「Phylogeny」の共起表現一覧(1語右で並び替え)
該当件数 : 88件
er shrimp (not a prawn or scampo in terms of | phylogeny, although colloquially "prawn" can refer to |
al adaptation sets the direction of physical | phylogeny and physical heredity is determined in part |
aceae Malpighiaceae - description, taxonomy, | phylogeny, and nomenclature |
The | phylogeny and taxonomy of this clade is poorly underst |
A description of radiation is called a | phylogeny and is often represented by type of diagram |
o economic entomology, zoogeography, and the | phylogeny and metamorphoses of insects. |
His research focus is "the | phylogeny and developmental biology of the cells that |
da) and the spikedaces (genus Meda), but the | phylogeny and indeed the validity of the proposed "pla |
, Bleidorn C, McHugh D, Halanych KM "Annelid | phylogeny and the status of Sipuncula and Echiura" "BM |
unct distributions and the exact patterns of | phylogeny are yet to be determined. |
ni and Oretini, its internal systematics and | phylogeny are not yet well resolved. |
Haeckel's theory of ontogeny recapitulating | phylogeny as an example of an outdated exaggeration. |
Phylogeny based on Horvath et al. (2008) and Orlando e | |
A 1997 analysis attempted to construct a | phylogeny based mainly on larval characteristics. |
stonea within the Arecoideae is uncertain; a | phylogeny based on plastid DNA failed to resolve the p |
ion is widely used in taxonomy and molecular | phylogeny because it a) is (due to the high copy numbe |
macromolecules common to all cells, used in | phylogeny because they change slowly over time. |
use there are many uncertainties about their | phylogeny, but because the major clades of clitellate |
the result of conclusions based on molecular | phylogeny data from the chloroplast genome. |
The Carvalho et al. (2004) paper | phylogeny did not include neosuchians in the analysis. |
elated fields, including microbial taxonomy, | phylogeny, evolution, molecular biodiversity studies, |
Proteobacterial | phylogeny for more on placement |
"A detailed | phylogeny for the Methanomicrobiales". |
In 1835, he developed a | phylogeny for the birds based on the muscles of the hi |
however, genetic research by the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group has shown it to be in a less basal pos |
The Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group treats Fabaceae in the broad sense. |
The Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group determined that splitting this clade o |
ree family (Bombacaceae), but the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group places it in the Malva family (Malvace |
family Salicaceae (following the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group classification). |
ed by scientists working with the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group but is placed in the Grossulariaceae b |
circumscription recognized by the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group (APG) includes Apocynaceae (including |
been merged with Lamiales in the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group system. |
yophyllales as defined before the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group expanded it to include the plants whic |
t more recent studies such as the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group place it in the order Ericales. |
ales, but genetic research by the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group has recently resulted in its being tra |
n flora and he is a member of the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group (that is, he is a contributing author |
Briggs, 1985) is accepted by the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group (APG); Hopkinsiaceae and Lyginiaceae, |
This family was accepted in the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group's 2009 publication of the APG III syst |
and one of the instigators of the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group-classification for flowering plants wh |
but is treated as distinct by the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Group. |
The deep branching of chordate | phylogeny has been clarified by chordate genomics. |
the early 2000's a number of studies on the | phylogeny has reduced the included genera down to thir |
ogenies of organisms, and inconsistencies in | phylogeny have been reported among specific groups of |
3. Evolution ( | Phylogeny): how does the behaviour compare with simila |
The evidence of | phylogeny, however, suggests that the lamprey lineage |
The | phylogeny in this species group is poorly known despit |
and applied to investigate the diversity or | phylogeny in the genus. |
It differs from molecular | phylogeny in that the main goal is not to determine cl |
The current understanding of molluscan | phylogeny is shown below. |
molecular studies, and their position in the | phylogeny is unclear. |
ilkworms even with the most modern molecular | phylogeny methods. |
Phylogeny of genus Hypericum | |
The | phylogeny of the Anurognathidae is uncertain. |
A | phylogeny of Dermaptera and related groups |
2007: Higher-order | phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes |
sequences have been used to investigate the | phylogeny of various groups. |
It is uncertain where in the | phylogeny of the lumbriculids Y. toyensis belongs. |
A | phylogeny of the family, based on DNA sequences was pu |
"The | phylogeny of the ornithischian dinosaurs", Journal of |
ibution of ptaRNA1 is not congruent with the | phylogeny of the host species as it is with other sRNA |
Phylogeny of early Tertiary Carnivora, with a descript | |
A study of the molecular | phylogeny of bishops and widowbirds published in 2008 |
The | phylogeny of the group is complex; with 40,000 species |
nd morphological methods to produce a robust | phylogeny of the genus and its related genera. |
Yates, A.M. & Warren, A.A. (2000) The | phylogeny of the ‘higher' temnospondyls (Vertebrata: C |
Foundation-funded effort to reconstruct the | phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) using gross |
yrtle, bitterbrush, Dryas), revisions to the | phylogeny of angiosperms show a close relatedness of t |
Basin of Romania and shed new lights on the | phylogeny of the genus. |
atory deals with Bunyaviridae (including the | phylogeny of phleboviruses such as Rift Valley fever ( |
less gene has first been used to explore the | phylogeny of the major groups of mammals, and contribu |
Meerow and colleagues published a molecular | phylogeny of the subtribe which found that some specie |
tebrates and contributed to the Tree of Life | phylogeny project. |
can be done by just pressing a few buttons: | phylogeny reconstruction, bootstrap analysis, model se |
ckley et al. (2011) found based on molecular | phylogeny research and shell morphology research, that |
ckley et al. (2011) found based on molecular | phylogeny research and shell morphology research, that |
ckley et al. (2011) found based on molecular | phylogeny research and shell morphology research, that |
superfamily Urocoptoidea based on molecular | phylogeny research. |
rently a good species, as indicated by mtDNA | phylogeny showing two supported clades (Johnson et al. |
In this proposed | phylogeny, Strombus vittatus and Strombus canarium are |
A 2009 molecular | phylogeny study places it in the family Centroplacacea |
Thus, regardless of the uncertain | phylogeny, systematics and taxonomy of its superfamily |
ast, Eric Jones and Shawn Havery published a | phylogeny that did not accord with George's arrangemen |
e Y (WTY) project and added to FTDNA's Draft | phylogeny tree. |
sister to the Bruniaceae, and the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Website proposes incorporating this finding |
e from within Escalloniaceae; the Angiosperm | Phylogeny Website therefore merges these two families |
ive studies should give due consideration to | phylogeny when conducting statistical analyses and dra |
terest in dinosaur - particularly theropod - | phylogeny, which is now far better understood. |
こんにちは ゲスト さん
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると 検索履歴を保存できる! 語彙力診断の実施回数増加! |
こんにちは ゲスト さん
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると 検索履歴を保存できる! 語彙力診断の実施回数増加! |