「edit.」の共起表現(1語右が「summary.」) - Weblio英語共起表現検索


小窓モード

プレミアム

ログイン
設定

設定

「edit.」の共起表現一覧(1語右が「summary.」)

該当件数 : 39



Reason given in their edit summary was "to remove parenthesis".
Snarky comments in the edit summary are inappropriate esp.
That edit summary was probably less than ideal.
I reverted the first removal as no edit summary was left.
So lets stop reverting with the edit summary "trolling" or "vandalism".
However, in the edit summary Wahkeenah suggested that the article sh
One thing though from your edit summary where you said "removed defunct complai
owever, the rationale for this (as given in the edit summary) was "LaMont was my best friend.
ion was deleted without any reason given in the edit summary by an anon, so I have restored it.
I was overly harsh when I signed one edit summary as dreadful....sorry....see you on Mice
So to flesh out my edit summary I feel that both titles should be in th
stand what is being attempted here and the last edit summary doesn't make it any clearer.
e category and mentioning the reference in your edit summary), plus
Correcting self: I suggested "RVV" in the edit summary but, after some help from WikiBlame, it
eeds to be removed, please give a reason in the edit summary or here on the talk page.
e Mandarin reading of the king's name, with the edit summary "He doesn't have the name of China."
I know I just copied and pasted this from my edit summary (adding the colon so it doesn't propaga
Fuhghettaboutit: I saw your edit summary about the need for an image, but the ex
Talk page discussion, and just the inflamatory edit summary, '"del one editor's POV," seems like bl
rge it, please link to the sandbox page in your edit summary (pretty essential for GFDL reasons).
oved roughly a third of this article , with the edit summary "Removed unsourced material, see WP:LP)
a change is too involved to be described in an edit summary, consider adding a longer summary here
/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
are to look for who started what; your previous edit summary was a bit provocative too.
Also, please label your changes in your edit summary, and try not to lump birth-date change
r [152.1.78.179 removed] the content without an edit summary or discussion and C.Fred reverted my un
you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
rding to this week, I forgot to add this in the edit summary so I thought I might notify you all her
a prison interior was recently removed with the edit summary: "photo of a prison makes no sense in t
on of this text the last time with only a brief edit summary, so I am providing a detailed explanati
ive editors", as you did referencing me in your edit summary, someone in your role should really tak
to those that died" (as expressed in your last edit summary) is a blatant NPOV violation.
aftermath section, and without even leaving an edit summary is blatant POV pushing.
ize that I didn't give a proper reference in my edit summary tonight so here is one I found on the n
MindMeal, in your edit summary with re-adding Category:Afro-Cuban jazz
never attended Southwestern, as you did in the edit summary - if you want to make the argument that
at we're not a news source but, as I said in my edit summary, we have full articles on things that h
As stated in the edit summary of the last revert by Tim Pope, the dat
                                                                                                   


こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する
英→日 日→英
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する

©2024 GRAS Group, Inc.RSS