「able」を含む例文一覧(22272)
＜前へ 1 2 .... 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446- This is a rather difficult task, and as I have said over and over again, although it might be easy to restore the postal businesses, whose foundations were shaken by Mr. Koizumi (former Prime Minister), to their former status, that is not what we are going to do. As we are undertaking a grand project of considering how to make use of Japan Post, which we may say is the biggest in the world, for the benefit of the whole of Japan and the entire world, this is a rather challenging task. We are now seeking public opinions and advice from far and wide. We are undertaking this project in the hope of achieving it together with the people, as I have been saying. If you ask me whether our study is proceeding smoothly, I can only say that a plan like this does not take a clear shape until the very last moment. In any case, everyone is doing his part in his own position, so we will be able to set forth a direction by around the end of this month.
なかなか、これは大変な話で、何度も言っているように、小泉（元総理）さんがガタガタにしてしまった郵政事業をその前の姿に戻すというのであればわりと簡単かもしれませんが、そうではないのです。地域のため、また日本全体のため、世界のために、世界一と言っても良い日本郵政株式会社をどうしていくか、という一大事業でありますので、なかなか大変でありますけれども、現在、国民の方々の声を幅広く聞かせていただく、またアドバイスもいただく。そうした、国民の皆さん方と一体となった中でこの事業を成し遂げたいという、かねがね皆様方に申し上げているそうした方針で、現在、取り組んでおります。順調に行っているかどうかと言われると、こういうのは最後の最後にならないと、きちんとした形というのは作れないわけでありますが、それぞれの立場で頑張ってくれておりますので、大体、月末までには一つの方向性を出せるのではないかなと考えております。 - 金融庁 - By way of a summing-up, I express my deep gratitude for the generous assistance that all of you gave me. What left me with a particular impression was our inevitable choice to use – for the first time after the Second World War – the payoff program in relation to the Incubator Bank of Japan, as you know. Despite the fact that it was the first such case after the Second World War, the depositors responded in a very calm fashion. The payoff program is up and running as we speak, and I am grateful that we have been able to implement it in a tranquil fashion. To tell the truth, it was personally a heart-rending experience as I recognize the tremendous inconvenience being caused to those with more than 10 million yen plus its interest in deposit. However, the Deposit Insurance Corporation is currently dealing with the former management to properly look into its criminal and civil responsibilities and other matters. While it is still an ongoing case, this payoff implementation left me with a particularly immense impression among what happened in my three months in office of the Minister for Financial Services.
振り返らせていただきますと、大変、皆様方にもお世話になりましてありがとうございます。印象に残ることは、ご存じのように、戦後初めて日本振興銀行でペイオフを実施せざるを得なかったということでございます。預金者の皆様方に大変冷静な対応をしていただき、戦後初めてのことでございましたが、ペイオフは今、実行中でございますけれども、粛々整々と行わせていただいたことを、本当に私としては、ある意味で1,000万円プラス利子を超える方には、実際の話、大変ご迷惑もかかるわけでございますから、断腸の思いがあったのも事実でございますけれども、しかしながら、今、前の経営陣に対して、預金保険機構は刑事上・民事上の責任を含めてきちんと再生中でございます。まだ進行中でございますけれども、やはりペイオフをさせていただけたことが、この3カ月間ではございましたけれども、非常に金融担当大臣としては残っております。 - 金融庁 - (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if a creditor of the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split who is able to state an objection (limited to a creditor to whom the separate notice set forth in Article 789(2) (excluding item (iii) and including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 793(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall be given; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of Article 789(1)(ii) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 793(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) has not received the separate notice set forth in Article 789(2), such creditor may request the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split to perform the obligations to the extent of the value of property held by the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split on the Effective Day, even in the case where such creditor is not allowed, under the Absorption-type Company Split agreement, to request the Splitting Company in Absorption-type Company Split to perform the obligations after the Absorption-type Company Split.
２ 前項の規定にかかわらず、第七百八十九条第一項第二号（第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）の規定により異議を述べることができる吸収分割会社の債権者（第七百八十九条第二項（第三号を除き、第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の各別の催告をしなければならないものに限る。次項において同じ。）が第七百八十九条第二項の各別の催告を受けなかった場合には、当該債権者は、吸収分割契約において吸収分割後に吸収分割会社に対して債務の履行を請求することができないものとされているときであっても、吸収分割会社に対して、吸収分割会社が効力発生日に有していた財産の価額を限度として、当該債務の履行を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if a creditor of the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split who is able to state an objection (limited to a creditor to whom the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2) (excluding item (iii) and including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall be given; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of Article 810(1)(ii) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) has not received the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2), such creditor may request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations to the extent of the value of property held by the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split on the day of formation of the Stock Company Incorporated through Incorporation-type Company Split, even in the case where such creditor is not allowed, under the Incorporation-type Company Split plan, to request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split plan to perform the obligations after the Incorporation-type Company Split.
２ 前項の規定にかかわらず、第八百十条第一項第二号（第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）の規定により異議を述べることができる新設分割会社の債権者（第八百十条第二項（第三号を除き、第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の各別の催告をしなければならないものに限る。次項において同じ。）が第八百十条第二項の各別の催告を受けなかった場合には、当該債権者は、新設分割計画において新設分割後に新設分割会社に対して債務の履行を請求することができないものとされているときであっても、新設分割会社に対して、新設分割会社が新設分割設立株式会社の成立の日に有していた財産の価額を限度として、当該債務の履行を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if a creditor of the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split who is able to state an objection (limited to a creditor to whom the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2) (excluding item (iii) and including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) shall be given; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of Article 810(1)(ii) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) has not received the separate notice set forth in Article 810(2), such creditor may request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations to the extent of the value of property held by the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split on the day of formation of the Membership Company Incorporated through Incorporation-type Company Split, even in the case where such creditor is not allowed, under the Incorporation-type Company Split plan, to request the Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations after the Incorporation-type Company Split.
２ 前項の規定にかかわらず、第八百十条第一項第二号（第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）の規定により異議を述べることができる新設分割会社の債権者（第八百十条第二項（第三号を除き、第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の各別の催告をしなければならないものに限る。次項において同じ。）が第八百十条第二項の各別の催告を受けなかった場合には、当該債権者は、新設分割計画において新設分割後に新設分割会社に対して債務の履行を請求することができないものとされているときであっても、新設分割会社に対して、新設分割会社が新設分割設立持分会社の成立の日に有していた財産の価額を限度として、当該債務の履行を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) In the cases where the Stock Company(ies) Consolidated through Consolidation-type Merger or the Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company in Share Transfer is a Company with Classes of Shares, if all or part of the shares, etc. of the Stock Company Incorporated through Consolidation-type Merger or the Wholly Owning Parent Stock Company Incorporated through Share Transfer to be delivered to shareholders of the Stock Company(ies) Consolidated through Consolidation-type Merger or the Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company in Share Transfer are Shares with a Restriction on Transfer, etc., the Consolidation-type Merger or the Share Transfer shall not become effective without a resolution of a Class Meeting constituted by Class Shareholders of the class of shares subject to the allotment of the Shares with a Restriction on Transfer, etc. (excluding Shares with a Restriction on Transfer) (in cases where there are two or more classes of shares relating to such Class Shareholders, the respective Class Meetings constituted by Class Shareholders categorized by the class of such two or more classes of shares); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where there is no Class Shareholder able to exercise a voting right at such Class Meeting.
３ 新設合併消滅株式会社又は株式移転完全子会社が種類株式発行会社である場合において、新設合併消滅株式会社又は株式移転完全子会社の株主に対して交付する新設合併設立株式会社又は株式移転設立完全親株式会社の株式等の全部又は一部が譲渡制限株式等であるときは、当該新設合併又は株式移転は、当該譲渡制限株式等の割当てを受ける種類の株式（譲渡制限株式を除く。）の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会（当該種類株主に係る株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあっては、当該二以上の株式の種類別に区分された種類株主を構成員とする各種類株主総会）の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 63-3-2 (1) For the time being, with regard to a disabled child under Admission, etc. in any of the designated retarded child institutions, etc. specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (hereinafter referred to as "Admittee" in this paragraph), when a prefectural government finds that welfare of the Admittee is likely to be impaired unless the Designated Institutional Support for him/her is continued, the prefectural government may, notwithstanding the provision of Article 24-2 paragraph (1), Article 24-6 paragraph (1), Article 24-7 paragraph (1) or Article 24-20 paragraph (1), continue to pay or provide Institutional Benefits for Disabled Children, etc. to said Admittee based on his/her application, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, until said Admittee becomes able to adapt him/herself to social life, even after he/she attains the age of 18; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where said Admittee can receive the treatment and care services provided in Article 5 paragraph (5) of the Act on Self-reliance Support for Persons with Disabilities (hereinafter referred to as "Treatment and Care Services") or other support.
第六十三条の三の二 都道府県は、第二十四条の二第一項、第二十四条の六第一項、第二十四条の七第一項又は第二十四条の二十第一項の規定にかかわらず、当分の間、厚生労働省令で定める指定知的障害児施設等に入所等をした障害児（以下この項において「入所者」という。）について、引き続き指定施設支援を受けなければその福祉を損なうおそれがあると認めるときは、当該入所者が満十八歳に達した後においても、当該入所者からの申請により、当該入所者が社会生活に順応することができるようになるまで、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、引き続き障害児施設給付費等を支給することができる。ただし、当該入所者が障害者自立支援法第五条第五項に規定する療養介護（以下「療養介護」という。）その他の支援を受けることができる場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - 4. Of the total asset value of the trust property, any securities, etc. (except national government bonds, government guaranteed bonds, and call loans with five or less days (except closed days of companies entrusted with the said securities investment trust that give loans) left to become due; hereinafter referred to as "the specific call loans" in this item) issued or dealt with by any one juridical person or other organ (hereinafter referred to as "juridical person, etc." in this item) that are long-term investment securities with the second or higher grade of the specific rating given by two or more designated rating organizations, short-term investment securities with the first grade of the specific rating given by two or more designated rating organizations, or the equivalent which securities investment trust management companies consider to be able to invest in as safely as or more safely than the said securities with the said grade of the specific rating (hereinafter referred to as "the qualified securities, etc.") shall account for 5 percent or less of the values that form the basis of calculation of the total asset value of the trust property.
（４） 信託財産の総額のうちに、一の法人その他の団体（以下この号において「法人等」という。）が発行し、又は取り扱う有価証券等（国債証券、政府保証債及び返済までの期間（貸付けを行う当該証券投資信託の受託者である会社が休業している日を除く。）が五日以内のコールローン（以下この号において「特定コールローン」という。）を除く。）であつて、二以上の指定格付機関から特定格付のうち第二位以上の特定格付が付与された長期有価証券及び特定格付のうち第一位の特定格付が付与された短期有価証券並びに証券投資信託の委託会社がこれらの特定格付が付与された有価証券と同等以上に安全に運用できる対象と認めたもの（以下この号において「適格有価証券等」という。）の当該信託財産の総額の計算の基礎となつた価額の占める割合が、百分の五以下であること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 102 (1) Where a patentee or an exclusive licensee claims against an infringer compensation for damage sustained as a result of the intentional or negligent infringement of the patent right or exclusive license, and the infringer assigned articles that composed the act of infringement, the amount of damage sustained by the patentee or the exclusive licensee may be presumed to be the amount of profit per unit of articles which would have been sold by the patentee or the exclusive licensee if there had been no such act of infringement, multiplied by the quantity (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "assigned quantity") of articles assigned by the infringer, the maximum of which shall be the amount attainable by the patentee or the exclusive licensee in light of the capability of the patentee or the exclusive licensee to work such articles; provided, however, that if any circumstances exist under which the patentee or the exclusive licensee would have been unable to sell the assigned quantity in whole or in part, the amount calculated as the number of articles not able to be sold due to such circumstances shall be deducted.
第百二条 特許権者又は専用実施権者が故意又は過失により自己の特許権又は専用実施権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した物を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した物の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、＜特許権者又は専用実施権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額＞を、特許権者又は専用実施権者の実施の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、特許権者又は専用実施権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を特許権者又は専用実施権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Also, an agreement on Basel III is to be shaped in the upcoming Seoul Summit in November 2010. In the lead up to the Summit, the question of what to do with the quantitative and qualitative capital enhancement targets of international banks has become a major topic of discussion on an international scale. Substantial progress is being made to reach an agreement on this topic. In regards to liquidity regulations on, for example, how much leverage is allowed, nations are close to agreeing on the rough outline, although no consensus has been reached yet on the exact figures. The financial reform legislation, that is, the Dodd-Frank Act, was established in the United States in such a key moment. The detailed provisions and department and government ordinances are to be drafted in the days ahead. I believe I have been able to exchange opinions candidly on their macroeconomic impact and their effects on the financial intermediary functions, as well as the financial and economic climate.
また、今、バーゼルIIIが今度11月のソウルサミットでかなり合意に近いところまでに今なっておりますが、そういった時期を受けて、国際的な銀行における自己資本の質と量との強化の目標をどうするのかということが大きな国際的話題でございますが、これは大分話が煮詰まってきておりますし、また流動性規制につきましても、例えばレバレッジといいますか、どれくらいきかせるのか等々、具体的な数字にまでは至っておりませんけれども、かなりこれは大筋に近づいておりますので、そういったところにおいてアメリカの金融規制改革法、いわゆるドッド・フランクさんですね。（アメリカの法律の多くは）下院議員と上院議員の名前をつけるそうでございますが、ドッド・フランク法が成立いたしまして。今からご存じのように細部、省令、政令をつくるということでございましたが、こういったことがマクロ経済に与える影響、あるいは金融仲介機能に与える影響、それから金融・経済情勢について率直な意見の交換をすることができたというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁 - Article 29 (1) Where a holder of a utility model right or an exclusive licensee claims against an infringer compensation for damage sustained as a result of the intentional or negligent infringement of said d utility model right or exclusive license, and the infringer assigned articles that constituted the act of infringement, the amount of damage sustained by the holder or the exclusive licensee may be presumed to be the amount of profit per unit of articles which would have been sold by the holder or the exclusive licensee if there had been no such act of infringement, multiplied by the quantity (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "Assigned Quantity") of articles assigned by the infringer, the maximum of which shall be the amount attainable by the holder or the exclusive licensee in light of the capability of the holder or the exclusive licensee to work such articles; provided, however, that if any circumstances exist under which the holder or the exclusive licensee would have been unable to sell the Assigned Quantity in whole or in part, the amount calculated as the number of articles not able to be sold due to such circumstances shall be deducted.
第二十九条 実用新案権者又は専用実施権者が故意又は過失により自己の実用新案権又は専用実施権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した物品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した物品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、実用新案権者又は専用実施権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、実用新案権者又は専用実施権者の実施の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、実用新案権者又は専用実施権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を実用新案権者又は専用実施権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 39 (1) Where a holder of design right or an exclusive licensee claims against an infringer compensation for damages sustained as a result of the intentional or negligent infringement of the design right or exclusive license, and the infringer assigned articles that composed the act of infringement, the amount of damages sustained by the holder of such design right or the exclusive licensee may be presumed to be the amount of profit per each unit of article which would have been sold by the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee if there had been no such act of infringement, multiplied by the quantity (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "assigned quantity" of articles) assigned by the infringer, the maximum of which shall be the amount attainable by the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee in light of the capability of the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee to work such articles; provided, however, that if any circumstances exist under which the holder of the design right or the exclusive licensee would have been unable to sell the assigned quantity in whole or in part, the amount calculated as the number of articles not able to be sold due to such circumstances shall be deducted.
第三十九条 意匠権者又は専用実施権者が故意又は過失により自己の意匠権又は専用実施権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した物品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した物品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、意匠権者又は専用実施権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、意匠権者又は専用実施権者の実施の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、意匠権者又は専用実施権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を意匠権者又は専用実施権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 38 (1) Where a holder of trademark right or of exclusive right to use claims against an infringer compensation for damage sustained as a result of the intentional or negligent infringement of the trademark right or the exclusive right to use, and the infringer assigned the goods that composed the act of infringement, the amount of damage sustained by the holder of trademark right or of exclusive right to use may be presumed to be the amount of profit per unit of goods which would have been sold by the holder of trademark right or of exclusive right to use if there had been no such act of infringement, multiplied by the quantity of goods assigned by the infringer (hereinafter referred to as the "Assigned Quantity"), the maximum of which shall be the amount attainable by the holder of trademark right or of exclusive right to use in light of the capability of the holder of trademark right or of exclusive right to use to use such goods; provided, however, that if any circumstances exist under which the holder of trademark right or of exclusive right to use would have been unable to sell the assigned quantity in whole or in part, the amount calculated as the number of goods not able to be sold due to such circumstances shall be deducted.
第三十八条 商標権者又は専用使用権者が故意又は過失により自己の商標権又は専用使用権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した商品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した商品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、商標権者又は専用使用権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた商品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、商標権者又は専用使用権者の使用の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、商標権者又は専用使用権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を商標権者又は専用使用権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) When the obligee effecting a seizure fails to make an offer or to provide a guarantee, as provided in each of the following items for the cases set forth respectively therein, within one week from the day of receipt of a notice under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, by deciding, where there is no preferential claim, a price that exceeds the estimated amount of procedural expenses, or where there is a preferential claim, a price that is not less than the total of the estimated amount of procedural expenses and that of the preferential claim (such a price shall hereinafter be referred to as the "obligee's offered price" in this paragraph), the execution court shall rescind the procedure of a compulsory auction pertaining to the petition filed by the obligee effecting a seizure; provided, however, that this shall not apply when the obligee effecting a seizure has proved, within said period, that none of the items of the preceding paragraph apply, or that in the case set forth in item (ii) of said paragraph, the minimum purchase price of the real property exceeds the estimated amount of procedural expenses and that the consent has been obtained from the persons who have the preferential claim (excluding a person who is expected to be able to receive full performance of his/her preferential claim at the minimum purchase price) for the sale of the real property:
２ 差押債権者が、前項の規定による通知を受けた日から一週間以内に、優先債権がない場合にあつては手続費用の見込額を超える額、優先債権がある場合にあつては手続費用及び優先債権の見込額の合計額以上の額（以下この項において「申出額」という。）を定めて、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、それぞれ当該各号に定める申出及び保証の提供をしないときは、執行裁判所は、差押債権者の申立てに係る強制競売の手続を取り消さなければならない。ただし、差押債権者が、その期間内に、前項各号のいずれにも該当しないことを証明したとき、又は同項第二号に該当する場合であつて不動産の買受可能価額が手続費用の見込額を超える場合において、不動産の売却について優先債権を有する者（買受可能価額で自己の優先債権の全部の弁済を受けることができる見込みがある者を除く。）の同意を得たことを証明したときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Unlike in the case of share flotations, bonds are, like bank borrowing, liabilities ? they incur interest expenses, and the rise in the value of outstanding SME issues in the past few years has probably been prompted by factors such as the following: 1) Being able to raise comparatively long-term funds at fixed interest rates fixes the cost of raising funds for capital investment and other purposes, and so makes it easier to formulate investment and business plans. 2) Privately-placed bonds are placed and underwritten from an investor perspective, ensuring that only prime enterprises can issue bonds. Accordingly, issuing privately-placed bonds not only improves an SME’s image and strengthens its position when negotiating interest rates and loan terms with a financial institution, but can also contribute to improving creditworthiness as an enterprise, and assist in improving an enterprise’s appeal to business partners and attracting human resources. (Some prelisted enterprises issue privately-placed bonds to assist in investor relations.) 3) As they can charge fees for bond issues, financial institutions, too, are focusing on such issues as a means of increasing revenues from non-interest sources.
株式公開の場合と異なり、社債は銀行借入と同様に負債であり、金利支払い負担も生じるが、中小企業の社債発行額がここ数年増加しているのは、〔1〕固定金利で比較的長期の調達ができることから、設備投資等の資金調達コストが確定でき、投資計画・事業計画が立てやすくなる面があること、〔2〕私募債の受託・引受は、投資家としての視点から行われるため、発行可能な企業は優良企業に限られる。したがって、中小企業においては私募債を発行することにより企業イメージが向上し、金融機関との金利交渉、貸出条件交渉が有利になるだけでなく、企業としての信用力向上にも寄与し、取引先へのアピールや人材確保の面からもメリットがあると考えられること（株式公開前の企業では、IRの観点から私募債発行を行うこともある）、〔3〕金融機関においても、社債発行に係る手数料を徴求できることから、非金利収入の増加という観点から力を入れていること、等が勘案されているのではないだろうか。 - 経済産業省 - 2. With regard to securities, savings, negotiable instruments, specified money in trust, and call loans which are objects of investment of trust property (hereinafter referred to as "securities, etc." in this item), the time period left to reach redemption or maturity (hereinafter referred to as "the remaining period" in this item) shall not exceed one year, and they shall be long-term investment securities (securities with one year or more period from the issue to the redemption; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) with the third or higher grade of the designated rating prescribed in item (i)-v of paragraph (4) of Article 9-4 of the Cabinet Office Ordinance concerning Disclosure of Corporate Affairs, etc. (Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance No. 5 of 1973) (hereinafter referred to as "the designated rating" in this item) given by one or more specified rating organizations (the organizations prescribed in item (xiii-ii) of Article 1 of the said Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), short-term investment securities (securities with less-than-one year period from the issue to the redemption; hereinafter in this item the same shall apply) with the second or higher of the specific rating given by the organizations, or the equivalent which securities investment trust management companies consider to be able to invest in as safely as or more safely than the said securities with the said grade of the specific rating.
（２） 信託財産の運用の対象となる有価証券、預金、手形、指定金銭信託及びコールローン（以下この号において「有価証券等」という。）は、償還又は満期までの期間（以下この号において「残存期間」という。）が一年を超えないものであつて、一以上の指定格付機関（企業内容等の開示に関する内閣府令（昭和四十八年大蔵省令第五号）第一条第十三号の二に規定する指定格付機関をいう。以下この号において同じ。）から同令第九条の四第四項第一号ホに規定する特定格付（以下この号において「特定格付」という。）のうち第三位以上の特定格付が付与された長期有価証券（発行から償還までの期間が一年以上の有価証券をいう。以下この号において同じ。）若しくは特定格付のうち第二位以上の特定格付が付与された短期有価証券（発行から償還までの期間が一年未満の有価証券をいう。以下この号において同じ。）又は証券投資信託の委託会社がこれらの特定格付が付与された有価証券と同等以上に安全に運用できる対象と認めたものであること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 17 With regard to a Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities that is subject to the main clause of Article 4(1) or the main clause of Article 4(2) or Already Disclosed Securities, a person who has another person acquire the Securities using a Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1) that contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks a statement on important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding, or a material that contains any false indication or misleading indication on important matters or lacks indication on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding, shall be held liable to compensate damage sustained by the other person who acquires the Securities without knowing of the existence of such fake statement, lack of such statement, the existence of such false indication or misleading indication or lack of such indication; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where the person liable for such damage proves that he/she did not know of, and was not able to know of even with reasonable care, the existence of such fake statement, lack of such statement, the existence of such false indication or misleading indication or lack of such indication.
第十七条 第四条第一項本文若しくは第二項本文の規定の適用を受ける有価証券又は既に開示された有価証券の募集又は売出しについて、重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、若しくは記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な事実の記載が欠けている第十三条第一項の目論見書又は重要な事項について虚偽の表示若しくは誤解を生ずるような表示があり、若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な事実の表示が欠けている資料を使用して有価証券を取得させた者は、記載が虚偽であり、若しくは欠けていること又は表示が虚偽であり、若しくは誤解を生ずるような表示であり、若しくは表示が欠けていることを知らないで当該有価証券を取得した者が受けた損害を賠償する責めに任ずる。ただし、賠償の責めに任ずべき者が、記載が虚偽であり、若しくは欠けていること又は表示が虚偽であり、若しくは誤解を生ずるような表示であることを知らず、かつ、相当な注意を用いたにもかかわらず知ることができなかつたことを証明したときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 34 (1) Where the holder of a breeder's right or of an exclusive exploitation right claims, against a person who has intentionally or negligently infringed his/her breeder's right or exclusive exploitation right, compensation for damages caused to him/her by the infringement, if the person has transferred the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products which is the component of the act of infringement, the amount of damage suffered by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right may be presumed, within the limit attainable by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right in consideration of his/her capability to exploit such propagating material, harvested material or processed products, to be the amount given by multiplying the quantity of the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products transferred by the person (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "transferred quantity") by the profit per unit of the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products which would have been sold by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right if there had been no such an act of infringement. However, if there exists any circumstance under which the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right may not be able to sell the transferred quantity in whole or in part, the amount corresponding to the quantity which would not have been sold due to such a circumstance shall be deducted.
第三十四条 育成者権者又は専用利用権者が故意又は過失により自己の育成者権又は専用利用権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した種苗、収穫物又は加工品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した種苗、収穫物又は加工品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、育成者権者又は専用利用権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた種苗、収穫物又は加工品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、育成者権者又は専用利用権者の利用の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、育成者権者又は専用利用権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を育成者権者又は専用利用権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - As we have done every year, we selected cases from the inspection results reported from July of last year to June of this year and published them in the form of the latest Compilation of Problem Cases Raised in Financial Inspections for the 2009 program year, as you've just pointed out, which I expect each financial institution to refer to when formulating its future internal control system. With the successful enactment of the SME Financing Facilitation Act when former Minister Kamei was in office, it is now ensured, as you know, that in times of an economic downturn like the one we currently find ourselves in, financial institutions should adequately address requests for easing lending terms or changing housing loan terms, etc. In a sense, this has achieved a substantial change, if not quite a sea change, from the way financial administration was run in the past, and we need to keep that in mind. I know an SME owner in my hometown who employs about 100 people, about 50 of them being permanent employees and the rest working on a non-permanent basis, and who says that he is able to barely survive thanks to the establishment of the SME Financing Facilitation Act but also speaks out, "Mr. Jimi, we are now desperate for more work." He also goes on to say that "I personally feel that I could close down the business, but I am hanging on, struggling with all my might - because every one of my 100 workers has a family."
今ご指摘のとおり、引き続き平成21年の事務年度においても昨年7月から今年6月までに通知された検査結果の中から事例を選定し、金融検査指摘事例集として公表しているところでありまして、各金融機関におかれましては本事例集を今後の内部管理の態勢構築の参考にしていただければと思っておりますが、中小企業金融円滑化法案を亀井大臣のときに成立させていただきまして、ご存じのように条件の緩和、あるいはこういった不況のときでございますから、あるいは住宅ローンの条件の変更等々にきちっと応じるようにと、かなりある意味で従来の金融行政から変革をある意味できちっと、コペルニクス的とは言いませんけれども、かなり大きな変化をしたわけでございますから、そういうことを拳拳服膺（けんけんふくよう）して、私がいつか申し上げましたように、私の地元の中小企業でも100人ぐらい従業員抱えているところ、これは50人ぐらい正規社員、50人ぐらい非正規社員で、この金融円滑化法案ができたので何とか生き延びているけれども、「自見さん、あとは仕事が何とか出てこないか」と、「今、必死で我慢して自分自身は廃業してもいいと思っているのだけれども、それに100人みんな家庭があるから一生懸命頑張っているのだ」と。 - 金融庁 - (18) The term "Preventive Long-Term Care Support" as used in this Act means that a person as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare among the personnel of a community general support center as prescribed in Article 115-39, paragraph (1) of this Act, with regard to a Person Requiring In-Home Support, considers said a Person's mental and physical condition, the present environment of said Person, the preferences, etc., of said Person Requiring In-Home Support and those of his or her family according to the request of said Person Requiring In-Home Support, and establishes a plan that stipulates the type and content of a Designated Provider of a Preventive Service to Long-Term Care Service, etc., that said Person will use, the personnel in charge of said services, and other items as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (herein referred to as "Preventive Long-Term Care Service Plan" in this paragraph and the appended table) in order for the Person Requiring In-Home Support to be able to use appropriately those services as prescribed in Article 53, paragraph (1) of this Act that are of a Designated Preventive Long-Term Care Service, Preventive Long-Term Care Service pertaining to Exceptional Allowance for Preventive Service of Long-Term Care or services equivalent to said service, those services as prescribed in Article 54-2, paragraph (1) that are Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care pertaining to Exceptional Allowance for Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, or equivalent services to said service, or other health and medical services or public aid services contributing to prevention of long-term care (herein referred to as "Designated Preventive Long-Term Care Service, etc.") and that said personnel provide liaison and coordination among those who are a Designated Provider of a Preventive Service to Long-Term Care prescribed in Article 53, paragraph (1) of this Act, those who are a Designated Person Providing Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in Article 54-2, paragraph (1), and other personnel, and other convenience in order to ensure the provision of the Designated Preventive Long-Term Care Service, etc., based on said Preventive Long-Term Care Service Plan. The term "Preventive Long-Term Care Support Business" as used in this Act means a business that provides a Preventive Long-Term Care Support.
１８ この法律において「介護予防支援」とは、居宅要支援者が第五十三条第一項に規定する指定介護予防サービス又は特例介護予防サービス費に係る介護予防サービス若しくはこれに相当するサービス、第五十四条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービス又は特例地域密着型介護予防サービス費に係る地域密着型介護予防サービス若しくはこれに相当するサービス及びその他の介護予防に資する保健医療サービス又は福祉サービス（以下この項において「指定介護予防サービス等」という。）の適切な利用等をすることができるよう、第百十五条の三十九第一項に規定する地域包括支援センターの職員のうち厚生労働省令で定める者が、当該居宅要支援者の依頼を受けて、その心身の状況、その置かれている環境、当該居宅要支援者及びその家族の希望等を勘案し、利用する指定介護予防サービス等の種類及び内容、これを担当する者その他厚生労働省令で定める事項を定めた計画（以下この項及び別表において「介護予防サービス計画」という。）を作成するとともに、当該介護予防サービス計画に基づく指定介護予防サービス等の提供が確保されるよう、第五十三条第一項に規定する指定介護予防サービス事業者、第五十四条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者その他の者との連絡調整その他の便宜の提供を行うことをいい、「介護予防支援事業」とは、介護予防支援を行う事業をいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (21) The term "In-Home Long-Term Care Support" as used in this Act means to establish a plan (herein referred to as an "In-Home Service Plan" in this paragraph, Article 115-38, paragraph (1), item (v), and the appended table to this Act) that provides the types and contents of Designated In-Home Service, etc. (herein referred to as "Designated In-Home Service, etc." in this paragraph), the personnel in charge of said services to be used by an In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care, and other items as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, at the request of said Person Requiring Long-Term Care and in consideration of his or her mental and physical condition, surroundings, and the person's and his or her family's preferences, etc., in order for an In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care to be able to use appropriately the Designated In-Home Service as prescribed in Article 41, paragraph (1) of this Act, In-Home Service related to Exceptional Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service or equivalent services, Designated Community-Based Service as prescribed in Article 42-2, paragraph (1) of this Act, Community-Based Service related to Exceptional Allowance for Community-Based Long-Term Care Service or equivalent services, and other necessary health and medical services or public aid services for performing daily activities at home (hereinafter referred to as "Designated In-Home Service, etc." in this paragraph); the term also means to provide communication and coordination among Designated Providers of In-Home Long-Term Care as prescribed in Article 41, paragraph (1) of this Act, Designated Community-Based Service Provider as prescribed in Article 42-2, paragraph (1) of this Act and other person and to provide other conveniences in order to ensure provision of the Designated In-Home Service, etc., based on said In-Home Service Plan, and in a case when said In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care requires admission to a Community-Based Facility for the Elderly Covered by Public Aid Requiring Long-Term Care or a Facility Providing Insured Long-Term Care, the term means to introduce a Community-Based Facility for the Elderly Covered by Public Aid Requiring Long-Term Care or Facility Providing Insured Long-Term Care and to provide other conveniences. The term "Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support Business" as used in this Act means a business to provide In-Home Long-Term Care Support.
２１ この法律において「居宅介護支援」とは、居宅要介護者が第四十一条第一項に規定する指定居宅サービス又は特例居宅介護サービス費に係る居宅サービス若しくはこれに相当するサービス、第四十二条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型サービス又は特例地域密着型介護サービス費に係る地域密着型サービス若しくはこれに相当するサービス及びその他の居宅において日常生活を営むために必要な保健医療サービス又は福祉サービス（以下この項において「指定居宅サービス等」という。）の適切な利用等をすることができるよう、当該居宅要介護者の依頼を受けて、その心身の状況、その置かれている環境、当該居宅要介護者及びその家族の希望等を勘案し、利用する指定居宅サービス等の種類及び内容、これを担当する者その他厚生労働省令で定める事項を定めた計画（以下この項、第百十五条の三十八第一項第五号及び別表において「居宅サービス計画」という。）を作成するとともに、当該居宅サービス計画に基づく指定居宅サービス等の提供が確保されるよう、第四十一条第一項に規定する指定居宅サービス事業者、第四十二条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型サービス事業者その他の者との連絡調整その他の便宜の提供を行い、並びに当該居宅要介護者が地域密着型介護老人福祉施設又は介護保険施設への入所を要する場合にあっては、地域密着型介護老人福祉施設又は介護保険施設への紹介その他の便宜の提供を行うことをいい、「居宅介護支援事業」とは、居宅介護支援を行う事業をいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) The adjustment rate of insurance premiums as set forth in the preceding paragraph, if each Municipality that participates in said Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Municipality" in this Article and paragraph (2) of the following Article) imposes upon each Primary Insured Person an insurance premium according to the amount of insurance premium that is calculated by using the rate of adjustment of insurance premiums, shall be the total amount of insurance premiums received during the project implementation period (which means a period that shall be deemed to be three years that is provided by a Specified Municipality pursuant to the provisions of the constitution referred to in the following paragraph as one period to implement said Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph and paragraph (4)) for each said Specified Municipality to be able to maintain a balance of the total amount of the disbursements necessary to provide for Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits (except with regard to the disbursements necessary for said Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits, the amount defrayed or granted to a general fund or Payment Fund by the national government, a prefecture, or Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of Article 121, paragraph (1), Article 122, paragraph (1), Article 123, paragraph (1), Article 124, paragraph (1) and Article 125, paragraph (1)), the disbursements necessary for Community Support Projects (except with regard to the disbursements necessary for said Community Support Projects, the amount defrayed or granted to the general fund or Payment Fund by the national government, a prefecture, or Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of Article 122-2, Article 123, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 124, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), and Article 126, paragraph (1)), the disbursements necessary for payment of a Fiscal Stability Fund contribution, and the disbursements necessary for repayment of Borrowings for Fund Project during said project implementation period in said Municipality, and be determined by said Specified Municipality in accordance with the standards provided by a Cabinet Order.
２ 前項の調整保険料率は、市町村相互財政安定化事業を行う市町村（以下この条及び次条第二項において「特定市町村」という。）のそれぞれが、それぞれの第一号被保険者に対し、当該調整保険料率により算定した保険料額によって保険料を課するとしたならば、当該特定市町村につき事業実施期間（市町村相互財政安定化事業を実施する期間として特定市町村が次項の規約により定める三年を一期とする期間をいう。以下この項及び第四項において同じ。）において収納される保険料の額の合計額が、当該事業実施期間における当該特定市町村の介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用の額（当該介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用の額につき第百二十一条第一項、第百二十二条第一項、第百二十三条第一項、第百二十四条第一項及び第百二十五条第一項の規定により、国、都道府県、市町村の一般会計及び支払基金が負担し、又は交付する額を除く。）、地域支援事業に要する費用の額（当該地域支援事業に要する費用の額につき第百二十二条の二、第百二十三条第三項及び第四項、第百二十四条第三項及び第四項並びに第百二十六条第一項の規定により、国、都道府県、市町村の一般会計及び支払基金が負担し、又は交付する額を除く。）、財政安定化基金拠出金の納付に要する費用の額並びに基金事業借入金の償還に要する費用の額の合計額と均衡を保つことができるものであって、当該特定市町村が政令で定める基準に従い定めるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
- 金融庁
- Copyright(C) 2026 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
- ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
- 経済産業省
- Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
