「大会社」を含む例文一覧(1794)

＜前へ 1 2 .... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 次へ＞
  • ５　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の決定（第三十四条の二十一の二第一項の規定に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）又は前項の決定をしなければならない場合において、既に第一項又は前項の規定によりされた一以上の決定（以下この項において「既決定」という。）に係る会社その他の者の財務書類の証明と同一の会計期間に係る当該会社その他の者の他の財務書類の証明について一以上の決定（以下この項において「新決定」という。）をしなければならないときは、当該新決定について、同条第一項又は前項の規定による額に代えて、第一号に掲げる額から第二号に掲げる額を控除した額を内閣府令で定めるところによりそれぞれの新決定に係る事実について個別決定ごとの算出額に応じてあん分して得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる額が第二号に掲げる額を超えないときは、同条第一項又は前項の規定による課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。
    (5) In the case where the Prime Minister must render a decision set forth in paragraph (1) (limited to that pertaining to the provisions of Article 34-21-2(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or a decision set forth in the preceding paragraph, if he/she must render one or more decisions on the attestation of financial documents of a company or any other person (hereinafter referred to as the "new decision" in this paragraph) pertaining to the same accounting period as the attestation of financial documents of said company or any other person concerning one or more decisions that have already been rendered pursuant to paragraph (1) or the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as an "existing decision" in this paragraph), the Prime Minister shall render, as the new decision, a decision ordering the respondent to pay to the Treasury, in lieu of the amount under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article or the preceding paragraph, a surcharge of an amount corresponding to the amount obtained by dividing proportionately the amount resulting from deducting the amount set forth in item (ii) from the amount set forth in item (i) in accordance with the amounts calculated for the individual decisions on the facts pertaining to the respective new decisions, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided, however, that the Prime Minister may not order payment of a surcharge under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article or the preceding paragraph when the amount set forth in item (i) does not exceed the amount set forth in item (ii):  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ３　主務大臣は、商品取引所の存続期間（株式会社商品取引所にあつては、株式会社商品取引所としての存続期間）又は商品市場の開設期限が定款に記載され、又は記録されている前条第一項の認可の申請があつた場合においては、第一項第二号の基準に代えて、申請に係る上場商品又は上場商品指数の先物取引を公正かつ円滑にするために十分な取引量が見込まれないことその他上場商品構成物品等の取引の状況に照らし、当該先物取引をする商品取引所が合併により存続すること又は当該先物取引をする商品取引所を合併により設立することが当該上場商品構成物品等の生産及び流通に著しい支障を及ぼし、又は及ぼすおそれがあることに該当しないことを同号の基準とし、当該基準並びに同項第三号及び第四号の基準の適用は、当該存続期間又は開設期限までの間について判断して行うものとする。
    (3) Where an application for the approval under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article has been filed in which case the term of existence of a Commodity Exchange (in the case of a Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the term of existence as an Incorporated Commodity Exchange) or the expiration date of a Commodity Market is stated in the articles of incorporation, the competent minister shall, in lieu of the criterion set forth in paragraph (1), item (ii), consider the criterion under the same paragraph to be that there will be no shortfall in the volume of transactions for carrying out Futures Transactions of the Listed Commodity or Listed Commodity Index pertaining to the application fairly and smoothly and that, in light of the status of the transactions of the Listed Commodity Component Products, etc., survival of a Commodity Exchange for carrying out said Futures Transactions through a merger or the establishment of a Commodity Exchange for carrying out said Futures Transactions by a merger does not or is not likely to cause extreme hindrance to the production and distribution of the Listed Commodity Component Products, etc., and he/she shall apply such criterion and the criteria under items (iii) and (iv) of the same paragraph by making a determination for said term of existence or for the period until said expiration date.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第十三条　銀行の同一人（当該同一人と政令で定める特殊の関係のある者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）に対する信用の供与等（信用の供与、又は出資として政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）の額は、政令で定める区分ごとに、当該銀行の自己資本の額に政令で定める率を乗じて得た額（以下この条において「信用供与等限度額」という。）を超えてはならない。ただし、信用の供与等を受けている者が合併をし、共同新設分割（二以上の株式会社又は合同会社が共同してする新設分割をいう。第十六条の三第四項第四号及び第五十二条の二十二第一項において同じ。）若しくは吸収分割をし、又は事業を譲り受けたことにより銀行の同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が信用供与等限度額を超えることとなる場合その他政令で定めるやむを得ない理由がある場合において、内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。
    Article 13 (1) The total amount of granting of credit, etc. (hereinafter in this Article referring to those specified by a Cabinet Order) by a Bank to one person (including other persons who has a special relationship specified by a Cabinet Order with that person; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall not exceed the amount obtained by multiplying the amount of the Bank's equity capital by the ratio specified by a Cabinet Order for each category provided therein (the amount thus calculated shall be referred to as the "Limit of Granting of Credit, etc." in this Article); provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where the Prime Minister has given the approval in the cases where the total amount of granting of credit, etc. by a Bank to one person exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as a result of a Merger, of Joint Incorporation-Type Split (meaning an Incorporation-Type Split that two or more stock companies or limited liability companies effect jointly; the same shall apply in Articles 16-3(4)(iv) and 52-22(1)) or absorption-type split or of transfer of another person's business by a person who takes granting of credit, etc.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 武富士の貸付はすべて個人向け貸付でありまして、大体約1割ぐらいが自営業を営んでいる個人であるというふうに聞いております。また、会社更生手続が開始されても、借り手においては、約定どおり返済を行っていただくことになるということでございまして、私もこの前ぶら下がり（取材）で借り手の方のことを申し上げましたが、現時点では、中小・零細企業等への影響については確たることは申し上げられないけれども、いずれにしても、金融庁といたしましては、関係省庁や金融関係団体を通じて、政府系金融機関及び全国の民間金融機関に関して、個人向け金融の円滑化の観点から、当社の利用者等からの融資の相談等にきめ細かく対応するように要請を行ったところでございまして、当庁からの要請を受けて、経済産業省においては、武富士の会社更生手続開始の申し立ての影響を受けて、中小企業者を対象として特別窓口を設置する等の措置を講じていただいておるところでございます。
    I have been informed that all of Takefuji's loans are personal loans, of which approximately 10% are for individuals running their own businesses. I might also add that even after corporate rehabilitation procedures commence, borrowers should continue making repayments on agreed-on terms. I indeed commented on borrowers in my previous press conference but, at this point in time, I cannot make any clear reference as to any impact on SMEs, micro-enterprises and so on, except that, from the viewpoint of providing smooth financing for individuals, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) did request government-affiliated financial institutions and private financial institutions nationwide, through competent authorities and financial organizations, to respond attentively to any requests for financing consultation and other matters brought from Takefuji customers and anyone else with concerns. Having been requested by the FSA, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry is in the process of taking relevant steps, including setting up special sections to serve SMEs, in response to Takefuji's filing for corporate reorganization proceedings.  - 金融庁
  • 大阪高裁平成９年２月２７日判決・判時１６２４号１３１頁「控訴人会社は、自ら本件装置を操作するものではないが、被控訴人が管理する音楽著作物の上映権及び演奏権を侵害するおそれの極めて高い、業務用カラオケ装置をユーザーに提供することを内容とする、リース業務を日常的に反復継続する者として、･･･本件装置のユーザーが被控訴人の許諾を得ないまま本件装置をカラオケ伴奏による客の歌唱に使用すれば、被控訴人が管理する音楽著作物の上映権及び演奏権を侵害することになることを知っていたか、仮に知らなかったとしても容易に知り得たのであるから、これを知るべきであったというべきである。しかるところ、控訴人会社は、･･･許諾を得ないまま本件店舗において本件装置を使用して客に歌唱させていることを認識しながら、右著作権侵害の結果を認容しつつ、本件リース契約を継続、更改して本件装置を提供し、控訴人則子及び同隆による前示本件著作権侵害行為に加担したというべきである。」
    Osaka High Court Judgment, February 27, 1997, p.131 of Hanrei Jiho vol. 1624 "The Respondent Company does not operate the Device by itself, but repeatedly conducts a certain lease business which provides commercially used karaoke devices to users which are highly likely to infringe the representation and performance rights of musical works managed by the Appellant [omitted]. If the user uses this Device for providing karaoke music to their customers without being licensed by the Appellant, the user was aware that it violates the representation and performance rights of musical works managed by the Appellant. Alternatively, if he/she was not aware of it, they should have been, as it would be easy for such user to become aware of it. In this particular case, the Respondent Company was aware of the fact that it continued to provide customers with karaoke services by using the Device without holding any license to do so. The Respondent Company continued and renewed the Lease Agreement and provided the Device, silently accepting Therefore, the Respondent acted jointly with Appellants Noriko and Takashi in the aforementioned infringement of copyrights."  - 経済産業省
  • このようなリンクを張られた原告らが、上記中国法人及び当該法人の日本の代理店である被告による上記行為は原告らの名誉及び信用を毀損する共同不法行為を構成するとともに、原告会社との関係では不正競争防止法第２条第１項第１４号所定の不正競争行為に該当するなどとして、被告に対し、損害賠償等を求めた事案がある。この点、裁判所は、被告が、中国法人において本件ウェブページを作成するに当たり、少なくともそのためのデータや資料を提供するなどして、これに関与していたものであり、ひいては同法人が本件表示行為をするに当たって関与したものと認めるのが相当であり、被告は、本件表示行為について、原告会社との関係で社会的信用を害する虚偽の事実を流布するものであるとして、不正競争防止法第2条第1項第14号の不正競争行為であることを認め、原告個人との関係で名誉・信用毀損、氏名権侵害を認めて、同法人と共同不法行為責任を負うものというべきであるなどとして請求の一部を認めた（大阪地裁平成 19年7月26日判決）。
    Further, the dissemination of false information detrimental to the reputation of another person's business may also constitute an unfair competition (Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the same). In a case where the Plaintiffs (the Company (party P1) and its director (party P2)) filed a claim for compensation of damages etc. against the defendant (a Chinese company (party D1) and its agent in Japan (party D2)) on the ground that the D1, which was P1's competitor, indicated on D1's Japanese website as if P1 were an Japanese agent of the D1 and a link was set from D1's website to P1's website. Plaintiff alleged that the aforementioned acts committed by D1 and D2 disparaged P1's reputation and therefore constitute a joint tort. Further, such acts also amounts to unfair competition against P1 as defined in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (the "UCPA"). The court partially accepted the Plaintiffs' claim on the ground that D2 had at least provided data and materials for creating D1's website and D2 was also involved not only in creating such website but also in misrepresenting P1 in D1's website, thereby disseminating false information detrimental to the P1's reputation as referred to in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the ULPA. It was held that D1 and D2 are jointly liable to P2 for libel, defamation and infringement of name rights (Osaka District Court, July 26, 2007).  - 経済産業省
  • ３ 主務大臣は、商品取引所の存続期間（株式会社商品取引所にあつては、株式会社商品取引所としての存続期間）又は商品市場の開設期限が定款に記載され、又は記録されている前条第一項の認可の申請があつた場合においては、第一項第二号の基準に代えて、申請に係る上場商品又は上場商品指数の先物取引を公正かつ円滑にするために十分な取引量が見込まれないことその他上場商品構成物品等の取引の状況に照らし、当該先物取引をする商品取引所が合併により存続すること又は当該先物取引をする商品取引所を合併により設立することが当該上場商品構成物品等の生産及び流通に著しい支障を及ぼし、又は及ぼすおそれがあることに該当しないことを同号の基準とし、当該基準並びに同項第三号及び第四号の基準の適用は、当該存続期間又は開設期限までの間について判断して行うものとする。
    (3) Where an application for the approval under paragraph 1 of the preceding Article has been filed in which case the term of existence of a Commodity Exchange (in the case of a Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the term of existence as a Incorporated Commodity Exchange) or the expiration date of a Commodity Market is stated in the articles of incorporation, the competent minister shall, in lieu of the criterion set forth in paragraph 1, item 2, consider the criterion under the same paragraph to be that there will be no shortfall in the volume of transactions for carrying out Futures Transactions of the Listed Commodity or Listed Commodity Index pertaining to the application fairly and smoothly and that, in light of the status of the transactions of the Listed Commodity Component Products, etc., survival of a Commodity Exchange for carrying out said Futures Transactions through a merger or the establishment of a Commodity Exchange for carrying out said Futures Transactions by a merger does not or is not likely to cause extreme hindrance to the production and distribution of the Listed Commodity Component Products, etc., and he/she shall apply such criterion and the criteria under items 3 and 4 of the same paragraph by making a determination for said term of existence or for the period until said expiration date.  - 経済産業省
  • 第百六十三条　第二条第一項第五号、第七号又は第九号に掲げる有価証券（政令で定めるものを除く。）で金融商品取引所に上場されているもの、店頭売買有価証券又は取扱有価証券に該当するものその他の政令で定める有価証券の発行者（以下この条から第百六十六条までにおいて「上場会社等」という。）の役員及び主要株主（自己又は他人（仮設人を含む。）の名義をもつて総株主等の議決権の百分の十以上の議決権（取得又は保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定めるものを除く。）を保有している株主をいう。以下この条から第百六十六条までにおいて同じ。）は、自己の計算において当該上場会社等の同項第五号、第七号若しくは第九号に掲げる有価証券（政令で定めるものを除く。）その他の政令で定める有価証券（以下この条から第百六十六条までにおいて「特定有価証券」という。）又は当該上場会社等の特定有価証券に係るオプションを表示する同項第十九号に掲げる有価証券その他の政令で定める有価証券（以下この項において「関連有価証券」という。）に係る買付け等（特定有価証券又は関連有価証券（以下この条から第百六十六条までにおいて「特定有価証券等」という。）の買付けその他の取引で政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条、次条及び第百六十五条の二において同じ。）又は売付け等（特定有価証券等の売付けその他の取引で政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条から第百六十五条の二までにおいて同じ。）をした場合（当該役員又は主要株主が委託者又は受益者である信託の受託者が当該上場会社等の特定有価証券等に係る買付け等又は売付け等をする場合であつて内閣府令で定める場合を含む。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）には、内閣府令で定めるところにより、その売買その他の取引（以下この項、次条及び第百六十五条の二において「売買等」という。）に関する報告書を売買等があつた日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、買付け等又は売付け等の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合は、この限りでない。
    Article 163 (1) When an Officer or a Major Shareholder (meaning a shareholder who holds voting rights (excluding those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in consideration of the manner of acquisition or holding thereof or other circumstances) exceeding 10 percent of the Voting Rights Held by All the Shareholders, etc. in the name of him/herself or another person (or under a fictitious name); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article to Article 166) of the Issuer of Securities specified in Article 2(1)(v), (vii) or (ix) which are listed in a Financial Instruments Exchange or falling under the category of Over-the-Counter Traded Securities or Securities Handled (except those specified by a Cabinet Order) or of Securities designated by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter the Issuer is referred to as a "Listed Company, etc." in this Article to Article 166) makes Purchase, etc. of Securities issued by the Listed Company, etc. which fall under any of the categories of Securities specified in Article 2(1)(v), (vii) or (ix) (excluding those specified by a Cabinet Order) or other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter such Securities are referred to as "Specified Securities" in this Article to Article 166) or Securities specified in Article 2(1)(xix) which indicate Options pertaining to Specified Securities of the Listed Company, etc. or other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter such Securities are referred to as "Related Securities" in this paragraph) (the term "Purchase, etc." means purchase of Specified Securities and Related Securities (hereinafter these Securities are collectively referred to as "Specified Securities, etc." in this Article to Article 166) and other transaction specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, the following Article and Article 165-2) or makes Sales, etc. thereof (meaning sales of Specified Securities, etc. and other transaction specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article to Article 165-2), for his/her own account (including the cases where the trustee of a trust of which said Officer or said Major Shareholder is the settlor or beneficiary makes Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. of Specified Securities, etc. of the Listed Company, etc. as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article), said Officer or said Major Shareholder shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, a report on such sales or purchase or other transaction (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase, etc." in this paragraph, the following Article or Article 165-2) to the Prime Minister on or before the 15th day of the month following the month which includes the day of such Sales and Purchase, etc.; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in consideration of the manner of the Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. or other circumstances.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第六十三条　旧法の免許を受けた保険会社がこの法律の施行の際現に旧法第十条第一項の規定により旧法第一条第二項第二号から第四号までに掲げる書類に定めた事項の変更に係る主務大臣の認可を申請している場合には、当該申請を新法第百二十三条第一項の大蔵大臣の認可の申請とみなす。この場合において、当該変更に係る事項が同項の大蔵省令で定める事項に該当するときは、当該変更に係る事項は、同項の大蔵省令で定める事項に該当しないものとみなす。
    Article 63 (1) Where an Insurance Company Licensed under the Former Act has applied, by the time this Act enters into force, for the authorization of the competent minister pertaining to the modification of matters prescribed in any of the documents listed in Article 1, paragraph (2), items (ii) to (iv) inclusive of the Former Act pursuant to the provision of Article 10, paragraph (1) of the Former Act, such application shall be deemed as the application for the authorization of the Minister of Finance set forth in Article 123, paragraph (1) of the Current Act. In this case, the matters to be modified shall be deemed to be outside the scope of the matters set forth in that paragraph to be prescribed by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance even when such matters do fall under the matters prescribed by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance set forth in that paragraph.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第九十四条　旧外国保険事業者法の免許を受けた外国保険会社等がこの法律の施行の際現に旧外国保険事業者法第十九条において準用する旧法第十条第一項の規定により旧外国保険事業者法第四条第四項第二号から第五号までに掲げる書類に定めた事項の変更に係る主務大臣の認可を申請している場合は、当該申請を新法第二百七条において準用する新法第百二十三条第一項の大蔵大臣の認可の申請とみなす。この場合において当該変更に係る事項が同項の大蔵省令で定める事項に該当するときは、当該変更に係る事項は、同項の大蔵省令に定める事項に該当しないものとみなす。
    Article 94 Where a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. Licensed under the Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act has applied, by the time when this Act enters into force, for the authorization of the competent minister pertaining to the modification of any of the matters prescribed in the documents listed in Article 4, paragraph (4), items (ii) to (v) inclusive of the Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act pursuant to the provision of Article 10, paragraph (1) of the Former Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 19 of the Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act, such application shall be deemed as an application for the authorization of the Minister of Finance set forth in Article 123, paragraph (1) of the Current Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 207 of the Current Act. In this case, the matters to be modified shall be deemed to be outside the scope of the matters set forth in that paragraph to be prescribed by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance even when such matters do fall under the matters prescribed by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance set forth in that paragraph.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • なかなか、これは大変な話で、何度も言っているように、小泉（元総理）さんがガタガタにしてしまった郵政事業をその前の姿に戻すというのであればわりと簡単かもしれませんが、そうではないのです。地域のため、また日本全体のため、世界のために、世界一と言っても良い日本郵政株式会社をどうしていくか、という一大事業でありますので、なかなか大変でありますけれども、現在、国民の方々の声を幅広く聞かせていただく、またアドバイスもいただく。そうした、国民の皆さん方と一体となった中でこの事業を成し遂げたいという、かねがね皆様方に申し上げているそうした方針で、現在、取り組んでおります。順調に行っているかどうかと言われると、こういうのは最後の最後にならないと、きちんとした形というのは作れないわけでありますが、それぞれの立場で頑張ってくれておりますので、大体、月末までには一つの方向性を出せるのではないかなと考えております。
    This is a rather difficult task, and as I have said over and over again, although it might be easy to restore the postal businesses, whose foundations were shaken by Mr. Koizumi (former Prime Minister), to their former status, that is not what we are going to do. As we are undertaking a grand project of considering how to make use of Japan Post, which we may say is the biggest in the world, for the benefit of the whole of Japan and the entire world, this is a rather challenging task. We are now seeking public opinions and advice from far and wide. We are undertaking this project in the hope of achieving it together with the people, as I have been saying. If you ask me whether our study is proceeding smoothly, I can only say that a plan like this does not take a clear shape until the very last moment. In any case, everyone is doing his part in his own position, so we will be able to set forth a direction by around the end of this month.  - 金融庁
  • 計画経済期には中国経済において圧倒的な地位を占めていた国有企業は、改革・開放を経て、工業生産総額に占めるシェアを大幅に低下させており、また、国有企業全体に占める赤字企業の比率は上昇している状況である。1980年代半ばから本格的に実施されてきた国有企業改革は、結局、国有企業の経営状況の改善をもたらさなかったと言える。この背景として、競争激化と国有企業自体の抱える構造的な負担が挙げられる。また、現在、大多数の国有企業は民営化の方向に向かいつつあるが、特に、株式会社への改組・上場が行われた大型国有企業に関し、大きく2つのコーポレート・ガバナンス上の問題が存在する。1つは、ガバナンスを効かせる主体に関する問題であり、もう１つは、近年の資本市場の動きに併せて整備されてきた会計制度が抱える問題である。
    The market share of state-owned enterprises, which were dominant in the period of the planned economy,has dwindled dramatically in terms of total industrial production through the process of reform and open has dwindled dramatically in terms of total industrial production through the process of reform and openhas dwindled dramatically in terms of total industrial production through the process of reform and open involves the issue of a main body seeking corporate governance, the other issue concerns accounting systems that are adjusted to harmonize with recent trends in the capital market. - 経済産業省
  • しかし、同時にそれでは今から保険の行政に関してどういう点をやっているのか。まだ日本ほど保険が進んでいるとは思っておりませんけれども、しかし同時に、日本の保険業界もご存じのように大変ここ10年間株価は下がる、あるいは金利が下がるということで、費差益・利差益・死差益というのが保険業にはございますが、本当に利差益が少なくて大変一時は末端逆ざやが1兆円余の保険業界でもあるというような冬の時代が長く続きましたけれども、多くのかなりの、我々が27年前に通ったころは、日本の名前がついた生命保険会社法だったのですけれども、今色々な外資からも変わったところもありますので、そんなことを含めて今度アメリカでも保険ということが、ご存じのようにアメリカは保険の基本的監督は州単位なんですよ、アメリカの政府は。州単位で保険をやっていまして、連邦政府というのは、金融規制改革法で初めて連邦政府の中に保険担当の部署をつくるんですよ、今度初めて。しかしながら、AIUなんていう世界で一番大きな民間保険会社をアメリカは実質国営化しましたけれども、そこら辺で保険業界というのはちょっと穴と言ったらおかしいけれども、中央政府と今まで交渉しましても、これは中央政府の話だということもしばしばございまして、そういった意味で保険というのはなかなか、アメリカは合衆国ですから、税金なんかも州によって違いますね。
    Simultaneously, how should insurance be regulated and supervised from now on? I believe insurance in China is not as advanced as in Japan yet. But then again, Japan’s insurance industry has experienced falling stock prices and interest rates over the past decade and suffered a long period of winter-like hardship: the insurance sector, where they have something called “expense profits”, “interest gain” and “mortality profits”, the interest gain was so squeezed that at one point, negative carry was more than 1 trillion yen. In the United States, the federal government will be establishing a division in charge of insurance for the first time within the federal government organization under the financial reform legislation. As you know, basic supervision of insurance in the United States is conducted on a state-by-state basis. Despite the fact that AIU—the world’s biggest private insurance company—was effectively nationalized in the United States, the insurance industry has been a bit of a blind spot in that any attempts in the past to negotiate with the central government often resulted in being told that it was a matter for the state government. The United States is a federal republic comprised of states, so in that sense, insurance varies from state to state in tax and other aspects.  - 金融庁
  • 第百一条　この法律の施行の際現に新法第二百十八条第一項第一号の施設に該当する施設を設置している旧外国保険事業者法第二条第一項に規定する外国保険事業者で、旧外国保険事業者法の免許を受けた外国保険会社等でないものは、施行日から起算して六月以内に、その間に新法第百八十五条第一項の免許を受け、又は当該施設を廃止し、若しくは同号イ又はロに掲げる業務を廃止した場合を除き、当該施設について同号イ又はロに掲げる業務の内容、当該業務を行う施設の所在地その他新法第二百十八条第一項の大蔵省令で定める事項を大蔵大臣に届け出なければならない。この場合において、当該届出は、同項の規定によりされた届出とみなす。
    Article 101 That foreign insurance business operator prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act which has established an office falling under Article 218, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Current Act by the time this Act enters into force and which is not a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. Licensed under the Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act shall, within six months from the Effective Date, notify the content of the business listed in (a) or (b) of that item concerning such office, the location of the office to carry on such business and other matters set forth in Article 218, paragraph (1) of the Current Act to be prescribed by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance, unless it obtains, in the meantime, the license set forth in Article 185, paragraph (1) of the Current Act, or has abolished such office or the business listed in (a) or (b) of that item. In this case, such notification shall be deemed as notification made under Article 218, paragraph (1) of the Current Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第百九十四条の三　内閣総理大臣は、金融商品取引業者（第二十八条第一項に規定する第一種金融商品取引業を行う者に限る。）、登録金融機関、取引所取引許可業者、認可金融商品取引業協会、金融商品取引所、外国金融商品取引所、金融商品取引清算機関又は証券金融会社に対し次に掲げる処分をすることが有価証券の流通又は市場デリバティブ取引に重大な影響を与えるおそれがあると認めるときは、あらかじめ、有価証券の流通又は市場デリバティブ取引の円滑を図るために必要な措置に関し、財務大臣に協議しなければならない。
    Article 194-3 When the Prime Minister finds that giving of the dispositions listed in the following to a Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to an operator of the Type I Financial Instruments Business set forth in Article 28(1)), Registered Financial Institution, Authorized Transaction-at-Exchange Operator, Authorized Financial Instruments Firms Association, Financial Instruments Exchange, Foreign Financial Instruments Exchange, Financial Instruments Clearing Organization or a Securities Finance Company is likely to give material influence on distribution of Securities or Market Transactions of Derivatives, he/she shall consult in advance with the Minister of Finance about measures necessary for achieving smooth distribution of Securities or Market Transactions of Derivatives:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ２　第百八条第一項及び第二項並びに会社法第三百四十六条第三項及び第四百七十九条第一項の規定は、清算執行人又は清算監督人について準用する。この場合において、第百八条第二項中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣（特別清算が開始された場合にあつては、裁判所）」と、同法第三百四十六条第三項中「前項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十三条第二項において読み替えて準用する投資法人法第百八条第二項」と、同法第四百七十九条第一項中「前条第二項から第四項までの規定により裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣又は裁判所」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。
    (2) Article 108, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of this Act and the provisions of Article 346, paragraph (3), and Article 479, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an executive liquidator or liquidation supervisor. In this case, the term "the Prime Minister" in Article 108, paragraph (2) of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister (in cases where a special liquidation has been commenced, the court)," the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 346, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 108, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms pursuant to Article 153, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "the court pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs (2) through (4) of the preceding Article" in Article 479, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister or the court," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第四条の二　大規模地震対策特別措置法（昭和五十三年法律第七十三号）第九条第一項の規定に基づく地震災害に関する警戒宣言（以下この条において「警戒宣言」という。）が発せられたときは、同法第三条第一項の規定により地震防災対策強化地域として指定された地域のうち当該警戒宣言に係る地域内に所在する保険の目的については、保険会社等は、当該警戒宣言が発せられた時から同法第九条第三項の規定に基づく地震災害に関する警戒解除宣言が発せられた日（当該警戒宣言に係る大規模な地震が発生するに至つた場合にあつては、財務大臣が地震保険審査会の議を経て告示により指定をする日）までの間、政府の再保険契約に係る地震保険契約（政令で定めるものを除く。）を新たに締結することができない。
    Article 4-2 (1) When a warning declaration about an earthquake disaster under the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 9 of the Act on Special Measures for Large-scale Earthquakes (Act No. 73 of 1978) (hereinafter referred to as "warning declaration" in this Article) is issued, insurance companies, etc. may not enter into any new earthquake insurance contract to be covered by the reinsurance contract of the government (excluding those prescribed by a Cabinet Order) for subjects located in areas pertaining to said warning declaration and designated as areas for intensified countermeasures against the earthquake by the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 3 of the same Act from the time when the warning declaration is issued until the day when the warning declaration is withdrawn under the provision of paragraph (3) of Article 9 of the same Act (or, where the large scale earthquake pertaining to the warning declaration does occur, until the day designated by the Minister of Finance in a public notice after consultation with the Earthquake Insurance Council).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第五十二条の二　一の銀行の総株主の議決権の百分の五を超える議決権又は一の銀行持株会社の総株主の議決権の百分の五を超える議決権の保有者（国、地方公共団体その他これらに準ずるものとして政令で定める法人（第五十二条の九において「国等」という。）を除く。以下この章及び第九章において「銀行議決権大量保有者」という。）は、内閣府令で定めるところにより、銀行議決権大量保有者となつた日から五日（日曜日その他政令で定める休日の日数は、算入しない。次条第一項において同じ。）以内（保有する議決権の数に増加がない場合その他の内閣府令で定める場合にあつては、内閣府令で定める日以内）に、次に掲げる事項を記載した届出書（以下この章において「銀行議決権保有届出書」という。）を内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。
    Article 52-2 (1) A person who holds voting rights that exceed five hundredths of the Voting Rights Held by All of the Shareholders of a single Bank or voting rights that exceed five hundredths of the Voting Rights Held by All of the Shareholders of a single Bank Holding Company (such person shall exclude the State, local public entity, or any juridical person specified by a Cabinet Order as one equivalent thereto (referred to as the "State, etc." in Article 52-9)); hereinafter referred to as a "Major Holder of the Bank's Voting Rights" in this Chapter and Chapter IX) shall, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, submit a written notice containing the following matters (hereinafter referred to as a "Written Notice of Holding the Bank's Voting Rights" in this Chapter) to the Prime Minister within five days (Sundays and other holidays specified by a Cabinet Order shall not be included in the number of days; the same shall apply in paragraph (1) of the following Article) from the day on which he/she became a Major Holder of the Bank's Voting Rights (within the number of days specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in the case where the number of voting rights held has not increased or in any other case specified by the Cabinet Office Ordinance):  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第五十二条の二の十一　一の銀行の総株主の議決権の百分の五を超える議決権又は一の銀行持株会社の総株主の議決権の百分の五を超える議決権の保有者（国、地方公共団体その他これらに準ずるものとして政令で定める法人（第五十二条の九において「国等」という。）を除く。以下この章及び第九章において「銀行議決権大量保有者」という。）は、内閣府令で定めるところにより、銀行議決権大量保有者となつた日から五日（日曜日その他政令で定める休日の日数は、算入しない。次条第一項において同じ。）以内（保有する議決権の数に増加がない場合その他の内閣府令で定める場合にあつては、内閣府令で定める日以内）に、次に掲げる事項を記載した届出書（以下この章において「銀行議決権保有届出書」という。）を内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。
    Article 52-2-11 (1) A person who holds voting rights that exceed five hundredths of the voting rights of all of a single Bank's shareholders or voting rights that exceed five hundredths of the voting rights of all of a single Bank Holding Company's shareholders (such person shall exclude the State, local public entity, or any juridical person specified by Cabinet Order as one equivalent thereto (collectively referred to as the "State, etc." in Article 52-9); hereinafter referred to as a "Major Holder of Voting Rights in a Bank" in this Chapter and Chapter IX) shall, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance, submit a written notice containing the following matters (hereinafter referred to as a "Written Notice of Voting Rights Held in a Bank" in this Chapter) to the Prime Minister within five days (Sundays and other holidays specified by Cabinet Order shall not be included in the number of days; the same shall apply in paragraph (1) of the following Article) from the day on which he/she became a Major Holder of Voting Rights in the Bank (within the number of days specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance in the case where the number of voting rights held has not increased or in any other case specified by the Cabinet Office Ordinance):  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 早速色々（報道されており）、どこかの新聞を読ませて頂きましたら、届出制で、届出すれば何でもできるんだというふうなどこかの記事がございましたが、そうではなくて、届出しても今言ったように、他の金融機関への配慮義務、あるいは民営化委員会への通知、それから最後は、内閣総理大臣、（すなわち委任を受けている）金融担当大臣及び総務大臣による監督上の命令まで出来るわけですから、そういった他の保険会社にはない上乗せ規制があるということを十分に、そう法律に書いてありますから、ぜひそのことをご理解して頂いて、特に外国の報道機関の方もおられますので、そこら辺は是非誤解のないようにご理解をして頂きたいというふうに思っております。
    This matter has been reported in various news articles, and one article asserted that Japan Post Insurance would be allowed to do anything as long as it notifies the authorities. However, that is not true. Even if Japan Post Insurance notifies the authorities, it will have to give consideration to competition with other financial institutions and notify the privatization committee, and it is subject to orders from the Minister for Financial Services, acting on behalf of the Prime Minister, and the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications. I would like you to understand that Japan Post Insurance is subject to such additional regulations, which are not applicable to other insurance companies, as stipulated in the law. In particular, I would like foreign correspondents here to avoid misunderstanding in that respect.  - 金融庁
  • 第二百七十一条の十六　内閣総理大臣は、保険主要株主が法令若しくは法令に基づく内閣総理大臣の処分に違反したとき又は公益を害する行為をしたときは、当該保険主要株主に対し監督上必要な措置を命じ、又は当該保険主要株主の第二百七十一条の十第一項若しくは第二項ただし書の認可を取り消すことができる。この場合において、同条第一項の認可のうち設立に係るものは、当該認可を受けて設立された会社その他の法人である保険主要株主に対して与えられているものとみなす。
    Article 271-16 (1) The Prime Minister may, when a Major Shareholder of Insurance Company has violated any laws and regulations or a disposition given by the Prime Minister based on any laws and regulations or has committed an act that harms the public interest, order that Major Shareholder of the Insurance Company to take necessary measures for the purpose of supervision, or rescind the authorization set forth in Article 271-10, paragraph (1) or the proviso to Article 271-10, paragraph (2) for that Major Shareholder of the Insurance Company. In this case, the authorization set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article that pertains to establishment shall be deemed to be granted to the Major Shareholder of Insurance Companies, which is the company or any other juridical person that has been established under the authorization.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ２　前項の規定により同項に規定する者（以下「旧法の免許を受けた保険会社」という。）が受けたものとみなされる新法第三条第一項の大蔵大臣の免許は、その者に係る旧法第一条第一項の免許（旧法第百五十九条等の規定により受けたものとみなされる場合における当該免許を含む。）が旧法の生命保険事業又は損害保険事業のいずれを営むことにつき受けた免許であるかの区分に応じ、それぞれ新法第三条第四項の生命保険業免許又は同条第五項の損害保険業免許とする。
    (2) The license of the Financial Minister set forth in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Current Act that shall be deemed as obtained by the persons prescribed in the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as the "Insurance Companies Licensed under the Former Act") pursuant to the provision of that paragraph shall be the life insurance business license as defined in Article 3, paragraph (4) of the Current Act or the non-life insurance business license as defined in paragraph (5) of that Article, in accordance with the category of business, i.e. the life insurance business or non-life insurance business, that the person was allowed to carry on under the license set forth in Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Former Act (including the license that the person is deemed to have obtained pursuant to the Provision of Article 159 of the Former Act, etc.).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 不動産市況が益々悪化していまして、昨日も不動産開発会社が民事再生法の適用申請をしたということで、破綻（はたん）が相次いでいるわけですが、その背景には金融機関が貸出姿勢を急変させていると、いずれも資金繰りに窮しているという事情があると思いますが、金融機関が不動産関連企業の選別を今進めている現状について、これはバブル解消に向けた健全な調整だとお考えなのか、あるいは、これが景気に悪影響を与える現象として大臣も懸念されているのか、一つ一つ改めてお伺いしたいのと、もう一つは不動産流動化市場において、そもそもこのバブル的な現象はあったと大臣はお考えになっているのか、この二点をお伺いします。
    With the condition of the real estate market deteriorating further, a real estate developer filed for the application of the civil rehabilitation act, the latest in the recent series of failures of real estate firms. I think that a credit squeeze due to an abrupt change in financial institutions' lending stance is behind these failures. Do you think that financial institutions' adoption of a selective stance toward real estate companies is a healthy process toward resolving a market bubble? Or are you worried that it may have a negative impact on the economy? Also, do you think that there was a bubble in the market for real estate securitization in the first place?  - 金融庁
  • 今ご指摘のように、主要行の4-6月期の決算、実は多くの大幅増益となったということでございますが、主要行等の平成22年度の6月期決算は先週の金曜日でございますが、7月30日までに出揃ったところでございますが、今もご指摘のように今般公表された主要行の6月期決算では、資金利益が落ち込む一方、これはご存じのように利ざやですね、落ち込む一方、投資信託の販売手数料など、役務収益が回復している中、国債等の売買といった市場関連収益の増加のほか、与信関連費用が減少したことにより、これはご存じのように大型の会社の倒産というのが比較的この期（4-6月期）少なかったし、まあ、そういったこともございまして、それからそういったことの貸倒引当金、それから償却等が減りましたので、そんなことがプラスに働いたのではないかと思っておりますけれども、最終的な利益は前年同月比ではおおむね増収となりました。
    As you just mentioned, many major banks posted a substantial increase in earnings for the April-June quarter. The financial results of all major banks and other financial institutions for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 became available to the public by last Friday, on July 30. As pointed out just now, the financial results of major banks for the quarter ended June 30 released to the public recently revealed that their gross financial margin—which, as you know, is the profit margin—decreased, whereas market-related revenue such as proceeds from selling and purchasing of government bonds and other such financial instruments increased, while service revenue such as sales commission of investment trusts recovered. In addition, credit-related expenses decreased, as relatively few large-scale corporate bankruptcies during the April-June quarter brought about the decrease in the allowance for doubtful accounts, write-offs and so forth. I believe these factors made a positive contribution, and by and large, resulted in an increase in net income on a year-on-year basis.  - 金融庁
  • 第百六十五条の二　組合等（民法第六百六十七条第一項に規定する組合契約によつて成立する組合、投資事業有限責任組合契約に関する法律第二条第二項に規定する投資事業有限責任組合（以下この条において「投資事業有限責任組合」という。）若しくは有限責任事業組合契約に関する法律第二条に規定する有限責任事業組合（以下この条において「有限責任事業組合」という。）又はこれらの組合に類似する団体で政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）のうち当該組合等の財産に属する株式に係る議決権が上場会社等の総株主等の議決権に占める割合が百分の十以上であるもの（以下この条において「特定組合等」という。）については、当該特定組合等の組合員（これに類するものとして内閣府令で定める者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）が当該特定組合等の財産に関して当該上場会社等の特定有価証券等に係る買付け等又は売付け等をした場合（当該特定組合等の組合員の全員が委託者又は受益者である信託の受託者が、当該上場会社等の特定有価証券等に係る買付け等又は売付け等をする場合であつて内閣府令で定める場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）には、当該買付け等又は売付け等を執行した組合員（これに準ずるものとして内閣府令で定める組合員を含む。以下この条において同じ。）は、内閣府令で定めるところにより、その売買等に関する報告書を売買等があつた日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、買付け等又は売付け等の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合は、この限りでない。
    Article 165-2 (1) With regard to Partnerships, etc. (meaning partnerships established based on partnership contract provided in Article 667(1) of the Civil Code, Investment LPS provided in Article 2(2) of the Limited Partnership Act for Investment (hereinafter referred to as "Investment LPS" in this Article) or a Limited Liability Partnership provided in Article 2 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act (hereinafter referred to as "Limited Liability Partnership" in this Article), or other similar organizations specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) whose assets includes shares of a Listed Company, etc. which represent voting rights equal to or greater than 10 percent of the Voting Rights held by All of its Shareholders, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Partnerships, etc." in this Article), when one of the partners of Specified Partnerships, etc. (including persons specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as similar to a partner of Specified Partnerships, etc. under a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) makes Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. of Specified Securities, etc. of the Listed Company, etc. in relation to the assets of the Specified Partnerships, etc. (including the cases where the trustee of a trust of which all of the partners of the Specified Partnerships, etc. are the settlor or beneficiary makes Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. of Specified Securities, etc. of the Listed Company, etc. as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), the partner having executed the Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. (including a partner specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as equivalent to such a partner specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, a report on the Sales and Purchase, etc. to the Prime Minister on or before the 15th day of the month following the month which includes the day of the Sales and Purchase, etc.; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in consideration of the manner of the Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. or other circumstances.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ２　法第三十二条の三第二項の厚生労働省令で定めるときは、芸能家（放送番組（広告放送を含む。）、映画、寄席、劇場等において音楽、演芸その他の芸能の提供を行う者）若しくはモデル（商品展示等のため、ファッションショーその他の催事に出席し、若しくは新聞、雑誌等に用いられる写真等の制作の題材となる者又は絵画、彫刻その他の美術品の創作の題材となる者）の職業に紹介した求職者又は科学技術者（高度の科学的、専門的な知識及び手段を応用し、研究を行い、又は生産その他の事業活動に関する技術的事項の企画、管理、指導等を行う者）、経営管理者（会社その他の団体の経営に関する高度の専門的知識及び経験を有し、会社その他の団体の経営のための管理的職務を行う者）若しくは熟練技能者（職業能力開発促進法（昭和四十四年法律第六十四号）第四十四条第一項に規定する技能検定のうち特級若しくは一級の技能検定に合格した者が有する技能又はこれに相当する技能を有し、生産その他の事業活動において当該技能を活用した業務を行う者）の職業に紹介した求職者（当該紹介により就いた職業の賃金の額が厚生労働大臣の定める額を超える者に限る。）から、就職後六箇月以内に支払われた賃金の百分の十・五（免税事業者にあつては、百分の十・二）に相当する額以下の手数料を徴収するときとする。
    (2) The cases specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare as provided by Article 32-3, paragraph 2 of the Act shall be the cases under which a fee equivalent to or less than ten-point-five hundredths (10.5/100) (or ten-point-two hundredths (10.2/100) in case of a tax-exempt business provider) of the wages paid during the six-month period after the employment is collected from the job seeker who had been introduced to an occupation of entertainer (who provides entertainment such as music, theatrical entertainment or other performance art in broadcasting programs (including commercial broadcasting), movies, vaudeville, theaters, etc.) or modeling (who appears at fashion shows or other events or serves as a material for a creation of photographs, etc. used for newspapers, magazines, etc. for demonstrating commercial goods, or who serves as a material for a creation of painting, carving or other works of art), or the job seeker who had been introduced to an occupation of scientist (who engages in researches and studies by applying highly scientific and specialized knowledge and means, or the planning, management, instruction, etc. of technical matters for production or other business activities), management executive (who has highly specialized knowledge and experience for the management of a company or other association and provides management businesses for the management of a company or other association) or skilled worker (who has the skill of a person having passed the technical skill test provided by Article 44, paragraph 1 of the Human Resources Development Promotion Act (Act No. 64 of 1969) for the special grade or the first grade or any corresponding skill, and provides businesses utilizing such skill for production or other business activities) (limited to the persons whose wages for the jobs, obtained by them through such introduction, exceed the amount determined by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第二十四条の六　金融商品取引所に上場されている株券、流通状況が金融商品取引所に上場されている株券に準ずるものとして政令で定める株券その他政令で定める有価証券（以下この条、第二十七条の二十二の二から第二十七条の二十二の四まで及び第百六十七条において「上場株券等」という。）の発行者である会社は、会社法第百五十六条第一項（同法第百六十五条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合を含む。）の規定による株主総会の決議又は取締役会の決議があつた場合には、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該決議があつた株主総会又は取締役会（以下この項において「株主総会等」という。）の終結した日の属する月から同法第百五十六条第一項第三号に掲げる期間の満了する日の属する月までの各月（以下この項において「報告月」という。）ごとに、当該株主総会等の決議に基づいて各報告月中に行つた自己の株式に係る上場株券等の買付けの状況（買付けを行わなかつた場合を含む。）に関する事項その他の公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定める事項を記載した報告書を、各報告月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。
    Article 24-6 (1) A company which has issued share certificates listed in a Financial Instruments Exchange, share certificates specified by a Cabinet Order as those of which the state of distribution can be regarded as being equivalent to share certificates listed in a Financial Instruments Exchange or other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Listed Share Certificates, etc." in this Article, Articles 27-22-2 to 27-22-4 and Article 167) shall, when a resolution of a shareholders meeting or board of directors' meeting set forth in Article 156(1) of the Companies Act (including the cases where it is applied by replacing certain terms pursuant to Article 165(3) of said Act) are made, submit a report which, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, states matters pertaining to the status of buyback of Listed Share Certificates, etc. issued by itself conducted based on the resolution of the shareholders meeting or board of directors' meeting (hereinafter referred to as the "Shareholders Meeting, etc." in this paragraph) during each month from the month which includes the day when the resolution of the Shareholders Meeting, etc. is made to the month which includes the day when the period set forth in Article 156(1)(iii) of said Act is to expire (each month is referred to as the "Reporting Month" in this paragraph) (including the cases where no buyback is conducted) and other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors to the Prime Minister by the 15th day of the month following each Reporting Month.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ２　前項の規定により、外国銀行が第四条第一項の内閣総理大臣の免許を受けたときは、その主たる外国銀行支店及び当該外国銀行の日本における他の支店その他の営業所（以下この章において「従たる外国銀行支店」という。）（以下この章において「外国銀行支店」と総称する。）を一の銀行とみなし、当該外国銀行の日本における代表者を当該一の銀行とみなされた外国銀行支店の取締役とみなして、この法律の規定を適用する。ただし、第四条の二、第五条、第六条、第七条の二第四項、第八条、第十三条第二項及び第四項、第十四条第二項、第二章の二、第十九条第二項、第二十条第二項、第二十一条第二項、第二十二条、第二十三条、第二十四条第二項及び第三項（これらの規定中子法人等に係る部分に限る。）、第二十五条第二項及び第五項（これらの規定中子法人等に係る部分に限る。）、第三十条第一項及び第二項、第三十二条から第三十三条の二まで、第三十六条（会社分割に係る部分に限る。）、第三十七条第一項第二号及び第三号、第三十九条、第四十条、第四十一条第二号（会社分割に係る部分に限る。）及び第三号、第四十三条、第四十四条、第七章の二、第五十三条第一項（第一号、第五号及び第八号を除く。）、第二項、第三項及び第五項、第五十五条第二項及び第三項、第五十六条第五号から第九号まで、第五十七条並びに第五十七条の二第二項の規定を除く。
    (2) When a Foreign Bank has obtained a license from the Prime Minister as set forth in Article 4(1) pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the provisions of this Act shall apply by deeming the Principal Branch Office of the Foreign Bank and any other branch offices or other business offices of that Foreign Bank in Japan (hereinafter referred to as "Secondary Branch Offices of the Foreign Bank" in this Chapter) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Foreign Bank Branch" in this Chapter) as a single Bank and deeming that Foreign Bank's representative person in Japan as a director of that Foreign Bank Branch that has been deemed as a single Bank; provided, however, that this shall exclude the application of provisions of Article 4-2, Article 5, Article 6, Article 7-2(4), Article 8, Article 13(2) and (4), Article 14(2), Chapter II-II, Article 19(2), Article 20(2), Article 21(2), Article 22, Article 23, Article 24(2) and (3) (limited to the part of these provisions that pertains to Subsidiaries, etc.), Article 25(2) and (5) (limited to the part of these provisions that pertains to Subsidiaries, etc.), Article 30(1) and (2), Articles 32 to 33-2 inclusive, Article 36 (limited to the part that pertains to company split), Article 37(1)(ii) and (iii), Article 39, Article 40, Article 41(ii) (limited to the part that pertains to company split) and (iii), Article 43, Article 44, Chapter VII-II, Article 53(1) (excluding items (i), (v) and (viii)), (2), (3) and (5), Article 55(2) and (3), Article 56(v) to (ix) inclusive, Article 57 and Article 57-2(2).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ２　前項の規定により、外国銀行が第四条第一項の内閣総理大臣の免許を受けたときは、その主たる外国銀行支店及び当該外国銀行の日本における他の支店その他の営業所（以下この章において「従たる外国銀行支店」という。）（以下この章において「外国銀行支店」と総称する。）を一の銀行とみなし、当該外国銀行の日本における代表者を当該一の銀行とみなされた外国銀行支店の取締役とみなして、この法律の規定を適用する。ただし、第四条の二、第五条、第六条、第七条の二第四項、第八条、第十三条第二項及び第四項、第十四条第二項、第二章の二、第十九条第二項、第二十条第二項、第二十一条第二項、第二十二条、第二十三条、第二十四条第二項及び第三項（これらの規定中子法人等に係る部分に限る。）、第二十五条第二項及び第五項（これらの規定中子法人等に係る部分に限る。）、第三十条第一項及び第二項、第三十二条から第三十三条の二まで、第三十六条（会社分割に係る部分に限る。）、第三十七条第一項第二号及び第三号、第三十九条、第四十条、第四十一条第二号（会社分割に係る部分に限る。）及び第三号、第四十三条、第四十四条、第七章の三、第五十三条第一項（第一号、第五号及び第八号を除く。）、第二項、第三項及び第五項、第五十五条第二項及び第三項、第五十六条第五号から第九号まで、第五十七条並びに第五十七条の二第二項の規定を除く。
    (2) When a Foreign Bank has obtained a license from the Prime Minister as set forth in Article 4, paragraph (1) pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the provisions of this Act shall apply by deeming the Principal Branch Office of the Foreign Bank and any other branch offices or other business offices of that Foreign Bank in Japan (hereinafter referred to as "Secondary Branch Offices of the Foreign Bank" in this Chapter) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Branch Offices of a Foreign Bank" in this Chapter) as a single Bank and deeming that Foreign Bank's representative person in Japan as a director of that Branch Office of the Foreign Bank that has been deemed as a single Bank; provided, however, that this shall exclude the application of provisions of Article 4-2, Article 5, Article 6, Article 7-2, paragraph (4), Article 8, Article 13, paragraphs (2) and (4), Article 14, paragraph (2), Chapter II-2, Article 19, paragraph (2), Article 20, paragraph (2), Article 21, paragraph (2), Article 22, Article 23, Article 24, paragraphs (2) and (3) (limited to the part of these provisions that pertains to Subsidiaries, etc.), Article 25, paragraphs (2) and (5) (limited to the part of these provisions that pertains to Subsidiaries, etc.), Article 30, paragraphs (1) and (2), Articles 32 to 33-2 inclusive, Article 36 (limited to the part that pertains to company split), Article 37, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii), Article 39, Article 40, Article 41, item (ii) (limited to the part that pertains to company split) and item (iii) of that Article, Article 43, Article 44, Chapter VII-3, Article 53, paragraph (1) (excluding items (i), (v) and (viii)), paragraphs (2), (3) and (5) of that Article, Article 55, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 56, items (v) to (ix) inclusive, Article 57 and Article 57-2, paragraph (2).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ２　内閣総理大臣は、少額短期保険業者の業務の健全かつ適切な運営を確保し、保険契約者等の保護を図るため特に必要があると認めるときは、その必要の限度において、当該少額短期保険業者の子法人等（子会社その他少額短期保険業者がその経営を支配している法人として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。次項並びに次条第二項及び第三項において同じ。）又は当該少額短期保険業者から業務の委託を受けた者に対し、当該少額短期保険業者の業務又は財産の状況に関し参考となるべき報告又は資料の提出を求めることができる。
    (2) The Prime Minister may, when he/she finds it particularly necessary to protect Policyholders, etc. by ensuring the sound and appropriate management of a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, request a Subsidiary, etc. of the Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider (referring to a Subsidiary Company or any other juridical person whose management is deemed to be controlled by the Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider under a Cabinet Office Ordinance; the same shall apply in the following paragraph and paragraphs (2) and (3) of the following Article) or any subcontractor of the Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider to submit a report or materials that should serve as reference concerning the condition of the business or property of the Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, within the limit necessary.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第二百七十二条の二十五　内閣総理大臣は、少額短期保険業者の業務若しくは財産又は少額短期保険業者及びその子会社等の財産の状況に照らして、当該少額短期保険業者の業務の健全かつ適切な運営を確保し、保険契約者等の保護を図るため必要があると認めるときは、当該少額短期保険業者に対し、措置を講ずべき事項及び期限を示して、経営の健全性を確保するための改善計画の提出を求め、又は提出された改善計画の変更を命じ、その他監督上必要な措置を命ずることができる。
    Article 272-25 (1) The Prime Minister may, when he/she finds it necessary, in light of the status of the business or property of a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider or the status of the property of its Subsidiary Company, etc., to protect Policyholders, etc. by ensuring the sound and appropriate management of the Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, request the Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider to submit an improvement program for ensuring the soundness of its management by specifying matters for which measures should be taken as well as a time limit or order the modification of the submitted improvement program, or order necessary measures for the purpose of supervision.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ４　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の承認を受けずに同項各号に掲げる取引若しくは行為により少額短期保険業者の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者になった者若しくは少額短期保険業者の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者として設立された会社その他の法人又は第二項ただし書の承認を受けることなく猶予期限日後も少額短期保険業者の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者である者に対し、当該少額短期保険業者の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者でなくなるよう、所要の措置を講ずることを命ずることができる。
    (4) The Prime Minister may order a person who has come to hold voting rights equaling or exceeding the Major Shareholder Threshold in a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider through any of the transactions or acts listed in the items of paragraph (1) or a company or any other juridical person formed as the holder of a number of votes equaling or exceeding the Major Shareholder Threshold in a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, without receiving the approval set forth in paragraph (1), or a person that continues to hold, even after the Grace Deadline, a number of votes equaling or exceeding the Major Shareholder Threshold in a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider without receiving the approval set forth in the proviso to paragraph (2), to take necessary measures for ensuring that it will cease to hold a number of votes equaling or exceeding the Major Shareholder Threshold in the Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第七十八条　新法第百九十五条並びに第百九十六条第二項及び第四項（新法第百九十五条に規定する書類に係る部分に限る。）の規定は、外国保険会社等の施行日以後に終了する事業年度に係る新法第百九十五条に規定する書類について適用し、施行日前に終了した事業年度に係る旧外国保険事業者法第十二条に規定する書類については、なお従前の例による。この場合において、なお従前の例によることとされる同条の規定により同条の書類を提出しなければならない先は、内閣総理大臣とする。
    Article 78 (1) The provisions of Article 195, and Article 196, paragraphs (2) and (4) (limited to the segment pertaining to the documents prescribed in Article 195 of the Current Act) of the Current Act shall apply to the documents prescribed in Article 195 of the Current Act pertaining to the business years of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. that end on or after the Effective Date; with regard to the documents prescribed in Article 12 of the Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act pertaining to the business years that ended before the Effective Date, the provisions then in force shall remain applicable. In this case, those documents set forth in that Article to be submitted pursuant to the provision of that Article to which the provisions then in force shall remain applicable shall be submitted to the Prime Minister.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第九十条　この法律の施行の際現に旧外国保険事業者法の免許を受けた外国保険会社等が新法第百九十九条において準用する新法第百十八条第一項の大蔵省令で定める保険契約に係る旧外国保険事業者法第十三条の責任準備金の金額に対応する財産をその他の財産と区別して経理するための特別の勘定を設けている場合は、当該特別の勘定は、新法第百九十九条において準用する新法第百十八条第一項の規定により設けた特別勘定とみなす。
    Article 90 Where a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. Licensed under the Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act in existence at the time when this Act enters into force has created a Special Account to ensure separate accounting from other property for the property corresponding to the amount of the policy reserve set forth in Article 13 of the Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act pertaining to the insurance contracts set forth in Article 118, paragraph (1) of the Current Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 199 of the Current Act to be specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance, such Special Account shall be deemed as the Special Account created pursuant to the provision of Article 118, paragraph (1) of the Current Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 199 of the Current Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • チ　第六号に規定する法律、会社法若しくはこれらに相当する外国の法令の規定に違反し、又は刑法（明治四十年法律第四十五号）第二百四条、第二百六条、第二百八条、第二百八条の三、第二百二十二条若しくは第二百四十七条の罪、暴力行為等処罰に関する法律（大正十五年法律第六十号）の罪若しくは暴力団員による不当な行為の防止等に関する法律（平成三年法律第七十七号）第四十六条、第四十七条、第四十九条若しくは第五十条の罪を犯し、罰金の刑（これに相当する外国の法令による刑を含む。）に処せられ、その刑の執行を終わり、又はその刑の執行を受けることがなくなった日から五年を経過しない者
    (h) a person who has been sentenced to a fine (including punishment equivalent thereto pursuant to the laws and regulations of a foreign state) for violating the provisions of any of the Acts prescribed in item (vi), the Companies Act, or any laws and regulations of a foreign state that are equivalent thereto, or for committing an offense set forth in Article 204, Article 206, Article 208, Article 208-3, Article 222, or Article 247 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), an offense set forth in the Act on Punishment of Physical Violence and Other Related Matters (Act No. 60 of 1926), or an offense set forth in Article 46, Article 47, Article 49, or Article 50 of the Act to Prevent Unjust Acts by Organized Crime Group Members (Act No. 77 of 1991), and for whom five years have yet to elapse since the day on which execution of the sentence was completed or since the day on which the person has ceased to be subject to execution of the sentence;  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 三　吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（法第七十七条第一項において準用する会社法第四百七十五条（第一号及び第三号を除く。）の規定により清算をする会員商品取引所（以下「清算会員商品取引所」という。）を除く。）において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生ずる日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。）
    (iii) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger (excluding Member Commodity Exchanges which is to be liquidated pursuant to the provisions of Article 475 (excluding item (i) and item (iii)) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph (1) of the Act) (hereinafter such Member Commodity Exchange shall be referred to as a "Liquidating Member Commodity Exchange"), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph (4) of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year);  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ハ　他の新設合併消滅商品取引所において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、他の新設合併消滅商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該他の新設合併消滅商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事業の内容に限る。）
    (c) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in a Consolidation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in a Consolidation-Type Merger) at said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in a Consolidation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph (4) of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by a Consolidation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year);  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 四　当該新設合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所を除く。以下この号において同じ。）において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、当該新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事業の内容に限る。）
    (iv) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in a Consolidation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in a Consolidation-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in a Consolidation-Type Merger (excluding Liquidating Member Commodity Exchanges; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph (4) of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by a Consolidation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year);  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ハ　他の新設合併消滅商品取引所において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、他の新設合併消滅商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該他の新設合併消滅商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の十二第一項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早い日後新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事業の内容に限る。）
    (c) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in a Consolidation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in a Consolidation-Type Merger) at said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in a Consolidation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between the earliest day among those listed in the respective items of Article 144-12, paragraph (1) of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by a Consolidation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year);  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第百二十二条　金融商品取引所は、当該金融商品取引所が発行者である有価証券をその売買のため、又は当該有価証券、当該有価証券に係る金融指標若しくは当該有価証券に係るオプションを市場デリバティブ取引のために取引所金融商品市場その他政令で定める市場（当該金融商品取引所（その子会社である金融商品取引所を含む。）及び当該金融商品取引所の総株主の議決権の百分の五十を超える対象議決権を保有する金融商品取引所が開設する取引所金融商品市場を除く。）に上場しようとするときは、その上場しようとする取引所金融商品市場その他政令で定める市場ごとに、その上場について、内閣総理大臣の承認を受けなければならない。ただし、第百二十五条の規定による命令に基づき上場する場合は、この限りでない。
    Article 122 (1) When a Financial Instruments Exchange intends to list the Securities issued by said Financial Instruments Exchange for the purpose of sales and purchase, or to list said Securities, Financial Indicators pertaining thereto or Options pertaining thereto for the purpose of Market Transactions of Derivatives, on the Financial Instruments Exchange Market or any other market specified by a Cabinet Order (excluding the Financial Instruments Exchange Market established by said Financial Instruments Exchange (including the Financial Instruments Exchange which is its Subsidiary Company) and by the Financial Instruments Exchange which holds the subject voting rights exceeding 50% of the voting rights of all shareholders of said Financial Instruments Exchange), it shall obtain approval on such listing from the Prime Minister, for each Financial Instruments Exchange Market or any other market prescribed by a Cabinet Order subject to said listing; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where such listing is made based on the order given under the provision of Article 125.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第百五十六条の二十九　内閣総理大臣は、証券金融会社の金銭又は有価証券の貸付け（第百五十六条の二十四第一項に規定する業務に係るものに限る。）の方法又は条件について、これらが一般の経済状況にかんがみて適正を欠くに至つたと認められる場合又は取引所金融商品市場若しくは店頭売買有価証券市場に不健全な取引の傾向がある場合において、取引所金融商品市場若しくは店頭売買有価証券市場における売買を公正にし、又は有価証券の流通を円滑にするために特に必要があると認めるときは、その変更を命ずることができる。この場合においては、行政手続法第十三条第一項の規定による意見陳述のための手続の区分にかかわらず、聴聞を行わなければならない。
    Article 156-29 The Prime Minister may issue an order to change the methods or conditions under which a Securities Finance Company lends money or Securities (limited to those pertaining to the business prescribed in Article 156-24(1)), when it is deemed that said methods or conditions have become inappropriate in light of general economic conditions, or when there is an unsound tendency of transactions in a Financial Instruments Exchange Market or the Over-the-Counter Securities Market, and if he/she finds it especially necessary for facilitating fair sales and purchase in a Financial Instruments Exchange Market or an Over-the-Counter Securities Market as well as for achieving smooth distribution of Securities. In this case, a hearing shall be held irrespective of the categories of procedures for hearing statements of opinion under Article 13(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第百九十三条の二　金融商品取引所に上場されている有価証券の発行会社その他の者で政令で定めるものが、この法律の規定により提出する貸借対照表、損益計算書その他の財務計算に関する書類で内閣府令で定めるものには、その者と特別の利害関係のない公認会計士又は監査法人の監査証明を受けなければならない。ただし、監査証明を受けなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けた場合は、この限りでない。
    Article 193-2 (1) A balance sheet, profit and loss statement and other statements on finance and accounting as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance which shall be submitted under the provisions of this Act by an issuer company of Securities listed on a Financial Instruments Exchange or any other person specified by a Cabinet Order shall require an audit certification by a certified public accountant or audit firm that has no special interest in said company or person; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where said company or person has obtained an approval from the Prime Minister pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance as cases where omission of an audit certification will not impair the public interest or protection of investors.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ２　内閣総理大臣は、会社その他の者の同一の会計期間に係る財務書類の二以上の証明について前項の決定（第三十一条の二第一項の規定に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）をしなければならない場合には、同条第一項の規定による額に代えて、それぞれの決定に係る事実について同項の規定により計算した額（以下この項及び次項において「個別決定ごとの算出額」という。）のうち最も高い額を内閣府令で定めるところにより当該個別決定ごとの算出額に応じてあん分して得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。
    (2) The Prime Minister shall, in the case where he/she must render a decision set forth in the preceding paragraph (limited to that pertaining to the provisions of Article 31-2(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) for two or more attestations of financial documents pertaining to the same accounting period of a company or any other person, render a decision ordering the respondent to pay to the Treasury, in lieu of the amount under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article, a surcharge of an amount corresponding to the amount obtained by dividing proportionately the highest of the amounts calculated pursuant to the provisions of the same paragraph for the facts pertaining to the respective decisions (hereinafter referred to as the "amounts calculated for the individual decisions" in this paragraph and the following paragraph) in accordance with said amounts calculated for the individual decisions, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ４　内閣総理大臣は、会社その他の者の同一の会計期間に係る財務書類の二以上の証明について第一項の決定（第三十四条の二十一の二第一項の規定に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）をしなければならない場合には、同条第一項の規定による額に代えて、それぞれの決定に係る事実について同項の規定により計算した額（以下この項及び次項において「個別決定ごとの算出額」という。）のうち最も高い額を内閣府令で定めるところにより当該個別決定ごとの算出額に応じてあん分して得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。
    (4) The Prime Minister shall, in the case where he/she must render a decision set forth in paragraph (1) (limited to that pertaining to the provisions of Article 34-21-2(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) on two or more attestations of financial documents pertaining to the same accounting period of a company or any other person, render a decision ordering the respondent to pay to the Treasury, in lieu of the amount under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the same Article, a surcharge of an amount corresponding to the amount obtained by dividing proportionately the highest of the amounts calculated pursuant to the provisions of the same paragraph for the facts pertaining to the respective decisions (hereinafter referred to as the "amounts calculated for the individual decisions" in this paragraph and the following paragraph) in accordance with said amounts calculated for the individual decisions, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ３　会社法第五百条から第五百三条までの規定は、清算投資法人の債務の弁済について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百条第一項及び第二項中「前条第一項」とあり、及び同法第五百三条第一項中「第四百九十九条第一項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十七条第一項」と、同法第五百条第二項及び第五百一条第一項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣（特別清算が開始された場合にあっては、裁判所）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。
    (3) The provisions of Article 500 through Article 503 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the performance of its obligations by an Investment Corporation in Liquidation. In this case, the phrases "paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 500, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of that Act and "paragraph (1) of Article 499" in Article 503, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 157, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "the court" in Article 500, paragraph (2) and Article 501, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister (or the court in cases when a special liquidation is commenced)," and any other technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ２　内閣総理大臣は、銀行の業務の健全かつ適切な運営を確保するため特に必要があると認めるときは、その必要の限度において、当該銀行の子法人等（子会社その他銀行がその経営を支配している法人として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。次項、次条第二項及び第五項並びに第四十七条第二項において同じ。）又は当該銀行から業務の委託を受けた者（前項の銀行代理業者を除く。次項並びに次条第二項及び第五項において同じ。）に対し、当該銀行の業務又は財産の状況に関し参考となるべき報告又は資料の提出を求めることができる。
    (2) The Prime Minister may, when and to the extent that he/she finds it particularly necessary for ensuring sound and appropriate management of the business of a Bank, require a Subsidiary, etc. of said Bank (meaning a Subsidiary Company or any other entity that is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a juridical person of which management is controlled by that Bank; the same shall apply in the following paragraph, paragraph (2) of the following Article and (5) and Article 47(2)) or a person to whom business has been entrusted by that Bank (excluding the Bank Agent set forth in the preceding paragraph; the same shall apply in the following paragraph and paragraph (2) of the following Article and (5)) to submit reports or materials that would helpful to understand the status of the business or property of said Bank.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第二十六条　内閣総理大臣は、銀行の業務若しくは財産又は銀行及びその子会社等の財産の状況に照らして、当該銀行の業務の健全かつ適切な運営を確保するため必要があると認めるときは、当該銀行に対し、措置を講ずべき事項及び期限を示して、当該銀行の経営の健全性を確保するための改善計画の提出を求め、若しくは提出された改善計画の変更を命じ、又はその必要の限度において、期限を付して当該銀行の業務の全部若しくは一部の停止を命じ、若しくは当該銀行の財産の供託その他監督上必要な措置を命ずることができる。
    Article 26 (1) The Prime Minister may, when he/she finds it necessary for ensuring sound and appropriate management of the business of a Bank in light of the status of the business or property of that Bank or the property of that Bank and its Subsidiary Companies, etc., request that Bank to submit an improvement plan for ensuring soundness in management of that Bank or order a change to the submitted improvement plan by designating the matters and the time limit for which measures should be taken, or, within the limit necessary, order suspension of the whole or part of the business of that Bank by setting a time limit or order deposit of property of that Bank or other measures necessary for the purpose of supervision.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 第五十条　第四十九条第一項第三号から第六号までのいずれかに該当して同項の規定による届出（同項第三号に係る届出にあつては当該合併後当該外国銀行支店に係る外国銀行が消滅することとなる合併、当該外国銀行支店に係る事業の全部を承継させることとなる会社分割及び事業の全部の譲渡に係る届出に限るものとし、同項第四号に係る届出にあつては銀行業の一部の廃止に係る届出を除く。）があつたときは、当該届出をした外国銀行支店に係る外国銀行に対する第四条第一項の内閣総理大臣の免許は、効力を失う。
    Article 50 When a Foreign Bank Branch has given a notification under Article 49(1) due to falling under any of the categories set forth in Article 49(1)(iii) to (vi) inclusive (with regard to a notification pertaining to item (iii) of that paragraph, it shall be limited to a notification pertaining to a Merger resulting in extinction of the Foreign Bank to which said Foreign Bank Branch belongs, a company split resulting in succession of all of the business pertaining to said Foreign Bank Branch, or transfer of all of the business, and with regard to a notification pertaining to item (iv) of that paragraph, it shall exclude a notification pertaining to partial abolition of the Banking Business), the license from the Prime Minister set forth in Article 4(1) for the Foreign Bank to which to the Foreign Bank Branch that has given that notification belongs shall lose its effect.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • ４　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の認可を受けずに同項各号に掲げる取引若しくは行為により銀行の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者になつた者若しくは銀行の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者として設立された会社その他の法人又は第二項ただし書の認可を受けることなく猶予期限日後も銀行の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者である者に対し、当該銀行の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者でなくなるよう、所要の措置を講ずることを命ずることができる。
    (4) The Prime Minister may order a person who became a holder of voting rights of a Bank which amounts to the Major Shareholder Threshold or more or a company or any other juridical person established as a holder of voting rights of a Bank which amounts to the Major Shareholder Threshold or more through any of the transactions or acts listed in each item of paragraph (1) without obtaining the authorization set forth in that paragraph or a person who remains as a holder of voting rights of a Bank which amounts to the Major Shareholder Threshold or more even after the Last Day of the Grace Period without obtaining the authorization set forth in the proviso to paragraph (2), to take necessary measures for becoming a person who is no longer a holder of voting rights of the Bank which amounts to the Major Shareholder Threshold or more.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 株券電子化については我が国の金融・資本市場全体の信頼性・効率性を高める上で非常に重要なステップであって、これをタイムリーに確実に実施していくということは金融庁にとっても非常に優先順位の高い課題であると位置づけているところでございまして、この点についての揺らぎはないということでございます。このことを大きな混乱なく着実に実施に移していくために、金融庁、業界団体、そして直接この業務を取り扱うセンターである証券保管振替機構、更には具体的に口座管理していただいている証券会社等が緊密な連携をとりあいながら、様々なチェック項目もつぶしていきながら準備を進めているという状況でございます。
    The shift to a paperless stock certificate system is a very important step toward increasing the reliability and efficiency of Japan's financial and capital markets as a whole, so the FSA puts very high priority on making sure to implement the shift, and our stance on this point will remain steadfast. In order to steadily implement the shift without any major disruption, the FSA, industry groups and the Japan Securities Depository Center, which directly handles paperless stock certificates, as well as securities companies that manage accounts, are closely cooperating with each other in examining check items and making preparations.  - 金融庁
＜前へ 1 2 .... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 次へ＞

例文データの著作権について