「Significantly」を含む例文一覧(4891)
＜前へ 1 2 .... 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98- (3) In the case where the Designated Resources-Saving Business Operator that has received a recommendation prescribed in paragraph 1 does not take any measures pertaining to the recommendation without justifiable grounds even after the competent minister has publicized, pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph, that the Designated Resources-Saving Business Operator has not followed the recommendation, the competent minister may, when he/she finds that Reduction of Generation of By-products, etc. pertaining to the Designated Resources-Saving Industry to be significantly affected, order the Designated Resources-Saving Business Operator to take measures pertaining to the recommendation, after hearing opinions of Councils, etc. (which means organs prescribed in Article 8 of the National Administrative Organization Act (Act No. 120 of 1948)) specified by Cabinet Order.
３ 主務大臣は、第一項に規定する勧告を受けた特定省資源事業者が、前項の規定によりその勧告に従わなかった旨を公表された後において、なお、正当な理由がなくてその勧告に係る措置をとらなかった場合において、当該特定省資源業種に係る副産物の発生抑制等を著しく害すると認めるときは、審議会等（国家行政組織法（昭和二十三年法律第百二十号）第八条に規定する機関をいう。以下同じ。）で政令で定めるものの意見を聴いて、当該特定省資源事業者に対し、その勧告に係る措置をとるべきことを命ずることができる。 - 経済産業省 - (1) The competent minister may, when he/she finds the manner in which a Specified Reuse-Promotion Business Operator whose production quantity or sales volume of a Specified Reuse-Promoted Product meets the requirements specified by Cabinet Order utilizes Recyclable Resources or Reusable Parts pertaining to the Specified Reuse-Promoted Product to be significantly lacking in light of the standards of judgment prescribed in Article 21, paragraph 1, recommend the Specified Reuse-Promotion Business Operator to take necessary measures for the promotion of utilization of Recyclable Resources or Reusable Parts pertaining to the Specified Reuse-Promoted Product, while presenting the grounds for his/her judgment.
主務大臣は、指定再利用促進事業者であって、その製造又は販売に係る指定再利用促進製品の生産量又は販売量が政令で定める要件に該当するものの当該指定再利用促進製品に係る再生資源又は再生部品の利用の促進が第二十一条第一項に規定する判断の基準となるべき事項に照らして著しく不十分であると認めるときは、当該指定再利用促進事業者に対し、その判断の根拠を示して、当該指定再利用促進製品に係る再生資源又は再生部品の利用の促進に関し必要な措置をとるべき旨の勧告をすることができる。 - 経済産業省 - 22.1. Discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods, and in the case of drugs and medicines, the mere discovery of a new form or new property of a known substance which does not result in the enhancement of the known efficacy of that substance, or the mere discovery of any new property or new use for a known substance, or the mere use of a known process unless such known process results in a new product that employs at least one new reactant. For the purpose of this clause, salts, esters, ethers, polymorphs, metabolites, pure form, particle size, isomers, mixtures of isomers, complexes, combinations, and other derivatives of a known substance shall be considered to be the same substance, unless they differ significantly in properties with regard to efficacy;
22.1発見，科学の理論及び数学の方法並びに薬剤製品に関して，既知物質の新たな形式若しくは性質であって，当該物質の既知の効力の向上をもたらさないものの発見にすぎないもの，既知物質の何らかの新たな性質若しくは新たな用途の発見にすぎないもの，又は既知方法の使用にすぎないもの。ただし，当該既知方法が少なくとも一種の新たな反応物を含む新たな製品を製造できる場合はこの限りではない。 本条において，既知物質の塩，エステル，エテール，多形体，代謝物，純物質，粒度，異性体，異性体混合物，複体，結合体及び他の誘導体は，同じ物質であるものとする。ただし，効力の点で顕著な相違を有する物質はこの限りではない。 - 特許庁 - Article 33 (1) The competent minister may, when he/she finds the manner in which a Specified Resources-Recycling Business Operator whose production quantity or sales volume of a Specified Resources-Recycled Product or a product specified by Cabinet Order under Article 26, paragraph 1 that uses a Specified Resources-Recycled Product as its part meets the requirements specified by Cabinet Order implements the Voluntary Collection and Recycling of the Specified Resources-Recycled Product to be significantly lacking in light of the standards of judgment prescribed in the said paragraph, recommend the Specified Resources-Recycling Business Operator to take necessary measures for the Voluntary Collection and Recycling of the Specified Resources-Recycled Product, while presenting the grounds for his/her judgment.
第三十三条 主務大臣は、指定再資源化事業者であって、その製造若しくは販売に係る指定再資源化製品又は指定再資源化製品を部品として使用する第二十六条第一項の政令で定める製品の生産量若しくは販売量が政令で定める要件に該当するものの当該使用済指定再資源化製品の自主回収及び再資源化が同項に規定する判断の基準となるべき事項に照らして著しく不十分であると認めるときは、当該指定再資源化事業者に対し、その判断の根拠を示して、当該使用済指定再資源化製品の自主回収及び再資源化に関し必要な措置をとるべき旨の勧告をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (1) The competent minister may, when he/she finds the manner in which a Specified Resources-Recycling Business Operator whose production quantity or sales volume of a Specified Resources-Recycled Product or a product specified by Cabinet Order under Article 26, paragraph 1 that uses a Specified Resources-Recycled Product as its part meets the requirements specified by Cabinet Order implements the Voluntary Collection and Recycling of the Specified Resources-Recycled Product to be significantly lacking in light of the standards of judgment prescribed in the said paragraph, recommend the Specified Resources-Recycling Business Operator to take necessary measures for the Voluntary Collection and Recycling of the Specified Resources-Recycled Product, while presenting the grounds for his/her judgment.
主務大臣は、指定再資源化事業者であって、その製造若しくは販売に係る指定再資源化製品又は指定再資源化製品を部品として使用する第二十六条第一項の政令で定める製品の生産量若しくは販売量が政令で定める要件に該当するものの当該使用済指定再資源化製品の自主回収及び再資源化が同項に規定する判断の基準となるべき事項に照らして著しく不十分であると認めるときは、当該指定再資源化事業者に対し、その判断の根拠を示して、当該使用済指定再資源化製品の自主回収及び再資源化に関し必要な措置をとるべき旨の勧告をすることができる。 - 経済産業省 - In order to counter the impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake, the period for repayment of loans received under the program since March 11, 2011, will be increased from seven years to nine years for borrowers that have been significantly affected by the earthquake under Article 129 of the Act on Special Fiscal Aid and Subsidy for Recovery from the Great East Japan Earthquake (Act No. 40, 2011; referred to below as the Special Fiscal Aid Act). Under the Act on Partial Revision of the Act on Temporary Special Provisions of Acts Related to National Tax, in Relation to Victims, etc. of the Great East Japan Earthquake, exemptions from stamp duty will be permitted for businesses specified under Article 129 of the Special Fiscal Aid Act where such businesses have entered contracts for monetary loans using equipment funding programs to rebuild facilities. (Continuation) (See p. 188.)
東日本大震災に対処するため、「東日本大震災に対処するための特別の財政援助及び助成に関する法律（平成23 年法律第40 号、以下「東日本大震災特財法」という）第129 条により、震災で著しい被害を受けた者について、平成23 年3 月11 日以降の制度利用にかかる償還期間を7 年から9 年に延長するとともに、「東日本大震災の被災者等に係る国税関係法律の臨時特例に関する法律の一部を改正する法律」により、東日本大震災特財法第129 条による者が設備復興のために設備導入資金事業を利用し金銭消費賃借契約を締結する場合は、当該事業者に係る印紙税を免税する。（継続）（p.188参照） - 経済産業省 - The three very important missions of the Financial Services Agency (FSA) are to prevent the financial sector from being struck by systemic risks-Japan was nearly hit by a systemic risk more than 10 years ago-both in Japan and abroad, to facilitate financing, and to protect users. As you know, the global financial system has destabilized significantly since the Lehman shock, which occurred three years ago. Therefore, with such things in mind, we will perform our duties properly. In particular, Japan announced last year that it would extend the SME Financing Facilitation Act (Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc.) for one year and we believe that we must facilitate financing for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) under the present circumstances.
金融庁の使命というのは、まさにシステミックリスクに、日本も世界も金融がそういうことにならないように、一時、日本は十数年前になりかけましたけれども、そういったことと、それから金融の円滑化ですね、それからまた利用者の保護ということが、金融庁の3つの大変大事な眼目でございますから、そういうことを念頭に置きながら、もう皆様方ご存じのように、3年前のリーマン・ブラザーズ・ショック以来、世界の金融も非常に不安定になってきておりますから、そういったことをきちっと右目と左目で見ながら、特に日本の場合は中小企業金融円滑化法、これを昨年1年延長するということを公表させていただきましたが、やっぱり今のような状態で中小企業の金融を円滑化させねばならない。 - 金融庁 - Article 65 With regard to a worker who engages in a workplace located in a place designated by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare as a region requiring curtailment of the activities in winter and work designated by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare as work requiring outdoor performance and causing the worker difficulties to engage in winter because of its nature in a workplace located in a region designated by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare as a region with significantly high snow accumulation, daily working hours and weekly working hours set forth in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare pursuant to paragraph (3) of Article 32-4 of the Act shall be limited to 10 hours and 52 hours respectively for the time being, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (4) of Article 12-4.
第六十五条 積雪の度が著しく高い地域として厚生労働大臣が指定する地域に所在する事業場において、冬期に当該地域における事業活動の縮小を余儀なくされる事業として厚生労働大臣が指定する事業に従事する労働者であつて、屋外で作業を行う必要がある業務であつて業務の性質上冬期に労働者が従事することが困難であるものとして厚生労働大臣が指定する業務に従事するものについては、第十二条の四第四項の規定にかかわらず、当分の間、法第三十二条の四第三項の厚生労働省令で定める一日の労働時間の限度は十時間とし、一週間の労働時間の限度は五十二時間とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 63 (1) In the event that the fares and charges of the general motor truck transportation business are likely to significantly soar or drop by the imbalance between the supplied transportation capacity and the transportation demand or by fluctuation of prices and other economic conditions in a certain area (between specific sections for fares and charges pertaining to the special loading motor truck transportation of LTL, hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), when it is found necessary in maintaining the public convenience or ensuring sound management of the general motor truck transportation business operator in the said specific area, the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism may designate the said specific area and determine the standard fares and standard charges for a specified period based on the fair cost and fair profit under efficient management of the general motor truck transportation business.
第六十三条 国土交通大臣は、特定の地域（特別積合せ貨物運送に係る運賃及び料金にあっては、特定の地域間。以下この項において同じ。）において、一般貨物自動車運送事業に係る運賃及び料金がその供給輸送力及び輸送需要量の不均衡又は物価その他の経済事情の変動により著しく高騰し、又は下落するおそれがある場合において、公衆の利便又は一般貨物自動車運送事業の健全な運営を確保するため特に必要があると認めるときは、当該特定の地域を指定して、一般貨物自動車運送事業の能率的な経営の下における適正な原価及び適正な利潤を基準として、期間を定めて標準運賃及び標準料金を定めることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 135 (1) A Municipality, in a case when notification is issued pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, shall collect all of an insurance premium (in a case as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, a portion of said insurance premium) of said fiscal year that is imposed upon a Primary Insured Person pertaining to said notification (except a person for whom it is determined significantly difficult to pay the insurance premium by the method of special collection due to disaster or other special circumstances; the same shall apply in the following paragraph and paragraph (3)) by the method of special collection, however, provided that an insurance premium may not be collected by the method of special collection in a Municipality that is determined inappropriate to implement special collection due to a limited number of Primary Insured Persons pertaining to said notification or other special circumstances.
第百三十五条 市町村は、前条第一項の規定による通知が行われた場合においては、当該通知に係る第一号被保険者（災害その他の特別の事情があることにより、特別徴収の方法によって保険料を徴収することが著しく困難であると認めるものを除く。次項及び第三項において同じ。）に対して課する当該年度の保険料の全部（厚生労働省令で定める場合にあっては、その一部）を、特別徴収の方法によって徴収するものとする。ただし、当該通知に係る第一号被保険者が少ないことその他の特別の事情があることにより、特別徴収を行うことが適当でないと認められる市町村においては、特別徴収の方法によらないことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 12 (1) Where with regard to the following documents, etc., prima facie showing is made to the effect that the documents, etc. in question contain such part that is likely to be significantly detrimental to the administration or realization of the bankruptcy estate (prior to the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, the debtor's property) if it is subject to the inspection or copying, issuance of an authenticated copy, transcript or extract or reproduction (hereinafter referred to as "inspection, etc." in this Article) conducted by an interested person (such part of documents, etc. shall hereinafter be referred to as "detrimental part" in this Article), the court, upon the petition of a bankruptcy trustee or provisional administrator who submitted the documents, etc. in question, may limit persons who may make a request for inspection, etc. of the detrimental part to the person who has filed the petition (in cases where the petition has been filed by a provisional administrator, the provisional administrator or a bankruptcy trustee; the same shall apply in the following paragraph):
第十二条 次に掲げる文書等について、利害関係人がその閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又はその複製（以下この条において「閲覧等」という。）を行うことにより、破産財団（破産手続開始前にあっては、債務者の財産）の管理又は換価に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある部分（以下この条において「支障部分」という。）があることにつき疎明があった場合には、裁判所は、当該文書等を提出した破産管財人又は保全管理人の申立てにより、支障部分の閲覧等の請求をすることができる者を、当該申立てをした者（その者が保全管理人である場合にあっては、保全管理人又は破産管財人。次項において同じ。）に限ることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Nor do I believe that creating huge banks and insurance companies is necessary for the Japanese economy or for the people's lives. As I have been saying, we will reform the postal businesses because we believe that we must not allow the privatization carried out by the former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi to significantly undermine the mission performed since the Meiji Era for the sake of the country and local communities by the postal businesses, which used to be essential to the people's lives. Therefore, as I have said over and over again, our basic stance is that the postal businesses should start over as an organization capable of fulfilling the social functions that Japan Post has assumed since the Meiji Era, rather than pursuing acting as a pure financial institution. Our cabinet resolution (on October 20) has also set forth such a direction.
問題は、もう前から言っているように、ある意味で国民生活にとって不可欠な郵政事業が、明治以来担っていた国家や地域社会に対しての任務が、純ちゃん（小泉純一郎 元総理）のああいう民営化によって、極端に損なわれていくということがあってはならないということから見直しをやるわけですから、何度も言うように、そういう意味で、郵政事業が金融機関としてやる、金融機関プロパーとしての存在意義というよりも、むしろ従来、明治以来担ってきた日本郵政の社会的責任みたいなものを、もう一度果たしてもらえる組織として、今後、出発してもらいたいというのが、我々の基本的な考え方ですし、閣議決定した方向も、そういう方向になっているわけですから。 - 金融庁 - In order to counter the impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake, the period for repayment of loans received under the program since March 11, 2011, was increased from seven years to nine years for borrowers that had been significantly affected by the earthquake under Article 129 of the Act on Special Fiscal Aid and Subsidy for Recovery from the Great East Japan Earthquake (Act No. 40, 2011; referred to below as the Special Fiscal Aid Act). Under the Act on Partial Revision of the Act on Temporary Special Provisions of Acts Related to National Tax, in Relation to Victims, etc. of the Great East Japan Earthquake (Act No. 29, 2011; referred to below as the Earthquake Special Provisions Act), exemptions from stamp duty were introduced for businesses specified under Article 129 of the Special Fiscal Aid Act where such businesses have entered contracts for monetary loans using equipment funding programs to rebuild facilities.
東日本大震災に対処するため、東日本大震災に対処するための特別の財政援助及び助成に関する法律（平成23 年法律第40 号、以下「東日本大震災特財法」という）第129 条により、震災で著しい被害を受けた者について、平成23年3 月11日以降の制度利用に係る償還期間を7年から9年に延長するとともに、東日本大震災の被災者等に係る国税関係法律の臨時特例に関する法律の一部を改正する法律（平成23年法律第29号、以下「震災特例法」という）により、東日本大震災特財法第129条による者が、設備復興のために設備導入資金事業を利用し金銭消費賃借契約を締結する場合は、当該事業者に係る印紙税の免税措置を講じた。 - 経済産業省 - Many SMEs that would not have gone bankrupt under normal circumstances went bust, and the rapid credit contraction, credit crunch and credit withdrawal really damaged the economy. If you take this into account, a higher capital adequacy ratio is not necessarily desirable. At the end of the day, the economy consists of macro economies of regional communities. Furthermore, given that economies vary in substance from country to country, it is extremely important that an agreement was reached on the outline of Basel III-awaiting finalization at the Seoul Summit in November-as it is my understanding that Japan, Germany and France were able to significantly take the initiative in shaping the agreement.
たくさんの、普通であれば倒産しなくて済むような中小企業がたくさん倒産をするというようなことでありまして、急速にご存じのように信用収縮、貸し渋り貸しはがしによって、大変経済が本当に傷んだわけでございますから、そういったことを踏まえて、やはり自己資本に関しては、この自己資本比率が高ければ高いほどいいというものでもない。やはりグローバル、やはり経済の、その地域におけるそれぞれのマクロの経済があるわけでございます。また、国によって、色々と経済の実体も違いますから、そういったところで、私は非常にこの世界、今度バーゼル III が一応合意になりましたが、最終的にはまだ、ソウルサミットが11月にありますが、そういった意味で、やはり日本あるいはドイツ、フランスがかなりこれを主導的できたというふうに私は認識をさせていただいておりまして、そういったことが非常に大事なことでございます。 - 金融庁 - Article 17 (1) Where with regard to the following documents, etc., prima facie showing is made to the effect that the documents, etc. in question contain such part that is likely to be significantly detrimental to the maintenance or rehabilitation of the rehabilitation debtor's business or serious damage to the rehabilitation debtor's property if it is subject to the inspection or copying, issuance of an authenticated copy, transcript or extract, or reproduction (hereinafter referred to as "inspection, etc." in this Article) conducted by an interested person (such part of documents, etc. shall hereinafter be referred to as "detrimental part" in this Article), the court, upon the petition of the rehabilitation debtor, etc. (or a provisional administrator if any provisional administrator is appointed; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) who submitted the documents, etc. in question, a supervisor, examiner or individual rehabilitation commissioner, may limit persons who may make a request for inspection, etc. of the detrimental part to the persons who has filed the petition and the rehabilitation debtor, etc.:
第十七条 次に掲げる文書等について、利害関係人がその閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又はその複製（以下この条において「閲覧等」という。）を行うことにより、再生債務者の事業の維持再生に著しい支障を生ずるおそれ又は再生債務者の財産に著しい損害を与えるおそれがある部分（以下この条において「支障部分」という。）があることにつき疎明があった場合には、裁判所は、当該文書等を提出した再生債務者等（保全管理人が選任されている場合にあっては、保全管理人。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）、監督委員、調査委員又は個人再生委員の申立てにより、支障部分の閲覧等の請求をすることができる者を、当該申立てをした者及び再生債務者等に限ることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 14 (1) Where, with regard to the following documents, etc., a prima facie showing is made to the effect that the documents, etc. in question contain a part that is likely to be significantly detrimental to the achievement of the purpose of recognition and assistance proceedings if it is subject to inspection or copying, issuance of an authenticated copy, transcript or extract or reproduction (hereinafter referred to as "inspection, etc." in this Article) (such part of the documents, etc. shall hereinafter be referred to as a "detrimental part" in this Article) by an interested person, the court may, upon petition by the debtor, foreign trustee, recognition trustee (including a recognition trustee representative; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) or provisional administrator (including a provisional administrator representative; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) who submitted the documents, etc. in question, limit persons who may request inspection, etc. of the detrimental part to the person who has filed the petition, foreign trustee, etc., recognition trustee and provisional administrator:
第十四条 次に掲げる文書等について、利害関係人がその閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又はその複製（以下この条において「閲覧等」という。）を行うことにより、承認援助手続の目的の達成に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある部分（以下この条において「支障部分」という。）があることにつき疎明があった場合には、裁判所は、当該文書等を提出した債務者、外国管財人、承認管財人（承認管財人代理を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）又は保全管理人（保全管理人代理を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の申立てにより、支障部分の閲覧等の請求をすることができる者を、当該申立てをした者、外国管財人等、承認管財人及び保全管理人に限ることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - 4. It is necessary to further strengthen countermeasures at the onset of an outbreak, and to develop a system to collect/ provide /communicate/disclose information in the pre-pandemic phase. For this purpose, it is essential to strengthen the institutional capacity and human resources of the Ministry and the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID; the Infectious Diseases Surveillance Center and the Influenza Virus Research Center, in particular), quarantine stations, public health centers and prefectural/city institutes of public health (hereafter, the Institutes). The government needs to significantly improve risk management skills specialized in infectious diseases through strengthening staff structures and individual capacities at these institutions. It is also necessary to determine future roles and the division of labor to clarify relationships among relevant institutions and organizations mentioned above. Particularly, the NIID should be better organized and staffed by reference to the US Centers for Disease Control (US-CDC) and other international organizations in charge of infectious diseases.
４． 発生前の段階からの情報収集・情報提供体制の構築や収集した情報の公開、発生時の対応を一層強化することが必要であり、このため、厚生労働省のみならず、国立感染症研究所（感染症情報センターやインフルエンザウイルス研究センターを中心に）や、検疫所などの機関、地方自治体の保健所や地方衛生研究所を含めた感染症対策に関わる危機管理を専門に担う組織や人員体制の大幅な強化、人材の育成を進めるとともに、関係機関のあり方や相互の役割分担、関係の明確化等が必要である。特に国立感染症研究所については、米国ＣＤＣ（疾病予防管理センター）を始め各国の感染症を担当する機関を参考にして、より良い組織や人員体制を構築すべきである。 - 厚生労働省 - Article 27-11 (1) A Tender Offeror may not withdraw offers or cancel contracts pertaining to the Tender Offer (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Withdrawal, etc. of Tender Offer") after having once made the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer; provided, however, that this shall not apply in cases where the Tender Offeror states as one of the Terms of Purchase, etc. in the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer and Tender Offer Notification that the Tender Offer may be withdrawn if there occurs any important change in the business or property of the Issuer of the Share Certificates, etc. for which the Tender Offer is made or its Subsidiary (meaning Subsidiary as defined in Article 2(iii) of the Companies Act) or there occurs any other circumstance that would significantly impede the achievement of the purpose of the Tender Offer (limited to those specified by a Cabinet Order), or where a decision of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings is made against the Tender Offeror or there occurs any other material change in circumstances as specified by a Cabinet Order.
第二十七条の十一 公開買付者は、公開買付開始公告をした後においては、公開買付けに係る申込みの撤回及び契約の解除（以下この節において「公開買付けの撤回等」という。）を行うことができない。ただし、公開買付者が公開買付開始公告及び公開買付届出書において公開買付けに係る株券等の発行者若しくはその子会社（会社法第二条第三号に規定する子会社をいう。）の業務若しくは財産に関する重要な変更その他の公開買付けの目的の達成に重大な支障となる事情（政令で定めるものに限る。）が生じたときは公開買付けの撤回等をすることがある旨の条件を付した場合又は公開買付者に関し破産手続開始の決定その他の政令で定める重要な事情の変更が生じた場合には、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - 4. Each Member shall: (a) within 12 months from the date on which the WTO Agreement takes effect for it, inform the Council for Trade in Services of its existing recognition measures and state whether such measures are based on agreements or arrangements of the type referred to in paragraph 1; (b) promptly inform the Council for Trade in Services as far in advance as possible of the opening of negotiations on an agreement or arrangement of the type referred to in paragraph 1 in order to provide adequate opportunity to any other Member to indicate their interest in participating in the negotiations before they enter a substantive phase; (c) promptly inform the Council for Trade in Services when it adopts new recognition measures or significantly modifies existing ones and state whether the measures are based on an agreement or arrangement of the type referred to in paragraph 1.
4. 加盟国は、次のことを行う。 (ａ) 世界貿易機関協定が自国について効力を生ずる日から十二箇月以内に、承認のための現行の措置をサービスの貿易に関する理事会に通報し、及び当該措置が1に規定する協定又は取決めに基づくものであるかどうかを表明すること。 (ｂ) 1に規定する協定又は取決めの交渉が実質的な段階に入る前に他の加盟国が当該交渉に参加することについての関心を示すための機会を十分に与えるため、当該交渉の開始をできる限り早期にサービスの貿易に関する理事会に対して速やかに通報すること。 (ｃ) 承認のための新たな措置を採用し又は承認のための現行の措置の重大な修正を行った場合には、当該措置をサービスの貿易に関する理事会に対して速やかに通報し、及び当該措置が1に規定する協定又は取決めに基づくものであるかどうかを表明すること。 - 経済産業省 - In relation to the second pillar, in order to deal with the global financial crisis triggered by the subprime mortgage problem, we analyzed this problem in an early stage and concentrate our administrative resources on tackling it. In doing so, we identified and analyzed its impact on Japan's financial system and acted carefully to prevent the system from being destabilized by the failures of major financial institutions in the United States and Europe. In addition, we took various measures to facilitate financing and support the real economy in light of Japan's unique situation; Japan's real economy was significantly damaged while its financial sector was relatively sound. Moreover, as the crisis was global, we substantially enhanced cooperation and communications with foreign authorities and held a supervisory college meeting.
それから、今の第二の柱との関係では、サブプライム・ローン問題に端を発するグローバルな金融危機への対応の中で、この問題の分析を早い段階で行い、この問題に対して重点的に行政資源の投入を行った、その中で、我が国金融システムへの影響を把握・分析する、あるいは、欧米で発生した大手金融機関の破綻など、そういった出来事に対しても、それが我が国の金融システムを不安定化させることがないように注意深い対応に努めた、さらには、金融セクターそのものは、我が国の場合相対的に健全ですけれども、実体経済が大きなダメージを受けていたという、この我が国特有の状況も踏まえまして、金融の円滑化、実体経済を支える金融と、そういう観点からの各般の措置を講じたといったこともございましたし、また国際的な広がりのある問題でございますので、海外当局との連携・意思疎通が格段に強化され、密度の高いものになった、その中で、監督カレッジの開催なども行われたといったことがあったかと思います。 - 金融庁 - Article 105-7 (1) When a party, etc., to litigation concerning the infringement of a patent right or exclusive license is to be examined as a party to the litigation, as its statutory representative or as a witness, with regard to matters that will be a basis for the determination of the existence or non-existence of the said infringement, and such matters are trade secrets possessed by a party, the court may, by a ruling, elect to hold closed examinations of such matters where the court, upon the unanimous consent of all judges, finds that the parties, etc. will be unable to make sufficient statements regarding the matters due to the obvious fact that making statements regarding the matters at an open examination will significantly interfere with the business activities of the party based on such trade secrets and that, without such statements, a proper decision on the fact of the existence or non-existence of the infringement of a patent right or exclusive license that ought to be made based on the said matters may not be made based solely on other evidence.
第百五条の七 特許権又は専用実施権の侵害に係る訴訟における当事者等が、その侵害の有無についての判断の基礎となる事項であつて当事者の保有する営業秘密に該当するものについて、当事者本人若しくは法定代理人又は証人として尋問を受ける場合においては、裁判所は、裁判官の全員一致により、その当事者等が公開の法廷で当該事項について陳述をすることにより当該営業秘密に基づく当事者の事業活動に著しい支障を生ずることが明らかであることから当該事項について十分な陳述をすることができず、かつ、当該陳述を欠くことにより他の証拠のみによつては当該事項を判断の基礎とすべき特許権又は専用実施権の侵害の有無についての適正な裁判をすることができないと認めるときは、決定で、当該事項の尋問を公開しないで行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 13 (1) In a lawsuit for the infringement of business interests by unfair competition, where a party, etc. is to be examined as a party itself or a legal representative or as a witness with regard to a matter that serves as the basis for determining the presence or absence of the infringement and falls under a trade secret held by the party, and when the court, by the unanimous consent of the judges, finds that the party, etc. is unable to give sufficient statements regarding the matter because it is clear that giving statements regarding the matter in open court will significantly hinder the party's business activities that are based on the trade secret, and that, without said statements by the party, the court is unable to make an appropriate decision on the presence or absence of infringement on business interests by unfair competition which should be made based on the determination of said matter, it may conduct the examination on the matter in camera by means of a ruling.
第十三条 不正競争による営業上の利益の侵害に係る訴訟における当事者等が、その侵害の有無についての判断の基礎となる事項であって当事者の保有する営業秘密に該当するものについて、当事者本人若しくは法定代理人又は証人として尋問を受ける場合においては、裁判所は、裁判官の全員一致により、その当事者等が公開の法廷で当該事項について陳述をすることにより当該営業秘密に基づく当事者の事業活動に著しい支障を生ずることが明らかであることから当該事項について十分な陳述をすることができず、かつ、当該陳述を欠くことにより他の証拠のみによっては当該事項を判断の基礎とすべき不正競争による営業上の利益の侵害の有無についての適正な裁判をすることができないと認めるときは、決定で、当該事項の尋問を公開しないで行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 43 (1) When a party, etc., to litigation pertaining to the infringement of a patent right or exclusive exploitation right is to be examined as a party to the litigation, its statutory representative or a witness, with pertaining to matters that will be a basis for the determination of the existence or non-existence of the said infringement, and such matters are trade secrets possessed by a party, the court may, by a ruling, elect to hold closed examinations of such matters where the court, upon the unanimous consent of all judges, finds that the parties, etc. will be unable to make sufficient statements regarding the matters due to the obvious fact that making statements regarding the matters at an open examination will significantly interfere with the business activities of the party based on such trade secrets and that, without such statements, a proper decision on the fact of the existence or non-existence of the infringement of a patent right or exclusive exploitation right that ought to be made based on the said matters may not be made based solely on other evidence.
第四十三条 育成者権又は専用利用権の侵害に係る訴訟における当事者等が、その侵害の有無についての判断の基礎となる事項であって当事者の保有する営業秘密に該当するものについて、当事者本人若しくは法定代理人又は証人として尋問を受ける場合においては、裁判所は、裁判官の全員一致により、その当事者等が公開の法廷で当該事項について陳述をすることにより当該営業秘密に基づく当事者の事業活動に著しい支障を生ずることが明らかであることから当該事項について十分な陳述をすることができず、かつ、当該陳述を欠くことにより他の証拠のみによっては当該事項を判断の基礎とすべき育成者権又は専用利用権の侵害の有無についての適正な裁判をすることができないと認めるときは、決定で、当該事項の尋問を公開しないで行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) The Government may, when it finds that if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation was to cover the costs of Financial Assistance and other activities pertaining to its members (limited to those subject to the disposition ordering administration under Article 242, paragraph (1) between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2006 and any other members to be specified by a Cabinet Order; referred to as "Special Members" in Article 1-2-15, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions) solely with the assessments paid by the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation pursuant to the provision of Article 265-33, paragraph (1), the financial conditions of the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation would deteriorate significantly, making it difficult to maintain the credibility of the insurance industry and hence posing the risk of causing unexpected disruptions in the lives of the citizenry and the financial market (limited to the cases where the total amount of such costs exceeds the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order), provide assistance to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation in an amount corresponding to the whole or part of such costs (limited to those required for the Specified Activities) within the amount prescribed by the budget.
２ 政府は、生命保険契約者保護機構がその会員（平成十五年四月一日から平成十八年三月三十一日までに第二百四十二条第一項に規定する管理を命ずる処分を受けたものその他政令で定めるものに限る。附則第一条の二の十五第二項において「特別会員」という。）に係る資金援助その他の業務に要した費用を第二百六十五条の三十三第一項の規定により当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員が納付する負担金のみで賄うとしたならば、当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員の財務の状況を著しく悪化させることにより保険業に対する信頼性の維持が困難となり、ひいては国民生活又は金融市場に不測の混乱を生じさせるおそれがあると認める場合（当該費用の合計額が政令で定める額を超えた場合に限る。）には、予算で定める金額の範囲内において、当該生命保険契約者保護機構に対し、当該費用（特定業務に要したものに限る。）の全部又は一部に相当する金額を補助することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - The rule change regarding the capital adequacy ratio was recently decided and announced and is now in the public comment process. The partial introduction of flexibility into the capital adequacy ratio regulation reflects circumstances specific to Japan, as exemplified by Japanese banks’ relatively large exposure to stocks. Behind the increasing volatility of Japanese stock prices are foreign investment funds’ activities, as a result of which we are now witnessing seemingly irrational events, such as the average PBR (price-to-book ratio) for stocks listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange dropping below one. Meanwhile, valuation losses on securities holdings are required to be deducted from the Tier 1 capital in the calculation of the capital adequacy ratio. We have concluded that for the management of the Japanese economy, it is essential to prevent foreign investment funds’ activities from significantly affecting and undermining the financial intermediary function of Japanese deposit-taking financial institutions, so we have decided on this as an extraordinary measure.
先般決定し公表し、現在パブリックコメントにかかっているということだと思いますが、自己資本比率規制の一部弾力化については、我が国にやや特有の事情と申しましょうか、典型的には我が国の銀行が株式へのエクスポージャーが相対的に大きい、その中で、我が国の株式市場において株価が非常にボラティリティが高くなってきている、その背景には海外の投資ファンド等の動きがある、ということで、結果的に、例えば東京証券取引所でPBR（株価純資産倍率）の平均値が1を下回るといったような、必ずしも合理的には理解しにくいような、そういう事態が出てきている、他方で有価証券の評価損というものが自己資本比率の計算上、ティア1（基本的項目）から控除されるという仕組みになっておりますので、その海外の投資ファンドの動きによって我が国の預金取扱金融機関の金融仲介能力というものが大きく振り回されて、仲介能力が損なわれるという、ここの因果関係をどこかで遮断するということが、我が国の経済全体の運営の上で必要性が極めて高いということで取られた臨時の措置ということでございます。 - 金融庁 - (2) Where a Contract on Specified Continuous Service Offers, etc. has been rescinded pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph, if the Service Provider or the seller sells, acts as an agent for sale, or mediates the sale of the goods specified by a Cabinet Order as goods that need to be purchased by the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. upon offering of Specified Continuous Services (hereinafter referred to as "Related Goods" in this chapter and Article 66 (2)), the provision of the preceding paragraph shall also apply to the contract pertaining to the sales of said goods (hereinafter referred to as a "Sales Contract on Related Goods" in this and the following articles). However, this does not apply when, in spite of receiving the document referred to in Article 42 (2) or (3), the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. had used or consumed in whole or in part such Related Goods as specified by a Cabinet Order as goods of which the value is likely to decline significantly through their use or partial consumption (except where the Service Provider or the seller had induced the Specified Continuous Service Recipient, etc. to use or consume in whole or in part said goods).
２ 前項の規定による特定継続的役務提供等契約の解除があつた場合において、役務提供事業者又は販売業者が特定継続的役務の提供に際し特定継続的役務提供受領者等が購入する必要のある商品として政令で定める商品（以下この章及び第六十六条第二項において「関連商品」という。）の販売又はその代理若しくは媒介を行つている場合には、当該商品の販売に係る契約（以下この条及び次条において「関連商品販売契約」という。）についても、前項と同様とする。ただし、特定継続的役務提供受領者等が第四十二条第二項又は第三項の書面を受領した場合において、関連商品であつてその使用若しくは一部の消費により価額が著しく減少するおそれがある商品として政令で定めるものを使用し又はその全部若しくは一部を消費したとき（当該役務提供事業者又は当該販売業者が当該特定継続的役務提供受領者等に当該商品を使用させ、又はその全部若しくは一部を消費させた場合を除く。）は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (A) Trade name of the futures commission merchant; (B) The fact that the merchant is a futures commission merchant; (C) The breakdown and total amount of consideration payable by customers under whatever titles including but not limited to commission, remuneration and expenses in connection with the consignment contract or, alternatively, the maximum amounts thereof, or the outline of their calculation method (if it is impossible to indicate them, that fact and the reasons thereof); (D) In the case of transactions which require the customers to deposit a clearing margin, etc., the amount thereof and its calculation method; (E) If the transaction amount under the consignment contract is significantly larger than that of the clearing margin, etc. to be deposited by customers for the transaction, that fact, and the ratio of such transaction amount to such clearing margin, etc. (if such calculation is impossible, that fact and the reasons thereof); (F) The fact that transactions under the consignment contract involve a risk of loss incurred by customers due to the fluctuations in the commodity market and, furthermore, that the amount of such loss may exceed that of the clearing margin, etc., and the reasons thereof; and (G) If the futures commission merchant is a member of the Commodity Futures Association of Japan, that fact and the name of the specific association.
①商品取引員の商号②商品取引員である旨③手数料、報酬、費用その他いかなる名称によるかを問わず、受託契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価の種類ごとの金額若しくはその上限額又はこれらの計算方法の概要及び当該金額の合計額若しくはその上限額又はこれらの計算方法の概要（これらの表示をすることができない場合にあっては、その旨及びその理由）④受託契約に関して顧客が預託すべき取引証拠金等がある場合にあっては、その額又は計算方法⑤受託契約に基づく取引が、当該取引について顧客が預託すべき取引証拠金等の額に比して著しく大きい旨及び当該取引の額の当該取引証拠金等の額に対する比率（当該比率を算出することができない場合にあっては、その旨及び理由）⑥商品市場における相場の変動により受託契約に基づく取引について顧客に損失が生ずることとなるおそれがあり、かつ、当該損失の額が取引証拠金等の額を上回ることとなるおそれがある旨及びその理由⑦商品取引員が商品先物取引協会に加入している場合にあっては、その旨及び当該商品先物取引協会の名称 - 経済産業省 - (iv) the method of having information broadcast through the broadcasting equipment of a general broadcaster, a Cable Television Broadcaster (which means the Cable Television Broadcaster set forth in Article 2, paragraph (4) of the Cable Television Broadcasting Act [Act No. 114 of 1972]), a person engaged in the business of Cable Radio Broadcasting (which means Cable Radio Broadcasting as set forth in Article 2 of the Act on Regulation on the Operation of Cable Radio Broadcasting Business [Act No. 135 of 1951]) or a person engaged in the business of Broadcasting Using Telecommunications Services (which means Broadcasting Using Telecommunications Services as set forth in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Act on Broadcasting Using Telecommunications Services [Act No. 85 of 2001]), the method of having customers inspect, via telecommunications lines, the contents of information that is recorded onto a file in a computer used by a Futures Commission Merchant or a person who has accepted consignment of business pertaining to advertising, etc. conducted by the Futures Commission Merchant, or the method of indicating information to the public either indoors or outdoors on a constant basis or continuously for a certain period where the information is posted or indicated on a signboard, a billboard, a poster, a placard or an advertising pillar, advertising board, building or any other structure, etc., or a method similar thereto, in which case the following matters are clearly and accurately indicated and there is no indication that is significantly contradictory to facts or seriously misleading with regard to the profits forecast from conducting a Transaction on a Commodity Market, etc. and other matters specified in Article 100-6:
四 次に掲げる事項を明瞭かつ正確に表示し、かつ、商品市場における取引等を行うことによる利益の見込みその他第百条の六で定める事項について、著しく事実に相違するような表示をし、又は著しく人を誤認させるような表示をしていない、一般放送事業者、有線テレビジョン放送事業者（有線テレビジョン放送法（昭和四十七年法律第百十四号）第二条第四項の有線テレビジョン放送事業者をいう。）、有線ラジオ放送（有線ラジオ放送業務の運用の規正に関する法律（昭和二十六年法律第百三十五号）第二条の有線ラジオ放送をいう。）の業務を行う者及び電気通信役務利用放送（電気通信役務利用放送法（平成十三年法律第八十五号）第二条第一項の電気通信役務利用放送をいう。）の業務を行う者の放送設備により放送させる方法、商品取引員又は当該商品取引員が行う広告等に係る業務の委託を受けた者の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに記録された情報の内容を電気通信回線を利用して顧客に閲覧させる方法並びに常時又は一定の期間継続して屋内又は屋外で公衆に表示させる方法であって、看板、立看板、はり紙及びはり札並びに広告塔、広告板、建物その他の工作物等に掲出させ、又は表示させるもの並びにこれらに類するもの - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 1-2-13 (1) The Government may, when it finds that if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation (referring to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation set forth in Article 265-37, paragraph (1); the same shall apply hereafter in this Article, as well as in the following Article and Article 1-2-15 of the Supplementary Provisions) was to cover the costs of Financial Assistance and other activities pertaining to its members (limited to those subject to the disposition ordering administration under Article 242, paragraph (1) by 31 March 2003 and any other members to be specified by a Cabinet Order; referred to as "Specified Members" in Article 1-2-15, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions) solely with the assessments paid by the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation pursuant to the provision of Article 265-33, paragraph (1), the financial conditions of the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation would deteriorate significantly, making it difficult to maintain the credibility of the insurance industry and hence posing the risk of causing unexpected disruptions in the lives of the citizenry and the financial market (limited to the cases where the total amount of such costs exceeds the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order), provide assistance to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation in an amount corresponding to the whole or part of such costs (limited to those required for the activities to be specified by a Cabinet Order (referred to as "Specified Activities" in the following paragraph, the following Article and Article 1-2-15 of the Supplementary Provisions) within the amount prescribed by the budget.
第一条の二の十三 政府は、生命保険契約者保護機構（第二百六十五条の三十七第一項に規定する生命保険契約者保護機構をいう。以下この条、次条及び附則第一条の二の十五において同じ。）がその会員（平成十五年三月三十一日までに第二百四十二条第一項に規定する管理を命ずる処分を受けたものその他政令で定めるものに限る。附則第一条の二の十五第一項において「特定会員」という。）に係る資金援助その他の業務に要した費用を第二百六十五条の三十三第一項の規定により当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員が納付する負担金のみで賄うとしたならば、当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員の財務の状況を著しく悪化させることにより保険業に対する信頼性の維持が困難となり、ひいては国民生活又は金融市場に不測の混乱を生じさせるおそれがあると認める場合（当該費用の合計額が政令で定める額を超えた場合に限る。）には、予算で定める金額の範囲内において、当該生命保険契約者保護機構に対し、当該費用（政令で定める業務（次項、次条及び附則第一条の二の十五において「特定業務」という。）に要したものに限る。）の全部又は一部に相当する金額を補助することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 1-2-14 (1) The Government may, when it finds that if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation was to cover the costs of Financial Assistance and other activities pertaining to its members (limited to those subject to the disposition ordering administration under Article 242, paragraph (1) between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2009 and any other members to be specified by a Cabinet Order; referred to as "Members under Special Provisions" in paragraph (3) of the following Article) solely with the assessments paid by the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation pursuant to the provision of Article 265-33, paragraph (1), the financial conditions of the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation would deteriorate significantly, making it difficult to maintain the credibility of the insurance industry and hence posing the risk of causing serious consequences in the lives of the citizenry and the financial market (limited to the cases where the sum total of the amount of outstanding debts of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation as of the date specified by a Cabinet Order and the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of additional debts to be incurred if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation should have to finance such costs through borrowings exceeds the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order taking into consideration the long-term balance of payments of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation), provide assistance to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation in an amount corresponding to the whole or part of such costs (limited to those required for the Specified Activities) within the amount prescribed by the budget.
第一条の二の十四 政府は、生命保険契約者保護機構がその会員（平成十八年四月一日から平成二十一年三月三十一日までの間に第二百四十二条第一項に規定する管理を命ずる処分を受けたものその他政令で定めるものに限る。次条第三項において「特例会員」という。）に係る資金援助その他の業務に要した費用を第二百六十五条の三十三第一項の規定により当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員が納付する負担金のみで賄うとしたならば、当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員の財務の状況を著しく悪化させることにより保険業に対する信頼性の維持が困難となり、ひいては国民生活又は金融市場に極めて重大な支障が生じるおそれがあると認める場合（政令で定める日における当該生命保険契約者保護機構の借入残高に、当該生命保険契約者保護機構が当該費用を借入れにより賄うとした場合の当該借入れの額として政令で定める額を加えた額が当該生命保険契約者保護機構の長期的な収支を勘案して政令で定める額を超える場合に限る。）には、予算で定める金額の範囲内において、当該生命保険契約者保護機構に対し、当該費用（特定業務に要したものに限る。）の全部又は一部に相当する金額を補助することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day.
２ 新銀行法第十三条第二項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額（同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等（同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 68-90 (1) Where an affiliated foreign company related to any of the following consolidated corporations, which falls under the category of affiliated foreign company specified by a Cabinet Order as a company whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign subsidiary company, etc."), in each business year, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. held by the consolidated corporation through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim prescribed in Article 66-6(1); the same shall apply in item (i)) vested in such shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; the same shall apply in this paragraph) (such part of eligible retained income hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as "individually taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the amount of the consolidated corporation's profit, and included in its gross profit in the calculation of the amount of its consolidated income for the consolidated business year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year:
第六十八条の九十 次に掲げる連結法人に係る外国関係会社のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係会社に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国子会社等」という。）が、各事業年度において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有する場合には、その適用対象留保金額のうちその連結法人の有する当該特定外国子会社等の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の請求権（第六十六条の六第一項に規定する請求権をいう。第一号において同じ。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（以下この款において「個別課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、その連結法人の収益の額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日を含むその連結法人の各連結事業年度の連結所得の金額の計算上、益金の額に算入する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 66-6 (1) Where an affiliated foreign company related to any of the following domestic corporations, which falls under the category of affiliated foreign company specified by a Cabinet Order as a company whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign subsidiary company, etc."), in each business year beginning on or after April 1, 1978, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and the next paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. held by the domestic corporation through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim to demand dividend of surplus, etc., distribution of property and any other economic benefit; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) vested in such shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) (such part of eligible retained income hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as "taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the amount of the domestic corporation's profit, and included in its gross profit in the calculation of the amount of its income for the business year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year:
第六十六条の六 次に掲げる内国法人に係る外国関係会社のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係会社に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国子会社等」という。）が、昭和五十三年四月一日以後に開始する各事業年度において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項及び次項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有する場合には、その適用対象留保金額のうちその内国法人の有する当該特定外国子会社等の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の請求権（剰余金の配当等、財産の分配その他の経済的な利益の給付を請求する権利をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（以下この款において「課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、その内国法人の収益の額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日を含むその内国法人の各事業年度の所得の金額の計算上、益金の額に算入する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 40-4 (1) Where an affiliated foreign company related to any of the following residents, which falls under the category of affiliated foreign company specified by a Cabinet Order as a company whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign subsidiary company, etc."), in each business year (meaning a business year prescribed in Article 2(2)(xix); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) beginning on or after April 1, 1978, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and the next paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. held by the resident through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim to demand dividend of surplus, etc., distribution of property and any other economic benefit; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) vested in such shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) (such part of eligible retained income hereinafter referred to as "taxable retained income" in the next Article) shall be deemed to be the resident's income categorized as miscellaneous income, and included in his/her gross income in the calculation of the amount of his/her miscellaneous income for the year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year:
第四十条の四 次に掲げる居住者に係る外国関係会社のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係会社に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国子会社等」という。）が、昭和五十三年四月一日以後に開始する各事業年度（第二条第二項第十九号に規定する事業年度をいう。以下この条において同じ。）において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項及び次項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有する場合には、その適用対象留保金額のうちその者の有する当該特定外国子会社等の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の請求権（剰余金の配当等、財産の分配その他の経済的な利益の給付を請求する権利をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（次条において「課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、その者の雑所得に係る収入金額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日の属する年分のその者の雑所得の金額の計算上、総収入金額に算入する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day.
３ 新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 66-9-6 (1) Where, between a specially-related shareholder, etc. (meaning a person who falls under the category of specified shareholder, etc. as well as an individual and a corporation having a special relationship therewith as specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Subsection) and a specially-related domestic corporation, there is a relationship specified by a Cabinet Order as a relationship whereby the said specially-related shareholder, etc. indirectly holds shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) that account for 80 percent or more of the total number or total amount of issued shares of or capital contributions to the said specially-related domestic corporation (excluding the shares or capital contributions held by the corporation; hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and the next paragraph as "issued shares, etc.") (such relationship referred to in the next paragraph as a "specified relationship"), and a foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as acting as an intermediary between the said specially-related shareholder, etc. and the said specially-related domestic corporation by way of the holding of the issued shares, etc. (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as an "affiliated foreign corporation"), which falls under the category of affiliated foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as a corporation whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign corporation"), in each business year beginning on or after October 1, 2007, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign corporation held by the domestic corporation that is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim to demand dividend of surplus, etc., distribution of property and any other economic benefit) vested in such shares, etc. (such part of eligible retained income hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as "taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the amount of profit of the domestic corporation that is the said specially-related shareholder, etc., and included in its gross profit in the calculation of the amount of its income for the business year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year.
第六十六条の九の六 特殊関係株主等（特定株主等に該当する者並びにこれらの者と政令で定める特殊の関係のある個人及び法人をいう。以下この款において同じ。）と特殊関係内国法人との間に当該特殊関係株主等が当該特殊関係内国法人の発行済株式又は出資（自己が有する自己の株式又は出資を除く。以下この項及び次項において「発行済株式等」という。）の総数又は総額の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）を間接に保有する関係として政令で定める関係（次項において「特定関係」という。）がある場合において、当該特殊関係株主等と特殊関係内国法人との間に発行済株式等の保有を通じて介在するものとして政令で定める外国法人（以下この款において「外国関係法人」という。）のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係法人に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国法人」という。）が、平成十九年十月一日以後に開始する各事業年度において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有するときは、その適用対象留保金額のうち当該特殊関係株主等である内国法人の有する当該特定外国法人の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等の請求権（剰余金の配当等、財産の分配その他の経済的な利益の給付を請求する権利をいう。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（以下この款において「課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、当該特殊関係株主等である内国法人の収益の額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日を含む当該内国法人の各事業年度の所得の金額の計算上、益金の額に算入する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 68-93-6 (1) Where, between a specially-related shareholder, etc. (meaning a person who falls under the category of specified shareholder, etc. as well as an individual and a corporation having a special relationship therewith as specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Subsection) and a specially-related domestic corporation, there is a special relationship (meaning a relationship specified by a Cabinet Order as a relationship whereby the said specially-related shareholder, etc. indirectly holds shares or capital contributions that account for 80 percent or more of the total number or total amount of issued shares of or capital contributions to the said specially-related domestic corporation (excluding the shares or capital contributions held by the corporation; hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "issued shares, etc."), and a foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as acting as an intermediary between the said specially-related shareholder, etc. and the said specially-related domestic corporation by way of the holding of the issued shares, etc. (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as an "affiliated foreign corporation"), which falls under the category of affiliated foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as a corporation whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than a tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign corporation"), in each business year beginning on or after October 1, 2007, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, etc. (meaning dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act) (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign corporation held by the consolidated corporation that is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim prescribed in Article 66-9-6(1) vested in such shares or capital contributions (such part of eligible retained income hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as "individually taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the amount of profit of the consolidated corporation that is the said specially-related shareholder, etc., and included in its gross profit in the calculation of the amount of its consolidated income for the consolidated business year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year.
第六十八条の九十三の六 特殊関係株主等（特定株主等に該当する者並びにこれらの者と政令で定める特殊の関係のある個人及び法人をいう。以下この款において同じ。）と特殊関係内国法人との間に特定関係（当該特殊関係株主等が当該特殊関係内国法人の発行済株式又は出資（自己が有する自己の株式又は出資を除く。以下この項において「発行済株式等」という。）の総数又は総額の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式又は出資を間接に保有する関係として政令で定める関係をいう。）がある場合において、当該特殊関係株主等と特殊関係内国法人との間に発行済株式等の保有を通じて介在するものとして政令で定める外国法人（以下この款において「外国関係法人」という。）のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係法人に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国法人」という。）が、平成十九年十月一日以後に開始する各事業年度において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び剰余金の配当等（法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配をいう。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有するときは、その適用対象留保金額のうち当該特殊関係株主等である連結法人の有する当該特定外国法人の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式又は出資の第六十六条の九の六第一項に規定する請求権の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（以下この款において「個別課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、当該特殊関係株主等である連結法人の収益の額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日を含む当該連結法人の各連結事業年度の連結所得の金額の計算上、益金の額に算入する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 40-10 (1) Where, between a specially-related shareholder, etc. (meaning a person who falls under the category of specified shareholder, etc. as well as an individual and a corporation having a special relationship therewith as specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Subsection) and a specially-related domestic corporation, there is a relationship specified by a Cabinet Order as a relationship whereby the said specially-related shareholder, etc. indirectly holds shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) that accounts for 80 percent or more of the total number or total amount of issued shares of or capital contributions to the said specially-related domestic corporation (excluding the shares or capital contributions held by the corporation; hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and the next paragraph as "issued shares, etc.") (such relationship referred to in the next paragraph as a "specified relationship"), and a foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as acting as an intermediary between the said specially-related shareholder, etc. and the said specially-related domestic corporation by way of the holding of the issued shares, etc. (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as an "affiliated foreign corporation"), which falls under the category of affiliated foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as a corporation whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign corporation"), in each business year (meaning a business year prescribed in Article 2(2)(xix); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) beginning on or after October 1, 2007, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign corporation held by the resident who is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim to demand dividend of surplus, etc., distribution of property and any other economic benefit) vested in such shares, etc. (such part of eligible retained income referred to in the next Article as "taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the income of the resident who is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. categorized as miscellaneous income, and included in his/her gross income in the calculation of the amount of his/her miscellaneous income for the year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year:
第四十条の十 特殊関係株主等（特定株主等に該当する者並びにこれらの者と政令で定める特殊の関係のある個人及び法人をいう。以下この款において同じ。）と特殊関係内国法人との間に当該特殊関係株主等が当該特殊関係内国法人の発行済株式又は出資（自己が有する自己の株式又は出資を除く。以下この項及び次項において「発行済株式等」という。）の総数又は総額の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）を間接に保有する関係として政令で定める関係（次項において「特定関係」という。）がある場合において、当該特殊関係株主等と特殊関係内国法人との間に発行済株式等の保有を通じて介在するものとして政令で定める外国法人（以下この款において「外国関係法人」という。）のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係法人に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国法人」という。）が、平成十九年十月一日以後に開始する各事業年度（第二条第二項第十九号に規定する事業年度をいう。以下この条において同じ。）において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有するときは、その適用対象留保金額のうち当該特殊関係株主等である居住者の有する当該特定外国法人の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等の請求権（剰余金の配当等、財産の分配その他の経済的な利益の給付を請求する権利をいう。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（次条において「課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、当該特殊関係株主等である居住者の雑所得に係る収入金額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日の属する年分の当該居住者の雑所得の金額の計算上、総収入金額に算入する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day.
第百二条 第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) Article 27-2(2) to (6) inclusive, Article 27-3 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (1) and item (ii) of paragraph (2)), Article 27-4, Article 27-5 (limited to the non-itemized part thereof; the same shall apply in paragraph (5) and Article 27-22-3(5)), Articles 27-6 to 27-9 inclusive (excluding Article 27-8(6), (10) and (12)), Article 27-11 to 15 inclusive (excluding Article 27-11(4) and Article 27-13(3) and (4)(i)), Article 27-17, Article 27-18, Article 27-21(1) and paragraph (1) of the preceding Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to Purchase, etc. conducted under the preceding paragraph by means of Tender Offer. In this case, the term "Share Certificates, etc." in these provisions (excluding Article 27-3(4) and the proviso to Article 27-11(1)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Listed Share Certificates, etc."; the term "Sales, etc. (meaning sales or other type of transfer for value; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Sales, etc."; the term "the following matters" in Article 27-3(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the matters listed in items (i) and (iii) below"; the part "period of Purchase, etc. (including the statement included in the public notice under the second sentence of the preceding paragraph)" in Article 27-3(2)(i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "period of Purchase, etc."; the part "The Tender Offeror, Persons in Special Relationship with the Tender Offeror (meaning Persons in Special Relationship as defined in Article 27-2(7); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section), or other person concerned as specified by a Cabinet Order" in Article 27-3(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Tender Offeror or other person concerned as specified by a Cabinet Order"; the part "to the Issuer of the Share Certificates, etc. to which the Tender Offer is made (and the person who has already submitted a Tender Offer Notification with regard to any Share Certificates, etc. issued by the Issuer as of the day on which the Tender Offer Notification is submitted, if any), and, if the Share Certificates, etc. for which the Tender Offer is made fall under any of the categories listed in the following items, also send a copy of the Tender Offer Notification to the exchange or association specified in the following items for each kind of Share Certificates, etc. set forth in the respective items" in the first sentence of Article 27-3(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "to the exchange or association specified in the following items for each kind of Securities set forth in the respective items, and also send a copy of the Tender Offer Notification to the person who has already submitted a Tender Offer Notification with regard to any Share Certificates, etc. issued by the Issuer as of the day on which the Tender Offer Notification is submitted, if any"; the term "Share Certificates, etc." in the items of Article 27-3(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Listed Share Certificates, etc."; the part "lower the price for Purchase, etc. (excluding those implemented in cases where the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer and the Tender Offer Notification state as one of the Terms of Purchase, etc. that the price for Purchase, etc. may be lowered according to standards specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance if the Subject Company (meaning Subject Company defined in Article 27-10(1)) conducts share split or other act specified by a Cabinet Order.)" in Article 27-6(1)(i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "lower the price for Purchase, etc."; the part "the details of the change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. (excluding the extension of the period for Purchase, etc. made under Article 27-10(3))" in Article 27-6(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the details of the change in the Terms of Purchase, etc."; the part "any change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. (excluding the extension of the period for Purchase, etc. made under Article 27-10(3))" in Article 27-8(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "any change in the Terms of Purchase, etc."; the part "the Tender Offeror states as one of the Terms of Purchase, etc. in the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer and Tender Offer Notification that the Tender Offer may be withdrawn if there occurs any important change in the business or property of the Issuer of the Share Certificates, etc. for which the Tender Offer is made or its Subsidiary (meaning Subsidiary as defined in Article 2(iii) of the Companies Act) or there occurs any other circumstance that would significantly impede the achievement of the purpose of the Tender Offer (limited to those specified by a Cabinet Order), or where a decision of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings is made against the Tender Offeror or there occurs any other material change in circumstances as specified by a Cabinet Order" in the proviso to Article 27-11(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Purchase, etc. of Listed Share Certificates, etc. conducted through the Tender Offer violates other laws and regulations or where there occurs any circumstances specified by a Cabinet Order as those involving the risk of violation of other laws and regulations"; the part "states any of the following as one of the Terms of Purchase, etc. in the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer and Tender Offer Notification (with regard to the term specified in item (ii), limited to cases where the Share Certificates, etc. Holding Rate (meaning Share Certificates, etc. Holding Rate as defined in Article 27-2(8)) of Share Certificates, etc. in possession by the Tender Offeror after the Tender Offer, or, in cases where there are Persons in Special Relationship as specified in Article 27-2(1)(i) with the Tender Offeror, the Share Certificates, etc. Holding Rate calculated by adding the Share Certificates, etc. Holding Rate of the Persons in Special Relationship as defined in Article 27-2(8) to that for the person who conducted the Purchase, etc.) will not exceed the rate specified by a Cabinet Order)" in Article 27-13(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "states the term specified in item (ii) below as one of the Terms of Purchase, etc. in the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer and Tender Offer Notification"; the part ", the Subject Company's Position Statement and the Tender Offeror's Answer (including" in Article 27-14(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "(including"; the part ", Article 27-10(9) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-10(10)) and Article 27-10(13) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-10(14)) at" in Article 27-14(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "at"; the part ", Tender Offer Report, Subject Company's Position Statement or Tender Offeror's Answer" in Article 27-15(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Tender Offer Report"; the term "Tender Offeror, etc. and the Subject Company" in Article 27-15(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Tender Offeror"; and the term "Tender Offeror, Persons in Special Relationship with the Tender Offeror" in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Tender Offeror."
２ 第二十七条の二第二項から第六項まで、第二十七条の三（第一項後段及び第二項第二号を除く。）、第二十七条の四、第二十七条の五（各号列記以外の部分に限る。第五項及び第二十七条の二十二の三第五項において同じ。）、第二十七条の六から第二十七条の九まで（第二十七条の八第六項、第十項及び第十二項を除く。）、第二十七条の十一から第二十七条の十五まで（第二十七条の十一第四項並びに第二十七条の十三第三項及び第四項第一号を除く。）、第二十七条の十七、第二十七条の十八、第二十七条の二十一第一項及び前条第一項の規定は、前項の規定により公開買付けによる買付け等を行う場合について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定（第二十七条の三第四項及び第二十七条の十一第一項ただし書を除く。）中「株券等」とあるのは「上場株券等」と、第二十七条の二第六項中「売付け等（売付けその他の有償の譲渡をいう。以下この章において同じ。）」とあるのは「売付け等」と、第二十七条の三第二項中「次に」とあるのは「第一号及び第三号に」と、同項第一号中「買付け等の期間（前項後段の規定により公告において明示した内容を含む。）」とあるのは「買付け等の期間」と、同条第三項中「公開買付者、その特別関係者（第二十七条の二第七項に規定する特別関係者をいう。以下この節において同じ。）その他政令で定める関係者」とあるのは「公開買付者その他政令で定める関係者」と、同条第四項前段中「当該公開買付けに係る株券等の発行者（当該公開買付届出書を提出した日において、既に当該発行者の株券等に係る公開買付届出書の提出をしている者がある場合には、当該提出をしている者を含む。）に送付するとともに、当該公開買付けに係る株券等が次の各号に掲げる株券等に該当する場合には、当該各号に掲げる株券等の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める者」とあるのは「次の各号に掲げる当該公開買付けに係る上場株券等の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める者に送付するとともに、当該公開買付届出書を提出した日において、既に当該公開買付者が発行者である株券等に係る公開買付届出書の提出をしている者がある場合には、当該提出をしている者」と、同項各号中「株券等」とあるのは「上場株券等」と、第二十七条の五ただし書中「次に掲げる」とあるのは「政令で定める」と、第二十七条の六第一項第一号中「買付け等の価格の引下げ（公開買付開始公告及び公開買付届出書において公開買付期間中に対象者（第二十七条の十第一項に規定する対象者をいう。）が株式の分割その他の政令で定める行為を行つたときは内閣府令で定める基準に従い買付け等の価格の引下げを行うことがある旨の条件を付した場合に行うものを除く。）」とあるのは「買付け等の価格の引下げ」と、同条第二項中「買付条件等の変更の内容（第二十七条の十第三項の規定により買付け等の期間が延長された場合における当該買付け等の期間の延長を除く。）」とあるのは「買付条件等の変更の内容」と、第二十七条の八第二項中「買付条件等の変更（第二十七条の十第三項の規定による買付け等の期間の延長を除く。）」とあるのは「買付条件等の変更」と、第二十七条の十一第一項ただし書中「公開買付者が公開買付開始公告及び公開買付届出書において公開買付けに係る株券等の発行者若しくはその子会社（会社法第二条第三号に規定する子会社をいう。）の業務若しくは財産に関する重要な変更その他の公開買付けの目的の達成に重大な支障となる事情（政令で定めるものに限る。）が生じたときは公開買付けの撤回等をすることがある旨の条件を付した場合又は公開買付者に関し破産手続開始の決定その他の政令で定める重要な事情の変更が生じた」とあるのは「当該公開買付けにより当該上場株券等の買付け等を行うことが他の法令に違反することとなる場合又は他の法令に違反することとなるおそれがある事情として政令で定める事情が生じた」と、第二十七条の十三第四項中「次に掲げる条件を付した場合（第二号の条件を付す場合にあつては、当該公開買付けの後における公開買付者の所有に係る株券等の株券等所有割合（第二十七条の二第八項に規定する株券等所有割合をいい、当該公開買付者に同条第一項第一号に規定する特別関係者がある場合にあつては、当該特別関係者の所有に係る株券等の同条第八項に規定する株券等所有割合を加算したものをいう。）が政令で定める割合を下回る場合に限る。）」とあるのは「第二号に掲げる条件を付した場合」と、第二十七条の十四第一項中「、意見表明報告書及び対質問回答報告書（これらの」とあるのは「（その」と、同条第三項中「並びに第二十七条の十第九項（同条第十項において準用する場合を含む。）及び第十三項（同条第十四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定」とあるのは「の規定」と、第二十七条の十五第一項中「、公開買付報告書、意見表明報告書又は対質問回答報告書」とあるのは「又は公開買付報告書」と、同条第二項中「公開買付者等及び対象者」とあるのは「公開買付者等」と、前条第一項中「公開買付者若しくはその特別関係者」とあるのは「公開買付者」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
- 経済産業省
- Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
- 金融庁
- Copyright(C) 2026 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
- 厚生労働省
- Copyright © Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, All Right reserved.
- 特許庁
- Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
- ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
