「In this instance」を含む例文一覧(446)

＜前へ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
  • Article 310-2 In the Tokyo High Court with which an appeal is filed against a final judgment on an action relating to a patent right, etc. that is made by any of the courts specified in the items of Article 6(1) as the court of first instance, a panel of five judges may make an order to the effect that said panel shall conduct a trial and make a judicial decision on that case; provided, however, that this shall not apply to a case pertaining to an appeal to the court of second instance against a final judgment on an action pertaining to a suit transferred pursuant to the provision of Article 20-2(1).
    第三百十条の二　第六条第一項各号に定める裁判所が第一審としてした特許権等に関する訴えについての終局判決に対する控訴が提起された東京高等裁判所においては、当該控訴に係る事件について、五人の裁判官の合議体で審理及び裁判をする旨の決定をその合議体ですることができる。ただし、第二十条の二第一項の規定により移送された訴訟に係る訴えについての終局判決に対する控訴に係る事件については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 199 (1) The reasons for a petition for the acceptance of a final appeal shall be stated by indicating that the judgment of prior instance contains a determination that is inconsistent with precedents rendered by the Supreme Court (or, precedents rendered by the former Supreme Court or those rendered by high courts as the final appellate court or the court of second instance, if there are no precedents rendered by the Supreme Court) or involves material matters concerning the construction of laws and regulations. In this case, the provisions of paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of Article 191 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (3) of Article 312 of the Code) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
    第百九十九条　上告受理の申立ての理由の記載は、原判決に最高裁判所の判例（これがない場合にあっては、大審院又は上告裁判所若しくは控訴裁判所である高等裁判所の判例）と相反する判断があることその他の法令の解釈に関する重要な事項を含むことを示してしなければならない。この場合においては、第百九十一条（法第三百十二条第三項の上告理由の記載の方式）第二項及び第三項の規定を準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (4) With regard to a case for which the oral argument of the second instance or the first instance at a high court has been concluded, a case for which the oral argument of the second instance at a district court has been concluded, or a case for which an agreement has been made on not appealing to a high court against a judgment by a summary court or a judgment of the first instance by a district court, while reserving the right to appeal to the Supreme Court, prior to the enforcement of this Act, the provisions then in force shall remain applicable, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 393, paragraph (3), Article 394, Articles 397 to 399-3 and Article 409-2, paragraph (2) of the New Act and the provisions revising Article 88 of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade and Article 108 of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act.
    ４　この法律の施行前に、高等裁判所の第二審又は第一審の口頭弁論が終結した事件、地方裁判所の第二審の口頭弁論が終結した事件及び簡易裁判所の判決又は地方裁判所の第一審の判決に対して上告をする権利を留保して控訴をしない旨の合意をした事件については、新法第三百九十三条第三項、第三百九十四条、第三百九十七条から第三百九十九条ノ三まで及び第四百九条ノ二第二項の規定並びに私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第八十八条及び中小企業等協同組合法第百八条の改正規定にかかわらず、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) In deciding on the appeal filed against the Metropolitan Court's decision, the provisions of Article 257 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis, with the proviso that in the case of a request to this effect the court of second instance shall also hear the parties orally, except when the appeal was filed against a judgment on a request for review submitted against decisions of the Hungarian Patent Office referred to in Article 85(1)(c) and (d).
    (2) メトロポリタン裁判所の決定に対してなされた上訴に関する判決に当たっては，民事訴訟法第257条の規定を準用する。ただし，第2審裁判所は，その旨の請求がある場合は，当該上訴が第85条(1)(c)及び(d)にいうハンガリー特許庁の決定に対して提出された再審理請求に関する判決に対してなされた場合を除き，当事者を口頭でも聴聞する。 - 特許庁
  • In deciding on the appeal filed against the Metropolitan Court’s decision, the provisions of Article 257 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis, with the proviso that in the case of a request to this effect the court of second instance shall also hear the parties orally, except when the appeal was filed against an order on a request for review submitted against a decision of the Hungarian Patent Office referred to in Article 77(1)(c) and (d).
    メトロポリタン裁判所の決定に対して提起された上訴についての判決にあたっては，民事訴訟法第257条の規定を準用する。ただし，第2審裁判所は，その旨の請求がある場合は，当該上訴が第77条(1)(c)及び(d)にいうハンガリー特許庁の決定に対して提出された再審理請求に関する命令に対して提起された場合を除き，当事者を口頭でも聴聞する。 - 特許庁
  • Article 222-20 (1) With regard to a case that has been tried in an expedited trial procedure and for which the judgment was rendered within one day, with the permission of the presiding judge, the court clerk may omit all or part of the matters to be entered in the trial record that are listed in Article 44, paragraph (1), items (xix) and (xxii); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where an appeal to the court of second instance has been filed.
    第二百二十二条の二十　即決裁判手続によつて審理し、即日判決の言渡しをした事件について、裁判長の許可があるときは、裁判所書記官は、第四十四条第一項第十九号及び第二十二号に掲げる記載事項の全部又は一部を省略することができる。ただし、控訴の申立てがあつた場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) When there are two or more foreign punishments rendered in a final and binding decision with regard to the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer, they shall be enforced as a single instance of assistance punishment. In this case, when all of the foreign punishments are comparable to imprisonment with work, assistance punishment as prescribed in item (i) of the preceding paragraph shall apply, and when any of the foreign punishments is not comparable to imprisonment with work, assistance punishment as prescribed in item (ii) of the preceding paragraph shall apply.
    ２　受入移送犯罪に係る確定裁判において言い渡された外国刑が二以上あるときは、これらを一の共助刑として執行する。この場合における共助刑の種類は、当該外国刑のすべてが懲役に相当する刑であるときは、前項第一号に掲げるものとし、当該外国刑のいずれかが懲役に相当する刑でないときは、同項第二号に掲げるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Appeals shall be substantiated before the authority that handed down the decision, with the submission of new documents, with a different interpretation of the evidence adduced or with questions strictly of law. On verification of the requirements laid down in this Article and in the Single Text on Administrative Procedures (TUPA) of INDECOPI, the competent offices shall allow the appeal and refer the proceedings to the second administrative instance.
    審判は，新たな書面証拠，提出した証拠の異別の解釈又は純法律的問題点を提出若しくは提起して，決定を行った所轄当局に対して提起するものとする。所轄当局は本法及びINDECOPIの手続規則(TUPA)に規定する要件の充足を審査し，要件が具備されていることを確認した場合は，審判を行政的第2審手続に付す。 - 特許庁
  • In this instance, from discrimination information for specifying the kind of the IC inlet 106b into which information is to be written from now on by the wireless communication part 110, a corresponding level setting signal is acquired, and the acquired level setting signal is input into the wireless communication part 110, and the written output is automatically corrected in accordance with the temperature characteristics of the IC inlet 106b.
    この際、これから無線通信部１１０に情報の書き込みをさせようとするＩＣインレット１０６ｂの種類を特定する識別情報から対応するレベル設定信号を求め、求めたレベル設定信号を無線通信部１１０に入力してその書き込み出力をＩＣインレット１０６ｂの温度特性に応じて自動補正するようにした。 - 特許庁
  • In this digital broadcasting receiver using MPEG-4 for instance as an encoding system, a memory part 22A storing message information for substituting reception multi-media information beforehand is provided and also a main control part 21A is provided with a means 21a for deciding the reproducing state of the reception multi-media information in a decoding part 24 and a first changeover control means 21b.
    符号化方式として例えばＭＰＥＧ−４を使用したディジタル放送受信装置において、受信マルチメディア情報に代わるメッセージ情報が予め記憶されたメモリ部２２Ａを設けると共に、主制御部２１Ａにデコード部２４における受信マルチメディア情報の再生状態を判定する手段２１ａと、第１の切替制御手段２１ｂとを設ける。 - 特許庁
  • This cable-towing guide, used when a cable is towed in a hole (for instance a handhole 10) of a cable installation section, has a 1st guide 20 placed near the opening of a cable conduit 14 in the hole and a 2nd guide 70 placed on the opening edge of the hole structure on a side opposite to the side of the opening of the cable conduit 14.
    ケーブル布設区間にあるホール（例えばハンドホール１０）の個所においてケーブルを牽引する際に使用するケーブル牽引用ガイドであって、前記ホール内におけるケーブル布設管路１４の開口近くに配置される第１ガイド２０と、そのケーブル布設管路１４の開口とは反対側のホール躯体の開口縁に配置される第２ガイド７０とを備えている。 - 特許庁
  • On the other hand, if the display screen is configured, e.g., in a manner where consumers have to move from the online contract screen to the license agreement screen using a difficult to locate link; the assent of the consumer to the license agreement is not required for clicking the Purchase Button. Under such circumstances, the license agreement is not formed even if the consumer clicks the Purchase Button. Therefore, the consumer may demand a refund in this instance.
    しかし、例えば、オンライン契約画面からリンクでライセンス契約画面に移行するような場合においてリンクが発見しづらく、かつ購入ボタンのクリックに際してライセンス契約についての同意が必要とされない場合等は、購入ボタンがクリックされていたとしても、ライセンス契約が成立しておらず、ユーザーは返金を求めることができると考えられる。 - 経済産業省
  • This free-space, for instance, a through-the-air, optical data link 14 provides a tether-less, for example, no bundles of physical wires or optical fibers, essentially electromagnetically immune, no interference as in radio frequency wireless transmissions, and scalable solution to transmit data to create an MR image.
    この自由空間（例えば、空中経由）光学データリンク（１４）は、ＭＲ画像の作成に使用可能な送信データに対する、無コード式（すなわち、物理的なワイヤや光ファイバの束がない）であり、電磁気に関して本質的に無影響（無線周波数ワイヤレス伝送の様な干渉がない）でありかつスケーラブルな解決法を提供することができる。 - 特許庁
  • This reception part used in the communication equipment (mobile machine equipment, for instance) of the CDMA system is provided with a measurement part 201 for measuring the error rate of reception signals and outputting the measured error rate and means (202 and 203) for detecting the path timing to perform reception and controlling an updating cycle corresponding to the size of the measured error rate.
    受信信号の誤り率を計測し、計測された誤り率を出力する計測部２０１と、この計測された誤り率の大小に応じて、受信すべきパスタイミングの検出及び更新周期を制御する手段（２０２、２０３）とを有する、ＣＤＭＡシステムの通信装置（例えば移動機装置）に用いられる受信部。 - 特許庁
  • At this point, the wavelength light of a color (red, green or blue) different for each reflective display area can be made to resonate, thereby color display in the reflective display area is brightened without thinning a color filter, for instance, by the light having the resonating wavelength.
    このとき、反射層５１と反射層５２との間の距離に応じて、反射表示領域毎に異なる色（赤色、緑色、あるいは青色）の波長光を共振させることができるので、共振した波長を有する光によって、例えばカラーフィルタを薄くすることなく反射表示領域におけるカラー表示を明るくすることができる。 - 特許庁
  • However, if, for instance, formalistic standards are applied in a strict manner to assess the growth of a company in a certain period of time after it is listed and if the results are used to decide, say, whether it should be delisted, that might lead to an unhelpful focus revenues and/or profits, resulting in more cases of window-dressing, unreasonable mergers, and the like. To avoid this, careful examination should be conducted on what criteria should be laid down for review of growth after listing, how the review should be conducted, and in what manner its results should be dealt with.
    但し、例えば、上場後一定期間経過後に形式基準で厳格に成長性評価を行い、その結果によっては上場廃止等を行うことは、売上高・収益数値至上主義を招き、粉飾会計や不必要な合併等をこれまで以上に増加させる可能性がある。こうした観点から、上場後の成長性審査の基準の設定や審査方法、審査結果の取扱いには、しっかりした検討を行うことが必要である。 - 経済産業省
  • (a) Applicants, their attorneys or agents are required to conduct their business with the Office with politeness, decorum, and courtesy. Applicants who act or persist in acting in violation of this rule, shall be required to be represented by attorney, and papers presented containing matter in violation of this rule will be submitted to the Director and returned to the sender, by his direct order. (b) Complaints against Examiners to be on Separate Paper. -- Complaints against Examiners and other officers must be made in a communication separate from other papers, and will be promptly investigated by or at the instance of the Director.
    (a)出願人又はその代理人は，礼節をもって庁と業務を行うことが要求される。本条規則に違反して行動し，又は行動することに固執する出願人は，代理人による代理が要求され，本条規則に違反する事項の記載がある提出書類は局長に提出され，その直接命令により，差出人に返還される。 (b)審査官に対する不服申立は別個の書類で行うこと 審査官及び他の上級職員に対する不服申立は，他の書類とは別個の通信においてなされなければならず，かつ，局長により又は局長の指示に基づいて速やかに調査される。 - 特許庁
  • The problem is solved by controlling a field current in addition to the control of a stator current, and by determining a stator current command value and a field current command value for this control so as to generate torque complying with a torque command value and to satisfy reasonable evaluation standards (standards for minimizing loss, widening operation range, and the like, for instance) specified by a designer.
    固定子電流の制御に加えて、界磁電流を制御するようにし、このための固定電流指令値と界磁電流指令値とを、トルク指令値に合致した発生トルクをもたらすと共に、設計者が指定した合理的評価基準（例えば、損失の最小、運転領域の拡大などの基準）を満足するように決定することにより、課題を解決した。 - 特許庁
  • This equipment is provided, for instance, with a means for laying the mask for screen printing on the surface to be printed, a means for filling the printing material in a space set by the surface to be printed whereon the mask for screen printing is laid and by the opening, and a means for separating the masks sequentially after the filling operation by the filling means.
    このスクリーン印刷装置は、例えば、前記スクリーン印刷用のマスクと被印刷面とを重ねる手段と、前記スクリーン印刷用のマスクが重ねられた被印刷面と前記開口とによって規定される空間に印刷材料を充填する充填手段と、前記充填手段による充填動作の後に、前記各マスクを順次分離する分離手段と、を備える。 - 特許庁
  • The causes for this are said to be that listing foreign companies in Japan requires, for instance, that the accounting reports for the last five periods be disclosed in the Japanese language and based on Japanese accounting standards unless otherwise approved by the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency as foreign accounting standards that adequately protect the public interest or investors and that the financial industry, law and accounting firms, and related businesses lack human resources, in addition to the worldwide trend of eliminating cross listing and the slowdown in Japan’s economic growth.
    その理由として、世界的な重複上場解消の流れや我が国の経済成長の落ち込み等に加え、例えば外国企業の上場にあたって過去5期分の会計報告についての日本語での開示義務があること、金融長官が公益または投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして認めた外国会計基準を除き、日本の会計基準での開示が求められていること、金融産業や法律事務所、会計事務所等の人材不足等の課題が指摘されている。 - 経済産業省
  • The 16 status of residence categories ranging from "diplomat" to "skilled labor" which grant the permission to work to the extent stipulated by the Immigration Act are generally referred to as "specialized and technical fields." However, of these foreigners working in specialized and technical fields, foreign workers possessing knowledge or skills that are, for instance, so that advanced countries must vie with each other to acquire those people with specialized knowledge or skills are defined as "highly-skilled human resources" in this White Paper. The same definition applies to "highly-skilled foreign human resources" whenever it appears in the White Paper.
    定められた範囲内で就労が認められている在留資格である「外交」から「技能」までの16種類を一般に「専門的・技術的分野」と呼ぶが、専門的・技術的分野で就労する外国人のうち、例えば、各国がその専門的な知識や技術の獲得を争うような、より高度な知識や技術を有する外国人労働者を、本白書では「高度人材」と定義する。「高度な外国人材」等と表記している部分も同義である。 - 経済産業省
  • (v) the filing of a final appeal or a petition for acceptance of a final appeal, or the filing of an appeal under the provisions of Article 330 or Article 336, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure or a petition for permission to appeal under the provisions of Article 337, paragraph (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure which are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 25 of the Non-Contentious Case Procedure Act (Act No. 14 of 1898), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 42, paragraph (1) of the Land and Building Lease Act, against a judicial decision made on a petition or application set forth in the preceding item: the fact that a judicial decision of dismissal without prejudice made by the court of prior instance (in the case of the filing of a petition for permission to appeal, the court with which such petition has been filed; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) has become final and binding, or the withdrawal prior to the court of prior instance sending the case to the final appellate court or the court in charge of the appeal.
    五　上告の提起若しくは上告受理の申立て又は前号の申立て若しくは申出についての裁判に対する借地借家法第四十二条第一項において準用する非訟事件手続法（明治三十一年法律第十四号）第二十五条において準用する民事訴訟法第三百三十条若しくは第三百三十六条第一項の規定による抗告の提起若しくは第三百三十七条第二項の規定による抗告の許可の申立て　原裁判所（抗告の許可の申立てにあつては、その申立てを受けた裁判所。以下この号において同じ。）における却下の裁判の確定又は原裁判所が上告裁判所若しくは抗告裁判所に事件を送付する前における取下げ - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • As of today, there is no fact of such a decision having been made with the METI. My opinion is that any decision on the application of law has to be made on strictly an individual, case-by-case basis and, seeing as, among other points, cash advances vary in terms of, for instance, the type of transaction, parties involved and the form of awareness, so one cannot, at this time, make a broad reference to their legality as a generalized view encompassing a money lending business perspective.
    本日、ご指摘のような決定を経済産業省との間に決定した事実はございません。法の適用はあくまで個別の判断によらざるを得ず、現金化については取引類型や関係者の関与、認識の形態が様々である等から、貸金業を含め一般論としての法律上の成否を現時点で一概に申し上げることはできないと考えております。 - 金融庁
  • This catalyst deterioration detection device of an internal combustion engine is provided with: a means S102 measuring oxygen storage capacity of a catalyst arranged in an exhaust passage of the internal combustion engine; and a means S106 executing gas flow velocity restraint control (for instance, exhaust valve opening timing retarding control) for restraining the flow velocity of an exhaust gas flowing into the catalyst during the oxygen storage capacity measurement (S103: NO).
    本発明にかかる内燃機関の触媒劣化検出装置は、内燃機関の排気通路に配置された触媒の酸素吸蔵容量を計測する手段（Ｓ１０２）と、この酸素吸蔵容量計測中（Ｓ１０３：ＮＯ）に触媒に流入する排気ガスの流速を抑制するためのガス流速抑制制御（例えば排気弁開タイミング遅角制御）を実行する手段（Ｓ１０６）とを備える。 - 特許庁
  • Furthermore, cross-holdings between listed companies may possibly affect their management and therefore information concerning such cross-holdings are important for investors when making investment decisions. This is because, through the ownership of shares, market price fluctuations may, for instance, affect the financial conditions of the listed companies, or the cross-holding leads to a business relationship that is not contained in the contractual relationships and control structures captured by the financial statements.
    また、上場会社等の間での持合いは、株式の保有を通じて、例えば、市況変動が上場会社等の財務内容に影響を与え、又は、従来、財務諸表等で捉えられてきた契約や支配関係では表れないようなビジネス上の関係となり、上場会社等の経営に影響を及ぼし得るものであることから、その状況は、投資者の投資判断に際して重要な情報である。 - 金融庁
  • - for there could be no doubt whatever that, in this instance, I did actually hear (although from what direction it proceeded I found it impossible to say) a low and apparently distant, but harsh, protracted, and most unusual screaming or grating sound - the exact counterpart of what my fancy had already conjured up for the dragon's unnatural shriek as described by the romancer.
    ——というのは、この瞬間に、低い、明らかに遠くからの、しかし鋭い、長びいた、まったく異様な、叫ぶようなまたは軋るような音——この物語の作者の書きしるした竜の不思議な叫び声として私がすでに空想で思い浮べていたものとまさしくそっくりな物音——を実際に聞いた（もっともどちらの方向からということは言えなかったが）ことは、なんの疑いもなかったからである。 - Edgar Allan Poe『アッシャー家の崩壊』
  • (2) Family court research law clerks shall, in each Family Court, conduct necessary research for the trial and decision and conciliation referred to in Article 31-3, paragraph 1, item 1, for judicial decision referred to in item 2 of the same paragraph (limited to the judicial decision related to incidental disposition referred to in Article 32, paragraph 1 of Act for Personal Status and judicial decisions of designation of the person who has parental authority under paragraph3 of the same article (hereinafter referred to as the "Judicial Decision for Incidental Disposition") in this paragraph)), as well as for the trail and decision referred to in Article 31-3, paragraph 1, item 3, and any other affairs prescribed by other laws; and in each High Court, conduct the necessary research for proceeding of appeal from decisions referred to in item 1 of the same paragraph, and for proceeding of appeal trial at the court of second instance pertaining to Judicial Decision for Incidental Disposition.
    ２　家庭裁判所調査官は、各家庭裁判所においては、第三十一条の三第一項第一号の審判及び調停、同項第二号の裁判（人事訴訟法第三十二条第一項の附帯処分についての裁判及び同条第三項の親権者の指定についての裁判（以下この項において「附帯処分等の裁判」という。）に限る。）並びに第三十一条の三第一項第三号の審判に必要な調査その他他の法律において定める事務を掌り、各高等裁判所においては、同項第一号の審判に係る抗告審の審理及び附帯処分等の裁判に係る控訴審の審理に必要な調査を掌る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 198 In circumstances where the final appellate court has received a case that has been sent by the court of prior instance, if the final appellate court does not issue an order to dismiss the final appeal without prejudice under the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 317 (Dismissal of Final Appeal without Prejudice by Final Appellate Court, etc.) of the Code or an order to dismiss the final appeal with prejudice under the provision of paragraph (2) of said Article, it shall serve a duplicate of the statement of the reasons for the final appeal to the appellee of the final appeal; provided, however, that this shall not apply if the final appellate court finds that such service is unnecessary in cases of conducting proceedings and making a judicial decision without oral argument.
    第百九十八条　上告裁判所が原裁判所から事件の送付を受けた場合において、法第三百十七条（上告裁判所による上告の却下等）第一項の規定による上告却下の決定又は同条第二項の規定による上告棄却の決定をしないときは、被上告人に上告理由書の副本を送達しなければならない。ただし、上告裁判所が口頭弁論を経ないで審理及び裁判をする場合において、その必要がないと認めるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 1 With regard to the expediting of trials, since it is essential to conduct trials expeditiously under fair, appropriate and adequate proceedings in order for rights and interests to be properly realized through the judiciary, and for all other roles required of the judiciary to be fulfilled, and in addition, in line with the changes in social and economic conditions both in Japan and abroad, since there is an urgent need to respond to requests from the people for trials to be conducted expeditiously, the objective of this Act shall be to further expedite the overall proceedings of the courts, including the litigation proceedings in the first instance by providing for the purpose, responsibility of the state and other basic matters, which accordingly will contribute to realizing a judicial system that responds to the expectations of the people.
    第一条　この法律は、司法を通じて権利利益が適切に実現されることその他の求められる役割を司法が十全に果たすために公正かつ適正で充実した手続の下で裁判が迅速に行われることが不可欠であること、内外の社会経済情勢等の変化に伴い、裁判がより迅速に行われることについての国民の要請にこたえることが緊要となっていること等にかんがみ、裁判の迅速化に関し、その趣旨、国の責務その他の基本となる事項を定めることにより、第一審の訴訟手続をはじめとする裁判所における手続全体の一層の迅速化を図り、もって国民の期待にこたえる司法制度の実現に資することを目的とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 390 The accused need not appear at the trial at the court of second instance; provided, however, that for offenses other than those punishable by a fine not exceeding 500,000 yen (50,000 yen for offenses other than those prescribed in the Penal Code, the Law concerning Punishment of Physical Violence and Others and the Act on Penal Provisions related to Economic Activities, until otherwise stipulated) or a petty fine, the court may order him/her to appear when it deems this to be essential for the protection of his/her rights.
    第三百九十条　控訴審においては、被告人は、公判期日に出頭することを要しない。ただし、裁判所は、五十万円（刑法、暴力行為等処罰に関する法律及び経済関係罰則の整備に関する法律の罪以外の罪については、当分の間、五万円）以下の罰金又は科料に当たる事件以外の事件について、被告人の出頭がその権利の保護のため重要であると認めるときは、被告人の出頭を命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • The name "Kendo" seems to have been established in or around the end of Meiji period to the early Taisho period, as it recorded that Dai Nippon Butoku Kai, which was established in 1899 to restore Bujutsu, using examples from Jujutsu versus Judo of the Kodokan Judo Institute, established the Kendo name in around 1919 so that Kenjutsu and Gekken, which were handed down from the Edo period, would be introduced into physical education in the school system by changing the training methods and making it a form of mental training such as Yamato-gokoro (Japanese spirit) (Yamato-damashii [Japanese spirit]) (a poem of Sasaburo TAKANO describes, "Kendo is a God-instructed way; this technique refines Yamato-gokoro") (the term "Kendo" was used by some schools as early as the Edo period; for instance, Abe-tate densho (book) in 1667 described that since Kenjutsu was for daily use the name of Kendo would be used).
    呼称は、柔術に対する講道館の柔道を参考に、明治32年に武術再興のため設立した大日本武徳会が江戸時代以来の剣術や撃剣を学校の体育教育に採用できるよう稽古法を改め、大和心（大和魂）など精神修行とする（高野佐三郎の歌にも「剣道は神の教えの道なればやまと心をみがくこの技」とある）ため、名称を大正8年（1919年）ごろ剣道としたという記録に残っており、明治末から大正初期ごろに成立したものらしい（なお剣道という用語は、例えば寛文7年（1667年）安倍立伝書に剣術は日用の術なので剣道という号にするという表現がみえるなど、江戸時代にも流派によっては使われたこともある）。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • This brings us (FSA) to the question of staffing. The question cannot be solved simply by increasing the staff size. For instance, when I visited the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) the other day, I asked them a favor in which I basically requested them to receive a small number of our staff to let them gain hands-on experience in the field. They did give me a "let's do it" answer, but it is actually quite hard to do, given the large gap in pay.
    だから、うち（金融庁）も人員をどう…。職員の人員増だけでは片がつかないのですよ、これ。（だから）といって、この間も、私が東証を見に行ったときにも、とにかく「うち（金融庁）の人材を少し受け取ってあれしてくれ」みたいなことをお願いしたら、「そういうふうにやりましょう」みたいなお話もしたのですけれども、なかなか難しいのですよね、給料が違いますから。待遇が違う（という）問題があるでしょう。民間（東証）のそういう人たちを金融庁が受け入れるといったって、給料が違いますし、反対に、金融庁から行った人がまた帰ってくるけれども、給料が上がったら、またガクンと下がることも起きてくることありますしね。 - 金融庁
  • Over the past decade, systems and institutions for ventures have been greatly developed. For instance, emerging equity exchanges were opened, minimum capital requirements for joint-stock companies were abolished, and systems for financing without the need for collateral or a guarantor were introduced. During the global IT boom around 2000, many IT service-related start-ups also came into the spotlight in Japan. In the country as a whole, however, the opening rate of establishments (the proportion of start-ups among existing businesses) stood at 5.1% (2004 - 2006), smaller than the closing rate (the proportion of discontinued companies among existing businesses) of 6.2%. This has also stayed at a lower level than that in the United States (10.2%), the United Kingdom (10.0%), and France (12.1%). (The year of reference is 2004 for all three countries).
    この10年間、新興株式市場の整備や株式会社最低資本金規制の撤廃、新規創業者に対する無担保・無保証人融資制度の整備など、ベンチャー企業を取り巻く制度整備は大きく進展し、2000年頃には世界的なＩＴブームに乗って我が国でも多くのＩＴ・サービス系ベンチャー企業が注目されたが、我が国全体として見ると、開業率（新規開業企業数の現時点企業数に占める割合）は、5.1%（2004年～2006年）と、廃業率（廃業企業数の現時点企業数に占める割合）の6.2%を下回っており、米国(10.2%）、英国(10.0%）、フランス(12.1%）（米国、英国、フランスはいずれも2004年データ）と比して低水準にとどまっている。 - 経済産業省
  • In Japan, isobutane is used as a refrigerant instead of fluorocarbon refrigerants. Isobutane is flammable, and so there are many precautions taken to prevent accidents. For instance, refrigerator piping which used to be welded, has been changed to a seamless pipe to prevent gas leakages. Moreover, defroster heaters, which used to be in singlelayer tubes, are now in double-layer tubes, so that surface temperatures never get higher than the combustion point. These forward technologies support the use of nonfluorocarbon. For other refrigeration equipment, such as convenience store show cases, non-fluorocarbon products using carbon dioxide are already in practical use. Also, non-fluorocarbon, energy-efficient automatic vending machines are now in use on the street all over this country. Most of these non-fluorocarbon equipment are recently put in practical use, so they are not wide-spread yet. However, the government is promoting the technical development and installation of non-fluorocarbon facilities and equipment with financial incentives.
    日本では冷媒フロンの替わりにイソブタンを使用。可燃性ガスのイソブタンは、漏れると発火する危険性があるため、安全性を確保するための様々な工夫を行ってきました。従来溶接していた冷却器の配管は、イソブタンの漏洩を防ぐため繋ぎ目を無くしました。更に、１枚のガラス管に入れていた霜取りヒーターを二重のガラス管の中に入れることによって、表面温度をイソブタンの発火点より低く抑え発火を防ぐなど、高い技術力を駆使しノンフロン化に成功したのです。他の冷凍空調機器では、コンビニにおけるショーケースでも、二酸化炭素を冷媒としたノンフロン製品が実用化されており、また、自動販売機にも、ノンフロン・省エネ機があります。これらのノンフロン機器は、まだ一部が実用化されたばかりでその普及はこれからですが、国の補助を用い、ノンフロンの施設や設備の技術開発や導入等の促進がされています。 - 経済産業省
  • Article 19 (1) The court of first instance, even where a suit is subject to its jurisdiction, upon the petition of a party and with the consent of the opponent, shall transfer the whole or part of the suit to the district court or summary court pertaining to the petition; provided, however, that this shall not apply where the transfer would substantially delay the court proceedings or where the petition is other than a petition for transfer from a summary court to the district court that has jurisdiction over the location thereof and it is filed after the defendant has presented oral arguments on the merits or made statements in preparatory proceedings.
    第十九条　第一審裁判所は、訴訟がその管轄に属する場合においても、当事者の申立て及び相手方の同意があるときは、訴訟の全部又は一部を申立てに係る地方裁判所又は簡易裁判所に移送しなければならない。ただし、移送により著しく訴訟手続を遅滞させることとなるとき、又はその申立てが、簡易裁判所からその所在地を管轄する地方裁判所への移送の申立て以外のものであって、被告が本案について弁論をし、若しくは弁論準備手続において申述をした後にされたものであるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • The subject of the financial regulatory reforms has already been a significant discussion topic in the past as well. I heard that during the Financial Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting held from October 22 to 23 in Gyeongju, the proposed capital adequacy requirement for banks and a new liquidity framework, which were drawn up in a recent meeting of the Group of Governors and Heads of Supervision, were welcomed along with the commitment to having them come into full force by the prescribed due date, and an endorsement was given to the policy framework, work processes and timelines proposed by the Basel Committee on Banking, one of the subordinate organs of the Financial Stability Board, with respect to the issue of addressing systematically important financial institutions (SIFIs) that you have just raised. The meeting accordingly agreed to give priority to this initiative as an agenda item of the G20 Summit. In that sense, implementing international financial regulatory reforms will contribute to an enhanced financial system and improved soundness of financial institutions in the medium to long term. In the meantime, it is also extremely important to, among other things, make the set of requirements a well-balanced one that fully takes into account differences between countries in terms of the actual operation of their financial systems and to implement it over time by, for instance, allowing an ample planning time in adequate consideration of any impact on the real economy - this is also an approach that Japan applies in attending the ongoing Summit meeting.
    金融規制改革に関しましては、以前にも大きな話題になりました10月22日から23日は慶州でありました財務大臣・中央銀行総裁会議において、先般の中央銀行総裁・銀行監督当局長官との会合で作成された銀行の自己資本、それから流動性の新たな枠組みを歓迎し、期限内に完全に実施することにコミットすること、また今お話がございましたシステム上重要な金融機関（SIFIs）については、FSB（金融安定理事会）、この下部機関の一つにバーゼル銀行監督委員会がありますが、これが提案する政策の枠組み及び作業手順及び日程を承認することを聞いておりまして、G20サミットの議題として、そのことを優先することを合意したところでございまして、そういった意味で国際的な金融規制の改革については、中長期的に金融システムの強化及び金融機関の健全性の向上に資するものとなる一方、各国の金融システムの実情の違いを十分に踏まえたバランスのとれたものにすること、実体経済への影響に十分配慮し、十分な計画期間を設けるなど、時間をかけて実施していくことなどが極めて重要であり、今回のサミットにおいてもこうした姿勢で臨んでいます。 - 金融庁
  • (2) The provisions of Article 186 (Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Appeal to Court of Second Instance), Article 187 (Prepayment of Expenses in Cases of Filing Final Appeal), Article 189 (Service of Written Notice of the Filing of Final Appeal) and Article 192 to the preceding Article (Indication of Precedents; Matter in Which Reasons for Final Appeal Should be Stated; Period for Submission of Statement of Reasons for Final Appeal; Number of Copies of Document Stating Reasons for Final Appeal; Order to Correct; Sending of Case to Final Appellate Court; and Service of Statement of Reasons for Final Appeal) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition for the acceptance of a final appeal. In this case, the term "written notice of the filing of a final appeal" in Article 187, Article 189 and Article 194 shall be deemed to be replaced with "written notice of a petition for the acceptance of a final appeal," the term "appellee of the final appeal" in paragraph (2) of Article 189, Article 195 and the preceding Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "opponent," and the phrase "Article 190 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (2) of Article 312 of the Code) or Article 191 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (3) of Article 312 of the Code)" in paragraph (1) of Article 196 shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1) of Article 199 (Petition for Acceptance of Final Appeal)."
    ２　第百八十六条（控訴の規定の準用）、第百八十七条（上告提起の場合における費用の予納）、第百八十九条（上告提起通知書の送達等）及び第百九十二条から前条まで（判例の摘示、上告理由の記載の仕方、上告理由書の提出期間、上告理由を記載した書面の通数、補正命令、上告裁判所への事件送付及び上告理由書の送達）の規定は、上告受理の申立てについて準用する。この場合において、第百八十七条、第百八十九条及び第百九十四条中「上告提起通知書」とあるのは「上告受理申立て通知書」と、第百八十九条第二項、第百九十五条及び前条中「被上告人」とあるのは「相手方」と、第百九十六条第一項中「第百九十条（法第三百十二条第一項及び第二項の上告理由の記載の方式）又は第百九十一条（法第三百十二条第三項の上告理由の記載の方式）」とあるのは「第百九十九条（上告受理の申立て）第一項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 209 The provisions of Article 186 (Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Appeal to Court of Second Instance), Article 187 (Prepayment of Expenses in Cases of Filing Final Appeal), Article 189 (Service of Written Notice of the Filing of Final Appeal, etc.), Article 192 (Indication of Precedents), Article 193 (Manner in Which Reasons for Final Appeal Should be Stated), Article 195 (Number of Copies of Document Stating Reasons for Final Appeal), Article 196 (Order to Correct) and paragraph (1) of Article 199 (Petition for Acceptance of Final Appeal) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the petition set forth in paragraph (2) of Article 337 (Appeal with Permission) of the Code, the provision of Article 200 (Order to Accept Final Appeal) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases of giving permission under the provision of paragraph (2) of Article 337 of the Code, and the provision of the preceding Article (Special Appeal against Ruling to the Supreme Court) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where permission was given under the provision of paragraph (2) of Article 337 of the Code. In this case, the term "written notice of the filing of a final appeal" in Article 187 and Article 189 shall be deemed to be replaced with "written notice of a petition for permission for an appeal against ruling."
    第二百九条　第百八十六条（控訴の規定の準用）、第百八十七条（上告提起の場合における費用の予納）、第百八十九条（上告提起通知書の送達等）、第百九十二条（判例の摘示）、第百九十三条（上告理由の記載の仕方）、第百九十五条（上告理由を記載した書面の通数）、第百九十六条（補正命令）及び第百九十九条（上告受理の申立て）第一項の規定は、法第三百三十七条（許可抗告）第二項の申立てについて、第二百条（上告受理の決定）の規定は、法第三百三十七条第二項の規定による許可をする場合について、前条（特別抗告）の規定は、法第三百三十七条第二項の規定による許可があった場合について準用する。この場合において、第百八十七条及び第百八十九条中「上告提起通知書」とあるのは、「抗告許可申立て通知書」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (4) The provisions of Article 116(3), (4), (6), and (7) (Dissenting Shareholders' Share Purchase Demand), Article 117(2) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Price of Shares), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of a Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Demands for the Purchase of Preferred Equity made by the Preferred Equity Members of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "act in any item of paragraph (1)" in Article 116(3) and (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "change to the Asset Securitization Plan," the phrases "the day when such act becomes effective," "of the shares provided for in each item of that paragraph," and "such act" in Article 116(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the day of the Resolution for Changing the Plan set forth in Article 153(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," "thereof," and "changes to the Asset Securitization Plan," respectively, the phrases "of the shares" in Article 117(2) and (6) of the Companies Act and "for such shares" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "of the Preferred Equity," the term "share certificates" in Article 117(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Securities," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    ４　会社法第百十六条第三項、第四項、第六項及び第七項（反対株主の株式買取請求）、第百十七条第二項から第六項まで（株式の価格の決定等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資社員による優先出資買取請求について準用する。この場合において、同法第百十六条第三項及び第七項中「第一項各号の行為」とあるのは「資産流動化計画の変更」と、同条第三項中「当該行為が効力を生ずる日」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百五十三条第二項に規定する計画変更決議の日」と、「同項各号に定める株式の」とあるのは「その」と、「当該行為を」とあるのは「当該資産流動化計画の変更を」と、同法第百十七条第二項、第五項及び第六項中「株式の」とあるのは「優先出資の」と、同項中「、株券」とあるのは「、優先出資証券」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 163 The provisions of Article 824 (Dissolution Order for a Company), Article 826 (Duty of a Government Agency, etc. to Give Notice to the Minister of Justice), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xiii)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), Article 904 (Participation of the Minister of Justice), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by Juridical Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the dissolution order for a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 825 (Temporary Restraining Order Concerning Property of a Company), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), Article 905 (Special Provisions on a Temporary Restraining Order Concerning Property of a Company), and Article 906 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the preservation of properties of a Specific Purpose Company in cases where a petition under Article 824(1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article has been filed. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第百六十三条　会社法第八百二十四条（会社の解散命令）、第八百二十六条（官庁等の法務大臣に対する通知義務）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第十三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）、第九百四条（法務大臣の関与）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第三号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の解散の命令について、同法第八百二十五条（会社の財産に関する保全処分）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）並びに第九百五条及び第九百六条（会社の財産に関する保全処分についての特則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百二十四条第一項の申立てがあった場合における特定目的会社の財産の保全について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (1) A trademark or application therefor may belong pro indiviso to two or more persons. The resulting common property shall be governed by the terms of agreement between the parties, failing that by the provisions of this section and, in the final instance, by the provisions of common law on common ownership of property. The granting of licenses and the independent use of the trademark by each participant shall be agreed in accordance with Article 398 of the Civil Code. Each participant may by his own means take civil and criminal action to protect a trademark but shall make appropriate notification to the other joint owners so that they may be party to such action and contribute to the payment of the expenses incurred. In the case of transfer of a trademark or a share, a participant may exercise his right of prior purchase within a period of one month from the time when he was notified of the purpose of and conditions for the implementation of the transfer. Where prior notification is not given or if a transfer is made in a manner different from that provided for in such notification, a participant may exercise his right to withhold his share, within the same period, from the time of publication of the recording of the transfer in the Register of Trademarks. Such absolute and unjustified opposition of a participant to the use of a trademark as might cause the trademark to be declared lapsed shall be deemed, for all purposes, to constitute renunciation of his right.
    (1) 商標又はその出願は，2以上の者に共通して帰属することができる。結果としての共通財産は，当事者間の契約条件により，また当該契約が存在しない場合は本項の規定に従い，かつ最終的には財産の共通所有に関するコモンローの規定に従い，管理される。各参加者による商標のライセンス付与及び個別使用は，民法第398条に従い合意されるものとする。各参加者は独自の手段によって，商標を保護するための民事訴訟及び刑事訴訟を提起することができるが，他の共同所有者に適切な通知を行って，それらの者が当該訴訟の当事者となり，被った費用の支払に寄与することができるようにする。商標又は持分の譲渡の場合は，参加者は，当該譲渡の目的及び実施条件について通知されたときから1月以内に自己の先買権を行使することができる。事前通知が行われなかった場合又は譲渡が当該通知に定めるものとは異なる態様で行われた場合は，参加者は，商標登録簿への譲渡の記録の公告時点から同一期間内に，自己の持分を保留する権利を行使することができる。ある参加者が商標の使用に対して，当該商標の失効宣言に至りかねない程絶対的かつ不当に異議を申し立てた場合は，すべての目的について自己の権利を放棄したとみなされる。 - 特許庁
  • (8) The provisions of Article 142(1) and (2) (Designated Purchaser's Notice to Purchase) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Designated Purchaser, the provisions of Article 143(2) (Withdrawal of Requests for Approval of Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Requester for Approval of Transfer who makes the request set forth in paragraph (4)(i)(c) or paragraph (4)(ii)(c), and the provisions of Article 144(1) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Sale Price), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (vi)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a notice has been given under the provisions of Article 142(1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "Article 140(4)" in Article 142(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act," the terms "per share" and "Stock Company" in Article 142(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit" and "Specific Purpose Company," respectively, the terms "Subject Shares" and "Article 140(1)(ii)" in Article 144(1) and (4) to (6) inclusive of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity prescribed in Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 142(1)(ii)," respectively, the term "Stock Company" in Article 144(1), (2), and (6) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Designated Purchaser," the term "per share" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit," the term "Article 141(2)" in Article 144(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 142(2)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    ８　会社法第百四十二条第一項及び第二項（指定買取人による買取りの通知）の規定は指定買取人について、同法第百四十三条第二項（譲渡等承認請求の撤回）の規定は第四項第一号ハ又は第二号ハの請求をした譲渡等承認請求者について、同法第百四十四条第一項から第六項まで（売買価格の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第六号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第百四十二条第一項の規定による通知があった場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第百四十二条第一項中「第百四十条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同法第百四十四条第一項及び第四項から第六項までの規定中「対象株式」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項に規定する特定出資」と、「第百四十条第一項第二号」とあるのは「第百四十二条第一項第二号」と、同条第一項、第二項及び第六項中「株式会社」とあるのは「指定買取人」と、同条第五項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第六項中「第百四十一条第二項」とあるのは「第百四十二条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 179 (1) The provisions of Article 499 to Article 503 inclusive (Public Notices to Creditors; Restrictions on Performance of Obligations; Performance of Obligations Relating to Conditional Claims; Restrictions on Distribution of Residual Assets Before Performance of Obligations; Exclusion from Liquidation), Article 507(1), (3), and (4) (Conclusion of Liquidation), Article 508 (Retention of Accounting Materials), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to items (ii), (iii), (viii), and (ix)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), Article 928(1) and (3) (Registration of a liquidator), and Article 929 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Registration of Completion of Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "the settlement of accounts (or, in cases where the provisions of the preceding paragraph apply, the settlement of accounts approved under that paragraph) to the shareholders meeting" in Article 507(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the settlement of accounts (those audited as prescribed in Article 177(2) of the Asset Securitization Act) at the general meeting of members," the phrase "A Liquidator (or, for a Company with Board of Liquidators, the liquidators listed in each item of paragraph (7) of Article 489)" in Article 508(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第百七十九条　会社法第四百九十九条から第五百三条まで（債権者に対する公告等、債務の弁済の制限、条件付債権等に係る債務の弁済、債務の弁済前における残余財産の分配の制限、清算からの除斥）、第五百七条第一項、第三項及び第四項（清算事務の終了等）、第五百八条（帳簿資料の保存）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号、第三号、第八号及び第九号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）、第九百二十八条第一項及び第三項（清算人の登記）並びに第九百二十九条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（清算結了の登記）の規定は、特定目的会社の清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百七条第三項中「決算報告（前項の規定の適用がある場合にあっては、同項の承認を受けたもの）を株主総会」とあるのは「決算報告（資産流動化法第百七十七条第二項に規定する監査を受けたもの）を社員総会」と、同法第五百八条第一項中「清算人（清算人会設置会社にあっては、第四百八十九条第七項各号に掲げる清算人）」とあるのは「清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (8) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Specified Equity by a Specific Purpose Company after the formation thereof, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph (2)(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    ８　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の成立後における特定出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (6) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Preferred Equity by a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.), and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph 2(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    ６　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の優先出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) The provisions of Part IV, Chapter III (excluding Article 715) (Bondholders' Meeting), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 7 (Action Seeking Rescission of Performance, etc. of a Bond-issuing Company), Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (x) to item (xii) inclusive) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Specified Bonds, Specified Bondholders, Specified Bond Certificates, Specified Bond Administrators, Specified Bonds registries, and Specified Bondholders Meetings in cases where a Specific Purpose Company issues Specified Bonds. In this case, the terms "Bond-issuing Company," "bearer bonds," and "representative bondholder" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," "Specified Bonds in bearer form," and "representative Specified Bondholder," the phrase "this Act" in Article 716 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Asset Securitization Act or the Asset Securitization Plan," the term "electromagnetic public notice" in Article 720(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Electronic Public Notice (meaning electronic public notice as prescribed in Article 194(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "Bondholders' Meeting Reference Documents" in Article 721 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Reference Documents for a Specified Bondholders Meeting," the phrase "each item of Article 706(1)" in Article 724(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 706" in Article 724(2)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 707" in Article 729(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 707 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 676" in Article 733(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 122(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraphs (1) through (3) of Article 705, and under Articles 708 and 709" in Article 737(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) to (3) inclusive of the Asset Securitization Act and the provisions of Article 708 and Article 709 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 449" in Article 740(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 111 of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 702" in Article 740(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 126 of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 705 (including cases where that paragraph is applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (2) of Article 737)" in Article 741(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 737(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 129(2) of the Asset Securitization Act) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    ２　会社法第四編第三章（第七百十五条を除く。）（社債権者集会）、第七編第二章第七節（社債発行会社の弁済等の取消しの訴え）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第十号から第十二号までに係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社が特定社債を発行する場合における特定社債、特定社債権者、特定社債券、特定社債管理者、特定社債原簿又は特定社債権者集会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「特定社債発行会社」と、「無記名社債」とあるのは「無記名特定社債」と、「代表社債権者」とあるのは「代表特定社債権者」と、同法第七百十六条中「この法律」とあるのは「資産流動化法又は資産流動化計画」と、同法第七百二十条第五項中「電子公告」とあるのは「電子公告（資産流動化法第百九十四条第一項第三号に規定する電子公告をいう。）」と、同法第七百二十一条中「社債権者集会参考書類」とあるのは「特定社債権者集会参考書類」と、同法第七百二十四条第二項第一号中「第七百六条第一項各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項各号」と、同項第二号中「第七百六条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項」と、同法第七百二十九条第一項中「第七百七条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第八項において準用する第七百七条」と、同法第七百三十三条第一号中「第六百七十六条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十二条第一項」と、同法第七百三十七条第二項中「第七百五条第一項から第三項まで、第七百八条及び第七百九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項から第三項まで並びに同条第八項において準用する第七百八条及び第七百九条」と、同法第七百四十条第一項中「第四百四十九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十一条」と、同条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十六条」と、同法第七百四十一条第三項中「第七百五条第一項（第七百三十七条第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項（資産流動化法第百二十九条第二項において準用する第七百三十七条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
＜前へ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

例文データの著作権について