「Course」を含む例文一覧(14412)

＜前へ 1 2 .... 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289
  • I take it that you are asking about the proposed amendment to the Insurance Business Act that has been passed to the current session for continued deliberation. I assume that you are questioning the appropriateness of a mutual aid business of a public interest corporation or the arrangement in which a mutual aid business of a given public interest corporation is to be supervised by the former competent authorities, with an implication that the FSA should be responsible for supervision. Well, the fact is that the respective authorities, having the experience of supervising public interest corporations for a long time, are well-versed with specifics of their operation. On the subject of this Act, I believe that I named several examples the other day, such as the Japan Medical Association, which has always been supervised by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare since the Meiji era, including the years of supervision by its predecessor, the Health and Medical Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. While circumstances vary from authority to authority, they know very extensively about internal affairs of those corporations and have exercised thorough supervision and, in that sense, have a set of knowledge of their operation and other information accumulated in the course of the work of supervision in the past, which accordingly makes them presumably capable of delivering more fine-tuned supervision than the FSA would be. Since the most important thing is policyholder protection, we believe that, from such a perspective, having the former authorities supervise them is an appropriate way to go. It is also in comprehensive consideration of overall circumstances, including the fact that this exemption of the Act is a provisional step, that we find it appropriate to have the former authorities continue to supervise those corporations.
    継続審議となっている保険業法の改正案のことだと思いますけれども、公益法人の共済事業あるいは旧主務官庁が監督することになっていますが、それはいかがなものかと、金融庁として監督すべきではないかという質問かと思いますけれども、公益法人というのは、それぞれの官庁が長い間、公益法人の監督をしてきたわけでございますから、その業務に関しては、各監督官庁が事情をよく知っており、この法律については、幾つかこの前も申し上げたと思いますが、例えば、日本医師会は確か明治以来、厚生省、当時の内務省衛生局が、ずっと監督官庁でございまして、各省色々ありますけれども、内部のことを非常によく知っており、各主務官庁がきめ細かい監督を行っていますから、そういった意味で、その業務に関する知見やこれまでの監督について蓄積している情報がございますので、金融庁に比べてより細かな監督を行うことができると考えられまして、契約者保護ということが一番大事ではございますが、そういった観点から（旧主務官庁が監督することが）適当というふうに考えております。そして、この法律の特例は当分の間という措置でございますので、そういったことを総合的に勘案して、引き続き旧主務官庁が監督することが適切だと考えております。 - 金融庁
  • (2) For the purpose of this section . “authorised officer” means a person or authority authorised by the government of the foreign state to keep and maintain a register or other record of trade marks under any written law in force in the foreign state relating to trade marks; “document” means - (a) a printed or written copy of or, extract from, the Register or other records of trade marks kept and maintained in the foreign state under any written law in force in the foreign state relating to trade marks; or (b) any other document pertaining to any matter or act in relation to trade marks registered in or otherwise recognised by the foreign state as trade marks; “trade mark” means any device, brand, heading, label, ticket, name, signature, word, letter, numeral or any combination thereof which is used or proposed to be used in relation to goods or services for the purpose of indicating or so as to indicate a connection in the course of trade between the goods or services and a person having the right either as proprietor or as registered user to use the trade mark (in the foreign state) whether with or without any indication of the identity of that person and which is registered or otherwise recognised by the foreign state as a trade mark (under any written law in force in the foreign state relating to trade marks) but does not include the trade marks of another foreign state registered in or otherwise recognised by the foreign state by virtue of a reciprocal arrangement between the foreign state and that other foreign state.
    (2) 本条において， 「権限ある公務員」とは，商標に関する外国の成文法に基づき商標登録簿又はその他商標に関する記録の調製と保管の権限を当該外国政府から与えられた者又は当局をいう。 「書類」とは，次をいう。 (a) 商標に関する外国の成文法に基づき当該外国で維持管理されている商標登録簿又はその他商標記録の印刷若しくは手書きの謄本又は抄本，又は (b) 外国で商標として登録され若しくはその他承認された商標に関する何らかの事項又は行為に係るその他の書類 「商標」とは，図案，ブランド，標題，ラベル，チケット，名称，署名，語，文字，数字又はそれらの組合せであって，当該商品又はサービスと所有者又は登録使用者として当該商標を(当該外国において)使用する権利を有する者との間の業としての関係を，その者の身元の表示の有無に拘らず，表示する目的で若しくは表示するために，何らかの商品又はサービスに関して使用されており若しくは使用される予定であり，かつ，(商標に関する当該外国の成文法に基づいて)当該外国で商標として登録され若しくはその他承認されているものをいう。ただし，当該外国において，他の外国との相互主義に基づく協定により当該外国が登録し又はその他承認している他の外国の商標を含まない。 - 特許庁
  • The Commissioner must not register a trade mark (trade mark A) in respect of any goods or services if it is identical to a trade mark ("trade mark B") belonging to a different owner and that is registered, or has priority under section 34 or section 36, in respect of the same goods or services; or in respect of goods or services that are similar to those goods and services, and its use is likely to deceive or confuse; or it is similar to a trade mark (trade mark C) that belongs to a different owner and that is registered, or has priority under section 34 or section 36, in respect of the same goods or services or goods or services that are similar to those goods or services, and its use is likely to deceive or confuse; or it is, or an essential element of it is, identical or similar to, or a translation of, a trade mark that is well known in New Zealand (trade mark D), whether through advertising or otherwise, in respect of those goods or services or similar goods or services or any other goods or services if the use of trade mark A would be taken as indicating a connection in the course of trade between those other goods or services and the owner of trade mark D, and would be likely to prejudice the interests of the owner.
    局長は，次に掲げる事情においては，何れかの商品又はサービスに関する商標(商標A)を登録してはならない。それが，他の所有者に属しており，かつ，登録されているか，又は第34条若しくは第36条に基づく優先権を有する商標(商標B)と同一であって，同一の商品又はサービスに関するものであるか，又はそれらの商品又はサービスに類似する商品若しくはサービスに関するものであり，それを使用すれば誤認又は混同を生じる虞がある場合それが，他の所有者に属しており，かつ，同一の商品若しくはサービス，又はそれらの商品若しくはサービスに類似する商品若しくはサービスに関して登録されているか，又は第34条若しくは第36条に基づく優先権を有する商標(商標C)と類似しており，それを使用すれば誤認又は混同を生じる虞がある場合それが，又はそれに係る何らかの本質的要素が，商標であって，それらの商品若しくはサービス，又は類似の商品若しくはサービス，又は他の何れかの商品若しくはサービスに関し，宣伝活動その他の何れかにより，ニュージーランドにおいて広く知られているもの(商標D)と同一であるか若しくは類似している，又はその翻訳である場合。ただし，商標Aを使用したとき，それらの他の商品又はサービスと商標Dの所有者との間に業としての関連を示すものと受け取られ，当該所有者の利益が害される虞があることを条件とする。 - 特許庁
  • As you know, DPJ President and Prime Minister Kan and (PNP) Chief Kamei had a leader meeting the day following the day Prime Minister Kan assumed office, I believe, during which a decision to form a coalition was made. As I happened to be the Secretary General back then, I was also present at this meeting to witness, as I have explained, President Kan and Chief Kamei reach an agreement on creating an alternative to the Ministerial Committee on Basic Policies, which had been set up for the previous three-party coalition to coordinate their policies. This has not been done because everyone got a little busy in preparation for the election, as I have just talked about. Another point is that members of the PNP, being one of the parties in the coalition, have naturally raised voices requesting strongly that views of the party be reflected in the coalition. It is therefore not so much about the ceiling debate, although there are, of course, voices raised on the subject of ceilings, as it is simply natural that a coalition government should need to coordinate policies. That is what I reminded Prime Minister Kan of today, and he responded by saying that it is a matter of fact and telling Policy Research Committee Chair and Minister of State Gemba to create a proper system for it. While I did have a talk with Mr. Gemba later on, this is an issue between parties and I am sure that it will accordingly be handled properly, as it should be, by the Chief, or Secretary General or Policy Research Committee Chair of our party.
    それはご存じのように、菅代表、総理と亀井（国民新党）代表との話し合いでも、これは総理大臣になった次の日でしたか、党首会談をやりましたね。そして、連立を組むということに決定したわけでございますが、そのとき私はたまたま幹事長でしたから、党首会談に同席させていただいておりまして、そのときも今さっき言いましたように、それまでは3党でしたから、基本政策閣僚会議というのが3党の政策のすり合わせでございましたが、そういったものにかわるものをつくろうということを菅代表と亀井代表と合意しておりまして、そういった意味で、これは今さっき話したような選挙で少しみんなお互いに忙しくなりましたので、やっておりませんし、また我が党内のこれはいろいろ当然連立政権でございますから、党内の意見も連立政権与党として反映したいという強い当然意見がございますので、そこら辺を踏まえてシーリングということよりも、シーリングにも当然意見があると思いますが、連立政権ですから、当然政策のすり合わせというのは、これは当然のことでございますから、そのことを改めて今日菅総裁に申し上げて、菅総理からも当然のことだし、きちっと玄葉政調会長、国務大臣にそのことをきちっとシステムをつくるようにということで、玄葉さんとあと話しましたけれども、党と党との話でもございますから、当然党首、あるいは幹事長、政調会長が我が党におりますから、そこら辺できちっとやっていこうといくというふうに思っていますよ。 - 金融庁
  • Our teacher dedicated his life to the study requiring great pains; as to "Koshi-den", at the end of the Bunka era (1804-1818), he began to write the draft, and by the early Bunsei era (1818-1830), about 12 volumes had been completed; however, by that time, he had also gradually gained an insight into the study and understood the teachings of the master of Suzunoya (Norinaga MOTOORI), then he realized that this world was the product of our great gods of Japan, so he decided to suspend "Koshi-den" temporarily, and first explore and read through all the past annotations of the histories of our country as well as those of India and Europe to use new knowledge to his advantage in writing "Koshi-den"; therefore, since the middle of the Bunsei era, he intensly studied foreign literature and culture mainly, and during a period of over 20 years, he completed almost all his works, which he left for us, including "Sekiken Taiko-den" (Japanese Early History); although he was never satisfied with his works, his students, of course, including myself, with a feeling of gratitude, thought that our master had succeeded in completing most his researches and studies, and were concerned about the delay in completing "Koshi-den" and because of our master's age, we repeatedly begged him to restart the writing, then thankfully at about the 10th year of the Tenpo era (1839), he restarted; however, he was requested to write on linguistic methods so he began to write "Goju Ongi" (Pronunciation and Meaning of 50 Kana) and suspended "Koshi-den" again; after a year, he was banished to Akita Province by order of the former bakufu (Japanese feudal government headed by a shogun), fortunately since Akita was his hometown and there were many relatives of his, besides the former load treated him very kindly, they relieved him off poor living, although under those conditions, he had no time to finish the remaining works; he was always concerned about those unfinished works, and after only a few years, he became sick and regrettably died.
    生涯苦心致され候中にも、古史伝は最初文化の末頃より草稿取り掛かり、文政の始め頃に、成文一二巻程は、ざっと稿本成り候ところ、段々見識博くあいなり、殊に故鈴屋大人の御遺教をも相伺れ候て、いよいよ以って、世界悉く我が皇大神達の御鎔造（ツクリカタメ）なされたる事を感得致され候に付、古史伝は先ず差し置き、赤縣州を始め、印度及び西洋の古伝をも悉く皆探索網羅して、其の上にて、充分に古史の註解をと存し込まれ候て、文政の半ば頃より、専ら外国の学に困苦致され、凡そ廿余年も歳月を過ごされ候て、赤縣太古傳を初め、即ち今此れある丈の著述は出来候へ共、中々もって先人の心底に叶ひ候事には此れ無く候へ共、大抵は見当も付き候に依っては、私を始め門人の中の所存にも、段々時節後れ、先人も老年に成られ候に付き、先ず先ず外国の所は大抵にして差し置かれ、古史伝の清撰をしきりて、相願い催促致し候て、天保10年頃より、漸々と其の方にも趣かれ候所、言語規則の書之無きに付き、余儀なく五十音義の撰にかかり、凡そ一ヵ年ほど打ち過ぎられ候所、旧幕府の命に依って秋田へ放逐、尤も同所は本国の事、親族共も少なからず、第一旧君侯より厚く恩遇も之有りて会計の辛苦は薄らぎ候へ共、著述致す可き遑なく、此処両三年心配致され候内に病を発し入幽致され候次第にて残念至極にて御座候。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • In the course of examination the Patent Office shall: refuse to recognize the subject matter of the application as an invention, in particular where the Office reveals that it does not concern any tangible creation susceptible of application, determined by means of technical features relating to its structure or composition, nor any particular technical way in which it affects a material, nor new use of a substance comprised in the state of the art; (ii)refuse to recognize the subject matter of the application as a new invention, where it may prove that all the technical features of the technical solution or of a variation of the technical solution contained in the application, taken together, are comprised in the state of the art and are not characterized by the production of unexpected effects; recognize the claimed invention that meets the criterion of novelty as a technical solution not involving an inventive step, where the Office may cite those documents from the state of the art, on the basis of which it may reasonably claim that the invention's capability of being carried out or applied is clearly implied by that state of the art, when taking into account average skills of a person skilled in the art; refuse to recognize the subject matter of the application as a technical solution susceptible of industrial application, in particular when it finds that it is infeasible for that solution to be used for manufacturing of the product or for the claimed process to be used in a technical sense.
    特許庁は，審査の過程において次のことを行う。 特に出願の主題が，構造又は構成に関する技術的特徴から判断して，出願可能な実体的な創造物に関係しておらず，また物質に作用する特定の技術的方法にも，技術水準に含まれる物質の新たな用途にも関係していないことを庁が明らかにした場合は，発明としての出願の主題の認容を拒絶する。出願に含まれる，技術的解決方法又はその変種の技術的特徴のすべてが，全体として技術水準に含まれており，かつ，予期できない効果の出現によって特徴付けられていないことを特許庁が証明することができる場合は，出願の主題を新たな発明として認容することを拒絶する。特許庁が技術水準から書類を引用することができ，その書類を基礎として特許庁が，当該技術の熟練者の平均的熟練度を考慮に入れたときに，発明が実施され又は利用される可能性が当該技術水準に明瞭に示されていることを合理的に主張することができる場合は，新規性の基準に適合するクレームされた発明を，進歩性を含まない技術的解決方法として認容する。 特に，製品の製造のために当該解決方法が実施されること又はクレームされた方法が技術的な意味で実施されることが不可能であることを特許庁が認めたときは，出願の主題を産業上の利用可能性のある技術的解決方法として認容することを拒絶する。 - 特許庁
  • We have already entered the home stretch in the study, and at today's cabinet meeting, the cabinet members were instructed to select truly priority items (bills), as the period of the upcoming extraordinary Diet session is short, and we have already notified the Cabinet Secretariat of our bill with its tentative name. What we can do to support SMEs within the authority of the FSA is limited, and as I have been saying, it is necessary to envision the prospect of the overall economy and set the broad course of government policy for economic growth, and the moratorium scheme alone would not provide a hopeful prospect for SMEs; it is also necessary to take concrete measures to increase the jobs and revenues of SMEs and small shops. Therefore, it is very important to implement measures other than those that can be taken within the small areas of the FSA's administrative jurisdiction. As basic polices are to be decided by the Basic Policy Cabinet Committee, which is comprised of the Prime Minister, Minister Fukushima and I, I am in a position to be involved in implementing measures outside the FSA's narrow areas of administrative jurisdiction as cabinet policy. While I do my best in this respect, I will ensure the drafting of a bill that can stand against your criticism as a measure to support SMEs within my area of jurisdiction, as we still have more time till we submit the bill. Senior Vice Minister Otsuka's working group has entered the home stretch in its study on the bill, and it will fix the details based on opinions collected from various sectors.
    もう第4コーナーを回ってホームストレッチに入りましたから、今も閣議で、今度の臨時国会は期間が短いので、その中で各省庁と重点的なものを整理して出してくれという話がありまして、うちは既に（内閣）官房のほうに、「（仮称）」を付けて（法案名を）提出しておりますが、これも中小・零細企業対策として、金融庁の権限の中でやれることは限られるわけですけれども、これは前から言っているように、もう経済全体の展開をきっちりと構成していく、経済成長に向かっていくという大きなかじ取りがなければならないし、具体的にそうした中小・零細企業、商店等の仕事なり、売上げが増えるための具体的な施策がなされていかなければ、返済を猶予するというようなことだけで、中小・零細企業が「よし頑張るぞ」という気分になるはずはありませんから、そういう狭い金融庁の行政の範囲外の施策、これが極めて大事なことでして、我々としては、私の場合は、総理、私、福島大臣の閣僚の基本委員会、そこで基本的な政策等は決めていくという形にもなっているわけですから、そういう意味では、金融庁の狭い守備範囲だけではなくて、今言ったようなことも、私としては内閣の方針としてそれをやっていくことに関与できる立場におりますから、そういう面も、今後、全力を挙げてやっていきながら、私の守備範囲の中での中小・零細企業対策として、必ず、今、ホームストレッチに入っていますけれども、ちゃんとした法案が仕上げられると思いますから、あと、大塚副大臣のところで、最後の詰めを、今からいろいろな各界から話を更に聞きながら、まだ提出まで時間がありますから、皆さん方の批判にも耐えられるようなちゃんとしたものに仕上げてまいります - 金融庁
  • Article 21 A person upon whom the assistance punishment prescribed in Article 16, paragraph (1), item (i) is to be enforced shall be regarded as a person upon whom imprisonment with work is to be enforced; a person upon whom the assistance punishment prescribed in item (ii) of the same paragraph is to be enforced shall be regarded as a person upon whom imprisonment without work is to be enforced; the assistance punishment prescribed in item (i) of the same paragraph shall be regarded as imprisonment with work; the assistance punishment in item (ii) of the same paragraph shall be regarded as imprisonment without work; and the following provisions shall apply for the purpose of enforcing the assistance punishment: Article 22, Article 24, Article 28, Article 29, Articles 31 to 33 and Article 34, paragraph (1) of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), Article 474, Articles 480 to 482, Articles 484 to 489, Articles 502 to 504 and Article 507 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 2, paragraph (1), Article 27, paragraph (1), Article 56, Article 57 and Article 61 of the Juvenile Act (Act No. 168 of 1948), Article 1, Article 2, Articles 4 to 9, Article 10, paragraph (1), Article 10-2, Article 13, Article 14, paragraphs (1), (4) and (5), Articles 14-2 to 16, Article 17, paragraph (2), Article 17-2 and Article 17-4 to Article 17-6 of the Juvenile Training Schools Act (Act No. 169 of 1948) and Article 3, Article 4, paragraph (2), Articles 11 to 14, Article 16, Articles 23 to 30, Article 33, Article 34, paragraph (1), Articles 35 to 40, Article 48, Article 49, paragraph (1), Article 50, Article 51, Article 52, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 53, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 54, paragraph (2), Articles 55 to 58, Articles 60 to 65, Articles 75 to 77, Article 82, Articles 84 to 88 and Articles 91 to 98 of the Offenders Rehabilitation Act (Act No. 88 of 2007). In such a case, the "one-third" in Article 28 of the Penal Code shall be, "one-third (including the number of days an incoming sentenced person has been detained in the enforcement of the foreign punishment as defined in Article 2, item (i) of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "foreign punishment"), rendered in the final and binding decision with regard to the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer as defined in Article 2, item (xi) of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer") in a sentencing state as defined in Article 2, item (vii) of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "sentencing state"))"; "10 years" shall be "10 years (including the number of days an incoming sentenced person has been detained in the enforcement of the foreign punishment rendered in the final and binding decision with regard to the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer in the sentencing state)"; "after a sentence has become final and binding" in Article 32 of the same code shall be "after the surrender by a sentencing state in accordance with the order prescribed in Article 13 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons"; "two or more" and "the greatest among the punishments" in Article 474 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall be "assistance punishment as defined in Article 2, item (ii) of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "assistance punishment")"; "the other punishment" in the same Article shall be "the principal punishment"; "the public prosecutors office responding to the court that has rendered the punishment" in Article 480 and Article 482 of the same code shall be "the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office"; "category of punishment" in Article 487 of the same code shall be "types of assistance punishment"; "a person upon whom a decision is to be enforced" in Article 502 in the same code shall be "a person upon whom the assistance punishment is to be enforced"; "the court that rendered such decision" in the same Article shall be "the Tokyo District Court"; and "a judgment of guilty has become final and binding against an individual in the course of enforcement of a protective measure" in Article 27, paragraph (1) of the Juvenile Act and "a sentence of imprisonment with or without work, or of penal detention has become final and binding in the course of enforcement of a protective measure" in Article 57 in the same code shall be "a person with regard to whom assistance punishment as defined in item (ii) of Article 2 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons is to be enforced and who is currently undergoing a protective measure"; additional technicalities requiring alternative readings in connection with the application of these provisions shall be determined by a Cabinet order.
    第二十一条　共助刑の執行に関しては、第十六条第一項第一号の共助刑の執行を受ける者を懲役に処せられた者と、同項第二号の共助刑の執行を受ける者を禁錮に処せられた者と、同項第一号の共助刑を懲役と、同項第二号の共助刑を禁錮とそれぞれみなして、刑法（明治四十年法律第四十五号）第二十二条、第二十四条、第二十八条、第二十九条、第三十一条から第三十三条まで及び第三十四条第一項、刑事訴訟法第四百七十四条、第四百八十条から第四百八十二条まで、第四百八十四条から第四百八十九条まで、第五百二条から第五百四条まで及び第五百七条、少年法（昭和二十三年法律第百六十八号）第二条第一項、第二十七条第一項、第五十六条、第五十七条及び第六十一条、少年院法（昭和二十三年法律第百六十九号）第一条、第二条、第四条から第九条まで、第十条第一項、第十条の二、第十三条、第十四条第一項、第四項及び第五項、第十四条の二から第十六条まで、第十七条第二項、第十七条の二並びに第十七条の四から第十七条の六まで並びに更生保護法（平成十九年法律第八十八号）第三条、第四条第二項、第十一条から第十四条まで、第十六条、第二十三条から第三十条まで、第三十三条、第三十四条第一項、第三十五条から第四十条まで、第四十八条、第四十九条第一項、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十二条第二項及び第三項、第五十三条第二項及び第三項、第五十四条第二項、第五十五条から第五十八条まで、第六十条から第六十五条まで、第七十五条から第七十七条まで、第八十二条、第八十四条から第八十八条まで並びに第九十一条から第九十八条までの規定を適用する。この場合において、刑法第二十八条中「三分の一」とあるのは「三分の一（国際受刑者移送法第二条第七号の裁判国（以下「裁判国」という。）において同法第二条第十一号の受入移送犯罪（以下「受入移送犯罪」という。）に係る確定裁判において言い渡された同法第二条第一号の外国刑（以下「外国刑」という。）の執行としての拘禁をしたとされる日数を含む。）」と、「十年」とあるのは「十年（裁判国において受入移送犯罪に係る確定裁判において言い渡された外国刑の執行としての拘禁をしたとされる日数を含む。）」と、同法第三十二条中「刑の言渡しが確定した後」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第十三条の命令により裁判国から引渡しを受けた後」と、刑事訴訟法第四百七十四条中「二以上の」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第二条第二号の共助刑（以下「共助刑」という。）と」と、「その重いもの」とあり、及び「重い刑」とあるのは「共助刑」と、「他の刑」とあるのは「主刑」と、同法第四百八十条及び第四百八十二条中「刑の言渡をした裁判所に対応する検察庁」とあるのは「東京地方検察庁」と、同法第四百八十七条中「刑名」とあるのは「共助刑の種類」と、同法第五百二条中「裁判の執行を受ける者」とあるのは「共助刑の執行を受ける者」と、「言渡をした裁判所」とあるのは「東京地方裁判所」と、少年法第二十七条第一項中「保護処分の継続中、本人に対して有罪判決が確定した」とあり、及び同法第五十七条中「保護処分の継続中、懲役、禁錮又は拘留の刑が確定した」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第二条第二号の共助刑の執行を受ける者が保護処分の継続中である」とし、その他これらの規定の適用に関し必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) Every corporation whose total assets (meaning the amount of total assets appearing in the latest balance sheet; the same shall apply hereinafter) exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than two billion yen, and whose total assets, coupled with total assets of subsidiaries of the said corporation, and a corporation in Japan which holds majority of voting rights of all stockholders of the said corporation (hereinafter referred to as "sum of the total assets"), exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than ten billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "stockholding corporation" in this Article), in case that it acquires or holds the stocks (including the stocks held in monetary or security trust, where the stockholding corporation is a settlor or beneficiary and may exercise the voting rights or give instructions to the trustee regarding the exercise of such voting rights) of another corporation in Japan whose total assets exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than one billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "issuing corporation" in this Article), so that the ratio of voting rights pertaining to the stocks acquired or held by the stockholding corporation to voting rights of all stockholders of the issuing corporation is to exceed the percentage figure provided for in a Cabinet Order (in the case that more than one percentage figures are provided for, any of such percentage figures pursuant to the provisions of such Cabinet Order), shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission, a written report on such stocks within thirty days from the date of the relevant exceeding; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the all the issued stocks of issuing corporation is acquired simultaneously with the incorporation, cases where a corporation engaged in banking or insurance business (excluding certain corporations engaged in insurance business as provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article) acquires or holds stocks of other corporations in Japan (excluding those engaged in banking or insurance business and those as otherwise provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article), or cases where a corporation engaged in securities business (excluding securities brokers) acquires or holds stocks in the course of its business.
    ２　会社であつて、その総資産の額（最終の貸借対照表による資産の合計金額をいう。以下同じ。）が二十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超え、かつ、当該会社並びに当該会社の子会社及び当該会社の総株主の議決権の過半数を有する国内の会社の総資産の額を合計した額（以下「総資産合計額」という。）が百億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの（以下この条において「株式所有会社」という。）は、他の国内の会社であつてその総資産の額が十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの（以下この項において「株式発行会社」という。）の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合（金銭又は有価証券の信託に係る株式について、自己が、委託者若しくは受益者となり議決権を行使することができる場合又は議決権の行使について受託者に指図を行うことができる場合を含む。）において、株式発行会社の総株主の議決権に占める株式所有会社の当該取得し、又は所有する株式に係る議決権の割合が、百分の十を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める数値（複数の数値を定めた場合にあつては、政令で定めるところにより、それぞれの数値）を超えることとなるときは、公正取引委員会規則で定めるところにより、その超えることとなつた日から三十日以内に、当該株式に関する報告書を公正取引委員会に提出しなければならない。ただし、株式発行会社の発行済の株式の全部をその設立と同時に取得する場合、銀行業又は保険業を営む会社が他の国内の会社（銀行業又は保険業を営む会社その他公正取引委員会規則で定める会社を除く。次条第一項及び第二項において同じ。）の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合及び証券業を営む会社（証券仲介業者を除く。）が業務として株式を取得し、又は所有する場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (7) Where a nonresident or foreign corporation receives payment of interest on general foreign-issued company bonds issued during the period from April 1, 1998, to March 31, 2008, which fall under the category of specified foreign-issued company bonds and for which the nonresident or foreign corporation has, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, entrusted custody with the person in charge of handling payment, if [1] the said person in charge of handling payment thus entrusted with custody (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "person in charge of handling custody and payment") who provides intermediary, brokerage or agent services (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "intermediary services, etc.") for the receipt of interest on the said specified foreign-issued company bonds has, before receiving the delivery of such interest in the course of the intermediary services, etc., given notice of the matters specified in each of the following items for the category listed in the relevant item and any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance with respect to the person who is to receive the interest (excluding interest subject to the provision of Article 3-3(3) or (6); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) (these matters hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and paragraph (14) as "interest recipient information"), to the person who pays the interest (in the case where the interest is delivered via another person in charge of handling payment with whom the said person in charge of handling custody and payment has further entrusted custody, notice shall be given to the person who pays the interest via such other person in charge of handling payment), and [2] the person who pays the interest has, upon payment of the interest, prepared a document stating the matters concerning the person who is to receive the interest and any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance (limited to a document prepared based on the information on the interest recipient provided by the said person in charge of handling custody and payment; referred to in paragraph (9) and paragraph (14) as the "interest recipient confirmation document"), and submitted it to the competent district director having jurisdiction over the place for tax payment prescribed in Article 17 of the Income Tax Act which pertains to the person who makes payment in terms of the said interest (in the case where another place has been designated pursuant to the provision of Article 18(2) of the said Act: the designated place for tax payment), the said nonresident or foreign corporation shall be deemed to have submitted a written application for tax exemption pursuant to the provision of paragraph (4) with respect to the interest receivable thereby:
    ７　非居住者又は外国法人が、平成十年四月一日から平成二十年三月三十一日までの間に発行された一般民間国外債のうち特定民間国外債であつて支払の取扱者に政令で定めるところにより保管の委託をしているものにつきその利子の支払を受ける場合において、当該保管の委託を受けている支払の取扱者（以下この項において「保管支払取扱者」という。）で当該特定民間国外債の利子の受領の媒介、取次ぎ又は代理（以下この項において「媒介等」という。）をするものが、その媒介等に基づきその利子の交付を受けるときまでに、その利子（第三条の三第三項又は第六項の規定の適用があるものを除く。以下この項において同じ。）の支払を受けるべき者につき次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応じ当該各号に定める事項その他財務省令で定める事項（以下この項及び第十四項において「利子受領者情報」という。）をその利子の支払をする者に対し（その利子の交付が、当該保管支払取扱者が保管の再委託をしている他の支払の取扱者を通じて行われる場合には、当該他の支払の取扱者を経由してその利子の支払をする者に対し）通知をし、かつ、その利子の支払をする者が、その利子の支払を行う際その利子の支払を受けるべき者に関する事項その他の財務省令で定める事項を記載した書類（当該保管支払取扱者から通知をされた利子受領者情報に基づき記載されたものに限る。第九項及び第十四項において「利子受領者確認書」という。）を作成し、これをその支払をする者の当該利子に係る所得税法第十七条の規定による納税地（同法第十八条第二項の規定による指定があつた場合には、その指定をされた納税地）の所轄税務署長に提出したときは、当該非居住者又は外国法人は、その支払を受けるべき利子につき第四項の規定による非課税適用申告書の提出をしたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
＜前へ 1 2 .... 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289

例文データの著作権について