「To exercise」を含む例文一覧(3556)

<前へ 1 2 .... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 次へ>
  • (6) Article 97(3) of this Act and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847(2), Article 849(2) and (5), and Article 851) (Action for Pursuing the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to actions for the return of benefits under paragraph (3). In this case, the phrase "A shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less than One Unit who is unable to exercise right pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189(2)) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more)" in Article 847(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A Specified Equity Member or a Preferred Equity Member who has held Preferred Equity continuously for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period or longer)," the term "shareholder" in Article 847(3) to (5) inclusive and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    6 第九十七条第三項及び会社法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定は、第三項の利益の返還を求める訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き株式を有する株主(第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。)」とあるのは「特定社員又は六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き優先出資を有する優先出資社員」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員又は優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (1) Each Limited Partner shall not disclose or divulge to any third party or use other than for the purpose set forth in this Agreement: (i) information received from the Partnership, other Partners or any Portfolio Company in connection with the Partnership and (ii) information (including the Financial Statements and Semi-annual Financial Statements set forth in Article 25) acquired pursuant to this Agreement, based on its status as a Limited Partner or upon exercise of any right given to a Limited Partner under this Agreement; provided, however, that such information shall not include information that: (i) is already in the public domain at the time of receipt; (ii) is held by such Limited Partner at the time of receipt; (iii) enters the public domain due to any event not attributable to such Limited Partner after its receipt; (iv) is duly acquired by such Limited Partner from a third party that does not owe any confidential duty; and (v) is approved by the General Partner to be disclosed.
    1. 有限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)本組合に関して本組合、他の組合員若しくは投資先事業者等から受領した情報、及び(ⅱ)本契約に基づき又は有限責任組合員たる地位に基づき若しくは有限責任組合員に本契約において与えられたいずれかの権利の行使により取得した情報(第25 条に定める財務諸表等及び半期財務諸表等を含む。)を、第三者に対し開示又は漏洩してはならないものとし、また、かかる情報を本契約に定められる目的以外のために使用してはならないものとする。但し、かかる情報には、(ⅰ)受領時に既に公知であったもの、(ⅱ)受領時に当該有限責任組合員が既に保有していたもの、(ⅲ)当該有限責任組合員が受領した後に当該有限責任組合員の責に帰すべき事由によらず公知となったもの、(ⅳ)当該有限責任組合員が、秘密保持義務を負うことなく、第三者から正当に入手したもの及び(ⅴ)無限責任組合員が開示することを承認したものは含まれないものとする。 - 経済産業省
  • (3) In the cases where the Stock Company Absorbed in Absorption-type Merger or the Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company in Share Exchange is a Company with Classes of Shares, if all or part of the Consideration for the Merger, etc. are Shares with a Restriction on Transfer, etc. (meaning Shares with a Restriction on Transfer and those prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as being equivalent thereto; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Chapter), the Absorption-type Merger or the Share Exchange shall not become effective without a resolution of a Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of the class of shares subject to the allotment of the Shares with a Restriction on Transfer, etc. (excluding Shares with a Restriction on Transfer) (in cases where there are two or more classes of shares relating to such Class Shareholders, the respective Class Meetings constituted by Class Shareholders categorized by the class of such two or more classes of shares); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where there is no Class Shareholder who is able to exercise a voting right at such Class Meeting.
    3 吸収合併消滅株式会社又は株式交換完全子会社が種類株式発行会社である場合において、合併対価等の全部又は一部が譲渡制限株式等(譲渡制限株式その他これに準ずるものとして法務省令で定めるものをいう。以下この章において同じ。)であるときは、吸収合併又は株式交換は、当該譲渡制限株式等の割当てを受ける種類の株式(譲渡制限株式を除く。)の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会(当該種類株主に係る株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあっては、当該二以上の株式の種類別に区分された種類株主を構成員とする各種類株主総会)の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 265 (1) In the case where an Association has violated this Act, an order based on this Act or a disposition by the competent minister based on this Act or its articles of incorporation or other rules (hereinafter referred to as "This Act, etc." in this Article) or, in the case where, regardless of the fact that an Association Member has violated This Act, etc., said Association has failed to exercise its powers recognized pursuant to this Act, an order based on this Act or its articles of incorporation or has failed to take any other necessary measures for having said Association Member observe this Act, etc., if the competent minister finds it necessary and appropriate for achieving fair and smooth brokerage of Transactions on a Commodity Market, etc. or for protecting customers, he/she may rescind the approval of the establishment of said Association, order the suspension of the whole or a part of its business for a fixed period not exceeding one year, order the prohibition of a part of its business or order the dismissal of its officer.
    第二百六十五条 主務大臣は、協会がこの法律、この法律に基づく命令若しくはこの法律に基づいてする主務大臣の処分若しくは定款その他の規則(以下この条において「この法律等」という。)に違反した場合又は協会員がこの法律等に違反する行為をしたにもかかわらず、当該協会員に対しこの法律等を遵守させるために当該協会がこの法律、この法律に基づく命令若しくは当該定款により認められた権能の行使その他必要な措置をすることを怠つた場合において、商品市場における取引等の受託を公正かつ円滑ならしめ、又は委託者を保護するため必要かつ適当であると認めるときは、その設立の認可を取り消し、一年以内の期間を定めてその業務の全部若しくは一部の停止を命じ、その業務の一部の禁止を命じ、又はその役員の解任を命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 41-4 Where an Association has violated laws and regulations, a disposition made by a government agency under laws and regulations, or its Articles of Incorporation, etc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Laws and Regulations, etc." in this Article) or where, despite the fact that an Association member has violated Laws and Regulations, etc., the Association has failed to exercise the powers vested therein under this Act, under any order issued under this Act, or under its Articles of Incorporation, etc., or where it has failed to take any other necessary measures for having that Association member observe Laws and Regulations, etc., the Prime Minister may, when he/she finds it necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of Persons Seeking Funds, etc., rescind the authorization of the establishment of the Association, specify a period of no longer than one year and order the suspension of the Association's business in whole or in part, order a change in its operational method or prohibition of its business in part, order the dismissal of its officer, or order any other necessary measures specified in its Articles of Incorporation, etc.
    第四十一条の四 内閣総理大臣は、協会が法令、法令に基づく行政官庁の処分若しくは当該協会の定款等(以下この条において「法令等」という。)に違反した場合又は協会員が法令等に違反する行為をしたにもかかわらず、当該協会員に対し法令等を遵守させるために協会がこの法律、この法律に基づく命令若しくは定款等により認められた権能を行使せずその他必要な措置をとることを怠つた場合において、資金需要者等の利益の保護のため必要かつ適当であると認めるときは、その設立の認可を取り消し、一年以内の期間を定めてその業務の全部若しくは一部の停止を命じ、その業務の方法の変更若しくはその業務の一部の禁止を命じ、その役員の解任を命じ、又は定款等に定める必要な措置をとることを命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (1) In the case where an Association has violated this Act, an order based on this Act or a disposition by the competent minister based on this Act or its articles of incorporation or other rules (hereinafter referred to as "This Act, etc." in this Article) or, in the case where, regardless of the fact that an Association Member has violated This Act, etc., said Association has failed to exercise its powers recognized pursuant to this Act, an order based on this Act or its articles of incorporation or has failed to take any other necessary measures for having said Association Member observe this Act, etc., if the competent minister finds it necessary and appropriate for achieving fair and smooth acceptance of the consignment of Transactions on a Commodity Market, etc. or for protecting customers, he/she may rescind the approval of the establishment of said Association, order the suspension of the whole or a part of its business for a fixed period not exceeding one year, order the prohibition of a part of its business or order the dismissal of its officer.
    1 主務大臣は、協会がこの法律、この法律に基づく命令若しくはこの法律に基づいてする主務大臣の処分若しくは定款その他の規則(以下この条において「この法律等」という。)に違反した場合又は協会員がこの法律等に違反する行為をしたにもかかわらず、当該協会員に対しこの法律等を遵守させるために当該協会がこの法律、この法律に基づく命令若しくは当該定款により認められた権能の行使その他必要な措置をすることを怠つた場合において、商品市場における取引等の受託を公正かつ円滑ならしめ、又は委託者を保護するため必要かつ適当であると認めるときは、その設立の認可を取り消し、一年以内の期間を定めてその業務の全部若しくは一部の停止を命じ、その業務の一部の禁止を命じ、又はその役員の解任を命ずることができる。 - 経済産業省
  • (xiii) Development activities executed as the exercise of right concerning the relevant land by persons who, at the time when city plans concerning urbanization control areas are fixed or when the urbanization control areas are expanded by changing the relevant city plans, had land or held rights other than ownership concerning the use of land for the purpose of building buildings for own dwelling or business or of constructing Category 1 special structures for own business and who had notified prefectural governors of such matters as specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism within six months counting from the date of the decision or change of the relevant city plans in accordance with such purpose (which shall be limited to development activities executed within the period specified by Cabinet Order).
    十三 区域区分に関する都市計画が決定され、又は当該都市計画を変更して市街化調整区域が拡張された際、自己の居住若しくは業務の用に供する建築物を建築し、又は自己の業務の用に供する第一種特定工作物を建設する目的で土地又は土地の利用に関する所有権以外の権利を有していた者で、当該都市計画の決定又は変更の日から起算して六月以内に国土交通省令で定める事項を都道府県知事に届け出たものが、当該目的に従つて、当該土地に関する権利の行使として行う開発行為(政令で定める期間内に行うものに限る。) - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (4) In the case where a Incorporated Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is a company issuing classified shares, if the Shares, etc. delivered to members of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger are shares of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, the Absorption-Type Merger shall not come into effect without a resolution of a general meeting of class shareholders consisting of class shareholders of the classes of shares set forth in Article 142, item (ii) (a) (limited to transfer restricted shares for which the provisions of the articles of incorporation set forth in Article 199, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act do not exist); provided, however, that this shall not apply if there are no shareholders who are entitled to exercise their voting rights present at said general meeting of class shareholders.
    4 吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所が種類株式発行会社である場合において、吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の会員に対して交付する株式等が吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の株式であるときは、吸収合併は、第百四十二条第二号イの種類の株式(譲渡制限株式であつて、会社法第百九十九条第四項の定款の定めがないものに限る。)の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会(当該種類株主に係る株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあつては、当該二以上の株式の種類別に区分された種類株主を構成員とする各種類株主総会)の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) The provisions of Article 110(1) and (2) (Provision of Voting Forms and Reference Documents for a Beneficiaries Meeting), Article 115(2) and (3) (Voting in Writing), and Article 116 (Voting by Electromagnetic Means) of the Trust Act, and the provisions of Article 311(3) and (4) (Voting in Writing) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the exercise of voting rights in writing set forth in the preceding paragraph. In this case, the phrase "The convener shall, when giving the notice set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 110(1) of the Trust Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "In the case of a Specific Purpose Trust, the convener shall, when giving notice of a Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meeting," the phrase "paragraph (2) of the preceding Article" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 242(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    2 信託法第百十条第一項及び第二項(受益者集会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第百十五条第二項及び第三項(書面による議決権の行使)並びに第百十六条(電磁的方法による議決権の行使)並びに会社法第三百十一条第三項及び第四項(書面による議決権の行使)の規定は、前項の書面による議決権の行使について準用する。この場合において、信託法第百十条第一項中「招集者は、前条第一項」とあるのは「特定目的信託にあっては、招集者は、権利者集会の招集」と、同条第二項中「前条第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百四十二条第三項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) Where a resolution on a proposed rehabilitation plan shall be adopted separately by holders of rehabilitation claims and holders of consensually-subordinated rehabilitation claims pursuant to the provision of the main clause of Article 172-3(2), if it is obvious that for a proposed rehabilitation plan, the consent listed in either item of paragraph (1) of said Article will not be obtained among either of the holders of rehabilitation claims or holders of consensually-subordinated rehabilitation claims, the court, upon the petition of the person who is to prepare a proposed rehabilitation plan, may permit that a proposed rehabilitation plan will be prepared by specifying, in advance, the clauses prescribed in the preceding paragraph in the interest of the holders of the category of claims among whom consent obviously will not be obtained. In this case, the holders of the category of claims among whom consent obviously will not be obtained may not exercise their voting rights to adopt a resolution on the proposed rehabilitation plan.
    2 第百七十二条の三第二項本文の規定により再生計画案の決議を再生債権を有する者と約定劣後再生債権を有する者とに分かれて行うべき場合において、再生計画案について、再生債権を有する者又は約定劣後再生債権を有する者のいずれかについて同条第一項各号のいずれかに掲げる同意を得られないことが明らかなものがあるときは、裁判所は、再生計画案の作成者の申立てにより、あらかじめ、その同意を得られないことが明らかな種類の債権を有する者のために前項に規定する条項を定めて、再生計画案を作成することを許可することができる。この場合において、その同意を得られないことが明らかな種類の債権を有する者は、当該再生計画案の決議において議決権を行使することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (4) In the case where a Incorporated Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is a company issuing classified shares of stock, if the Shares of Stock, etc. delivered to members of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger are shares of stock of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, the Absorption-Type Merger shall not come into effect without a resolution of a general meeting of class shareholders consisting of class shareholders of the classes of shares of stock set forth in Article 142, item 2 (a) (limited to transfer restricted shares of stock for which the provisions of the articles of incorporation set forth in Article 199, paragraph 4 of the Company Act do not exist); provided, however, that this shall not apply if there are no shareholders who are entitled to exercise their voting rights present at said general meeting of class shareholders.
    4 吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所が種類株式発行会社である場合において、吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の会員に対して交付する株式等が吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の株式であるときは、吸収合併は、第百四十二条第二号イの種類の株式(譲渡制限株式であつて、会社法第百九十九条第四項 の定款の定めがないものに限る。)の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会(当該種類株主に係る株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあつては、当該二以上の株式の種類別に区分された種類株主を構成員とする各種類株主総会)の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 経済産業省
  • (4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    4 会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで(他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止)、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで(第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。)(裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了)、第七編第二章第四節(特別清算に関する訴え)、同編第三章第一節(第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。)(総則)、同章第三節(第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。)(特別清算の手続に関する特則)及び第九百三十八条(第六項を除く。)(特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式(自己株式を除く。)の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の数の株式を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員(社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員(社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資(自己特定出資を除く。)の総口数の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資(自己優先出資を除く。)の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the following acts do not constitute an infringement of the right to the use of a registered 26 trademark- (a) where a trademark is registered subject to any conditions or limitations, the use of the trademark in any manner in relation to goods or services, as the case may be, to be sold or otherwise traded in, in any place, or in relation to goods or services to be exported to any market, or in any other circumstances, to which, having regard to those conditions or limitations, the registration does not extend; (b) by being permitted to use those goods or a bulk of which they form part or services, or a bulk of which they form part by the proprietor of the trademark or any person related to the trade of goods or services in relation with the registered user or to use within the limit of permitted use of the registered proprietor or user, the use of such trademark, unless the registered proprietor or the user subsequently has removed or obliterated it, or has at any time expressly or impliedly consented to the use of the trademark; (c) by registration under this Act- (i) the use of a trademark is within established right by a person in relation to goods or services adapted to form part of, or to be accessory to, other goods or services; (ii) the use of a registered trademark, being one of two or more trademarks registered under this Act which are identical or nearly resemble each other, is in exercise of the right to the use of the trademarks given by registration under this Act.
    (1)本法のいかなる規定にかかわらず、次に掲げる行為は登録商標の使用権の侵害に該当しない。(a)商標が何らかの条件又は制限を付して登録されている場合、それらの条件又は制限を考慮して、当該登録の効力が及ばない場所で商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)について販売若しくは取引するため、商品若しくは役務に関しかかる効力の範囲外にある市場へ輸出するため、又はかかる効力の範囲外にあるその他の環境において、いかなる態様であれ当該商標を使用する場合。(b)当該商標の所有者又は登録使用権者に関連する商品若しくは役務の取引に係わる者によってそれらの商品、それらの商品から構成される大量品(バルク)、又は役務、若しくはそれらの役務の集合の利用を許諾受けた使用、又は、登録所有者又は利用権者から許諾を受けた使用の範囲内における当該商標の使用である場合。ただし、登録所有者又は使用権者が後にそれを解消又は抹消しない限り、又はどの時点においても明示黙示を問わず当該商標の使用を承諾している限りにおいてとする。(c)本法に基づく登録により、(i)他の商品若しくは役務の一部を構成するように、又は他の商品若しくは役務に随伴するものとして認められた商品又は役務に関連してある者により設定された範囲内における商標の使用である場合。(ii)登録商標の使用が、本法に基づき登録された2以上の互いに同一又は非常に似ている商標の一つとして、本法に基づき登録により付与された商標の使用権の行使である場合。 - 特許庁
  • Article 2 (1) The term "Whistleblowing" as used in this Act shall mean whistleblowing made by a worker (which shall mean worker as provided for in Article 9 of the Labor Standards Act (Act No. 49 of 1947); the same shall apply hereinafter), without a purpose of obtaining an wrongful gain, a purpose of causing damages to others, or any other wrongful purpose, about Reportable Fact that has been occurred, is being occurred or is about to be occurred by "Business Operator" (which shall mean any of the following business operators (which shall mean juridical person, other organization and individual who operates a business)), or such persons as officer, employee or agent in the workplace where the worker is occupied in performing the Business Operator's business activities, to the said Business Operator or the person designated by the said Business Operator in advance (hereinafter referred to as "Business Operator, etc."), to an Administrative Organ with the authority to impose disposition (which shall mean an order, rescission, and other acts involving the exercise of public authority; the same shall apply hereinafter) or recommendation, etc. (which shall mean a recommendation and other acts which are not disposition; the same shall apply hereinafter) upon the said Reportable Fact, or to any person who are recognized to be necessary to do whistleblowing to the said Reportable Fact in order to prevent the occurrence thereof or the spread of damage caused thereby (including person who suffers or might suffer damage from the said Reportable Fact, but excluding any person who might cause damages to the competitive position or any other legitimate interests of the Business Operator; the same shall apply in Item (iii) of the following Article.).
    第二条 この法律において「公益通報」とは、労働者(労働基準法(昭和二十二年法律第四十九号)第九条に規定する労働者をいう。以下同じ。)が、不正の利益を得る目的、他人に損害を加える目的その他の不正の目的でなく、その労務提供先(次のいずれかに掲げる事業者(法人その他の団体及び事業を行う個人をいう。以下同じ。)をいう。以下同じ。)又は当該労務提供先の事業に従事する場合におけるその役員、従業員、代理人その他の者について通報対象事実が生じ、又はまさに生じようとしている旨を、当該労務提供先若しくは当該労務提供先があらかじめ定めた者(以下「労務提供先等」という。)、当該通報対象事実について処分(命令、取消しその他公権力の行使に当たる行為をいう。以下同じ。)若しくは勧告等(勧告その他処分に当たらない行為をいう。以下同じ。)をする権限を有する行政機関又はその者に対し当該通報対象事実を通報することがその発生若しくはこれによる被害の拡大を防止するために必要であると認められる者(当該通報対象事実により被害を受け又は受けるおそれがある者を含み、当該労務提供先の競争上の地位その他正当な利益を害するおそれがある者を除く。次条第三号において同じ。)に通報することをいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (4) In cases where a Specific Purpose Company acquires the Specified Equity set forth in paragraph (2), if the total sum of the amounts listed in Article 114(1)(ii) to (iv) inclusive as of the time when the approval set forth in Article 104(2) has been obtained (in the case prescribed in the first sentence of paragraph (4) of that Article, the time when the report set forth in the second sentence of that paragraph has been made) with respect to the financial statements prescribed in Article 102(2) pertaining to the business year that contains the date of said acquisition (if the business year immediately preceding such business year is not the Most Recent Business Year (the latest of the business years for which approval under Article 104(2) has been obtained (in the case prescribed in the first sentence of paragraph (4) of that Article, the time when the report set forth in the second sentence of that paragraph has been made) with respect to the financial statements prescribed in Article 102(2) relating to each business year; the same shall apply hereinafter), the business year immediately preceding such business year) exceeds the amount set forth in Article 114(1)(i), the directors who performed duties in relation to the acquisition shall jointly and severally have an obligation to pay such excess amount (in cases where such excess amount exceeds the total amount of monies delivered to Specified Members as a result of the acquisition of said Specified Equity, the total amount of such monies) to said Specific Purpose Company; provided, however, that this shall not apply to any director who proves that he/she did not fail to exercise due care with respect to the performance of his/her duties.
    4 特定目的会社が第二項の特定出資の取得をした場合において、当該取得をした日の属する事業年度(その事業年度の直前の事業年度が最終事業年度(各事業年度に係る第百二条第二項に規定する計算書類につき第百四条第二項の承認を受けた場合(同条第四項前段に規定する場合にあっては、同項後段の報告をした場合)における当該各事業年度のうち最も遅いものをいう。以下同じ。)でないときは、その事業年度の直前の事業年度)に係る第百二条第二項に規定する計算書類につき第百四条第二項の承認を受けた時(同条第四項前段に規定する場合にあっては、同項後段の報告をした時)における第百十四条第一項第二号から第四号までに掲げる額の合計額が同項第一号に掲げる額を超えるときは、当該取得に関する職務を行った取締役は、当該特定目的会社に対し、連帯して、その超過額(当該超過額が当該特定出資の取得により特定社員に対して交付した金銭の総額を超える場合にあっては、当該金銭の総額)を支払う義務を負う。ただし、当該取締役がその職務を行うについて注意を怠らなかったことを証明した場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) Every corporation whose total assets (meaning the amount of total assets appearing in the latest balance sheet; the same shall apply hereinafter) exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than two billion yen, and whose total assets, coupled with total assets of subsidiaries of the said corporation, and a corporation in Japan which holds majority of voting rights of all stockholders of the said corporation (hereinafter referred to as "sum of the total assets"), exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than ten billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "stockholding corporation" in this Article), in case that it acquires or holds the stocks (including the stocks held in monetary or security trust, where the stockholding corporation is a settlor or beneficiary and may exercise the voting rights or give instructions to the trustee regarding the exercise of such voting rights) of another corporation in Japan whose total assets exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than one billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "issuing corporation" in this Article), so that the ratio of voting rights pertaining to the stocks acquired or held by the stockholding corporation to voting rights of all stockholders of the issuing corporation is to exceed the percentage figure provided for in a Cabinet Order (in the case that more than one percentage figures are provided for, any of such percentage figures pursuant to the provisions of such Cabinet Order), shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission, a written report on such stocks within thirty days from the date of the relevant exceeding; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the all the issued stocks of issuing corporation is acquired simultaneously with the incorporation, cases where a corporation engaged in banking or insurance business (excluding certain corporations engaged in insurance business as provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article) acquires or holds stocks of other corporations in Japan (excluding those engaged in banking or insurance business and those as otherwise provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article), or cases where a corporation engaged in securities business (excluding securities brokers) acquires or holds stocks in the course of its business.
    2 会社であつて、その総資産の額(最終の貸借対照表による資産の合計金額をいう。以下同じ。)が二十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超え、かつ、当該会社並びに当該会社の子会社及び当該会社の総株主の議決権の過半数を有する国内の会社の総資産の額を合計した額(以下「総資産合計額」という。)が百億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの(以下この条において「株式所有会社」という。)は、他の国内の会社であつてその総資産の額が十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの(以下この項において「株式発行会社」という。)の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合(金銭又は有価証券の信託に係る株式について、自己が、委託者若しくは受益者となり議決権を行使することができる場合又は議決権の行使について受託者に指図を行うことができる場合を含む。)において、株式発行会社の総株主の議決権に占める株式所有会社の当該取得し、又は所有する株式に係る議決権の割合が、百分の十を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める数値(複数の数値を定めた場合にあつては、政令で定めるところにより、それぞれの数値)を超えることとなるときは、公正取引委員会規則で定めるところにより、その超えることとなつた日から三十日以内に、当該株式に関する報告書を公正取引委員会に提出しなければならない。ただし、株式発行会社の発行済の株式の全部をその設立と同時に取得する場合、銀行業又は保険業を営む会社が他の国内の会社(銀行業又は保険業を営む会社その他公正取引委員会規則で定める会社を除く。次条第一項及び第二項において同じ。)の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合及び証券業を営む会社(証券仲介業者を除く。)が業務として株式を取得し、又は所有する場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 15 (1) Among the employers with a contractor who carries out a part of the work in an undertaking executed at one place (where as there exists two or more contracts under which a part of the work in the undertaking is begun, there exist two or more such employers, employer who ordered the earliest contract; hereinafter referred to as the "Principal Employer"), one (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Principal Employer") who carries on an undertaking (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Undertaking") related to construction or other industries prescribed by Cabinet Order, shall, where workers employed by him/her and by his/her contractors (where the work in the said undertaking of the principal employer is carried out under subcontracts of several levels, subcontractors who are party to subsequent subcontractors shall be included; hereinafter referred to as "related contractors") perform work at the said place, appoint an overall safety and health controller in order to prevent industrial accidents which may occur as a result of the work carried out by these workers at the same place, and have him/her direct the work of Principal Safety and Health Supervisors, and at the same time exercise overall control over the matters provided for in each item of paragraph (1) of Article 30; provided that this shall not apply where the number of such workers does not reach the figure provided for by Cabinet Order.
    第十五条 事業者で、一の場所において行う事業の仕事の一部を請負人に請け負わせているもの(当該事業の仕事の一部を請け負わせる契約が二以上あるため、その者が二以上あることとなるときは、当該請負契約のうちの最も先次の請負契約における注文者とする。以下「元方事業者」という。)のうち、建設業その他政令で定める業種に属する事業(以下「特定事業」という。)を行う者(以下「特定元方事業者」という。)は、その労働者及びその請負人(元方事業者の当該事業の仕事が数次の請負契約によつて行われるときは、当該請負人の請負契約の後次のすべての請負契約の当事者である請負人を含む。以下「関係請負人」という。)の労働者が当該場所において作業を行うときは、これらの労働者の作業が同一の場所において行われることによつて生ずる労働災害を防止するため、統括安全衛生責任者を選任し、その者に元方安全衛生管理者の指揮をさせるとともに、第三十条第一項各号の事項を統括管理させなければならない。ただし、これらの労働者の数が政令で定める数未満であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 249 (1) Where a petition for grant of discharge is filed and an order of discontinuance of bankruptcy proceedings under the provision of Article 216(1) is made, an order of discontinuance of bankruptcy proceedings made under the provision of Article 217(1) has become final and binding or an order of termination of bankruptcy proceedings under the provision of Article 220(1) is made, until a judicial decision on said petition becomes final and binding, it is not allowed to, against the bankrupt's property, enforce compulsory execution, provisional seizure or provisional disposition based on a bankruptcy claim, or exercise of a general statutory lien or auction by reason of a right of retention (excluding a right of retention under the provisions of the Commercial Code or the Companies Act) as intended to secure a bankruptcy claim (hereinafter referred to as "compulsory execution based on a bankruptcy claim, etc." in this Article), to file a petition for assets disclosure procedure based on a bankruptcy claim or to enforce a procedure for collection of national tax delinquency against the bankrupt's property, and any procedure for compulsory execution, etc. based on a bankruptcy claim already initiated against the bankrupt's property and assets disclosure procedure based on a bankruptcy claim already initiated against the bankrupt shall be stayed.
    第二百四十九条 免責許可の申立てがあり、かつ、第二百十六条第一項の規定による破産手続廃止の決定、第二百十七条第一項の規定による破産手続廃止の決定の確定又は第二百二十条第一項の規定による破産手続終結の決定があったときは、当該申立てについての裁判が確定するまでの間は、破産者の財産に対する破産債権に基づく強制執行、仮差押え若しくは仮処分若しくは破産債権を被担保債権とする一般の先取特権の実行若しくは留置権(商法又は会社法の規定によるものを除く。)による競売(以下この条において「破産債権に基づく強制執行等」という。)、破産債権に基づく財産開示手続の申立て又は破産者の財産に対する破産債権に基づく国税滞納処分はすることができず、破産債権に基づく強制執行等の手続で破産者の財産に対して既にされているもの及び破産者について既にされている破産債権に基づく財産開示手続は中止する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 465 (1) In cases where a Stock Company carries out the acts listed in any of the following items, if the sum of the amounts listed in item (iii), (iv) and (vi) of Article 461(2) when approval under Article 438(2) (or, in cases provided for in the first sentence of Article 439, approval under Article 436(3)) is obtained with respect to the Financial Statements for the business year that contains the day on which such act is carried out (or, if the business year immediately preceding such business year is not the Most Recent Business Year, the business year immediately preceding such business year) exceeds the amount listed in item (i) of that paragraph, the Executing Persons who performed duties in relation to the acts listed in each such item shall be jointly and severally liable to such Stock Company for payment of such excess amount (or, in cases where such excess amount exceeds the amount listed in each such item, the amount listed in each such item).; provided, however, that this shall not apply in cases where such Executing Persons prove that they did not fail to exercise due care with respect to the performance of their duties:
    第四百六十五条 株式会社が次の各号に掲げる行為をした場合において、当該行為をした日の属する事業年度(その事業年度の直前の事業年度が最終事業年度でないときは、その事業年度の直前の事業年度)に係る計算書類につき第四百三十八条第二項の承認(第四百三十九条前段に規定する場合にあっては、第四百三十六条第三項の承認)を受けた時における第四百六十一条第二項第三号、第四号及び第六号に掲げる額の合計額が同項第一号に掲げる額を超えるときは、当該各号に掲げる行為に関する職務を行った業務執行者は、当該株式会社に対し、連帯して、その超過額(当該超過額が当該各号に定める額を超える場合にあっては、当該各号に定める額)を支払う義務を負う。ただし、当該業務執行者がその職務を行うについて注意を怠らなかったことを証明した場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (i) when the Financial Instruments Exchange violates laws and regulations, a disposition given by government agencies based on laws and regulations, or the articles of incorporation or any other rules; or, despite the fact that a Member, etc. or an Issuer of Securities listed in a Financial Instruments Exchange has violated laws and regulations, a disposition given by government agencies under laws and regulations, or the Financial Instruments Exchange's articles of incorporation, operational rules, brokerage contract rules or any other rules (hereinafter referred to as "Laws and Regulations, etc." in this item), or has committed an act contrary to the fair and equitable principles of transactions specified in the articles of incorporation or any other rules, the Financial Instruments Exchange has failed to exercise its powers vested under this Act, an order given under this Act, or its articles of incorporation or any other rules, or to take any other necessary measures, for having such persons observe the Laws and Regulations, etc. or the fair and equitable principles of transactions: Rescission of the license granted under Article 80(1), issuance of an order of suspension of all or part of its business, specifying a period of suspension not exceeding one year, issuance of an order of change of its business or of prohibition of a part of its business, issuance of an order of dismissal of its Officers, or issuance of an order to take necessary measures specified in the articles of incorporation or any other rules; or
    一 法令、法令に基づく行政官庁の処分若しくは定款その他の規則に違反したとき、又は会員等若しくは当該金融商品取引所に上場されている有価証券の発行者が法令、法令に基づく行政官庁の処分若しくは当該金融商品取引所の定款、業務規程、受託契約準則その他の規則(以下この号において「法令等」という。)に違反し、若しくは定款その他の規則に定める取引の信義則に背反する行為をしたにもかかわらず、これらの者に対し法令等若しくは当該取引の信義則を遵守させるために、この法律、この法律に基づく命令若しくは定款その他の規則により認められた権能を行使せずその他必要な措置をとることを怠つたとき 第八十条第一項の免許を取り消し、一年以内の期間を定めてその業務の全部若しくは一部の停止を命じ、その業務の変更若しくはその業務の一部の禁止を命じ、その役員の解任を命じ、又は定款その他の規則に定める必要な措置をとることを命ずること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (10) The provisions of Article 97(3) and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847(2), Article 849(2) and (5) and Article 851) (Action for Pursing the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking payment under the provisions of Article 212(1) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5), and to an action for pursuing, under the provisions of Article 213(1) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5), the liability of directors, etc. defined in Article 213(1) of the Companies Act. In this case, the phrase "shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less than One Unit who is unable to exercise rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such a period or more)" in Article 847(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member, or a Preferred Equity Member who has held Preferred Equity continuously for the preceding six months or longer (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such a period or longer)," the term "shareholder" in paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    10 第九十七条第三項及び会社法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定は、第五項において準用する同法第二百十二条第一項の規定による支払を求める訴え及び第五項において準用する同法第二百十三条第一項の規定による同項に規定する取締役等の責任を追及する訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き株式を有する株主(第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。)」とあるのは「特定社員又は六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き優先出資を有する優先出資社員」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員又は優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • One of the points stressed when this act was extended for one year the previous time was that financial institutions should properly exercise their consulting function.This time, while the FSA and private financial institutions should naturally do their part, support for SMEs is generally a matter under the jurisdiction of the Small and Medium Enterprise Agency.Therefore, as was reported by newspapers, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry explicitly said that his ministry will submit a bill on business support for SMEs, so in cooperation with such activities, I will work to achieve the primary objective of the SME Financing Facilitation Act over the coming year.
    金融機関が持っているコンサルティング機能をしっかり発揮しなさいというのも、この前の1年間延長したときの中小企業金融円滑化法のポイントの一つでございましたが、今回は、金融のことは当然、金融庁あるいは民間金融機関にしっかり頑張っていただきますが、やはり全体的に中小企業の支援ということになりますと、これは中小企業庁の問題でもございますから、これは新聞で報道されているように、新たに経産省も中小企業の経営支援のところの法律を出すということを、はっきり経産大臣も言っておられましたので、そういったことと相まって、しっかりこの1年間、中小企業金融円滑化法の所期の目的を達するようにやっていきたいと思っております。 - 金融庁
  • (2) The provisions of Article 97(3) of this Act and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847(2), Article 849(2) and (5) and Article 851) (Action for Pursuing the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking liability filed against the director of a Specific Purpose Company under the provisions of Article 117 and to an action seeking liability filed against the director of a Specific Purpose Company under the provisions of the preceding Article and Article 464 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph. In this case, the phrase "A shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less than One Unit who is unable to exercise right pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189(2)) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more)" in Article 847(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A Specified Equity Member or a Preferred Equity Member who has held Preferred Equity continuously for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period or longer)," the term "shareholder" in Article 847(3) to (5) inclusive and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    2 第九十七条第三項及び会社法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定は、第百十七条の規定による同条に規定する特定目的会社の取締役の責任を追及する訴え並びに前条の規定及び前項において準用する同法第四百六十四条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任を追及する訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き株式を有する株主(第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。)」とあるのは「特定社員又は六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き優先出資を有する優先出資社員」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員又は優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (4) The provisions of Article 97(3) and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847(2), Article 849(2) and (5), and Article 851) (Action for Pursing the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action pursuing the liability of an incorporator, a Director at Incorporation, or a Company Auditor at Incorporation. In this case, the phrase "A shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less than One Unit who is unable to exercise rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation as set forth in Article 189(2)) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more)" in Article 847(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member (meaning a preferred equity member as defined in Article 26 of the Asset Securitization Act) who has held Preferred Equity continuously for the preceding six months or longer (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or longer)," the term "shareholder" in Article 847(3) to (5) inclusive and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    4 第九十七条第三項及び会社法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定は、発起人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役の責任を追及する訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き株式を有する株主(第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。)」とあるのは「特定社員又は六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き優先出資を有する優先出資社員(資産流動化法第二十六条に規定する優先出資社員をいう。)」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員又は優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • As for the response of the financial authorities, in the previous crisis, there was neither a safety net nor a scheme for dealing with failures. Nor was there a yardstick to measure financial soundness or a framework for preventing failures. In a situation like that, a trial and error process was inevitable. In contrast, we are dealing with the current crisis under a fairly-well-developed regulatory framework concerning financial soundness. In this situation, we have been able to provide early diagnosis and treatment, conduct stress tests and disclose information concerning the results of monitoring. Moreover, we placed emphasis on the exercise of the financial sector's financial intermediary function, as Japan's real economy deteriorated rapidly despite the relative soundness of the financial sector.
    金融当局の対応も、前回の危機のときは、セーフティネットや破綻処理スキームが未整備でございましたし、また健全性を図る尺度、健全性の基準であるとか、あるいは、破綻を予防する枠組みなども未整備でございました。そういう中での取組みでしたから、ある程度の試行錯誤が不可避であったと思います。それに引き換えまして、今回、私どもが対応した環境というのは、健全性規制の枠組みが、ある程度整っている状況の下での対応になりました。そういう中で、早期診断・早期対処、あるいはストレステストを行う、また、そのモニタリングの結果を情報発信するということができました。また、さらに日本の場合は、金融セクターは相対的に健全でしたけれども、実体経済が急速に悪化したという特徴もございましたので、金融セクターによる金融仲介機能の発揮という点に重点を置いた対応をしてきたということでございます。 - 金融庁
  • (i) the number adding one to the number obtained by multiplying 1/3 (in the case where the articles of incorporation define, as a requirement for concluding a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders, that a majority of more than a certain rate of the total voting rights held by Specified Shareholders [which means shareholders of Specified Shares (which means shares with the contents that a shareholder can exercise voting rights at a general meeting of shareholders pertaining to actions prescribed in Article 144-7, paragraph (2) of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article] who attend said general meeting of shareholders must agree to the resolution, the rate obtained by subtracting said certain rate from one) by the number obtained by multiplying 1/2 (in the case where the articles of incorporation define, as a requirement for concluding a resolution of said general meeting of shareholders, that shareholders who have more than a certain rate of the total voting rights must attend said general meeting of shareholders, said certain rate) by the total number of Specified Shares;
    一 特定株式(法第百四十四条の七第二項に規定する行為に係る株主総会において議決権を行使することができることを内容とする株式をいう。以下この条において同じ。)の総数に二分の一(当該株主総会の決議が成立するための要件として当該特定株式の議決権の総数の一定の割合以上の議決権を有する株主が出席しなければならない旨の定款の定めがある場合にあっては、当該一定の割合)を乗じて得た数に三分の一(当該株主総会の決議が成立するための要件として当該株主総会に出席した当該特定株主(特定株式の株主をいう。以下この条において同じ。)の有する議決権の総数の一定の割合以上の多数が賛成しなければならない旨の定款の定めがある場合にあっては、一から当該一定の割合を減じて得た割合)を乗じて得た数に一を加えた数 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (i) the number adding one to the number obtained by multiplying 1/3 (in the case where the articles of incorporation define, as a requirement for concluding a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders, that a majority of more than a certain rate of the total voting rights held by specified shareholders [which means shareholders of specified shares of stock (which means shares of stock with the contents that a shareholder can exercise voting rights at a general meeting of shareholders pertaining to actions prescribed in Article 144-7, paragraph 2 of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article] who attend said general meeting of shareholders must agree to the resolution, the rate obtained by subtracting said certain rate from one) by the number obtained by multiplying 1/2 (in the case where the articles of incorporation define, as a requirement for concluding a resolution of said general meeting of shareholders, that shareholders who have more than a certain rate of the total voting rights must attend said general meeting of shareholders, said certain rate) by the total number of specified shares of stock;
    一特定株式(法第百四十四条の七第二項に規定する行為に係る株主総会において議決 権を行使することができることを内容とする株式をいう。以下この条において同じ。) の総数に二分の一(当該株主総会の決議が成立するための要件として当該特定株式の 議決権の総数の一定の割合以上の議決権を有する株主が出席しなければならない旨の 定款の定めがある場合にあっては、当該一定の割合)を乗じて得た数に三分の一(当 該株主総会の決議が成立するための要件として当該株主総会に出席した当該特定株主 (特定株式の株主をいう。以下この条において同じ。)の有する議決権の総数の一定 の割合以上の多数が賛成しなければならない旨の定款の定めがある場合にあっては、 一から当該一定の割合を減じて得た割合)を乗じて得た数に一を加えた数 - 経済産業省
  • Article 239 (1) The provisions of Article 193 (Exercise of Rights by Co-owners), Article 196(2) (Presumption of Rights), Article 199 (Pledge of a Beneficial Interest for which Beneficiary Securities Have Been Issued), Article 200(1) (Perfection of Pledges of a Beneficial Interest in Trust for which Beneficiary Securities Have Been Issued), Article 201(1) (Statements in the Beneficial Interest Registry Concerning Pledges, etc.), Article 204 (Statements in Beneficial Interest Registry Pertaining to the Consolidation or Division of Beneficial Interest, etc.), and Article 208 (excluding paragraph (7)) (Offers Not to Hold Beneficiary Securities) of the Trust Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to beneficial interest in a Specific Purpose Trust. In this case, the phrase "beneficial interest in a Trust for which Beneficiary Securities Have Been Issued (excluding beneficial interest under the provisions set forth in Article 185(2))" in Article 199 and Article 200(1) of the Trust Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "beneficial interest in a Specific Purpose Trust," the phrase "beneficial interest in a Trust for which Beneficiary Securities Have Been Issued" in Article 201(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "beneficial interest in a Specific Purpose Trust," the phrase "beneficiaries of a Trust for which Beneficiary Securities Have Been Issued" in Article 208(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Beneficiary Certificate Holders," the phrase "details of the beneficial interest" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Share of Principal relating to the beneficial interest in the Specific Purpose Trust (in cases where multiple classes of beneficial interest are provided for, the classes of beneficial interest and the Share of Principal or Share of Interest relating to each class)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第二百三十九条 信託法第百九十三条(共有者による権利の行使)、第百九十六条第二項(権利の推定等)、第百九十九条(受益証券の発行された受益権の質入れ)、第二百条第一項(受益証券発行信託における受益権の質入れの対抗要件)、第二百一条第一項(質権に関する受益権原簿の記載等)、第二百四条(受益権の併合又は分割に係る受益権原簿の記載等)及び第二百八条(第七項を除く。)(受益証券不所持の申出)の規定は、特定目的信託の受益権について準用する。この場合において、同法第百九十九条及び第二百条第一項中「受益証券発行信託の受益権(第百八十五条第二項の定めのある受益権を除く。)」とあるのは「特定目的信託の受益権」と、同法第二百一条第一項中「受益証券発行信託の受益権」とあるのは「特定目的信託の受益権」と、同法第二百八条第一項中「受益証券発行信託の受益者」とあるのは「受益証券の権利者」と、同条第二項中「受益権の内容」とあるのは「特定目的信託の受益権の元本持分(種類の異なる受益権を定めた場合にあっては、受益権の種類及び種類ごとの元本持分又は利益持分)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Provided that,- where the Registrar has allowed an extension of the time within which an application may be accepted a further extension of four months after the said, twenty-four months shall be allowed for the sealing of the patent; where the sealing is delayed by an appeal to the Government, or by opposition to the grant of the patent, or by any proceedings taken for obtaining a direction of the Registrar under the provisions of sub-section (1A), or by reason of the Registrar, in exercise of the powers given to him by 8[ any other law for the time being in force], having omitted to do or delayed the doing of anything relating to the application the patent may be sealed at such time as the Registrar may direct; where the patent is granted to the legal representative of an applicant who has died before the expiration of the time which would otherwise be allowed for sealing the patent, the patent may be sealed at any time within twelve months after the date of his death or at such later time as the Registrar may think fit; where for any reason a patent cannot be sealed within the period allowed by any of the foregoing provisions of this section that period may on payment of the prescribed fee and on compliance with the prescribed conditions be extended to the extent applied for but not exceeding three months.
    ただし、次に掲げる各号を条件とする。登録官が、出願を受理できる期間の延長を認めた場合、特許への公印付与には、当該24 月の後にさらに4 月の延長期間が認められる。公印付与が、政府への不服申立て、又は当該特許付与に対する異義申立て、又は第(1A)項の規定に基づく登録官の指示を得るため取られた手続き、又は登録官が、その時点で施行されているその他の何らかの法令により当該登録官に付与された権限の行使にあたり、出願に関連する何らかの行為を懈怠若しくは遅延したために遅延した場合、当該特許は登録官が指示する時に公印を付与されることができる。当該特許が、当該特許への公印付与に認められた期間が経過するまでに死亡した出願人の法定代理人に付与される場合、当該特許は、出願人の死亡日後12 月以内の任意の日、又はそれ以降で登録官が適切と考える日に公印が付与される。何らかの理由で、本条前3 項の規定のいずれかにより認められた期間内に特許の公印を付与できない場合、その期間は、所定の手数料納付及び前記所定の条件の遵守を条件として3 月を超えない請求された限度で延長することができる。 - 特許庁
  • The name shall be removed from the Register of Professional Representatives of any person who: is deceased or subject to an incapacity under Article 69; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 63, no longer fulfills the conditions required by Article 60 and or may no longer rely on the provisions of an international convention or on reciprocity under paragraph 2 of that Article; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 64 is no longer resident in Belgium or in a Member State of the European Communities or has been prohibited or placed under guardianship; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 64 has been removed ex officio from the list of professional representatives before the European Patent Office for one of the reasons listed in Rule 102 to of the Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents or for having been subject to a disciplinary measure taken under Article 134 of that Convention; at the time of the request for entry or of a request for amendment of the entry, intentionally submitted documents or made declarations the content of which did not correspond to reality; has been convicted or has been subject to a prohibition referred to in Article 60; has committed a serious offense in the exercise of his patent representation activities before the Office.
    次に掲げる者は職業的代理人登録簿から抹消される。死亡した者,又は第69条の規定による無能力者となった者,第63条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが,もはや第60条及びの条件を満たしていない者,又は国際条約の規定若しくは第60条の下での相互主義に依存することができない者,第64条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが,もはやベルギー若しくは欧州共同体の居住者ではない者,又は禁止され若しくは保護の下におかれるようになった者,第64条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが,欧州特許の付与に関する条約についての施行規則の中の規則第102(a)から(c)までに掲げる理由の1つに基づき,又は同条約第134条(c)の下でとられた制裁措置に服させられたという理由で,職権により欧州特許庁に対する職業的代理人名簿から抹消された者,登録請求又は登録補正請求のとき,故意に真実ではない文書又は申立を提出した者,有罪の判決を受け,又は第60条にいう禁止に服させられた者,庁に対する特許代理人としての職務の遂行において,重大な罪を犯した者。 - 特許庁
  • Article 74 (1) When an Authorized Association has violated laws and regulations, a disposition given by government agencies based on laws and regulations, or its articles of incorporation or any other rules (hereinafter referred to as the "Laws and Regulations, etc." in this Article); or, despite the fact that a Member Firm, a Financial Instruments Intermediary Service Provider, or an issuer of Over-the-Counter Traded Securities or Tradable Securities has violated the Laws and Regulations, etc., or has committed an act contrary to the fair and equitable principles of transactions specified in the articles of incorporation or any other rules, the Authorized Association has failed to exercise its powers vested under this Act, an order given under this Act, or its articles of incorporation or any other rules, or to take any other necessary measures, for having such persons observe the Laws and Regulations, etc. or the fair and equitable principles of transactions, if the Prime Minister finds it necessary and appropriate for the public interest and protection of investors, he/she may rescind the authorization of its establishment, issue an order of suspension of all or part of its business, specifying a period of suspension not exceeding one year, issue an order of change of its business methods or of prohibition of a part of its business, issue an order of dismissal of its Officers, or issue an order to take necessary measures specified in the articles of incorporation or any other rules.
    第七十四条 内閣総理大臣は、認可協会が法令、法令に基づく行政官庁の処分若しくは当該認可協会の定款その他の規則(以下この条において「法令等」という。)に違反した場合又は協会員、金融商品仲介業者若しくは店頭売買有価証券若しくは取扱有価証券の発行者が法令等に違反し、若しくは定款その他の規則に定める取引の信義則に背反する行為をしたにもかかわらず、これらの者に対し法令等若しくは当該取引の信義則を遵守させるために認可協会がこの法律、この法律に基づく命令若しくは定款その他の規則により認められた権能を行使せずその他必要な措置をすることを怠つた場合において、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当であると認めるときは、その設立の認可を取り消し、一年以内の期間を定めてその業務の全部若しくは一部の停止を命じ、その業務の方法の変更若しくはその業務の一部の禁止を命じ、その役員の解任を命じ、又は定款その他の規則に定める必要な措置をすることを命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires - “authorised officer” means - (a) a proper officer of customs as defined under the Customs Act 1967; or (b) any officer appointed by the Minister by notification in the Gazette to exercise the powers and perform the duties conferred and imposed on an authorised officer by this Part; “counterfeit trade mark goods” means any goods, including packaging, bearing without authorisation a trade mark which is identical with or so nearly resembles the trade mark validly registered in respect of such goods, or which cannot be distinguished in its essential aspects from such a trade mark, and which infringes the rights of the proprietor of the trade mark under this Act; “goods in transit” means goods imported, whether or not landed or transshipped within Malaysia, which are to be carried to another country either by the same or another conveyance; “import” means to bring or cause to be brought into Malaysia by whatever means; “retention period”, in relation to seized goods, means - (a) the period specified in a notice given under section 70G in respect of the goods; or (b) if the period has been extended under section 70G, that period so extended; “security” means any sum of money in cash; “seized goods” means goods seized under section 70D.
    この部においては,文脈上別段の解釈を必要としない限り, 「権限ある公務員」とは, (a) 1967年関税法において定義されている本来の税関職員,又は (b) この部において権限ある公務員に与えられる権限を行使し,かつ,課される義務を履行すべき者として官報における告示により大臣に任命される公務員をいう。 「偽造商標商品」とは,ある商品について適法に登録されている商標と同一の若しくは類似する,又は当該商標と本質的部分において区別し得ない商標であって,本法に基づく当該商標の所有者の権利を侵害するものが,許可なく付されている商品(包装を含む。)をいう。 「通過商品」とは,マレーシアにおいて陸揚げされるか否か又は積み替えられるか否かを問わず,同一の輸送手段によるか又は別の輸送手段によって他国に運ばれる予定で一時的にマレーシアに搬入される商品をいう。 「輸入」とは,輸送手段如何を問わずマレーシアに運び込む又は運び込ませることをいう。 「留置期間」とは,押収された商品に関して, (a) 第70G条に基づき与えられる通知において指定される期間,又は (b) 第70G条に基づきその期間が延長された場合は,その延長された期間をいう。 「担保」とは,何らかの金額の現金をいう。 「押収商品」とは,第70D条に基づき押収された商品をいう。 - 特許庁
  • Article 61-5 The provisions of Article 680 to 683 inclusive (Bondholders of Bonds for Subscription, Bond Registry, Delivery of Document Stating Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry, Management of Bond Registry), Article 684 (excluding paragraphs (4) and (5)) (Keeping and Making Available for Inspection of Bond Registry) and Article 685 to 701 inclusive (Notices to Bondholders, Exercise of Rights by Co-owners, Assignment of Bonds with Issued Certificates, Perfection of Assignment of Bonds, Presumption of Rights, Stating or Recording Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry Without Request from Bondholders, Stating or Recording Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry as Requested by Bondholders, Pledges of Bonds with Issued Certificates, Perfection of Pledge of Bonds, Entries in Bond Registry Regarding Pledges, Delivery of Documents Stating Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry Regarding Pledges, Perfection Requirements for Bonds Belonging to Trust Property, etc., Issuing of Bond Certificates, Matters to Be Stated on Bond Certificates, Conversions between Registered Bonds and Bearer Bonds, Loss of Bond Certificates, Redemption of Bonds where Coupons Missing, Extinctive Prescription of Right to Claim Redemption of Bonds) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company issues bonds. In this case, the term "bond-issuing Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "bond-issuing mutual company"; the term "the preceding Article" in Article 680, item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 61-4 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 676, items (iii) though (viii)" in Article 681, item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 61, items (iii) to (viii) inclusive of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 720, paragraph (1)" in Article 685, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 720, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 61-8, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 676, item (vii)" in Article 698 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 61, item (vii) of the Insurance Business Act"; any technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第六十一条の五 会社法第六百八十条から第六百八十三条まで(募集社債の社債権者、社債原簿、社債原簿記載事項を記載した書面の交付等、社債原簿管理人)、第六百八十四条(第四項及び第五項を除く。)(社債原簿の備置き及び閲覧等)及び第六百八十五条から第七百一条まで(社債権者に対する通知等、共有者による権利の行使、社債券を発行する場合の社債の譲渡、社債の譲渡の対抗要件、権利の推定等、社債権者の請求によらない社債原簿記載事項の記載又は記録、社債権者の請求による社債原簿記載事項の記載又は記録、社債券を発行する場合の社債の質入れ、社債の質入れの対抗要件、質権に関する社債原簿の記載等、質権に関する社債原簿の記載事項を記載した書面の交付等、信託財産に属する社債についての対抗要件等、社債券の発行、社債券の記載事項、記名式と無記名式との間の転換、社債券の喪失、利札が欠けている場合における社債の償還、社債の償還請求権等の消滅時効)の規定は、相互会社が社債を発行する場合について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「社債を発行した相互会社」と、同法第六百八十条第二号中「前条」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の四」と、同法第六百八十一条第一号中「第六百七十六条第三号から第八号まで」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条第三号から第八号まで」と、同法第六百八十五条第五項中「第七百二十条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の八第二項において準用する第七百二十条第一項」と、同法第六百九十八条中「第六百七十六条第七号」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条第七号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) With regard to the application of the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 10, paragraph (1) of Article 12, Article 12-2, paragraph (1) of Article 13 and paragraph (1) of Article 18 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act concerning a dispatching undertaking in which workers employed in said undertaking are dispatched for dispatch work in a client undertaking, the term "the following matters" in paragraph (1) of Article 10 of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the following matters (with regard to workers under dispatching prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 44 of the Act for Securing Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act") (hereinafter such workers shall be referred to simply as "workers under dispatching"), excluding matters in which a person carrying out a client undertaking prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 44 of the Worker Dispatching Act has the general safety and health manager he/she has appointed exercise overall control under the provisions of this paragraph as applied by replacing the terms under the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 45 of the Worker Dispatching Act; such matters shall be referred to as "safety and health management at the client's place of business" in paragraph (1) of Article 12 and in Article 12-2)"; the term "the matters listed in each item of paragraph (1) of Article 10" in paragraph (1) of Article 12 and in Article 12-2 shall be deemed to be replaced with " safety and health management at the client's place of business"; the term "health care for workers and (carry out) other matters provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (hereinafter" in paragraph (1) of Article 13 shall be deemed to be replaced with "health care for workers and (carry out) other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (with regard to workers under dispatching, limited to matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare among the matters concerned; in paragraph (3) and in the following Article"; and the term "the following matters" in paragraph (1) of Article 18 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the following matters (with regard to workers under dispatching, limited to those matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare among the matters concerned)".
    2 その事業に使用する労働者が派遣先の事業における派遣就業のために派遣されている派遣元の事業に関する労働安全衛生法第十条第一項、第十二条第一項、第十二条の二、第十三条第一項及び第十八条第一項の規定の適用については、同法第十条第一項中「次の業務」とあるのは「次の業務(労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律(以下「労働者派遣法」という。)第四十四条第一項に規定する派遣中の労働者(以下単に「派遣中の労働者」という。)に関しては、労働者派遣法第四十五条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用されるこの項の規定により労働者派遣法第四十四条第一項に規定する派遣先の事業を行う者がその選任する総括安全衛生管理者に統括管理させる業務を除く。第十二条第一項及び第十二条の二において「派遣元安全衛生管理業務」という。)」と、同法第十二条第一項及び第十二条の二中「第十条第一項各号の業務」とあるのは「派遣元安全衛生管理業務」と、同法第十三条第一項中「健康管理その他の厚生労働省令で定める事項(以下」とあるのは「健康管理その他の厚生労働省令で定める事項(派遣中の労働者に関しては、当該事項のうち厚生労働省令で定めるものに限る。第三項及び次条において」と、同法第十八条第一項中「次の事項」とあるのは「次の事項(派遣中の労働者に関しては、当該事項のうち厚生労働省令で定めるものに限る。)」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 522 (1) If the court finds it necessary after the commencement of special liquidation considering the status of the assets of a Liquidating Stock Company, it may effect the disposition ordering that the matters listed below be investigated by investigators (hereinafter in Article 533 referred to as "Investigation Order") in response to a petition by liquidators, Company Auditors, creditors who have claims equivalent to one tenth or more of the total amount of the claims of creditors that have stated their claims and other creditors known to the Liquidating Stock Company, or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or ex officio:
    第五百二十二条 裁判所は、特別清算開始後において、清算株式会社の財産の状況を考慮して必要があると認めるときは、清算人、監査役、債権の申出をした債権者その他清算株式会社に知れている債権者の債権の総額の十分の一以上に当たる債権を有する債権者若しくは総株主(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式(自己株式を除く。)の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の数の株式を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主の申立てにより又は職権で、次に掲げる事項について、調査委員による調査を命ずる処分(第五百三十三条において「調査命令」という。)をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Members, Recognizing the growing importance of trade in services for the growth and development of the world economy; Wishing to establish a multilateral framework of principles and rules for trade in services with a view to the expansion of such trade under conditions of transparency and progressive liberalization and as a means of promoting the economic growth of all trading partners and the development of developing countries; Desiring the early achievement of progressively higher levels of liberalization of trade in services through successive rounds of multilateral negotiations aimed at promoting the interests of all participants on a mutually advantageous basis and at securing an overall balance of rights and obligations, while giving due respect to national policy objectives; Recognizing the right of Members to regulate, and to introduce new regulations, on the supply of services within their territories in order to meet national policy objectives and, given asymmetries existing with respect to the degree of development of services regulations in different countries, the particular need of developing countries to exercise this right; Desiring to facilitate the increasing participation of developing countries in trade in services and the expansion of their service exports including, inter alia, through the strengthening of their domestic services capacity and its efficiency and competitiveness; Taking particular account of the serious difficulty of the least-developed countries in view of their special economic situation and their development, trade and financial needs; Hereby agree as follows:
    加盟国は、世界経済の成長及び発展にとってサービスの貿易の重要性が増大していることを認め、透明性及び漸進的な自由化を確保しつつサービスの貿易を拡大することを目的として、また、すべての参加国の経済成長及び開発途上国の発展を促進する手段として、サービスの貿易に関する原則及び規則の多角的枠組みを設定することを希望し、すべての参加国の利益を互恵的な基礎の上に増進し、かつ、権利及び義務の全体的な均衡を確保することを目的として引き続き行われる多角的交渉のラウンドを通じ、国家の政策目的に十分な考慮を払いつつ、漸進的かつ早期に一層高い水準のサービスの貿易の自由化を達成することを希望し、国家の政策目的を実現するため自国の領域内におけるサービスの提供に関して規制を行い又は新たな規制を導入する権利を有すること及びサービスの規制に係る発展の程度に関して国の間に存在する不均衡にかんがみ開発途上国にはこの権利を行使する必要が特にあることを認め、特に開発途上国の国内のサービスに関する能力並びにその効率性及び競争力を強化することにより、開発途上国のサービスの貿易への参加の増大及びサービスの輸出の拡大を促進することを希望し、後発開発途上国の特別な経済的事情並びにこれらの国の開発上、貿易上及び資金上のニーズにかんがみ、後発開発途上国が重大な困難を有することに特に留意して、ここに、次のとおり協定する。 - 経済産業省
  • Article 1-2 The total amount of assets calculated using the method provided by the rule of the Fair Trade Commission set out in paragraph 5, Article 9 of the Act shall be the total amount of assets in the final balance sheet of the company (or the balance sheet as of the incorporation of the company if the first business year after the incorporation thereof has not ended) or, in the event of an issue of shares for subscription, etc. pursuant to the provision of Article 199 of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005), an acquisition of shares resulting from an exercise of share options prescribed in item 21, paragraph 1, Article 2 of the Companies Act, an issue of company bonds, a share exchange, a merger, a split, an acquisition of business, a transfer of business or any other significant change to the assets of the company after the end of business year (or at the time of incorporation, if the first business year after the incorporation of the company has not ended) involved in the balance sheet, the amount calculated by adding or subtracting the change in the total asset amount resulting from the event.
    第一条の二 法第九条第五項に規定する公正取引委員会規則で定める方法による資産の合計金額は、会社の最終の貸借対照表(当該会社がその設立後最初の事業年度を終了していない場合においては、当該会社の成立時の貸借対照表)による資産の合計金額とし、当該貸借対照表に係る事業年度終了の日(当該会社がその設立後最初の事業年度を終了していない場合においては、当該会社の成立時)後において会社法(平成十七年法律第八十六号)第百九十九条の規定による募集株式の発行等、同法第二条第一項第二十一号に規定する新株予約権の行使による株式の交付、社債の発行、株式交換、合併、分割、事業譲受、事業譲渡その他当該会社の資産に重要な変更があつた場合には、これらによる総資産の額の変動を加え又は除いた額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 11 (1) Where a settlor has created a trust with the knowledge that it would harm the settlor's creditor, the creditor may, irrespective of whether or not the trustee had knowledge of the fact that the creditor would be harmed, request the court for a rescission under the provisions of Article 424, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code (Act No. 89 of 1896), with the trustee as the defendant; provided, however, that this shall not apply where there are any beneficiaries at the time, all or some of who had no knowledge of the fact that the creditor would be harmed at the time when they became aware that they had been designated as beneficiaries (meaning being designated as an initial beneficiary or new beneficiary after a change in the provisions of the terms of trust or as a result of the exercise of the right to designate or change a beneficiary prescribed in Article 89, paragraph (1); the same shall apply hereinafter) or when they acquired beneficial interests.
    第十一条 委託者がその債権者を害することを知って信託をした場合には、受託者が債権者を害すべき事実を知っていたか否かにかかわらず、債権者は、受託者を被告として、民法(明治二十九年法律第八十九号)第四百二十四条第一項の規定による取消しを裁判所に請求することができる。ただし、受益者が現に存する場合において、その受益者の全部又は一部が、受益者としての指定(信託行為の定めにより又は第八十九条第一項に規定する受益者指定権等の行使により受益者又は変更後の受益者として指定されることをいう。以下同じ。)を受けたことを知った時又は受益権を譲り受けた時において債権者を害すべき事実を知らなかったときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 125 The provisions of Article 680 to Article 701 (excluding Article 684(4) and (5)) (Bondholders of Bonds for Subscription; Bond Registry; Delivery of Documents Stating Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry; Manager of Bond Registry; Keeping and Making Available for Inspection of Bond Registry; Notices to Bondholders; Exercise of Rights by Co-owners; Perfection of Assignment of Bonds; Presumption of Rights; Stating or Recording Matters to be Stated in Bond Registry without Request from Bondholders; Stating or Recording Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry as Requested by Bondholders; Pledges of Bonds with Issued Certificates; Perfection of Pledge of Bonds; Entries in Bond Registry Regarding Pledges; Delivery of Documents Stating Matters to Be Stated in Bond Registry Regarding Pledges; Issuing of Bond Certificates; Matters to Be Stated on Bond Certificates, Conversions Between Registered Bonds and Bearer Bonds; Loss of Bond Certificates; Redemption of Bonds Where Coupons Missing; Extinctive Prescription of Right to Claim Redemption of Bonds) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Bonds, Specified Bondholders, Specified Bond Certificates, or the Specified Bond Registry in cases where a Specific Purpose Company issues Specified Bonds. In this case, the phrases "Matters to Be Specified in Bond Registry," "Bond-issuing Company," and "bearer bonds" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Matters to Be Stated in the Specified Bond Registry," "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," and "Specified Bonds in bearer form," respectively, the phrase "Bonds for subscription" in Article 680 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Bonds for Subscription," the phrase "the preceding Article" in Article 680(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 124 of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "items (iii) through (viii) of Article 676" in Article 681(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 122(1)(vi) to (xi) inclusive of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "a manager of Bond Registry" in Article 683 and Article 684(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "an Administrator of the Specified Bond Registry," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 720" in Article 685(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 720(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 129(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "item (vii) of Article 676" in Article 698 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 122(1)(x)" of the Asset Securitization Act, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第百二十五条 会社法第六百八十条から第七百一条まで(第六百八十四条第四項及び第五項を除く。)(募集社債の社債権者、社債原簿、社債原簿記載事項を記載した書面の交付等、社債原簿管理人、社債原簿の備置き及び閲覧等、社債権者に対する通知等、共有者による権利の行使、社債券を発行する場合の社債の譲渡、社債の譲渡の対抗要件、権利の推定等、社債権者の請求によらない社債原簿記載事項の記載又は記録、社債権者の請求による社債原簿記載事項の記載又は記録、社債券を発行する場合の社債の質入れ、社債の質入れの対抗要件、質権に関する社債原簿の記載等、質権に関する社債原簿の記載事項を記載した書面の交付等、信託財産に属する社債についての対抗要件等、社債券の発行、社債券の記載事項、記名式と無記名式との間の転換、社債券の喪失、利札が欠けている場合における社債の償還、社債の償還請求権等の消滅時効)の規定は、特定目的会社が特定社債を発行する場合における特定社債、特定社債権者、特定社債券又は特定社債原簿について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債原簿記載事項」、「社債発行会社」及び「無記名社債」とあるのは、それぞれ「特定社債原簿記載事項」、「特定社債発行会社」及び「無記名特定社債」と、同法第六百八十条中「募集社債」とあるのは「募集特定社債」と、同条第二号中「前条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十四条」と、同法第六百八十一条第一号中「第六百七十六条第三号から第八号まで」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十二条第一項第六号から第十一号まで」と、同法第六百八十三条及び第六百八十四条第一項中「社債原簿管理人」とあるのは「特定社債原簿管理人」と、同法第六百八十五条第五項中「第七百二十条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十九条第二項において準用する第七百二十条第一項」と、同法第六百九十八条中「第六百七十六条第七号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十二条第一項第十号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (iv)-2 where, after resolution of a shareholder meeting or board of directors of the Listed Company, etc. (including a decision of an executive officer in the case of a company with Committees) (limited to resolution on the matters listed in any of the items of Article 156(1) of Companies Act) made under Article 156(1) of said Act (including the cases where it is applied by replacing certain terms under the provisions of Articles 163 and 165(3) of said Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) or resolution or other similar decision of the Listed Company, etc. made under laws and regulations of a foreign state equivalent to these provisions with regard to acquisition of own shares provided in Article 156(1) of said Act or laws and regulations of a foreign state equivalent to these provisions (these resolutions or decisions are hereinafter referred to as "Resolution of Shareholder Meeting, etc." in this item) is Publicized as provided by paragraph (1) (including a decision of the organ of the Listed Company, etc. which is responsible for making decisions on the execution of the operations of the Listed Company, etc., when the Resolution of Shareholder Meeting, etc. has the same content as the organ's decision and it has been Publicized as provided by paragraph (1) before the Resolution of Shareholder Meeting, etc. is made), purchase of share certificates of said own shares, Securities indicating the rights pertaining to such share certificates specified in Article 2(1)(xx) or other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to as "Share Certificates, etc." in this item) or an option pertaining to sales and purchases of the Share Certificates, etc. (limited to an option of which exercise will place the person exercising it in the position of the buyer in the transaction to be conducted based on it; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) is made under the Resolution of Shareholder Meeting, etc. (excluding the cases where no Material Fact Pertaining to Business or Other Matters provided in paragraph (1) other than the decision on acquisition of said own shares made by the organ of the Listed Company, etc. which is responsible for making decisions on the execution of the operations of the Listed Company, etc. has been Publicized as provided in said paragraph (excluding the cases where purchase of Share Certificates, etc. of said own shares or an option pertaining to such Share Certificates, etc. is made pursuant to this item with regard to acquisition of own shares under Article 156(1) of said Act or laws and regulations of a foreign state equivalent thereto other than acquisition of said own shares));
    四の二 会社法第百五十六条第一項(同法第百六十三条及び第百六十五条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合を含む。以下この号において同じ。)の規定又はこれらに相当する外国の法令の規定による自己の株式の取得についての当該上場会社等の同法第百五十六条第一項の規定による株主総会若しくは取締役会の決議(委員会設置会社にあつては、執行役の決定を含む。)(同項各号に掲げる事項に係るものに限る。)又はこれらに相当する外国の法令の規定に基づいて行う決議等(以下この号において「株主総会決議等」という。)について第一項に規定する公表(当該株主総会決議等の内容が当該上場会社等の業務執行を決定する機関の決定と同一の内容であり、かつ、当該株主総会決議等の前に当該決定について同項に規定する公表がされている場合の当該公表を含む。)がされた後、当該株主総会決議等に基づいて当該自己の株式に係る株券若しくは株券に係る権利を表示する第二条第一項第二十号に掲げる有価証券その他の政令で定める有価証券(以下この号において「株券等」という。)又は株券等の売買に係るオプション(当該オプションの行使により当該行使をした者が当該オプションに係る株券等の売買において買主としての地位を取得するものに限る。以下この号において同じ。)の買付けをする場合(当該自己の株式の取得についての当該上場会社等の業務執行を決定する機関の決定以外の第一項に規定する業務等に関する重要事実について、同項に規定する公表がされていない場合(当該自己の株式の取得以外の同法第百五十六条第一項の規定又はこれらに相当する外国の法令の規定による自己の株式の取得について、この号の規定に基づいて当該自己の株式に係る株券等又は株券等の売買に係るオプションの買付けをする場合を除く。)を除く。) - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (6) The provisions of Article 44-2 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (3)) and Article 73 to the preceding Article inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of Policyholders. In this case, the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 310, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the first sentence of Article 44-2, paragraph (3) and the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 310, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 44-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 299, paragraph (3)" in Article 310, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 68, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 74, paragraph (3) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Policyholders or members"; the term "Article 74 to 76 inclusive" in Article 74, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Articles 75 and 76"; the term "Policyholder" in Article 74, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 74, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representatives, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, general representatives, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    6 第四十四条の二(第三項後段を除く。)及び第七十三条から前条までの規定は、保険契約者総代会について準用する。この場合において、第四十四条の二第三項前段において準用する会社法第三百十条第二項中「前項」とあり、及び同条第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十四条の二第一項」と、同条第四項中「第二百九十九条第三項」とあるのは「保険業法第七十四条第三項において準用する第六十八条第三項」と、同条第七項中「株主(前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。)」とあるのは「保険契約者又は社員」と、第七十四条第三項中「第七十四条から第七十六条まで」とあるのは「第七十五条及び第七十六条」と、同項及び同条第四項中「保険契約者」とあるのは「総代」と、同条第三項において準用する同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「総代、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、総代、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) When a Fisheries Cooperative Association or a Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations is going to establish the Fishery Right Exercise Rule for the provided specific demarcated fishery right or the common fishery right covering the class 1 common fishery held by the association or the federation, the association or the federation shall obtain the consents in writing of not less than two thirds of the partner of the association or the federation (the partner of the Fisheries Cooperative Associations which are the partner of the Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations, in the case of the federation; the same shall apply hereinafter), who operate the fishery covered by said fishery right when the association or the federation is granted the license of the fishery pertaining to said fishery right (or who operate a shore fishery (which refers to the fishery excluding the fishery operated using a powered fishing boat with a total tonnage of 20 tons or more and the fishery in inland waters; the same shall apply hereinafter) in the case where the region of the fishing ground pertaining to said fishery right is waters other than inland waters (excluding the lakes and marshes designated by the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1), Article 84; the same shall apply hereinafter except paragraph (1), Article 21) with respect to the provided demarcated fishery right and the common fishery right covering the class 1 common fishery established for the persons qualified pursuant to the provision of paragraph (6), Article 14; or who operate a fishery in the inland waters other than rivers in the case where said region is said inland waters; or who gather, catch or culture aquatic animals and plants in a river in the case where said region is said river), and who have addresses in the region of the local district provided in Article 11 pertaining to said fishery right (the district concerned provided in the same Article for the common fishery right), before any resolution is made in the general meeting provided in the Fisheries Industry Cooperative Association Act (Act No. 242 of 1948) (including a sectional meeting and a representatives' meeting of the general meeting).
    3 漁業協同組合又は漁業協同組合連合会は、その有する特定区画漁業権又は第一種共同漁業を内容とする共同漁業権について漁業権行使規則を定めようとするときは、水産業協同組合法(昭和二十三年法律第二百四十二号)の規定による総会(総会の部会及び総代会を含む。)の議決前に、その組合員(漁業協同組合連合会の場合には、その会員たる漁業協同組合の組合員。以下同じ。)のうち、当該漁業権に係る漁業の免許の際において当該漁業権の内容たる漁業を営む者(第十四条第六項の規定により適格性を有するものとして設定を受けた特定区画漁業権及び第一種共同漁業を内容とする共同漁業権については、当該漁業権に係る漁場の区域が内水面(第八十四条第一項の規定により農林水産大臣が指定する湖沼を除く。第二十一条第一項を除き、以下同じ。)以外の水面である場合にあつては沿岸漁業(総トン数二十トン以上の動力漁船を使用して行う漁業及び内水面における漁業を除いた漁業をいう。以下同じ。)を営む者、河川以外の内水面である場合にあつては当該内水面において漁業を営む者、河川である場合にあつては当該河川において水産動植物の採捕又は養殖をする者)であつて、当該漁業権に係る第十一条に規定する地元地区(共同漁業権については、同条に規定する関係地区)の区域内に住所を有するものの三分の二以上の書面による同意を得なければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Unless otherwise indicated, the following terms shall be understood as follows: (a) “Bureau” means the Bureau of Legal Affairs of the Intellectual Property Office; (b) “Chief Hearing Officer” means the officer within the Bureau who exercises immediate supervision over any Hearing Officer. His title or official designation may differ from the words “Chief Hearing Officer” depending on the structure of the Office; (c) “Court” means a court of general jurisdiction such as Regional Trial Court; (d) “Director” means the Director of the Bureau of Legal Affairs; (e) “Director General” means the head of the Intellectual Property Office; (f) “Hearing Officer” means the Officer within the Bureau authorized to exercise the functions of “Hearing Officer” in these Regulations. The title or official designation of such officers may differ from the words “Hearing Officers” depending on the structure of the Office; (g) “IP Code” means Republic Act No. 8293 otherwise known as the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines; (h) “Office” means the Intellectual Property Office; (i) “Regulations” means this set of rules and regulations and such Regulations as may be formulated by the Director of the Bureau of Legal Affairs and approved by the Director General.
    別段の定めがない限り,次の用語は,次のように解釈する。 (a)「局」とは,知的所有権庁の法務局をいう。 (b)「主任聴聞官」とは,局の上級職員であって,聴聞官を直接監督するものをいう。その役職又は正式な呼称は,庁の構成によっては,「主任聴聞官」の語と異なる場合がある。 (c)「裁判所」とは,地方裁判所等の一般管轄権を有する裁判所をいう。 (d)「局長」とは,法務局長をいう。 (e)「長官」とは,知的所有権庁の長をいう。 (f)「聴聞官」とは,局の上級職員であって,本規則において,「聴聞官」の職権を行使する権限を有するものをいう。当該職員の役職又は正式の呼称は,庁の構成によっては「聴聞官」の語と異なる場合がある。 (g)「IP法」とは,フィリピン知的財産法とも称する共和国法律第8293号をいう。 (h)「庁」とは,知的所有権庁をいう。 (i)「規則」とは,この一連の規則及び法務局長が作成し長官が承認する規則をいう。 - 特許庁
  • Article 347 (1) For the purpose of the application of the provisions of Article 329(1), Article 332(1), Article 339(1) and Article 341 to the cases where it issues shares in a class for which there is the provision with respect to the matters listed in item (ix) of Article 108(1) (limited to those relating to directors), "shareholders meeting" in Article 329(1) shall be read as "shareholders meeting (or, for directors, Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of each class of shares in accordance with the applicable provisions of the articles of incorporation on the matters prescribed in item (ix) Article 108(2))"; "by resolution of a shareholders meeting" in Article 332(1) and Article 339(1) shall be read as "by resolution of a shareholders meeting (or, for directors elected pursuant to the provisions of Article 41(1), or at a Class Meeting under Article 90(1) or a Class Meeting under Article 329(1) applied by reading of terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 347(1), Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of shares of the class relating to the election of such director (or shareholders meeting in cases where it is otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, or in cases where, before the expiration of the term of office of such director, there are no longer any shareholders entitled to exercise his/her votes at such Class Meeting))"; "Article 309(1)" in Article 341 shall be read as "Article 309(1) and Article 324"; and "shareholders meeting" in Article 341 shall be read as "shareholders meeting (including the Class Meeting under Article 329(1) and Article 339(1) applied by the reading of terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 347(1))."
    第三百四十七条 第百八条第一項第九号に掲げる事項(取締役に関するものに限る。)についての定めがある種類の株式を発行している場合における第三百二十九条第一項、第三百三十二条第一項、第三百三十九条第一項及び第三百四十一条の規定の適用については、第三百二十九条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「株主総会(取締役については、第百八条第二項第九号に定める事項についての定款の定めに従い、各種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会)」と、第三百三十二条第一項及び第三百三十九条第一項中「株主総会の決議」とあるのは「株主総会(第四十一条第一項の規定により又は第九十条第一項の種類創立総会若しくは第三百四十七条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用する第三百二十九条第一項の種類株主総会において選任された取締役については、当該取締役の選任に係る種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会(定款に別段の定めがある場合又は当該取締役の任期満了前に当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存在しなくなった場合にあっては、株主総会))の決議」と、第三百四十一条中「第三百九条第一項」とあるのは「第三百九条第一項及び第三百二十四条」と、「株主総会」とあるのは「株主総会(第三百四十七条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用する第三百二十九条第一項及び第三百三十九条第一項の種類株主総会を含む。)」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 53-37 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (5), Article 851, paragraph (1), item (i) and Article 851, paragraph (2)) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for accountability in a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Section 3 of said Chapter (excluding Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i), (a) and Article 854, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive) (Lawsuit for Dismissal of Officer in Stock Company) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (j)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for dismissal of an officer in a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "shareholders having the shares (excluding the holders of shares less than one unit who may not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189, paragraph (2)" and "Article 423, paragraph (1)" in Article 847, paragraph (1) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc.) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "Article 53-33, paragraph (1) of Insurance Business Act," respectively; the term "shareholder" in Article 847, paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member"; and the provision of Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those members or nine (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.
    第五十三条の三十七 会社法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第五項並びに第八百五十一条第一項第一号及び第二項を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定は相互会社における責任を追及する訴えについて、同章第三節(第八百五十四条第一項第一号イ及び第二号並びに第二項から第四項までを除く。)(株式会社の役員の解任の訴え)及び同法第九百三十七条第一項(第一号ヌに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の役員の解任の訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項(責任追及等の訴え)中「株式を有する株主(第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。)」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「第四百二十三条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十三第一項」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百五十四条第一項第一号(株式会社の役員の解任の訴え)中「総株主(次に掲げる株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の社員(特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員)で」と、「有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者(総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の総代)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (vi) A person who holds voting rights of a Bank (including a person falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding items; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), where the total number of voting rights of that Bank held by that person (in the case of a person falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding items, the number specified in each item) and those held by his/her Joint Holder(s) (meaning another person (including a person falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding items) who holds voting rights of the Bank and has agreed with that person on joint acquisition or transfer of shares relating to the Bank's voting rights or on joint exercise of the voting rights or other right as shareholders of that Bank (excluding a Company, etc. which is consolidated in the financial statements or other documents of that company where that holder of those voting rights is a company falling under the category listed in item (ii), a Company, etc. other than that company belonging to the Group of Companies, etc. to which that person belongs where that holder of voting rights is a Company, etc. falling under the category prescribed in item (iii) or (iv), a Company, etc. whose majority voting rights are held by that person where a holder of those voting rights is an individual falling under the category listed in the preceding item, but including a person who has a special relationship with said person specified by a Cabinet Order with the holder of those voting rights)) (in the case of a Joint Holder falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding items, the number prescribed in each item) (the total number of voting rights is hereinafter referred to as "The Number of Voting Rights Jointly Held" in this item) is equal to or more than twenty hundredths of the Voting Rights Held by All of the Shareholders, etc. of the Bank: The Number of Voting Rights Jointly Held
    六 銀行の議決権の保有者(前各号に掲げる者を含む。以下この号において同じ。)のうち、その保有する当該銀行の議決権の数(当該議決権の保有者が前各号に掲げる者であるときは、それぞれ当該各号に定める数)とその共同保有者(銀行の議決権の保有者が、当該銀行の議決権の他の保有者(前各号に掲げる者を含む。)と共同して当該議決権に係る株式を取得し、若しくは譲渡し、又は当該銀行の株主としての議決権その他の権利を行使することを合意している場合における当該他の保有者(当該議決権の保有者が第二号に掲げる会社である場合においては当該会社の計算書類その他の書類に連結される会社等を、当該議決権の保有者が第三号又は第四号に掲げる会社等である場合においては当該会社等が属する会社等集団に属する当該会社等以外の会社等を、当該議決権の保有者が前号に掲げる個人である場合においては当該個人がその議決権の過半数の保有者である会社等を除き、当該議決権の保有者と政令で定める特別な関係を有する者を含む。)をいう。)の保有する当該銀行の議決権の数(当該共同保有者が前各号に掲げる者であるときは、それぞれ当該各号に定める数)を合算した数(以下この号において「共同保有議決権数」という。)が当該銀行の総株主の議決権の百分の二十以上の数である者 共同保有議決権数 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) For the purpose of the application of the provisions of Article 329(1), Article 339(1) and Article 341 to the cases where it issues shares in a class for which there is the provision with respect to the matters listed in item (ix) of Article 108(1) (limited to those relating to company auditors), "shareholders meeting" in Article 329(1) shall be read as "shareholders meeting (or, for company auditors, Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of each class of shares in accordance with the applicable provisions of the articles of incorporation on the matters prescribed in item (ix) Article 108(2))"; "the shareholders meeting" in Article 339(1) shall be read as "shareholders meeting (or, for company auditors elected pursuant to the provisions of Article 41(1) applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (3) of that article, or at a Class Meeting under Article 90(1) applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (2) of that article or at a Class Meeting under 329(1) applied by the reading of terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 347(2), Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of shares of the class relating to the election of such company auditor (or shareholders meeting in cases where it is otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, or in cases where, before the expiration of the term of office of such company auditor, there are no longer any shareholders entitled to exercise his/her votes at such Class Meeting))"; "Article 309(1)" in Article 341 shall be read as "Article 309(1) and Article 324"; and "shareholders meeting" in Article 341 shall be read as "shareholders meeting (including the Class Meeting under Article 329(1) applied by the reading of terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 347(2))."
    2 第百八条第一項第九号に掲げる事項(監査役に関するものに限る。)についての定めがある種類の株式を発行している場合における第三百二十九条第一項、第三百三十九条第一項、第三百四十一条並びに第三百四十三条第一項及び第二項の規定の適用については、第三百二十九条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「株主総会(監査役については、第百八条第二項第九号に定める事項についての定款の定めに従い、各種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会)」と、第三百三十九条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「株主総会(第四十一条第三項において準用する同条第一項の規定により又は第九十条第二項において準用する同条第一項の種類創立総会若しくは第三百四十七条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する第三百二十九条第一項の種類株主総会において選任された監査役については、当該監査役の選任に係る種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会(定款に別段の定めがある場合又は当該監査役の任期満了前に当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存在しなくなった場合にあっては、株主総会))」と、第三百四十一条中「第三百九条第一項」とあるのは「第三百九条第一項及び第三百二十四条」と、「株主総会」とあるのは「株主総会(第三百四十七条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する第三百二十九条第一項の種類株主総会を含む。)」と、第三百四十三条第一項及び第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「第三百四十七条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する第三百二十九条第一項の種類株主総会」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Revocation of a patent in whole or in part may be obtained on petition to or on a counter claim in a suit for infringement before the High Court Division on all or any of the following grounds, namely:- that the invention has been the subject of a valid prior grant of a patent in Bangladesh; that the true and first inventor or his legal representative or assign was not the applicant or one of the applicants for the patent; that the patent was obtained in fraud of the rights of the person applying for the revocation or of any person under or through whom he claims; that the invention was not, at the date of the patent, a manner of new manufacture or improvement; that the invention does not involve any inventive step, having regard to what was known or used prior to the date of the patent; that the invention is of no utility; that the complete specification does not sufficiently and fairly describe and ascertain the nature of the invention and the manner in which the invention is to be performed; that the complete specification does not sufficiently and clearly ascertain the scope of the invention claimed; that the patent was obtained on a false suggestion or representation; that the primary or intended use or exercise of the invention is contrary to law; that the patentee has contravened, or has not complied with, the conditions contained in the patent; that the complete specification does not disclose the best method of performance of the invention known to the applicant for the patent at the time when the specification was left at the Department of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks.
    特許の全部又は一部の取消しは、高等裁判所への請願書により、又は高等裁判所に係属している侵害訴訟中の反訴により、次の各号に掲げる事由のすべて又はいずれかを理由として得ることができる。すなわち、その発明はバングラデシュ国内において先願により有効に付与された特許の対象であること。真正かつ最先の発明者又はその法定代理人若しくは譲受人は当該特許出願人若しくは出願人の一人ではなかったこと。その特許は取消しを申請している者又は当該申請人がなす主張につき指示している者、若しくは当該申請人が代理している者の権利を詐害する目的で取得されたこと。その発明は特許された日において新規性を欠く製造方法又は改良であったこと。その発明は特許の日以前に知られていた又は使用されていたものに係るものであり、進歩性がないこと。その発明は有用性がないこと。完全な明細書は十分かつ正確に記載されておらず、発明の本質及び発明の実施方法が確認されないこと。完全な明細書から、請求する発明の範囲が十分かつ明瞭に確認されないこと。その特許は虚偽の示唆又は不実表示に基づいて取得されたこと。その発明の主な又は目的とする用途又は実施が法令に反すること。その特許権者が、当該特許に含まれる条件に違反し又は遵守していないこと。完全な明細書が、当該明細書が特許意匠商標庁に提出された当時に当該特許に係る出願人が知っていた、当該発明の最良の実施方法を開示していない。 - 特許庁
  • Of course, I intend to do so. This is a matter of political leadership. Trade in agricultural goods has existed since the Meiji period; the rice market was opened in the Edo period. It is said that the first futures trading was conducted in Osaka. Grain trading has a very long history and tradition and it has been promoted by the former Ministry of Agriculture and Commerce and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries as part of the agricultural policy. Trading in crude oil and other mineral resources has been promoted as part of the trade and commerce policy. For my part, I served as parliamentary secretary for international trade and industry 20 years ago. However, regarding financial products, which account for most of the trading, futures trading is under the jurisdiction of the FSA. I am well aware that ministerial sectionalism has existed until now. The reality is that individual ministries have been operating on the basis of sectionalism. In this respect, we must exercise political leadership. Under the current economic strategy, it is an important task to strengthen the Tokyo market’s international competitiveness and enhance its position from a broad perspective, so the three relevant ministers will discuss this matter and take necessary actions.
    当然ですね。これは政治主導でございまして、農産品と申しますか、その取引については明治時代から(存在し)、米の相場を始めたのは江戸時代であると。それから一番古い先物取引は、大阪で始まったという話もあるわけでございます。穀物の取引というのは大変古い歴史と伝統がありまして、それは昔で言う農商務省、農林省がきちっと農業政策の一環としてやっており、それから、原油をはじめ鉱物資源につきましては、私も20年前、通産政務次官をしましたので、これはまた通商政策の一環としてやっているということです。しかし、一番大きな金融取引等々につきましては、(その)先物取引は金融庁の所管でございますから、これはやはり各省縦割りというのが今まであったことは、もう私も重々知っておりますし、また各省は、縦割りの中で来たというのが現実でございまして、そこはまさに私は政治主導の必要があるというふうに思っておりますので、きちっと3大臣で話をして、大所高所に立ってきちっと国際競争力もこれは大事なときでございまして、東京のマーケットそのものの地位を高めるということも、今の経済戦略の中で大事な課題でもございますから、やっていきたいというふうに強く思っております。 - 金融庁
  • (2) Violation as provided for in the preceding Paragraph shall be deemed as violation of Article 19 (Prohibition of unfair trade practices) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (in the case where trade associations induce entrepreneurs to employ such acts as falls under the said violation, such acts as falls under unfair trade practices as provided for in the Article 8 (1) (v) of the said Act (Prohibition of unfair trade practices by trade associations)), and a cease and desist order under this Act shall be deemed as a cease and desist order under the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade, for the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 8-2 (Elimination measures against trade associations), Article 20 (Elimination measures against unfair trade practices), Article 25 (Absolute liability), Article 26 (Restriction on exercise of the right to claim for damages in court, prescription) and provisions of Section 2 (Procedures) of Chapter VIII (Excluding Article 46, Article 49 (3) through (5) inclusive, Article 50, Article 51, Article 53, Article 55 (2), (5) and (6), Article 59 (2), Article 65, Article 67, Article 69 (3), Article 70-2 (4), Article 70-9 through 70-11 inclusive, and Article 70-12 (1)). In this case, in Article 49 (1), the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the written (cease and desist) order"; and the term "the measures necessary to eliminate the violation or to ensure that the violation is eliminated" shall be replaced with "the matters necessary to cease such an act, or to prevent the resurgence of the said act, or to take any other matters including public notice of the matters relating to the implementation of such measures"; in paragraph (2) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "a written cease and desist order"; in Paragraph (6) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order," and the term "sixty days" shall be replaced with "thirty days"; in Article 70-15 the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order"; and in Article 70-21, the term "Chapter III" shall be replaced with "Chapter III (Excluding Article 13 (1) and Section 3).
    2 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第八条の二(排除措置)、第二十条(不公正な取引方法に係る排除措置)、第二十五条(無過失損害賠償責任)、第二十六条(損害賠償請求権の裁判上の主張の制限、消滅時効)及び第八章第二節(手続)(第四十六条、第四十九条第三項から第五項まで、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十三条、第五十五条第二項、第五項及び第六項、第五十九条第二項、第六十五条、第六十七条、第六十九条第三項、第七十条の二第四項、第七十条の九から第七十条の十一まで並びに第七十条の十二第一項を除く。)の規定の適用については、前項に規定する違反行為は同法第十九条(不公正な取引方法の禁止)の規定に違反する行為(事業者団体が事業者に当該行為に該当する行為をさせるようにする場合にあつては、同法第八条第一項第五号(事業者団体による不公正な取引方法の禁止)の不公正な取引方法に該当する行為)と、排除命令は排除措置命令とみなす。この場合において、同法第四十九条第一項(排除措置命令)中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「違反行為を排除し、又は違反行為が排除されたことを確保するために必要な措置」とあるのは「その行為の差止め若しくはその行為が再び行われることを防止するために必要な事項又はこれらの実施に関連する公示その他必要な事項」と、同条第二項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同条第六項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「六十日」とあるのは「三十日」と、同法第七十条の十五(事件記録の閲覧・謄写又は排除措置命令書等の謄抄本の交付)中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同法第七十条の二十一(行政手続法の適用除外)中「第三章」とあるのは「第三章(第十三条第一項及び第三節を除く。)」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
<前へ 1 2 .... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 次へ>

例文データの著作権について