「Two-Time」を含む例文一覧(7021)
＜前へ 1 2 .... 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141- (1) A trademark or application therefor may belong pro indiviso to two or more persons. The resulting common property shall be governed by the terms of agreement between the parties, failing that by the provisions of this section and, in the final instance, by the provisions of common law on common ownership of property. The granting of licenses and the independent use of the trademark by each participant shall be agreed in accordance with Article 398 of the Civil Code. Each participant may by his own means take civil and criminal action to protect a trademark but shall make appropriate notification to the other joint owners so that they may be party to such action and contribute to the payment of the expenses incurred. In the case of transfer of a trademark or a share, a participant may exercise his right of prior purchase within a period of one month from the time when he was notified of the purpose of and conditions for the implementation of the transfer. Where prior notification is not given or if a transfer is made in a manner different from that provided for in such notification, a participant may exercise his right to withhold his share, within the same period, from the time of publication of the recording of the transfer in the Register of Trademarks. Such absolute and unjustified opposition of a participant to the use of a trademark as might cause the trademark to be declared lapsed shall be deemed, for all purposes, to constitute renunciation of his right.
(1) 商標又はその出願は，2以上の者に共通して帰属することができる。結果としての共通財産は，当事者間の契約条件により，また当該契約が存在しない場合は本項の規定に従い，かつ最終的には財産の共通所有に関するコモンローの規定に従い，管理される。各参加者による商標のライセンス付与及び個別使用は，民法第398条に従い合意されるものとする。各参加者は独自の手段によって，商標を保護するための民事訴訟及び刑事訴訟を提起することができるが，他の共同所有者に適切な通知を行って，それらの者が当該訴訟の当事者となり，被った費用の支払に寄与することができるようにする。商標又は持分の譲渡の場合は，参加者は，当該譲渡の目的及び実施条件について通知されたときから1月以内に自己の先買権を行使することができる。事前通知が行われなかった場合又は譲渡が当該通知に定めるものとは異なる態様で行われた場合は，参加者は，商標登録簿への譲渡の記録の公告時点から同一期間内に，自己の持分を保留する権利を行使することができる。ある参加者が商標の使用に対して，当該商標の失効宣言に至りかねない程絶対的かつ不当に異議を申し立てた場合は，すべての目的について自己の権利を放棄したとみなされる。 - 特許庁 - Article 210 (1) The provisions of Chapter VII, Section 1 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the comprehensive transfer of insurance contracts in Japan by a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. In this case, the term "creditors" in Article 135, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "creditors of branch offices, etc. set forth in Article 185, paragraph (1);" the term "Transferor Company and the Transferee Company" in Article 136, paragraphs (1) and (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Transferee Company;" the terms "two weeks before the date of the Shareholders Meeting, etc. set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article," "written agreement concluded under Article 135, paragraph (1)" and "business offices or offices" in Article 136-2, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the date of preparation of the written agreement concluded under Article 135, paragraph (1) (hereinafter referred to as "Transfer Agreement" in this Section)," "Transfer Agreement" and "branch offices, etc.," respectively; the term "shareholder or Policyholder of the Transferor Company" in Article 136-2, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "affected Policyholder;" the term "resolution set forth in Article 136, paragraph (1)" in Article 137, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "preparation of the Transfer Agreement;" the terms "the time of the adoption of resolution under Article 136, paragraph (1)" and "shall not conclude" in Article 138 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the time of preparation of the Transfer Agreement" and "shall not conclude in Japan," respectively; and the term "creditors" in Article 139, paragraph (2), item (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "creditors of branch offices, etc. set forth in Article 185, paragraph (1)."
第二百十条 第七章第一節の規定は、外国保険会社等の日本における保険契約の移転について準用する。この場合において、第百三十五条第三項中「債権者」とあるのは「第百八十五条第一項に規定する支店等に係る債権者」と、第百三十六条第一項及び第三項中「移転会社及び移転先会社」とあるのは「移転先会社」と、第百三十六条の二第一項中「前条第一項の株主総会等の会日の二週間前」とあるのは「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書（以下この節において「移転契約書」という。）の作成日」と、「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書」とあるのは「移転契約書」と、「各営業所又は各事務所」とあるのは「支店等」と、同条第二項中「移転会社の株主又は保険契約者」とあるのは「移転対象契約者」と、第百三十七条第一項中「第百三十六条第一項の決議」とあるのは「移転契約書の作成」と、第百三十八条中「第百三十六条第一項の決議があった時」とあるのは「移転契約書を作成した時」と、「締結してはならない」とあるのは「日本において締結してはならない」と、第百三十九条第二項第三号中「債権者」とあるのは「第百八十五条第一項に規定する支店等に係る債権者」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - I made a comment at the informal ministerial gathering today, which was obviously not a comment from the head of the administration, but I am Vice-Chief of the People's New Party (PNP), and the current government is, as you know, a coalition of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) and the PNP. Accordingly, Prime Minister Kan, right after he assumed office, met with (PNP) Chief Shizuka Kamei to discuss how the two parties would cooperate in policymaking, at which meeting I was also present as the PNP Secretary-General at that time. Under the three-party coalition that preceded the current one, there was a committee called the Ministerial Committee on Basic Policies, which was set up as a forum for the parties to coordinate or match their policies, but then the Social Democratic Party left the coalition. That is why how the remaining parties should cooperate in policymaking afterwards was a subject of discussion at the party leader meeting right after Prime Minister Kan became the new Prime Minister, during which both leaders agreed to go about it properly. Then as it turned out, as you know, we had a House of Councilors election and the same subject also just came up again during the recent meeting of the two party leaders, who supposedly agreed to "do it (policy cooperation)." That is why I decided to make an elaborate comment on this subject to Prime Minister Kan at today's informal ministerial gathering, to which Prime Minister Kan responded by telling Mr. Gemba, who is a state minister and is also DPJ's Policy Research Committee Chair, to work on policy cooperation with the PNP in the proper way - therefore, Policy Research Committee Chair Gemba and I proceeded to discuss how it should be done, a task that I presume will basically be handled mainly by policy research committee chairs.
今日、閣僚懇で、私はこれは行政の長としての発言ではございませんけれども、国民新党の副代表でもございますし、両党、民主党と国民新党のご存じのように連立内閣でございますから、両党間の政策協議をどうするのかということは、実は菅総理がなられた後、すぐ亀井静香（国民新党）代表と話をされまして、当時私は幹事長でございましたから、同席をいたしまして、前の3党連立内閣のときは、基本政策閣僚委員会というのがございまして、ここで政策を整合性を図る、あるいはすり合わせをするということでございましたが、社民党さんが連立を離脱されましたので、その後の政策協力をどうするかということが当時菅総理が実現した後のすぐの党首会談でのテーマで、しっかりやりましょうという話でございましたが、ご存じのように参議院選挙になりましたので、またこの前も両党首会談でそのことが議題になって、「（政策協力を）やろう」ということでございましたから、今日閣僚懇で菅総理に相当申し上げまして、ちょうど玄葉さんが民主党の国務大臣兼政調会長でございますから、菅総理からもきちっと国民新党のほうとの政策協議をするようにということでございまして、玄葉政調会長と私ともどういうふうにするのかと、基本的に政調会長中心だというふうに思いますけれども、そのことを打ち合わせをさせていただいたわけでございます。 - 金融庁 - I spoke with FRB (Federal Reserve Board) Chairman Bernanke two weeks ago and also had a chance to speak with People's Bank of China Governor Zhou Xiaochuan this week. Frankly speaking, this is, as a matter of fact, a kind of issue to be decided on by the global forum of the G20, as it relates to stability of financial institutions worldwide and, at the same time, the definition of capital adequacy, and the quality and quantity debate, among other things. A dozen years or so ago, Japan was hit by a financial crisis. When I was previously a minister, I witnessed something similar – the failure of the Hokkaido Takushoku Bank – which resulted in a credit crunch and credit withdrawal that, as many of you must remember, indeed caused a large number of companies to go under one after another. In that sense, it is not necessarily a positive thing to make a capital adequacy ratio higher and higher.
私は先々週でございますか、バーナンキＦＲＢ（連邦準備制度理事会）議長ともお話ししましたし、先週というか今週は周小川、中国の中央銀行の総裁とも話をさせていただきましたけれども、率直に言えば、こういった話も当然、非常に世界的なＧ20で決める話でございまして、非常に世界の金融機関の安定性と、それから同時に自己資本の定義、あるいは定義と申しますか、自己資本の定義、それから質と量、こういったことがまた同時に、皆様方ご存じのように十数年前、日本は大変金融ショックといいますか、金融危機に襲われまして、当時、私も与党の国会議員で閣僚をやめたすぐ後で、閣僚のときにも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産したということが起きましたので、本当にあのとき貸し渋り、貸しはがしになりまして、非常に皆さん方もご記憶のある方が多いと思いますが、本当にばたばた企業も倒産いたしまして、そういった意味で、要するに、自己資本の比率が高ければ高いほどいいというものでもございません。 - 金融庁 - If a person sells, or exposes for sale, or has in his possession for sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacturer any goods or things to which a false trademark or a false trade description is applied or which, being required under section 108 to have applied to them an indication of the country or place in which they were made or produced or the name and address of the manufacturer or producer or the person for whom the goods are manufactured or produced are without the indication so require, he shall, unless the proves (a) that, having taken all reasonable precautions against committing an offence against this section, he had at the time of the commission of the alleged offence no reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark or trade description or that any offence had been committed in respect of the goods; and (b) that, on demand by or on behalf of the prosecutor he gave all the information in his power with respect to the person from whom he obtained such goods or things; or (c) that otherwise he acted innocently, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 2 (two) years, or with fine, or with both, and in case of a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 3 (three) years, or with fine, or with both.
不正な商標若しくは虚偽の商品表示を付して、又は、第108条の規定により付すことが求められる製造若しくは生産される国若しくは地域、又は製造者若しくは生産者又は商品がその者のために製造若しくは生産される者の名称及び住所を表示することなく、商品又は物品を販売する者、又は販売用の展示を行う者、又は販売目的、取引若しくは製造の目的で所持する者は、次に掲げる事項が証明されない限り、2年以下の禁固又は罰金若しくはこれを併科、再犯若しくは累犯はいずれの場合も3年以下の禁固又は罰金若しくはこれを併科する。(a)本条に定める侵害に対して合理的なすべての予防措置を講じており、侵害があったとされる時点で、当該商標若しくは商品表示の真実性を疑う、又は当該商品に関して何らかの違反があったことを疑う、どのような理由もなかったこと。(b)検察官の要求に応じて、又は検察官のために、当該商品又は物品の入手先である者について自己の権限が及ぶ限りすべての情報を提供したこと。(c)その他の点においても正直に行動したこと。 - 特許庁 - Article 49 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding paragraph (2), items (i) and (ii)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 (Omission of Calling Procedures), Article 311 (Voting in Writing), Article 312 (Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment) and Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "shareholder" in those provisions (excluding Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding items), Article 298, paragraph (4), Article 311, paragraph (4), Article 312, paragraph (5), Article 314 and Article 318, paragraph (4)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" and "shareholder" in Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding the items) and Article 298, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "member or general representative," respectively; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "shareholders" in Article 311, paragraph (4) and Article 312, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the terms "by the shareholders" and "common interest of the shareholders" in Article 314 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "by the general representatives" and "common interest of the general representatives," respectively; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "shareholders" in Article 318, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
第四十九条 会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条（招集手続の省略）、第三百十一条（書面による議決権の行使）、第三百十二条（電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）及び第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は、相互会社の総代会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、これらの規定（同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項、第三百十一条第四項、第三百十二条第五項、第三百十四条並びに第三百十八条第四項を除く。）中「株主」とあるのは「総代」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時総代会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百十一条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十四条中「株主から」とあるのは「総代から」と、「株主の共同」とあるのは「社員の共同」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同条第四項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (7) When the Specified Insurer who continuously carries on the specified insurance business executes transfer of the insurance contract pursuant to the provision of Article 2, paragraph (1) or (4) of the Supplementary Provisions, such Specified Insurer shall be deemed as a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, the provisions of Part II, Chapter VII, Section 1 of the New Insurance Business Act (including the penal provisions pertaining thereto) shall be applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act. In this case, the term "Transferor Company and Transferee Company" in Article 136, paragraphs (1) and (3) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 272-29 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Transferee Company," the terms "The directors (or in a company with Committees, executive officers)" and "two weeks before of the date of Shareholders Meeting, etc. set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 136-2, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the officers (including representative persons or administrators of an association or foundation that is not a juridical person)" and "the date of preparation of the Transfer Agreement concluded under Article 135, paragraph (1) (hereinafter referred to as "Transfer Agreement" in this Section)," respectively; the term "the Transfer Agreement concluded under Article 135, paragraph (1) and other" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Transfer Agreement and other," the term "A shareholder or Policyholder of the Transferor Company" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Affected Policyholders," the term "the time of the adoption of the resolution under Article 136, paragraph (1)" in Article 138 of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the time of the creation of Transfer Agreement," the term "the incorporator, the director at the incorporation, the executive officer at the incorporation, the company auditor at the incorporation, the director, the executive officer, the accounting advisor or the member who is supposed to carry out such duties and the company auditor" in Article 333, paragraph (1) in the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the officer"; any technical change in interpretation required shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
７ 附則第二条第一項又は第四項の規定により引き続き特定保険業を行う特定保険業者が保険契約の移転を行う場合においては、当該特定保険業者を少額短期保険業者とみなして、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第二編第七章第一節の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同条において準用する新保険業法第百三十六条第一項及び第三項中「移転会社及び移転先会社」とあるのは「移転先会社」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十六条の二第一項中「取締役（委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役）」とあるのは「役員（法人でない社団又は財団の代表者又は管理人を含む。）」と、「前条第一項の株主総会等の会日の二週間前」とあるのは「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書（以下この節において「移転契約書」という。）の作成日」と、「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書その他の」とあるのは「移転契約書その他の」と、同条第二項中「移転会社の株主又は保険契約者」とあるのは「移転対象契約者」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十八条中「第百三十六条第一項の決議があった時」とあるのは「移転契約書を作成した時」と、新保険業法第三百三十三条第一項中「発起人、設立時取締役、設立時執行役、設立時監査役、取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役」とあるのは「発起人、役員（法人でない社団又は財団の代表者又は管理人を含む。）」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (8) The Transferred Juridical Person who manage the business and property pertaining to the insurance contract underwritten before the day of the Transfer Register pursuant to the provision of paragraph (5) shall be deemed as the Specified Insurer who continuously carries on the specified insurance business pursuant to the provisions of Article 2, paragraph (1) or (4) of the Supplementary Provisions, and the provisions of Article 3 of the Supplementary Provisions (excluding paragraph (2)), the preceding Article (limited to paragraphs (7) to (12) and (14)), following Article (limited to paragraphs (2) and (5).), and Articles 8 and 16 of the Supplementary Provisions shall be applied. In this case, the term "by the day when six months have passed since the Effective Date (or, if the underwriting of the insurance is performed for the first time after the Effective Date, the date of such underwriting; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article.)" in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "after the day on which the Transfer Register provided in Article 5, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions was registered without delay" and the term ": provided, however, that this shall not apply to a person who applies for the license set forth in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act or for the registration set forth in Article 272, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act by the day on which such six months have passed" in the Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "by the day when two years have passed since the Effective Date" in paragraph (2) of the following Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "it shall be applied pursuant to the provision of paragraph (8) of the preceding Article by the day when six years have passed since the Effective Date of the Revision Act," the term "five years have passed since the Effective Date" in paragraph (8) of the preceding Article, Article 8, paragraph (2) and Article 16, paragraph (18) of the Supplementary Provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "eight years have passed since the Effective Date of the Revision Act," the term "by the day when two years have passed since the Effective Date" in Article 8, paragraph (2) and Article 16, paragraphs (1), (17) and (18) of the Supplementary Provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "it shall be applied pursuant to the provisions of Article 5, paragraph (8) of the Supplementary Provisions by the day when six years have passed since the Effective Date of the Revision Act," and the term "seven years have passed since the Effective Date" in Article 16, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "ten years have passed since the Effective Date of the Revision Act"; any technical change in interpretation required shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
８ 第五項の規定により移行登記をした日前に引き受けた保険契約に係る業務及び財産の管理を行う移行法人は、附則第二条第一項又は第四項の規定により引き続き特定保険業を行う特定保険業者とみなして、附則第三条（第二項を除く。）、前条（第七項から第十二項まで及び第十四項に限る。）、次条（第二項及び第五項に限る。）並びに附則第八条及び第十六条の規定を適用する。この場合において、附則第三条第一項中「施行日から起算して六月を経過する日（同日後に施行日後初めて保険の引受けを行う場合には、当該引受けを行う日。以下この項において同じ。）までに」とあるのは「附則第五条第一項に規定する移行登記をした日以後遅滞なく」と、「しなければならない。ただし、当該六月を経過する日までに新保険業法第三条第一項の免許又は新保険業法第二百七十二条第一項の登録の申請をした者については、この限りでない」とあるのは「しなければならない」と、次条第二項中「施行日から起算して二年を経過する日までの間に」とあるのは「整備法の施行の日から起算して六年を経過する日までの間に前条第八項の規定により適用する」と、同項並びに附則第八条第二項及び第十六条第十八項中「施行日から起算して五年」とあるのは「整備法の施行の日から起算して八年」と、附則第八条第二項並びに第十六条第一項、第十七項及び第十八項中「施行日から起算して二年を経過する日までの間に」とあるのは「整備法の施行の日から起算して六年を経過する日までの間に附則第五条第八項の規定により適用する」と、同条第一項中「施行日から起算して七年」とあるのは「整備法の施行の日から起算して十年」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - They must satisfy the following conditions: they must be Belgian and must be resident in Belgium; they must be at least 25 years old; they must not be prohibited or placed under guardianship; they must neither be in a state of prohibition within the meaning of Articles 31 to 34 of the Penal Code nor have been convicted in Belgium or abroad of any of the offenses specified in Royal Decree No. 22 of October 24, 1934, prohibiting certain convicted persons and bankrupts from exercising certain offices, professions or activities and giving the commercial courts authority to pronounce on such prohibitions, as amended by the Laws of March 14, 1962, March 16, 1972, and August 4, 1978; they must hold a Belgian diploma of university education or a Belgian diploma of higher education of the long type issued after at least four years of study in a scientific, technical or legal discipline; Diplomas issued abroad after at least four years of study, in the same disciplines, shall be authorized subject to their equivalence having been recognized beforehand by the relevant Belgian authorities; they must have exercised an activity in the field of patents for a period of time and subject to conditions laid down by the King; they must have passed an examination before the Commission referred to in Article 61 on the subject of industrial property, principally as regards patents, within two years at the latest of terminating the activities referred to in of this paragraph.
これらの者は次に掲げる条件を満たしていなければならない。ベルギー人であり，ベルギーの居住者でなければならない。少なくとも年齢25歳以上でなければならない。禁止され又は保護の下にある者であってはならない。刑法第31条から第34条までの意味における禁止状態にあってはならず，また，有罪判決を受けた者及び破産者のうちの一定の者に対し，一定の職務，職業又は活動に従事することを禁じており，また，商業裁判所に当該禁止を宣告する権限を付与している1962年3月14日法律，1972年3月16日法律及び1978年8月4日法律で改正された1934年10月24日勅令第22号に規定されている犯罪について，ベルギー又は外国で有罪の判決を受けた者であってはならない。ベルギーの大学卒業証書又は少なくとも4年間，科学，技術若しくは法律を研究した後に交付されるベルギーの長期型高等教育の卒業証書を保有していなければならない。上記と同一の学科を最低4年間研究した後に外国で発行された卒業証書は，予めベルギーの関連機関によってその同等性が承認されていることを条件として，許可されるものとする。国王の定める期間及び条件の下で，特許の分野の活動に従事していなければならない。(6)にいう活動の終了後遅くとも2年以内に，工業所有権の科目，主として特許に関して，第61条に述べる委員会の試験を合格していなければならない。 - 特許庁 - Article 49 (1) With regard to those Agreements, contracts and other concerted activities (hereinafter referred to as "Concerted Activities" in this Article) listed in the items of Article 12-3 of the Former Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 19 of the Act on Foreign Insurance Business Operators to be repealed under Article 2 of the Supplementary Provisions (hereinafter referred to as the "Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act")) which have been entered into by the time when this Act enters into force by those Insurance Companies Licensed under the Former Act which shall be deemed to have obtained the non-life insurance business license set forth in Article 3, paragraph (5) of the Current Act pursuant to the provision of Article 3 of the Supplementary Provisions and those foreign insurance business operators prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Former Foreign Insurance Operators Act (hereinafter referred to as "Non-Life Insurance Companies, etc. Licensed under the Former Act" in this Article) which shall be deemed to have obtained the foreign non-life insurance business license set forth in Article 185, paragraph (5) of the Current Act pursuant to the provision of Article 72 of the Supplementary Provisions, with other Non-Life Insurance Companies, etc. Licensed under the Former Act, the provisions of Article 12-3 to 12-7 inclusive of the Former Act (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 19 of the Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act) (including the penal provisions pertaining thereto) shall remain in force for a period of two years counting from the Effective Date, provided that all of the Non-Life Insurance Companies, etc. Licensed under the Former Act involved in the Concerted Activities have notified the Minister of Finance pursuant to the provisions of the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance within three months from the Effective Date.
第四十九条 附則第三条の規定により新法第三条第五項の損害保険業免許を受けたものとみなされる旧法の免許を受けた保険会社及び附則第七十二条の規定により新法第百八十五条第五項の外国損害保険業免許を受けたものとみなされる附則第二条の規定による廃止前の外国保険事業者に関する法律（以下「旧外国保険事業者法」という。）第二条第一項に規定する外国保険事業者（以下この条において「旧法の免許を受けた損害保険会社等」という。）がこの法律の施行の際現に他の旧法の免許を受けた損害保険会社等と行っている旧法第十二条ノ三各号（旧外国保険事業者法第十九条において準用する場合を含む。）に掲げる協定、契約その他の共同行為（以下この条において「共同行為」という。）については、当該共同行為に係るすべての旧法の免許を受けた損害保険会社等が施行日から起算して三月以内に大蔵省令で定めるところにより大蔵大臣に届出をした場合に限り、施行日から起算して二年を経過する日までの間は、旧法第十二条ノ三から第十二条ノ七まで（旧外国保険事業者法第十九条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）は、なおその効力を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Two policemen testified that about eight o'clock on the night of Thursday they had noticed the prisoner slip into the gate of Nina San Croix's residence and go down to the side of the house, where he was admitted; that his appearance and seeming haste had attracted their attention; that they had concluded that it was some clandestine amour, and out of curiosity had both slipped down to the house and endeavored to find a position from which they could see into the room, but were unable to do so, and were about to go back to the street when they heard a woman's voice cry out in, great anger: "I know that you love her and that you want to get rid of me, but you shall not do it! You murdered him, but you shall not murder me! I have all the evidence to convict you of murdering him! The Archbishop will have it to- morrow! They shall hang you! Do you hear me? They shall hang you for this murder!" that thereupon one of the policemen proposed that they should break into the house and see what was wrong, but the other had urged that it was only the usual lovers' quarrel and if they should interfere they would find nothing upon which a charge could be based and would only be laughed at by the chief; that they had waited and listened for a time, but hearing nothing further had gone back to the street and contented themselves with keeping a strict watch on the house.
警官二人は次のように証言した。木曜日夜八時くらいに、ニーナ・サン・クロワの住居に被告人がやってきて、入り口から家の横手まで侵入し、家に招き入れられたのを見かけた。その外見やそわそわした挙動から、これは怪しいと思った。その時は、被告人が女主人の秘密の愛人なんだろうと思い、好奇心も手伝って、自分たちが屋敷に入り、なんとか部屋の中を見れるよう努力した。しかし中を見ることはできず、大通りに戻ろうとしたところ、女主人が大声で誰かをののしっている声が聞こえてきた。「あの女が好きだって事、私をのけ者にしたいんだって事は分かってるわ。でもね、言うとおりにしてもらいますから！ あなたは私の夫を殺した！ でも、私は殺されるいわれはないわ！ 夫殺しの証拠はすべてそろっているのよ。大司教様には明日お見せします。あなたは縛り首間違いなしよ！ いいこと？ 夫殺しは縛り首よ！」これを聞いた警官の一人は、家の中に踏み込んでなにが起こっているのか確かめなければならないと同僚に言った。だが、もう一人は単なる痴話喧嘩にすぎんと言い、もし踏み込んだとしても逮捕できるような事はなにも発見できない、署長に笑われるのがオチだと主張した。二人はしばらくその場所にとどまって耳を澄ましていたが、もうなにも聞こえてはこなかった。それで大通りに戻り、屋敷を厳重に見張ることにした。 - Melville Davisson Post『罪体』 - Article 41 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding the proviso to paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding items of paragraph (2)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 to 302 inclusive (Omission of Calling Procedures, Giving of Reference Documents for Shareholders Meeting and Voting Forms), Article 310 to 312 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes), Article 319 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Omission of Resolution of Shareholders Meetings) and Article 320 (Omission of Reports to Shareholders Meetings) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting of members"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3), and the term "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" in Article 298, paragraphs (1) and (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38, paragraph (2) and Article 50, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "(excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at a shareholders meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 302 inclusive)" in Article 298, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "Reference Document for Shareholders Meeting" in Articles 301 and 302 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "reference document for general meeting of members"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "all shareholders (limited to those who may exercise their votes with respect to such matter)" in Article 319, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
第四十一条 会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項ただし書及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条から第三百二条まで（招集手続の省略、株主総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第三百十条から第三百十二条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）、第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）、第三百十九条（第四項を除く。）（株主総会の決議の省略）及び第三百二十条（株主総会への報告の省略）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあり、並びに同法第二百九十八条第一項及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条第二項又は第五十条第二項」と、同条第二項中「（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条から第三百二条までにおいて同じ。）の数」とあるのは「の数」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百一条及び第三百二条中「株主総会参考書類」とあるのは「社員総会参考書類」と、同法第三百十条第七項中「株主（前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同法第三百十九条第一項中「株主（当該事項について議決権を行使することができるものに限る。）の全員」とあるのは「社員の全員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) Notwithstanding the provision of the preceding paragraph, for the persons with disabilities who receive payment pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 29 or paragraph 1 of Article 30, or who live in, the support facilities for the persons with disabilities Nozominosono, or the facilities prescribed in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of paragraph 1 or paragraph 5 of Article 5 after receiving placement measure pursuant to the provision of paragraph 2 of Article 19 of Act for the welfare of Persons with Physical Disabilities or paragraph 1, Article 16 of Act for the welfare of persons with intellectual disabilities; or who live in such facilities pursuant to the provision of proviso of paragraph 1 of Article 30 of Public Assistance Act(Act No. 144 of 1950) (hereafter collectively referred to as "persons with disabilities entered placement in specified facilities" in this paragraph), the municipality where such persons had domiciles before entering the support facilities for persons with disabilities, Nozominosono, the facilities prescribed in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in paragraph 1 or paragraph 5 of Article 5, or the facilities prescribed in proviso of paragraph 1 of Article 30 of the same Act (hereinafter referred to as "specified facilities") shall make grant decision; for persons with disabilities entered placement in specified facilities and have entered successively not less than two facilities (hereinafter referred to as "persons with disabilities entered placement successively" in this paragraph), the municipalities where the first facilities which such persons with disabilities entered placement are located shall make grant decision. Provided, however, for the persons with disabilities entered placement in specified facilities who did not have their domiciles before their placement or their domiciles were not clear, the municipality where they had location at the time of placement (for persons with disabilities entered placement successively: domiciles they had before they entered the first specified facility) shall make grant decision.
３ 前項の規定にかかわらず、第二十九条第一項若しくは第三十条第一項の規定により介護給付費等の支給を受けて又は身体障害者福祉法第十八条第二項若しくは知的障害者福祉法第十六条第一項の規定により入所措置が採られて障害者支援施設、のぞみの園又は第五条第一項若しくは第五項の厚生労働省令で定める施設に入所している障害者及び生活保護法（昭和二十五年法律第百四十四号）第三十条第一項ただし書の規定により入所している障害者（以下この項において「特定施設入所障害者」と総称する。）については、その者が障害者支援施設、のぞみの園、第五条第一項若しくは第五項の厚生労働省令で定める施設又は同法第三十条第一項ただし書に規定する施設（以下「特定施設」という。）への入所前に有した居住地（継続して二以上の特定施設に入所している特定施設入所障害者（以下この項において「継続入所障害者」という。）については、最初に入所した特定施設への入所前に有した居住地）の市町村が、支給決定を行うものとする。ただし、特定施設への入所前に居住地を有しないか、又は明らかでなかった特定施設入所障害者については、入所前におけるその者の所在地（継続入所障害者については、最初に入所した特定施設の入所前に有した所在地）の市町村が、支給決定を行うものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the following acts do not constitute an infringement of the right to the use of a registered 26 trademark- (a) where a trademark is registered subject to any conditions or limitations, the use of the trademark in any manner in relation to goods or services, as the case may be, to be sold or otherwise traded in, in any place, or in relation to goods or services to be exported to any market, or in any other circumstances, to which, having regard to those conditions or limitations, the registration does not extend; (b) by being permitted to use those goods or a bulk of which they form part or services, or a bulk of which they form part by the proprietor of the trademark or any person related to the trade of goods or services in relation with the registered user or to use within the limit of permitted use of the registered proprietor or user, the use of such trademark, unless the registered proprietor or the user subsequently has removed or obliterated it, or has at any time expressly or impliedly consented to the use of the trademark; (c) by registration under this Act- (i) the use of a trademark is within established right by a person in relation to goods or services adapted to form part of, or to be accessory to, other goods or services; (ii) the use of a registered trademark, being one of two or more trademarks registered under this Act which are identical or nearly resemble each other, is in exercise of the right to the use of the trademarks given by registration under this Act.
(1)本法のいかなる規定にかかわらず、次に掲げる行為は登録商標の使用権の侵害に該当しない。(a)商標が何らかの条件又は制限を付して登録されている場合、それらの条件又は制限を考慮して、当該登録の効力が及ばない場所で商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)について販売若しくは取引するため、商品若しくは役務に関しかかる効力の範囲外にある市場へ輸出するため、又はかかる効力の範囲外にあるその他の環境において、いかなる態様であれ当該商標を使用する場合。(b)当該商標の所有者又は登録使用権者に関連する商品若しくは役務の取引に係わる者によってそれらの商品、それらの商品から構成される大量品(バルク)、又は役務、若しくはそれらの役務の集合の利用を許諾受けた使用、又は、登録所有者又は利用権者から許諾を受けた使用の範囲内における当該商標の使用である場合。ただし、登録所有者又は使用権者が後にそれを解消又は抹消しない限り、又はどの時点においても明示黙示を問わず当該商標の使用を承諾している限りにおいてとする。(c)本法に基づく登録により、(i)他の商品若しくは役務の一部を構成するように、又は他の商品若しくは役務に随伴するものとして認められた商品又は役務に関連してある者により設定された範囲内における商標の使用である場合。(ii)登録商標の使用が、本法に基づき登録された2以上の互いに同一又は非常に似ている商標の一つとして、本法に基づき登録により付与された商標の使用権の行使である場合。 - 特許庁 - Article 58 (1) Where a person entitled to the right to receive a disability compensation pension has died, if the total of the amount of the disability compensation pension paid to said person (for the part of said disability compensation pension paid for the period until July of the fiscal year containing the day on which the person died (in cases where the month containing said day on which the person died falls on any of the months from April to July, the previous fiscal year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the provisions of Article 16-6, paragraph (2) as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) and the amount of the disability compensation pension advance lump sum payment pertaining to said disability compensation pension paid to said person (in cases where the grounds for the payment of said disability compensation pension advance lump sum payment arose in or before July of the fiscal year containing said day on which the person died, the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the method of calculating the amount of the compensation pension for surviving family under the provision of said paragraph as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) is less than the amount among those listed in the right-hand column of the following table corresponding to the grade of disability pertaining to the relevant disability compensation pension listed in the left-hand column of said table (in cases where said day on which the person died is August 1 of the fiscal year two years after the fiscal year the day of the occurrence of the grounds for calculation or any subsequent day, the amount to be obtained where the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the provision of Article 8-3, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-4 as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is regarded as the basic daily benefit amount in said table), the government shall, for the time being, pay a disability compensation pension balance lump sum payment equivalent to the amount of such balance as insurance benefits to the surviving family members of said person based on their claims.
第五十八条 政府は、当分の間、障害補償年金を受ける権利を有する者が死亡した場合において、その者に支給された当該障害補償年金の額（当該障害補償年金のうち当該死亡した日の属する年度（当該死亡した日の属する月が四月から七月までの月に該当する場合にあつては、その前年度。以下この項において同じ。）の七月以前の分として支給された障害補償年金にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより第十六条の六第二項の規定の例により算定して得た額）及び当該障害補償年金に係る障害補償年金前払一時金の額（当該障害補償年金前払一時金を支給すべき事由が当該死亡した日の属する年度の七月以前に生じたものである場合にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による遺族補償年金の額の算定の方法に準じ算定して得た額）の合計額が次の表の上欄に掲げる当該障害補償年金に係る障害等級に応じ、それぞれ同表の下欄に掲げる額（当該死亡した日が算定事由発生日の属する年度の翌々年度の八月一日以後の日である場合にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより第八条の四において準用する第八条の三第一項の規定の例により算定して得た額を同表の給付基礎日額とした場合に得られる額）に満たないときは、その者の遺族に対し、その請求に基づき、保険給付として、その差額に相当する額の障害補償年金差額一時金を支給する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 61 (1) Where a person entitled to the right to receive a disability pension has died, if the total of the amount of the disability pension paid to said person (for the part of said disability pension paid for the period until July of the fiscal year containing said day on which the person died (in cases where the month containing the day on which the person died falls in any of the months from April to July, the previous fiscal year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the provisions of Article 16-6, paragraph (2) as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) and the amount of the disability pension advance lump sum payment pertaining to said disability pension paid to said person (in cases where the grounds for the payment of said disability pension advance lump sum payment arose in or before July of the fiscal year containing said day on which the person died, the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the method of calculating the amount of the compensation pension for surviving family under said paragraph as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) is less than the amount among those listed in the right-hand column of the table in Article 58, paragraph (1) corresponding to the grade of disability pertaining to the relevant disability pension listed in the left-hand column of said table (in cases where said day on which the person died is August 1 of the fiscal year two years after the fiscal year containing the day of the occurrence of the grounds for calculation or any subsequent day, the amount to be obtained where the amount obtained by making a calculation in accordance with the provision of Article 8-3, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-4 as provided for by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is regarded as the basic daily benefit amount in said table), the government shall, for the time being, pay a disability pension balance lump sum payment equivalent to the amount of such balance, as insurance benefits, to the surviving family members of said person based on their claims.
第六十一条 政府は、当分の間、障害年金を受ける権利を有する者が死亡した場合において、その者に支給された当該障害年金の額（当該障害年金のうち当該死亡した日の属する年度（当該死亡した日の属する月が四月から七月までの月に該当する場合にあつては、その前年度。以下この項において同じ。）の七月以前の分として支給された障害年金にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより第十六条の六第二項の規定の例により算定して得た額）及び当該障害年金に係る障害年金前払一時金の額（当該障害年金前払一時金を支給すべき事由が当該死亡した日の属する年度の七月以前に生じたものである場合にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより同項の規定による遺族補償年金の額の算定の方法に準じ算定して得た額）の合計額が第五十八条第一項の表の上欄に掲げる当該障害年金に係る障害等級に応じ、それぞれ同表の下欄に掲げる額（当該死亡した日が算定事由発生日の属する年度の翌々年度の八月一日以後の日である場合にあつては、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより第八条の四において準用する第八条の三第一項の規定の例により算定して得た額を同表の給付基礎日額とした場合に得られる額）に満たないときは、その者の遺族に対し、その請求に基づき、保険給付として、その差額に相当する額の障害年金差額一時金を支給する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 13 (1) An Insured Person for whom it is determined that his or her domicile has changed to a location of one of the following facilities (herein referred to as "Facility Subject to Domicile Exception") and is located by admission or residence (herein referred to as "Admission, etc.") in said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception (an Insured Person for whom it is determined that his or her domicile has changed to a location where said Facility is located by moving into said Facility as listed in item (iii) is limited to a person for whom the admission measures are pursuant to the provisions of Article 11, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Public Aid for the Aged Act; hereinafter referred to as "Insured Person Subject to Domicile Exception" in this Article) and for whom it is determined to have had domicile in another Municipality (a Municipality other than the Municipality where said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception is located) at the time of moving in for Admission, etc., at said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception, shall be an Insured Person of Long-Term Care Insurance provided by said other Municipality of prior domicile, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9; however, provided that this provision shall not apply to an Insured Person Subject to Domicile Exception who moved in for Admission, etc., into two or more of a said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception, and said Person is determined to have moved consecutively from one said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception in which said Insured Person was admitted immediately prior to the said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception where said Insured Person is currently residing for Admission, etc. (herein referred to as the "Facility of First Prior Admission of an Insured Person" in this paragraph) into a Facility Subject to Domicile Exception in which said Insured Person is currently residing (herein referred to as the "Facility of Current Admission of an Insured Person" in this paragraph and the following paragraph) (collectively herein referred to as "Specified Continuous Admission of an Insured Person" in the following paragraph):
第十三条 次に掲げる施設（以下「住所地特例対象施設」という。）に入所又は入居（以下この条において「入所等」という。）をすることにより当該住所地特例対象施設の所在する場所に住所を変更したと認められる被保険者（第三号に掲げる施設に入所することにより当該施設の所在する場所に住所を変更したと認められる被保険者にあっては、老人福祉法第十一条第一項第一号の規定による入所措置がとられた者に限る。以下この条において「住所地特例対象被保険者」という。）であって、当該住所地特例対象施設に入所等をした際他の市町村（当該住所地特例対象施設が所在する市町村以外の市町村をいう。）の区域内に住所を有していたと認められるものは、第九条の規定にかかわらず、当該他の市町村が行う介護保険の被保険者とする。ただし、二以上の住所地特例対象施設に継続して入所等をしている住所地特例対象被保険者であって、現に入所等をしている住所地特例対象施設（以下この項及び次項において「現入所施設」という。）に入所等をする直前に入所等をしていた住所地特例対象施設（以下この項において「直前入所施設」という。）及び現入所施設のそれぞれに入所等をすることにより直前入所施設及び現入所施設のそれぞれの所在する場所に順次住所を変更したと認められるもの（次項において「特定継続入所被保険者」という。）については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (4) The provisions concerning the Central Labor Relations Commission and the Prefectural Labor Relations Commission (excluding the provisions of Article 19-2; Article 19-3, paragraphs 1 to 4, inclusive, and the proviso to paragraph 6; Article 19-4, paragraph 2; Article 19-6; Article 19-7, second sentence of paragraph 1, paragraph 4 and paragraph 5; Article 19-10; Article 19-11, paragraph 2 and paragraph 3; paragraph 2, paragraph 3 and paragraph 6 of the preceding article (limited to the part to which the proviso to Article 19-3, paragraph 6 shall apply mutatis mutandis); Article 24, paragraph 2; Article 24-2, paragraph 1, paragraph 2, proviso to paragraph 4 and paragraph 6; Article 26, paragraph 2; and Article 27-23) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Central Labor Relations Commission for Mariners and the Local Labor Relations Commission for Mariners. In this case, the term "seven or more" in Article 19-3, paragraph 5 shall be deemed to be replaced with "three or more"; "the Prime Minister" in Article 19-7, paragraph 2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism"; "with the consent of the Central Labor Relations Commission in the case of an employer member or a labor member, or with the consent of both Houses in the case of a public member" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Central Labor Relations Commission for Mariners"; "the Prime Minister" in paragraph 3 of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism"; "an employer member or a labor member" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "a member of the Central Labor Relations Commission for Mariners"; "Minister of Health, Labor and Welfare" in Article 19-11, paragraph 1 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism"; "under the jurisdiction of the prefectural governors" in paragraph 1 of the preceding Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "whose jurisdictional district shall be that of each District Transport Bureau (excluding districts specified by Cabinet Order for District Transport Bureaus specified by Cabinet Order) and the district specified by the Cabinet Order concerned, and, for the time being, the district of Okinawa prefecture"; "the prefectural governor" in paragraph 6 of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism"; "In cases concerning the labor relations of employees of specified Incorporated Administrative Agency, national forestry businesses, or Japan Post, the Central Labor Relations Commission shall assume exclusive jurisdiction over conciliation, mediation, arbitration, and disposition (with respect to disposition under the provisions of Article 5, paragraph 1, and Article 11, paragraph 1 concerning a labor union which is formed or joined by employees of specified Incorporated Administrative Agency, national forestry businesses, and Japan Post, such disposition shall be limited to that specified by Cabinet Order); and the Central Labor Relations Commission shall assume initial jurisdiction over conciliation, mediation, arbitration, and disposition; and "two or more prefectures" in Article 25, paragraph 1 shall be deemed to be replaced with "two or more jurisdictional districts of the Local Labor Relations Commission for Mariners."
４ 中央労働委員会及び都道府県労働委員会に関する規定（第十九条の二、第十九条の三第一項から第四項まで及び第六項ただし書、第十九条の四第二項、第十九条の六、第十九条の七第一項後段、第四項及び第五項、第十九条の十、第十九条の十一第二項及び第三項、前条第二項、第三項及び第六項（第十九条の三第六項ただし書を準用する部分に限る。）、第二十四条第二項、第二十四条の二第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第六項、第二十六条第二項並びに第二十七条の二十三の規定を除く。）は、船員中央労働委員会及び船員地方労働委員会について準用する。この場合において、第十九条の三第五項中「七人以上」とあるのは「三人以上」と、第十九条の七第二項中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「国土交通大臣」と、「使用者委員及び労働者委員にあつては中央労働委員会の同意を得て、公益委員にあつては両議院」とあるのは「船員中央労働委員会」と、同条第三項中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「国土交通大臣」と、「使用者委員又は労働者委員」とあるのは「船員中央労働委員会の委員」と、第十九条の十一第一項中「厚生労働大臣」とあるのは「国土交通大臣」と、前条第一項中「都道府県知事の所轄の下に」とあるのは「各地方運輸局の管轄区域（政令で定める地方運輸局にあつては、政令で定める区域を除く。）及び当該政令で定める区域を管轄区域として並びに当分の間沖縄県の区域を管轄区域として」と、同条第六項中「都道府県知事」とあるのは「国土交通大臣」と、第二十五条第一項中「特定独立行政法人職員、国有林野事業職員及び日本郵政公社職員の労働関係に係る事件のあつせん、調停、仲裁及び処分（特定独立行政法人職員、国有林野事業職員又は日本郵政公社職員が結成し、又は加入する労働組合に関する第五条第一項及び第十一条第一項の規定による処分については、政令で定めるものに限る。）について、専属的に管轄するほか、二以上の都道府県」とあるのは「二以上の船員地方労働委員会の管轄区域」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
６ 会社法第六十七条（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号を除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十三条第四項（創立総会の決議）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）及び第八十一条（第四項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定（同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。）中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主（創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。）」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間（当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役（保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは設立時監査役（同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - 3. We reaffirm our commitment to coordinated policy action by all G20 members to achieve strong, sustainable and balanced growth. Our main priority actions include implementing medium term fiscal consolidation plans differentiated according to national circumstances in line with our Toronto commitment, pursuing appropriate monetary policy, enhancing exchange rate flexibility to better reflect underlying economic fundamentals and structural reforms, to sustain global demand, increase potential growth, foster job creation and contribute to global rebalancing. We discussed progress made since the Seoul Summit and stressed the need to reduce excessive imbalances and maintain current account imbalances at sustainable levels by strengthening multilateral cooperation. We agreed on a set of indicators that will allow us to focus, through an integrated two-step process, on those persistently large imbalances which require policy actions. To complete the work required for the first step, our aim is to agree, by our next meeting in April, on indicative guidelines against which each of these indicators will be assessed, recognizing the need to take into account national or regional circumstances, including large commodity producers. While not targets, these indicative guidelines will be used to assess the following indicators: (i) public debt and fiscal deficits; and private savings rate and private debt (ii) and the external imbalance composed of the trade balance and net investment income flows and transfers, taking due consideration of exchange rate, fiscal, monetary and other policies. We also adopted a timetable for developing the 2011 action plan that will implement our Framework for Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth and monitor the commitments already made. As agreed in Seoul, we call on the IMF to provide an assessment as part of the Mutual Assessment Process on progress towards external sustainability and consistency of policies at our October meeting. At that time, we will also review a report on the MAP including an action plan informed by the analysis on the root causes of persistently large imbalances based on the agreed guidelines. We will also review an assessment of progress made in meeting commitments made in Seoul.
3. 我々は、強固で持続可能かつ均衡ある成長を達成するための全ての G20 メンバーによる協調した政策措置へのコミットメントを再確認する。我々の主要な優先的政策措置は、トロントでのコミットメントに沿った、各国の状況によって差別化された中期財健全化計画の実施、適切な金融政策の実現、根底にある経済のファンダメンタルズをよりよく反映した、為替レートの柔軟性の向上及び世界需要を維持し、潜在成長を増大させ、雇用創出を助け、世界的なリバランスに貢献する構造改革を含む。我々は、ソウル・サミット以降の進捗を議論し、多角的協調を強化することにより、過度の不均衡を縮小し経常収支を持続可能な水準で維持することの必要性を強調した。我々は、統合された 2 段階のプロセスを通じて、政策措置を必要とするような継続した大規模な不均衡に焦点を当てることを可能にする一連の項目に合意した。第 1段階に必要な作業を完了するため、我々の目標は、大規模な一次産品生産者を含む、国及び地域の状況を考慮する必要性を認識しつつ、4 月の次回会合までに、これらの項目それぞれを評価する参考となるガイドラインに合意することである。これらの参考となるガイドラインは、目標となるものではないが、以下の項目を評価するのに使用される： (i)公的債務と財政赤字、民間貯蓄率と民間債務、(ii)為替・財政・金融・その他の政策を十分に考慮しつつ、貿易収支、投資所得及び対外移転のネットフローから構成される対外バランス。我々はまた、強固で持続可能かつ均衡ある成長のための枠組みを実施し、既に行ったコミットメントをモニターする 2011 年版の行動計画の策定へ向けた予定表を採択した。ソウルで合意したように、我々は、IMF に対し、相互評価プロセスの一部として、対外的な持続可能性と政策の一貫性確保に向けた進捗についての評価を 10 月の会合において提供することを求める。その際、我々はまた、合意されたガイドラインに基づく継続した大規模な不均衡の原因に関する分析によって情報を得て、行動計画を含む MAP に関する報告のレビューを行う。我々はまた、ソウルでのコミットメントを達成するためになされた進捗の評価をレビューする。 - 財務省 - The documents specified by an ordinance set forth in Article 145, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as listed in the following (in case of documents certified by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a document recording the reasons for the merger; (ii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a foreign national: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., the curriculum vitae of said officer, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) through (k) of the Act; (b) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document stating the corporate development, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (l) of the Act; (c) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., and the curriculum vitae of said officer; a certification issued by a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) and (b) of the Act; and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) through (k) of the same item; (iii) a document stating the name or trade name of a Member, etc., and the address of the principal office or head office of the Member, etc.; a sworn, written statement that the Member, etc. is subject to any of the provisions of Article 30, paragraph 1 of the Act for each Commodity Market where transactions are conducted, or a sworn, written statement that trading participants are subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of Article 82, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Act, or any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of item 2 of the same paragraph by each Commodity Market where they conduct - 111 - transactions; a sworn, written statement that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (l) of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act; and in the case where the Commodity Exchange specified in the application carries out settlement by the method set forth in Article 105, paragraph 1 of the Act on one or more Commodity Markets that the Commodity Exchange intends to open, a record pertaining to such person's net assets prepared according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the date of application for approval; (iv) minutes of the general meeting of shareholders approving the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of Members prescribed in Article 144, paragraph 4, Article 144-2, paragraph 2, or Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of shareholders prescribed in Article 144-6, paragraph 1 and Article 144-13, paragraph 1 of the Act, and Article 783, paragraph 1, Article 795, paragraph 1, or Article 804, paragraph 1 of the Company Act) of each Commodity Exchange which carries out the merger, or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for the merger have been followed; (v) a document stating the status of the property, income and expenditure of each Commodity Exchange that carries out the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, the settlement related statements, etc. of the preceding business year; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the financial documents, etc. of the preceding business year and detailed statements thereof); (vi) in the case where a public notice or demand (in cases where the public notice is made through an official gazette, a daily newspaper which publishes matters of current events, or an Electronic Public Notice pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 3 or Article 144-10, paragraph 3 of the Act [including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17), or Article 789, paragraph 3; Article 799, paragraph 3; or Article 810, paragraph 3 of the Company Act, a public notice by such method) is made pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 2 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5; Article 144-2, paragraph 3; and Article 144-3, paragraph 5 of the Act, or Article 144-10, paragraph 2 of the Act (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17 of the Act); Article 789, paragraph 2; Article 799, paragraph 2; or Article 810, paragraph 2 of the Company Act; and in cases where a creditor has made an objection, a document certifying that the liabilities have been paid or reasonable collateral has been provided to said creditor, reasonable property has been deposited for the purpose of repaying the liabilities to said creditor, or that said merger is not likely to harm said creditor; (vii) a document stating a method for business succession pertaining to transactions on a Commodity Market which has been opened by a Commodity Exchange dissolved as a result of a merger; (viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the business of a Commodity Exchange and the status of the assignment of such employees (limited to a case where a Commodity Exchange subsequent to a merger becomes an Incorporated Commodity Exchange); (ix) a document stating the estimated transaction volume of Futures Transactions for one year after the merger on the Commodity Market which he/she seeks to open; (x) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed - 113 - Commodity at the time of a merger, a document stating that it is appropriate to conduct transactions of Listed Commodity Component Products, etc. on a single Commodity Market; (xi) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market at the time of a merger by specifying two or more Commodity Indices as a single Listed Commodity Index, a document stating that the majority of the goods subject to said two or more Commodity Indices shall be common to one another.
法第百四十五条第三項の主務省令で定める書面は、次に掲げる書面（官公署が証明す る書面の場合には、認可の申請の日前三月以内に作成されたものに限る。）とする。 一合併の理由を記載した書面 二次に掲げる場合に応じ、それぞれ次に定める書面 イ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が外国 人である場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書及びその者が法第十五条第二 項第一号イからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 ロ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が法人 である場合当該役員の登記事項証明書、沿革を記載した書面及び法第十五条第 二項第一号ヲに該当しないことを誓約する書面 ハ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が外国 人又は法人でない場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書、その者が法第十五 条第二項第一号イ及びロに該当しない旨の官公署の証明書並びにその者が同号 ハからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 三会員等の氏名又は商号若しくは名称及び主たる事務所又は本店の所在地を記載した 書面、会員が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第三十条第一項各号のいずれかに該当す ることを誓約する書面又は取引参加者が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第八十二条第 一項第一号イからハまで若しくは同項第二号イからハまでのいずれかに該当する ことを誓約する書面、その者が法第十五条第二項第一号イからヲまでのいずれにも 該当しないことを誓約する書面並びに申請に係る商品取引所が開設しようとする一 以上の商品市場において法第百五条第一号に掲げる方法により決済を行う場合には 認可の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号により作成したその者の純資産額に関す る調書 四合併を行う各商品取引所の合併総会（会員商品取引所にあっては、法第百四十四条 第四項、第百四十四条の二第二項又は第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会をいい、 株式会社商品取引所にあっては、法第百四十四条の六第一項、第百四十四条の十三 第一項、会社法第七百八十三条第一項、第七百九十五条第一項又は第八百四条第一 項の株主総会をいう。）の議事録その他必要な手続があったことを証する書面 五合併を行う各商品取引所の財産及び収支の状況を知ることができる書面（会員商品 取引所にあっては最終事業年度の決算関係書類等、株式会社商品取引所にあっては 最終事業年度の計算書類等及びその附属明細書）六法第百四十四条第五項、第百四十四条の二第三項及び第百四十四条の三第五項に おいて準用する法第百二十四条第二項、第百四十四条の十第二項（第百四十四条の 十七において準用する場合を含む。）、会社法第七百八十九条第二項 、第七百九十九 条第二項又は第八百十条第二項の規定による公告及び催告（第百二十四条第三項、 第百四十四条の十第三項（第百四十四条の十七において準用する場合を含む。）、会 社法第七百八十九条第三項、第七百九十九条第三項又は第八百十条第三項の規定に より公告を官報のほか時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙又は電子公告によっ てした場合にあっては、これらの方法による公告）をしたこと並びに異議を述べた 債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しく は当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は - 112 - 当該合併をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 七合併により消滅する商品取引所の開設している商品市場における取引に関する業務 の承継の方法を記載した書面 八商品取引所の業務に関する知識及び経験を有する従業員の確保の状況並びに当該従 業員の配置の状況を記載した書面（合併後の商品取引所が株式会社商品取引所であ る場合に限る。九開設しようとする商品市場における合併後一年間の先物取引の取引量の見込みを記 載した書面 十合併に際して上場商品に係る商品市場を開設しようとする場合にあっては、上場商 品構成物品を一の商品市場で取引をすることが適当である旨を明らかにすることが できる書面 十一合併に際して二以上の商品指数を一の上場商品指数として商品市場を開設しよう とする場合にあっては、当該二以上の商品指数の対象となる物品の大部分が共通し ていることを明らかにすることができる書面 - 経済産業省
- 財務省
- Copyright(C) 財務省
※この記事は財務省ホームページの情報を転載しております。内容には仮訳のものも含まれており、今後内容に変更がある可能性がございます。
財務省は利用者が当ホームページの情報を用いて行う一切の行為について、何ら責任を負うものではありません。
- 経済産業省
- Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
- ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
- 特許庁
- Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
- 金融庁
- Copyright(C) 2026 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
- 原題：”The Corpus Delicti”
邦題：『罪体』 - This work has been released into the public domain by the copyright holder. This applies worldwide.
SOGO_e-text_library責任編集。Copyright(C)2006 by SOGO_e-text_library
この版権表示を残すかぎりにおいて、商業利用を含む複製・再配布が自由に認められます。プロジェクト杉田玄白正式参加テキスト。
- 原題：”The Corpus Delicti”
