「In effect」を含む例文一覧(31340)
＜前へ 1 2 .... 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 次へ＞- Article 4 (1) A person who wishes to create or import and make Type 1 Use of living modified organisms or other persons who wish to make Type 1 Use of living modified organisms must stipulate regulations for said Type 1 Use for each type of living modified organism (hereinafter referred to as "Type 1 Use Regulations"), and must obtain the approval of the competent minister for the same, provided, however, that this shall not apply when wishing to make Type 1 Use of living modified organisms which, by virtue of their properties or other features, are designated by the competent minister as organisms that clearly cause no Adverse Effect on Biological Diversity due to Type 1 Use (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Living Modified Organisms"), or when wishing to make Type 1 Use as stipulated in Type 1 Use Regulations for which the approval of the competent minister has been obtained under the provisions of this paragraph or Article 9 paragraph (1) [or, in the case of Type 1 Use Regulations that have been altered by the competent minister under the provisions of Article 7 paragraph (1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 9 paragraph (4)), said Type 1 Use Regulations after alteration], or in other cases stipulated in the ordinance of the competent ministries.
第四条 遺伝子組換え生物等を作成し又は輸入して第一種使用等をしようとする者その他の遺伝子組換え生物等の第一種使用等をしようとする者は、遺伝子組換え生物等の種類ごとにその第一種使用等に関する規程（以下「第一種使用規程」という。）を定め、これにつき主務大臣の承認を受けなければならない。ただし、その性状等からみて第一種使用等による生物多様性影響が生じないことが明らかな生物として主務大臣が指定する遺伝子組換え生物等（以下「特定遺伝子組換え生物等」という。）の第一種使用等をしようとする場合、この項又は第九条第一項の規定に基づき主務大臣の承認を受けた第一種使用規程（第七条第一項（第九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定に基づき主務大臣により変更された第一種使用規程については、その変更後のもの）に定める第一種使用等をしようとする場合その他主務省令で定める場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - After the subway facilities were completed, Kyoto Kosoku Railway Co., Ltd., bought the subway facilities from the Japan Railway Construction Public Corporation using a 25-year installment plan in order to lend them to the Kyoto Municipal Transportation Bureau, which would in turn operate the section between Daigo and Nijo integrally, and accordingly the Kyoto Municipal Transportation Bureau became a Type I Railway Business Operator for the sections between Daigo and Misasagi and between Sanjo-keihan and Nijo, as well as a Type II Railway Business Operator for the section between Misasagi and Sanjo-keihan, while Kyoto Kosoku Railway Co., Ltd., became a Type Ⅲ Railway Business Operator for the section between Misasagi and Sanjo-keihan based on the Railway Business Act, which had taken effect after the abolishment of the old local railway law when Japanese National Railways was split and privatized on April 1, 1987, whereby Keihan Electric Railway was also positioned as a Type II Railway Business Operator; therefore, the idea of continuing passenger services in the section between Misasagi and Sanjo on the Keishin Line, borrowing the subway facilities from Kyoto Kosoku Railway Co., Ltd., in cooperation with Kyoto Municipal Transportation Bureau to underground and change the route of the relevant section was re-examined; however, the parties involved decided to follow the established policy due to overhead expenses.
そして、鉄道施設の完成後、京都高速鉄道が日本鉄道建設公団から25年間の分割払いで鉄道施設を譲り受け、京都市交通局に貸与し、京都市交通局が醍醐～二条間を一体的に運営することになり、1987年4月1日の国鉄分割民営化によって、それまでの「地方鉄道法」が廃止され、新たに「鉄道事業法」が施行されたことによって、京都市交通局が醍醐～御陵間と三条京阪～二条間の第一種鉄道事業者、御陵～三条京阪間の第二種鉄道事業者となり、京都高速鉄道が御陵～三条京阪間の第三種鉄道事業者となったことから、京阪電気鉄道も第二種鉄道事業者という経営形態が確立されたため、京津線の御陵～三条間の旅客営業を廃止せず、京都市交通局とともに京都高速鉄道から鉄道施設を借り受け、同区間の地下化、ルート変更する形で旅客営業を継続してはどうかと再検討されたが、諸経費などの絡みで既定方針どおりとなった。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス - Article 119 (1) The provisions of Article 462(2) and (3) (Liability Related to Dividends of Surplus) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the directors of a Specific Purpose Company pursuant to Article 117 of this Act, Article 463 (Restrictions on Remedy Over Against Shareholders) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the members of a Specific Purpose Company, Article 464 (Liability Where Shares Are Acquired in Response to Demand for Purchase) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company who has responded to a request under Article 153 of this Act and Article 465(2) (Liability in Cases of Damage) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company under the preceding Article. In this case, the term "Executing Persons" in Article 462(2) and (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director prescribed in that Article," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the time of the act listed in each item of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 462(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount provided in Article 114(1) or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "the acts listed in each item of Article 461(1)," "the total book value of the Monies, Etc.," and "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such act takes effect" in Article 463(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the distribution of profits or Payment of Interim Dividends under the provisions of Article 114 of the Asset Securitization Act," "the amount of Dividends or the amount of Distribution," and "the amount prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "the book value of the Monies, etc." in Article 463(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount of Cash Dividends or the amount of Cash Distributions," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such payment is made" in Article 464(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount set forth in Article 114(1) of the Asset Securitization Act pertaining to the business year that contains such payment (in cases where the business year immediately preceding such business year is not the most recent business year, the business year immediately preceding such business year)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
第百十九条 会社法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項（剰余金の配当等に関する責任）の規定は第百十七条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十三条（株主に対する求償権の制限等）の規定は特定目的会社の社員について、同法第四百六十四条（買取請求に応じて株式を取得した場合の責任）の規定は第百五十三条の規定による請求に応じた特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十五条第二項（欠損が生じた場合の責任）の規定は前条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項中「業務執行者」とあるのは「同条に規定する取締役」と、同項中「前条第一項各号に掲げる行為の時における分配可能額」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条第一項又は第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同法第四百六十三条第一項中「第四百六十一条第一項各号に掲げる行為」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条の規定による利益の配当又は中間配当」と、「金銭等の帳簿価額の総額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、「当該行為がその効力を生じた日における分配可能額」とあるのは「同条第一項又は資産流動化法第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同条第二項中「金銭等の帳簿価額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、同法第四百六十四条第一項中「当該支払の日における分配可能額」とあるのは「当該支払が属する事業年度（その事業年度の直前の事業年度が最終事業年度でないときは、その事業年度の直前の事業年度）に係る資産流動化法第百十四条第一項の額」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a report submitted under the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "Share Buyback Report"), and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Share Buyback Report contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks a statement an important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of such statement or such other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day when the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day when the notification is to take effect" and the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Share Buyback Report (meaning report to be submitted under Article 24-6(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 10(1) and Article 22), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Share Buyback Report for the public interest or protection of investors," "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "to submit an amendment report," respectively; the term "persons specified in Article 21(1)(i) and (iii)" and the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who, at the time of submission of the Share Buyback Report, is an Officer of the company having submitted the Share Buyback Report" and "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Share Buyback Report," respectively; the terms "Article 21(2)(i) and (ii)" and "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(2)(i)" and "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-6(2)," respectively.
２ 第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は前項に規定する報告書（以下「自己株券買付状況報告書」という。）について、第二十二条の規定は自己株券買付状況報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けている場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書（第二十四条の六第一項に規定する報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。）」と、「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と、第二十二条第一項中「第二十一条第一項第一号及び第三号に掲げる者」とあるのは「当該自己株券買付状況報告書を提出した会社のその提出の時における役員」と、「有価証券届出書の届出者が発行者である有価証券を募集又は売出しによらないで取得した者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者が発行者である有価証券を取得した者」と、同条第二項中「第二十一条第二項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「第二十一条第二項第一号」と、「前項」とあるのは「第二十四条の六第二項において準用する前項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) If it is proved either . (a) that there is a well known and established use of the word or words as the name or description of the article or substance by a person or persons carrying on a trade therein, not being use in relation to goods connected in the course of trade with the proprietor or a registered user of the trade mark or, in the case of certification trade mark goods certified by the proprietor; (b) that the artic1e or substance was formerly manufactured under a patent, that a period of two years after the cesser of the patent has elapsed and that the word is or words are the only practicable name or description of the article of substance; or (c) that there is a well known and established use of the word or words as the name or description of some service by a person or persons providing services which include that service, not being use in relation to services the provision of which the proprietor or registered user of the trade mark is connected to in the course of trade, [Ins. Act A881] subsection (3) shall have effect.
(2) 次の何れかが証明された場合は，(3)が適用されるものとする。 (a) 前項に該当する物品又は物質の名称若しくは説明として当該物品又は物質の取引を行う者によって使用される1若しくは複数の語の使用が確立され周知となっている場合において，当該使用が，当該商標の所有者又は登録使用者と業として関係する商品についての使用でなく，また当該商標が証明商標であるときは，その所有者が証明する商品についての使用でもないこと (b) 当該物品又は物質が過去において特許に基づいて製造されており，その特許の失効後2年の期間が経過しており，かつ，1若しくは複数の語が当該物品又は物質の唯一の実際的名称又は説明であること，又は (c) あるサービスの名称若しくは説明として当該サービスを含むサービスを提供している者によってなされる1若しくは複数の語の使用が確立され周知となっている場合において，その使用が，当該商標の所有者又は登録使用者が業として関係しているサービスの提供に関しての使用でないこと［法律A881による挿入］ - 特許庁 - Where a trade mark has been removed from the Register for non-payment of the fee for renewal, it shall, nevertheless, for the purpose of an application for the registration of a trade mark within one year from the date of expiration of the last registration be deemed to be a trade mark which is already on the Register except that this section shall not have effect when the Registrar is satisfied either - (a) that there has been no use in good faith of the trade mark which has been removed during the two years immediately preceding its removal; or (b) that no deception or confusion is likely to arise from the use of the trade mark which is the subject of the application for registration by reason of any previous use of the trade mark which has been removed.
商標が更新手数料の不納の故に登録簿から抹消された場合においても，当該商標は，最終登録満了日から1年以内になされる商標登録出願の目的では，登録簿に存在する商標として扱われるものとする。ただし，本条は，登録官が次の何れかの事由を認定する場合は適用されない。 (a) 登録を抹消された商標の善意の使用が，その抹消の直前2年間になかったこと，又は (b) 抹消された商標の従前の使用を理由として，登録出願の対象である商標の使用が，何らの誤認若しくは混同も生じさせる虞がないこと - 特許庁 - Pending applications shall retain their priority date or original date of filing with the Bureau of Patents Trademarks and Technology Transfer. Applicants which elected to prosecute their applications under Republic Act No. 166 and its Implementing Rules and Regulations under which they were required to submit proof of use of the Mark, particularly with reference to applications for registrations based on use in the Philippines, shall file the corresponding declaration of actual use with evidence to that effect as prescribed by these Regulations, without need of any notice from the Office, within three years from the effectivity of these Regulations, without possibility of extension. Otherwise, the application shall be refused or the mark shall be removed from the register by the Director motu prorio. [As amended by Office Order No. 17 (1998)]
係属出願は，その優先日又は特許・商標・技術移転局への原出願日を維持する。共和国法律第166号及びその施行規則は，標章使用の証拠を要件としており，フィリピンにおける使用に基づく登録出願に特に言及しているが，当該法律及び規則に基づいて，自己の出願を遂行することを選択した出願人は，庁からの通知がなくても，本規則に対応する実際の使用の宣言及びその証拠を，本規則の施行から延長の認められない3年以内に，提出しなければならない。そうしなかった場合は，出願は，拒絶されるか又は標章が局長の職権により登録簿から抹消される。 - 特許庁 - Article 375 (1) Where the court makes a judgment to uphold a claim, when it finds it particularly necessary while taking into consideration the defendant's financial resources and any other circumstances concerned, it may stipulate in the judgment a provision concerning the period for payment of money pertaining to the claim that it upholds or provision authorizing installment payment with regard to such payment of money, both of which shall be within three years from the date of rendition of the judgment, or simultaneously stipulate a provision to the effect that if the defendant has made a payment pursuant to the provision concerning the period or has made a payment without losing, pursuant to the provision of the following paragraph, the benefit of time under the provision authorizing installment payment, he/she shall be exempted from the obligation to pay any delay damages accrued after the filing of the action.
第三百七十五条 裁判所は、請求を認容する判決をする場合において、被告の資力その他の事情を考慮して特に必要があると認めるときは、判決の言渡しの日から三年を超えない範囲内において、認容する請求に係る金銭の支払について、その時期の定め若しくは分割払の定めをし、又はこれと併せて、その時期の定めに従い支払をしたとき、若しくはその分割払の定めによる期限の利益を次項の規定による定めにより失うことなく支払をしたときは訴え提起後の遅延損害金の支払義務を免除する旨の定めをすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (4) Where propagating material, harvested material or processed products of a registered variety etc. has been transferred by the holder of the breeder's right, the holder of an exclusive exploitation right or the holder of a non-exclusive exploitation right, or as the result of the acts listed in any of the items of paragraph (1) of this Article, the effect of the breeder's right for the said registered variety shall not extend to the exploitation of the transferred propagating material, harvested material or processed products. However, this shall not apply to the acts which involve further propagation of the said registered variety etc., nor to the exporting of propagating material of the said registered variety to a state which does not provide protection for the plant genus or species to which that registered variety belongs, nor to the exporting of harvested material of the said registered variety to such a state for a purpose other than final consumption.
４ 育成者権者、専用利用権者若しくは通常利用権者の行為又は第一項各号に掲げる行為により登録品種等の種苗、収穫物又は加工品が譲渡されたときは、当該登録品種の育成者権の効力は、その譲渡された種苗、収穫物又は加工品の利用には及ばない。ただし、当該登録品種等の種苗を生産する行為、当該登録品種につき品種の育成に関する保護を認めていない国に対し種苗を輸出する行為及び当該国に対し最終消費以外の目的をもって収穫物を輸出する行為については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 5 (1) The Heads of Ministries and Agencies etc. shall, when there is a demand under the provisions of Article 3, paragraph 1 and paragraph 2, perform the necessary investigation if it is possible to impose disciplinary actions based on the National Public Service Act and the Local Public Service Act, upon the employees involved in said bid rigging etc. Such action shall mean dismissal, suspension of duties, a cut in salary, or warning and other sanctions in the case of specified corporations (excluding specified incorporated administrative agencies - meaning incorporated administrative agencies (stipulated under Article 2, paragraph 2 of the Act on General Rules for Incorporated Administrative Agencies (Act No. 103 of 1999); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) and excluding specified local incorporated administrative agencies - meaning specified local incorporated administrative agencies (stipulated under Article 2, paragraph 2 of the Act on Local Incorporated Administrative Agencies (Act No. 118 of 2003); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph). Provided, however, that the Heads of Ministries and Agencies, heads of specified incorporated administrative agencies or heads of specified local incorporated administrative agencies, in cases where they do not have the appointive power of the said employees (including cases where the appointive power of the said employees was assigned), it shall suffice if the notification was made to the person with appointive power (including the person who was assigned the appointive power of the said employees; hereinafter referred to as "appointer") to the effect that the demand under the provisions of Article 3, paragraph 1 or paragraph 2, was received.
第五条 各省各庁の長等は、第三条第一項又は第二項の規定による求めがあったときは、当該入札談合等関与行為を行った職員に対して懲戒処分（特定法人（特定独立行政法人（独立行政法人通則法（平成十一年法律第百三号）第二条第二項に規定する特定独立行政法人をいう。以下この項において同じ。）及び特定地方独立行政法人（地方独立行政法人法（平成十五年法律第百十八号）第二条第二項に規定する特定地方独立行政法人をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を除く。）にあっては、免職、停職、減給又は戒告の処分その他の制裁）をすることができるか否かについて必要な調査を行わなければならない。ただし、当該求めを受けた各省各庁の長、地方公共団体の長、特定独立行政法人の長又は特定地方独立行政法人の理事長が、当該職員の任命権を有しない場合（当該職員の任命権を委任した場合を含む。）は、当該職員の任命権を有する者（当該職員の任命権の委任を受けた者を含む。以下「任命権者」という。）に対し、第三条第一項又は第二項の規定による求めがあった旨を通知すれば足りる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (6) The provisions of subsection (5) shall cease to have effect with regard to any registered user of a trade mark . (a) if the trade mark ceases to be a registered trade mark for any reason; (b) if the goods or services for which the trade mark is registered are subsequently limited so as to exclude any or all of the goods or services in respect of which the registration of the registered user has been made; (c) if the registered proprietor ceases to exercise control over the use of the trade mark and over the quality of the goods or services provided by the registered user concerned in relation to that trade mark; (d) at the date of expiration of the last registration of the trade mark unless a fresh application under subsection (2) accompanies any application for renewal of the registration of that trade mark; (e) at the date of any assignment or transmission of the registered trade mark, unless and until the devolution of title is recorded on the Register in accordance with the provisions of this Act and the subsequent proprietor of the registered trade mark makes a fresh application under subsection (2).
(6) (5)は，次の場合は，何れの商標の登録使用者についても効力を失う。 (a) 当該商標が何らかの理由で登録商標でなくなった場合 (b) 当該商標の登録に係る商品又はサービスが登録後に制限され，登録使用者の登録の対象であった商品又はサービスの全部又は一部が除外されることになった場合 (c) 登録所有者が，当該商標の使用について及び当該商標の登録使用者が提供する商品又はサービスの質について管理を行わなくなった場合 (d) 当該商標の最終登録満了日において，(2)に基づく新たな申請が当該商標の登録更新申請を伴っていない場合 (e) 当該登録商標の譲渡又は移転の日において，権原の移転が本法の規定に従って登録簿に登録されていない場合は，それが登録されるまで，また，当該登録商標の後の所有者が(2)に基づく新たな申請をしていない場合は，それがされるまで - 特許庁 - As I commented last week, a consumer loan market that offers small, unsecured, unguaranteed loans is, in my view, something that society needs after all. In that sense, I do not think that there will be any urgent need to review the Money Lending Act as a result of Takefuji's filing for the commencement of corporate reorganization proceedings. However, given the existence of a market that I have just mentioned, and the fact that the multiple-debt problem developed into a very serious problem, the recent revision to the Money Lending Act, which represents a fundamental and comprehensive step to address the issue that includes lowering upper interest-rate limits and introducing a cap on the total amount of borrowing, was enacted with unanimous support from all parties. After I assumed office, the FSA has been working, mainly in its Revised Money Lending Act Follow-Up Team, to follow up on the situation after the revised Money Lending Act took full effect, including any moves made by money lending businesses.
私は大変時宜を得た質問だと思っています。私もこの前、先週申し上げたように、やはり少額、無担保、無保証と、この消費者金融の市場というのはご存じのようにあるのです。やはり社会的に必要な部分だと私は思っていまして、そういった意味で、今度、武富士の会社更生手続開始の申し立てにより、貸金業法の見直しが直ちに必要になるとは考えていませんけれども、今申し上げましたようなマーケットがあるのは事実でございますし、そういった意味で、今度の改正貸金業法というのは、上限金利もご存じのように引き下げやら、総量規制の導入など、多重債務問題ということが大変大きな問題になりまして、これは全党一致でこの法律ができ上がって、抜本的かつ総合的な対策を講じたわけでございますが、私になって、当庁としては、改正貸金業法フォローアップチームを中心に、貸金業者の動向を含めた改正貸金法の完全施行後の状況をフォローアップしてまいっております。 - 金融庁 - (2) The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to the fee for a petition under the provisions of Article 17, paragraph (1), paragraph (2) or paragraph (5) of the Land and Building Lease Act (Act No. 90 of 1991) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18, paragraph (3) of said Act), Article 18, paragraph (1) of said Act, Article 19, paragraph (1) of said Act (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (7) of said Article) or Article 20, paragraph (1) of said Act (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5) of said Article), filed in cases where a conciliation case is concluded under the provisions of Article 14 of the Civil Conciliation Act (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 15) or where an order in lieu of conciliation ceases to be effective pursuant to the provisions of Article 18, paragraph (2) of said Act, and where said petition is filed with regard to the claim for which conciliation has been sought, within two weeks from the day on which the petitioner of conciliation received notice to that effect.
２ 前項の規定は、民事調停法第十四条（第十五条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により調停事件が終了し、又は同法第十八条第二項の規定により調停に代わる決定が効力を失つた場合において、調停の申立人がその旨の通知を受けた日から二週間以内に調停の目的となつた請求についてする借地借家法（平成三年法律第九十号）第十七条第一項、第二項若しくは第五項（第十八条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）、第十八条第一項、第十九条第一項（同条第七項において準用する場合を含む。）又は第二十条第一項（同条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による申立ての手数料について準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 34 (1) Where the shareholders meeting of a Bank passes a resolution for transferring the whole of its business or for acquiring the whole of the other's business (or, in the case where a Bank acquires the whole of the other's business not through the resolution required by Article 467(1) (Approvals of Assignment of Business) of the Companies Act pursuant to the provision of Article 468 (Cases where Approval of Assignment of Business is not Required) of that Act, where its board of directors passes a resolution for acquiring such business or its executive officers decide to acquire such business), the Bank shall, within two weeks from the day of the resolution or decision, make public notice, in the official gazette, of the gist of the resolution or the decision and to the effect that any creditors who have any objection to the transfer of the whole of its business or acquisition of the whole of the other's business ought to file an objection within a specified period of time, and shall give notice of the same separately to each known creditor other than Depositors, etc. or any other creditors specified by a Cabinet Order, if any.
第三十四条 銀行を当事者とする事業の全部の譲渡又は譲受けについて株主総会の決議（会社法第四百六十八条（事業譲渡等の承認を要しない場合）の規定により同法第四百六十七条第一項（事業譲渡等の承認等）の決議によらずに事業の全部の譲受けを行う場合には、取締役会の決議又は執行役の決定）がされたときは、当該銀行は、当該決議又は決定の日から二週間以内に、当該決議又は決定の要旨及び当該事業の全部の譲渡又は譲受けに異議のある債権者は一定の期間内に異議を述べるべき旨を官報に公告し、かつ、預金者等その他政令で定める債権者以外の知れている債権者には、各別にこれを催告しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 40-2 (1) Where 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received the document referred to in Article 37 (2), he/she may terminate the Multilevel Marketing Contract (if the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor had not rescinded the Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 40 (1) by said time limit due to being misled by the Supervisor's or the solicitor's act, in violation of the provision of Article 34 (1), or the general multilevel marketing distributor' act, in violation of Article 34 (2), of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Supervisor's, the solicitor's, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act of intimidating the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor in violation of the provision of Article 34 (3), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received a document, which has been issued by Supervisor, the solicitor, or the general multilevel marketing distributor pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor may rescind said Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 40 (1)).
第四十条の二 連鎖販売加入者は、第三十七条第二項の書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過した後（連鎖販売加入者が、統括者若しくは勧誘者が第三十四条第一項の規定に違反し若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第二項の規定に違反して前条第一項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は統括者、勧誘者若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が第三十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに前条第一項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該連鎖販売加入者が、その連鎖販売業に係る統括者、勧誘者又は一般連鎖販売業者が同項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による当該連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過した後）においては、将来に向かつてその連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Sec.185 Fair Use of a Copyrighted Work 185.1. The fair use of a copyrighted work for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, research, and similar purposes is not an infringement of copyright. Decompilation, which is understood here to be the reproduction of the code and translation of the forms of the computer program to achieve the inter-operability of an independently created computer program with other programs may also constitute fair use. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use, the factors to be considered shall include: (a) The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for non-profit education purposes; (b) The nature of the copyrighted work; (c) The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (d) The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
第185条 著作権を有する著作物の公正な使用 185.1批評，論評，事件の報道，教室での使用のための複数の複製を含む授業，学問，研究その他類似の目的のための著作権を有する著作物の公正な使用は，著作権の侵害ではない。独立して創作されたコンピュータ・プログラムと他のコンピュータ・プログラムとの間で適時情報交換することができることを達成するためのコンピュータ・プログラムの形式のコード及びトランスレ－ションの複製であると理解されるデコンピレ－ション(decompilation)も，公正な使用である。具体的な事件において公正な使用であるか否かを決定するに当って考慮すべき要因には，次のものを含む。 (a)使用の目的及び特性。使用が商業的性質のものであるか否か又は非営利の教育上の目的の使用であるか否かを含む。 (b)著作権を有する著作物の性質 (c)著作権を有する著作物全体との関連における使用される部分の意義及び実質的価値 (d)著作権を有する著作物の潜在的市場における使用の効果又は同著作物の価値 - 特許庁 - The Government may make such rules as it thinks expedient subject to the provisions of this Act- for regulating the practice of registration under this Act; for classifying goods for the purposes of designs; for making or requiring duplicates of specifications, drawings and other documents; for securing and regulating the publishing and selling of copies, at such prices and in such manner as the Government thinks fit, of specifications, drawings and other documents; for securing and regulating the making, printing, publishing, and selling of indexes to, and abridgements of, specifications and other documents in the Department of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks; and providing for the inspection of indexes and abridgements and other documents; (ee) for the manner in which fees leviable under this Act may be paid; (eee) for ensuring secrecy with respect to patents to which section 21A applies;] generally for regulating the business of the Department of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, the conduct of proceedings before the Registrar, and all things by this Act placed under the direction or control of the Registrar] or of the Government; and generally for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of this Act.
政府は、本法の規定を条件として、政府が目的に適うと考える次の規則を制定することができる。本法に基づく登録業務の管理する規則。意匠の目的による商品の分類する規則。明細書、図面及びその他の書類の副本の作成又は要求する規則。政府が適切と考える価格及び方式で明細書、図面等の書類の謄本の公開及び販売を確保し管理する規則。特許意匠商標庁における明細書及びその他書類の索引及び要約の作成、印刷、発行及び販売を確保し管理する規則。また、索引及び要約等の書類の閲覧に備える規則。本法に基づき賦課できる手数料を支払う方法に係る規則。第21A 条が適用される特許について秘密保持を確保する規則。特許意匠商標庁の業務、登録官による手続きの処理、及び本法により登録官又は政府の指示又は管理下に定められた事柄を一般的に管理する規則。一般的に本法の規定を実施する目的による規則。 - 特許庁 - Article 11 (1) In cases where a Securities Registration Statement contains any fake statements on important matters, when the Prime Minister finds it necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors, he/she may, with regard to said Securities Registration Statement, or other statements submitted under Article 5(1), Shelf Registration Statements submitted under Article 23-3(1) or Shelf Registration Supplements submitted under Article 23-8(1) by the person who submitted said Securities Registration Statement during the period within one year from the day when the person submitted said Securities Registration Statement, order the suspension of effect of the notification or of the Shelf Registration pertaining to the Shelf Registration Statement or the Shelf Registration Supplements, or extend the period stipulated in Article 8(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 23-5(1)), for the period that he/she considers appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors. In this case, a hearing shall be held irrespective of the categories of procedures for hearing statements of opinion under Article 13(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act.
第十一条 内閣総理大臣は、有価証券届出書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載がある場合において、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当であると認めるときは、当該有価証券届出書又はその届出者がこれを提出した日から一年以内に提出する第五条第一項に規定する届出書若しくは第二十三条の三第一項に規定する発行登録書若しくは第二十三条の八第一項に規定する発行登録追補書類について、届出者に対し、公益又は投資者保護のため相当と認められる期間、その届出の効力若しくは当該発行登録書若しくは当該発行登録追補書類に係る発行登録の効力の停止を命じ、又は第八条第一項（第二十三条の五第一項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する期間を延長することができる。この場合においては、行政手続法第十三条第一項の規定による意見陳述のための手続の区分にかかわらず、聴聞を行わなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 112 The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836 to Article 839 inclusive (Order to Provide Security, Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments etc., Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment, Effect of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(d)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the reduction to the Amount of Specified Capital or the Amount of Preferred Capital. In this case, the phrase "a Shareholder, etc." in Article 828(2)(v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members, director, company auditor, liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
第百十二条 会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ニに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定資本金の額又は優先資本金の額の減少の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役、清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (5) Persons who began to use in good faith a trademark that is identical with or confusingly similar to a registered appellation of origin not less than six months prior to the registration date of the appellation of origin, retain the right to use it subsequently for a period fixed by Kazpatent, but not less than seven years beginning from the date of that registration. Where the trademark has not been used or has been used for less than six months prior to the registration date of an appellation of origin, the effect of the trademark shall be terminated prematurely.
(5) 原産地名称登録日から 6月以内に登録された原産地名称と同一または誤認混同するほどに類似する商標を善意で使用を開始した者は、特許庁が定めた期間内において連続してそれを使用する権利を維持するが、登録日から起算して 7年以内とする。商標が使用されていない、または、原産地名称の登録日前 6月以内しか使用されていない場合、商標の有効性は早期終了するものとする。 商標登録証の所有者は、その商標がカザフスタン共和国における登録商標であることを示すために、丸囲みのローマ字の「R」または商標として登録されていることを示す「商標」若しくは「登録商標」という言葉を特別表示として商標に添えて加えて使用することができる。 - 特許庁 - Where a person to whom a decision of the Controller under this section relates does not, within the period of 21 days beginning on the date of the decision, apply to the Court for cancellation of the decision, the Controller may apply ex parte to the Court for confirmation of the decision and, if the Controller so applies, the Court on the hearing of the application shall, unless it sees good reason to the contrary, declare accordingly and either (as the Court may consider proper) direct the Controller to erase the name of such person from the register or direct that during a specified period (beginning not earlier than seven days after the decision of the Court) registration of his name in the register shall not have effect.
本条に基づく長官の決定に関係する者が，その決定日に始まる21日の期間内に当該決定の取消を裁判所に申請しない場合は，長官は，一方的に裁判所に当該決定の確認を申請することができる。また，長官がその旨を申請する場合は，当該申請を審理するに当たり裁判所は，別段の十分な理由を認めない限り，これに従い宣言するものとし，かつ，(裁判所が適切とみなす場合)その者の名称の登録簿からの消去を長官に指示するか又は(裁判所の決定後7日を越える日に始まる)指定期間中，登録簿にある当該人の名称の登録が効力を有さない旨を指示するかの何れかを行う。 - 特許庁 - Article 82 (1) Where a design right with regard to an application for a design registration filed on or before the date of filing of a patent application is in conflict with the patent right with regard to the patent application, a person who, at the time of expiration of the duration of the design right, actually owns the exclusive license on the design right, or a non-exclusive license having effect under Article 99(1) of the Patent Act as applied under Article 28(3) of the Design Act on the design right or on the exclusive license shall, upon expiration of the duration of the design right, have a non-exclusive license on the patent right or on the exclusive license actually existing at the time of expiration of the duration of the design right, limited to the extent of the original right.
第八十二条 特許出願の日前又はこれと同日の意匠登録出願に係る意匠権がその特許出願に係る特許権と抵触する場合において、その意匠権の存続期間が満了したときは、その満了の際現にその意匠権についての専用実施権又はその意匠権若しくは専用実施権についての意匠法第二十八条第三項において準用するこの法律第九十九条第一項の効力を有する通常実施権を有する者は、原権利の範囲内において、当該特許権又はその意匠権の存続期間の満了の際現に存する専用実施権について通常実施権を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 180 The provision of Article 87 (Method of Explanation by Party under Provision of Article 167 of the Code) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the explanation by a party under the provision of Article 167 (Advancement of Allegations and Evidence after Close of Preliminary Oral Arguments) of the Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 298 (Effect of Procedural Act Performed in First Instance, etc.) of the Code, and the provision of Article 94 (Method of Explanation by Party under Provision of Article 178 of the Code) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the explanation by a party under the provision of Article 178 (Advancement of Allegations and Evidence after Close of Preparatory Proceedings by Means of Documents) of the Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 298 of the Code.
第百八十条 第八十七条（法第百六十七条の規定による当事者の説明の方式）の規定は、法第二百九十八条（第一審の訴訟行為の効力等）第二項において準用する法第百六十七条（準備的口頭弁論終了後の攻撃防御方法の提出）の規定による当事者の説明について、第九十四条（法第百七十八条の規定による当事者の説明の方式）の規定は、法第二百九十八条第二項において準用する法第百七十八条（書面による準備手続終結後の攻撃防御方法の提出）の規定による当事者の説明について準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (1) If a Partner who is a natural person dies, his/her heir may succeed to such Partner after providing the General Partner with a notice to the effect that such heir succeeds to such Partner’s status as a Partner within [three] months from death, together with materials as separately requested by the General Partner; provided, however, that if the General Partner reasonably determines that the heir falls under any category of Antisocial Forces or the General Partner would, by admitting the heir as a Partner, cease to satisfy the requirements prescribed in Article 63(1) of the FIEA, the General Partner may refuse the heir’s succession of such Partner’s status of a Partner.
1. 自然人である組合員が死亡し、その相続人が、無限責任組合員に対し、死亡後［3］ヶ月以内に無限責任組合員が別途要請する資料とともに被相続人の組合員たる地位を承継する旨を通知した場合、相続人は当該組合員の地位を承継することができる。但し、当該相続人が反社会的勢力に該当すると無限責任組合員が合理的に判断した場合又は当該相続人を組合員として認めることにより無限責任組合員が金融商品取引法第63 条第1 項に規定する要件を充足しないこととなる場合には、無限責任組合員は当該相続人による組合員の地位の承継を拒むことができる。 - 経済産業省 - The application shall furthermore indicate: a request for priority under section 16 of the Designs Act and information in pursuance of sections 5 and 7 if the applicant claims priority, the name or company name of an agent and the agent's mailing address, if the applicant is represented by an agent, together with a power of attorney except where a power of attorney is unnecessary because the agent is a solicitor or a trademark or patent agent entitled to represent the applicant in relation to the Patent and Trademark Office, the name of the designer, including the design group or company, and the designer's mailing address, if a request is being made for registration of one or more designers in the design register, cf. section 13of the Designs Act, information as to who shall be authorized to receive notification from the Patent and Trademark Office on behalf of all applicants, if design registration is applied for by several persons acting jointly and they are not represented by an agent, a statement of the period for which publication of registration should be deferred, if the applicant requests deferment under section 18, last sentence, of the Designs Act, a statement to the effect that the design shall be registered in color if protection is to include the design in color.
出願には更に，次に掲げる事項を表示しなければならない。出願人が優先権を主張する場合は，意匠法第16条の規定に基づく優先権の請求並びに本規則第5条及び第7条の規定による情報，出願人が代理人によって代理されている場合は，代理人の名称又は会社名及び代理人の郵便宛先，並びに委任状。ただし，委任状については，代理人が特許商標庁に対して，出願人を代表する権限を有する弁護士(solicitor)又は商標代理人若しくは特許代理人であるという理由により，委任状が不要である場合を除く。1又は2以上のデザイナー(訳注：創作者と思われる)を意匠登録簿に登録することを請求する場合は(意匠法第13条(4)参照)，デザイナー(デザイン・グループ又はデザイン会社を含む。)の名称及びデザイナーの郵便宛先，意匠登録が，共同で行動する複数の者によって出願され，それらの者が1の代理人によって代理されていない場合は，特許商標庁からの通知を出願人全員を代表して受領する権限を付与されている者についての情報，出願人が，意匠法第18条最終文の規定に基づく延期を請求する場合は，登録に関する公告の延期を求める期間についての陳述，保護の対象が色彩付の意匠である場合は，その意匠が色彩付で登録されるべき旨の陳述。 - 特許庁 - (2) Concerning the patent fee, registration fee or other charge to be paid with respect to Patent Rights, etc. or the Rights to Receive Patent, etc. or the Patent Rights, etc. obtained based on the Right to Receive Patent, etc., these rights being owned by a Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency (hereinafter referred to simply as "Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency") and pertaining to research results related to technologies of said Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency and having been assigned, prior to the date of partial enforcement, to a person who has received an accreditation pursuant to paragraph 1 of Article 13 of the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act (limited to persons who conduct the operation of transferring research results related to technologies of Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agencies prescribed in the same paragraph to private business operators who intend to utilize these research results; in the next paragraph referred to as "Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency-Related Certified Business Operators "), the provisions of paragraph 2 and paragraph 3 in the same Article, the provisions of paragraph 4, paragraph 6 and paragraph 8 of Article 12 in the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act that apply mutatis mutandis to paragraph 2 of same Article, the provisions of paragraph 10 of Article 12 of the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act that apply mutatis mutandis to paragraph 3 of Article 13 of the Old Universities, etc. Technology Transfer Promotion Act, and paragraph 4, paragraph 6 and paragraph 8 of the same Article that apply mutatis mutandis to same paragraph shall remain in effect, even after the partial effective date.
２ 旧大学等技術移転促進法第十三条第一項の認定を受けた者（同項に規定する試験研究独立行政法人（以下単に「試験研究独立行政法人」という。）における技術に関する研究成果についてその活用を行おうとする民間事業者に対し移転する事業を行う者に限る。次項において「試験研究独立行政法人関係認定事業者」という。）が一部施行日前に譲渡を受けた試験研究独立行政法人における技術に関する研究成果に係る当該試験研究独立行政法人が保有する特許権等若しくは特許を受ける権利等又はその特許を受ける権利等に基づいて取得した特許権等について納付すべき特許料若しくは登録料又は手数料については、同条第二項及び第三項の規定、同条第二項において準用する旧大学等技術移転促進法第十二条第四項、第六項及び第八項の規定並びに旧大学等技術移転促進法第十三条第三項において準用する旧大学等技術移転促進法第十二条第十項並びに同項において準用する同条第四項、第六項及び第八項の規定は、一部施行日後においても、なおその効力を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 1 This Act shall come into effect as from the date to be specified by a Cabinet Order within a period not exceeding six months from the day of promulgation; provided, however, that the provision revising Article 285-4, Article 285-5, paragraph (2), Article 285-6, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 290, paragraph (1) and Article 293-5, paragraph (3) of the Commercial Code in Article 1, and the provision revising Article 23, paragraph (3) and Article 24, paragraph (1) of the Norinchukin Bank Act (Act No. 42 of 1923) in Article 6 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 39-3, paragraph (3) and Article 40-2, paragraph (1) of the Shoko Chukin Bank Act (Act No. 14 of 1936) in Article 7 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 52, paragraph (1) of the Agricultural Cooperative Association Act (Act No. 132 of 1947) in Article 9 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 53, paragraph (3) of the Securities and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948) and deleting paragraph (4) of that Article in Article 10 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 56, paragraph (1) of the Fisheries Cooperative Association Act (Act No. 242 of 1948) in Article 11 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision adding an Article after Article 5-5 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative (Act No. 183 of 1949) and revising Article 12, paragraph (1) of that Act in Article 12 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 42, paragraph (1) of the Shipowners Mutual Insurance Association Act (Act No. 177 of 1950) in Article 13 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 55-3, paragraph (3) and Article 57, paragraph (1) of the Shinkin Bank Act (Act No. 238 of 1951) in Article 16 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 61, paragraph (1) of the Labor Bank Act (Act No. 227 of 1953) in Article 18 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 17-2, paragraph (3) of the Banking Act (Act No. 59 of 1981) and deleting paragraph (4) of that Article in Article 23 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision of Article 26 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision adding a paragraph to Article 15 of the Insurance Business Act (Act No. 105 of 1995), revising Article 55, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 102, paragraph (1) and Article 112-2, paragraph (3) of that Act, deleting Article 112-2, paragraph (4) of that Act, revising Article 115, paragraph (2), Article 118, paragraph (1), Article 119 and Article 199 of that Act and deleting Article 59, paragraph (2) and Article 90, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions to that Act in Article 27 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provision revising Article 7, paragraph (2) of the Act on Special Measures for the Commercial Code on the Procedure of Cancellation of Shares (Act No. 55 of 1997) in Article 29 of the Supplementary Provisions and the provision revising Article 101, paragraph (1) and Article 102, paragraph (3) of the Act on the Liquidation of Specified Assets by Special Purpose Companies (Act No. 105 of 1998) in Article 31 of the Supplementary Provisions shall come into effect as from 1 April 2000.
第一条 この法律は、公布の日から起算して六月を超えない範囲内において政令で定める日から施行する。ただし、第一条中商法第二百八十五条ノ四、第二百八十五条ノ五第二項、第二百八十五条ノ六第二項及び第三項、第二百九十条第一項並びに第二百九十三条ノ五第三項の改正規定並びに附則第六条中農林中央金庫法（大正十二年法律第四十二号）第二十三条第三項及び第二十四条第一項の改正規定、附則第七条中商工組合中央金庫法（昭和十一年法律第十四号）第三十九条ノ三第三項及び第四十条ノ二第一項の改正規定、附則第九条中農業協同組合法（昭和二十二年法律第百三十二号）第五十二条第一項の改正規定、附則第十条中証券取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）第五十三条第三項の改正規定及び同条第四項を削る改正規定、附則第十一条中水産業協同組合法（昭和二十三年法律第二百四十二号）第五十六条第一項の改正規定、附則第十二条中協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（昭和二十四年法律第百八十三号）第五条の五の次に一条を加える改正規定及び同法第十二条第一項の改正規定、附則第十三条中船主相互保険組合法（昭和二十五年法律第百七十七号）第四十二条第一項の改正規定、附則第十六条中信用金庫法（昭和二十六年法律第二百三十八号）第五十五条の三第三項及び第五十七条第一項の改正規定、附則第十八条中労働金庫法（昭和二十八年法律第二百二十七号）第六十一条第一項の改正規定、附則第二十三条中銀行法（昭和五十六年法律第五十九号）第十七条の二第三項の改正規定及び同条第四項を削る改正規定、附則第二十六条の規定、附則第二十七条中保険業法（平成七年法律第百五号）第十五条に一項を加える改正規定、同法第五十五条第一項及び第二項、第百十二条第一項並びに第百十二条の二第三項の改正規定、同条第四項を削る改正規定、同法第百十五条第二項、第百十八条第一項、第百十九条及び第百九十九条の改正規定並びに同法附則第五十九条第二項及び附則第九十条第二項を削る改正規定、附則第二十九条中株式の消却の手続に関する商法の特例に関する法律（平成九年法律第五十五号）第七条第二項の改正規定並びに附則第三十一条中特定目的会社による特定資産の流動化に関する法律（平成十年法律第百五号）第百一条第一項及び第百二条第三項の改正規定は、平成十二年四月一日から施行する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - The Tokyo High Court judgment dated February 24, 1999, a major judicial precedent ("King Crimson Case") states that, where a name or image of a celebrity is utilized in speech or publication, "the introduction etc. of a celebrity unavoidably brings with it his/her power to attract customers. Since it is impossible to introduce him/her free of influence of his/her power to attract customers' attention. Therefore, a person is regarded as utilizing a celebrity's power to attract customer only if the sole purpose and effect of such utilization is solely focused on the procurement of the economic benefit or value derived from his/her power to attract customers. If such person simply introduces a celebrity or does something similar thereto, aware of his/her power to attract customers, such person shall not be considered as having utilized such power." This judgment held that such person shall not be regarded as having infringed the publicity rights except in cases such person "solely" utilized the celebrity's power to attract customers.
その代表的な裁判例である東京高裁平成１１年２月２４日判決（以下「キングクリムゾン高裁判決」という。）は、言論、出版において、著名人の氏名・肖像が利用される場合に、「著名人の紹介等は必然的に当該著名人の顧客吸引力を反映することになり、紹介等から右顧客吸引力の影響を遮断することはできないから、著名人の顧客吸引力を利用する行為であるというためには、右行為が専ら著名人の顧客吸引力に着目しその経済的利益ないし価値を利用するものであることが必要であり、単に著名人の顧客吸引力を承知の上で紹介等をしたというだけでは当該著名人の顧客吸引力を利用したということはできない」として、「専ら」顧客吸引力の価値を利用したといえない場合には、パブリシティ権侵害を否定する立場に立っている。 - 経済産業省 - 7. When the inventor opposes the disclosure of his identity, he must have the patent applicant or his representative as an intermediary, and before the date on which the file of the patent application is made available to the public, send to the Service a demonstration of will, expressed and written to that effect. This document of non-mention, dated and signed by the inventor, must be accompanied with the following documents: (a) the corresponding designation of the inventor, dated and signed by the owner of the patent application or by his representative, except when this designation is already in the possession of the Service, or, if need be, the judicial decision concerning the designation; (b) the proof of payment of the regularization fee, except when the document of non-mention and the corresponding designation are attached to the original documents filed with the patent application.
(7) 発明者が自己の身元の開示に反対の場合は，その者は，特許出願人又はその者の代理人を仲介者として，特許出願のファイルが公衆の閲覧に供せられる前に，その旨記述した意思表示書を庁宛に送達しなければならない。この不記載を求める書類には，日付入りで発明者によって署名の上，次の書類を添付しなければならない。 (a) 庁がこの指定書を既に所持している場合を除いて，日付入りで特許出願人又はその者の代理人によって署名された，発明者に対応する指定書，又は該当する場合は指定に関する判決書 (b) 不記載を求める書類及び対応する指定書が特許出願と共に提出された原書類に添付されている場合を除いて，補正手数料の納付証 - 特許庁 - (3) When the Prime Minister has decided to grant or refuse registration under Article 29 or Article 33-2, authorization under Article 30(1) or Article 31(6), registration of change under Article 31(4), approval under Article 35 (4), or approval under paragraph (3) or (4) of the preceding Article, attach conditions under the provisions of Article 30-2(1), or make disposition based on the provisions of Article 51, Article 51-2, Article 52(1) or (2), Article 52-2(1) or (2), Article 53, Article 54, Article 56-3, or paragraph (2) of the preceding Article, he/she shall notify to that effect in writing to the applicant or the Financial Instruments Business Operator.
３ 内閣総理大臣は、第二十九条若しくは第三十三条の二の登録、第三十条第一項若しくは第三十一条第六項の認可、第三十一条第四項の変更登録、第三十五条第四項の承認若しくは前条第三項若しくは第四項の承認をし、若しくはしないこととしたとき、第三十条の二第一項の規定により条件を付することとしたとき、又は第五十一条、第五十一条の二、第五十二条第一項若しくは第二項、第五十二条の二第一項若しくは第二項、第五十三条、第五十四条、第五十六条の三若しくは前条第二項の規定に基づいて処分をすることとしたときは、書面により、その旨を登録申請者又は金融商品取引業者等に通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 11-4 (1) A person who intends, without changing the position, structure or equipment of a manufacturing facility, storage facility or handling facility, to change the name, quantity or multiple of the designated quantity of the hazardous materials stored or handled at the manufacturing facility, storage facility or handling facility (the multiple of the designated quantity means the value obtained by dividing the quantity of the hazardous materials stored or handled at the manufacturing facility, storage facility or handling facility by the designated quantity of said hazardous materials (in cases when storing or handling two or more types of hazardous materials which are categorized by different names of materials or for which different designated quantities are designated, the sum of the values obtained by dividing the quantities of these types of hazardous materials stored or handled by the designated quantities of the respective types of hazardous materials)), shall notify the municipal mayor, etc. to that effect no later than ten days prior to the day on which the change is scheduled.
第十一条の四 製造所、貯蔵所又は取扱所の位置、構造又は設備を変更しないで、当該製造所、貯蔵所又は取扱所において貯蔵し、又は取り扱う危険物の品名、数量又は指定数量の倍数（当該製造所、貯蔵所又は取扱所において貯蔵し、又は取り扱う危険物の数量を当該危険物の指定数量で除して得た値（品名又は指定数量を異にする二以上の危険物を貯蔵し、又は取り扱う場合には、当該貯蔵又は取扱いに係るそれぞれの危険物の数量を当該危険物の指定数量で除して得た値の和）をいう。）を変更しようとする者は、変更しようとする日の十日前までに、その旨を市町村長等に届け出なければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 32 (1) Where part of a design right that pertains to designs similar to the registered design with regard to an application for a design registration filed on or before the date of filing of a design application is in conflict with the design right with regard to the design application, a person who, at the time of expiration of the duration of the design right, actually owns the exclusive license on the expired design right, or a non-exclusive license having effect under Article 99(1) of the Patent Act as applied under Article 28(3) of the design Act on the design right or on the exclusive license shall, upon expiration of the duration of the design right, have a non-exclusive license on the design right or on the exclusive license actually existing at the time of expiration of the duration of the design right, limited to the extent of the original right.
第三十二条 意匠登録出願の日前又はこれと同日の意匠登録出願に係る意匠権のうち登録意匠に類似する意匠に係る部分がその意匠登録出願に係る意匠権と抵触する場合において、その意匠権の存続期間が満了したときは、その満了の際現にその存続期間が満了した意匠権についての専用実施権又はその意匠権若しくは専用実施権についての第二十八条第三項において準用する特許法第九十九条第一項の効力を有する通常実施権を有する者は、原権利の範囲内において、当該意匠権又はその意匠権の存続期間の満了の際現に存する専用実施権について通常実施権を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) Where a person who engages in the business of manufacturing or importing a chemical substance subject to monitoring or a class II specified chemical substance has knowledge of the composition, properties, etc. of the chemical substance subject to monitoring or the class II specified chemical substance that he/she has manufactured or imported as specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (the knowledge is limited to that which is not publicly known, and excluding that which is to be reported pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 5-4, paragraph (1) of Article 24, paragraph (1) of Article 25-3 or paragraph (1) of this Article), he/she shall endeavor to report to that effect and the details of said knowledge to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment.
３ 監視化学物質又は第二種特定化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者は、その製造し、又は輸入した監視化学物質又は第二種特定化学物質について、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める組成、性状等に関する知見（公然と知られていないものに限り、第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項、第二十五条の三第一項又は第一項の規定により報告すべきものを除く。）を有しているときは、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、その旨及び当該知見の内容を厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣に報告するよう努めなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (x) acts of assigning, delivering, displaying for the purpose of assignment or delivery, exporting or importing (a) devices (including machines incorporating such devices) having the sole function of enabling the viewing of images or hearing of sounds, the running of programs, or the recording of images, sounds or programs which are restricted by technological restriction measures that are used in business (excluding technological restriction measures used to restrict all but specific persons from viewing images or hearing sounds, running programs, or recording images, sounds or programs), by obstructing the effect of such technological restriction measures, or (b) data storage media or machines on which programs having only such function (including other types of programs combined with such programs) have been recorded, or acts of providing programs having only such function through an electric telecommunication line;
十 営業上用いられている技術的制限手段（他人が特定の者以外の者に影像若しくは音の視聴若しくはプログラムの実行又は影像、音若しくはプログラムの記録をさせないために用いているものを除く。）により制限されている影像若しくは音の視聴若しくはプログラムの実行又は影像、音若しくはプログラムの記録を当該技術的制限手段の効果を妨げることにより可能とする機能のみを有する装置（当該装置を組み込んだ機器を含む。）若しくは当該機能のみを有するプログラム（当該プログラムが他のプログラムと組み合わされたものを含む。）を記録した記録媒体若しくは記憶した機器を譲渡し、引き渡し、譲渡若しくは引渡しのために展示し、輸出し、若しくは輸入し、又は当該機能のみを有するプログラムを電気通信回線を通じて提供する行為 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - to refuse an application that does not meet the minimum filing requirements under subsection 24(2); or to make or refuse to make a determination under section 29; or to refuse an application under section 30 for a design application to proceed in the person's name; or to refuse to register a design under section 43; or to refuse to publish a design under section 59; or to prohibit or restrict the publication of information about the subject matter of a design application under section 108; or to refuse an application under section 137 for an extension of time. If a decision mentioned in subsection (2) is made and a written notice of the decision is given to a person whose interests are affected by the decision, the notice must include a statement to the effect that an application may be made to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal under the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 for review of the decision.
第24条(2)に基づいて最低出願要件を満たさない出願を拒絶すること，又は第29条に基づいて決定を行うこと又は行うことを拒絶すること，又は第30条に基づいて意匠出願をその者の名義で進める申請を拒絶すること，又は第43条に基づいて意匠の登録を拒絶すること，又は第59条に基づいて意匠の公告を拒絶すること，又は第108条に基づいて意匠出願の対象となる事項について情報の公表を禁止し又は制限すること，又は第137条に基づいて期間延長の申請を拒絶すること，又は(1)に記載した決定がなされ，その決定によって自己の利害に影響を受ける者に対して，その決定について書面による通知を送付するときは，その通知には，当該決定についての再審理を求める申請を，1975年行政不服審判所法に基づいて行政不服審判所に対してすることができる旨の陳述を記載しなければならない。 - 特許庁 - Article 13 (1) Concerning research results related to technologies of an incorporated administrative agency (referring to an Incorporated Administrative Agency as stipulated in Article 2, paragraph 1 of the Act on General Rules for Incorporated Administrative Agencies) (Act No.103 of 1999) that is an entity conducting work related to testing and research (hereinafter referred to as a "Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency"), a person who has received assignment of patent right or the right to receive a patent related to said research result owned by a Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency, and who is engaged in the operation of transferring said research results (hereinafter "Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency Technology Transfer Operations") to private business operators who intend to utilize those research results, through assignment, establishment of exclusive licenses of patent rights obtained based on said patent right itself or right to receive said patent or otherwise, may apply to the Minister having jurisdiction over said Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agencies and receive an accreditation to the effect that the operation of that person conforms to all of the following items.
第十三条 独立行政法人（独立行政法人通則法（平成十一年法律第百三号）第二条第一項に規定する独立行政法人をいう。）であって試験研究に関する業務を行うものとして政令で定めるもの（以下「試験研究独立行政法人」という。）における技術に関する研究成果について、当該研究成果に係る試験研究独立行政法人が保有する特許権又は特許を受ける権利の譲渡を受け、当該特許権又は当該特許を受ける権利に基づいて取得した特許権についての譲渡、専用実施権の設定その他の行為により、当該研究成果の活用を行おうとする民間事業者に対し移転する事業（以下「試験研究独立行政法人技術移転事業」という。）を行う者は、当該試験研究独立行政法人を所管する大臣に申請して、その事業が次の各号のいずれにも適合している旨の認定を受けることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 16 Articles 668 (joint ownership of partnership assets), 669 (responsibility of persons delaying in making cash contribution), 671 though 674 (mutatis mutandis application of provisions for entrustment, resignation or removal of an executor of business, partners' right of inspection of the state of business and assets and proportion in respect of distribution of profits and losses to partners), 676 (restriction on disposal of equity interest by partners and prohibition of split of partnership assets), 677 (prohibition of set-off by debtors to the partnership), 680 (expulsion), 681 (return of equity interest to withdrawing partners), 683 (request for dissolution by partners), 684 (non-retroactiveness of effect of termination), 687 (resignation or removal of partner liquidators) and 688 (authority of liquidators and method of distribution of remaining assets) of the Civil Code (Act No. 89 of 1896) shall apply mutatis mutandis with respect to a Partnership.
第十六条 組合については、民法（明治二十九年法律第八十九号）第六百六十八条（組合財産の共有）、第六百六十九条（金銭出資遅滞者の責任）、第六百七十一条から第六百七十四条まで（委任の規定の準用、業務執行者の辞任又は解任、組合員の業務及び財産の状況の検査権並びに組合員の損益分配の割合）、第六百七十六条（組合員の持分処分の制限及び組合財産分割の禁止）、第六百七十七条（組合債務者の相殺の禁止）、第六百八十条（除名）、第六百八十一条（脱退組合員の持分の払戻し）、第六百八十三条（組合員の解散請求）、第六百八十四条（解除の効力の不そ及）、第六百八十七条（組合員である清算人の辞任又は解任）及び第六百八十八条（清算人の職務権限及び残余財産の分割方法）の規定を準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 5 (1) When a person who has already established a large-scale retail store, at the time of the enforcement of this Act, intends to change the matters listed in Article 5, paragraph (1), item (iv) to item (vi), with regard to said large-scale retail store, for the first time on or after the date of the enforcement of this Act (with regard to a large-scale retail store whose total store floor area comes to exceed the total as on the date of the enforcement of this Act as a result of the commencement of business or the increase of the store floor area pertaining to a notification under the provision of Article 5, paragraph (1) or Article 6, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of the Former Act, by the day on which eight months have elapsed from the date of the enforcement of this Act, for the first time on or after the date of the commencement of business or the increase of the store floor area), such person shall notify the prefecture to that effect and regarding any matters listed in Article 5, paragraph (1), item (i), item (ii), or item (iv) to item (vi) that are other than those pertaining to said change.
第五条 この法律の施行の際現に大規模小売店舗を設置している者は、当該大規模小売店舗について第五条第一項第四号から第六号までに掲げる事項の変更であってこの法律の施行の日以後最初に行われるもの（この法律の施行の日から八月を経過する日までの間に、旧法第五条第一項又は第六条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による届出に係る営業の開始又は店舗面積の増加をすることにより店舗面積の合計がこの法律の施行の日における店舗面積の合計を超えることとなる大規模小売店舗については、その営業の開始又は店舗面積の増加の日以後最初に行われるもの）をしようとするときは、その旨及び第五条第一項第一号、第二号又は第四号から第六号までに掲げる事項で当該変更に係るもの以外のものを都道府県に届け出なければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 27-26 (1) A Report of Possession of Large Volume pertaining to Share Certificates, etc. which are held by a Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to those who conduct the Type I Financial Instruments Business under Article 28(1), or who conduct the Investment Management Business under paragraph (4) of the same Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), a bank or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (limited to those who have notified the Reference Date specified in paragraph (3) to the Prime Minister) where the purpose of holding is not for effecting material changes in or giving material effect to the business activities of the issuer of said Share Certificates, etc., as specified by a Cabinet Order (referred to as "Act of Making Important Suggestion, etc." in paragraphs (4) and (5)) (excluding the cases where the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. exceeds the ratio specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, or other cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner of holding and other circumstances), or which are held by the State, local government or other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (limited to those who have notified the Reference Date specified in paragraph (3) to the Prime Minister) (such Share Certificates, etc. are hereinafter collectively referred to as "Share Certificates, etc. Subject to Special Provisions" in this Article) shall, notwithstanding the provision of the main clause of Article 27-23(1), be submitted to the Prime Minister with a statement of the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance with regard to the status of holding of said Share Certificates, etc. as of the Reference Date when the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. have exceeded 5% for the first time, within five days from said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance.
第二十七条の二十六 金融商品取引業者（第二十八条第一項に規定する第一種金融商品取引業を行う者又は同条第四項に規定する投資運用業を行う者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）、銀行その他の内閣府令で定める者（第三項に規定する基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者に限る。）が保有する株券等で当該株券等の発行者の事業活動に重大な変更を加え、又は重大な影響を及ぼす行為として政令で定めるもの（第四項及び第五項において「重要提案行為等」という。）を行うことを保有の目的としないもの（株券等保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合を除く。）又は国、地方公共団体その他の内閣府令で定める者（第三項に規定する基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者に限る。）が保有する株券等（以下この条において「特例対象株券等」という。）に係る大量保有報告書は、第二十七条の二十三第一項本文の規定にかかわらず、株券等保有割合が初めて百分の五を超えることとなつた基準日における当該株券等の保有状況に関する事項で内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日から五日以内に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 58 (1) Where a person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales concludes a Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pertaining to the Business Opportunity Related Sales, the counterparty of the contract (limited to an individual who conducts business made available or mediated in relation to such Business Opportunity Related Sales at a place other than a Business Establishment, etc.; hereinafter referred to as the "Counterparty" in this article to Article 58-3) may rescind such Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 55 (2) (if the Counterparty had not rescinded the Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by an act of the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 52 (1), information concerning rescission of a Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by an act of the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales of intimidating the Counterparty in violation of the provision of Article 52 (2), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the Counterparty received a document, which has been issued by the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the Counterparty may rescind said Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of the Business Opportunity Related Sales Contract.
第五十八条 業務提供誘引販売業を行う者がその業務提供誘引販売業に係る業務提供誘引販売契約を締結した場合におけるその業務提供誘引販売契約の相手方（その業務提供誘引販売業に関して提供され、又はあつせんされる業務を事業所等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この条から第五十八条の三までにおいて「相手方」という。）は、第五十五条第二項の書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき（相手方が、業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が第五十二条第一項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による業務提供誘引販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が同条第二項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、相手方が、当該業務提供誘引販売業を行う者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき）を除き、書面によりその業務提供誘引販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その業務提供誘引販売業を行う者は、その業務提供誘引販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) Where a seller concludes a Specified Right Sales Contract, the purchaser of the rights to receive offer of the Specified Continuous Services may terminate the Specified Right Sales Contract when eight days have passed from the date on which he/she received the document referred to in Article 42 (3) (if the purchaser of the rights to receive offer of the Specified Continuous Services had not rescinded the Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of Article 48 (1) by said time limit due to being misled by the seller's act of misrepresenting, in violation of the provision of Article 44 (1), information concerning the rescission of the Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of Paragraph 1 of this article, or due to being disturbed by the seller's act of intimidating the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services in violation of the provision of Article 44 (3), it shall be when eight days have passed from the date on which the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services received a document, which has been issued by the Service Provider pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry referred to in the same paragraph and contains a notice to the effect that the purchaser of the rights to receive offers of the Specified Continuous Services may rescind said Specified Right Sales Contract pursuant to the provision of the same paragraph).
３ 販売業者が特定権利販売契約を締結した場合におけるその特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者は、第四十二条第三項の書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後（その特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者が、販売業者が第四十四条第一項の規定に違反して前条第一項の規定による特定権利販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は販売業者が第四十四条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでに前条第一項の規定による特定権利販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該特定継続的役務の提供を受ける権利の購入者が、当該販売業者が同項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による当該特定権利販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して八日を経過した後）においては、その特定権利販売契約の解除を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Where the examiner intends to give a notice of reasons for refusal for a patent application under the preceding Article, and these reasons for refusal are the same as the reasons for refusal stated in the previous notice under the preceding Article (including its application mutatis mutandis under Article 159(2) (including its application mutatis mutandis under Article 174(1)) and Article 163 (2)) with regard to another patent application (limited to the case where both patent applications are deemed to have been filed simultaneously by applying the provision of Article 44(2) to either or both of them) (excluding such a notice of reasons for refusal of which the applicant of the patent application could have never known the content prior to the filing of a request for examination of the patent application), the examiner shall also give a notice to that effect.
審査官は、前条の規定により特許出願について拒絶の理由を通知しようとする場合において、当該拒絶の理由が、他の特許出願(当該特許出願と当該他の特許出願の少なくともいずれか一方に第四十四条第二項の規定が適用されたことにより当該特許出願と同時にされたこととなつているものに限る。)についての前条(第百五十九条第二項(第百七十四条第一項において準用する場合を含む。)及び第百六十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による通知(当該特許出願についての出願審査の請求前に当該特許出願の出願人がその内容を知り得る状態になかつたものを除く。)に係る拒絶の理由と同一であるときは、その旨を併せて通知しなければならない。 - 特許庁 - A request for a decision by the Patent Authority on the entire or partial termination of a patent under section 96 of the Patents Act shall be filed with the Patent and Trademark Office and shall include: (i) the name or firm name and postal address of the person making the request for termination of the patent, (ii) the registration number of the patent which shall cease to have effect as well as the name of the proprietor of the patent and the title of the invention, (iii) the number of the Community patent or European patent for Denmark which is considered to cover the same invention as the patent, (iv) if the person making the request for termination of a patent is represented by an agent, the name or firm name and postal address of the agent, and (v) if licensees are entered in the Register of Patents, documentation to prove that such licensees have been notified that termination of the patent has been requested.
特許の全部又は一部の終了について特許当局の決定を求める特許法第96条に基づく請求は，特許商標庁に提出するものとし，請求書には次の事項を含めなければならない。 (i) 特許終了を請求する者の名称又は企業名及び郵便宛先 (ii) 失効させる特許の登録番号並びに特許所有者の名称及び発明の名称 (iii) 終了を求める特許と同一の発明を対象としているとみなされる共同体特許又はデンマークについての欧州特許の番号 (iv) 特許終了を請求する者が代理人を選任している場合は，代理人の名称又は事務所名及び郵便宛先，及び (v) 実施権者が特許登録簿に登録されている場合は，特許終了の請求がなされていることを当該実施権者に通知している旨を証明する書類 - 特許庁 - Where a person, by means of circulars, advertisements or otherwise, threatens a person with an action or proceeding for infringement of a trade mark which is registered, or alleged by the first mentioned person to be registered, or with some other like proceeding, a person aggrieved may, whether the person making the threats is or is not the registered proprietor or the registered user of the trade mark, bring a suit against the first mentioned person and may obtain a declaration to the effect that the threats are unjustifiable, and an injunction against the continuance of the threats and may recover such damages (if any) as he has sustained, unless the first mentioned person satisfies the court that the trade mark is registered and that the acts in respect of which the proceedings were threatened, constitute, or, if done, would constitute, an infringement of the trade mark.
何人かが，登録商標又はその者が登録されるべきと主張する商標について，回状，広告又はその他の方法により，侵害訴訟若しくは手続又はそれと同様の他の手続を取ると他人を脅迫したときは，被害者は，脅迫者がその商標の登録所有者又は登録使用者であるか否かを問わず，これに対して訴訟を提起し，脅迫が不当なものである旨の宣告及びその脅迫の続行に対する差止命令を得ることができ，かつ，その者が受けた(若しある場合)損害を回収することができる。ただし，最初に述べた者が，当該商標は登録を受けたものであること，及び訴訟をすると脅迫した行為の対象は商標侵害を構成しており，又はその行為がされるときは商標侵害を構成する筈であることを裁判所に納得させた場合は，この限りでない。 - 特許庁 - Article 50-2 Where the examiner intends to give a notice of reasons for refusal for a patent application under the preceding Article, and these reasons for refusal are the same as the reasons for refusal stated in the previous notice under the preceding Article (including its application mutatis mutandis under Article 159(2) (including its application mutatis mutandis under Article 174(1)) and Article 163(2)) with regard to another patent application (limited to the case where both patent applications are deemed to have been filed simultaneously by applying the provision of Article 44(2) to either or both of them) (excluding such a notice of reasons for refusal of which the applicant of the patent application could have never known the content prior to the filing of a request for examination of the patent application), the examiner shall also give a notice to that effect.
第五十条の二 審査官は、前条の規定により特許出願について拒絶の理由を通知しようとする場合において、当該拒絶の理由が、他の特許出願（当該特許出願と当該他の特許出願の少なくともいずれか一方に第四十四条第二項の規定が適用されたことにより当該特許出願と同時にされたこととなつているものに限る。）についての前条（第百五十九条第二項（第百七十四条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）及び第百六十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による通知（当該特許出願についての出願審査の請求前に当該特許出願の出願人がその内容を知り得る状態になかつたものを除く。）に係る拒絶の理由と同一であるときは、その旨を併せて通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (xi) acts of assigning, delivering, displaying for the purpose of assignment or delivery, exporting or importing to all but specific persons (a) devices (including machines incorporating such devices) having the sole function of enabling the viewing of images or hearing of sounds, the running of programs, or the recording of images, sounds or programs which are restricted by technological restriction measures that are used in business to restrict all but said specific persons from viewing images or hearing sounds, running programs, or recording images, sounds or programs, by obstructing the effect of such technological restriction measures, or (b) data storage media or machines on which programs having only such function (including other types of programs combined with such programs) have been recorded, or the act of providing programs having only such function through an electric telecommunication line;
十一 他人が特定の者以外の者に影像若しくは音の視聴若しくはプログラムの実行又は影像、音若しくはプログラムの記録をさせないために営業上用いている技術的制限手段により制限されている影像若しくは音の視聴若しくはプログラムの実行又は影像、音若しくはプログラムの記録を当該技術的制限手段の効果を妨げることにより可能とする機能のみを有する装置（当該装置を組み込んだ機器を含む。）若しくは当該機能のみを有するプログラム（当該プログラムが他のプログラムと組み合わされたものを含む。）を記録した記録媒体若しくは記憶した機器を当該特定の者以外の者に譲渡し、引き渡し、譲渡若しくは引渡しのために展示し、輸出し、若しくは輸入し、又は当該機能のみを有するプログラムを電気通信回線を通じて提供する行為 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 65 In any of the following cases, the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or the members who are to perform the duties of the accounting advisors, auditor, manager or liquidator of the Bank (including a company that had been said Bank in the case where the license from the Prime Minister set forth in Article 4, paragraph (1) lost its effect as a result of the Bank falling under any of Article 41, items (i) to (iii) inclusive), the representative person, agent or manager of the Foreign Bank, the Major Holder of Voting Rights in the Bank (including a person who had been a Major Holder of Voting Rights in the Bank in the case where the Major Holder of Voting Rights in the Bank became a person who is no longer a Major Holder of Voting Rights in the Bank and, when the Major Holder of Voting Rights in the Bank is a Juridical Person, etc. (meaning any juridical person and any organization without juridical personality specified in Article 3-2, paragraph (1), item (i); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), it shall be the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or the members who are to perform the duties of the accounting advisors, auditor, representative person, administrator, manager, member who executes the operation, or liquidator of said Juridical Person, etc.), the Bank's Major Shareholder (including a person who had been the Bank's Major Shareholder in the case where the major shareholder of the Bank became a person who is no longer the Bank's Major Shareholder and, when the Bank's Major Shareholder is a Juridical Person, etc., it shall be the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or the members who are to perform the duties of the accounting advisors, auditor, representative person, administrator, manager, member who executes the operation, or liquidator of said Juridical Person, etc.), the Specified Major Shareholder (including a person who had been the Specified Major Shareholder in the case where the Specified Major Shareholder became a person who is no longer a holder of voting rights in the Bank that amount to the Lowest Threshold for a Major Shareholder or more and, when the Specified Major Shareholder is a Juridical Person, etc., it shall be the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or the members who are to perform the duties of the accounting advisors, auditor, representative person, administrator, manager, member who executes the operation, or liquidator of said Juridical Person, etc.), the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or the members who are to perform the duties of the accounting advisors, auditor, manager, or liquidator of the Bank Holding Company (including a company that had been the Bank Holding Company in the case where the Bank Holding Company became a company that is no longer a Bank Holding Company), the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or the members who are to perform the duties of the accounting advisors, auditor, manager, member who executes the operation, or liquidator of the Specified Holding Company (including a company that had been the Specified Holding Company in the case where the Specified Holding Company became a company that is no longer a Holding Company which has a Bank as its Subsidiary Company), or the Bank Agent (when the Bank Agent is a juridical person, it shall be the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or the members who are to perform the duties of the accounting advisors, auditor, board member, inspector, representative person, member who executes the operation, or liquidator of said Bank Agent) that has committed such act shall be punished by a fine of not more than one million yen:
第六十五条 次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合には、その行為をした銀行（銀行が第四十一条第一号から第三号までのいずれかに該当して第四条第一項の内閣総理大臣の免許が効力を失つた場合における当該銀行であつた会社を含む。）の取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、支配人若しくは清算人、外国銀行の代表者、代理人若しくは支配人、銀行議決権大量保有者（銀行議決権大量保有者が銀行議決権大量保有者でなくなつた場合における当該銀行議決権大量保有者であつた者を含み、銀行議決権大量保有者が法人等（法人及び第三条の二第一項第一号に掲げる法人でない団体をいう。以下この条において同じ。）であるときは、その取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、代表者、管理人、支配人、業務を執行する社員又は清算人）、銀行主要株主（銀行主要株主が銀行主要株主でなくなつた場合における当該銀行主要株主であつた者を含み、銀行主要株主が法人等であるときは、その取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、代表者、管理人、支配人、業務を執行する社員又は清算人）、特定主要株主（特定主要株主が銀行の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者でなくなつた場合における当該特定主要株主であつた者を含み、特定主要株主が法人等であるときは、その取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、代表者、管理人、支配人、業務を執行する社員又は清算人）、銀行持株会社（銀行持株会社が銀行持株会社でなくなつた場合における当該銀行持株会社であつた会社を含む。）の取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、支配人若しくは清算人、特定持株会社（特定持株会社が銀行を子会社とする持株会社でなくなつた場合における当該特定持株会社であつた会社を含む。）の取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、支配人、業務を執行する社員若しくは清算人又は銀行代理業者（銀行代理業者が法人であるときは、その取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、理事、監事、代表者、業務を執行する社員又は清算人）は、百万円以下の過料に処する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 31-2 (1) A person operating the business of manufacturing or importing any monitoring chemical substance, any Class II Specified Chemical Substance, any chemical substance that has been publicly notified pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4) of Article 4 (including the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (9) of Article 4-2 and the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 5-2), any new chemical substance to which the confirmation under item (v) of paragraph (1) of Article 3 or paragraph (4) of Article 4-2 pertains, or any chemical substance listed in the List of Existing Chemical Substances prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 2 of the Supplementary Provisions that has been publicly notified by the Minister of International Trade and Industry pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4) of said Article (hereinafter referred to as a "substance subject to reporting") shall, when he/she has conducted tests pertaining to the items to be tested prescribed in paragraph (7) of Article 4 or pertaining to the studies of hazardous properties prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 5-4, paragraph (1) of Article 24, or paragraph (1) of Article 25-3 (including the cases in which knowledge equivalent to that which would be obtained from said tests [limited to knowledge that is not publicly known] has been obtained) with regard to the substance subject to reporting he/she has manufactured or imported and if he/she has obtained, as a result thereof, knowledge specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment as one indicating that the substance subject to reporting possesses the following properties, report to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment to that effect and the details of said knowledge, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where said person has obtained said knowledge as a result of a study of hazardous properties to which an instruction under the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 5-4, paragraph (1) of Article 24, or paragraph (1) of Article 25-3 pertains and is reporting the details of said knowledge pursuant to these provisions:
第三十一条の二 監視化学物質、第二種特定化学物質、第四条第四項（第四条の二第九項において読み替えて準用する場合及び第五条の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公示された化学物質、第三条第一項第五号若しくは第四条の二第四項の確認に係る新規化学物質又は附則第二条第四項の規定により通商産業大臣が公示した同条第一項に規定する既存化学物質名簿に記載されている化学物質（以下「報告対象物質」という。）の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者は、その製造又は輸入した報告対象物質について、第四条第七項に規定する試験の項目又は第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項若しくは第二十五条の三第一項に規定する有害性の調査の項目に係る試験を行つた場合（当該試験を行つたと同等の知見（公然と知られていないものに限る。）が得られた場合を含む。）であつて、報告対象物質が次に掲げる性状を有することを示す知見として厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるものが得られたときは、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、その旨及び当該知見の内容を厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣に報告しなければならない。ただし、第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項又は第二十五条の三第一項の規定による指示に係る有害性の調査により当該知見が得られた場合において、これらの規定によりその内容を報告するときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 31-2 (1) A person engaged in the business of manufacturing or importing any chemical substance subject to monitoring, any Class II Specified Chemical Substance, any chemical substance of which the public has been notified pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (4) (including where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 4-2, paragraph (9) and pursuant to Article 5-2, paragraph (2)), or any chemical substance in the list of existing chemical substances prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of which the public has been notified by the Minister of International Trade and Industry pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4) of said Article (hereinafter referred to as a "substance subject to reporting") shall report to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment when he/she has conducted tests with regard to the substance subject to reporting under the items prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (7) or studies of hazardous properties prescribed in Article 5-4, paragraph (1), Article 24, paragraph (1) or Article 25-3, paragraph (1) (including cases in which information equivalent to that which would be obtained from said tests (limited to information that is not publicly known) has been obtained). When, as a result of said tests, the person obtains information specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment indicating that the substance subject to reporting possesses the following properties, he/she shall report to that effect and give the details of such information, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy; provided, however that this shall not apply where said person has obtained said information as a result of a study of hazardous properties to which an instruction under the provisions of Article 5-4, paragraph (1), Article 24, paragraph (1) or Article 25-3, paragraph (1) pertains, and where said person is reporting the details of said information pursuant to these provisions:
第三十一条の二 監視化学物質、第二種特定化学物質、第四条第四項（第四条の二第九項において読み替えて準用する場合及び第五条の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公示された化学物質又は附則第二条第四項の規定により通商産業大臣が公示した同条第一項に規定する既存化学物質名簿に記載されている化学物質（以下「報告対象物質」という。）の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者は、その製造し、又は輸入した報告対象物質について、第四条第七項に規定する試験の項目又は第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項若しくは第二十五条の三第一項に規定する有害性の調査の項目に係る試験を行つた場合（当該試験を行つたと同等の知見（公然と知られていないものに限る。）が得られた場合を含む。）であつて、報告対象物質が次に掲げる性状を有することを示す知見として厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるものが得られたときは、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、その旨及び当該知見の内容を厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣に報告しなければならない。ただし、第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項又は第二十五条の三第一項の規定による指示に係る有害性の調査により当該知見が得られた場合において、これらの規定によりその内容を報告するときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 24 The provisions of Article 20 of the Employment Security Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Worker Dispatching Undertakings. In this case, in paragraph (1) of said Article, the term "The Public Employment Security Offices" shall be deemed to be replaced with "The dispatching business operator prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 23 of the Act for Securing the Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act") (hereinafter simply referred to as a "dispatching business operator")" and the term "shall not introduce job seekers to a place of business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall not carry out Worker Dispatching prescribed in item (i) of Article 2 of the Worker Dispatching Act (hereinafter simply referred to as "Worker Dispatching") (where Worker Dispatching is actually carried out for the place of business at the time of said strike or lock-out, excluding said Worker Dispatching and arrangements equivalent thereto)"; in paragraph (2) of said Article, the term "unlimited introduction of job seekers" shall be deemed to be replaced with "unlimited Worker Dispatching", the term "the Public Employment Security Office shall not introduce job seekers to that place of business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Public Employment Security Office shall notify the dispatching business operator to that effect, and the dispatching business operator, having received the notification, shall not carry out Worker Dispatching for the place of business concerned (where Worker Dispatching is actually carried out for the place of business at the time of the notification, excluding said Worker Dispatching and arrangements equivalent thereto)", the term "workers normally employed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "workers (including workers having been engaged in work under Worker Dispatching arrangements) normally employed", and the term "the introduction of workers" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the provision of Worker Dispatching services".
第二十四条 職業安定法第二十条の規定は、労働者派遣事業について準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「公共職業安定所」とあるのは「労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律（以下「労働者派遣法」という。）第二十三条第一項に規定する派遣元事業主（以下単に「派遣元事業主」という。）」と、「事業所に、求職者を紹介してはならない」とあるのは「事業所に関し、労働者派遣法第二条第一号に規定する労働者派遣（以下単に「労働者派遣」という。）（当該同盟罷業又は作業所閉鎖の行われる際現に当該事業所に関し労働者派遣をしている場合にあつては、当該労働者派遣及びこれに相当するものを除く。）をしてはならない」と、同条第二項中「求職者を無制限に紹介する」とあるのは「無制限に労働者派遣がされる」と、「公共職業安定所は当該事業所に対し、求職者を紹介してはならない」とあるのは「公共職業安定所は、その旨を派遣元事業主に通報するものとし、当該通報を受けた派遣元事業主は、当該事業所に関し、労働者派遣（当該通報の際現に当該事業所に関し労働者派遣をしている場合にあつては、当該労働者派遣及びこれに相当するものを除く。）をしてはならない」と、「使用されていた労働者」とあるのは「使用されていた労働者（労働者派遣に係る労働に従事していた労働者を含む。）」と、「労働者を紹介する」とあるのは「労働者派遣をする」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
- Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
- 本サービスで使用している「Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス」はWikipediaの日本語文を独立行政法人情報通信研究機構が英訳したものを、Creative Comons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0による利用許諾のもと使用しております。詳細はhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ および http://alaginrc.nict.go.jp/WikiCorpus/ をご覧下さい。
- 金融庁
- Copyright(C) 2026 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
- 特許庁
- Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
- ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
- 経済産業省
- Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
