「Notwithstanding」を含む例文一覧(2206)
＜前へ 1 2 .... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 次へ＞- (2) With regard to a Futures Commission Merchant who has received a license under Article 41, paragraph (1) of the Commodity Exchange Act at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, in the case where the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets) exceeds the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets), the standard amount prescribed in Article 49, paragraph (1) of the same Act for said Futures Commission Merchant shall be the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision, for one year from the day of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision.
２ この政令の施行の際現に商品取引所法第四十一条第一項の許可を受けている商品取引員について、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）が改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）を超えている場合には、当該商品取引員の同法第四十九条第一項に規定する基準額は、この政令の施行の日から一年間は、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条の規定にかかわらず、改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) With respect to the sale or labeling of Specified Gas Equipment under Transition pertaining to the approval of model obtained under Article 39-13-3 of the Old Gas Business Act prior to the enforcement of Article 11 (including the approval of model obtained in the cases where the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to Article 60, paragraph 1 or paragraph 3 of the Supplementary Provisions (excluding, however, those concerning Foreign Registered Manufacturers set forth in Article 39-13-3 of the Old Gas Business Act)), the provisions then in force shall remain applicable notwithstanding the provisions of Article 39-3, paragraph 1 and Article 39-4 of the New Gas Business Act, for a period specified by a Cabinet Order under Article 61, paragraph 2 of the Supplementary Provisions for the respective type of the Specified Gas Equipment under Transition from the date of enforcement of Article 11 or a period specified by a Cabinet Order under Article 39-10, paragraph 1 of the Old Gas Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 39-14, paragraph 6 of the Old Gas Business Act from the date of approval, whichever ends earlier.
２ 第十一条の規定の施行の際現に受けている旧ガス事業法第三十九条の十三の三の規定による型式の承認（附則第六十条第一項若しくは第三項の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされて受けた型式の承認（旧ガス事業法第三十九条の十三の三の外国登録製造事業者に係るものに限る。）を含む。）に係る移行特定ガス用品の販売又は表示については、第十一条の規定の施行の日から起算して当該移行特定ガス用品に係る附則第六十一条第二項の政令で定める期間を経過する日又は当該承認の日から旧ガス事業法第三十九条の十四第六項において準用する旧ガス事業法第三十九条の十第一項の政令で定める期間を経過する日のいずれか早い日までの間は、新ガス事業法第三十九条の三第一項及び第三十九条の四の規定にかかわらず、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 71 (1) With regard to city planning projects, the provisions of Article 29 and Article 34-6 of the Compulsory Purchase of Land Act (including the cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 138 paragraph (1) of the same Act) shall not apply to them. If there are any reasons that correspond to the reasons by which the accreditation of projects become null and void pursuant to the provision of Article 29 paragraph (1) of the same Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 138 paragraph (1) of the same Act), the public notice of accreditation of projects pursuant to the provision of Article 26 paragraph (1) of the same Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 138 paragraph (1) of the same Act) shall be deemed to have been made at the time when the reasons occurred, notwithstanding the provision of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, and the provisions of Article 8 paragraph (3), Article 35 paragraph (1), Article 36 paragraph (1), Article 39 paragraph (1), Article 46-2 paragraph (1), Article 71 (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis or where they serve as examples to be followed) and Article 89 paragraph (1) (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 138 paragraph (1) of the same Act) of the same Act shall apply.
第七十一条 都市計画事業については、土地収用法第二十九条及び第三十四条の六（同法第百三十八条第一項においてこれらの規定を準用する場合を含む。）の規定は適用せず、同法第二十九条第一項（同法第百三十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により事業の認定が効力を失うべき理由に該当する理由があるときは、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、その理由の生じた時に同法第二十六条第一項（同法第百三十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による事業の認定の告示があつたものとみなして、同法第八条第三項、第三十五条第一項、第三十六条第一項、第三十九条第一項、第四十六条の二第一項、第七十一条（これを準用し、又はその例による場合を含む。）及び第八十九条第一項（同法第百三十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) With regard to the sale or labeling of the special specified products under transition subject to approval of the type as prescribed in Article 32-4, paragraph (1) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act which is in effect at the time of enforcement of Article 1 (including approval of the type obtained by deeming that the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions (limited to the approval for a foreign registered manufacturer set forth in Article 32-2 of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act)), the provisions then in force shall remain applicable, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (1) and Article 5 of the New Consumer Products Safety Act, until the expiration of the period specified by Cabinet Order provided for in Article 5, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions pertaining to the special specified products under transition starting from the date of enforcement of Article 1 or the expiration of a period specified by Cabinet Order as set forth in Article 25, paragraph (1) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 32-4, paragraph (2) of the Old Consumer Products Safety Act starting from the date of said approval, whichever comes earlier.
２ 第一条の規定の施行の際現に受けている旧消費生活用製品安全法第三十二条の四第一項の規定による型式の承認（附則第四条第一項若しくは第三項の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされて受けた型式の承認（旧消費生活用製品安全法第三十二条の二の外国登録製造事業者に係るものに限る。）を含む。）に係る移行特別特定製品の販売又は表示については、第一条の規定の施行の日から起算して当該移行特別特定製品に係る附則第五条第二項の政令で定める期間を経過する日又は当該承認の日から旧消費生活用製品安全法第三十二条の四第二項において準用する旧消費生活用製品安全法第二十五条第一項の政令で定める期間を経過する日のいずれか早い日までの間は、新消費生活用製品安全法第四条第一項及び第五条の規定にかかわらず、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 271-5 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 271-3, paragraph (1), A Written Notice of Holding the Bank's Voting Rights pertaining to voting rights held by a Bank, Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to one that conducts Securities-Related Business), trust company, or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance who has notified the Prime Minister of a Reference date, where the purpose of holding such voting rights is not for controlling the business activities of the Insurance Company or Insurance Holding Company that has issued the shares relating to that voting rights (excluding the case where the Proportion of Voting Rights Held has exceeded the number specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and any case specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner in which they are held and other circumstances; hereinafter referred to as "Voting Rights Subject to Special Provisions" in this Act) shall be submitted to the Prime Minister by stating matters that relate to the status of holding that voting rights as of the Reference Date on which the Proportion of Voting Rights Held exceeded five hundredths for the first time and that are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, by the fifteenth day of the month following the month containing said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance.
第二百七十一条の五 銀行、金融商品取引業者（有価証券関連業を行う者に限る。）、信託会社その他の内閣府令で定める者のうち基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者が保有する議決権で当該議決権に係る株式の発行者である保険会社又は保険持株会社の事業活動を支配することを保有の目的としないもの（議決権保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合を除く。以下この条において「特例対象議決権」という。）に係る保険議決権保有届出書は、第二百七十一条の三第一項の規定にかかわらず、議決権保有割合が初めて百分の五を超える数となった基準日における当該議決権の保有状況に関する事項であって、内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (4) In the case where a Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations which has prepared an authorized Aquaculture Area Improvement Plan intends to issue a resolution on a change to a Fishery Right Exercise Rule or a Piscary Exercise Rule as provided in paragraph (1) of this Article at a general meeting (including a representatives' meeting), to conform to the contents of the matter provided in Article 4, paragraph (2), item (iii) of this Act in order to make the members of the Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations comply with the contents of the authorized Aquaculture Area Improvement Plan, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 50 of the Aquatic Industry Cooperative Association Act (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 52, paragraph (6) of the same Act which is then applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 92, paragraph (3) of the same Act; hereinafter the same shall apply elsewhere in this paragraph) applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of Article 92 of the same Act, the Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations shall not be required to issue a resolution pursuant to the provisions of Article 50 of the same Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of Article 92 of the same Act, if the consent of all of the member Fisheries Cooperative Associations respectively, directly or indirectly consisting of the specific members (hereinafter referred to as "Specific Members' Associations") is obtained pursuant to ordinance of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.
４ 認定漁場改善計画を作成した漁業協同組合連合会が、認定漁場改善計画の内容を遵守させるために、総会（総代会を含む。）で、第四条第二項第三号に掲げる事項の内容に適合するように行う第一項に規定する漁業権行使規則又は入漁権行使規則の変更の議決を行おうとする場合において、特定組合員を直接又は間接の構成員とする会員たる漁業協同組合（以下「特定組合員所属組合」という。）のすべての同意を農林水産省令で定めるところにより得ているときは、水産業協同組合法第九十二条第三項において準用する同法第五十条（同法第九十二条第三項において準用する同法第五十二条第六項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定にかかわらず、同法第九十二条第三項において準用する同法第五十条の規定による議決によることを要しないものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) In addition to the leases prescribed in to provisions of preceding two paragraphs, in the case where an Appointed Business Operator who has leased the land which is an administrative asset pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph is to continue to own the Specified Building (excluding the portion which is used as Public Facility etc. of the relevant Selected Project) (hereinafter referred to as the "Specified Private Facility" in this article) after the termination of the Selected Project (including the termination due to early termination of the contract which was entered into to implement the said Selected Project; hereinafter the same shall apply in this article and the following article), the national government may, when it finds necessary, continue to lease to the lessee the said land which is an administrative asset (provided that, in the case of early termination of the contract which was entered into to implement the said Selected Project, the lessee is a person who is recognized by the Administrator of Public Facility etc. to be appropriate for the administration of the said Public Facility etc. pertaining to the property that was the Specified Private Facility; hereinafter the same shall apply in paragraph (8)) notwithstanding the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 18 of the National Property Act to the extent that the lease does not prevent the original usage or purpose of the asset.
３ 前二項に定めるもののほか、国は、前項の規定により行政財産である土地の貸付けを受けた者が特定建物のうち選定事業に係る公共施設等の部分以外の部分（以下この条において「特定民間施設」という。）を選定事業の終了（当該選定事業を行うため締結した契約の解除による終了を含む。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）の後においても引き続き所有しようとする場合において、必要があると認めるときは、国有財産法第十八条第一項の規定にかかわらず、当該行政財産である土地を、その用途又は目的を妨げない限度において、その者（当該選定事業を行うため締結した契約の解除による終了の場合にあっては、当該特定民間施設であった施設に係る公共施設等の管理者等が当該公共施設等の管理に関し適当と認める者に限る。第八項において同じ。）に貸し付けることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - With regard to a Futures Commission Merchant who has received a license under Article 41, paragraph 1 of the Commodity Exchange Act at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, in the case where the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets) exceeds the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets), the standard amount prescribed in Article 49, paragraph 1 of the same Act for said Futures Commission Merchant shall be the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision, for one year from the day of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision.
この政令の施行の際現に商品取引所法第四十一条第一項の許可を受けている商品取引員について、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）が改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）を超えている場合には、当該商品取引員の同法第四十九条第一項に規定する基準額は、この政令の施行の日から一年間は、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条の規定にかかわらず、改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額とする。 - 経済産業省 - Sec.188 Reprographic Reproduction by Libraries 188.1. Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection 177.6, any library or archive whose activities are not for profit may, without the authorization of the author of copyright owner, make a single copy of the work by reprographic reproduction: (a) Where the work by reason of its fragile character or rarity cannot be lent to user in its original form; (b) Where the works are isolated articles contained in composite works or brief portions of other published works and the reproduction is necessary to supply them; when this is considered expedient, to person requesting their loan for purposes of research or study instead of lending the volumes or booklets which contain them; and (c) Where the making of such a copy is in order to preserve and, if necessary in the event that it is lost, destroyed or rendered unusable, replace a copy, or to replace, in the permanent collection of another similar library or archive, a copy which has been lost, destroyed or rendered unusable and copies are not available with the publisher.
第188条 図書館における写真複製 188.1177.6の規定に拘らず，営利活動をしない図書館又は公文書館は，次の場合は，著作権を有する著作者の許諾を得ることなく，写真複製により，当該著作物の1個の複製物を製作することができる。 (a)当該著作物が，その破損しやすい性質又は珍奇性のため，原形式で使用のために貸与することができないものである場合 (b)当該著作物が複数の部分で公正された著作物に含まれる独立した論文又はその他公表さ れた著作物の短い部分であり，それを提供するために複製が必要であって，複製することが研究又は学習のためにその貸出を要求する者にとって，それらを含む書物又は小冊子を貸し出すに代えて適切である場合 (c)複製物の作成が，保存するためのものであり，複製物が失われ，破損され，若しくは使用に耐えなくされて必要である場合に複製物と取り替えるため，又は他の同様な図書館若しくは公文書館の永久的収集において，失われ，破損され，若しくは使用に耐えなくされた複製物と取り替えるためのものであり，かつ，発行者から複製物を入手することができない場合 - 特許庁 - Where a device claimed in an application for a utility model registration is identical with a device or invention (excluding a device created or an invention made by the creator of the device claimed in the said application for a utility model registration) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36bis (2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36bis (1) originally attached to the written application of another application for a utility model registration or for a patent which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said application for a utility model registration and published after the filing of the said application for a utility model registration in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3)(hereinafter the "Utility Model Bulletin" or in the patent bulletin under Article 66 (3) of the Patent Act describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a utility model registration shall not be granted for such a device notwithstanding paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said application for a utility model registration, the applicant of the said application and the applicant of the other application for a utility model registration or for a patent are the same person.
実用新案登録出願に係る考案が当該実用新案登録出願の日前の他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて当該実用新案登録出願後に第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報(以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。)の発行又は特許法第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報の発行若しくは出願公開がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面(同法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面)に記載された考案又は発明(その考案又は発明をした者が当該実用新案登録出願に係る考案の考案者と同一の者である場合におけるその考案又は発明を除く。)と同一であるときは、その考案については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、実用新案登録を受けることができない。 - 特許庁 - Where an invention which is the subject of any patent or application for a patent has, before the date of filing, or, where priority is claimed, the priority date of the application, been duly recorded in a document by, or been tried by or on behalf of any Minister of the Government (such invention not having been communicated directly or indirectly by the applicant for or the proprietor of the relevant patent), any Minister of the Government or such of his officers, servants or agents as may be authorized in writing by him, may use the invention so recorded or tried for the service of the State free of any royalty or other payment to the applicant for or the proprietor of the patent, notwithstanding the existence of the application or patent, and, if in the opinion of such Minister the disclosure to the applicant or the proprietor, as the case may be, of the document recording the invention or the evidence of the trial thereof would be detrimental to the public interest, such disclosure may be made confidentially to counsel on behalf of such applicant or proprietor or to any independent expert mutually agreed upon.
特許若しくは特許出願の主題である発明が出願日前又は優先権が主張された場合は当該出願の優先日前に，政府の何れかの大臣により適法に書類に記録され，又は当該大臣により若しくはその代理で審理された場合(当該発明が関連する特許出願人又は特許所有者により直接又は間接に連絡されていなかった場合)は，政府の何れかの大臣又は当該大臣が書面で授権した幹部職員，一般職員若しくは代理人は，記録され又は審理された当該発明については，当該出願又は特許の存在に拘らず，当該特許出願人又は当該特許所有者に対しロイヤルティ若しくはその他の支払なしにアイルランドの国の事業のために，これを使用することができる。また，当該大臣の意見により，当該出願人若しくは場合に応じて特許所有者に対し当該発明を記録した書類又は当該発明についての審理の証拠を開示することが公共の利益を害する筈のときは，当該開示については，当該出願人若しくは特許所有者の代理で又は相互に合意する独立の専門家に秘密裡にこれを諮問することができる。 - 特許庁 - (3) With regard to a building or another structure as set forth in paragraph (1) which falls within the scope of a property under fire prevention measures as set forth in Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1), notwithstanding the provision of Article 8-2-2, paragraph (2), as applied directly or applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1), only where both an inspection directly under the provision of Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1) and an inspection under the provision of Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1) (in the case of a building or another structure which is subject to management under separate titles, both an inspection directly under the provision of Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1) and an inspection under the provision of Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1), covering the whole of the building or other structure (excluding the part for which a certification is granted under the provision of Article 8-2-3, paragraph (1) as applied directly or applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1))) are conducted, and as a result of those inspections, the matters subject to inspection pertaining to the building or other structure are judged by a qualified inspector of a property under fire prevention measures and a qualified inspector for disaster prevention management to conform to the inspection standards for both inspections, a label stating the date of inspection and other matters specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications may be affixed to said building or other structure, as provided for by Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.
３ 第一項の建築物その他の工作物のうち第八条の二の二第一項の防火対象物であるものにあつては、同条第二項及び第一項において準用する同条第二項の規定にかかわらず、同条第一項の規定による点検と併せて第一項において準用する同条第一項の規定による点検（その管理について権原が分かれている建築物その他の工作物にあつては、当該建築物その他の工作物全体（第八条の二の三第一項又は第一項において準用する同条第一項の規定による認定を受けた部分を除く。）についての第八条の二の二第一項の規定による点検と併せて第一項において準用する同条第一項の規定による点検）が行われ、その結果、防火対象物点検資格者及び防災管理点検資格者により点検対象事項がいずれの点検基準にも適合していると認められた場合に限り、総務省令で定めるところにより、点検を行つた日その他総務省令で定める事項を記載した表示を付することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (16) A reassessment or determination (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as a "reassessment or determination") or an assessment and decision prescribed in Article 32(5) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as an "assessment and decision"), which is listed in any of the following items, may be made within six years from the due date or other date specified in the relevant item, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 70(1) to (4) of the said Act (excluding the part concerning the reassessment listed in paragraph (2)(ii) and (iii) of the said Article (limited to a reassessment pertaining to the amount of net loss, etc. prescribed in the said paragraph)). In this case, with regard to the application of the provisions of Article 70(5) and Article 71(1) of the said Act: in Article 70(5) of the said Act, the phrase "preceding paragraphs" shall be deemed to be replaced with "preceding paragraphs and the provision of Article 66-4(16) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation (Special Provisions for Taxation on Transactions with Foreign Affiliated Persons)"; in Article 71(1) of the said Act, the phrase "preceding Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "preceding Article and the provision of Article 66-4(16) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation (Special Provisions for Taxation on Transactions with Foreign Affiliated Persons)," and the phrase "preceding Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "preceding Article and the said paragraph [Article 66-4(16) of the said Act]."
１６ 更正若しくは決定（以下この項において「更正決定」という。）又は国税通則法第三十二条第五項に規定する賦課決定（以下この項において「賦課決定」という。）で次の各号に掲げるものは、同法第七十条第一項から第四項まで（同条第二項第二号及び第三号に掲げる更正（同項に規定する純損失等の金額に係るものに限る。）に係る部分を除く。）の規定にかかわらず、当該各号に定める期限又は日から六年を経過する日まで、することができる。この場合において、同条第五項及び同法第七十一条第一項の規定の適用については、同法第七十条第五項中「前各項」とあるのは「前各項及び租税特別措置法第六十六条の四第十六項（国外関連者との取引に係る課税の特例）」と、同法第七十一条第一項中「が前条」とあるのは「が前条及び租税特別措置法第六十六条の四第十六項（国外関連者との取引に係る課税の特例）」と、「、前条」とあるのは「、前条及び同項」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (16) A reassessment or determination (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as a "reassessment or determination") or an assessment and decision prescribed in Article 32(5) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as an "assessment and decision"), which is listed in any of the following items, may be made within six years from the due date or other date specified in the relevant item, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 70(1) to (4) of the said Act (excluding the part concerning the reassessment listed in paragraph (2)(ii) and (iii) of the said Article (limited to a reassessment pertaining to the amount of net loss, etc. prescribed in the said paragraph)). In this case, with regard to the application of the provisions of Article 70(5) and Article 71(1) of the said Act: in Article 70(5) of the said Act, the phrase "preceding paragraphs" shall be deemed to be replaced with "preceding paragraphs and the provision of Article 68-88(16) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation (Special Provisions for Taxation on Transactions with Foreign Affiliated Persons of Consolidated Corporations)"; in Article 71(1) of the said Act, the phrase "preceding Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "preceding Article and the provision of Article 68-88(16) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation (Special Provisions for Taxation on Transactions with Foreign Affiliated Persons of Consolidated Corporations)," and the phrase "preceding Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "preceding Article and the said paragraph [Article 68-88(16) of the said Act]."
１６ 更正若しくは決定（以下この項において「更正決定」という。）又は国税通則法第三十二条第五項に規定する賦課決定（以下この項において「賦課決定」という。）で次の各号に掲げるものは、同法第七十条第一項から第四項まで（同条第二項第二号及び第三号に掲げる更正（同項に規定する純損失等の金額に係るものに限る。）に係る部分を除く。）の規定にかかわらず、当該各号に定める期限又は日から六年を経過する日まで、することができる。この場合において、同条第五項及び同法第七十一条第一項の規定の適用については、同法第七十条第五項中「前各項」とあるのは「前各項及び租税特別措置法第六十八条の八十八第十六項（連結法人の国外関連者との取引に係る課税の特例）」と、同法第七十一条第一項中「が前条」とあるのは「が前条及び租税特別措置法第六十八条の八十八第十六項（連結法人の国外関連者との取引に係る課税の特例）」と、「、前条」とあるのは「、前条及び同項」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 49 With regard to Transferred Specified Electrical Appliances and Materials pertaining to a product type for which approval under Article 18 or Article 23, paragraph (1) of the Old Electrical Appliance and Material Control Act or confirmation under Article 23-2, paragraph (1) of the Old Electrical Appliance and Material Control Act had been obtained at the time of enforcement of Article 10, or with regard to Class-B Electrical Appliances and Materials as set forth in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Old Electrical Appliance and Material Control Act with structures pertaining to a notification under Article 26-2, paragraph (1) or Article 26-3, paragraph (1) of the Old Electrical Appliance and Material Control Act which fall into the category of Electrical Appliances and Materials set forth in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Electrical Appliance and Material Safety Act, labeling under Article 25, paragraph (1) or Article 26-6, paragraph (1) may be affixed during the one year from the day of enforcement of Article 10 (with regard to those specified by Cabinet Order as Transferred Electrical Appliances and Materials that require a considerable period of time for the repair or alteration of manufacturing equipment accompanied with the change of labeling, the period specified by Cabinet Order for the relevant Transferred Electrical Appliances and Materials within a limit not exceeding three years from the day of the enforcement of Article 10), notwithstanding the provisions of Article 10, paragraph (2) of the Electrical Appliance and Material Safety Act.
第四十九条 第十条の規定の施行の際現に旧電気用品取締法第十八条若しくは第二十三条第一項の認可若しくは旧電気用品取締法第二十三条の二第一項の確認を受けている型式に係る移行特定電気用品又は旧電気用品取締法第二十六条の二第一項若しくは第二十六条の三第一項の規定による届出に係る構造の旧電気用品取締法第二条第二項の乙種電気用品であって電気用品安全法第二条第一項の電気用品であるものについては、電気用品安全法第十条第二項の規定にかかわらず、第十条の規定の施行の日から起算して一年間（表示の変更に伴う製造設備の修理又は改造に相当の期間を要する移行電気用品として政令で定めるものにあっては、第十条の規定の施行の日から起算して三年を超えない範囲内において移行電気用品ごとに政令で定める期間）は、旧電気用品取締法第二十五条第一項又は第二十六条の六第一項の規定の例による表示を付することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 21 (1) In the case a lawsuit demanding the rescission of a Disclosure Decision, etc. or the rescission of a determination or decision regarding the objection to a Disclosure Decision, etc. (referred to as an "Information Disclosure Lawsuit" in the following paragraph and in paragraph 2 of the Supplementary Provisions) is brought to the court of special jurisdiction prescribed in the provision of Article 12, paragraph 4 of the Administrative Case Litigation Act (Act No. 139 of 1962), if, notwithstanding the provision of Article 12, paragraph 5 of the same Act, an appeal lawsuit ( which means an appeal lawsuit prescribed in Article3, paragraph 1 in the same Act; the same shall apply in the following paragraph.) against a Disclosure Decision etc. regarding the same, the same type of or similar Administrative Documents or against a determination or decision regarding the objection against such a Disclosure Decision etc., is pending in another court, the said court of special jurisdiction may, when it finds it reasonable in consideration of the addresses or locations of the parties, the addresses of witnesses who shall be examined, characteristics common to the points at issue or the evidence, and other circumstances, may in response to a petition or on its own authority transfer the whole lawsuit or a part of it to the other court or a court prescribed Article 12, paragraphs 1 to 3 of the same Act.
第二十一条 行政事件訴訟法（昭和三十七年法律第百三十九号）第十二条第四項の規定により同項に規定する特定管轄裁判所に開示決定等の取消しを求める訴訟又は開示決定等に係る不服申立てに対する裁決若しくは決定の取消しを求める訴訟（次項及び附則第二項において「情報公開訴訟」という。）が提起された場合においては、同法第十二条第五項の規定にかかわらず、他の裁判所に同一又は同種若しくは類似の行政文書に係る開示決定等又はこれに係る不服申立てに対する裁決若しくは決定に係る抗告訴訟（同法第三条第一項に規定する抗告訴訟をいう。次項において同じ。）が係属しているときは、当該特定管轄裁判所は、当事者の住所又は所在地、尋問を受けるべき証人の住所、争点又は証拠の共通性その他の事情を考慮して、相当と認めるときは、申立てにより又は職権で、訴訟の全部又は一部について、当該他の裁判所又は同法第十二条第一項から第三項までに定める裁判所に移送することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 52-4 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 52-2(1), a Written Notice of Holding the Bank's Voting Rights pertaining to voting rights held by a Bank, Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to one that conducts Securities-Related Business), trust company (limited to one that has obtained a license set forth in Article 3 or Article 53(1) of the Trust Business Act) or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance who has notified the Prime Minister of a Reference Date, where the purpose of holding such voting rights is not for controlling the business activities of the Bank or Bank Holding Company that has issued the shares relating to that voting rights (excluding the case where the Proportion of Voting Rights Held has exceeded the number specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and any case specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner in which they are held and other circumstances; hereinafter referred to as "Voting Rights Subject to Special Provisions" in this Article) shall be submitted to the Prime Minister stating matters that relate to the status of holding that voting rights as of the Reference Date on which the Proportion of Voting Rights Held exceeded five hundredths for the first time and that are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, by the fifteenth day of the month following the month containing said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance.
第五十二条の四 銀行、金融商品取引業者（有価証券関連業を営む者に限る。）、信託会社（信託業法第三条又は第五十三条第一項の免許を受けたものに限る。）その他の内閣府令で定める者のうち基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者が保有する議決権で当該議決権に係る株式の発行者である銀行又は銀行持株会社の営業活動を支配することを保有の目的としないもの（議決権保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情をして内閣府令で定める場合を除く。以下この条において「特例対象議決権」という。）に係る銀行議決権保有届出書は、第五十二条の二第一項の規定にかかわらず、議決権保有割合が初めて百分の五を超える数となつた基準日における当該議決権の保有状況に関する事項であつて、内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 2 (1) A person who has engaged in Bank Agency Service as defined by Article 2(14) of the Banking Act after the revision (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") by Article 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank Agency Service") at the time when this Act comes into effect (excluding a person who is deemed to obtain a permission under Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act on Effective Date under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the following Article of the Supplementary Provisions) may continue to engage in Bank Agency Service within three months from the Effective Date (or, in the case where a disposition of disapproving the application for permission referred to in Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act or where abolition of Banking Business is ordered under Article 52-56(1) of the New Banking Act as applied by replacing certain terms under the provision of the following paragraph, until the day on which that disposition or order of the abolition is given), notwithstanding the provision of Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act. In the cases where said person filed an application for permission referred to in Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act during said period, even after said period has elapsed, the same shall apply until the disposition of granting or disapproving permission is given.
第二条 この法律の施行の際現に第一条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第二条第十四項に規定する銀行代理業（以下「銀行代理業」という。）を営んでいる者（次条第一項の規定により施行日において新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の許可を受けたものとみなされた者を除く。）は、施行日から起算して三月間（当該期間内に新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の許可に係る申請について不許可の処分があったとき、又は次項の規定により読み替えて適用する新銀行法第五十二条の五十六第一項の規定により銀行代理業の廃止を命じられたときは、当該処分のあった日又は当該廃止を命じられた日までの間）は、新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の規定にかかわらず、引き続き銀行代理業を営むことができる。その者がその期間内に同項の許可の申請をした場合において、その期間を経過したときは、その申請について許可又は不許可の処分があるまでの間も、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 52-4 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 52-2-11, paragraph (1), among Banks, Financial Instruments Specialists (limited to those that engage in Securities Services), trust companies (limited to those that have obtained a license set forth in Article 3 or Article 53, paragraph (1) of the Trust Business Act) and any other persons specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance, where those who have notified the Prime Minister of a Reference Date hold voting rights for a purpose other than to control the business activities of the Bank or Bank Holding Company that has issued the shares related to said voting rights (excluding the case where the Proportion of Voting Rights Held has exceeded the number specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance and any case specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner in which they are held and other circumstances; hereinafter referred to as "Voting Rights Subject to Special Provisions" in this Article), their Written Notices of Voting Rights Held in the Bank shall be submitted to the Prime Minister stating matters that relate to the holding status of those voting rights as of the Reference Date on which the Proportion of Voting Rights Held exceeded five hundredths for the first time and that are specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance, by the 15th day of the month following the month containing said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance.
第五十二条の四 銀行、金融商品取引業者（有価証券関連業を営む者に限る。）、信託会社（信託業法第三条又は第五十三条第一項の免許を受けたものに限る。）その他の内閣府令で定める者のうち基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者が保有する議決権で当該議決権に係る株式の発行者である銀行又は銀行持株会社の営業活動を支配することを保有の目的としないもの（議決権保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合を除く。以下この条において「特例対象議決権」という。）に係る銀行議決権保有届出書は、第五十二条の二の十一第一項の規定にかかわらず、議決権保有割合が初めて百分の五を超える数となつた基準日における当該議決権の保有状況に関する事項であつて、内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (5) The right to the use of a certification trade mark given by registration shall not be deemed to be infringed by the use of any such mark by a person . (a) in relation to goods certified by the registered proprietor of the trade mark if, as to those goods or a bulk of which they form part, the proprietor or another in accordance with his authorisation under the relevant rules has applied the trade mark and has not subsequently removed or obliterated it; (aa) where the registered proprietor has at any time expressly or impliedly consented to the use of the trade mark; or [Ins. Act A881] (b) in relation to goods or services adapted to form part of, or to be accessory to, other goods or services in relation to which the trade mark has been used without infringement of the right given or might for the time being be so used, if the use of the mark is reasonably necessary in order to indicate that the goods or services are so adapted and neither the purpose nor the effect of the use of the mark is to indicate otherwise than in accordance with the fact that the goods or services are certified by the registered proprietor, except that paragraph (a) shall not have effect in the case of use consisting of the application of any such mark to any goods or services notwithstanding that they are such goods or services as are mentioned in that paragraph, if such application is contrary to the relevant rules.
(5) 登録によって生じる証明商標の使用の権利は，次の場合は，ある者により当該標章が使用されても，それにより侵害されたとはみなされない。 (a) 当該商標の登録所有者が証明する商品又はそれら商品を含む一群の商品に関してその登録所有者又は関係規約に基づいてその登録所有者から授権された者が当該商標を使用し，その後これを除去又は消去していない場合 (aa) 登録所有者が何れかの時点でその商標の使用に明示的又は黙示的に同意を与えている場合，又は［法律A881による挿入］ (b) 当該商標が付与された権利を侵害することなく使用されており，又は現にそのように使用することができる別の商品又はサービスの構成部分又は付属要素となるよう改作された商品又はサービスについて，それら商品又はサービスがそのように改作されていることを示すために当該商標の使用が必要であると合理的に認められ，かつ，その使用の目的と効果が何れも，対象の商品又はサービスが登録所有者によって証明されていることを事実に従う以外の方法で示すものでない場合 ただし，(a)は，当該標章が使用される商品又はサービスが(a)に規定される商品又はサービスであっても，そのような使用が関係規約に反している場合は適用されない。 - 特許庁 - Sec.190 Importation for Personal Purposes 190.1. Notwithstanding the provision of Subsection 177.6, but subject to the limitation under the Subsection 185.2, the importation of a copy of a work by an individual for his personal purposes shall be permitted without the authorization of the author of, or other owner of copyright in, the work under the following circumstances: (a) When copies of the work are not available in the Philippines and: (i) not more than one copy at one time is imported for strictly individual use only; or (ii) the importation is by authority of and for the use of the Philippine Government; or (iii) the importation, consisting of not more than three such copies or likenesses in any one invoice, is not for sale but for the use only of any religious, charitable, or educational society or institution duly incorporated or registered, or is for the encouragement of the fine arts, or for any State school, college, university, or free public library in the Philippines. (b) When such copies form parts of libraries and personal baggage belonging to persons or families arriving from foreign countries and are not intended for sale: Provided, that such copies do not exceed three.
第190条 個人的目的のための輸入 190.1177.6の規定に拘らず，ただし，185.2に規定する条件に従い，個人による，その者の個人的目的のための著作物の複製物の輸入は，次の状況のもとにある著作物の場合にあっては，著作物の著作者又は同著作物におけるその他の著作権者の承諾を得ないで，これをすることができる。 (a)著作物の複製物をフィリピンにおいて入手することができず，かつ，次の何れかに該当する場合 (i)一時に1個の複製物が厳密に個人的使用のためにのみ輸入されること (ii)輸入が，フィリピン政府の権限により，フィリピン政府の使用のために行われること (iii)輸入が，1の送り状における2個以下の複製物又は類似物からなるものであって，販売のためのものではなく，正当に設立され若しくは登録された宗教，慈善若しくは教育に関す る協会若しくは機構による使用のみのためのものであるか又はフィリピンにおける美術の奨励のため，若しくは国の学校，専門学校，大学若しくは無料の公共図書館のためのものであること (b)当該複製物が，外国から到着した者又は家族のものである蔵書及び個人的手荷物の部分であり，かつ，販売する意思のないものである場合 ただし，当該複製物の個数は3個を超えないことを条件とする。 - 特許庁 - Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36bis (2) , the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36bis (1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent bulletin under Article 66(3) of the patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "patent bulletin" or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14 (3) of the utility model Act (Act No.123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29 (1) ; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person.
特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報(以下「特許掲載公報」という。)の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法(昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号)第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報(以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。)の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面(第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面)に記載された発明又は考案(その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。)と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 特許庁 - (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the Court shall not grant relief by way of damage or an account of profits in any case- (a) where in a suit for infringement of a trademark, the infringement complained of is in relation to a certification trademark; or (b) where in a suit for infringement the defendant satisfies the court- (i) that at the time he commenced to use the trademark complained of in the suit he was unaware and had no reasonable ground for believing that the trademark of the plaintiff was on the Register or that the plaintiff was a registered user using by way of permitted use; and (ii) that when he became aware of the existence and nature of the plaintiff's right in the trademark, he forthwith ceased to use the trademark in relation to goods or services in respect of which it was registered; or 65 (c) where in a suit for passing off the defendant satisfies the Court,- (i) that at the time he commenced to use the trademark complained of in the suit he was unaware and had no reasonable ground for believing that the trademark, of the plaintiff was in use; and (ii) that when he became aware of the existence and nature of the plaintiffs trademark, he forthwith ceased to use the trademark complained of.
(2)本条第(1)条の規定にかかわらず、裁判所は次の場合損害賠償又は不当収益弁済金の方法による救済を与えない。(a)商標の侵害に対する訴訟において訴訟物である侵害が証明商標に関するものである場合、又は(b)侵害に対する訴訟において被告が裁判所に次の心証を与える場合。(i)当該訴訟で審理の対象となる商標の使用を開始した時、原告の商標が登録簿に登録されていたこと、又は原告が許諾された使用の方法で使用する登録使用権者であったことを知らず、またそれを信ずるに足る十分な根拠が無かったこと(ii)当該商標に係る原告の権利の存在及び権利の性質を知った時、当該商標が登録されていた商品又は役務に関する商標の使用を直ちに中止したこと又は、(c)詐称通用に対する訴訟において被告が裁判所に次の心証を与える場合。(i)当該訴訟で審理の対象となる商標の使用を開始した時、原告の商標が使用されていることを知らず、またそれを信ずるに足る十分な根拠が無かったこと(ii)原告の当該商標の存在及び当該商標の性質を知った時、審理の対象となる商標の使用を直ちに中止したこと - 特許庁 - Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person.
特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という。）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 特許庁 - Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person.
特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であって当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあっては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 特許庁 - Article 7 Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 3 to Article 5, the prohibition of dismissal or any other disadvantageous treatment of the national public officers in the regular service, court officers to whom the Act on Temporary Measures concerning Court Officer (Act No. 299 of 1951) is applicable, Diet officers to whom the Diet Officers Act (Act No. 85 of 1947) is applicable, SDF personnel specified in Paragraph 5 of Article 2 of the Self-Defense Forces Act (Act No. 165 of 1954), and local public officers in the regular service (referred to as "National Public Officers in the Regular Service, etc." in this Article) on the basis of Whistleblowing provided for in Items of Article 3 shall be governed by the provision of the National Public Officer Act (Act No. 120 of 1947, including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the Act on Temporary Measures concerning Court Officer), Diet Officers Act, Self-Defense Forces Act, and Local Public Officers Act (Act No. 261 of 1950). In this case, the appointer of National Public Officers in the Regular Service, etc., and any other business operator provided for in Item (i) of Paragraph 1 of Article 2 shall apply the provisions of these Acts in order to prevent dismissal or any other disadvantageous treatment of any National Public Officers in the Regular Service, etc., on the bases of the Whistleblowing as provided for in the Items of Article 3.
第七条 第三条各号に定める公益通報をしたことを理由とする一般職の国家公務員、裁判所職員臨時措置法（昭和二十六年法律第二百九十九号）の適用を受ける裁判所職員、国会職員法（昭和二十二年法律第八十五号）の適用を受ける国会職員、自衛隊法（昭和二十九年法律第百六十五号）第二条第五項に規定する隊員及び一般職の地方公務員（以下この条において「一般職の国家公務員等」という。）に対する免職その他不利益な取扱いの禁止については、第三条から第五条までの規定にかかわらず、国家公務員法（昭和二十二年法律第百二十号。裁判所職員臨時措置法において準用する場合を含む。）、国会職員法 、自衛隊法及び地方公務員法（昭和二十五年法律第二百六十一号）の定めるところによる。この場合において、一般職の国家公務員等の任命権者その他の第二条第一項第一号に掲げる事業者は、第三条各号に定める公益通報をしたことを理由として一般職の国家公務員等に対して免職その他不利益な取扱いがされることのないよう、これらの法律の規定を適用しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 43 (1) Until the scope of surviving family members eligible to receive a compensation pension for surviving family has been revised under the provision of Article 45 of the Supplementary Provisions, a worker's husband (including a person who has not made a notification of marriage but has been in a de facto marital relationship with the worker; hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph), parents, grandparents and siblings who were dependent on the worker's income at the time of his/her death and were 55 or over or under 60 years of age (excluding those prescribed in Article 16-2, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act who do not fall under Article 16-4, paragraph (1), item (vi) of said Act) shall, notwithstanding the provision of Article 16-2, paragraph (1) of said Act, be regarded as surviving family members eligible to receive a compensation pension for surviving family under the provisions of said Act. In this case, the term "any of the items of the preceding paragraph" in Article 16-4, paragraph (2) of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "any of the items of the preceding paragraph (excluding item (vi))," and the term "surviving family members eligible to receive a compensation pension for surviving family" in the row concerning a compensation pension for surviving family in Appended Table 1 of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "surviving family members eligible to receive a compensation pension for surviving family (excluding surviving family members prescribed in Article 43, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act for Partial Revision to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (Act No. 130 of 1965) who are under 60 years of age)."
第四十三条 附則第四十五条の規定に基づき遺族補償年金を受けることができる遺族の範囲が改定されるまでの間、労働者の夫（婚姻の届出をしていないが、事実上婚姻関係と同様の事情にあつた者を含む。以下次項において同じ。）、父母、祖父母及び兄弟姉妹であつて、労働者の死亡の当時、その収入によつて生計を維持し、かつ、五十五歳以上六十歳未満であつたもの（労働者災害補償保険法第十六条の二第一項第四号に規定する者であつて、同法第十六条の四第一項第六号に該当しないものを除く。）は、同法第十六条の二第一項の規定にかかわらず、同法の規定による遺族補償年金を受けることができる遺族とする。この場合において、同法第十六条の四第二項中「各号の一」とあるのは「各号の一（第六号を除く。）」と、同法別表第一の遺族補償年金の項中「遺族補償年金を受けることができる遺族」とあるのは「遺族補償年金を受けることができる遺族（労働者災害補償保険法の一部を改正する法律（昭和四十年法律第百三十号）附則第四十三条第一項に規定する遺族であつて六十歳未満であるものを除く。）」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (11) Where the obligation to obtain permission from the Minister of Finance has been imposed pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 or 2 of Article 21 in regard to outward direct investment that shall be notified pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1, a resident who makes the outward direct investment shall not be required to give notification, notwithstanding the provision of paragraph 1. In this case, when a notification pursuant to the said paragraph has already been given in regard to the outward direct investment, the notification (limited to those pertaining to outward direct investment (excluding those for which a notice of acceptance of the recommendation of discontinuance has been given pursuant to the provision of paragraph 6 and those of which discontinuation has been ordered pursuant to the provision of paragraph 9) which has not been actually made at the time of imposition of the obligation to obtain permission pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 or 2 of the said article) shall be deemed to be an application pertaining to permission that the resident was obliged to obtain pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 or 2 of the said article, which was filed on the day of the notification, and when a recommendation pursuant to the provision of paragraph 4, a notice pursuant to the provision of paragraph 6 (limited to those accepting the change of the content) or an order pursuant to paragraph 9 (limited to those pertaining to the change of the content) has been made in regard to outward direct investment pertaining to the notification, the recommendation, notice or order shall be deemed to have not been made.
１１ 第一項の規定により届け出なければならないとされる対外直接投資について第二十一条第一項又は第二項の規定により財務大臣の許可を受ける義務が課された場合には、当該対外直接投資を行う居住者は、第一項の規定にかかわらず、その届出をすることを要しない。この場合において、当該対外直接投資について既に同項の規定による届出がされているときは、当該届出（同条第一項又は第二項の規定により許可を受ける義務が課された際現に行つていない対外直接投資（第六項の規定により中止の勧告を応諾する旨の通知がされたもの及び第九項の規定により中止を命ぜられたものを除く。）に係るものに限る。）については、これを当該届出のあつた日にされた同条第一項又は第二項の規定により受ける義務を課された許可に係る申請とみなし、当該届出に係る対外直接投資について第四項の規定による勧告、第六項の規定による通知（内容の変更を応諾する旨のものに限る。）又は第九項の規定による命令（内容の変更に係るものに限る。）があつたときは、当該勧告、通知又は命令については、これをなかつたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 29-2 Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person.
第二十九条の二 特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という。）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 3-2 Where a device claimed in an application for a utility model registration is identical with a device or invention (excluding a device created or an invention made by the creator of the device claimed in the said application for a utility model registration) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36-2(2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a utility model registration or for a patent which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said application for a utility model registration and published after the filing of the said application for a utility model registration in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) (hereinafter the "Utility Model Bulletin") or in the patent bulletin under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a utility model registration shall not be granted for such a device notwithstanding paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said application for a utility model registration, the applicant of the said application and the applicant of the other application for a utility model registration or for a patent are the same person.
第三条の二 実用新案登録出願に係る考案が当該実用新案登録出願の日前の他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて当該実用新案登録出願後に第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行又は特許法第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報の発行若しくは出願公開がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（同法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案又は発明（その考案又は発明をした者が当該実用新案登録出願に係る考案の考案者と同一の者である場合におけるその考案又は発明を除く。）と同一であるときは、その考案については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、実用新案登録を受けることができない。ただし、当該実用新案登録出願の時にその出願人と当該他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 15-2 The amount of the general insurance premiums, among the labor insurance premiums payable pursuant to the provision of the preceding Article, paragraph (1) or (2) by the business operator of a business employing older workers for which the amount prescribed by Article 11-2 is acknowledged as the amount of the general insurance premiums pursuant to the provision of the same Article (hereinafter referred to as the "businesses pertaining to older worker exemptions" in Article 19-2 and Article 30), shall be, as specified by a Cabinet Order and notwithstanding the provision of the same Article, paragraph (1), item (i) or (ii), or paragraph (2), item (i) or (ii), the amount obtained by reducing, from the amount listed in each such item, the amount not exceeding the amount obtained by multiplying the prospective amount of total wages of older workers (if such amount includes a fraction less than one thousand yen, the amount after discarding such fraction pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and in Article 19-2) pertaining to the older workers employed during such insurance year (or the older workers employed during the period from the establishment of such insurance relation to the end of such insurance year in case the insurance relation is established in the midst of an insurance year) (or the amount of total wages of older workers pertaining to the older workers employed during the immediately preceding insurance year, in case prescribed as such in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare), by the employment insurance rate.
第十五条の二 第十一条の二の規定により一般保険料の額を同条の規定による額とすることとされた高年齢労働者を使用する事業（第十九条の二及び第三十条において「高年齢者免除額に係る事業」という。）の事業主が前条第一項又は第二項の規定により納付すべき労働保険料のうち一般保険料の額は、政令で定めるところにより、同条第一項第一号若しくは第二号又は第二項第一号若しくは第二号の規定にかかわらず、当該各号の規定による額から、その保険年度に使用する高年齢労働者（保険年度の中途に保険関係が成立したものについては、当該保険関係が成立した日からその保険年度の末日までに使用する高年齢労働者）に係る高年齢者賃金総額（その額に千円未満の端数がある場合には、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより端数計算をした後の額。以下この条及び第十九条の二において同じ。）の見込額（厚生労働省令で定める場合にあつては、直前の保険年度に使用した高年齢労働者に係る高年齢者賃金総額）に雇用保険率を乗じて得た額を超えない額を減じた額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 132-10 (1) In the case of a petition or any other statement to be filed or made in the procedures for civil suits (hereinafter referred to as a "petition, etc."), which shall be filed or made, pursuant to the provisions of this Code or other laws and regulations concerning such petition, etc., by means of a document, etc. (meaning a document, a transcript, extract, authenticated copy or duplicate of a document or a duplicate of a bill or note, or any other paper or other tangible object on which information recognizable to human perception such as characters and shapes is stated; the same shall apply hereinafter) to the court specified by the Supreme Court (including one filed or made to the presiding judge, authorized judge, commissioned judge or court clerk of such court), notwithstanding the provisions of said laws and regulations, as provided for by the Rules of the Supreme Court, the petition, etc. may be filed or made by means of an electronic data processing system (meaning an electronic data processing system wherein the computer (including input-output devices; the same shall apply hereinafter) used in the court is connected, by way of telecommunication lines, to the computer used by the person who files or makes the petition, etc. or person who receives a notice of a disposition under the provision of Article 399(1); the same shall apply in Article 397 to Article 401); provided, however, that this shall not apply to a petition, etc. on the demand procedure where a petition for demand for payment is filed or made by means of a document.
第百三十二条の十 民事訴訟に関する手続における申立てその他の申述（以下「申立て等」という。）のうち、当該申立て等に関するこの法律その他の法令の規定により書面等（書面、書類、文書、謄本、抄本、正本、副本、複本その他文字、図形等人の知覚によって認識することができる情報が記載された紙その他の有体物をいう。以下同じ。）をもってするものとされているものであって、最高裁判所の定める裁判所に対してするもの（当該裁判所の裁判長、受命裁判官、受託裁判官又は裁判所書記官に対してするものを含む。）については、当該法令の規定にかかわらず、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電子情報処理組織（裁判所の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。以下同じ。）と申立て等をする者又は第三百九十九条第一項の規定による処分の告知を受ける者の使用に係る電子計算機とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。第三百九十七条から第四百一条までにおいて同じ。）を用いてすることができる。ただし、督促手続に関する申立て等であって、支払督促の申立てが書面をもってされたものについては、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 6 (1) In the case where a Fisheries Cooperative Association that has prepared an authorized Aquaculture Area Improvement Plan intends to issue a resolution on a change (excluding a change to a matter relevant to the qualification of any person having the right to operate a fishery provided in paragraph (1) of Article 8 of the Fishery Act; the same shall apply in paragraph (4)) to the Fishery Right Exercise Rule or Piscary Exercise Rule (referring to the Fishery Right Exercise Rule or Piscary Exercise Rule of the same paragraph) at a general meeting (including a sectional meeting of the general meeting and a representatives' meeting) in conformance with the contents of Article 4, paragraph (2), item (iii), in order to make the members of the association comply with the contents of the authorized Aquaculture Area Improvement Plan, the Fisheries Cooperative Association shall not be required to issue a resolution pursuant to the provisions of Article 50 of the Aquatic Industry Cooperative Association Act (Act No. 242 of 1948) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (6) of Article 52 of the same Act; the same shall apply elsewhere in this paragraph) or paragraph (6) of Article 51-2 of the same Act, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 50 or paragraph (6) of Article 51-2 of the same Act, if the consent in writing of not fewer than two-thirds of the members having the right to operate the fishery covered by said fishery right or common of piscary (hereinafter referred to as "the specific members") is obtained pursuant to ordinance of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.
第六条 認定漁場改善計画を作成した漁業協同組合が、認定漁場改善計画の内容を遵守させるために、総会（総会の部会及び総代会を含む。）で、第四条第二項第三号に掲げる事項の内容に適合するように行う漁業権行使規則又は入漁権行使規則（漁業法第八条第一項の漁業権行使規則又は入漁権行使規則をいう。）の変更（同項に規定する漁業を営む権利を有する者の資格に関する事項の変更を除く。第四項において同じ。）の議決を行おうとする場合において、当該漁業権又は入漁権の内容たる漁業を営む権利を有する組合員（以下「特定組合員」という。）の三分の二以上の書面による同意を農林水産省令で定めるところにより得ているときは、水産業協同組合法（昭和二十三年法律第二百四十二号）第五十条（同法第五十二条第六項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）又は第五十一条の二第六項の規定にかかわらず、同法第五十条又は第五十一条の二第六項の規定による議決によることを要しないものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, where a juridical person holds the majority of voting rights (excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which may not be exercised for all matters that may be resolved at a shareholders meeting, and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provision of Article 879(3) of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005); hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph, Article 59(3)(ii) and (4) and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(a) and (b)) of all shareholders of a stock company, if a rehabilitation case or reorganization case (hereinafter referred to as a "rehabilitation case, etc." in this Article) is pending against said juridical person (hereinafter referred to as a "parent juridical person" in this Article and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(b)), a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings against said stock company (hereinafter referred to as a "subsidiary stock company" in this Article and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(b)) may also be filed with the district court before which the rehabilitation case, etc. against the parent juridical person is pending, and if a rehabilitation case, etc. is pending against the subsidiary stock company, a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings against the parent juridical person may also be filed with the district court before which the rehabilitation case, etc. against the subsidiary stock company is pending.
３ 前二項の規定にかかわらず、法人が株式会社の総株主の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法（平成十七年法律第八十六号）第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。次項、第五十九条第三項第二号及び第四項並びに第百二十七条の二第二項第二号イ及びロにおいて同じ。）の過半数を有する場合には、当該法人（以下この条及び第百二十七条の二第二項第二号ロにおいて「親法人」という。）について再生事件又は更生事件（以下この条において「再生事件等」という。）が係属しているときにおける当該株式会社（以下この条及び第百二十七条の二第二項第二号ロにおいて「子株式会社」という。）についての再生手続開始の申立ては、親法人の再生事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができ、子株式会社について再生事件等が係属しているときにおける親法人についての再生手続開始の申立ては、子株式会社の再生事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, where a juridical person holds the majority of voting rights (excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which may not be exercised for all matters that may be resolved at a shareholders meeting, and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provision of Article 879(3) of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005); hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph, Article 83(2)(ii) and (3) and Article 161(2)(ii)(a) and (b)) of all shareholders of a stock company, if a bankruptcy case, rehabilitation case or reorganization case (hereinafter referred to as a "bankruptcy case, etc." in this Article) is pending against said juridical person (hereinafter referred to as a "parent juridical person" in this Article and Article 161(2)(ii)(b)), a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings against said stock company (hereinafter referred to as a "subsidiary stock company" in this Article and Article 161(2)(ii)(b)) may also be filed with the district court before which the bankruptcy case, etc. against the parent juridical person is pending, and if a bankruptcy case, etc. is pending against the subsidiary stock company, a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings against the parent juridical person may also be filed with the district court before which the bankruptcy case, etc. against the subsidiary stock company is pending.
３ 前二項の規定にかかわらず、法人が株式会社の総株主の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法（平成十七年法律第八十六号）第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。次項、第八十三条第二項第二号及び第三項並びに第百六十一条第二項第二号イ及びロにおいて同じ。）の過半数を有する場合には、当該法人（以下この条及び第百六十一条第二項第二号ロにおいて「親法人」という。）について破産事件、再生事件又は更生事件（以下この条において「破産事件等」という。）が係属しているときにおける当該株式会社（以下この条及び第百六十一条第二項第二号ロにおいて「子株式会社」という。）についての破産手続開始の申立ては、親法人の破産事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができ、子株式会社について破産事件等が係属しているときにおける親法人についての破産手続開始の申立ては、子株式会社の破産事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (13) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1), item (i), for processed food made from specific raw materials where it is easy to judge that specific raw materials are contained as raw materials from its name (hereinafter referred to as "specific processed food" in this paragraph), labeling indicating that said specific raw materials are contained as raw materials may be omitted. For processed food made from specific processed food (excluding that made from milk (meaning milk provided in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Ministerial Ordinance concerning the Ingredient Standards for Milk and Dairy Products (Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare No. 52 of 1951); the same shall apply hereinafter)), labeling indicating that specific raw materials are contained as raw materials may be replaced by indicating that said specific processed food is contained as a raw material. For food containing additives derived from specific raw materials and which has labeling attached indicating that said specific raw materials or specific processed food made from said specific raw materials are contained as raw materials and where it is easy to judge that said specific raw materials are contained as raw materials from its name, labeling indicating that additives contained in said food are derived from said specific raw materials may be omitted. For additives derived from said specific raw materials where it is easy to judge that they are derived from specific raw materials from their name, labeling indicating that they are derived from said specific raw materials may be omitted.
１３ 第一項第一号の規定にかかわらず、特定原材料を原材料とする加工食品であつて、その名称が特定原材料を原材料として含むことが容易に判別できるもの（以下この項において「特定加工食品」という。）にあつては当該特定原材料を原材料として含む旨の表示を省略することができ、特定加工食品（乳（乳及び乳製品の成分規格等に関する省令（昭和二十六年厚生省令第五十二号）第二条第一項に規定する乳をいう。以下同じ。）を原材料とするものを除く。）を原材料とする加工食品にあつては特定原材料を原材料として含む旨の表示は、当該特定加工食品を原材料として含む旨の表示をもつて、これに代えることができ、特定原材料に由来する添加物を含む食品であつて、当該特定原材料又は当該特定原材料を原材料とする特定加工食品を原材料として含む旨を表示しているもの及びその名称が当該特定原材料を原材料として含むことが容易に判別できるものにあつては当該食品に含まれる添加物が当該特定原材料に由来する旨の表示を省略することができ、特定原材料に由来する添加物であつて、その名称が特定原材料に由来することが容易に判別できるものにあつては当該特定原材料に由来する旨の表示を省略することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 68 (1) The Minister of MEXT, Minister of METI, Minister of MLIT or prefectural public safety commission may, within the limit necessary for enforcing this Act (for the Minister of MEXT, Minister of METI and Minister of MLIT, the provisions of this Act in accordance with the classifications for licensee of nuclear energy activity, etc. listed in each of the items in Article 64 (3) (Minister of MEXT for nuclear source material users, international controlled material users, persons provided in each of the items in Article 61-3 (1) in the case that any of said items are applicable, persons provided in paragraphs (5), (6), (8) and (9) of said Article and international specified activities implementers, notwithstanding said classifications in each of the items in Article 64 (3)); for a prefectural public safety commission, the provision of Article 59 (6)), allow an official (police official in the case of a prefectural public safety commission) to enter the office, factory or place of activity of any licensee of nuclear energy activity, etc. (including nuclear source material users, international controlled material users, persons provided in each of the items in Article 61-3 (1) in the case that any of said items are applicable, persons provided in paragraphs (5), (6), (8) and (9) of said Article and international specified activities implementers), inspect books, documents and any other necessary property, and question the people concerned or request the submission of nuclear source material, nuclear fuel material or any other necessary samples, limited to the minimum amount necessary for examination.
第六十八条 文部科学大臣、経済産業大臣、国土交通大臣又は都道府県公安委員会は、この法律（文部科学大臣、経済産業大臣又は国土交通大臣にあつては第六十四条第三項各号に掲げる原子力事業者等の区分（核原料物質使用者、国際規制物資使用者、第六十一条の三第一項各号のいずれかに該当する場合における当該各号に規定する者、同条第五項、第六項、第八項及び第九項に規定する者並びに国際特定活動実施者については、第六十四条第三項各号の当該区分にかかわらず、文部科学大臣とする。）に応じこの法律の規定、都道府県公安委員会にあつては第五十九条第六項の規定）の施行に必要な限度において、その職員（都道府県公安委員会にあつては、警察職員）に、原子力事業者等（核原料物質使用者、国際規制物資使用者、第六十一条の三第一項各号のいずれかに該当する場合における当該各号に規定する者、同条第五項、第六項、第八項及び第九項に規定する者並びに国際特定活動実施者を含む。）の事務所又は工場若しくは事業所に立ち入り、帳簿、書類その他必要な物件を検査させ、関係者に質問させ、又は試験のため必要な最小限度の量に限り、核原料物質、核燃料物質その他の必要な試料を収去させることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) Notwithstanding the provision of the preceding paragraph, for the persons with disabilities who receive payment pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 29 or paragraph 1 of Article 30, or who live in, the support facilities for the persons with disabilities Nozominosono, or the facilities prescribed in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of paragraph 1 or paragraph 5 of Article 5 after receiving placement measure pursuant to the provision of paragraph 2 of Article 19 of Act for the welfare of Persons with Physical Disabilities or paragraph 1, Article 16 of Act for the welfare of persons with intellectual disabilities; or who live in such facilities pursuant to the provision of proviso of paragraph 1 of Article 30 of Public Assistance Act(Act No. 144 of 1950) (hereafter collectively referred to as "persons with disabilities entered placement in specified facilities" in this paragraph), the municipality where such persons had domiciles before entering the support facilities for persons with disabilities, Nozominosono, the facilities prescribed in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in paragraph 1 or paragraph 5 of Article 5, or the facilities prescribed in proviso of paragraph 1 of Article 30 of the same Act (hereinafter referred to as "specified facilities") shall make grant decision; for persons with disabilities entered placement in specified facilities and have entered successively not less than two facilities (hereinafter referred to as "persons with disabilities entered placement successively" in this paragraph), the municipalities where the first facilities which such persons with disabilities entered placement are located shall make grant decision. Provided, however, for the persons with disabilities entered placement in specified facilities who did not have their domiciles before their placement or their domiciles were not clear, the municipality where they had location at the time of placement (for persons with disabilities entered placement successively: domiciles they had before they entered the first specified facility) shall make grant decision.
３ 前項の規定にかかわらず、第二十九条第一項若しくは第三十条第一項の規定により介護給付費等の支給を受けて又は身体障害者福祉法第十八条第二項若しくは知的障害者福祉法第十六条第一項の規定により入所措置が採られて障害者支援施設、のぞみの園又は第五条第一項若しくは第五項の厚生労働省令で定める施設に入所している障害者及び生活保護法（昭和二十五年法律第百四十四号）第三十条第一項ただし書の規定により入所している障害者（以下この項において「特定施設入所障害者」と総称する。）については、その者が障害者支援施設、のぞみの園、第五条第一項若しくは第五項の厚生労働省令で定める施設又は同法第三十条第一項ただし書に規定する施設（以下「特定施設」という。）への入所前に有した居住地（継続して二以上の特定施設に入所している特定施設入所障害者（以下この項において「継続入所障害者」という。）については、最初に入所した特定施設への入所前に有した居住地）の市町村が、支給決定を行うものとする。ただし、特定施設への入所前に居住地を有しないか、又は明らかでなかった特定施設入所障害者については、入所前におけるその者の所在地（継続入所障害者については、最初に入所した特定施設の入所前に有した所在地）の市町村が、支給決定を行うものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 27-26 (1) A Report of Possession of Large Volume pertaining to Share Certificates, etc. which are held by a Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to those who conduct the Type I Financial Instruments Business under Article 28(1), or who conduct the Investment Management Business under paragraph (4) of the same Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), a bank or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (limited to those who have notified the Reference Date specified in paragraph (3) to the Prime Minister) where the purpose of holding is not for effecting material changes in or giving material effect to the business activities of the issuer of said Share Certificates, etc., as specified by a Cabinet Order (referred to as "Act of Making Important Suggestion, etc." in paragraphs (4) and (5)) (excluding the cases where the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. exceeds the ratio specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, or other cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner of holding and other circumstances), or which are held by the State, local government or other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (limited to those who have notified the Reference Date specified in paragraph (3) to the Prime Minister) (such Share Certificates, etc. are hereinafter collectively referred to as "Share Certificates, etc. Subject to Special Provisions" in this Article) shall, notwithstanding the provision of the main clause of Article 27-23(1), be submitted to the Prime Minister with a statement of the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance with regard to the status of holding of said Share Certificates, etc. as of the Reference Date when the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. have exceeded 5% for the first time, within five days from said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance.
第二十七条の二十六 金融商品取引業者（第二十八条第一項に規定する第一種金融商品取引業を行う者又は同条第四項に規定する投資運用業を行う者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）、銀行その他の内閣府令で定める者（第三項に規定する基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者に限る。）が保有する株券等で当該株券等の発行者の事業活動に重大な変更を加え、又は重大な影響を及ぼす行為として政令で定めるもの（第四項及び第五項において「重要提案行為等」という。）を行うことを保有の目的としないもの（株券等保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合を除く。）又は国、地方公共団体その他の内閣府令で定める者（第三項に規定する基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者に限る。）が保有する株券等（以下この条において「特例対象株券等」という。）に係る大量保有報告書は、第二十七条の二十三第一項本文の規定にかかわらず、株券等保有割合が初めて百分の五を超えることとなつた基準日における当該株券等の保有状況に関する事項で内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日から五日以内に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 3 From among persons who, at the time of establishment of the Institute, are actually employees of an agency or a department specified by Cabinet Order, as prescribed in the preceding Article, when there is any person who has proceeded to become an employee of the Institute on the day of establishment of the Institute (hereinafter referred to as a "successional employee" in the following Article) and who has obtained recognition pursuant to the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (1) of the Child Allowance Act (Act No. 73 of 1971) (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 6, paragraph (2), Article 7, paragraph (4), or Article 8, paragraph (4) of the supplementary provisions of said Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) from the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, or when there is any person who has been delegated by the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry on the day preceding the date of establishment of the Institute and who falls under the payment requirements for child allowance or the benefits specified in Article 6, paragraph (1), Article 7, paragraph (1) or Article 8, paragraph (1) of the supplementary provisions of said Act (hereinafter referred to as "special benefits, etc." in this Article) on the day of establishment of the Institute, payment of child allowance or special benefits, etc. to said person shall be deemed as having been recognized by the mayor (including ward mayors of special wards) pursuant to the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (1) of said Act on the day of establishment of the Institute. In this case, payment of such child allowance or special benefits, etc. that were deemed to have been recognized shall begin the month after the month in which the day preceding the day of establishment of the Institute falls, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 8, paragraph (2) of said Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 6, paragraph (2), Article 7, paragraph (4), or Article 8, paragraph (4) of the supplementary provisions of said Act).
第三条 研究所の成立の際現に前条に規定する政令で定める部局又は機関の職員である者のうち、研究所の成立の日において引き続き研究所の職員となったもの（次条において「引継職員」という。）であって、研究所の成立の日の前日において経済産業大臣又はその委任を受けた者から児童手当法（昭和四十六年法律第七十三号）第七条第一項（同法附則第六条第二項、第七条第四項又は第八条第四項において準用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の規定による認定を受けているものが、研究所の成立の日において児童手当又は同法附則第六条第一項、第七条第一項若しくは第八条第一項の給付（以下この条において「特例給付等」という。）の支給要件に該当するときは、その者に対する児童手当又は特例給付等の支給に関しては、研究所の成立の日において同法第七条第一項の規定による市町村長（特別区の区長を含む。）の認定があったものとみなす。この場合において、その認定があったものとみなされた児童手当又は特例給付等の支給は、同法第八条第二項（同法附則第六条第二項、第七条第四項又は第八条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定にかかわらず、研究所の成立の日の前日の属する月の翌月から始める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the following acts do not constitute an infringement of the right to the use of a registered 26 trademark- (a) where a trademark is registered subject to any conditions or limitations, the use of the trademark in any manner in relation to goods or services, as the case may be, to be sold or otherwise traded in, in any place, or in relation to goods or services to be exported to any market, or in any other circumstances, to which, having regard to those conditions or limitations, the registration does not extend; (b) by being permitted to use those goods or a bulk of which they form part or services, or a bulk of which they form part by the proprietor of the trademark or any person related to the trade of goods or services in relation with the registered user or to use within the limit of permitted use of the registered proprietor or user, the use of such trademark, unless the registered proprietor or the user subsequently has removed or obliterated it, or has at any time expressly or impliedly consented to the use of the trademark; (c) by registration under this Act- (i) the use of a trademark is within established right by a person in relation to goods or services adapted to form part of, or to be accessory to, other goods or services; (ii) the use of a registered trademark, being one of two or more trademarks registered under this Act which are identical or nearly resemble each other, is in exercise of the right to the use of the trademarks given by registration under this Act.
(1)本法のいかなる規定にかかわらず、次に掲げる行為は登録商標の使用権の侵害に該当しない。(a)商標が何らかの条件又は制限を付して登録されている場合、それらの条件又は制限を考慮して、当該登録の効力が及ばない場所で商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)について販売若しくは取引するため、商品若しくは役務に関しかかる効力の範囲外にある市場へ輸出するため、又はかかる効力の範囲外にあるその他の環境において、いかなる態様であれ当該商標を使用する場合。(b)当該商標の所有者又は登録使用権者に関連する商品若しくは役務の取引に係わる者によってそれらの商品、それらの商品から構成される大量品(バルク)、又は役務、若しくはそれらの役務の集合の利用を許諾受けた使用、又は、登録所有者又は利用権者から許諾を受けた使用の範囲内における当該商標の使用である場合。ただし、登録所有者又は使用権者が後にそれを解消又は抹消しない限り、又はどの時点においても明示黙示を問わず当該商標の使用を承諾している限りにおいてとする。(c)本法に基づく登録により、(i)他の商品若しくは役務の一部を構成するように、又は他の商品若しくは役務に随伴するものとして認められた商品又は役務に関連してある者により設定された範囲内における商標の使用である場合。(ii)登録商標の使用が、本法に基づき登録された2以上の互いに同一又は非常に似ている商標の一つとして、本法に基づき登録により付与された商標の使用権の行使である場合。 - 特許庁 - I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business.
私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。 - 金融庁 - Article 20 Where a local public entity specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications has, pursuant to the provision of Article 6 of the Local Tax Act (Act No. 226 of 1950), exempted a business operator who has established facilities for a specified business specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications in an agreed cluster zone, in accordance with the approved plan for establishing new business facilities (limited to a business operator who conducts a business in designated cluster industries specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications) from paying real property acquisition tax for acquiring houses to be used for said facilities or the site thereof or fixed asset taxes for houses or structures to be used for said facilities or the site thereof, or has imposed unequal taxation related to such local taxes, and when these measures are found to fall under cases specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, the base amount of income of said local public entity for each fiscal year under Article 14 of the Local Allocation Tax Act (Act No. 211 of 1950) shall be the amount obtained by deducting the partial amount of income decreases of said local public entity for said each fiscal year (for decreases due to those measures concerning fixed asset tax, limited to decreases for three years after the first fiscal year in which said measures were taken), calculated as specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, from the original base amount of income under the same Article of said local public entity for each said fiscal year (where those measures are taken on or after the date specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, for the fiscal year following each said fiscal year in which each of the income decreases occurred), notwithstanding the provision of the same Article.
第二十条 地方税法（昭和二十五年法律第二百二十六号）第六条の規定により、総務省令で定める地方公共団体が、承認企業立地計画に従って特定事業のための施設のうち総務省令で定めるものを同意集積区域内に設置した事業者（指定集積業種であって総務省令で定めるものに属する事業を行う者に限る。）について、当該施設の用に供する家屋若しくはその敷地である土地の取得に対する不動産取得税若しくは当該施設の用に供する家屋若しくは構築物若しくはこれらの敷地である土地に対する固定資産税を課さなかった場合又はこれらの地方税に係る不均一の課税をした場合において、これらの措置が総務省令で定める場合に該当するものと認められるときは、地方交付税法（昭和二十五年法律第二百十一号）第十四条の規定による当該地方公共団体の各年度における基準財政収入額は、同条の規定にかかわらず、当該地方公共団体の当該各年度分の減収額（固定資産税に関するこれらの措置による減収額にあっては、これらの措置がされた最初の年度以降三箇年度におけるものに限る。）のうち総務省令で定めるところにより算定した額を同条の規定による当該地方公共団体の当該各年度（これらの措置が総務省令で定める日以後において行われたときは、当該減収額について当該各年度の翌年度）における基準財政収入額となるべき額から控除した額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6(1) of the Act may deem that the amount obtained by adding the amount of income calculated, with regard to the amount of income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations concerning corporate income taxes of the state of the head office of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. (where there are two or more laws and regulations concerning the said corporate income taxes, pursuant to the provisions of the principal ones; hereinafter referred to as the "laws and regulations of the state of the head office" in this paragraph), (where the provisions of Article 66-4(1) or Article 68-88(1) of the Act are applied to a transaction between the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. and the said domestic corporation, the amount of income calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in these provisions), and the sum of the amount listed in item (i) to item (xiii) pertaining to the said calculated amount of income and then deducting therefrom the amount listed in item (xiii) and item (xiv) pertaining to the said calculated amount of income (where the amount calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office proves to be a loss, the said amount shall be the remaining amount after deducting the sum of the said amount of loss and the amount listed in item (xiv) to item (xvi) pertaining to the said calculated amount from the sum of the amounts listed in item (i) to item (xiii) pertaining to the said calculated amount) shall be the amount calculated in accordance with the standards specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 66-6(2)(ii) of the Act:
２ 法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人は、前項の規定にかかわらず、特定外国子会社等の各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、当該特定外国子会社等の本店所在地国の法人所得税に関する法令（当該法人所得税に関する法令が二以上ある場合には、そのうち主たる法人所得税に関する法令をいう。以下この項において「本店所在地国の法令」という。）の規定により計算した所得の金額（当該特定外国子会社等と当該内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十六条の四第一項又は第六十八条の八十八第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引がこれらの規定に規定する独立企業間価格で行われたものとして本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した場合に算出される所得の金額）に当該所得の金額に係る第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額から当該所得の金額に係る第十三号及び第十四号に掲げる金額の合計額を控除した残額（本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した金額が欠損の金額となる場合には、当該計算した金額に係る第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額から当該欠損の金額に当該計算した金額に係る第十四号から第十六号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額を控除した残額）をもつて法第六十六条の六第二項第二号に規定する政令で定める基準により計算した金額とすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 10 (1) Notwithstanding Article 9(1) or (2), an applicant for design registration may obtain design registration of a design that is similar to another design selected from the applicant's own designs either for which an application for design registration has been filed or for which design registration has been granted (hereinafter the selected design is referred to as the "Principal Design" and a design similar to it is referred to as a "Related Design"), if the filing date of the application for design registration of the Related Design (or when the application for design registration of the Related Design contains a priority claim under Article 43(1), 43-2(1) or 43-2(2) of the Patent Act (Act No. 121 of 1959) as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 15 of this Act, the filing date of the earliest application, the filing date of an application that is deemed to be the earliest application under Article 4.C(4) of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of March 20, 1883, as revised at Brussels on December 14, 1900, at Washington on June 2, 1911, at Hague on November 6, 1925, at London on June 2, 1934, at Lisbon on October 31, 1958, and at Stockholm on July 14, 1967, or the filing date of an application that is recognized as the earliest application under Article 4.(A)2 of the Paris Convention, hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) is on or after the filing date of the application for design registration of the Principal Design and before the date when the design bulletin in which the application for design registration of the Principal Design is published under Article 20(3) (except for a design bulletin in which the matters listed in Article 20(3)(iv) were published under Article 20(4)) is issued.
第十条 意匠登録出願人は、自己の意匠登録出願に係る意匠又は自己の登録意匠のうちから選択した一の意匠（以下「本意匠」という。）に類似する意匠（以下「関連意匠」という。）については、当該関連意匠の意匠登録出願の日（第十五条において準用する特許法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十一号）第四十三条第一項又は第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う意匠登録出願にあつては、最初の出願若しくは千九百年十二月十四日にブラッセルで、千九百十一年六月二日にワシントンで、千九百二十五年十一月六日にヘーグで、千九百三十四年六月二日にロンドンで、千九百五十八年十月三十一日にリスボンで及び千九百六十七年七月十四日にストックホルムで改正された工業所有権の保護に関する千八百八十三年三月二十日のパリ条約第四条Ｃ（４）の規定により最初の出願とみなされた出願又は同条Ａ（２）の規定により最初の出願と認められた出願の日。以下この項において同じ。）がその本意匠の意匠登録出願の日以後であつて、第二十条第三項の規定によりその本意匠の意匠登録出願が掲載された意匠公報（同条第四項の規定により同条第三項第四号に掲げる事項が掲載されたものを除く。）の発行の日前である場合に限り、第九条第一項又は第二項の規定にかかわらず、意匠登録を受けることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 13 (1) An Insured Person for whom it is determined that his or her domicile has changed to a location of one of the following facilities (herein referred to as "Facility Subject to Domicile Exception") and is located by admission or residence (herein referred to as "Admission, etc.") in said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception (an Insured Person for whom it is determined that his or her domicile has changed to a location where said Facility is located by moving into said Facility as listed in item (iii) is limited to a person for whom the admission measures are pursuant to the provisions of Article 11, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Public Aid for the Aged Act; hereinafter referred to as "Insured Person Subject to Domicile Exception" in this Article) and for whom it is determined to have had domicile in another Municipality (a Municipality other than the Municipality where said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception is located) at the time of moving in for Admission, etc., at said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception, shall be an Insured Person of Long-Term Care Insurance provided by said other Municipality of prior domicile, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9; however, provided that this provision shall not apply to an Insured Person Subject to Domicile Exception who moved in for Admission, etc., into two or more of a said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception, and said Person is determined to have moved consecutively from one said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception in which said Insured Person was admitted immediately prior to the said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception where said Insured Person is currently residing for Admission, etc. (herein referred to as the "Facility of First Prior Admission of an Insured Person" in this paragraph) into a Facility Subject to Domicile Exception in which said Insured Person is currently residing (herein referred to as the "Facility of Current Admission of an Insured Person" in this paragraph and the following paragraph) (collectively herein referred to as "Specified Continuous Admission of an Insured Person" in the following paragraph):
第十三条 次に掲げる施設（以下「住所地特例対象施設」という。）に入所又は入居（以下この条において「入所等」という。）をすることにより当該住所地特例対象施設の所在する場所に住所を変更したと認められる被保険者（第三号に掲げる施設に入所することにより当該施設の所在する場所に住所を変更したと認められる被保険者にあっては、老人福祉法第十一条第一項第一号の規定による入所措置がとられた者に限る。以下この条において「住所地特例対象被保険者」という。）であって、当該住所地特例対象施設に入所等をした際他の市町村（当該住所地特例対象施設が所在する市町村以外の市町村をいう。）の区域内に住所を有していたと認められるものは、第九条の規定にかかわらず、当該他の市町村が行う介護保険の被保険者とする。ただし、二以上の住所地特例対象施設に継続して入所等をしている住所地特例対象被保険者であって、現に入所等をしている住所地特例対象施設（以下この項及び次項において「現入所施設」という。）に入所等をする直前に入所等をしていた住所地特例対象施設（以下この項において「直前入所施設」という。）及び現入所施設のそれぞれに入所等をすることにより直前入所施設及び現入所施設のそれぞれの所在する場所に順次住所を変更したと認められるもの（次項において「特定継続入所被保険者」という。）については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2 of this Article, interest arising in a Contracting State shall be taxable only in the other Contracting State if: (a) the interest is beneficially owned by the Government of that other Contracting State, apolitical subdivision or local authority thereof, or the central bank of that other Contracting State or any institution wholly owned by that Government; (b) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State with respect to debt-claims guaranteed, insured or indirectly financed by the Government of that other Contracting State, a political subdivision or local authority thereof, or the central bank of that other Contracting State or any institution wholly owned by that Government; (c) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State that is either: (i) a bank; (ii) an insurance company; (iii) a securities dealer; or (iv) any other enterprise, provided that in the three taxable years preceding the taxable year in which the interest is paid, the enterprise derives more than 50 per cent of its liabilities from the issuance of bonds in the financial markets or from taking deposits at interest, and more than 50 percent of the assets of the enterprise consist of debt-claims against persons that do not have with the resident a relationship described in subparagraphs (a) or (b) of paragraph 1 of Article 9 of this Convention; (d) the interest is beneficially owned by a pension fund or pension scheme that is a resident of that other Contracting State, provided that such interest is not derived from the carrying on of a business, directly or indirectly, by such pension fund or pension scheme; or (e) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State and paid with respect to indebtedness arising as a part of the sale on credit by a resident of that other Contracting State of equipment or merchandise.
２の規定にかかわらず、一方の締約国内において生ずる利子であって、次のいずれかの場合に該当するものについては、他方の締約国においてのみ租税を課することができる。(a)当該利子の受益者が、当該他方の締約国の政府、当該他方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、当該他方の締約国の中央銀行又は当該他方の締約国の政府が全面的に所有する機関である場合(b)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者であって、当該利子が、当該他方の締約国の政府、当該他方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、当該他方の締約国の中央銀行又は当該他方の締約国の政府が全面的に所有する機関によって保証された債権、これらによって保険の引受けが行われた債権又はこれらによる間接融資に係る債権に関して支払われる場合(c)当該利子の受益者が、次のいずれかに該当する当該他方の締約国の居住者である場合(i)銀行(ii)保険会社(iii)証券会社(iv)(i)から(iii)までに掲げるもの以外の企業で、当該利子の支払が行われる課税年度の直前の三課税年度において、その負債の五十パーセントを超える部分が金融市場において発行された債券又は有利子預金から成り、かつ、その資産の五十パーセントを超える部分が当該居住者と第九条１(a)又は(b)にいう 関係を有しない者に対する信用に係る債権から成るもの(d)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者である年金基金又は年金計画であって、当該利子が、当該年金基金又は年金計画が直接又は間接に事業を遂行することにより取得されたものでない場合(e)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者であって、当該利子が、当該他方の締約国の居住者により行われる信用供与による設備又は物品の販売の一環として生ずる債権に関して支払われる場合 - 財務省 - Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2, interest arising in a Contracting State shall be taxable only in the other Contracting State if: (a) the interest is beneficially owned by that other Contracting State, a political subdivision or local authority thereof, or the central bank of that other Contracting State or any institution wholly owned by that other Contracting State; (b) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State with respect to debt-claims guaranteed, insured or indirectly financed by the Government of that other Contracting State, a political subdivision or local authority thereof, or the central bank of that other Contracting State or any institution wholly owned by that other Contracting State; (c) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State that is either: (i) a bank (including an investment bank); (ii) an insurance company; (iii) a registered securities dealer; or (iv) any other enterprise, provided that in the three taxable years preceding the taxable year in which the interest is paid, the enterprise derives more than 50 percent of its liabilities from the issuance of bonds in the financial markets or from taking deposits at interest, and more than 50percent of the assets of the enterprise consist of debt-claims against persons that do not have with the resident a relationship described in subparagraph (a) or (b) of paragraph 1 of Article 9; (d) the interest is beneficially owned by a pension fund that is a resident of that other Contracting State, provided that such interest is not derived from the carrying on of a business, directly or indirectly, by such pension fund; or (e) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State and paid with respect to indebtedness arising as a part of the sale on credit by a resident of that other Contracting State of equipment or merchandise.
２の規定にかかわらず、一方の締約国内において生ずる利子であって、次のいずれかの場合に該当するものについては、他方の締約国においてのみ租税を課することができる。(a)当該利子の受益者が、当該他方の締約国、当該他方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、当該他方の締約国の中央銀行又は当該他方の締約国が全面的に所有する機関である場合(b)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者であって、当該利子が、当該他方の締約国の政府、当該他方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、当該他方の締約国の中央銀行又は当該他方の締約国が全面的に所有する機関によって保証された債権、これらによって保険の引受けが行われた債権又はこれらによる間接融資に係る債権に関して支払われる場合(c)当該利子の受益者が、次のいずれかに該当する当該他方の締約国の居住者である場合(i)銀行（投資銀行を含む。)(ii)保険会社(iii)登録を受けた証券会社(iv)(i)から(iii)までに掲げるもの以外の企業で、当該利子の支払が行われる課税年度の直前の三課税年度において、その負債の五十パーセントを超える部分が金融市場における債券の発行又は有利子預金から成り、かつ、その資産の五十パーセントを超える部分が当該居住者と第九条１(a)又は(b)にいう関係を有しない者に対する信用に係る債権から成るもの(d)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者である年金基金であって、当該利子が、当該年金基金が直接又は間接に事業を遂行することにより取得されたものでない場合(e)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者であって、当該利子が、当該他方の締約国の居住者により行われる信用供与による設備又は物品の販売の一環として生ずる債権に関して支払われる場合 - 財務省 - 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2, interest arising in a Contracting State shall be taxable only in the other Contracting State if: a) the interest is beneficially owned by the Government of that other Contracting State, a political subdivision or local authority thereof, or the central bank of that other Contracting State or any institution owned by that Government; b) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State with respect to debt-claims guaranteed, insured or indirectly financed by the Government of that other Contracting State, a political subdivision or local authority thereof, or the central bank of that other Contracting State or any institution owned by that Government; c) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State that is either: (i) a bank; (ii) an insurance company; (iii) a securities company; or (iv) any other enterprise, provided that in the three taxable years preceding the taxable year in which the interest is paid, the enterprise derives more than 50 per cent of its liabilities from the issuance of bonds in the financial markets or from taking deposits at interest, and more than 50 per cent of the assets of the enterprise consist of debt-claims against persons that do not have with the enterprise a relationship described in subparagraph a) or b) of paragraph 1 of Article 9; d) the interest is beneficially owned by a pension fund that is a resident of that other Contracting State, provided that such interest is not derived from the carrying on of a business, directly or indirectly, by such pension fund; or e) the interest is beneficially owned by a resident of that other Contracting State and paid with respect to indebtedness arising as a consequence of the sale on credit by a resident of that other Contracting State of any equipment, merchandise or service.
３ ２の規定にかかわらず、一方の締約国内において生ずる利子であって、次のいずれかの場合に該当するものについては、他方の締約国においてのみ租税を課することができる。(a)当該利子の受益者が、当該他方の締約国の政府、当該他方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、当該他方の締約国の中央銀行又は当該他方の締約国の政府が所有する機関である場合(b)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者であって、当該利子が、当該他方の締約国の政府、当該他方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、当該他方の締約国の中央銀行又は当該他方の締約国の政府が所有する機関によって保証された債権、これらによって保険の引受けが行われた債権又はこれらによる間接融資に係る債権に関して支払われる場合(c)当該利子の受益者が、次のいずれかに該当する当該他方の締約国の居住者である場合(i)銀行(ii)保険会社(iii)証券会社(iv)(i)から(iii)までに掲げるもの以外の企業で、当該利子の支払が行われる課税年度の直前の三課税年度において、その負債の五十パーセントを超える部分が金融市場において発行された債券又は有利子預金から成り、かつ、その資産の五十パーセントを超える部分が当該企業と第九条１(a)又は(b)に規定する関係を有しない者に対する信用に係る債権から成るもの(d)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者である年金基金であって、当該利子が、当該年金基金が直接又は間接に事業を遂行することにより取得されたものでない場合(e)当該利子の受益者が当該他方の締約国の居住者であって、当該利子が、当該他方の締約国の居住者により行われる信用供与による設備、物品の販売又は役務の提供の結果として生ずる債権に関して支払われる場合 - 財務省 - (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a consolidated corporation listed in the items of Article 68-90(1) of the Act may deem that the amount obtained by adding the amount of income calculated, with regard to the income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations concerning corporate income taxes of the state of the head office of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. (where there are two or more laws and regulations concerning the said corporate income taxes, pursuant to the provisions of the principal ones; hereinafter referred to as the "laws and regulations of the state of the head office" in this paragraph), (where the provisions of Article 68-88(1) or Article 66-4(1) of the Act are applied to a transaction between the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. and the said consolidated corporation (including other consolidated corporations which have the consolidated full controlling interest with the said consolidated corporation) or domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6(1) of the Act, the amount of income calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in the said paragraph), and the sum of the amount listed in item (i) to item (xiii) pertaining to the said calculated amount of income and then deducting therefrom the amount listed in item (xiv) to item (xvi) pertaining to the said calculated amount of income (where the amount calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office proves to be a loss, the said amount shall be the remaining amount after deducting the sum of the said amount of loss and the amount listed in item (xiv) to item (xvi) pertaining to the said calculated amount from the sum of the amounts listed in item (i) to item (xiii) pertaining to the said calculated amount) shall be the amount calculated in accordance with the standards specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 68-90(2)(ii) of the Act; provided, however, that this shall apply only when the said other consolidated corporations are not subject to the provisions of the preceding paragraph with regard to the said calculated amount pertaining to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc.:
２ 法第六十八条の九十第一項各号に掲げる連結法人は、前項の規定にかかわらず、特定外国子会社等の各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、当該特定外国子会社等の本店所在地国の法人所得税に関する法令（当該法人所得税に関する法令が二以上ある場合には、そのうち主たる法人所得税に関する法令をいう。以下この項において「本店所在地国の法令」という。）の規定により計算した所得の金額（当該特定外国子会社等と当該連結法人（当該連結法人との間に連結完全支配関係がある他の連結法人を含む。）又は法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十八条の八十八第一項又は第六十六条の四第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引が同項に規定する独立企業間価格で行われたものとして本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した場合に算出される所得の金額）に当該所得の金額に係る第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額から当該所得の金額に係る第十四号から第十六号までに掲げる金額の合計額を控除した残額（本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した金額が欠損の金額となる場合には、当該計算した金額に係る第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額から当該欠損の金額に当該計算した金額に係る第十四号から第十六号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額を控除した残額）をもつて法第六十八条の九十第二項第二号に規定する政令で定める基準により計算した金額とすることができる。ただし、当該他の連結法人が当該特定外国子会社等に係る当該計算した金額につき前項の規定の適用を受けない場合に限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
- 金融庁
- Copyright(C) 2026 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
- ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
- 経済産業省
- Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
- 特許庁
- Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
- 財務省
- Copyright(C) 財務省
※この記事は財務省ホームページの情報を転載しております。内容には仮訳のものも含まれており、今後内容に変更がある可能性がございます。
財務省は利用者が当ホームページの情報を用いて行う一切の行為について、何ら責任を負うものではありません。
