性があると合理的に判断し、無限責任組合員に対して出資義務の免除を請求した場合。但し、当該有限責任組合員が出資義務を免れるためには、当該有限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)無限責任組合員に対し、当該追加出資請求通知の到達の日から［］日以内（又はその後の日で無限責任組合員がその裁量により決定する日まで）に、(1)本項第①号に基づく請求を行う旨書面により通知し、(2)法律顧問の意見書（当該法律顧問及び意見書の内容は無限責任組合員が合理的に満足できるもので、本項第①号に定める趣旨の、有限責任組合員の判断に関するものでなければならない。）を提出し、かつ、(ⅱ)無限責任組合員が合理的に要求する、当該重大な悪影響を生じさせる蓋然性についてのその他の情報を提供しなければならない。 - 経済産業省
(5) If the General Partner makes a distribution in kind pursuant to paragraph (3) of this Article, the General Partner shall request the Partners who are entitled to such distribution in kind to elect to either (A) receive the Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind or (B) request to the General Partner the disposition of all or part of such Portfolio Securities and to receive the proceeds of such disposition, no later than [_] days prior to the Reference Date. With respect to any Partners who communicate their intention to receive the proceeds of disposition in accordance with (B) within [_] days from such request, the General Partner shall deliver such disposition proceeds by the date of the distribution in kind after the disposition of the Portfolio Securities at such time and price as the General Partners determines in its discretion (provided that, as a general rule, such price shall be the closing price (or an equivalent price) on any day during the period from the date such communication has been made through the date of distribution in kind). In any other case, the General Partner shall distribute the Portfolio Securities in kind. The expenses incurred in connection with the General Partner’s disposition of Portfolio Securities pursuant to this paragraph shall be borne by the Partners who desire such disposition.
5. 無限責任組合員は、本条第3 項に基づき現物による分配を行う場合、現物分配基準日の少なくとも［］日前までに、当該現物分配の対象である組合員に対し、(A)分配の対象となる投資証券等を現物で受け取る方法、又は(B)当該投資証券等の全部若しくは一部の処分を無限責任組合員に依頼し、当該処分に係る処分代金を受け取る方法のいずれかを選択するよう申し出るものとする。無限責任組合員は、かかる申出から［］日以内に(B)の方法による処分代金の受領を希望する旨の連絡があった組合員については、無限責任組合員がその裁量により判断する時期及び価格（但し、当該連絡のあった日から現物分配を行う日までの任意の日における最終価格又はこれに準ずる価格を原則とする。）によって当該投資証券等を処分の上、現物分配を行う日にその処分代金を交付するものとし、その他の場合については、当該投資証券等の現物を交付するものとする。本項に基づく無限責任組合員による投資証券等の処分に関して発生した費用は処分を希望した組合員が負担する。 - 経済産業省
Article 40 (1) Where a person conducting Multilevel Marketing concludes a Multilevel Marketing Contract pertaining to the Multilevel Marketing, the counterparty of such Multilevel Marketing Contract (limited to an individual who sells or mediates sales of Goods or offers or mediates offers of services pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing by means other than through a Store, etc.; hereinafter referred to as a "New Multilevel Marketing Distributor") may rescind such Multilevel Marketing Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received the document referred to in Article 37 (2) (where the specified burden involved in such Multilevel Marketing Contract is the purchase of the Goods [excluding rights to use a facility or to receive offers of services; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item] to be resold and if the date of the first delivery of the Goods purchased based on such Multilevel Marketing Contract is after such date of receipt, it shall be such date of first delivery; the same shall apply in Article 41 (1)) (if the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor had not rescinded the Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by the Supervisor's or the solicitor's act, in violation of the provision of Article 34 (1), or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act, in violation of Article 34 (2), of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Supervisor's, the solicitor's, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act of intimidating the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor in violation of the provision of Article 34 (3), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received a document, which has been issued by Supervisor, the solicitor, or the general multilevel marketing distributor pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor may rescind said Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting such Multilevel Marketing may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of such Multilevel Marketing Contract.
第四十条　連鎖販売業を行う者がその連鎖販売業に係る連鎖販売契約を締結した場合におけるその連鎖販売契約の相手方（その連鎖販売業に係る商品の販売若しくはそのあつせん又は役務の提供若しくはそのあつせんを店舗等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この章において「連鎖販売加入者」という。）は、第三十七条第二項の書面を受領した日（その連鎖販売契約に係る特定負担が再販売をする商品（施設を利用し及び役務の提供を受ける権利を除く。以下この項において同じ。）の購入についてのものである場合において、その連鎖販売契約に基づき購入したその商品につき最初の引渡しを受けた日がその受領した日後であるときは、その引渡しを受けた日。次条第一項において同じ。）から起算して二十日を経過したとき（連鎖販売加入者が、統括者若しくは勧誘者が第三十四条第一項の規定に違反し若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第二項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は統括者、勧誘者若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該連鎖販売加入者が、その連鎖販売業に係る統括者、勧誘者又は一般連鎖販売業者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき）を除き、書面によりその連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その連鎖販売業を行う者は、その連鎖販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
As individual ministries and agencies have maintained strong powers in their areas of jurisdiction over the 65 years since the end of World War II, politicians, even the Prime Ministers, did not succeed in tearing down the wall of sectionalism. Mr. Yoshiro Mori (a former Prime Minister) supported the umbrella organization for kindergartens, while nursery schools basically had the support of Mr. Ryutaro Hashimoto. As nursery schools were divided into two groups, Mr. Hashimoto supported one of them and I supported the other. From my experience, I know that there was fierce sectionalism during the era of LDP government and the wall that separated ministries was really thick. I have the impression, based on my experience of spending my time in a governing party, an opposition party and a governing party again, that that situation has eventually led to the change of government. While I am ready to accept criticism straightforwardly, I believe that this must be done from the standpoint of the people following the change of government.
ですから、やっぱり日本国も戦後65年たちまして、各省庁が縦割りで物凄い権限を持っており、総理大臣をした政治家でもうまくいかなかったのです。幼稚園連盟の方の応援団長は森喜朗さんで、保育園の方は基本的に橋本龍太郎さんでした。保育園は2つに分かれていましたから、橋本龍太郎さんと私がやっていました。私の経験として、自由民主党の時代は縦割り行政というのは凄まじく、本当に役所の壁というのは厚かったのです。それが結局、政権交代に結びついたというようなところも、私は現実に与党、野党、与党を経験した人間としてあると思います。国民目線に対して、色々と政権交代を、ご批判されることもありますし、ご批判は率直に受けますけれども、やはりそういったことは、今の政権交代でやっていくべきことだと思っています。 - 金融庁
In any case, Mr. Tanabe, a former official of the Bank of Japan, has been appointed as the new governor of DIC. During the previous Diet session, I heard Mr. Tanabe, who was not yet the DIC governor at that time, speak before the House of Councillors’ Financial Affairs Committee. His remarks sounded very reasonable and I found him to be well versed in financial affairs and a man of great character. Therefore, I nominated him as the governor. Since his appointment was approved by the Diet, I hear that he has been leading DIC with strong enthusiasm and conscientious dedication. In any case, I understand that DIC will consider this matter appropriately in accordance with law.
いずれにいたしましても、詳細については今鋭意、非常に熱心に田辺さんに（預金保険機構の）新理事長になって頂きました。私は、田辺さんと実は前の国会のときに参議院の財政金融委員会で横の席で、当時は理事長ではございませんでしたけれども、発言を聞かせて頂いておりまして、非常にしっかりした発言をされて、日本銀行出身だという話でございましたが、金融のことを非常によくご存じで、人格も立派な人だと、こう思って私は理事長に推挽（すいばん）させて頂いたわけでございます。国会で認めて頂きまして、お聞きすると非常に熱心に一生懸命、預金保険機構を率いておられるという話を仄聞（そくぶん）いたしておりますので、いずれにいたしましても、きちっと法律に基づいて預金保険機構において検討されていくものというふうに承知をいたしております。 - 金融庁
(6) Any resolution pertaining to the reduction of the capital, etc. under Article 447, paragraph (1) (Reductions in Amount of Capital) or Article 448, paragraph (1) (Reductions in Amount of Reserves) of the Companies Act shall be invalid if the number of Policyholders who have raised their objections within the period set forth in paragraph (2), item (iii) (excluding the holders of policies under which Insurance Claims, etc. had already arisen at the time of public notice under that paragraph (but limited to those policies that would be terminated with the payment of the Insurance Claims, etc.); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph, as well as in paragraph (4) of the following Article) exceeds one fifth of the total number of Policyholders, and the amount specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as the credits (excluding Insurance Claims, etc.) belonging to the insurance contracts of the Policyholders who have stated such objections exceeds one fifth of the total amount of credits belonging to the Policyholders.
６　第二項第三号の期間内に異議を述べた保険契約者（同項の規定による公告の時において既に保険金請求権等が生じている保険契約（当該保険金請求権等に係る支払により消滅することとなるものに限る。）に係る保険契約者を除く。以下この項及び次条第四項において同じ。）の数が保険契約者の総数の五分の一を超え、かつ、当該異議を述べた保険契約者の保険契約に係る債権（保険金請求権等を除く。）の額に相当する金額として内閣府令で定める金額が保険契約者の当該金額の総額の五分の一を超えるときは、資本金等の額の減少に係る会社法第四百四十七条第一項（資本金の額の減少）又は第四百四十八条第一項（準備金の額の減少）の決議は、効力を有しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 77 A Foreign Mutual Company that has obtained the license set forth in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act by the time when this Act enters into force shall be deemed to continue its transactions in Japan pursuant to the provision of Article 479, paragraph (1) (Business Offices of Foreign Company) of the Commercial Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 193 of the Current Act; the matters registered by the Foreign Mutual Company pursuant to the provisions of Article 45, paragraph (3) (Registration of Formation of Juridical Person) and Article 46 (Matters to be Registered upon Registration of Formation and Registration of Change) of the Civil Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 49, paragraph (1) (Registration of Foreign Juridical Person) of said Code shall be deemed to have been registered pursuant to the provisions of Article 479, paragraphs (3) and (4) of the Commercial Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 193 of the Current Act.
第七十七条　この法律の施行の際現に旧外国保険事業者法第三条第一項の免許を受けている外国相互会社は、新法第百九十三条において準用する商法第四百七十九条第一項（外国会社の営業所）の規定により日本において取引を継続しているものとみなし、当該外国相互会社が民法第四十九条第一項（外国法人の登記）において準用する同法第四十五条第三項（法人の設立の登記等）及び第四十六条（設立の登記の登記事項及び変更の登記等）の規定により登記している事項は、新法第百九十三条において準用する商法第四百七十九条第二項及び第三項の規定による登記がされているものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 72 (1) With regard to a Long-Term Care Health Facility or Sanatorium Medical Facility for the Elderly Requiring Long-Term Care when it is approved as set forth in Article 94, paragraph (1) or appointed as set forth in Article 48, paragraph (1), item (iii), it shall be deemed that the organizer of said Long-Term Care Health Facility or Sanatorium Medical Facility for the Elderly Requiring Long-Term Care shall be appointed as set forth in the main clause of Article 41, paragraph (1) pertaining to In-Home Service (limited to Short-Term Admission for Recuperation or a type of In-Home Service as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare) provided by said Long-Term Care Health Facility or Sanatorium Medical Facility for the Elderly Requiring Long-Term Care at the time of said approval or appointment as service provider, however, provided that this provision shall not apply when the organizer of said Long-Term Care Health Facility or Sanatorium Medical Facility for the Elderly Requiring Long-Term Care offers a different notification pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare.
第七十二条　介護老人保健施設又は介護療養型医療施設について、第九十四条第一項の許可又は第四十八条第一項第三号の指定があったときは、その許可又は指定の時に、当該介護老人保健施設又は介護療養型医療施設の開設者について、当該介護老人保健施設又は介護療養型医療施設により行われる居宅サービス（短期入所療養介護その他厚生労働省令で定める居宅サービスの種類に限る。）に係る第四十一条第一項本文の指定があったものとみなす。ただし、当該介護老人保健施設又は介護療養型医療施設の開設者が、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、別段の申出をしたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 101 (1) Where a bankruptcy creditor who filed a proof of claim for salary or claim for retirement allowance, both of which are preferred bankruptcy claims, is likely to have difficulties in maintaining his/her living standards unless he/she receives payment of these bankruptcy claims, the court, before permission is granted for the first time for the final distribution prescribed in Article 195(1), simplified distribution prescribed in Article 204(1), consensual distribution prescribed in Article 208(1) or interim distribution prescribed in Article 209(1), upon the petition of a bankruptcy trustee or by its own authority, may permit payment of the claim in whole or part; provided, however, that this shall apply only if such payment is not likely to harm the interest of a person who holds a claim on the estate or any other preferred bankruptcy claim with the senior or same priority.
第百一条　優先的破産債権である給料の請求権又は退職手当の請求権について届出をした破産債権者が、これらの破産債権の弁済を受けなければその生活の維持を図るのに困難を生ずるおそれがあるときは、裁判所は、最初に第百九十五条第一項に規定する最後配当、第二百四条第一項に規定する簡易配当、第二百八条第一項に規定する同意配当又は第二百九条第一項に規定する中間配当の許可があるまでの間、破産管財人の申立てにより又は職権で、その全部又は一部の弁済をすることを許可することができる。ただし、その弁済により財団債権又は他の先順位若しくは同順位の優先的破産債権を有する者の利益を害するおそれがないときに限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
There are various theories about the issuing of this Expelling edict and the cause could be that Hideyoshi was furious at the residents rejecting his order to bring a woman of Arima because she was Christian, that Coelho, Vice-Provincial of the Society of Jesus in Japan at that time boasted as if the Spanish Armada was under his command in front of Hideyoshi during the expedition to Kyusyu, that the Christian feudal lords such as ARIMA and OMURA in Kyushu destroyed shrines and temples as well as persecuted monks and made huge donations to the churches, and that the Society of Jesus did not obey when he tried to apply the policy to Nagasaki, the domain of the Society, they dissolved the old domains of temples and shrines inherited from Nobunaga ODA and place them under a unified regime, and that some of the missionaries conducted human trafficking (selling the Japanese to outside Japan as slaves).
この追放令が出た背景には諸説あり、秀吉が有馬の女性を連れてくるように命令した際にキリシタンであることを理由に住民が拒否し秀吉が激怒したとも、九州征伐に向かった秀吉の目の前で、当時の日本イエズス会準管区長でもあったコエリョがスペイン艦隊が自分の指揮下にあるごとく誇示した事が原因とも、九州の有馬氏や大村氏などのキリシタン大名が寺社仏閣を破壊すると同時に、僧侶にも迫害を加えたり教会へ莫大な寄進を行っていた事が理由とも、また織田信長から継承した旧来の寺社領を解体して統一政権の支配下におく政策をイエズス会領である長崎にも適用しようとしてイエズス会側が従わなかったとも、宣教師の一部が人身売買（日本人を奴隷商品として国外へ売り払う）を行っていた事が原因とも言われている。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
The initial plan was as follows: bifurcate a feeder line from Morishoji Station on the Keihan Main Line (corresponding to the current Senbayashi Station); at Akagawa, connect it with the line proceeding from the project site of Kami-shinjo Station to the south, and then extend the line to Umeda Station via Sakuranomiya Station and Tenma Station on the Joto Line (later Osaka Loop Line); at Umeda Station, construct a general terminal station (after the inauguration of Tenjinbashi Station; subsequently, the plan was changed to bifurcate the Keihan Main Line at Noe Station and extend the Shinkeihan Line from Tenjinbashi Station, but the plan was abandoned in 1932 and the license lapsed in 1942 (see also the section on the Keihan Umeda Line); however, since the elevation of the Joto Line was postponed due to the investment policy that prioritized the reconstruction of the Great Kanto Earthquake, Keihan, which had anticipated extending the line up to Umeda Station by making use of the site of the Joto Line once it was elevated, decided to look for an alternate site, based on the perspective that this new line project wouldn't be feasible for some time.
当初は京阪本線森小路駅（現在の千林駅に相当）から支線を分岐させて、新京阪線上新庄駅予定地から南へ延長した路線に赤川で合流させ、城東線（後の大阪環状線）桜ノ宮駅・天満駅を経由して梅田まで延伸し、同地に総合ターミナル駅を作ろうという構想（天神橋駅開業後に京阪本線は野江駅分岐、新京阪線は天神橋駅からの延伸に計画変更し、1932年に断念、1942年に免許失効。京阪梅田線も参照）を打ち出したが、城東線の高架化が関東大震災復興工事優先投資の方針から遅れることになったため、梅田延伸に関して高架化に伴う跡地の利用を考えていた京阪では、この新線は当面は実現不可能と考えて、代替地を探すことにした。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
Article 23-10 (1) When the Prime Minister finds that a Shelf Registration Statement (including Reference Documents referenced therein) or the documents attached thereto, an Amended Shelf Registration Statement submitted under Article 23-4 or paragraph (1) of the preceding Article (including Reference Documents referenced therein) or Shelf Registration Supplements (including Reference Documents referenced therein) or the documents attached thereto contains any fake statement on important matters, or lacks a statement on important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding, he/she may at any time order the person submitting these documents to submit an Amended Shelf Registration Statement. In this case, a hearing shall be held irrespective of the categories of procedures for hearing statements of opinion under Article 13(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act.
第二十三条の十　内閣総理大臣は、発行登録書（当該発行登録書に係る参照書類を含む。）及びその添付書類、第二十三条の四若しくは前条第一項の規定による訂正発行登録書（当該訂正発行登録書に係る参照書類を含む。）又は発行登録追補書類（当該発行登録追補書類に係る参照書類を含む。）及びその添付書類のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けていることを発見したときは、いつでも、当該書類の提出者に対し、訂正発行登録書の提出を命ずることができる。この場合においては、行政手続法第十三条第一項の規定による意見陳述のための手続の区分にかかわらず、聴聞を行わなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 316-20 (1) With regard to evidence other than that which has been disclosed pursuant to the provisions of Article 316-14 and paragraph (1) of Article 316-15 and which is deemed to be connected to the allegation prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 316-17, the public prosecutor shall, upon the request of disclosure by the defendant or his/her counsel, promptly disclose it by the means prescribed in item (i) of Article 316-14 when he/she deems it appropriate considering the extent of the connection, other necessities for disclosure in order to prepare for the defense of the accused, and the contents and the extent of possible harmful effects of disclosure. In this case, the public prosecutor may, when he/she deems it necessary, designate the time or method of disclosure or set appropriate conditions for the disclosure.
第三百十六条の二十　検察官は、第三百十六条の十四及び第三百十六条の十五第一項の規定による開示をした証拠以外の証拠であつて、第三百十六条の十七第一項の主張に関連すると認められるものについて、被告人又は弁護人から開示の請求があつた場合において、その関連性の程度その他の被告人の防御の準備のために当該開示をすることの必要性の程度並びに当該開示によつて生じるおそれのある弊害の内容及び程度を考慮し、相当と認めるときは、速やかに、第三百十六条の十四第一号に定める方法による開示をしなければならない。この場合において、検察官は、必要と認めるときは、開示の時期若しくは方法を指定し、又は条件を付することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(1) Notwithstanding anything in any rule of law, an invention made by an employee shall, as between him and his employer, be taken to belong to his employer for the purposes of this Act and all other purposes if -- (a) the invention was made in the course of the normal duties of the employee or in the course of duties falling outside his normal duties, but specifically assigned to him, and the circumstances in either case were such that an invention might reasonably be expected to result from the carrying out of his duties; or (b) the invention was made in the course of the duties of the employee and, at the time of making the invention, because of the nature of his duties and the particular responsibilities arising from the nature of his duties he had a special obligation to further the interests of the employer's undertaking.
(1) 如何なる法規の如何なる規定にも拘らず，従業者により行われる発明は，同人とその使用者との間では，次の場合は，本法の適用上及び他のすべての目的で，当該使用者に帰属すると解される。 (a) 当該発明が当該従業者の通常の職務の過程又は同人の通常の職務外であるが特別に同人に割り当てられた職務の過程で行われ，かつ，何れの場合の状況も同人の職務遂行の結果として発明が期待されて当然であった場合，又は (b) 当該発明が当該従業者の職務の過程で行われ，かつ，当該発明が行われた時点で，当該従業者の職務の性質上及び同人の職務の性質から生じる特定の責任により，同人に当該使用者の事業の利益を促進する特別の義務があった場合 - 特許庁
(1) The Office shall revoke a patent if during the proceedings started on third party request or ex officio it is proved that (a) requirements for granting it pursuant to Sections 5 to 9 have not been met, (b) the invention is not disclosed and described in the patent so clearly and so fully so that it can be carried out by a person skilled in the art, (c) the subject-matter of the patent extends the content of the application as filed. This shall also apply in case of the subject-matter of the patent granted on the basis of a divisional application extending over the contents of the application as filed, (d) the scope of protection following from the patent was extended, (e) the owner does not have the right to the patent pursuant to Section 10(1) and (3), Section 11(1) or Section 12(1). (f) the granting conditions valid in time of granting were not fulfilled.
(1) 第三者の請求又は職権による手続において次の事由の何れかが証明された場合は，庁は，特許を取り消す。(a) 第5条から第9条までの特許付与の要件が満たされていないこと (b) 発明が，特許において，当該技術の熟練者によって実施可能な程度に明確かつ完全に開示及び説明されていないこと (c) 特許の対象が出願の内容を超えていること。これは，分割出願に基づいて付与された特許の対象が分割出願の内容を超える場合にも適用される。 (d) 特許による保護範囲が拡大されていること (e) 所有者が，第10条(1)及び(3)，第11条(1)又は第12条(1)に基づいて特許を受ける権原を有する者とは認められないこと (f) 特許付与の時点において有効であった規則にいう特許付与の要件が満たされていなかったこと - 特許庁
(7) The provisions of Articles 40, 41 and Article 42, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the detention pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph. In this case, "the written detention order set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 40 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the written detention order set forth in Article 13, paragraph (6)"; "the suspect" with "the alien granted permission for provisional landing"; and "the summary of the suspected offense" with "grounds for detention", respectively. In Article 41, paragraph (1), "shall be within 30 days. However, if a supervising immigration inspector finds that there are unavoidable reasons, he/she may extend such period for only a further 30 days" shall be deemed to be replaced with "for a period of time preceding the completion of procedures for landing provided for in Chapter III which the supervising immigration inspector finds to be necessary"; and in paragraph (3) of the same Article and Article 42, paragraph (1), "a suspect" shall be deemed to be replaced with "an alien granted permission for provisional landing".
７　第四十条から第四十二条第一項までの規定は、前項の規定による収容に準用する。この場合において、第四十条中「前条第一項の収容令書」とあるのは「第十三条第六項の収容令書」と、「容疑者」とあるのは「仮上陸の許可を受けた外国人」と、「容疑事実の要旨」とあるのは「収容すべき事由」と、第四十一条第一項中「三十日以内とする。但し、主任審査官は、やむを得ない事由があると認めるときは、三十日を限り延長することができる。」とあるのは「第三章に規定する上陸の手続が完了するまでの間において、主任審査官が必要と認める期間とする。」と、同条第三項及び第四十二条第一項中「容疑者」とあるのは「仮上陸の許可を受けた外国人」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 7 (1) Any person who has, at the time of enforcement of Article 1, obtained an approval of the type set forth in Article 23, paragraph (1) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act with respect to the special specified products under transition (including any person who has obtained an approval for the application for approval of the type, for which the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions (except for an application for approval of the type as prescribed in Article 32-4, paragraph (1) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act)) shall be deemed to have performed the obligation in accordance with the provisions of Article 12, paragraph (1) of the New Consumer Products Safety Act until the expiration of the period specified by Cabinet Order set forth in Article 25, paragraph (1) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act commencing from the date of said approval in the case where said person manufactured the special specified products under transition of the type pertaining to this approval.
第七条　第一条の規定の施行の際現に移行特別特定製品について旧消費生活用製品安全法第二十三条第一項の型式の承認を受けている者（附則第四条第一項若しくは第三項の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされた型式の承認の申請（旧消費生活用製品安全法第三十二条の四第一項の型式の承認の申請を除く。）について承認を受けた者を含む。）は、その承認に係る型式の移行特別特定製品を製造した場合には、当該承認を受けた日から旧消費生活用製品安全法第二十五条第一項の政令で定める期間を経過する日までの間は、新消費生活用製品安全法第十二条第一項の規定による義務を履行したものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 40-3 (1) Where a New Multilevel Marketing Distributor has been misled as specified in Item 1 or 2 as a result of a Supervisor or a solicitor conducting acts listed in said items in soliciting a Multilevel Marketing Contract pertaining to a series of Multilevel Marketing activities supervised by the Supervisor, or has been misled as specified in Item 3 as a result of a general multilevel marketing distributor conducting the act listed in said item in soliciting a Multilevel Marketing Contract pertaining to the Multilevel Marketing, and thereby makes an application for said Multilevel Marketing Contract or manifests his/her intention to enter into such contract, he/she may rescind the application or the manifestation of intention; however, this shall not apply when the counterparty of said Multilevel Marketing Contract was unaware of such act by said Supervisor, said solicitor, or said general multilevel marketing distributor at the time of concluding said Multilevel Marketing Contract:
第四十条の三　連鎖販売加入者は、統括者若しくは勧誘者がその統括者の統括する一連の連鎖販売業に係る連鎖販売契約の締結について勧誘をするに際し第一号若しくは第二号に掲げる行為をしたことにより当該各号に定める誤認をし、又は一般連鎖販売業者がその連鎖販売業に係る連鎖販売契約の締結について勧誘をするに際し第三号に掲げる行為をしたことにより同号に定める誤認をし、これらによつて当該連鎖販売契約の申込み又はその承諾の意思表示をしたときは、これを取り消すことができる。ただし、当該連鎖販売契約の相手方が、当該連鎖販売契約の締結の当時、当該統括者、当該勧誘者又は当該一般連鎖販売業者がこれらの行為をした事実を知らなかつたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 3 From among persons who, at the time of establishment of the Institute, are actually employees of an agency or a department specified by Cabinet Order, as prescribed in the preceding Article, when there is any person who has proceeded to become an employee of the Institute on the day of establishment of the Institute (hereinafter referred to as a "successional employee" in the following Article) and who has obtained recognition pursuant to the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (1) of the Child Allowance Act (Act No. 73 of 1971) (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 6, paragraph (2), Article 7, paragraph (4), or Article 8, paragraph (4) of the supplementary provisions of said Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) from the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, or when there is any person who has been delegated by the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry on the day preceding the date of establishment of the Institute and who falls under the payment requirements for child allowance or the benefits specified in Article 6, paragraph (1), Article 7, paragraph (1) or Article 8, paragraph (1) of the supplementary provisions of said Act (hereinafter referred to as "special benefits, etc." in this Article) on the day of establishment of the Institute, payment of child allowance or special benefits, etc. to said person shall be deemed as having been recognized by the mayor (including ward mayors of special wards) pursuant to the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (1) of said Act on the day of establishment of the Institute. In this case, payment of such child allowance or special benefits, etc. that were deemed to have been recognized shall begin the month after the month in which the day preceding the day of establishment of the Institute falls, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 8, paragraph (2) of said Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 6, paragraph (2), Article 7, paragraph (4), or Article 8, paragraph (4) of the supplementary provisions of said Act).
第三条　研究所の成立の際現に前条に規定する政令で定める部局又は機関の職員である者のうち、研究所の成立の日において引き続き研究所の職員となったもの（次条において「引継職員」という。）であって、研究所の成立の日の前日において経済産業大臣又はその委任を受けた者から児童手当法（昭和四十六年法律第七十三号）第七条第一項（同法附則第六条第二項、第七条第四項又は第八条第四項において準用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の規定による認定を受けているものが、研究所の成立の日において児童手当又は同法附則第六条第一項、第七条第一項若しくは第八条第一項の給付（以下この条において「特例給付等」という。）の支給要件に該当するときは、その者に対する児童手当又は特例給付等の支給に関しては、研究所の成立の日において同法第七条第一項の規定による市町村長（特別区の区長を含む。）の認定があったものとみなす。この場合において、その認定があったものとみなされた児童手当又は特例給付等の支給は、同法第八条第二項（同法附則第六条第二項、第七条第四項又は第八条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定にかかわらず、研究所の成立の日の前日の属する月の翌月から始める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 4 (1) When capital transactions pertaining to a notification given pursuant to the provision of Article 22, paragraph 1 of the Old Act prior to the date of enforcement of this Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Date of Enforcement"), which has not actually been conducted at the time of enforcement of this Act (limited to capital transactions to which the provision of Article 23, paragraph 1 of the Old Act is applicable; hereinafter referred to as the "Capital Transactions Subject to Examination in Advance under the Old Act" in this and the next article), fall under outward direct investment that shall be notified pursuant to the provisions of an order pursuant to Article 23, paragraph 1 of the New Act (referred to as the "Outward Direct Investment Subject to Examination in Advance under the New Act" in the next paragraph) and also fall under those for which the period in which capital transactions shall not be conducted pursuant to the provision of Article 23, paragraph 1 of the Old Act has expired prior to the Date of Enforcement, those on which a notice of acceptance of a recommendation prescribed in Article 23, paragraph 5 of the Old Act (limited to those pertaining to a content change prescribed in paragraph 2 of the said article) has been given, or those for which a content change has been ordered pursuant to the provision of paragraph 7 of the said article (referred to as the "Capital Transactions for Which Notification Procedure Has Been Completed" in the next paragraph and the next article), the Capital Transactions Subject to Examination in Advance under the Old Act shall be deemed to be those for which the period in which outward direct investment shall not be made pursuant to the provision of Article 23, paragraph 3 of the New Act has expired, those on which a notice of acceptance of a recommendation prescribed in paragraph 7 of the said article (limited to those pertaining to a content change prescribed in paragraph 4 of the said article) has been given, or those for which a content change has been ordered pursuant to the provision of paragraph 9 of the said article, respectively.
第四条　この法律の施行の日（以下「施行日」という。）前に旧法第二十二条第一項の規定によりされた届出に係る資本取引でこの法律の施行の際現に行われていないもの（旧法第二十三条第一項の規定の適用のある資本取引に限る。以下この条及び次条において「旧法事前審査対象資本取引」という。）が、新法第二十三条第一項の規定に基づく命令の規定により届け出なければならないとされる対外直接投資（次項において「新法事前審査対象対外直接投資」という。）に該当するものであって、施行日前に、旧法第二十三条第一項の規定により資本取引を行ってはならないとされる期間が満了したもの、旧法第二十三条第五項に規定する勧告（同条第二項に規定する内容の変更に係るものに限る。）を応諾する旨の通知がされたもの又は同条第七項の規定により内容の変更を命じられたもの（次項及び次条において「届出手続完了資本取引」という。）に該当するものであるときは、当該旧法事前審査対象資本取引は、それぞれ新法第二十三条第三項の規定により対外直接投資を行ってはならないとされる期間が満了したもの、同条第七項に規定する勧告（同条第四項に規定する内容の変更に係るものに限る。）を応諾する旨の通知がされたもの又は同条第九項の規定により内容の変更を命じられたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 68-88-2 (1) Where a consolidated parent corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency, the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the consolidated corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the consolidated corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax.
第六十八条の八十八の二　連結親法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、当該申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（当該申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、当該申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(12) Where a person (excluding the corporations listed in Appended Table 1 of the Corporation Tax Act, specified book-entry transfer institution, etc., foreign intermediary and any other person specified by a Cabinet Order) makes, for the first time since April 1, 1999, entries or records under the book-entry transfer system with regard to specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. (meaning specified short-term government or company bonds, principal-only book-entry transfer national government bonds prescribed in Article 90(2) of the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Company Bonds, etc., and coupon-only book-entry transfer national government bonds prescribed in paragraph (3) of the said Article for which separate trading of principal and interest prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article has been conducted pursuant to the provision of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) in the person's account that will be or has been established with a specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. (meaning a [1] book-entry transfer institution prescribed in Article 2(2) of the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Company Bonds, etc., [2] an institution that shall be deemed to be the said book-entry transfer institution pursuant to the provision of Article 48 of the said Act, and [3] a specified account management institution (meaning a specified account management institution prescribed in Article 5-2(5)(ii)) and specified indirect account management institution (meaning a specified indirect account management institution prescribed in Article 5-2(5)(iii)), with each of which the said book-entry transfer institution (including an institution that shall be deemed as such) has established an account in accordance with the operational rules prescribed in Article 3(1)(v) of the said Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or established with a foreign intermediary (meaning a foreign indirect account management institution prescribed in Article 5-2(5)(viii) (hereinafter referred to in this Article as a "foreign indirect account management institution") and a foreign further indirect account management institution prescribed in Article 5-2(5)(vii) (hereinafter referred to in this Article as a "foreign further indirect account management institution"); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), via a business office, etc. (meaning a business office, etc. prescribed in Article 5-2(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) of the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. or an overseas business office, etc. (meaning a business office or any other office of a foreign intermediary which is located outside Japan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) of the said foreign intermediary, such person shall, upon making the first entries or records under the book-entry transfer system (limited to those made in the said account; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), submit a written notice stating the person's name and address (or any other place specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance in the case where the person does not have an address in Japan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance, to the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. through which the person makes the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system, or submit such a written notice via the foreign intermediary through which the person makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system (in the case where the said foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said foreign intermediary (in the case where the said foreign intermediary makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. through another foreign further indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said foreign intermediary and such other foreign further indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.) and the foreign indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.), to the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. through which the said foreign intermediary (in the case where the said foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution: the foreign indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.) makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. In this case, such person who submits the said written notice shall present a copy of the person's certificate of residence, certificate of registered matters of the corporation and any other document specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph to paragraph (18) as "identification documents") to the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. to which the said written notice is submitted (excluding the case where the said written notice is submitted via the said foreign intermediary; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or to the head of the overseas business office, etc. of the said foreign intermediary to which the said written notice is submitted, and the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry-transfer institution, etc. to which the said written notice is submitted or the head of the overseas business office, etc. of the said foreign intermediary to which the said written notice is submitted shall confirm, by the said identification documents, the name and address stated in the said written notice.
１２　平成十一年四月一日以後最初に特定振替機関等（社債等の振替に関する法律第二条第二項に規定する振替機関及び同法第四十八条の規定により当該振替機関とみなされる者並びに当該振替機関（当該みなされる者を含む。）の同法第三条第一項第五号に規定する業務規程の定めるところにより口座の開設を受けた特定口座管理機関（第五条の二第五項第二号に規定する特定口座管理機関をいう。）及び特定間接口座管理機関（第五条の二第五項第三号に規定する特定間接口座管理機関をいう。）をいう。以下この条において同じ。）又は外国仲介業者（第五条の二第五項第八号に規定する外国間接口座管理機関（以下この条において「外国間接口座管理機関」という。）及び同項第七号に規定する外国再間接口座管理機関（以下この条において「外国再間接口座管理機関」という。）をいう。以下この条において同じ。）に開設され、又は開設されている口座において当該特定振替機関等の営業所等（第五条の二第一項に規定する営業所等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）又は当該外国仲介業者の国外営業所等（外国仲介業者の国外にある営業所又は事務所をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）を通じて特定振替国債等（特定短期公社債並びに社債等の振替に関する法律第九十条第二項に規定する分離元本振替国債及び財務省令で定めるところにより同条第一項に規定する元利分離が行われた同条第三項に規定する分離利息振替国債をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の振替記載等を受ける者（法人税法別表第一に掲げる法人、特定振替機関等、外国仲介業者その他の政令で定めるものを除く。）は、その者の氏名又は名称及び住所（国内に住所を有しない者にあつては、財務省令で定める場所。以下この条において同じ。）その他の財務省令で定める事項を記載した告知書を、その最初に振替記載等（当該口座においてされるものに限る。以下この条において同じ。）を受ける際、その振替記載等を受ける特定振替機関等の営業所等の長に対し、又はその振替記載等を受ける外国仲介業者（当該外国仲介業者が外国再間接口座管理機関である場合には、当該外国仲介業者（当該外国仲介業者が他の外国再間接口座管理機関において当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受ける場合には、当該外国仲介業者及び当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る他の外国再間接口座管理機関）及び当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る外国間接口座管理機関）を経由して当該外国仲介業者（当該外国仲介業者が外国再間接口座管理機関である場合には、当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る外国間接口座管理機関）が当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受ける特定振替機関等の営業所等の長に対し提出しなければならない。この場合において、当該告知書の提出をする者は、当該告知書の提出（当該外国仲介業者を経由して提出する場合を除く。以下この項において同じ。）をする特定振替機関等の営業所等の長又は当該外国仲介業者の国外営業所等の長にその者の住民票の写し、法人の登記事項証明書その他の政令で定める書類（以下この項から第十八項までにおいて「確認書類」という。）を提示しなければならないものとし、当該告知書の提出を受ける特定振替機関等の営業所等の長又は当該外国仲介業者の国外営業所等の長は、当該告知書に記載されている氏名又は名称及び住所を当該確認書類により確認しなければならないものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 250 (1) In addition to the minor modifications prescribed in Article 135, paragraph (4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 210, paragraph (1) and Article 272-29) made to the contract set forth in Article 135, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 210, paragraph (1) and Article 272-29), an Insurance Company, etc., or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., may, in the cases that fall under the following listed cases, prescribe a reduction in the amount of insurance claims and any other modifications to contract clauses with regard to insurance contracts (excluding specified contracts) that will be transferred pursuant to that contract (excluding said minor modifications, that reduce the policy reserves that should be reserved from Insurance Premiums received after the time of the public notice, etc., prescribed in paragraph (3), item (i) with regard to Covered Insurance Contracts other than specified Covered Insurance Contracts (referred to as Covered Insurance Contracts prescribed in Article 270, paragraph (3), item (i)), and modifications that will establish disadvantageous content relating to cancellation refunds or any other similar benefits specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance or Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance that accrue after the time of the public notice, etc., prescribed in that item with regard to specified Covered Insurance Contracts compared to other insurance claims or any other benefits pertaining to said specified Covered Insurance Contracts; hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as "Modifications to Contract Conditions"):
第二百五十条　保険会社等又は外国保険会社等は、次に掲げる場合に該当する場合には、第百三十五条第一項（第二百十条第一項及び第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する場合を含む。）の契約において、第百三十五条第四項（第二百十条第一項及び第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する軽微な変更のほか、当該契約により移転するものとされる保険契約（特定契約を除く。）について保険金額の削減その他の契約条項の変更（当該軽微な変更、特定補償対象契約以外の補償対象契約（第二百七十条の三第二項第一号に規定する補償対象契約をいう。）について第三項第一号に規定する公告等の時以後に収受した保険料により積み立てるべき責任準備金を減額する変更及び特定補償対象契約について同号に規定する公告等の時以後に発生する解約返戻金その他これに類するものとして内閣府令・財務省令で定める給付金に関しこれら以外の当該特定補償対象契約に係る保険金その他の給付金に比して不利な内容を定める変更を除く。以下この款において「契約条件の変更」という。）を定めることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(5) [If an Excuse/Exclusion clause is not included]If, as of the date of distribution under the liquidation procedures of the Partnership pursuant to Article 47, the General Partner has received an incentive fee and (i) the cumulative amount of the Partnership Assets that has been distributed to the Interested Partners pursuant to Article 29 or Article 47 (in the case of in kind distributions, including the Value at the Time of Distribution thereof; in this Article, the same applies) (the “Cumulative Distributed Amount”) is less than the sum of (a) the total Capital Contributions made by the Interested Partners and (b) an amount equal to [O]% thereof (such sum is hereinafter referred to as the “Preferred Distribution Amount”) or (ii) the total incentive fees received by the General Partner (the “Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount”) exceeds [Q]% of the sum of (A) the Cumulative Distributed Amount after thededuction of the total Capital Contributions made by the Interested Partners and (B) the Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount, the General Partner shall promptly return to the Partnership the amount equal to the lesser of (x) the larger of the amounts set forth in the items below or (y) the Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount. Upon payment to the Partnership, such refund (the “Clawback Amount”) shall be allocated to each Interested Partner in proportion to its Interest Amount (for a Withdrawing Partner, the Interest Amount at the time of withdrawal).
5. 【免除/除外条項を設けない場合】第47 条に基づく本組合の清算手続における分配を行う日の時点において、無限責任組合員が成功報酬を受領している場合で、かつ、(ⅰ)第29 条又は第47条に基づき組合員等に対して行われた組合財産の分配額（現物分配の場合にはその分配時評価額を含む。以下本条において同じ。）の累計額（以下「対象分配累計額」という。）が、組合員等によりなされた出資履行金額の総額及び同金額の［α］%に相当する金額の合計額（以下「優先分配金額」という。）を下回るか、又は(ⅱ)無限責任組合員が受領した成功報酬の合計額（以下「対象成功報酬累計額」という。）が、対象分配累計額から組合員等の出資履行金額の合計額を控除した金額及び対象成功報酬累計額の合計額の［β］%を超える場合、無限責任組合員は、(x)以下の各号に定める金額のうちいずれか大きい金額又は(y)対象成功報酬累計額の金額のうち、いずれか小さい金額に相当する額を、本組合に速やかに返還するものとする。かかる返還金（以下「クローバック金額」という。）は、本組合への支払いをもって、各組合員等へその持分金額（脱退組合員については脱退当時の持分金額）に応じ按分の上帰属する。 - 経済産業省
(2) In the case where a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. has been subject to two or more foreign corporation taxes or to a foreign corporation tax twice or more on its income for a taxable business year, when a domestic corporation related to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. seeks the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) (including the cases where it is applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article by deeming the amount to be as specified therein; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or Article 68-91(1) (including the cases where it is applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article by deeming the amount to be as specified therein; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) of the Act, regarding the amount of the said foreign corporation taxes in two or more business years or consolidated business years; with respect to the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act for a business year following the first one of the said two or more business years or consolidated business years, the amount obtained by deducting the amount listed in item (ii) (the amount listed in item (iii), when seeking the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act for the first time after receiving the application of the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act) from the amount listed in item (i) shall be deemed to be the calculated amount prescribed in the preceding paragraph:
２　特定外国子会社等につきその課税対象年度の所得に対して二以上の外国法人税が課され、又は二回以上にわたつて外国法人税が課された場合において、当該特定外国子会社等に係る内国法人がその二以上の事業年度又は連結事業年度において当該外国法人税の額につき法第六十六条の七第一項（同条第二項の規定によりみなして適用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）又は第六十八条の九十一第一項（同条第二項の規定によりみなして適用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の規定の適用を受けるときは、当該二以上の事業年度又は連結事業年度のうち最初の事業年度又は連結事業年度後の事業年度に係る法第六十六条の七第一項の規定の適用については、第一号に掲げる金額から第二号に掲げる金額（法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定の適用を受けた場合で、その適用を受けた後最初に法第六十六条の七第一項の規定の適用を受けるときは、第三号に掲げる金額）を控除した金額をもつて前項に規定する計算した金額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
As you know, Tokyo Electric Power issues a very large amount of corporate bonds. In the European market, the company has issued corporate bonds totaling around 180 billion yen and it also borrows a large amount of loans from private financial institutions. The written agreement adopted on May 13 refers to three important points. We must, first, take measures to ensure appropriate damage compensation, second, prevent adverse effects on business operators involved in the stabilization of the situation of Tokyo Electric Power's Fukushima Nuclear Power Station and the handling of the accident and, third, ensure the stable supply of electricity, which is essential to the people's lives. The agreement also refers to the need to check, after a certain period of time, whether adequate support is provided to disaster victims, whether the stable supply of electricity is maintained, and whether the stability of the financial market is maintained, as I strongly insisted on the inclusion of this in the agreement.
ご存じのように、東京電力は大変大きな社債を発行していますし、それから、これは確か1,800億円ぐらい、ヨーロッパの市場でも東京電力は社債を発行していますし、それから民間の金融機関から多額のお金をお借りしておられるようですから、やはりそういった意味で、この5月13日の合意文書の中にもきちんと三つ入っておりまして、第1に、適切な損害賠償のための万全の措置、第2に、東京電力福島原子力発電所の状態の安定化及び事故処理に関係する事業者等への悪影響の回避、もう一つが、国民生活に不可欠な電力の安定供給ということと併せて、一定期間後に被災者、被害者救済に遺漏がないか、電力の安定供給が図られているか、金融市場の安定が図られているか、こういうことを文書にもきちんと、私は強く主張して入れていただいた経緯もございます。 - 金融庁
Where the application concerns a microbiological process or the product thereof and involves the use of a microorganism which cannot be sufficiently disclosed in the application in such a way as to enable the invention to be carried out by a person skilled in the art, and such material is not available to the public, the invention shall only be regarded as being disclosed if: (a) A culture of the microorganism has been deposited in a depositary institution before filing the application; (b) The depositary institution and the file number of the culture deposit are stated in the application. If this information is not yet available at the time of filing the application, the said information shall be submitted within two months from request of the Examiner. Publication of the application under Section 44, IP CODE shall be held pending submission of said information; and (c) The application as filed gives relevant information as is available to the applicant on the characteristics of the microorganism.
出願が微生物学的方法又はこれにより得られる物に関連し，かつ，微生物の使用を必要とする場合において，その発明を当該技術の熟練者が実施することができるような方法では，その微生物を出願に十分に開示することができず，また，その微生物を公衆の利用に供することができないときは，発明は，次の状況においてのみ開示されたものとみなす。 (a)微生物の培養体が出願前に寄託機関に寄託されていること (b)寄託機関及び培養体寄託番号が出願書類に記載されていること。この情報が出願の時点で未だ入手可能でない場合は，当該情報は，審査官の請求から2月以内に提出しなければならない。IP法第44条に基づく出願の公開は，当該情報の提出を待って行われる。及び (c)なされた出願が，微生物の特性に関して，出願人による入手が可能な関連情報を与えること - 特許庁
As a rule, only one view of each invention can be shown in the IPO Gazette illustrations. The selection of that portion of a drawing best calculated to explain the nature of the invention or its specific improvement would be facilitated and the final result improved by judicious execution of a figure with express reference to the IPO Gazette, but which must at the same time serve as one of the figures referred to in the specification. For this purpose the figure may be a plan, elevation, section, or perspective view, according to the judgment of the draftsman. All its parts should be especially open and distinct, with very little or no shading, and it must illustrate only the invention claimed, to the exclusion of all other details. When well executed, it will be used without curtailment or change, but any excessive fineness or crowding or unnecessary elaborateness of detail will necessitate its exclusion from the IPO Gazette.
原則として，各発明について1の図のみをIPO公報に表示することができる。発明の内容又はその具体的な改良点を説明するのに最も適した図面の部分を選択することが望ましく，IPO公報に明確に言及した図を思慮深く作成することにより最終的結果も良いものになる。ただし，これは，同時に，明細書において言及される図の1としても機能するものでなければならない。この目的のため，図は，製図者の判断により，平面図，正面図，断面図又は斜視図にする。図の各部は，特に縁取りをせず，かつ，区別することができるものにし，陰影はなるべく又は全く使用せず，主張する発明のみを例示するものであって，他の一切の要素を除外するものとする。適切に作成された場合は，省略又は変更なく用いるが，過度の微細さ，詰まり過ぎ又は細部の不要な精緻さを伴う場合は，IPO公報から除かれる。 - 特許庁
(2) The filing date of a patent application shall be the date on which the documents referred to in Section 34(3), nos. 1 and 2, have been received and, if they contain any statements that would appear to constitute a description, the date on which documents referred to in Section 34(3), no. 4, have been received 1. at the Patent Office; or 2. at a Patent Information Center if said Center has been designated for said purpose in an announcement by the Federal Ministry of Justice in the Federal Law Gazette [Bundesgesetzblatt]. Should the documents not be drafted in German, this shall apply only if a German translation is received by the Patent Office within the time limit referred to in the first sentence of subsection (1); if no such translation is filed, the application shall be deemed not to have been filed. If the applicant files the omitted drawings after having been invited to do so in accordance with the second sentence of subsection (1), the date of receipt of the drawings at the Patent Office shall constitute the filing date; if such is not done, any reference to the drawings shall be deemed not to have been made.
(2) 特許出願日は，第 34条(3)1.及び 2.にいう書類が受領され，かつ，それらが外見上，発明の説明を構成すると思われる陳述を含んでいる場合は，第 34条(3)4.にいう書類が，2.特許情報センターが連邦法律官報における連邦法務省の公示によって当該目的で指定されているときは，その情報センターにおいて，受領された日とする。書類がドイツ語で作成されていない場合は，この規定は，ドイツ語翻訳文が(1)第 1文にいう期限内に特許庁によって受領された場合にのみ適用される。当該翻訳文が提出されないときは，その出願はされなかったとみなされる。出願人が(1)第 2文に従って，提出するよう求められた後に遺漏した図面を提出したときは，特許庁におけるその図面の受領日が出願日を構成する。提出がされなかったときは，その図面への言及はされていないものとみなされる。 - 特許庁
Article 52-14 (1) The Prime Minister may, when and to the extent that he/she finds it particularly necessary for ensuring sound and appropriate management of the business of a Bank in light of the status of business or property (in the case that the Major Shareholder of Bank is a company or any other juridical person, it shall include the status of property of Subsidiary Companies of that Major Shareholder of the Bank or any other companies that have a special relationship specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance with that Major Shareholder of Bank) of the Major Shareholder of Bank (limited to a person who holds more than five hundredths of the Voting Rights Held by All of the Shareholders of the Bank; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), request the Major Shareholder of Bank to submit an improvement plan for securing the soundness in management of the Bank or order amendment of the submitted improvement plan by designating matters for which measures should be taken and the time limit therefor, or may order, within the limit necessary, measures necessary for the purpose of supervision.
第五十二条の十四　内閣総理大臣は、銀行主要株主（銀行の総株主の議決権の百分の五十を超える議決権の保有者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）の業務又は財産の状況（銀行主要株主が会社その他の法人である場合にあつては、当該銀行主要株主の子会社その他の当該銀行主要株主と内閣府令で定める特殊の関係のある会社の財産の状況を含む。）に照らして、当該銀行の業務の健全かつ適切な運営を確保するため特に必要があると認めるときは、その必要の限度において、当該銀行主要株主に対し、措置を講ずべき事項及び期限を示して、当該銀行の経営の健全性を確保するための改善計画の提出を求め、若しくは提出された改善計画の変更を命じ、又はその必要の限度において監督上必要な措置を命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(8) The accounting of the government concerning the collection of the Paragraph 1 general contributions pursuant to the provisions of the Act on Asbestos Health Damage Relief (Act No.4 of 2006) shall be performed in the labor insurance special account, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 1 for the time being. In such case, the term "and subsidiary miscellaneous income" in Article 6 shall be changed to read ", the money received from the general account based on the provisions of Article 34 of the Act on Asbestos Health Damage Relief (Act No.4 of 2006), the general contributions set forth in Paragraph 1, Article 35 of the same Act (hereinafter referred to as "general contributions" in this article), and subsidiary miscellaneous income;" and the term ", the collection of labor insurance premiums and," to read ", the returned money of general contributions, the grant to the Incorporated Administrative Agency, Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan, labor insurance premiums and the collection of general contributions, and."
８　石綿による健康被害の救済に関する法律（平成十八年法律第四号）の規定による第一項一般拠出金の徴収に関する政府の経理は、当分の間、第一条の規定にかかわらず、この会計において行うものとする。この場合において、第六条中「並びに附属雑収入」とあるのは「、石綿による健康被害の救済に関する法律（平成十八年法律第四号）第三十四条の規定に基づく一般会計からの受入金、同法第三十五条第一項の一般拠出金（以下この条において「一般拠出金」という。）並びに附属雑収入」と、「、労働保険料の徴収及び」とあるのは「、一般拠出金の返還金、同法第三十六条の規定による独立行政法人環境再生保全機構への交付金、労働保険料及び一般拠出金の徴収並びに」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 15 A person who is eligible, at the time of the enforcement of the provision of Article 3, to receive a Type 1 disability compensation or Type 1 disability benefits or receive injury and disability benefits under the provisions of the Former Act shall be paid a disability compensation pension or long-term injury and disease compensation benefits under the provisions of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act after the revision by the provision of said Article (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act"), respectively. In this case, with regard to long-term injury and disease compensation benefits to be paid to a person eligible to receive Type 1 injury and disease benefits, if such person reports to the government within 30 days after the enforcement of the provision of said Article, he/she shall be paid a pension only at the amount set under the provisions then in force, notwithstanding the provision of Article 18, paragraph (1) of the New Act, for the period until he/she recovers from the injury or disease or needs to receive medical treatment for the injury or disease while staying in a hospital or clinic.
第十五条　第三条の規定の施行の際現に旧法の規定による第一種障害補償費若しくは第一種障害給付又は傷病給付を受けることができる者には、それぞれ、同条の規定による改正後の労働者災害補償保険法（以下「新法」という。）の規定による障害補償年金を支給し、又は長期傷病補償給付を行なう。この場合において、第一種傷病給付を受けることができる者に対して行なう長期傷病補償給付は、その者が同条の規定の施行後三十日以内に政府に申出をしたときは、新法第十八条第一項の規定にかかわらず、当該負傷若しくは疾病がなおるまで又は当該負傷若しくは疾病について病院若しくは診療所への収容による療養を必要とするに至るまでの間、従前の例による額の年金のみとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(ii) A person who has violated this Act or the provisions of Articles 197 to 198 inclusive of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948) or who has committed a crime set forth in Article 233(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)) of the Act on Securities Investment Trust and Securities Investment Corporations (Act No. 198 of 1951), a crime set forth in Article 328(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)) of the Insurance Business Act (Act No. 105 of 1995), a crime set forth in Article 308(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)) of the Act on Securitization of Assets (Act No. 105 of 1998) or a crime set forth in Article 967(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)) of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005), who has been sentenced to imprisonment without work or a severer punishment and for whom five years have yet to elapse from the time when execution of the sentence was completed or the sentence ceased to be executed
二　この法律若しくは金融商品取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）第百九十七条から第百九十八条までの規定に違反し、又は投資信託及び投資法人に関する法律（昭和二十六年法律第百九十八号）第二百三十三条第一項（第三号に係る部分に限る。）の罪、保険業法（平成七年法律第百五号）第三百二十八条第一項（第三号に係る部分に限る。）の罪、資産の流動化に関する法律（平成十年法律第百五号）第三百八条第一項（第三号に係る部分に限る。）の罪若しくは会社法（平成十七年法律第八十六号）第九百六十七条第一項（第三号に係る部分に限る。）の罪を犯し、禁錮以上の刑に処せられた者であつて、その執行を終わり、又は執行を受けることがなくなつてから五年を経過しないもの - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Any person who imports, sells or exposes or has in his possession for sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacture any goods or thing to which a counterfeit trade mark has been applied or to which a registered trade mark has been falsely applied, unless he proves that ? having taken all reasonable precautions against committing an offence under this section, he had, at the relevant time, no reason to suspect the genuineness of the mark and on demand made by or on behalf of the prosecution, he gave all the information in his power with respect to the persons from whom he obtained the goods or thing; or he had acted innocently, is guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years, a fine not exceeding $10,000 for each goods or thing to which the counterfeit trade mark has been applied or the registered trade mark has been falsely applied (but not to exceed in the aggregate $100,000), or both.
偽造商標が使用されている又は登録商標が偽って使用されている商品又は物を販売のため又は取引もしくは製造のいずれかの目的のために輸入，販売又は展示するもしくは所有する者は何人も，本条でいう犯罪行為に対しすべての適切な事前の注意を払った上で，当該の時に，当該標章の真性を疑う理由を一切有しておらず，当該起訴により又は当該起訴の代わりになされた要求を受け，自己に当該商品又は物を与えた者に関するすべての情報を自己の権限において提供したこと，又は，善意で行動したこと，以上のことを証明する場合を除き，犯罪をなし，有罪判決により5年以下の禁固もしくは偽造商標が使用されている又は登録商標が偽って使用されている商品又は物それぞれにつき，10，000米ドル以下の罰金(合計100，000米ドル以下)，又はその両方を科せられる。 - 特許庁
(3) A condition or term of a contract or licence shall not be void by virtue of this section if -- (a) at the time of the making of the contract or granting of the licence, the supplier or licensor was willing to supply the product, or grant a licence to work the invention, as the case may be, to the person supplied or the licensee, on reasonable terms specified in the contract or licence and without any such condition or term as is mentioned in subsection (1); and (b) the person supplied or the licensee is entitled under the contract or licence to relieve himself of his liability to observe the condition or term on giving to the other party 3 months' notice in writing, and subject to payment to that other party of such compensation (being, in the case of a contract to supply, a lump sum or rent for the residue of the term of the contract and, in the case of a licence, a royalty for the residue of the term of the licence) as may be determined by an arbitrator appointed by the Minister.
(3) 契約又はライセンスの条件は，次の場合は，本条により無効とされない。 (a) 契約の成立又はライセンスの許諾の時点で，当該供給者又は実施許諾者が契約又はライセンスに指定する適切な条件により，かつ，(1)にいうような条件なしに，当該製品の供給又は場合により当該発明実施のライセンス許諾を，供給を受ける者又は実施権者に行う意思があった場合，及び (b) 供給を受ける者又は実施権者が当該契約又はライセンスに基づいて，相手方に書面をもって3月の予告通知を行い，かつ，大臣により任命された仲裁人により決定される補償金の当該相手方への支払(供給契約の場合は，当該契約の残余期間分及びライセンスの場合は，当該ライセンスの残余期間分のロイヤルティの一括払又は定期分割払)を行った上で，当該条件を遵守する義務を免れる場合 - 特許庁
(5) When approval under paragraph (3) or the preceding paragraph was granted, businesses operated by and assets and liabilities held by the Association of Compensation Funds shall be succeeded by said Consignor Protection Membership Corporation (referred to as the "Consumer Protection Fund" in paragraph (8) and paragraph (9)) as a Consumer Protection Fund (which means the Consumer Protection Fund prescribed in Article 296 of the New Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) as on the day on which the Consignor Protection Membership Corporation received said approval (when the day is prior to the day on which the Consignor Protection Membership Corporation pertaining to said approval received registration under Article 293 of the New Act [the Effective Date in the case where the Consignor Protection Membership Corporation received registration in accordance with the provisions of Article 293 of the New Act prior to the Effective Date pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3) of the preceding Article], the same day), and the Association of Compensation Funds shall be dissolved at that time. In this case, the provisions pertaining to the dissolution and liquidation of juridical persons in other laws and regulations shall not apply.
５　第三項又は前項の認可があったときは、補償基金協会の行う業務並びにその有する資産及び負債は、当該認可を受けた日（その日が当該認可に係る委託者保護会員制法人が新法第二百九十三条の登録を受けた日（前条第三項の規定により施行日前において新法第二百九十三条の規定の例による登録を受けた場合にあっては施行日）前であるときは、同日）において、委託者保護基金（新法第二百九十六条に規定する委託者保護基金をいう。以下同じ。）としての当該委託者保護会員制法人（第八項及び第九項において「委託者保護基金」という。）に承継されるものとし、補償基金協会は、その時において解散するものとする。この場合においては、他の法令中法人の解散及び清算に関する規定は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 115 (1) The provisions of Article 368 and Article 369 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a board of officers and Article 371 (excluding paragraph (3)) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an Investment Corporation. In this case, the phrase "of the directors" in Article 369, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "of the members," the terms "Directors" in paragraph (2) of that Article and "the directors and company auditors" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the corporate officer(s) and supervisory officers," the term "Directors" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Corporate officer(s) and supervisory officers," the phrase "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "by obtaining the permission of the Prime Minister," the term "the court" in paragraph (4) and paragraph (6) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
第百十五条　会社法第三百六十八条及び第三百六十九条の規定は役員会について、同法第三百七十一条（第三項を除く。）の規定は投資法人について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百六十九条第一項中「取締役の」とあるのは「構成員の」と、同条第二項中「取締役」とあり、及び同条第三項中「取締役及び監査役」とあるのは「執行役員及び監督役員」と、同条第五項中「取締役で」とあるのは「執行役員及び監督役員で」と、同法第三百七十一条第二項中「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣の許可を得て」と、同条第四項及び第六項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(8) Where a foreign financial institution, etc. that has submitted a written application for tax exemption has, after submission, changed its name or the location of its head office or principal office, the foreign financial institution, etc. shall, no later than the day preceding the day on which the foreign financial institution, etc. is to receive, for the first time since the date of change, payment of specified interest from the specified financial institution, etc. via which the said written application for tax exemption has been submitted, submit a written application stating the new name and location of the head office or principal office of the foreign financial institution, etc. and any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance, to the district director prescribed in paragraph (5) via the said specified financial institution, etc. In this case, where the foreign financial institution, etc. has failed to submit the said written application, the provision of paragraph (1) shall not apply to the specified interest to be received by the foreign financial institution, etc. from the said specified financial institution, etc. on or after the day on which the change has been made.
８　非課税適用申告書を提出した外国金融機関等が、当該非課税適用申告書を提出した後、その名称又は本店若しくは主たる事務所の所在地の変更をした場合には、その者は、その変更をした日以後最初に当該非課税適用申告書の提出をする際に経由した特定金融機関等から特定利子の支払を受けるべき日の前日までに、その変更をした後のその者の名称及び本店又は主たる事務所の所在地その他の財務省令で定める事項を記載した申告書を当該特定金融機関等を経由して第五項に規定する税務署長に提出しなければならない。この場合において、当該申告書を提出しなかつたときは、その該当することとなつた日以後に当該特定金融機関等から支払を受ける特定利子については、第一項の規定は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) A patent application under the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to have been filed at the time of filing of the application for the said utility model registration, provided that matters stated in the description, scope of claims or drawings attached to the application in the said patent application are within the scope of the matters stated in the description, scope of claims or drawings attached to the application in the said utility model registration application on which the said patent application is based; provided, however, that this shall not apply for the purpose of application of Article 29-2 of the Patent Act or Article 3-2 of the Utility Model Act, where the patent application falls under another patent application under the said Article of the Patent Act or the patent application under the said Article of the Utility Model Act, or for the purpose of application of Articles 30(4), the proviso to 36-2(2), 41(4), 43(1) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 43-2(3)) and 48-3(2).
２　前項の規定による特許出願は、その願書に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲又は図面に記載した事項が当該特許出願の基礎とされた実用新案登録の願書に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面に記載した事項の範囲内にあるものに限り、その実用新案登録に係る実用新案登録出願の時にしたものとみなす。ただし、その特許出願が第二十九条の二に規定する他の特許出願又は実用新案法第三条の二に規定する特許出願に該当する場合におけるこれらの規定の適用並びに第三十条第四項、第三十六条の二第二項ただし書、第四十一条第四項、第四十三条第一項（第四十三条の二第三項において準用する場合を含む。）及び第四十八条の三第二項の規定の適用については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) The provisions of paragraphs (2) to (6) of Article 178 (time limit for institution of action, etc.), 179 to 180-2 (appropriate party as defendant, notification of institution of action, opinion of the Commissioner of the Patent Office in litigations annulling a trial decision), 181(1) and 181(5) (rescission of trial decision or ruling) and 182 (delivery of original copy of judgment) of the Patent Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the actions under the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "the trial" in Article 178(2) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the examination or trial of the opposition to registration in the trial," the term "a trial for patent invalidation or a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of the term" in Article 179 of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 46(1), 50(1), 51(1), 52-2(1), 53(1) or 53-2 of the Trademark Act."
２　特許法第百七十八条第二項から第六項まで（出訴期間等）、第百七十九条から第百八十条の二まで（被告適格、出訴の通知及び審決取消訴訟における特許庁長官の意見）、第百八十一条第一項及び第五項（審決又は決定の取消し）並びに第百八十二条（裁判の正本の送付）の規定は、前項の訴えに準用する。この場合において、同法第百七十八条第二項中「当該審判」とあるのは「当該登録異議の申立てについての審理、審判」と、同法第百七十九条中「特許無効審判若しくは延長登録無効審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項、第五十条第一項、第五十一条第一項、第五十二条の二第一項、第五十三条第一項若しくは第五十三条の二の審判」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 4-2 (1) When a warning declaration about an earthquake disaster under the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 9 of the Act on Special Measures for Large-scale Earthquakes (Act No. 73 of 1978) (hereinafter referred to as "warning declaration" in this Article) is issued, insurance companies, etc. may not enter into any new earthquake insurance contract to be covered by the reinsurance contract of the government (excluding those prescribed by a Cabinet Order) for subjects located in areas pertaining to said warning declaration and designated as areas for intensified countermeasures against the earthquake by the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 3 of the same Act from the time when the warning declaration is issued until the day when the warning declaration is withdrawn under the provision of paragraph (3) of Article 9 of the same Act (or, where the large scale earthquake pertaining to the warning declaration does occur, until the day designated by the Minister of Finance in a public notice after consultation with the Earthquake Insurance Council).
第四条の二　大規模地震対策特別措置法（昭和五十三年法律第七十三号）第九条第一項の規定に基づく地震災害に関する警戒宣言（以下この条において「警戒宣言」という。）が発せられたときは、同法第三条第一項の規定により地震防災対策強化地域として指定された地域のうち当該警戒宣言に係る地域内に所在する保険の目的については、保険会社等は、当該警戒宣言が発せられた時から同法第九条第三項の規定に基づく地震災害に関する警戒解除宣言が発せられた日（当該警戒宣言に係る大規模な地震が発生するに至つた場合にあつては、財務大臣が地震保険審査会の議を経て告示により指定をする日）までの間、政府の再保険契約に係る地震保険契約（政令で定めるものを除く。）を新たに締結することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 57 (1) When a public notice with regard to city plans relating to urban area development projects pursuant to the provision of Article 20 paragraph (1) (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 21 paragraph (2)) or a public notice pertaining to urban area development projects or city planning facilities within urbanization promotion areas and/or city planning areas that have not been designated as either urbanization promotion areas or urbanization control areas pursuant to the provision of Article 55 paragraph (4) shall have been given, prefectural governors (if there are persons for whom public notice shall have been given pursuant to the provision of paragraph (4) of said Article as the other party of the notification pursuant to the provision of the main clause of the next paragraph, then such persons: hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall promptly give public notice of matters specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism and at the same time shall take necessary measures to cause right holders concerned to fully understand that there are restrictions pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive concerning transfer-for-counter value of land within the scheduled project sites pursuant to the provision of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism.
第五十七条　市街地開発事業に関する都市計画についての第二十条第一項（第二十一条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による告示又は市街地開発事業若しくは市街化区域若しくは区域区分が定められていない都市計画区域内の都市計画施設に係る第五十五条第四項の規定による公告があつたときは、都道府県知事（同項の規定により、次項本文の規定による届出の相手方として公告された者があるときは、その者。以下この条において同じ。）は、速やかに、国土交通省令で定める事項を公告するとともに、国土交通省令で定めるところにより、事業予定地内の土地の有償譲渡について、次項から第四項までの規定による制限があることを関係権利者に周知させるため必要な措置を講じなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 12 (1) In the event the volume of Oil Gas held by the Oil Gas Importer (means the volume of Oil Gas held by the Oil Gas Importer in compliance with the provisions of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry as provided in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article. Hereinafter the same in this Article) is less than the standard stockpiles and if the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry determines that there is no good reason for such shortage, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry may recommend such Oil Gas Importer to have and maintain Oil Gas in accordance with the provisions of the said paragraph within a set period of time, except in the case where such Oil Gas Importer obtains the approval as set forth in paragraph (2) of Article 8 applied mutatis mutandis in paragraph (2) of the preceding Article, and the total volume of Oil Gas held by such Oil Gas Importer and other Oil Gas Importers who also obtain such approval together with such Oil Gas Importer is equal to or more than the total volume of their standard stockpiles.
第十二条　経済産業大臣は、石油ガス輸入業者の石油ガス保有量（石油ガス輸入業者が前条第一項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより保有する石油ガスの数量をいう。以下この条において同じ。）が基準備蓄量に達していない場合において、その達していないことについて正当な理由がないと認めるときは、その石油ガス輸入業者に対し、期限を定めて、同項の規定に従つて石油ガスを保有すべきことを勧告することができる。ただし、その石油ガス輸入業者が前条第二項において準用する第八条第二項の規定による確認を受けている場合において、その者及びその者とともにその確認を受けている他の石油ガス輸入業者の石油ガス保有量を合計した数量がこれらの者の基準備蓄量を合計した数量以上であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

＜前へ 1 2 .... 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 次へ＞

例文データの著作権について

※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
本サービスで使用している「Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス」はWikipediaの日本語文を独立行政法人情報通信研究機構が英訳したものを、Creative Comons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0による利用許諾のもと使用しております。詳細はhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ および http://alaginrc.nict.go.jp/WikiCorpus/ をご覧下さい。