「Two-Time」を含む例文一覧(7014)

＜前へ 1 2 .... 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 次へ＞
  • I was Minister for Financial Services, while Minister Yosano had the experience of serving as the Minister for International Trade and Industry. Minister Yosano strongly requested that two of us be allowed to join the debate at that time, when the Kan cabinet was in office, and as Mr. Kaieda, who was Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry at that time, agreed to that, we joined the debate on the draft of the scheme halfway through it. Therefore, I have certain knowledge about this matter. In relation to the support for Tokyo Electric Power, what kind of cooperation the company seeks from stakeholders and how stakeholders, including financial institutions, respond are matters to be determined through consultations between private business operators, so my understanding is that the Financial Services Agency is not in a position to make comments. In any case, regarding the compensation issue, it is important to pay damages compensation in a prompt and appropriate manner, and another important thing is, as you know, to avoid causing unnecessary, unexpected adverse effects on the stability of the financial and capital markets, on the principal premise that stable electricity supply should be ensured. We will continue to carefully monitor market developments.
    そのときの経過から私はある程度知っておりますけれども、東京電力に対する支援については、東京電力がステークホルダーに対してどのような協力を求めるか、それに対して金融機関を含むステークホルダーがどのように対応するかについては、民間事業者間で話し合われるべき事柄で、当局としてはお答えする立場にはないと認識しておりまして、いずれにいたしましても、東京電力の賠償問題については、迅速かつ適切な損害賠償の実施や、それからもう一個大事な点は、ご存じのように、電力の安定供給を確保することを大前提としつつ、金融・資本市場の安定に不要・不測の悪影響を生じさせないことが重要であり、引き続き市場の動向に注視してまいりたいと思っております。 - 金融庁
  • (6) Where a trustee has prepared the accounting books set forth in paragraph (2), the trustee shall preserve said books (if electromagnetic records have been prepared in lieu of documents by the method specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice, such electromagnetic records; if documents have been prepared in lieu of electromagnetic records, such documents) for ten years from the date of their preparation (or until the date of the completion of the liquidation of the trust if this occurs within said ten-year period; the same shall apply in the following paragraph); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the trustee has delivered said documents or copies thereof to the beneficiary (if there are two or more beneficiaries at the time in question, to all beneficiaries; if there is a trust caretaker at the time in question, to the trust caretaker; the same shall apply in paragraph (8)), or has provided the beneficiary with information on the matters recorded in said electromagnetic records by the method specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.
    ６　受託者は、第二項の会計帳簿を作成した場合には、その作成の日から十年間（当該期間内に信託の清算の結了があったときは、その日までの間。次項において同じ。）、当該会計帳簿（書面に代えて電磁的記録を法務省令で定める方法により作成した場合にあっては当該電磁的記録、電磁的記録に代えて書面を作成した場合にあっては当該書面）を保存しなければならない。ただし、受益者（二人以上の受益者が現に存する場合にあってはそのすべての受益者、信託管理人が現に存する場合にあっては信託管理人。第八項において同じ。）に対し、当該書類若しくはその写しを交付し、又は当該電磁的記録に記録された事項を法務省令で定める方法により提供したときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • A method wherein a signal is emitted each time from an optical transmitter set in a station and received by an optical receiver formed integrally with the transmitter at the termination of a transmission section formed of the optical wave guide, to make the two-way transmission of optical signals between the two stations connected through the optical wave guide, comprising: interconnecting the transmitter and the receiver as an integrated member; transmitting the signal of one way of the transmission through the optical wave guide during transmission stop in the other way of transmission comprising: using an LED as the transmitter, and a photodiode as the receiver, and interconnecting both as an integrated member; transmitting the signal of one way of the transmission through the optical wave guide during transmission stop in the other way of transmission ...
    光導波路を介して接続されたつのステーション間に光信号を双方向に伝送するため、信号がその都度ステーション内に配置された光送信器から放出され、光導波路によって形成される伝送区間の終端部では送信器と一体に構成された光受信器により受信されるようにした方法において、送信器と受信器が一体構成部材として互いに結合され、一方の送信方向の信号は他方の送信方向の送信休止期間中に光導波路を介して伝送され方法において、送信器として発光ダイオードが、受信器としてフォトダイオードが使用され、両者は一体構成部材として互いに結合され、一方の送信方向の信号は他方の送信方向の送信休止期間中に光導波路を介して伝送され発光ダイオードとして構成された光送信部をフォトダイオードとして構成された光受信部孔に挿入した構造が有利である。 - 特許庁
  • Where the decision on the objection under Section 64 has not been made within six months from the date of filing, and where, after the expiry of this time limit, the person filing the objection has filed a request for decision, the appeal from a decision of the Trade Mark Section or Trade Mark Division is directly admissible, in derogation of subsection (1), sentence 1, if the decision on the objection is not made within a period of two months from the receipt of the request. If the person raising the objection is opposed by another party to the proceedings, sentence 1 shall be applicable provided that the period of six months after the objection was raised is replaced by a period of 10 months. If the other party has also raised an objection, the other party must give his consent to the appeal under sentence 2. The written declaration of consent shall be attached to the appeal. If the other party does not also lodge an appeal within one month after service of the appeal under subsection (4), sentence 2, his objection is deemed to have been withdrawn. The remaining periods of time under sentences 1 and 2 shall be interrupted if the proceedings are suspended or if, on request of a party to the proceedings, an extension of time has been granted. The remaining periods of time under sentences 1 and 2 shall recommence to run after the suspension of the proceedings has been terminated or the extension of time granted has expired. After a decision on the objection has been issued, an appeal under sentences 1 and 2 shall no longer be admissible.
    第64条の規定に基づく不服申立に関する決定がその申立の日から6月以内に行われない場合，及び不服申立をした者がこの期間の満了後に決定の請求を行った場合には，商標課又は商標部門の決定に対する抗告は，不服申立に関する決定がその請求の受理から2月以内に行われないときは，[1]の第1文の規定は適用されず，直ちに認められる。不服申立をした者に対して，当該手続の他の当事者が対抗している場合には，第1文は，不服申立がなされた日から6月の期間を10月の期間と置き替えるという条件で適用されるものとする。手続における他の当事者も不服申立をしている場合には，当該他の当事者は，第2文に基づく抗告に対し同意しなければならない。書面による同意の宣言を抗告に添付しなければならない。手続における他の当事者が，[4]の第2文の規定に基づく抗告状の送達後1月以内に，抗告を提起しない場合は，その者がした不服申立は取り下げられたものとみなされる。第1文及び第2文の規定に基づく残存期間は，手続が中止されている場合又は手続における当事者の1人の請求により期間の延長が認められている場合は，進行が中断される。第1文及び第2文に規定する残存期間は，中止が終了した後又は与えられた期間が満了した後に進行を再開する。不服申立に関する決定が行われた後には，第1文及び第2文の規定に基づく抗告はもはや行うことができない。 - 特許庁
  • (4) Where a trustee has prepared the documents or electromagnetic records set forth in paragraph (1), the trustee shall preserve said documents (if electromagnetic records are prepared in lieu of said documents by the method specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice, such electromagnetic records) or said electromagnetic records (if documents are prepared in lieu of said electromagnetic records, such documents) for ten years from the date of their preparation (or until the date of the completion of the liquidation of the trust if this occurs within said ten-year period; the same shall apply in the following paragraph); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the trustee has delivered said documents or copies thereof to the beneficiary (if there are two or more beneficiaries at the time in question, to all beneficiaries; if there is a trust caretaker at the time in question, to the trust caretaker; the same shall apply in the proviso to paragraph (6)), or has provided the beneficiary with information on the matters recorded in said electromagnetic records by the method specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.
    ４　受託者は、第一項の書類又は電磁的記録を作成した場合には、その作成の日から十年間（当該期間内に信託の清算の結了があったときは、その日までの間。次項において同じ。）、当該書類（当該書類に代えて電磁的記録を法務省令で定める方法により作成した場合にあっては、当該電磁的記録）又は電磁的記録（当該電磁的記録に代えて書面を作成した場合にあっては、当該書面）を保存しなければならない。ただし、受益者（二人以上の受益者が現に存する場合にあってはそのすべての受益者、信託管理人が現に存する場合にあっては信託管理人。第六項ただし書において同じ。）に対し、当該書類若しくはその写しを交付し、又は当該電磁的記録に記録された事項を法務省令で定める方法により提供したときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 21-3 Article 20 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the right to claim damages under the preceding Article. In this case, the terms "Article 18," "the Securities Registration Statement or the Prospectus" and "three years" in Article 20 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21-2," "any of the documents specified in the items of Article 25(1) (excluding Article 25(1)(v) and (ix))" and "two years," respectively; and the part "seven years (excluding, where an order for suspension has been given under Article 10(1) or Article 11(1), the period from the day when the order was given to the day when the order was canceled) from the time when the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2) for Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities comes into effect or the delivery of the Prospectus is made" in Article 20 also shall be deemed to be replaced with "five years from the time when the document is submitted."
    第二十一条の三　第二十条の規定は、前条の規定による賠償の請求権について準用する。この場合において、第二十条中「第十八条」とあるのは「第二十一条の二」と、「有価証券届出書若しくは目論見書」とあるのは「第二十五条第一項各号（第五号及び第九号を除く。）に掲げる書類」と、「三年間」とあるのは「二年間」と、「当該有価証券の募集若しくは売出しに係る第四条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による届出がその効力を生じた時又は当該目論見書の交付があつた時から七年間（第十条第一項又は第十一条第一項の規定による停止命令があつた場合には、当該停止命令があつた日からその解除があつた日までの期間は、算入しない。）」とあるのは「当該書類が提出された時から五年間」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (b) The number of days for which shortening working hours and other measures from among those set forth in Article 23 paragraph 2 and for which measures specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare were taken (the number of days as counted from the day on which the first measure of said measures commenced until the day on which the last measure of said measures ended (when there is a period of Family Care Leave during that time, the number of days from the day on which Family Care Leave commenced until the day on which Family Care Leave ended shall be subtracted); when said measures are taken for two or more Care-requiring Conditions, the number of days obtained by totaling the number of days spent for each Care-requiring Condition from the day on which the first measure commenced until the day on which the last measure ended (when there is a period of Family Care Leave during that time, the number of days from the day on which Family Care Leave commenced until the day on which Family Care Leave ended shall be subtracted)).
    ロ　第二十三条第二項の措置のうち勤務時間の短縮その他の措置であって厚生労働省令で定めるものが講じられた日数（当該措置のうち最初に講じられた措置が開始された日から最後に講じられた措置が終了した日までの日数（その間に介護休業をした期間があるときは、当該介護休業を開始した日から当該介護休業を終了した日までの日数を差し引いた日数）とし、二以上の要介護状態について当該措置が講じられた場合にあっては、要介護状態ごとに、当該措置のうち最初に講じられた措置が開始された日から最後に講じられた措置が終了した日までの日数（その間に介護休業をした期間があるときは、当該介護休業を開始した日から当該介護休業を終了した日までの日数を差し引いた日数）を合算して得た日数とする。） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • When the SME Financing Facilitation Act was established just after the Lehman shock two years ago, it was given the duration of roughly one year. With Toyota suffering a 40 percent drop in car sales two years ago – my home prefecture, Fukuoka, Kyushu, produces more than one million cars and is the second largest car-producing prefecture after Aichi – one after another of the car makers, including Toyota and Nissan, fired temporary workers. It was under those circumstances that we launched this Act, but, at the same time, it is also true that in the context of a capitalist society and a free society, there is a concern that the Act might result in financial discipline deteriorating in the form of moral hazard on the part of borrowers. As it is, indeed, naturally an important factor in a free society, and the basic rule in borrowing money is to pay it back with interest, I do think it necessary to heed any impact of the Act.
    今般、同法の期限の延長期間を1年としたのは、法制当時よりも現在の経済状況は2年前のリーマン・ショック直後の中小企業金融円滑化法は1年程度の法律としていたのでありますが、現在の経済情勢は2年前のまさにトヨタ自動車の売り上げが4割減ったという、私の地元九州・福岡県は愛知県に次いで2番目に大きな自動車100万台以上生産しておりますけれども、トヨタだ日産だというのが本当に軒並み派遣切りをしまして、そのことを私はもろに感じたわけでございますが、そういった中、この法律を施行させて頂いたわけでございますけれども、同時に資本主義社会、自由主義社会においては、法によって借り手のモラルハザードという金融規律の低下が懸念されている。やっぱりそこは、当然、自由主義社会で大事なことでございまして、やっぱり借りたお金は利子をつけて返すということは原則でございますから、その影響も注視する必要があると思っております。 - 金融庁
  • (2) The applicant for a patent application in which the document and abstract in foreign language are attached to the application under the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as "foreign language written application") shall submit to the Commissioner of the Patent Office Japanese translations of the document and the abstract in foreign language within one year and two months from the date of filing of the patent application; provided, however, that where the written application in foreign language is a new patent application arising from the division of a patent application under Article 44(1), or a patent application arising from the conversion of an application under Article 46(1) or (2), or a patent application based on a utility model registration under Article 46-2(1), the applicant may submit Japanese translations of the document and the abstract in foreign language even after the lapse of the time limit prescribed in the main clause, but not later than two months following the division of a patent application, conversion of application or filing of patent application based on a utility model registration.
    ２　前項の規定により外国語書面及び外国語要約書面を願書に添付した特許出願（以下「外国語書面出願」という。）の出願人は、その特許出願の日から一年二月以内に外国語書面及び外国語要約書面の日本語による翻訳文を、特許庁長官に提出しなければならない。ただし、当該外国語書面出願が第四十四条第一項の規定による特許出願の分割に係る新たな特許出願、第四十六条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による出願の変更に係る特許出願又は第四十六条の二第一項の規定による実用新案登録に基づく特許出願である場合にあつては、本文の期間の経過後であつても、その特許出願の分割、出願の変更又は実用新案登録に基づく特許出願の日から二月以内に限り、外国語書面及び外国語要約書面の日本語による翻訳文を提出することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Always keeping wide awake at committee meetings is a challenge of sorts, so I am having a hard time. However, my tasks are simply an extension of what I was previously doing. In addition, as the FSA Commissioner is responsible for overseeing financial administration, I have to do my part as the Minister of Financial Services only when an incident of really great importance has occurred or when it is necessary to pass legislation in the Diet. Mr. Sato, the FSA Commissioner, is conducting all the administrative work on his responsibility, so my workload is just slightly more than that of two ministerial posts combined.
    委員会の席に居眠りをしないで座っているということはなかなか努力が要ることで、そこはちょっと辛いんですけれども、仕事の内容は今までやってきたことの延長線ですし、金融庁の仕事は、私は大臣といっても金融庁長官が金融行政全体の責任者ですから、そういう点では金融担当大臣というのは何か本当に大きなことが起きた時のみ仕事をするということなので、あるいは法律を国会に通す時に仕事をするということで、通常の金融庁にかかわる行政はすべて佐藤長官の責任でやっていただいているので、私としては３大臣というよりは2.1大臣ぐらいの感じで仕事をやっています。 - 金融庁
  • That prompted the late Mr. Ryutaro Hashimoto - at that time, Mr. Tatsuo Ozawa, Mr. Kunikichi Saito, Mr. Ryutaro Hashimoto and Mr. Masami Tanaka were the Big Four regarding health and welfare-related matters - to come to Mr.　Ibuki and me and tell us, “Please stop making trouble, because this system was created when those two great men (Ozawa and Saito) were directors at the Ministry of Health and Welfare and at the Ministry of Labour.”
    そんなことで、伊吹文明さんと私とか、やはりこれをどうにかきちんとした国家組織にするなり、あるいはもう完全に地方に移管してしまうなりしないとどうしてもおかしいということを、我々、当時、若手でしたから、騒いでおりましたら、もう亡くなられた橋本龍太郎さんが、当時、小沢辰男さん、斎藤邦吉さん、橋本龍太郎さん、田中正巳さんというのが厚生四天王でございまして、龍ちゃんは先輩（で）、当選回数は多かったのですけれども若かったですから、大体、伊吹さんと私のところに来まして、「まあ、あの2人の大先輩が、昔、厚生省と労働省の課長の時に作った制度だから、自見君、あまり難しいことを言うな」などと、だいぶ頭を下げられた経験もよく覚えております。 - 金融庁
  • The applicant may divide his application into two or more divisional applications, but none of them may entail any broadening of the invention or of the disclosure contained in the application as filed. Each divisional application shall retain the benefit of the filing date of the original application. Division of the application by the applicant shall take place before publication, and at the request of the competent office at any time during processing. Where division is requested or a proposal to divide the application accepted, those documents shall be filed and those procedures applied that correspond to the new form of application.
    分割後の出願の何れにも発明自体の拡張も出願書類に含まれる開示事項の拡張も伴わないことを条件に，出願人は自己の特許出願を複数の特許出願に分割することができる。分割された出願の各々は，当初出願の出願日を維持する。出願人による特許出願の分割は原則として公告前に行わなければならないが，所轄当局の要求により分割する場合は出願処理の手続中何時でも行うことができる。分割請求がなされ又は所轄当局の分割提案が受け入れられた場合は，出願人は対応する新たな産業財産出願書類を提出し新規の手続が開始される。 - 特許庁
  • If a request for conversion of a filed or registered Community trade mark has been transmitted to the Patent Office under Article 109(3) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation, the applicant shall pay a fee as specified in the schedule of fees within a period of two months from the receipt of the request for conversion by the Patent Office. Where conversion is requested in respect of goods or services coming under more than three classes of the classification of goods and services, a class fee as specified in the schedule of fees shall also be payable for each further class. If the fee is not paid in time, the request for conversion shall be deemed not to have been filed.
    出願又は登録された共同体商標の転換の請求が，共同体商標規則第109条(3)の規定に基づき特許庁に送付された場合は，請求者は，特許庁がその転換の請求を受理したときから2月以内に料金表に規定される手数料を納付しなければならない。商品及びサービスの分類の3類を超える類に属する商品又はサービスについて転換が請求された場合は，料金表に規定された類料金は，3類を超える類の各類毎に納付しなければならない。手数料が納付されない場合は，転換の請求は提出されなかったものとみなされる。 - 特許庁
  • If, before the day on which this section comes into force, a person has paid a prescribed fee applicable to a small entity, within the meaning of the Patent Rules as they read at the time of payment, but should have paid the prescribed fee applicable to an entity other than a small entity and a payment equivalent to the difference between the two amounts is submitted to the Commissioner in accordance with subsection (2) either before or no later than twelve months after that day, the payment is deemed to have been paid on the day on which the prescribed fee was paid, regardless of whether an action or other proceeding relating to the patent or patent application in respect of which the fee was payable has been commenced or decided.
    本条が施行される日前に，ある者が納付時に有効な特許規則の意味の範疇における小法人に適用される所定の手数料を納付したが，小法人以外の法人に適用される手数料を納付すべきであった場合に，その日後12月より前にか又は12月より遅れることなく(2)に従って，その二つの額の差額と同額の納付が長官にされるならば，手数料が納付されなければならない特許又は特許出願に関する訴訟その他の手続が開始又は決定していたか否かを問わず，その納付は，所定の手数料が納付された日に支払われたものとみなされる。 - 特許庁
  • There are two well-known stories concerning subsequent events: one is that Doman then became Seimei's student as had been agreed, while the other is that while Seimei was away visiting China as a member of Kentoshi and training under the guidance of 伯道上人, Doman and Seimei's wife began to have an affair and, upon Seimei's return, using a magic he had mastered by sneaking a look at a book that 伯道上人 had given to Seimei, Doman won a duel to the death with Seimei, which prompted 伯道上人to come to Japan as his instincts alerted him to Seimei's death, whereupon he resuscitated Seimei and decapitated Doman; some time later, Seimei wrote some books that were subsequently compiled into 'Kinugyokutoshu'.
    この後、約束通り道満は晴明の弟子となった、と言われているという話や、遣唐使として派遣され唐の伯道上人のもとで修行をしていた晴明の留守中に晴明の妻とねんごろになり不義密通を始めていた道満が、晴明の唐からの帰国後に伯道上人から授かった書を盗み見て身につけた呪術で晴明との命を賭けた対決に勝利して晴明を殺害し、第六感で晴明の死を悟った伯道上人が急遽来日して呪術で晴明を蘇生させ道満を斬首、その後に晴明は書を発展させて「金烏玉兎集」にまとめ上げたといった話が有名である。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • Susanoo said, "There is gold and silver in the islands of Karakuni (considered to be a part of present-day Korea), so it is not good that the country controlled by my children doesn't have any ships." Then, he pulled out some hairs of his beard and scattered them, and then, they turned into cedars. He continued pulling out some hairs from parts of his body. The hairs he picked from his chest turned into hinoki (Japanese cypresses), the hairs he picked from his buttocks turned into maki (Japanese yew pines), and his plucked eyebrows turned into camphor trees. After that, he decided on the use of each tree and suggested, "Cedars and camphor trees should be used for making ships, Japanese cypresses should be used for constructing palaces, Japanese yew pines should be used for coffins when the body is buried. Everyone should join together to sow seeds of many trees used for these various purposes and grow many more trees." Around this time, he had a son, Isotakeru, and two daughters, Oyatsu-hime and Tsumatsu-hime. These three gods contributed to sowing seeds and growing trees all across the nation, and then they moved to Kii Province (the southern part of present-day Mie and Wakayama Prefectures) where they were enshrined. After that, Susanoo finally entered Ne-no-kuni (underworld) via Kumanarinotake.
    一書曰素戔嗚尊曰韓郷之嶋是有金銀若使吾兒所御之國不有浮寶者未是佳也乃拔鬚髯散之即成杉又拔散胸毛是成檜尻毛是成柀眉毛是成櫲樟已而定其當用乃稱之曰杉及櫲樟此兩樹者可以爲浮寶檜可以爲瑞宮之材柀可以爲顯見蒼生奥津棄戸將臥之具夫須噉八十木種皆能播生于時素戔嗚尊之子號曰五十猛命妹大屋津姫命次枛津姫命凡此三神亦能分布木種即奉渡於紀伊國也然後素戔嗚尊居熊成峯而遂入於根國者矣棄戸此云須多杯柀此云磨紀 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • (2) In the case where a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. has been subject to two or more foreign corporation taxes or to a foreign corporation tax twice or more on its income for a taxable business year, when a domestic corporation related to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. seeks the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) (including the cases where it is applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article by deeming the amount to be as specified therein; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or Article 68-91(1) (including the cases where it is applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article by deeming the amount to be as specified therein; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) of the Act, regarding the amount of the said foreign corporation taxes in two or more business years or consolidated business years; with respect to the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act for a business year following the first one of the said two or more business years or consolidated business years, the amount obtained by deducting the amount listed in item (ii) (the amount listed in item (iii), when seeking the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act for the first time after receiving the application of the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act) from the amount listed in item (i) shall be deemed to be the calculated amount prescribed in the preceding paragraph:
    ２　特定外国子会社等につきその課税対象年度の所得に対して二以上の外国法人税が課され、又は二回以上にわたつて外国法人税が課された場合において、当該特定外国子会社等に係る内国法人がその二以上の事業年度又は連結事業年度において当該外国法人税の額につき法第六十六条の七第一項（同条第二項の規定によりみなして適用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）又は第六十八条の九十一第一項（同条第二項の規定によりみなして適用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の規定の適用を受けるときは、当該二以上の事業年度又は連結事業年度のうち最初の事業年度又は連結事業年度後の事業年度に係る法第六十六条の七第一項の規定の適用については、第一号に掲げる金額から第二号に掲げる金額（法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定の適用を受けた場合で、その適用を受けた後最初に法第六十六条の七第一項の規定の適用を受けるときは、第三号に掲げる金額）を控除した金額をもつて前項に規定する計算した金額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) With regard to a Futures Commission Merchant who has received a license under Article 41, paragraph (1) of the Commodity Exchange Act at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, in the case where the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets) exceeds the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets), the standard amount prescribed in Article 49, paragraph (1) of the same Act for said Futures Commission Merchant shall be the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision, for one year from the day of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision.
    ２　この政令の施行の際現に商品取引所法第四十一条第一項の許可を受けている商品取引員について、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）が改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）を超えている場合には、当該商品取引員の同法第四十九条第一項に規定する基準額は、この政令の施行の日から一年間は、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条の規定にかかわらず、改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • With regard to a Futures Commission Merchant who has received a license under Article 41, paragraph 1 of the Commodity Exchange Act at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, in the case where the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets) exceeds the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets), the standard amount prescribed in Article 49, paragraph 1 of the same Act for said Futures Commission Merchant shall be the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision, for one year from the day of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision.
    この政令の施行の際現に商品取引所法第四十一条第一項の許可を受けている商品取引員について、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）が改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）を超えている場合には、当該商品取引員の同法第四十九条第一項に規定する基準額は、この政令の施行の日から一年間は、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条の規定にかかわらず、改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額とする。 - 経済産業省
  • (2) Until the date when the notification of the Patent Office regarding the grant of patent is published, the applicant, in accordance with Section 38, Paragraph one of this Law, without exceeding the extent of the patent application, may divide it in two or more applications, maintaining the filing and priority date of the initial application for each of them. The requirements of this Section, Section 27, Section 28, Paragraphs one, five and six, Sections 30, 31 and 32 shall be applied to each divisional application. If the applicant fails to submit the necessary documents and materials which relate to the divisional patent application or to pay the State fee within a time period of three months from the date of the receipt of the request regarding the division of the application by the Patent Office, the divisional application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.
    (2) 出願人は，特許付与に関する特許庁の通知が第38条(1)に基づいて公告される日まで，特許出願の範囲を超えることなく，当該出願を2以上の出願に分割することができ，この場合は，その各々について，元の出願の出願日及び優先日が維持される。本条，第27条，第28条(1)，(5)及び(6)，第30条，第31条並びに第32条の要件を各分割出願に適用する。出願人が，出願の分割に関する請求を特許庁が受領した日から3月以内に分割特許出願に関して必要な書類及び資料を提出しなかった場合，又は国の手数料を納付しなかった場合は，分割出願は取り下げられたものとみなす。 - 特許庁
  • (1) Where registered encumbrances exist in relation to a trademark or a claim of ownership is pending and the owner has not renewed the trademark, said trademark shall not lapse prior to the encumbrance being lifted or the claim being finally rejected. If, as a result of these procedures, a change in the ownership of the trademark occurs, the new owner may renew it within a period of two months from the date on which the decision regarding the claim has become final or from the time when the competent authority or court has notified the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office of the final adjudication concerning the seized trademark. Once this period has expired, the trademark shall lapse unless it has been renewed.
    (1) 商標に関して登録質権が存在するか又は所有権請求が係属中であり，所有者が当該商標を更新していない場合は，当該商標は質権が解除される又は請求が最終的に拒絶されるまでは失効しないものとする。このような手続の結果として，商標の所有権の変更が発生した場合は，新所有者は，当該請求に関する決定が確定した日，又は所轄官庁若しくは裁判所が差し押さえられた商標に関する最終決定をスペイン特許商標庁に通知した日から2月の期間内に，当該商標を更新することができる。この期間が満了した場合は，商標は，更新されていない限り，失効する。 - 特許庁
  • (2) For the time being, with regard to a child admitted in an institution for orthopedically impaired children pursuant to the provision of Article 27 paragraph (1) item (iii) or a child provided in Article 43-3 and hospitalized in a Designated Medical Institution based on an entrustment pursuant to paragraph (2) of the same Article whose level of the disability is serious, when a prefectural governor finds that welfare of the child is likely to be impaired unless his/her admission or hospitalization is continued, the prefectural government may, notwithstanding the provision of Article 31 paragraph (3), take a measure to continue his/her admission in the institution for orthopedically impaired children or the entrustment pursuant to the provision of Article 27 paragraph (2), or change either of these two measures to the other one, even after he/she attains the age of 20.
    ２　都道府県は、第三十一条第三項の規定にかかわらず、当分の間、第二十七条第一項第三号の規定により肢体不自由児施設に入所した児童又は同条第二項の規定による委託により指定医療機関に入院した第四十三条の三に規定する児童であつてその障害の程度が重度であるものについて、引き続いて入所又は入院させておかなければその者の福祉を損なうおそれがあると認めるときは、満二十歳に達した後においても、引き続きその者を肢体不自由児施設に在所させ、若しくは第二十七条第二項の規定による委託を継続し、又はこれらの措置を相互に変更する措置を採ることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (iii) Specified foreign subsidiary corporation: A foreign corporation in which, at any time during the period from the first day of the earliest business year that commenced within two years before the first day of the business year of the said foreign corporation that includes the date of the capital contribution in kind, until that date of the capital contribution in kind, residents (meaning residents prescribed in Article 2(1)(i)-2; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), domestic corporations and specially-related nonresidents (meaning nonresidents prescribed in Article 2(1)(i)-2 who have a special relationship specified by a Cabinet Order with residents or domestic corporations) hold shares that account for more than 50 percent of the total number or total amount of shares, etc. of the foreign corporation, and which falls under the category of specified foreign corporation with less tax burden
    三　特定外国子法人　外国法人で、その現物出資の日を含む当該外国法人の事業年度開始の日前二年以内に開始した各事業年度のうち最も古い事業年度開始の日からその現物出資の日までの期間内のいずれかの時において、居住者（第二条第一項第一号の二に規定する居住者をいう。以下この号において同じ。）、内国法人及び特殊関係非居住者（居住者又は内国法人と政令で定める特殊の関係のある同項第一号の二に規定する非居住者をいう。）が、その発行済株式等の総数又は総額の百分の五十を超える数又は金額の株式を有するもののうち、特定軽課税外国法人に該当するものをいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) Where an application is converted under the preceding two paragraphs, the application for a utility model registration shall be deemed to have been filed at the time of filing of the patent application or the application for a design registration; provided, however, that this shall not apply for the purposes of application of Article 3-2 of this Act or Article 29-2 of the Patent Act where the application for a utility model registration falls under another application for a utility model registration prescribed in Article 3-2 of this Act or an application for a utility model registration prescribed in Article 29-2 of the Patent Act, and Articles 30(4) and 43 (1) of the Patent Act (including mutatis mutandis application of Article 43(1) of the said Act under Article 43-2(3) of the said Act as applied mutatis mutandis under the Article 11(1)).
    ３　前二項の規定による出願の変更があつたときは、その実用新案登録出願は、その特許出願又は意匠登録出願の時にしたものとみなす。ただし、その実用新案登録出願が第三条の二に規定する他の実用新案登録出願又は特許法第二十九条の二に規定する実用新案登録出願に該当する場合におけるこれらの規定の適用、第八条第四項の規定の適用並びに次条第一項において準用する同法第三十条第四項及び第四十三条第一項（次条第一項において準用する同法第四十三条の二第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (a) Where, with regard to the amount of the rehabilitation debtor's salary or similar regular income, reemployment or any other event that should cause a fluctuation amounting to not less than one-fifth of his/her annual income has occurred at a certain time within two years prior to the submission of the proposed rehabilitation plan: The amount obtained by deducting, from the total income earned during the period from when such event occurred until the proposed rehabilitation plan was submitted, the amount of income tax, prefectural inhabitants tax or Tokyo inhabitants tax on individuals, and municipal inhabitants tax or special ward inhabitants tax on individuals as well as social insurance premiums prescribed in Article 74(2) of the Income Tax Act (Act No. 33 of 1965) (referred to as "income tax, etc." in (b) and (c)) imposed on such total amount, as converted into the amount per year
    イ　再生債務者の給与又はこれに類する定期的な収入の額について、再生計画案の提出前二年間の途中で再就職その他の年収について五分の一以上の変動を生ずべき事由が生じた場合　当該事由が生じた時から再生計画案を提出した時までの間の収入の合計額からこれに対する所得税、個人の道府県民税又は都民税及び個人の市町村民税又は特別区民税並びに所得税法（昭和四十年法律第三十三号）第七十四条第二項に規定する社会保険料（ロ及びハにおいて「所得税等」という。）に相当する額を控除した額を一年間当たりの額に換算した額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • When making comparisons between two widely separated points in time, attention needs to be paid to changes in demographic structure and the number of persons in work by size of employer. Nevertheless, it is worth noting a number of points in relation to factors such as the ratio of employer to employee incomes35) and the risk aversion analyzed below. These are that the increase in the proportion of people becoming self-employed proprietors is lower at relatively larger enterprises, that the difference between younger and middle-aged workers and older workers at enterprises with 100 or more workers was not as pronounced in 1987 as the difference between younger and middle-aged workers and older workers at enterprises with 99 or fewer workers, and that the proportion of young and middle-aged workers at enterprises with 10~99 workers was lower in 2002 and had come to resemble the trend regarding former employees of enterprises with 100 or more workers.
    間隔が長期に開いた二時点間の比較を行う上では人口構成や規模別就業者数の変化に注意を払う必要が有るが、企業規模が相対的に大きいほど自営業主へ転職する者に占める割合は低いことや、1987年では従業者100人以上の企業規模における若・中年者と高齢者との差は、99人以下の企業規模における若・中年者と高齢者ほどの顕著なものではなかったこと、2002年には10人以上99人以下規模企業の若・中年転職者の占める割合が低下し100人以上の企業規模出身者と傾向が似たことは、事業者対被雇用者の収入比率35や次に分析するリスク回避志向等との関係で注目に値するのである。 - 経済産業省
  • Article 15 (1) Among the employers with a contractor who carries out a part of the work in an undertaking executed at one place (where as there exists two or more contracts under which a part of the work in the undertaking is begun, there exist two or more such employers, employer who ordered the earliest contract; hereinafter referred to as the "Principal Employer"), one (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Principal Employer") who carries on an undertaking (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Undertaking") related to construction or other industries prescribed by Cabinet Order, shall, where workers employed by him/her and by his/her contractors (where the work in the said undertaking of the principal employer is carried out under subcontracts of several levels, subcontractors who are party to subsequent subcontractors shall be included; hereinafter referred to as "related contractors") perform work at the said place, appoint an overall safety and health controller in order to prevent industrial accidents which may occur as a result of the work carried out by these workers at the same place, and have him/her direct the work of Principal Safety and Health Supervisors, and at the same time exercise overall control over the matters provided for in each item of paragraph (1) of Article 30; provided that this shall not apply where the number of such workers does not reach the figure provided for by Cabinet Order.
    第十五条　事業者で、一の場所において行う事業の仕事の一部を請負人に請け負わせているもの（当該事業の仕事の一部を請け負わせる契約が二以上あるため、その者が二以上あることとなるときは、当該請負契約のうちの最も先次の請負契約における注文者とする。以下「元方事業者」という。）のうち、建設業その他政令で定める業種に属する事業（以下「特定事業」という。）を行う者（以下「特定元方事業者」という。）は、その労働者及びその請負人（元方事業者の当該事業の仕事が数次の請負契約によつて行われるときは、当該請負人の請負契約の後次のすべての請負契約の当事者である請負人を含む。以下「関係請負人」という。）の労働者が当該場所において作業を行うときは、これらの労働者の作業が同一の場所において行われることによつて生ずる労働災害を防止するため、統括安全衛生責任者を選任し、その者に元方安全衛生管理者の指揮をさせるとともに、第三十条第一項各号の事項を統括管理させなければならない。ただし、これらの労働者の数が政令で定める数未満であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), the Board of Appeal of the Federal Patent Court shall issue a decision 1. if a party requests the decision and no other party has filed an opposition within two months after service of the request, or 2. upon the request of only one party if at least 15 months have lapsed since expiry of the opposition time limit, or in the case of a request of an intervening party if at least 15 months have lapsed since declaration of intervention. This shall not apply if the Patent Division has served a summons to a hearing or the decision on the opposition within three months of receipt of the request for a decision by the Patent Court. In other respects, Sections 59 to 62, 69 to 71 and 86 to 99 shall apply mutandis mutandis.
    (2) (1)に拘らず，連邦特許裁判所の審判部は，次の場合に決定を行う。 1. 1の当事者が決定を請求し，他の何れの当事者も，その請求の送達から 2月以内に，異議を唱えなかったとき，又は2. 一方の当事者のみからの請求があったとき。ただし，異議申立期限の到来から最低 15月が経過しているか，又は参加人からの請求の場合は，当該参加宣言から最低 15月が経過していることを条件とする。この規定は，特許部が，連邦特許裁判所による決定を求める請求を受領してから 3月以内に，聴聞への召喚状又は異議申立についての決定を送達している場合は，適用されない。それ以外には，第 59条から第 62条まで，第 69条から第 71条まで，及び第 86条から第 99条までが準用される。 - 特許庁
  • This also affected the real economy – for instance, production in Toyota's factory in Fukuoka Prefecture, my home prefecture, dropped by 40 percent two years ago and occurrences like that explain why Japan has been in the situation that it is in now since then. It was against this background that the Dodd-Frank Act was implemented in the U.S. And, at that very time of historical significance, I met with FRB Chairman Bernanke and Mr. Volcker. Under the Volcker Rule, commercial banks may engage in a high-risk, high-return business on demand from customers, but not for their own accounts. In my view, this is the very core of the new Dodd-Frank Act. This is another case of a significant sea change. It was by luck that I had an opportunity to visit the U.S. in those days in the capacity of the Minister for Financial Services.
    そのことが実体経済にも影響を及ぼして、2年前、私の福岡県にもトヨタ自動車の工場がございますが、あそこの生産は4割落ちまして、それ以来、本当に日本だって、今、大変こういう立場になっているわけでございますが、そういった中でドッド・フランク法というのを作った。まさにそういった歴史的な時期に、FRBのバーナンキ議長、それからボルカーさん、ボルカー・ルールですね。これはご存じのように、商業銀行の中でハイリスク・ハイリターンのことを、お客様から頼まれたらおこなってもよいけれども、自己勘定でしてはいけないと。これは今度のドッド・フランク法の一番のコアの部分だと思います。これは非常に大きなコペルニクス的転換でございまして、しかし、そういった時代にたまたま金融（担当）大臣としてアメリカに行かせていただいた。 - 金融庁
  • (3) For the purpose of the application of the provisions of item (iv), paragraph (1) and items (ii) and (iii) of paragraph (2) of Article 71, item (iv), paragraph (1) and items (ii) and (iii) of paragraph (2) of Article 72, Article 160 (excluding item (i) of paragraph (1)), Article 162 (excluding item (ii) of paragraph (1)), paragraph (2) of Article 163, paragraph (1) of Article 164 (including the cases where that paragraph is applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (1) of that article), Article 166, and paragraph (2) of Article 167 (including the cases where that paragraph is applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (2) of Article 170) of the Bankruptcy Act in cases where a ruling to commence bankruptcy procedures has been made under the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, the petition for the commencement of bankruptcy procedures shall be deemed to have been filed at the time when the petition in each of the following items for the case categories listed in each such items were filed:
    ３　前二項の規定により破産手続開始の決定があった場合における破産法第七十一条第一項第四号並びに第二項第二号及び第三号、第七十二条第一項第四号並びに第二項第二号及び第三号、第百六十条（第一項第一号を除く。）、第百六十二条（第一項第二号を除く。）、第百六十三条第二項、第百六十四条第一項（同条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第百六十六条並びに第百六十七条第二項（同法第百七十条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、当該各号に定める申立てがあった時に破産手続開始の申立てがあったものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, where terms of trust contain a provision concerning the division of duties among the trustees, when either of these trustees has assumed an obligation to a third party in the course of administering trust affairs pursuant to such provisions, the other trustees shall be liable only by using property that belongs to the trust property to perform the obligation; provided, however, that where the third party knew, at the time of the act causing the assumption of the obligation, that said act was conducted in the course of administering trust affairs and that there were two or more trustees for the trust, and did not know and was not negligent in failing to know that the terms of trust contained provisions concerning the division of duties among the trustees, the other trustee(s) may not duly assert such provisions on the division of duties against the third party.
    ２　前項の規定にかかわらず、信託行為に受託者の職務の分掌に関する定めがある場合において、ある受託者がその定めに従い信託事務を処理するに当たって第三者に対し債務を負担したときは、他の受託者は、信託財産に属する財産のみをもってこれを履行する責任を負う。ただし、当該第三者が、その債務の負担の原因である行為の当時、当該行為が信託事務の処理としてされたこと及び受託者が二人以上ある信託であることを知っていた場合であって、信託行為に受託者の職務の分掌に関する定めがあることを知らず、かつ、知らなかったことにつき過失がなかったときは、当該他の受託者は、これをもって当該第三者に対抗することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) The provisions of Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act shall not apply to a license applicant as set forth in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act who has committed that he/she will receive the transfer of insurance contracts from a Specified Insurer or succeed to insurance contracts from a Specified Insurer (limited to persons who have made an application for approval of the transfer or succession of that insurance contract pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, paragraphs (7), (8), (11) and (12) of the Supplementary Provisions until the date two years after the Effective Date, and to persons whose capital amount at the time of the application for that license exceeds five hundred million yen and is less than the amount specified by a Cabinet Order as set forth in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Law) for a period of five years counting from the Effective Date.
    ２　新保険業法第六条第一項の規定は、特定保険業者から保険契約の移転を受け、又は保険契約を承継することを約する新保険業法第三条第一項の免許の申請者（施行日から起算して二年を経過する日までの間に附則第四条第七項、第八項、第十一項又は第十二項の規定による当該保険契約の移転又は承継の認可の申請及び当該免許の申請を行う者であって、当該免許の申請のときに資本金の額又は基金の総額が五億円を上回り、新保険業法第六条第一項の政令で定める額に満たない者に限る。）については、施行日から起算して五年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (a) If an applicant fails to prosecute his application within the required time as provided in these Regulations, the application shall be deemed withdrawn. (b) The time for reply may be extended only for good and sufficient cause, and for a reasonable time specified. Any request for such extension must be filed on or before the day on which action by the applicant is due. The Examiner may grant a maximum of two extensions, provided that the aggregate period granted inclusive of the initial period allowed to file the response, shall not exceed six months from mailing date of the official action requiring such response. (c) Prosecution of an application to save it from withdrawal must include such complete and proper action as the condition of the case may require. Any amendment not responsive to the last official action shall not operate to save the application from being deemed withdrawn. (d) When action by the applicant is a bona fide attempt to advance the case to final action, and is substantially a complete response to the Examiner’s action, but consideration of some matter or compliance with some requirements has been inadvertently omitted, opportunity to explain and supply the omission may be given before the question of withdrawal is considered. (e) Prompt ratification or filing of a correctly signed copy may be accepted in case of an unsigned or improperly signed paper.
    (a)出願人が本規則に規定する期間内に出願を遂行しなかった場合は，当該出願は，取り下げられたものとみなされる。 (b)応答期間は，適切かつ十分な理由がある場合に限り，かつ，指定された合理的な期間にわたり，延長することができる。当該延長の請求は，出願人による応答の期限が到来する日以前にしなければならない。審査官は，最大2回まで延長を認めることができるが，ただし，応答書を提出するために認められた当初期間を含む合計期間は，当該応答を求める庁の処分書の郵送日から6月を超えないものとする。 (c)出願が取り下げられたとみなされないようにするための出願の遂行には，当該事案の事情から必要とされる完全かつ適切な行為を含むものとする。庁による最終処分に応答していない補正は，当該出願を取り下げたとみなされることを防ぐことができない。 (d)出願人による行為が，事案を最終処分に進めるための善意の試みであり，審査官の処分に対する実質的には完全な応答であるにも拘らず，ある事項の検討又はある要件の遵守を不注意により怠っている場合は，取下の問題を検討する前に，当該不作為を説明し，埋め合わせる機会を与えることができる。 (e)署名が脱落した又は署名が不適切な文書の場合においては，正しく署名された写しの速やかな追認又は提出が認められる。 - 特許庁
  • As individual ministries and agencies have maintained strong powers in their areas of jurisdiction over the 65 years since the end of World War II, politicians, even the Prime Ministers, did not succeed in tearing down the wall of sectionalism. Mr. Yoshiro Mori (a former Prime Minister) supported the umbrella organization for kindergartens, while nursery schools basically had the support of Mr. Ryutaro Hashimoto. As nursery schools were divided into two groups, Mr. Hashimoto supported one of them and I supported the other. From my experience, I know that there was fierce sectionalism during the era of LDP government and the wall that separated ministries was really thick. I have the impression, based on my experience of spending my time in a governing party, an opposition party and a governing party again, that that situation has eventually led to the change of government. While I am ready to accept criticism straightforwardly, I believe that this must be done from the standpoint of the people following the change of government.
    ですから、やっぱり日本国も戦後65年たちまして、各省庁が縦割りで物凄い権限を持っており、総理大臣をした政治家でもうまくいかなかったのです。幼稚園連盟の方の応援団長は森喜朗さんで、保育園の方は基本的に橋本龍太郎さんでした。保育園は2つに分かれていましたから、橋本龍太郎さんと私がやっていました。私の経験として、自由民主党の時代は縦割り行政というのは凄まじく、本当に役所の壁というのは厚かったのです。それが結局、政権交代に結びついたというようなところも、私は現実に与党、野党、与党を経験した人間としてあると思います。国民目線に対して、色々と政権交代を、ご批判されることもありますし、ご批判は率直に受けますけれども、やはりそういったことは、今の政権交代でやっていくべきことだと思っています。 - 金融庁
  • Article 34 (1) Where the shareholders meeting of a Bank passes a resolution for transferring the whole of its business or for acquiring the whole of the other's business (or, in the case where a Bank acquires the whole of the other's business not through the resolution required by Article 467(1) (Approvals of Assignment of Business) of the Companies Act pursuant to the provision of Article 468 (Cases where Approval of Assignment of Business is not Required) of that Act, where its board of directors passes a resolution for acquiring such business or its executive officers decide to acquire such business), the Bank shall, within two weeks from the day of the resolution or decision, make public notice, in the official gazette, of the gist of the resolution or the decision and to the effect that any creditors who have any objection to the transfer of the whole of its business or acquisition of the whole of the other's business ought to file an objection within a specified period of time, and shall give notice of the same separately to each known creditor other than Depositors, etc. or any other creditors specified by a Cabinet Order, if any.
    第三十四条　銀行を当事者とする事業の全部の譲渡又は譲受けについて株主総会の決議（会社法第四百六十八条（事業譲渡等の承認を要しない場合）の規定により同法第四百六十七条第一項（事業譲渡等の承認等）の決議によらずに事業の全部の譲受けを行う場合には、取締役会の決議又は執行役の決定）がされたときは、当該銀行は、当該決議又は決定の日から二週間以内に、当該決議又は決定の要旨及び当該事業の全部の譲渡又は譲受けに異議のある債権者は一定の期間内に異議を述べるべき旨を官報に公告し、かつ、預金者等その他政令で定める債権者以外の知れている債権者には、各別にこれを催告しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • In the case where the Futures Commission Merchant Association prescribed in Article 54-3, paragraph 1 of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision by the Revising Act has been established at the time of the promulgation of the Revising Act, when said Futures Commission Merchant Association was approved to amend its articles of incorporation to become a commodity futures association under the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act revised by the Revising Act pursuant to the provisions of Article 8, paragraph 1 of the Supplementary Provisions of the Revising Act, registration of dissolution shall be completed with regard to the Futures Commission Merchant Association and registration prescribed in Article 3 of the Association Registration Order (Cabinet Order No. 29 of 1964) shall be completed with regard to the commodity futures association, within two weeks from the day on which the approval for the amendment of articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 8, paragraph 4 of the Supplementary Provisions of the Revising Act becomes effective at the location of its principal office and within three weeks from such day at the location of its secondary offices.
    改正法の公布の際既に改正法による改正前の商品取引所法第五十四条の三第一項に規定する商品取引員協会が設立されている場合において、当該商品取引員協会が、改正法附則第八条第一項の規定により、改正法による改正後の商品取引所法の規定による商品先物取引協会となるための定款の変更の認可を受けたときは、同条第四項に規定する定款の変更の認可の効力が発生した日から主たる事務所の所在地においては二週間以内に、従たる事務所の所在地においては三週間以内に、商品取引員協会については解散の登記、商品先物取引協会については組合等登記令（昭和三十九年政令第二十九号）第三条に定める登記をしなければならない。 - 経済産業省
  • Where the application concerns a microbiological process or the product thereof and involves the use of a microorganism which cannot be sufficiently disclosed in the application in such a way as to enable the invention to be carried out by a person skilled in the art, and such material is not available to the public, the invention shall only be regarded as being disclosed if: (a) A culture of the microorganism has been deposited in a depositary institution before filing the application; (b) The depositary institution and the file number of the culture deposit are stated in the application. If this information is not yet available at the time of filing the application, the said information shall be submitted within two months from request of the Examiner. Publication of the application under Section 44, IP CODE shall be held pending submission of said information; and (c) The application as filed gives relevant information as is available to the applicant on the characteristics of the microorganism.
    出願が微生物学的方法又はこれにより得られる物に関連し，かつ，微生物の使用を必要とする場合において，その発明を当該技術の熟練者が実施することができるような方法では，その微生物を出願に十分に開示することができず，また，その微生物を公衆の利用に供することができないときは，発明は，次の状況においてのみ開示されたものとみなす。 (a)微生物の培養体が出願前に寄託機関に寄託されていること (b)寄託機関及び培養体寄託番号が出願書類に記載されていること。この情報が出願の時点で未だ入手可能でない場合は，当該情報は，審査官の請求から2月以内に提出しなければならない。IP法第44条に基づく出願の公開は，当該情報の提出を待って行われる。及び (c)なされた出願が，微生物の特性に関して，出願人による入手が可能な関連情報を与えること - 特許庁
  • As I mentioned several times, I was a member of the Hashimoto Cabinet when Hokkaido Takushoku Bank and Yamaichi Securities failed in 1997 as a result of a financial crisis, and when Nippon Credit Bank and Long-Term Credit Bank of Japan failed in 1998. At that time, banks engaging in overseas business were required to have a minimum capital adequacy ratio of 8%, and banks focusing on domestic business were required to have a minimum capital adequacy ratio of 4%. Generally speaking, the higher capital adequacy ratio a bank has, the more sound it is. However, if it goes too far, a credit crunch will occur. During the financial crisis, two big department stores located in front of the railway station in my hometown of Kitakyushu failed-a loan buyback provision was also a factor behind this-, and thus, I learned first-hand about the soundness of banks and the impact on the real economy. I related my experiences like this to Ms. Lagarde and Mr. Noyer.
    何回も申し上げましたように、（私は、）1997年日本の金融危機で、北海道拓殖銀行、山一證券、その次の年は日債銀、（日本）長期信用銀行が破綻したときの橋本内閣の閣僚でございまして、本当に健全な強い銀行、言うなれば自己資本の高い銀行で海外業務をするときは8％、国内銀行は4％という基準が当時あったわけでございますが、自己資本比率の高い銀行ほど一般的に安全でございますけれども、そうなると貸し剥がし・貸し渋りというのが起こります。これは瑕疵担保条項のこともございましたが、金融危機のときに、私の地元の北九州市の駅前にある大きなデパートが2つほど破綻いたしまして、私は北九州市出身ですから、まさに銀行の健全性と実体経済の影響ということを、身をもって勉強したつもりでございます。そんなことも、この前ラガルドさんにも、またノワイエさんにも申し上げてきました。 - 金融庁
  • If the Controller is satisfied, on a claim made in the prescribed manner at any time before a patent is granted, that, by virtue of any assignment or agreement made by the applicant or one of the applicants, or by a decision under section 81, the claimant would, if the patent were then granted, be entitled thereto or to the interest of the applicant therein, or to an undivided share of the patent or of that interest, the Controller shall direct that the application shall proceed in the name of the claimant or in the names of the claimant and the applicant or each of the other such applicants, according as the case may require; provided that no such direction as aforesaid shall be given by virtue of any assignment or agreement made by one of two or more joint patent applicants except with the consent of the other joint applicant or each of the other such applicants.
    特許が付与される前は何時でも，所定の方法により作成されたクレームにより，出願人又はその他の各出願人が行う譲渡若しくは契約により，又は第81条に基づく裁定により，当該特許が付与されたならば，請求人が特許に対し又は特許出願人の権益に対し又は当該特許若しくは当該権益の未分割の持分に対して権原を有する筈であったことに長官が納得する場合は，長官は，その出願については，要求される場合に応じて，請求人の名称，又は当該請求人及び出願人の名称，又は当該他の各出願人の名称において，これを処理すべき旨を指示する。ただし，他の共同出願人又は他の出願人の各人が同意する場合を除き，2以上の共同特許出願人のうちの1が行う何らかの譲渡又は契約により，如何なる前記の命令も行ってはならないものとする。 - 特許庁
  • Article 2 (1) In the case where the Futures Commission Merchant Association prescribed in Article 54-3, paragraph (1) of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision by the Revising Act has been established at the time of the promulgation of the Revising Act, when said Futures Commission Merchant Association was approved to amend its articles of incorporation to become a commodity futures association under the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act revised by the Revising Act pursuant to the provisions of Article 8, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Revising Act, registration of dissolution shall be completed with regard to the Futures Commission Merchant Association and registration prescribed in Article 3 of the Association Registration Order (Cabinet Order No. 29 of 1964) shall be completed with regard to the commodity futures association, within two weeks from the day on which the approval for the amendment of articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 8, paragraph (4) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Revising Act becomes effective at the location of its principal office and within three weeks from such day at the location of its secondary offices.
    第二条　改正法の公布の際既に改正法による改正前の商品取引所法第五十四条の三第一項に規定する商品取引員協会が設立されている場合において、当該商品取引員協会が、改正法附則第八条第一項の規定により、改正法による改正後の商品取引所法の規定による商品先物取引協会となるための定款の変更の認可を受けたときは、同条第四項に規定する定款の変更の認可の効力が発生した日から主たる事務所の所在地においては二週間以内に、従たる事務所の所在地においては三週間以内に、商品取引員協会については解散の登記、商品先物取引協会については組合等登記令（昭和三十九年政令第二十九号）第三条に定める登記をしなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • While my predecessor was in office, a law called the SME Financing Facilitation Act (Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc.) was established. In Japan, 99.7% of all companies are small and medium-sized enterprises, or SMEs, which employ 28 million people. Now, faced with growing economic globalization, especially since the Lehman crisis two years ago, SMEs have been suffering considerably from hardships. At the same time, though, SMEs have the advantage of being flexible and resilient and, from the viewpoint, the FSA considers SMEs to be extremely important. My hometown is the city of Kitakyushu, where Yahata Steel Works, initially a government-owned company, was founded 100 years ago, and served as the base for the creation of a large number of SMEs there. Fukuoka Prefecture, also home to factories of Toyota and Nissan, is the second-largest car-producing prefecture after Aichi, which explains the large number of modest-size companies and SMEs there.
    それは前大臣のときに、中小企業金融円滑化法というのをつくりまして、そんなところで一生懸命中小企業に対する融資というのは、まあ、企業の99.7％、2,800万人の方が中小企業で従事しておられるわけですから、今こういった経済のグローバル化の中、ましてや2年前のリーマンショック以来、非常に中小企業というのはあえいでおりますし、しかし同時に中小企業は機動性あるいは弾力性といった利点もあるわけですから、そういった中で中小企業を金融庁は極めて大事だと思っておりますが、私はいつか話したと思いますが、私は地元に帰って、私は北九州市ですから中小企業、まあ官営八幡製鐵所が100年前にできまして、それをすそ野として福岡県はトヨタも日産も、愛知県に続いて2番目の自動車生産県でございますので、たくさんの中堅企業あるいは中小企業が多いわけです。 - 金融庁
  • According to what I have heard from the administrative staff, the Incubator Bank of Japan was inspected twice before the latest inspection for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, as I just mentioned: the previous inspection was for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 and the one before that was for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. My understanding is that as at the end of the fiscal year subject to each of the previous two inspections, the Bank’s financial position was assets in excess of liabilities according to the results of these inspections. Also, my understanding is that there were no material violations of laws and regulations, inadequacies in systems or other such problems in its business operations that would lead to administrative actions as found in the latest inspection. As I have repeatedly stated, at the time of the first inspection, the Bank engaged in operations allegedly based on a new business model targeted at small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The Lehman Brothers shockwave that struck at the time may have been one of the factors. That said, then-Chairman Takeshi Kimura is an extremely capable person, who, according to what I have been told, had an authoritarian management style, so I suspect overambitious business expansions gave rise to the present outcome.
    私は、事務方から聞いているところによりますと、日本振興銀行に対して、直近の21年3月期を基準日とする検査のほかに、過去、今さっき（申し上げた）ように19年３月期及び17年3月期を基準日とする前回及び前々回検査を実施しておりますが、上記検査の結果、同行は、前回及び前々回検査の検査基準日において、財務状況に関しては資産超過の状況にあったものと認識しておりますが、また業務運営に関しても、直近検査に認められたような行政処分につながる重大な法令違反や体制の不備等はなかったものと認識をしておりますが、私が何回も申しましたように、途中から無理な業容の拡大や経営陣による、率直に言えば無理な経営拡大を急ぎ過ぎたといいますか、最初は私も先週言いましたように、最初の1回目の検査のときには、非常に中小企業を対象とした新しいビジネスモデルだというようなことでやっておられたけれども、それからリーマン・ショックも重なったということもあるのかもしれませんけれども、非常に無理な業容の拡大を行い、当時の木村剛会長のもとで、非常にこの方は能力のある方で、しかし、悪く言えばワンマン経営だったというふうなことを漏れ聞いておりますけれども、業容拡大に非常に走ったということが、今日の結果を招いたのではないかなというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁
  • (7) In the case where the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider is the Transferor Company prescribed in Article 135, paragraph (3) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act, the term "the Transferor Company and the Transferee Company" in Article 136, paragraphs (1) and (3) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Transferee Company," the terms "directors (or, in a company with Committees, executive officers)," "for a period ranging from two weeks before the date of the Shareholders Meeting, etc. set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article," and "the Transfer Agreement concluded under Article 135, paragraph (1) and other" in Article 136-2, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "officers," "on the creation day of the contract pertaining to the contract set forth in Article 135, paragraph (1) (hereinafter defined as "Transfer Agreement")," and "the Transfer Agreement and other," respectively; the term "A shareholder or Policyholder of the Transferor Company" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "An Affected Policyholder,", and the term "the time of the adoption of the resolution under Article 136, paragraph (1)" in Article 138 of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the time of preparation of the Transfer Agreement."
    ７　特定少額短期保険業者が新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十五条第三項に規定する移転会社である場合においては、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十六条第一項及び第三項中「移転会社及び移転先会社」とあるのは「移転先会社」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十六条の二第一項中「取締役（委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役）」とあるのは「役員」と、「前条第一項の株主総会等の会日の二週間前」とあるのは「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書（以下この節において「移転契約書」という。）の作成日」と、「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書その他の」とあるのは「移転契約書その他の」と、同条第二項中「移転会社の株主又は保険契約者」とあるのは「移転対象契約者」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十八条中「第百三十六条第一項の決議があった時」とあるのは「移転契約書を作成した時」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well.
    それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7％は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。 - 金融庁
  • (1) A trademark or application therefor may belong pro indiviso to two or more persons. The resulting common property shall be governed by the terms of agreement between the parties, failing that by the provisions of this section and, in the final instance, by the provisions of common law on common ownership of property. The granting of licenses and the independent use of the trademark by each participant shall be agreed in accordance with Article 398 of the Civil Code. Each participant may by his own means take civil and criminal action to protect a trademark but shall make appropriate notification to the other joint owners so that they may be party to such action and contribute to the payment of the expenses incurred. In the case of transfer of a trademark or a share, a participant may exercise his right of prior purchase within a period of one month from the time when he was notified of the purpose of and conditions for the implementation of the transfer. Where prior notification is not given or if a transfer is made in a manner different from that provided for in such notification, a participant may exercise his right to withhold his share, within the same period, from the time of publication of the recording of the transfer in the Register of Trademarks. Such absolute and unjustified opposition of a participant to the use of a trademark as might cause the trademark to be declared lapsed shall be deemed, for all purposes, to constitute renunciation of his right.
    (1) 商標又はその出願は，2以上の者に共通して帰属することができる。結果としての共通財産は，当事者間の契約条件により，また当該契約が存在しない場合は本項の規定に従い，かつ最終的には財産の共通所有に関するコモンローの規定に従い，管理される。各参加者による商標のライセンス付与及び個別使用は，民法第398条に従い合意されるものとする。各参加者は独自の手段によって，商標を保護するための民事訴訟及び刑事訴訟を提起することができるが，他の共同所有者に適切な通知を行って，それらの者が当該訴訟の当事者となり，被った費用の支払に寄与することができるようにする。商標又は持分の譲渡の場合は，参加者は，当該譲渡の目的及び実施条件について通知されたときから1月以内に自己の先買権を行使することができる。事前通知が行われなかった場合又は譲渡が当該通知に定めるものとは異なる態様で行われた場合は，参加者は，商標登録簿への譲渡の記録の公告時点から同一期間内に，自己の持分を保留する権利を行使することができる。ある参加者が商標の使用に対して，当該商標の失効宣言に至りかねない程絶対的かつ不当に異議を申し立てた場合は，すべての目的について自己の権利を放棄したとみなされる。 - 特許庁
  • Article 210 (1) The provisions of Chapter VII, Section 1 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the comprehensive transfer of insurance contracts in Japan by a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. In this case, the term "creditors" in Article 135, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "creditors of branch offices, etc. set forth in Article 185, paragraph (1);" the term "Transferor Company and the Transferee Company" in Article 136, paragraphs (1) and (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Transferee Company;" the terms "two weeks before the date of the Shareholders Meeting, etc. set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article," "written agreement concluded under Article 135, paragraph (1)" and "business offices or offices" in Article 136-2, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the date of preparation of the written agreement concluded under Article 135, paragraph (1) (hereinafter referred to as "Transfer Agreement" in this Section)," "Transfer Agreement" and "branch offices, etc.," respectively; the term "shareholder or Policyholder of the Transferor Company" in Article 136-2, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "affected Policyholder;" the term "resolution set forth in Article 136, paragraph (1)" in Article 137, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "preparation of the Transfer Agreement;" the terms "the time of the adoption of resolution under Article 136, paragraph (1)" and "shall not conclude" in Article 138 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the time of preparation of the Transfer Agreement" and "shall not conclude in Japan," respectively; and the term "creditors" in Article 139, paragraph (2), item (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "creditors of branch offices, etc. set forth in Article 185, paragraph (1)."
    第二百十条　第七章第一節の規定は、外国保険会社等の日本における保険契約の移転について準用する。この場合において、第百三十五条第三項中「債権者」とあるのは「第百八十五条第一項に規定する支店等に係る債権者」と、第百三十六条第一項及び第三項中「移転会社及び移転先会社」とあるのは「移転先会社」と、第百三十六条の二第一項中「前条第一項の株主総会等の会日の二週間前」とあるのは「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書（以下この節において「移転契約書」という。）の作成日」と、「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書」とあるのは「移転契約書」と、「各営業所又は各事務所」とあるのは「支店等」と、同条第二項中「移転会社の株主又は保険契約者」とあるのは「移転対象契約者」と、第百三十七条第一項中「第百三十六条第一項の決議」とあるのは「移転契約書の作成」と、第百三十八条中「第百三十六条第一項の決議があった時」とあるのは「移転契約書を作成した時」と、「締結してはならない」とあるのは「日本において締結してはならない」と、第百三十九条第二項第三号中「債権者」とあるのは「第百八十五条第一項に規定する支店等に係る債権者」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • I made a comment at the informal ministerial gathering today, which was obviously not a comment from the head of the administration, but I am Vice-Chief of the People's New Party (PNP), and the current government is, as you know, a coalition of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) and the PNP. Accordingly, Prime Minister Kan, right after he assumed office, met with (PNP) Chief Shizuka Kamei to discuss how the two parties would cooperate in policymaking, at which meeting I was also present as the PNP Secretary-General at that time. Under the three-party coalition that preceded the current one, there was a committee called the Ministerial Committee on Basic Policies, which was set up as a forum for the parties to coordinate or match their policies, but then the Social Democratic Party left the coalition. That is why how the remaining parties should cooperate in policymaking afterwards was a subject of discussion at the party leader meeting right after Prime Minister Kan became the new Prime Minister, during which both leaders agreed to go about it properly. Then as it turned out, as you know, we had a House of Councilors election and the same subject also just came up again during the recent meeting of the two party leaders, who supposedly agreed to "do it (policy cooperation)." That is why I decided to make an elaborate comment on this subject to Prime Minister Kan at today's informal ministerial gathering, to which Prime Minister Kan responded by telling Mr. Gemba, who is a state minister and is also DPJ's Policy Research Committee Chair, to work on policy cooperation with the PNP in the proper way - therefore, Policy Research Committee Chair Gemba and I proceeded to discuss how it should be done, a task that I presume will basically be handled mainly by policy research committee chairs.
    今日、閣僚懇で、私はこれは行政の長としての発言ではございませんけれども、国民新党の副代表でもございますし、両党、民主党と国民新党のご存じのように連立内閣でございますから、両党間の政策協議をどうするのかということは、実は菅総理がなられた後、すぐ亀井静香（国民新党）代表と話をされまして、当時私は幹事長でございましたから、同席をいたしまして、前の3党連立内閣のときは、基本政策閣僚委員会というのがございまして、ここで政策を整合性を図る、あるいはすり合わせをするということでございましたが、社民党さんが連立を離脱されましたので、その後の政策協力をどうするかということが当時菅総理が実現した後のすぐの党首会談でのテーマで、しっかりやりましょうという話でございましたが、ご存じのように参議院選挙になりましたので、またこの前も両党首会談でそのことが議題になって、「（政策協力を）やろう」ということでございましたから、今日閣僚懇で菅総理に相当申し上げまして、ちょうど玄葉さんが民主党の国務大臣兼政調会長でございますから、菅総理からもきちっと国民新党のほうとの政策協議をするようにということでございまして、玄葉政調会長と私ともどういうふうにするのかと、基本的に政調会長中心だというふうに思いますけれども、そのことを打ち合わせをさせていただいたわけでございます。 - 金融庁
  • I spoke with FRB (Federal Reserve Board) Chairman Bernanke two weeks ago and also had a chance to speak with People's Bank of China Governor Zhou Xiaochuan this week. Frankly speaking, this is, as a matter of fact, a kind of issue to be decided on by the global forum of the G20, as it relates to stability of financial institutions worldwide and, at the same time, the definition of capital adequacy, and the quality and quantity debate, among other things. A dozen years or so ago, Japan was hit by a financial crisis. When I was previously a minister, I witnessed something similar – the failure of the Hokkaido Takushoku Bank – which resulted in a credit crunch and credit withdrawal that, as many of you must remember, indeed caused a large number of companies to go under one after another. In that sense, it is not necessarily a positive thing to make a capital adequacy ratio higher and higher.
    私は先々週でございますか、バーナンキＦＲＢ（連邦準備制度理事会）議長ともお話ししましたし、先週というか今週は周小川、中国の中央銀行の総裁とも話をさせていただきましたけれども、率直に言えば、こういった話も当然、非常に世界的なＧ20で決める話でございまして、非常に世界の金融機関の安定性と、それから同時に自己資本の定義、あるいは定義と申しますか、自己資本の定義、それから質と量、こういったことがまた同時に、皆様方ご存じのように十数年前、日本は大変金融ショックといいますか、金融危機に襲われまして、当時、私も与党の国会議員で閣僚をやめたすぐ後で、閣僚のときにも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産したということが起きましたので、本当にあのとき貸し渋り、貸しはがしになりまして、非常に皆さん方もご記憶のある方が多いと思いますが、本当にばたばた企業も倒産いたしまして、そういった意味で、要するに、自己資本の比率が高ければ高いほどいいというものでもございません。 - 金融庁
  • If a person sells, or exposes for sale, or has in his possession for sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacturer any goods or things to which a false trademark or a false trade description is applied or which, being required under section 108 to have applied to them an indication of the country or place in which they were made or produced or the name and address of the manufacturer or producer or the person for whom the goods are manufactured or produced are without the indication so require, he shall, unless the proves (a) that, having taken all reasonable precautions against committing an offence against this section, he had at the time of the commission of the alleged offence no reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark or trade description or that any offence had been committed in respect of the goods; and (b) that, on demand by or on behalf of the prosecutor he gave all the information in his power with respect to the person from whom he obtained such goods or things; or (c) that otherwise he acted innocently, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 2 (two) years, or with fine, or with both, and in case of a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 3 (three) years, or with fine, or with both.
    不正な商標若しくは虚偽の商品表示を付して、又は、第108条の規定により付すことが求められる製造若しくは生産される国若しくは地域、又は製造者若しくは生産者又は商品がその者のために製造若しくは生産される者の名称及び住所を表示することなく、商品又は物品を販売する者、又は販売用の展示を行う者、又は販売目的、取引若しくは製造の目的で所持する者は、次に掲げる事項が証明されない限り、2年以下の禁固又は罰金若しくはこれを併科、再犯若しくは累犯はいずれの場合も3年以下の禁固又は罰金若しくはこれを併科する。(a)本条に定める侵害に対して合理的なすべての予防措置を講じており、侵害があったとされる時点で、当該商標若しくは商品表示の真実性を疑う、又は当該商品に関して何らかの違反があったことを疑う、どのような理由もなかったこと。(b)検察官の要求に応じて、又は検察官のために、当該商品又は物品の入手先である者について自己の権限が及ぶ限りすべての情報を提供したこと。(c)その他の点においても正直に行動したこと。 - 特許庁
  • Article 49 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding paragraph (2), items (i) and (ii)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 (Omission of Calling Procedures), Article 311 (Voting in Writing), Article 312 (Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment) and Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "shareholder" in those provisions (excluding Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding items), Article 298, paragraph (4), Article 311, paragraph (4), Article 312, paragraph (5), Article 314 and Article 318, paragraph (4)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" and "shareholder" in Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding the items) and Article 298, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "member or general representative," respectively; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "shareholders" in Article 311, paragraph (4) and Article 312, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the terms "by the shareholders" and "common interest of the shareholders" in Article 314 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "by the general representatives" and "common interest of the general representatives," respectively; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "shareholders" in Article 318, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第四十九条　会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条（招集手続の省略）、第三百十一条（書面による議決権の行使）、第三百十二条（電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）及び第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は、相互会社の総代会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、これらの規定（同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項、第三百十一条第四項、第三百十二条第五項、第三百十四条並びに第三百十八条第四項を除く。）中「株主」とあるのは「総代」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時総代会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百十一条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十四条中「株主から」とあるのは「総代から」と、「株主の共同」とあるのは「社員の共同」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同条第四項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
＜前へ 1 2 .... 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 次へ＞

例文データの著作権について