「until」を含む例文一覧(30917)

＜前へ 1 2 .... 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619
  • (a) After the action of the Examiner, if the same be adverse in any respect, the applicant, if he persists in his application for a patent, must reply thereto and may request re-examination or reconsideration, with or without amendment. (b) In order to be entitled to re-examination or reconsideration, the applicant must make a request therefor in writing, and he must distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the Examiner’s action; the applicant must respond to every ground of objection and rejection in the prior Examiner’s action (except that request may be made that objections or requirements as to form, not necessary to further consideration of the claims, be held in abeyance until a claim is allowed), and the applicant’s action must appear throughout to be a bona fide attempt to advance the case to final action. The mere allegation that the Examiner has erred will not be received as a proper reason for such reexamination or reconsideration. (c) In amending an application in response to a rejection, the applicant must clearly point out the patentable inventiveness and novelty which he thinks the claims present, in view of the state of the art disclosed by the references cited or the objections made. He must also show how the amendments avoid such references or objections.
    (a)審査官による処分後，その処分が何れかの点において出願人に不利であった場合において，出願人がその特許出願を続行しようとするときは，出願人は，当該処分に応答した上で，補正して又は補正することなく再審査又は再審理を請求することができる。 (b)再審査又は再審理の権利を得るためには，出願人は，書面によりこれを請求しなければならず，審査官による処分の過誤と考えられる点を明瞭かつ詳細に指摘しなければならない。出願人は，審査官による以前の処分における異論及び拒絶の理由の何れにも応答しなければならない(ただし，クレームの更なる検討には関係しない方式についての異論又は要求を，クレームが許容されるまで保留にするように求める請求をすることができる)。また，出願人の行為は，一貫して，出願を最終処分まで進めるための善意の試みであることを示すものでなければならない。審査官が過誤を犯した旨の単なる主張は，再審査又は再審理の適切な理由として認められない。 (c)拒絶に応答して出願を補正するに際し，出願人は，引例によって開示された技術水準又は申し立てられた異論を考慮して，クレームが提示していると考える特許可能な発明性及び新規性を明瞭に指摘しなければならない。出願人は，当該補正が当該引例又は異論をどのように回避するかも示さなければならない。 - 特許庁
  • People employed by enterprises have thus generally grown more risk averse in recent years. Regarding the relationship between the decline in the prospective entry rate and recent changes in the labor market such as those described in Chapter 2, attention may be drawn to the following: (1) the seniority-based pay systems found primarily at large enterprises up to the 1990s were recognized as having become entrenched as "Japanesestyle employment practices," and the future wages expected by people rose; (2) the negative effects of the deflationary economy in the 1990s first manifested themselves in the form of an increase in bankruptcies and exits among small enterprises such as the selfemployed, and there was a conspicuous decrease in the incomes and a conspicuous increase in the risks of selfemployment expected by people; (3) as full-fledged employment adjustment did not really impact on employees of large enterprises until the latter half of the 1990s, it took considerable time for future expected wages to fall; and (4) the instability of income after mandatory retirement even with "Japanese-style employment practices" has long been recognized, enterprises restructured their middle-aged and older workers in the 1990s, conditions in the elderly reemployment market remained severe, and wages of employees in their fifties underwent adjustment from a comparatively early stage, creating the possibility that for the middle-aged and elderly, the opportunity cost of entry compared with changing jobs has fallen, in addition to which people in this age group were comparatively less affected by the effects of the collapse of the bubble, such as the decline in home prices.
    このように、近年、企業に雇用される人々の意識が一般的にはリスク回避的になり、開業希望率が減少していることと、第2章で述べたような、近年の労働市場の変化等との関係については、〔1〕1990年代まで大企業を中心とする年功賃金制が「日本的雇用慣行」として定着していると認識され、人々の予想する将来賃金が上昇してきたこと、〔2〕1990年代のデフレ経済の悪影響がまず自営業等の小規模な企業から破産・廃業の増加等の形で現れ、人々の予想する自営業の所得が顕著に低下しリスクが顕著に増加したこと、〔3〕大企業の被雇用者に本格的な雇用調整が及んだのは1990年代後半であったことから、将来の予想賃金が低下するにはかなり時間がかかったこと、〔4〕定年退職後の収入については、「日本的雇用慣行」の下でも不安定性があることが早くから認識され、また、1990年代に企業が中高齢層のリストラを進め高齢者の転職市場は厳しい状況が続き、50歳代の賃金については大企業でも比較的早くから調整が進んだことから、中高齢者にとっては転職と比較して開業することの機会費用が下がった可能性があること、また、この年代の人々はバブル崩壊による持ち家価格の低下等の影響を被ることが比較的少なかったこと等が指摘できる。 - 経済産業省
  • Article 68-88-2 (1) Where a consolidated parent corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency, the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the consolidated corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the consolidated corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax.
    第六十八条の八十八の二　連結親法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、当該申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（当該申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、当該申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day.
    ２　新銀行法第十三条第二項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額（同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等（同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 58 (1) Where a person entitled to the right to receive a disability compensation pension has died, if the total of the amount of the disability compensation pension paid to said person (for the part of said disability compensation pension paid for the period until July of the fiscal year containing the day on which the person died (in cases where the month containing said day on which the person died falls on any of the months from April to July, the previous fiscal year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the provisions of Article 16-6, paragraph (2) as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) and the amount of the disability compensation pension advance lump sum payment pertaining to said disability compensation pension paid to said person (in cases where the grounds for the payment of said disability compensation pension advance lump sum payment arose in or before July of the fiscal year containing said day on which the person died, the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the method of calculating the amount of the compensation pension for surviving family under the provision of said paragraph as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) is less than the amount among those listed in the right-hand column of the following table corresponding to the grade of disability pertaining to the relevant disability compensation pension listed in the left-hand column of said table (in cases where said day on which the person died is August 1 of the fiscal year two years after the fiscal year the day of the occurrence of the grounds for calculation or any subsequent day, the amount to be obtained where the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the provision of Article 8-3, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-4 as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is regarded as the basic daily benefit amount in said table), the government shall, for the time being, pay a disability compensation pension balance lump sum payment equivalent to the amount of such balance as insurance benefits to the surviving family members of said person based on their claims.
    第五十八条　政府は、当分の間、障害補償年金を受ける権利を有する者が死亡した場合において、その者に支給された当該障害補償年金の額（当該障害補償年金のうち当該死亡した日の属する年度（当該死亡した日の属する月が四月から七月までの月に該当する場合にあつては、その前年度。以下この項において同じ。）の七月以前の分として支給された障害補償年金にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより第十六条の六第二項の規定の例により算定して得た額）及び当該障害補償年金に係る障害補償年金前払一時金の額（当該障害補償年金前払一時金を支給すべき事由が当該死亡した日の属する年度の七月以前に生じたものである場合にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による遺族補償年金の額の算定の方法に準じ算定して得た額）の合計額が次の表の上欄に掲げる当該障害補償年金に係る障害等級に応じ、それぞれ同表の下欄に掲げる額（当該死亡した日が算定事由発生日の属する年度の翌々年度の八月一日以後の日である場合にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより第八条の四において準用する第八条の三第一項の規定の例により算定して得た額を同表の給付基礎日額とした場合に得られる額）に満たないときは、その者の遺族に対し、その請求に基づき、保険給付として、その差額に相当する額の障害補償年金差額一時金を支給する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 61 (1) Where a person entitled to the right to receive a disability pension has died, if the total of the amount of the disability pension paid to said person (for the part of said disability pension paid for the period until July of the fiscal year containing said day on which the person died (in cases where the month containing the day on which the person died falls in any of the months from April to July, the previous fiscal year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the provisions of Article 16-6, paragraph (2) as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) and the amount of the disability pension advance lump sum payment pertaining to said disability pension paid to said person (in cases where the grounds for the payment of said disability pension advance lump sum payment arose in or before July of the fiscal year containing said day on which the person died, the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the method of calculating the amount of the compensation pension for surviving family under said paragraph as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) is less than the amount among those listed in the right-hand column of the table in Article 58, paragraph (1) corresponding to the grade of disability pertaining to the relevant disability pension listed in the left-hand column of said table (in cases where said day on which the person died is August 1 of the fiscal year two years after the fiscal year containing the day of the occurrence of the grounds for calculation or any subsequent day, the amount to be obtained where the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the provision of Article 8-3, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-4 as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is regarded as the basic daily benefit amount in said table), the government shall, for the time being, pay a disability pension balance lump sum payment equivalent to the amount of such balance, as insurance benefits, to the surviving family members of said person based on their claims.
    第六十一条　政府は、当分の間、障害年金を受ける権利を有する者が死亡した場合において、その者に支給された当該障害年金の額（当該障害年金のうち当該死亡した日の属する年度（当該死亡した日の属する月が四月から七月までの月に該当する場合にあつては、その前年度。以下この項において同じ。）の七月以前の分として支給された障害年金にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより第十六条の六第二項の規定の例により算定して得た額）及び当該障害年金に係る障害年金前払一時金の額（当該障害年金前払一時金を支給すべき事由が当該死亡した日の属する年度の七月以前に生じたものである場合にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による遺族補償年金の額の算定の方法に準じ算定して得た額）の合計額が第五十八条第一項の表の上欄に掲げる当該障害年金に係る障害等級に応じ、それぞれ同表の下欄に掲げる額（当該死亡した日が算定事由発生日の属する年度の翌々年度の八月一日以後の日である場合にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより第八条の四において準用する第八条の三第一項の規定の例により算定して得た額を同表の給付基礎日額とした場合に得られる額）に満たないときは、その者の遺族に対し、その請求に基づき、保険給付として、その差額に相当する額の障害年金差額一時金を支給する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 66-4-2 (1) Where a domestic corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency (including the cases where a foreign corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the competent authority of the other Contracting State which is related to the foreign corporation), the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax.
    第六十六条の四の二　内国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合（外国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき当該外国法人に係る条約相手国の権限ある当局に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合を含む。）には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、これらの申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（これらの申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、これらの申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (iv) The term "advanced clinical training" means the practices listed in the following (a) to (n) inclusive, conducted by foreign medical practitioners or dental practitioners, or foreign nurses, etc. (excluding a person who has a license which corresponds to the license for a emergency life-saving technician in a foreign country (hereinafter referred to as a "foreign emergency life-saving technician"); hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), who have entered Japan for the purpose of learning medical knowledge and skills, which are conducted at a hospital designated by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (hereinafter referred to as a "designated hospital" in this item) based on the classification of the license which corresponds to the license listed in the following (a) to (n) inclusive, in such foreign country respectively, under the on-site instruction and supervision of a medical or dental clinical instructor, or a clinical instructor (limited to a person who has any of the licenses listed in the following (c) to (n) inclusive, which corresponds to the license held by the applicable foreign nurse, etc. in a foreign country), and the practices listed in the following (o) conducted by foreign emergency life-saving technicians, who have entered Japan for the purpose of learning medical knowledge and skills, which are conducted in an ambulance, etc. prescribed by Article 44, paragraph (2) of the Emergency Life-saving Technicians Act (Act No. 36 of 1991), (hereinafter referred to as an "ambulance, etc." in this item) transporting a patient in a serious condition prescribed by Article 2, paragraph (1) of such Act (hereinafter referred to as a "serious patient" in this item) to a designated hospital or before and until the serious patient is put into the ambulance, etc. for transportation to such designated hospital, to the extent an emergency medical treatment or care prescribed by Article 2, paragraph (1) of such Act is found necessary and under the on-site instruction and supervision of a clinical instructor (limited to a medical practitioner or an emergency life-saving technician).
    四　臨床修練　医療に関する知識及び技能の修得を目的として本邦に入国した外国医師若しくは外国歯科医師又は外国看護師等（外国において救急救命士に相当する資格を有する者（以下「外国救急救命士」という。）を除く。以下この号において同じ。）が厚生労働大臣の指定する病院（以下この号において「指定病院」という。）において臨床修練指導医若しくは臨床修練指導歯科医又は臨床修練指導者（当該外国看護師等が外国において有する資格に相当する次のハからカまでに掲げる資格を有する者に限る。）の実地の指導監督の下にその外国において有する次のイからカまでに掲げる資格に相当する資格の区分に応じ、それぞれイからカまでに定める業を行うこと並びに医療に関する知識及び技能の修得を目的として本邦に入国した外国救急救命士が指定病院に救急救命士法（平成三年法律第三十六号）第二条第一項に規定する重度傷病者（以下この号において「重度傷病者」という。）を搬送する同法第四十四条第二項に規定する救急用自動車等（以下この号において「救急用自動車等」という。）において、又は当該指定病院への搬送のため重度傷病者を救急用自動車等に乗せるまでの間において同法第二条第一項に規定する救急救命処置を行うことが必要と認められる場合に臨床修練指導者（医師又は救急救命士に限る。）の実地の指導監督の下に次のヨに定める業を行うことをいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) If (i) any Interested Partner fails to pay its taxes and other public duties in connection with the business of the Partnership without any justifiable reason, or (ii) the General Partner reasonably determines that the General Partner or the Partnership is required by applicable laws to withhold taxes with respect to any Interested Partner or pay any taxes and other public duties (including tax payments required by an amendment notice, determination notice, tax payment notice and any other tax assessment issued by a Japanese tax authority) on behalf of or with respect to any Interested Partner, the General Partner may, in making a distribution pursuant to Article 29, in its discretion, (x) deduct cash or property that is to be distributed to such Interested Partner by an amount equal to such unpaid amount or amount paid from the Partnership Assets to be distributed to such Interested Partner and (y) sell such property in such a manner as the General Partner in its discretion deems appropriate, and pay such taxes and other public duties. In such case, the General Partner may make such withholding or payment of taxes or other public duties and collect cash or property in the same manner. Upon request of the General Partner, the Interested Partner shall immediately pay to the General Partner (a) the amount necessary for payment of such taxes or other public duties or (b) if the General Partner has already made such payment, the amount paid by the General Partner, together with interest at [__]% per annum for the period from the date of payment by the General Partner until the date of actual payment by the Interested Partner prorated on the basis of a 365-day year. These payments shall not be treated as part of any contribution to the Partnership. The General Partner shall not be liable for its determinations under this paragraph (including the determination, manner or results of any sale).
    3. 組合員等が正当な事由なく本組合の事業に関し各自が負担すべき公租公課を滞納した場合、又は無限責任組合員若しくは本組合が適用法令上組合員等に関連して源泉徴収を行い若しくは組合員等に代わり若しくは組合員等に関連して公租公課の納付（更正通知、決定通知、納税告知その他日本の税務当局によりなされた課税査定により必要とされる納税を含む。）を行うことが必要とされるものと無限責任組合員が合理的に判断する場合、無限責任組合員は、その裁量により、第29 条に基づく分配を行うに際し、当該組合員等に分配すべき組合財産の中から当該滞納額又は納付額に相当する現金又は現物を控除し、現物についてはその裁量により適切と認める方法によりこれを売却した上、当該公租公課を支払うことができるものとする。この場合、無限責任組合員は、かかる源泉徴収又は公租公課の納付を行った上で、かかる方法により現金又は現物を収受することもできる。組合員等は、かかる支払いに必要な金額又は支払った金額につき、無限責任組合員から請求があれば、無限責任組合員において既にかかる支払いを行った後であればかかる支払いの日から組合員等による現実の支払いがなされた日までの期間につき年［ ］%（年365 日の日割り計算とする。）の利息を付して、無限責任組合員に対し直ちにこれを支払うものとする。かかる支払いは本組合への出資とはみなされない。なお、無限責任組合員は、本項の判断（売却の決定、方法及び結果を含む。）につき、いかなる責任も負わないものとする。 - 経済産業省
  • (3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day.
    ３　新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 4 Until the date of whichever registration filed under Article 293 of the New Act first becomes effective, with regard to the application of the provisions of Article 98, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4), the term, "a Consumer Protection Fund (limited to a Consumer Protection Fund which said Futures Commission Merchant joined as a Member; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" in the same Article, paragraph (1), item (i) shall be deemed to be replaced with, "Association of Compensation Funds"; the phrase, "a Futures Commission Merchant has fallen under the category of a Futures Commission Merchant Subject to a Notice (which means a Futures Commission Merchant Subject to a Notice prescribed in the provisions of Article 304 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter)" shall be deemed to be replaced with, "the Association of Compensation Funds that is the trust administrator judges it is necessary for the smooth repayment of said Futures Commission Merchant's debts pertaining to the return of the customer's assets to a customer"; the term, "a Consumer Protection Fund" shall be deemed to be replaced with, "Association of Compensation Funds"; the phrase, "only the Consumer Protection Fund" shall be deemed to be replaced with, "only the Association of Compensation Funds"; the phrase, "of a Consumer Protection Fund" shall be deemed to be replaced with, "of the Association of Compensation Funds"; the phrase, "when a Futures Commission Merchant has fallen under the category of a Futures Commission Merchant Subject to a Notice, other trust administrators" shall be deemed to be replaced with, "the trust administrator"; the phrase, "with a Consumer Protection Fund" in the same paragraph, item (ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with, "with the Association of Compensation Funds"; the phrase, "when a Futures Commission Merchant has fallen under the category of a Futures Commission Merchant Subject to a Notice, other Consumer Protection Funds" shall be deemed to be replaced with, "the Association of Compensation Funds"; the phrase, "said Consumer Protection Fund" shall be deemed to be replaced with, "said Association of Compensation Funds"; the phrase, "of the Consumer Protection Fund" shall be deemed to be replaced with, "of the Association of Compensation Funds"; the phrase, "to a Consumer Protection Fund" in the same paragraph, item (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with, "to the Association of Compensation Funds"; the phrase, "of the Consumer Protection Fund" shall be deemed to be replaced with, "of the Association of Compensation Funds"; the phrase, "when a Futures Commission Merchant has fallen under the category of a Futures Commission Merchant Subject to a Notice, other Consumer Protection Funds" shall be deemed to be replaced with, "the Association of Compensation Funds"; the term, "Consumer Protection Fund" shall be deemed to be replaced with, "Association of Compensation Funds"; the phrase, "to the Consumer Protection Fund" in the same paragraph, item (iv) shall be deemed to be replaced with, "to the Association of Compensation Funds"; the phrase, "unless the Consumer Protection Fund" shall be deemed to be replaced with "unless the Association of Compensation Funds"; the term, "by a Consumer Protection Fund" shall be deemed to be replaced with, "by the Association of Compensation Funds"; the phrase, "in the cases where a Futures Commission Merchant has fallen under the category of a Futures Commission Merchant Subject to a Notice or where a Consumer Protection Fund" shall be deemed to be replaced with "when the Association of Compensation Funds"; the phrase, "Consumer Protection Fund" shall be deemed to be replaced with, "Association of Compensation Funds"; the term, "Consumer Protection Fund" in the same Article, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Association of Compensation Funds", respectively.
    第四条　新法第二百九十三条の登録のうち最初のものの効力が生じる日までの間は、第九十八条第一項及び第四項の規定の適用については、同条第一項第一号中「委託者保護基金（当該商品取引員が会員として加入している委託者保護基金に限る。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「補償基金協会」と、「商品取引員が通知商品取引員（法第三百四条に規定する通知商品取引員をいう。以下同じ。）に該当することとなった」とあるのは「信託管理人である補償基金協会が当該商品取引員の有する取引委託者に対する委託者資産の返還に係る債務の円滑な弁済のために必要と判断した」と、「委託者保護基金が」とあるのは「補償基金協会が」と、「委託者保護基金のみ」とあるのは「補償基金協会のみ」と、「委託者保護基金の」とあるのは「補償基金協会の」と、「商品取引員が通知商品取引員に該当することとなった場合その他信託管理人」とあるのは「信託管理人」と、同項第二号中「委託者保護基金に」とあるのは「補償基金協会に」と、「商品取引員が通知商品取引員に該当することとなった場合その他委託者保護基金」とあるのは「補償基金協会」と、「当該委託者保護基金」とあるのは「当該補償基金協会」と、「委託者保護基金の」とあるのは「補償基金協会の」と、同項第三号中「委託者保護基金に」とあるのは「補償基金協会に」と、「委託者保護基金の」とあるのは「補償基金協会の」と、「商品取引員が通知商品取引員に該当することとなった場合その他委託者保護基金」とあるのは「補償基金協会」と、「委託者保護基金は」とあるのは「補償基金協会は」と、同項第四号中「委託者保護基金に」とあるのは「補償基金協会に」と、「委託者保護基金の」とあるのは「補償基金協会の」と、「、委託者保護基金」とあるのは「、補償基金協会」と、「商品取引員が通知商品取引員に該当することとなった場合その他委託者保護基金」とあるのは「補償基金協会」と、「委託者保護基金は」とあるのは「補償基金協会は」と、同条第四項中「委託者保護基金」とあるのは「補償基金協会」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 96-4 The provisions of Article 207 (Contribution of Property Other than Monies), Article 212 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)) (Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount to Be Paid in), Article 213 (excluding paragraph (1), items (i) and (iii)) (Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property contributed), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to any stipulation for the matters listed in Article 92, item (iii); and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for payment under Article 212 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "director" in Article 207, paragraph (10), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director of the converting Mutual Company set forth in Article 86, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 209" and "Article 199, paragraph (1), item (iii)" in Article 207, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 96-2 of the Insurance Business Act" and "Article 92, item (iii) of that Act," respectively; the terms "Article 199, paragraph (1), item (iii)" and "application for subscription for shares for subscription or his/her manifestation of intention relating to the contract provided for in Article 205" in Article 212, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 92, item (iii) of the Insurance Business Act" and "application," respectively; and the term "shareholders having the shares" in Article 847, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholders having the shares (or, where six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) have not lapsed since the Effective Date of an Entity Conversion, persons who had been members from six months prior until the Effective Date of the Entity Conversion and have been holding the shares without interruption since the Effective Date of the Entity Conversion)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第九十六条の四　会社法第二百七条（金銭以外の財産の出資）、第二百十二条（第一項第一号を除く。）（不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任）、第二百十三条（第一項第一号及び第三号を除く。）（出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は第九十二条第三号に掲げる事項を定めた場合について、同法第七編第二章第二節（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第二百十二条（第一項第一号を除く。）の規定による支払を求める訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第二百七条第十項第一号中「取締役」とあるのは「保険業法第八十六条第一項に規定する組織変更をする相互会社の取締役」と、同法第二百十二条第一項第二号中「第二百九条」とあるのは「保険業法第九十六条の二」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「同法第九十二条第三号」と、同条第二項中「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「保険業法第九十二条第三号」と、「申込み又は第二百五条の契約」とあるのは「申込み」と、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「株式を有する株主（組織変更の効力発生日から六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間。以下この項において同じ。）を経過していないときは、六箇月前から当該組織変更の効力発生日まで引き続いて社員であった者であって、当該組織変更の効力発生日から引き続いて株式を有する株主）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Until the date of whichever registration filed under Article 293 of the New Act first becomes effective, with regard to the application of the provisions of Article 98, paragraph 1 and paragraph 4, the term, “a Consignor Protection Fund (limited to a Consignor Protection Fund which said Futures Commission Merchant joined as a Member; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)” in the same Article, paragraph 1, item 1 shall be deemed to be replaced with, “Association of Compensation Funds”; the phrase, “a Futures Commission Merchant becomes a Futures Commission Merchant Subject to a Notice (which means a Futures Commission Merchant Subject to a Notice prescribed in the provisions of Article 304 of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply)” shall be deemed to be replaced with, “the Association of Compensation Funds that is the trust administrator judges it is necessary for the smooth repayment of said Futures Commission Merchant’s debts pertaining to the return of the customer’s assets to a customer”; the term, “a Consignor Protection Fund” shall be deemed to be replaced with, “Association of Compensation Funds”; the phrase, “only the Consignor Protection Fund” shall be deemed to be replaced with, “only the Association of Compensation Funds”; the phrase, “of a Consignor Protection Fund” shall be deemed to be replaced with, “of the Association of Compensation Funds”; the phrase, “when a Futures Commission Merchant becomes a Futures Commission Merchant Subject to a Notice, other trust administrators” shall be deemed to be replaced with, “the trust administrator”; the phrase, “with a Consignor Protection Fund” in the same paragraph, item 2 shall be deemed to be replaced with, “with the Association of Compensation Funds”; the phrase, “when a Futures Commission Merchant becomes a Futures Commission Merchant Subject to a Notice, other Consignor Protection Funds” shall be deemed to be replaced with, “the Association of Compensation Funds”; the phrase, “said Consignor Protection Fund” shall be deemed to be replaced with, “said Association of Compensation Funds”; the phrase, “of the Consignor Protection Fund” shall be deemed to be replaced with, “of the Association of Compensation Funds”; the phrase, “to a Consignor Protection Fund” in the same paragraph, item 3 shall be deemed to be replaced with, “to the Association of Compensation Funds”; the phrase, “of the Consignor Protection Fund” shall be deemed to be replaced with, “of the Association of Compensation Funds”; the phrase, “when a Futures Commission Merchant becomes a Futures Commission Merchant Subject to a Notice, other Consignor Protection Funds” shall be deemed to be replaced with, “the Association of Compensation Funds”; the term, “Consignor Protection Fund” shall be deemed to be replaced with, “Association of Compensation Funds”; the phrase, “to the Consignor Protection Fund” in the same paragraph, item 4 shall be deemed to be replaced with, “to the Association of Compensation Funds”; the phrase, “unless the Consignor Protection Fund” shall be deemed to be replaced with “unless the Association of Compensation Funds”; the term, “by a Consignor Protection Fund” shall be deemed to be replaced with, “by the Association of Compensation Funds”; the phrase, “in the cases where a Futures Commission Merchant becomes a Futures Commission Merchant Subject to a Notice or where a Consignor Protection Fund” shall be deemed to be replaced with “when the Association of Compensation Funds”; the phrase, “Consignor Protection Fund” shall be deemed to be replaced with, “Association of Compensation Funds”; the term, “Consignor Protection Fund” in the same Article, paragraph 4 shall be deemed to be replaced with “Association of Compensation Funds”, respectively.
    新法第二百九十三条の登録のうち最初のものの効力が生じる日までの間は、第九十八 条第一項及び第四項の規定の適用については、同条第一項第一号中「委託者保護基金（当 該商品取引員が会員として加入している委託者保護基金に限る。以下この条において同 じ。）」とあるのは「補償基金協会」と、「商品取引員が通知商品取引員（法第三百四条に 規定する通知商品取引員をいう。以下同じ。）に該当することとなった」とあるのは「信 託管理人である補償基金協会が当該商品取引員の有する取引委託者に対する委託者資産の 返還に係る債務の円滑な弁済のために必要と判断した」と、「委託者保護基金が」とある のは「補償基金協会が」と、「委託者保護基金のみ」とあるのは「補償基金協会のみ」と、 「委託者保護基金の」とあるのは「補償基金協会の」と、「商品取引員が通知商品取引員 に該当することとなった場合その他信託管理人」とあるのは「信託管理人」と、同項第二 号中「委託者保護基金に」とあるのは「補償基金協会に」と、「商品取引員が通知商品取 引員に該当することとなった場合その他委託者保護基金」とあるのは「補償基金協会」と、 「当該委託者保護基金」とあるのは「当該補償基金協会」と、「委託者保護基金の」とあ るのは「補償基金協会の」と、同項第三号中「委託者保護基金に」とあるのは「補償基金 協会に」と、「委託者保護基金の」とあるのは「補償基金協会の」と、「商品取引員が通知 商品取引員に該当することとなった場合その他委託者保護基金」とあるのは「補償基金協 会」と、「委託者保護基金は」とあるのは「補償基金協会は」と、同項第四号中「委託者 保護基金に」とあるのは「補償基金協会に」と、「委託者保護基金の」とあるのは「補償 基金協会の」と、「、委託者保護基金」とあるのは「、補償基金協会」と、「商品取引員が 通知商品取引員に該当することとなった場合その他委託者保護基金」とあるのは「補償基 金協会」と、「委託者保護基金は」とあるのは「補償基金協会は」と、同条第四項中「委 託者保護基金」とあるのは「補償基金協会」と読み替えるものとする。 - 経済産業省
  • (1) In the case where the acquisition costs of the entire property that a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger acquired by succession as the result of an Incorporation-Type Merger (which refers to an Incorporation-Type Merger prescribed in Article 141 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter until Article 60-11) (hereinafter referred to as the "Property subject to an Incorporation-Type Merger") (excluding the property of a Member Commodity Exchange acquired through an Incorporation-Type Merger [which means a single Member Commodity Exchange in the case where the book value immediately prior to an Incorporation-Type Merger for the property held by such single Member Commodity Exchange should be used as the book value of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger for said property; hereinafter the same shall apply]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), the acquisition costs of such property are to be measured by a method calculating the current market value of the consideration of the Incorporation-Type Merger and other current market values of said Property subject to an Incorporation-Type Merger, the amounts set forth in the following items for the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger shall be the amounts set forth in said respective items; provided, however, that this provision shall not apply if it is determined that such amounts are to be prescribed pursuant to the provisions of the following paragraph by the Incorporation-Type Merger contract: (i) the amount of the contributions at the establishment of a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the “Amount of Contributions at Establishment”): the sum total of the amounts set forth in the following: (a) the amount determined by the Member Commodity Exchanges Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of the Incorporation-Type Merger contract (limited to an amount of zero or greater) within the scope of the amount of the net assets subject to the Incorporation-Type Merger (which means the amount calculated by deducting the value placed on the Property subject to the Incorporation-Type Merger [limited to liabilities] from the value placed on the Property subject to the Incorporation-Type Merger [limited to assets] (limited to those inherited from a Member Commodity Exchange acquired through an Incorporation-Type Merger); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph; and in the case such amount is less than zero, the amount shall be zero); (b) the amount determined by the Member Commodity Exchanges Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of the Incorporation-Type Merger contract (limited to an amount of zero or greater) within the scope of the current market value of the consideration of the Incorporation-Type Merger (which means the value of the consideration of the Incorporation-Type Merger calculated by using the current market value of the consideration of the Incorporation-Type Merger or other appropriate method; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article; and limited to those cases pertaining to the contributions of a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger that are delivered to Members of a Member Commodity Exchanges Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger other than a Member Commodity Exchange acquired through an Incorporation-Type - 124 - Merger; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph); (ii) the amount of membership fees at the establishment of a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the "Amount of Membership Fees at Establishment): the amount determined by a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of the Incorporation-Type Merger contract within the scope of the amount calculated by deducting the amount set forth in (c) below, from the sum total of the amounts set forth in (a) and (b) (limited to an amount of zero or greater): (a) the amount of net assets subject to an Incorporation-Type Merger (in the case where said amount of net assets subject to the Incorporation-Type Merger is less than zero, the amount shall be zero); (b) the current market value of the consideration of the Incorporation-Type Merger; (c) the Amount of Contributions at Establishment; (iii) the amount of capital surplus at the establishment of a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the "Amount of Capital Surplus at Establishment"): the amount calculated by deducting the sum total of the amounts set forth in (c) and (d) below, from the sum total of the amounts set forth in (a) and (b): (a) the amount of net assets subject to an Incorporation-Type Merger (in the case where said amount of net assets subject to an Incorporation-Type Merger is less than zero, the amount shall be zero); (b) the current market value of the consideration of the Incorporation-Type Merger; (c) the Amount of Contributions at Establishment; (d) the Amount of Membership Fees at Establishment; (iv) the amount of statutory capital at the establishment of a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the “Amount of Statutory Capital at Establishment”): the amount shall be zero; (v) the amount of accumulated surplus at the establishment of a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the “Amount of Accumulated Surplus at Establishment”): the amount shall be zero (if the amount of the net assets subject to an Incorporation-Type Merger is below zero, the amount shall be said amount of net assets subject to the Incorporation-Type Merger).
    １ 新設合併（法第百四十一条の新設合併をいう。以下第六十条の十一までにおいて同 じ。）により新設合併設立会員商品取引所が承継する財産（以下「新設合併対象財産」 という。）（新設合併取得会員商品取引所（新設合併消滅会員商品取引所のうち、一の会 員商品取引所の有する財産に付された新設合併直前の帳簿価額を当該財産に付すべき新 設合併設立会員商品取引所における帳簿価額とすべき場合における当該一の会員商品取 引所をいう。以下同じ。）の財産を除く。以下この条において同じ。）の全部の取得原価 を新設合併対価（新設合併に際して新設合併設立会員商品取引所が新設合併消滅会員商 品取引所の会員に対して交付する財産をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の時価その 他当該新設合併対象財産の時価を適切に算定する方法をもって測定することとすべき場 合において、新設合併設立会員商品取引所の次の各号に掲げる額は、当該各号に定める 額とする。ただし、新設合併契約により次項の規定によるものと定めたときは、この限 りでない。 一新設合併設立会員商品取引所の設立時の出資金の額（以下「設立時出資金額」とい う。） 次に掲げる額の合計額 イ 新設合併対象純資産額（新設合併対象財産（資産に限る。）に付すべき価額から 新設合併対象財産（負債に限る。）に付すべき価額を減じて得た額（新設合併取得 会員商品取引所から承継するものに係るものに限る。）をいう。以下この項におい て同じ。）（当該額が零未満である場合にあっては、零）の範囲内で、新設合併消滅 会員商品取引所が新設合併契約の定めに従い定めた額（零以上の額に限る。）ロ新設合併対価時価（新設合併対価の時価その他適切な方法により算定された新設 合併対価の価額をいう。以下この条において同じ。）（新設合併設立会員商品取引所 の出資に係るものであって、新設合併取得会員商品取引所以外の新設合併消滅会員 商品取引所の会員に交付するものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）の範囲内で、 新設合併消滅会員商品取引所が新設合併契約の定めに従い定めた額（零以上の額に 限る。） 二新設合併設立会員商品取引所の設立時の加入金の額（以下「設立時加入金額」とい う。） イ及びロに掲げる額の合計額からハに掲げる額を減じて得た額の範囲内で、 新設合併消滅会員商品取引所が新設合併契約の定めに従い定めた額（零以上の額に 限る。） イ新設合併対象純資産額（当該新設合併対象純資産額が零未満である場合にあって は、零）ロ新設合併対価時価 ハ設立時出資金額 三新設合併設立会員商品取引所の設立時の資本剰余金の額（以下「設立時資本剰余金 額」という。） イ新設合併対象純資産額（当該新設合併対象純資産額が零未満である場合にあって は、零）ロ新設合併対価時価 ハ設立時出資金額 ニ設立時加入金額 四新設合併設立会員商品取引所の設立時の法定準備金の額（以下「設立時法定準備金 額」という。） 零 五新設合併設立会員商品取引所の設立時の利益剰余金の額（以下「設立時利益剰余金 額」という。） 零 - 経済産業省
  • Article 52-45-2 The provisions of Subsection 1 of Section 2 of Chapter III of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Article 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Businesses of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Bonds), Article 37(1)(ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3(1)(ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3(3) (Delivery of Document prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6(1) and (2), the proviso to Article 37-6 (4) and Article 37-6(5)(Cancellation by Means of Document), Article 38(i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39(3) and Article 39(5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy) and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured)) (General Rules) shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediary for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. by a Bank Agency. In this case, the term "Financial Instruments Business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "agency service or intermediary service for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the term "Act of Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions (excluding Article 37-6(3)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the terms "intends to conclude" in Article 37-3(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conducts agency service or intermediary service for conclusion of,"; the term "; provided" shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. as defined in Article 2(5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer in advance with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the term "Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc." in Article 37-3(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Bank (meaning an Principal Bank as defined in Article 2(16) of the Banking Act) for which the Bank Agent (meaning a Bank Agent as defined in Article 2(15) of the Banking Act) is acting,"; the terms "Where a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction has been cancelled" and "the customer to pay damages or penalty for the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction beyond the amount designated by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as the amount of fees, remuneration or any other Consideration payable by the customer with regard to that contract for financial instruments transaction (referred to as "Consideration" in the following paragraph) for the period until the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in Article 37-6(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "When he/she has paid money to a Bank as damages or otherwise for cancellation of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. (meaning a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act; the same shall apply in Article 39) made" and "person who canceled the contract to pay money as damages or otherwise for the payment he/she has made to the Bank," respectively; the terms "sales and purchase or any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance or other transactions designated by a Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Securities Investment Trust and Securities Investment Corporations; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39(1)(i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "the customer," "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "make up, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the terms "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(ii) and (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the term "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from such Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from Such Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "that is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of a dispute" in Article 39(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may become a cause of dispute,"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第五十二条の四十五の二　金融商品取引法第三章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第五項（書面による解除）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条の二（最良執行方針等）並びに第四十条の三（分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止）を除く。）（通則）の規定は、銀行代理業者が行う特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結」と、これらの規定（同法第三十七条の六第三項の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「銀行代理業者（銀行法第二条第十五項に規定する銀行代理業者をいう。）の所属銀行（同条第十六項に規定する所属銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十七条の六第三項中「金融商品取引契約の解除があつた場合には」とあるのは「特定預金等契約（銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約をいう。第三十九条において同じ。）の解除に伴い銀行に損害賠償その他の金銭の支払をした場合において」と、「金融商品取引契約の解除までの期間に相当する手数料、報酬その他の当該金融商品取引契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価（次項において「対価」という。）の額として内閣府令で定める金額を超えて当該金融商品取引契約の解除」とあるのは「支払」と、「又は違約金の支払を」とあるのは「その他の金銭の支払を、解除をした者に対し、」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 52-45-2 The provisions of Chapter III, Section 2, Subsection 1 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business activities of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Services or Investment Management, Scope of Subsidiary Business activities of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Services or Investment Advisory and Agency Services, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Corporate Bonds), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Document prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6, paragraphs (1) and (2), the proviso to Article 37-6, paragraph (4) and Article 37-6, paragraph (5) (Cancellation by Means of Document), Article 37-7 (Obligation to Conclude a Contract, etc. with a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Articles 40-2 to 40-5 inclusive (Best Execution Policy, Prohibition of Purchase and Sale, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured, Limitation on Sale and Purchase, etc. of Securities for Professional Investors, Obligation of Notification in Relation to Securities for Professional Investors)) (General Rules) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediary for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. by a Bank Agency. In this case, the term "Financial Instruments Business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "agency or intermediation for the conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the term "Act of Executing a Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in the aforementioned provisions (excluding Article 37-6, paragraph (3)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the terms "wishes to conclude" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "engages in agency or intermediation for the conclusion of"; the term "; provided" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc. in advance, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the term "Financial Instruments Specialist, etc." in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Bank (meaning an Principal Bank as defined in Article 2, paragraph (16) of the Banking Act) for which the Bank Agent (meaning a Bank Agent as defined in Article 2, paragraph (15) of the Banking Act) is acting"; the terms "Where a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction has been cancelled" and "the customer to pay damages or penalty for the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction beyond the amount specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the amount of fees, remuneration or any other Consideration payable by the customer with regard to that contract for Financial Instruments Transaction (referred to as a "Consideration" in the following paragraph) for the period until the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in Article 37-6, paragraph (3) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "When a Financial Instruments Specialist has paid money to a Bank as damages or otherwise for cancellation of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. (meaning a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act; the same shall apply in Article 39) made" and "person who canceled the contract to pay money as damages or otherwise for the payment he/she has made to the Bank," respectively; the terms "purchase and sale or other transactions of Securities (excluding purchase and sale on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Engagement in Trust Business by a Financial Institution; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts purchase and sale of Securities or Derivative Transactions on the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "the customer," "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "make up, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the terms "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the term "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "that is specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may be a potential cause of"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order.
    第五十二条の四十五の二　金融商品取引法第三章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止、社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第五項（書面による解除）、第三十七条の七（指定紛争解決機関との契約締結義務等）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）並びに第四十条の二から第四十条の五まで（最良執行方針等、分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止、特定投資家向け有価証券の売買等の制限、特定投資家向け有価証券に関する告知義務）を除く。）（通則）の規定は、銀行代理業者が行う銀行代理業に係る特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結」と、これらの規定（同法第三十七条の六第三項の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「銀行代理業者（銀行法第二条第十五項に規定する銀行代理業者をいう。）の所属銀行（同条第十六項に規定する所属銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十七条の六第三項中「金融商品取引契約の解除があつた場合には」とあるのは「特定預金等契約（銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約をいう。第三十九条において同じ。）の解除に伴い銀行に損害賠償その他の金銭の支払をした場合において」と、「金融商品取引契約の解除までの期間に相当する手数料、報酬その他の当該金融商品取引契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価（次項において「対価」という。）の額として内閣府令で定める金額を超えて当該金融商品取引契約の解除」とあるのは「支払」と、「又は違約金の支払を」とあるのは「その他の金銭の支払を、解除をした者に対し、」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
＜前へ 1 2 .... 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619

例文データの著作権について