「knowledge」を含む例文一覧(8344)

＜前へ 1 2 .... 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 次へ＞
  • (3) The President of the Japan Federation of Bar Associations shall appoint eight members from attorneys at law, one member respectively from judges, public prosecutors and persons with relevant knowledge and experience (in total three), and two members from government officials, provided, however, that the member who is a judge, a public prosecutor or a government official shall be appointed based on the recommendation of the Supreme Court, the Prosecutor General or the Minister of Justice respectively, and the other members shall be appointed on the decision of such organ of the Japan Federation of Bar Associations as stipulated by the Articles of Association of the Japan Federation of Bar Associations.
    ３　委員のうち、八人は弁護士の中から、三人は裁判官、検察官及び学識経験者の中からそれぞれ一人ずつ、二人は政府職員の中から日本弁護士連合会の会長が委嘱する。ただし、裁判官、検察官又は政府職員である委員は最高裁判所、検事総長又は法務大臣の推薦に基づき、その他の委員は日本弁護士連合会の会則で定める日本弁護士連合会の機関の決議に基づかなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) The President of the Japan Federation of Bar Associations shall appoint eight members from attorneys at law, six from judges, public prosecutors and government officials, with two from each category, and one from persons with relevant knowledge and experience; provided, however, that the members who are judges, public prosecutors or government officials shall be appointed based on the recommendation of the Supreme Court, the Prosecutor General or the Minister of Justice, respectively, and the other members, on the resolution of such organ of the Japan Federation of Bar Associations as stipulated by the Articles of Association of the Japan Federation of Bar Associations.
    ２　委員のうち、八人は弁護士の中から、六人は裁判官、検察官及び政府職員の中からそれぞれ二人ずつ、一人は学識経験者の中から日本弁護士連合会の会長が委嘱する。ただし、裁判官、検察官又は政府職員である委員は最高裁判所、検事総長又は法務大臣の推薦に基づき、その他の委員は日本弁護士連合会の会則で定める日本弁護士連合会の機関の決議に基づかなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (iv) If an officer, etc. (referring to an officer or person who has sufficient knowledge and experience in legal compliance control and holds the position to instruct or supervise other employees; hereinafter the same shall apply in (iv)) receives non-shared information, other than the non-shared information that is under management by any one corporation, etc. where he/she works, for the purpose of conducting operations concerning governance or internal control, such case does not constitute the leakage of non-shared information; in this case, however, whether the following measures have been taken.
    ④ 役員等（役員又は法令遵守管理に関する十分な知識・経験を有し、他の職員の指導・監督を行う立場にある職員をいう。以下④において同じ。）が、経営管理又は内部管理に関する業務を行うために、その従事する一の法人等が管理する非共有情報以外の非共有情報の提供を受けることは、非共有情報の漏えいには該当しないと考えられるが、その場合には、例えば以下のような措置が講じられているか。 - 金融庁
  • Thus, although we realize our approach will be more costly than only requiring due diligence and, potentially, a Conflict Minerals Report if the issuer has affirmative knowledge that its minerals came from the Covered Countries, in our view, requiring further steps by issuers that have reason to believe that they have necessary conflict minerals that may have originated in the Covered Countries is necessary to carry out the requirements contemplated by the statute.
    つまり、我々の方式は、鉱物が対象国からであるという断定的な知識をもっている場合にのみデュー・ディリジェンスと、ひいては紛争鉱物報告書を義務付ける場合よりも費用が高くつくことを我々は認識しているが、紛争鉱物法律規定が構想している要件を実行するためには、自らのもつ必要な紛争鉱物が対象国を原産国とする可能性があると確信する理由のある発行人に対して、さらなる措置を義務付けることが必要だというのが我々の見解である。 - 経済産業省
  • The report pointed out that: (i) while ICT is an important factor for economic growth, having a domestic ICT manufacturing industry is not necessarily an essential condition for a country's growth; and (ii) in order for ICT to be effectively utilized to give fully play to its utility, it needs to be supported with appropriate skills and capabilities, and thus human capital is an important factor in realizing economic growth, leading to an increasing demand for knowledge workers (Fig. 2.1.6).
    その中では、①情報通信技術は成長にとって重要な要素ではあるが、情報通信製造産業自体を保有することが国にとっての成長の必要条件ではないこと、及び②情報通信技術が効果的に利用されその効用が発揮されるためには、適切なスキルと能力を伴うことが必要であり、人的資本が経済成長を実現する上で重要な要素となっていること、このため、頭脳労働者への需要が増加していること（第2-1-6図）、が指摘されている - 経済産業省
  • Accordingly, the infrastructure to facilitate the creation of technologies with greater application potential is required through the implementation of a support package or similar measures for venture firms. Policies to nurture venture firms would include an increase in their research funding, the promotion of facility and equipment sharing and co-research with venture firms, the establishment of a framework allowing former players with expert knowledge of pharmaceuticals to be utilized in advising venture firms, and other measures to support the commercialization of embryonic technologies. (Fiscal 2007 ~ )
    それゆえ、ベンチャー企業育成策として、ベンチャー企業を対象とした研究開発資金のファンディングの拡充、ベンチャー企業を対象とした施設・機器の共用化や共同研究の促進、医薬品の専門知識を有するＯＢ人材を活用し、ベンチャー企業が助言を受けられる仕組みの構築等の萌芽技術をビジネスにつなげるための支援策など、ベンチャー企業の支援策を講ずるなど、より実用性の高い技術を創出できる環境整備が必要である。（2007 年度～） - 厚生労働省
  • In the dispute Saicho attacked the opponent by using fiery expressions and as an example in "Shugo-kokkai-sho" Saicho called Tokuitsu who was the focus of criticism in a pejorative manner, 'sojikisha' (people who have a superficial knowledge and eat humbly), 'hobosha' (people who disparage the dharma), 'hokuensha' (people who turn the shafts of gissha (ox-drawn carriage) or horse-drawn buggy to the north even though they go to go to the south because he cannot understand the direction) and never called Tokuitsu by his real name.
    論争において最澄は、しばしば非常に激烈な表現を用いて論敵を攻撃しており、たとえば『守護国界章』において最澄は、非難の対象である徳一のことを「麁食者（そじきしゃ。粗末な食べ方をする者、半可通のこと）」「謗法者（ほうぼうしゃ。賢しらに法を曲げる者）」「北轅者（ほくえんしゃ。南に行こうとして牛車・馬車の轅（ながえ）を北に向ける者。方角もわきまえぬ者）」などの蔑称で呼び、本名の徳一で呼ぶことは一切ない。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • "The Tale of Genji" after the Kamakura period was treated as an important intellectual source of classic knowledge, and in those days it was a general practice that manuscripts would be copied carefully from a reliable manuscript that could be the shohon (premised book) and completed after collation; however, in the Heian period stories like "The Tale of Genji" were diffused widely and many manuscripts were made, and among them was a manuscript made by upper-class people such as MINAMOTO no Reishi.
    しかしながら鎌倉時代以降の『源氏物語』が古典として重要な教養の源泉であるとされた以後の時代に作成された写本は、証本となしうる信頼できる写本を元に注意深く写しとって、きちんと校合などもした上で完成させることが一般的であったが、それ以前、平安時代には『源氏物語』等の物語は広く普及し多くの写本が作られており、その中には源麗子本等の身分の高い人物が自ら作ったと見られる写本もあった。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • An Association shall stipulate in its dispute resolution rules that it will establish an arbitration/conciliation committee (referred to as a "Committee" in the following Article) organized by committee members who have relevant knowledge and experience of Futures Transactions and who satisfy other requirements specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry for the purpose of implementing arbitration and conciliation with regard to any dispute that arises between Association Members or between an Association Member and a customer concerning the acceptance of a consignment of Transactions on a Commodity Market, etc. (referred to as a "Dispute Pertaining to Consignment" in the following Article).
    協会は、紛争処理規程において、商品市場における取引等の受託に関して協会員間又は協会員と顧客との間に生じた紛争（次条において「受託に係る紛争」という。）について、あつせん及び調停を行うため、先物取引について学識経験を有することその他主務省令で定める要件に該当する委員をもつて組織されるあつせん・調停委員会（次条において「委員会」という。）を置く旨を定めなければならない。 - 経済産業省
  • In fact, in the Survey on Personnel Management, when large enterprises and SMEs were asked about the reasons for emphasizing the seniority-based wage system, the most popular reply was “to promote long term commitment, and thus attempt to accumulate knowledge and expertise” topping replies such as “difficulty of achieving the equal evaluation of employees, necessary for performance-based wages” and “unity and teamwork among employees is more important than the performance of individual employees” by far (Fig. 3-3-5).
    実際、「人材アンケート調査」により、大企業や中小企業のうち年功序列を重視している企業にその理由を聞いた結果を見ると、「長期間の勤続を促し、知識・技能の蓄積を図るため」が最も多く、「成果主義の場合、個々の従業員の成果を評価する必要があるが、そのような評価を公平に行うことが困難なため」といった理由や「個々の従業員の成果よりも、従業員の調和やチームワークの尊重が重要であるため」という回答を大きく上回った（第3-3-5図）。 - 経済産業省
  • In particular, the rate of increase of the ratio of older people in the manufacturing industry is progressing much faster than the average of all other industries, making people uneasy over the fact that the techniques which have been accumulated over a long period of time are not being sufficiently passed down due to the aging of the human resources. There are concerns over such cases where the highly-qualified older people who have acquired their skills through many years of practice may be employed at workplaces where they are unable to apply their skills. It is also thought that retiring from the labor market as a whole not only causes a great loss in terms of labor power, but also in terms of the "knowledge" such as skills and know-how possessed by these people.
    特に、製造業では高齢化の速度が全産業平均と比べて速く、人材の高齢化によって、長年、培われてきた技術の継承に危機感がもたれており、長く経験を積み高い技能を身につけた高齢者が、その能力を発揮できない職場に雇用されたり、あるいは、労働市場から引退することは、労働力面のみならず、スキルやノウハウといった「知識」の面で大きな損失となると考えられている。 - 経済産業省
  • Public job training programs implemented by the government are intended to train workers in the use of the kind of sophisticated machinery which has actually been installed at manufacturing sites to have them acquire advanced skills, so that they can serve as core human resources of the manufacturing industry in the future. At the same time, the training programs provide training for existing workers through training courses related to advanced knowledge and skills in a wide range of fields, such as adaptation to new technologies and improvement of production processes.
    国が実施する公共職業訓練においては、最近のものづくり現場に導入されている高精度な機械を装備したうえ、ものづくり産業において将来の中核人材となる高度な技能を有する労働者の養成を目的とした訓練を実施するとともに、新たな技術への対応、生産工程の改善・改良等、高度かつ幅広い分野にわたる知識、技能についてコースを設定し、在職者を対象とした訓練を実施しているところである。 - 経済産業省
  • In the open innovation model, companies undertake initiatives such as collaborative research and development with other firms to improve their research and development efficiency and to actively incorporate their technologies and knowledge; launching new businesses by obtaining license from other companies; transferring or provide license of intellectual property rights, which cannot be used by themselves, to other companies; creating a new market with international standards where participating companies share and utilize their intellectual property rights.
    オープン・イノベーションとは、例えば、研究開発の効率化を図るために他社との共同研究開発を行うことによりその技術や知識を積極的に取り入れたり、他社からライセンスを受けて新規事業に乗り出したりすること、逆に自社利用が見込めない知的財産を他者に譲渡したり、ライセンスしたりすることや、新たな市場の創出を目指して仲間となる企業同士がそれぞれの知的財産を利用し合うことにより国際標準を形成したりすることなどを指す。 - 経済産業省
  • Article 29 A person who, without knowledge of a design in an application for design registration, created a design identical or similar to the said design, or a person who, without knowledge of a design in an application for design registration, learned of the design from a person who created a design identical or similar to the said design, and has been working the design or a design similar thereto or preparing for the working of the design or a design similar thereto in Japan at the time of the filing of the application for design registration (where the application for design registration is deemed to have been filed at the time of submission of the written amendment of proceedings under Article 9-2 or 17-3(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 50(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 57(1)), at the time of filing the original application or the written amendment of proceedings), shall have a non-exclusive license on the design right, only to the extent of the design and the purpose of such business worked or prepared.
    第二十九条　意匠登録出願に係る意匠を知らないで自らその意匠若しくはこれに類似する意匠の創作をし、又は意匠登録出願に係る意匠を知らないでその意匠若しくはこれに類似する意匠の創作をした者から知得して、意匠登録出願の際（第九条の二の規定により、又は第十七条の三第一項（第五十条第一項（第五十七条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により、その意匠登録出願が手続補正書を提出した時にしたものとみなされたときは、もとの意匠登録出願の際又は手続補正書を提出した際）現に日本国内においてその意匠又はこれに類似する意匠の実施である事業をしている者又はその事業の準備をしている者は、その実施又は準備をしている意匠及び事業の目的の範囲内において、その意匠登録出願に係る意匠権について通常実施権を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (1) Where a complete specification is amended after becoming open to public inspection, damages shall not be awarded, and an order shall not be made for an account of profits, in respect of any infringement of the patent before the date of the decision or order allowing or directing the amendment: (a) unless the court is satisfied that the specification without the amendment was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge; or (b) if the claim of the specification that was infringed is a claim mentioned under subsection 114(1).
    (1) 完全明細書が公衆の閲覧に供された後で補正された場合は，当該補正を許可し若しくは指示する決定又は命令が行われる日前の特許侵害に関しては，損害賠償を認めてはならず，かつ，利益の返還を命じる命令を出してはならないが，それについては， (a) 補正前の明細書が，誠実に，かつ，適切な技量と知識をもって作成されていると裁判所が認めていないこと，又は (b) 明細書中の侵害を受けたクレームが，第114(1)条に記載したクレームであること， を条件とする。 - 特許庁
  • (3) Unless otherwise directed by the Court, the Registrar, in lieu of appearing and being heard, may submit to the Court a statement in writing signed by him - (a) giving particulars in relation to the matter in issue; (b) of the grounds of any decision given by him affecting the matter in issue; (c) of the practice of the Patent Registration Office in like cases; or (d) of such other matters relevant to the issues and within his knowledge as Registrar, as he thinks fit, and such statement shall be deemed to form part of the evidence in Court.
    (3)裁判所による別段の指示がある場合を除き，登録官は，出頭して聴聞を受ける代わりに，次に掲げる事項に関する，本人が署名した陳述書を裁判所に提出することができる。 (a)争点事項の詳細 (b)登録官が下した，争点事項に影響する決定の根拠 (c)類似事件における特許登録局の慣行，又は (d)争点に関連しており，かつ，登録官の知る範囲内にある他の事項であって，登録官が適当と考えるもの かつ，上記の陳述書は，裁判所における証拠の一部を構成するものとみなす。 - 特許庁
  • (2) Unless otherwise directed by the Court, the Registrar, in lieu of appearing and being heard, may submit to the Court a statement in writing signed by him, giving particulars of the proceedings before him in relation of the matter in issue or of the grounds of any decision given by him affecting the same or of the practice of the office in like cases, or of such other matters relevant to the issues, and within his knowledge as Registrar, as he thinks fit, and such statement shall be deemed to form part of the evidence in the proceedings.
    (2) 裁判所が別段の指示をする場合を除いて，登録官は，出廷し聴聞を受ける代わりに，裁判所に対して，争点となっている事項に関する自己の下での手続，当該事項に影響を及ぼす自己が行った決定の理由，類似の事例に関する商標局の慣行，その他適当と考える当該問題に関係する事項であって自己の知識内にあるものについての詳細を述べた自己の署名入り陳述書を提出することができ，当該陳述書は，法的手続における証拠の一部を構成するとみなされる。 - 特許庁
  • While an invention relating to a therapeutic agent for a specified purpose, which contains compounds defined by certain properties as active ingredients, is comprehensively claimed, the disclosure in the detailed explanation of the invention supports the use for such specified purpose with regard to only a small portion of the claimed compounds; the content disclosed in the detailed explanation of the invention can neither be expanded nor generalized to the scope of the claimed invention even in light of the common general knowledge as of the filing.
    請求項には、性質により規定された化合物を有効成分とする特定用途の治療剤の発明が包括的に記載されているが、発明の詳細な説明には、請求項において有効成分として規定された化合物のうち、ごくわずかな具体的な化合物について特定用途を裏付ける記載がされているにすぎず、出願時の技術常識に照らしても、請求項に係る発明の範囲まで、発明の詳細な説明において開示された内容を拡張ないし一般化できるとはいえない場合。 - 特許庁
  • As a medicinal invention resides in technical field where it is generally difficult to infer how to make and use a material on the basis of its structure and its name, normally one or more representative embodiments or working examples are necessary in order to state the detailed explanation of the invention so as to enable a person skilled in the art to work the invention, except the case where a person skilled in the art can manufacture the compounds etc. and can use the compounds etc. for medicinal use, in the light of common general technical knowledge as of the filing.
    医薬発明は、一般に物の構造や名称からその物をどのように作り、又はどのように使用するかを理解することが比較的困難な技術分野に属する発明であることから、当業者がその発明を実施することができるように発明の詳細な説明を記載するためには、出願時の技術常識から、当業者が化合物等を製造又は取得することができ、かつ、その化合物等を医薬用途に使用することができる場合を除き、通常、一つ以上の代表的な実施例が必要である。 - 特許庁
  • If the description, etc. of the foreign language application contains new matters beyond the original text, such an application is subject to refusal or invalidation. However, in light of the following, it is unnecessary for the examiner to compare the description, etc. with the foreign language document in every case: i) it is highly probable that the contents of the foreign language document coincide with the contents of the description, etc.; and ii) the inconsistency between the foreign language document and the description, etc. can be found by solely examining the description, etc. in light of the conformity among descriptions and common general knowledge.
    外国語書面出願の明細書等に原文新規事項がある場合は、その出願は、拒絶理由・無効理由を有していることになるが、①外国語書面と明細書等の内容は一致している蓋然性は極めて高いこと、②外国語書面と上記明細書等の不一致は、他の記載との整合性や技術常識等に照らして明細書等を審査すればこれを発見することが可能と考えられること、等を踏まえると、審査官は全件について外国語書面と明細書等の照合を行う必要はない。 - 特許庁
  • I told him (the chairman) that the FSA intends to take appropriate measures to deal with the growing wave of failures and voluntary liquidations, and I sought his understanding on my proposed measures, including the moratorium scheme. As the chairman expressed his understanding, I asked him to give me his opinions and advice as to how we can draft a good bill based on the banking industry's knowledge of the practical affairs of the banking business as we prepare to enact the bill, whose formal name has not yet been decided. He expressed his willingness to do so, and as he is a quick decision maker, he proposed that consultations be started next week. For my part, I proposed next Wednesday as the starting date in light of our schedule. Several representatives from the Japanese Bankers Association, which is comprised of second-regional banks and larger banks, will hold consultations with our senior vice minister and parliamentary secretary. The chairman said, “As we will send several representatives to you, please listen to our explanations of the current situation and our opinions,” and we agreed on next Wednesday as the starting date. I instructed the senior vice minister to deal with this matter appropriately.
    それと、先ほども経済産業大臣に会いまして、既にワーキングチームに経済産業省の政務官が加わって一緒に検討していただいておりますけれども、中小企業の方々の代表者、ぜひ経済産業省のほうで、ひとつこれを選んでいただいて、うちのそうした副大臣、政務官に意見、要望、知恵をいただく、そういうことをひとつお願いしたいと言ったらば、「分かりました。 - 金融庁
  • The last holdout was Slovakia, which is a former communist country located in East Europe and is where per-capital national income is lower than in Greece - I am speaking from second-hand knowledge, to tell the truth, as I have not visited Slovakia - and people in that country are wondering why they have to bail out Greece, where income is higher. Therefore, the ruling coalition was divided, but a compromise has been reached following the cabinet's pledge to resign en masse and move up the date of a general election. That, I think, is a big step forward.
    あとはスロバキアでしたが、ここは17か国のユーロの中で、東欧でかつて共産圏でしたから、所得もギリシャに比べれば低いということがございまして、率直に言えば、これは受売りで、スロバキアに行っていませんけれども、一人ひとりの国民所得の低い国が、何で高いギリシャを助けねばならないのかという意見があって、あそこも与党が分裂したようでございますが、総理大臣が総辞職を約束し、選挙を前倒しにするということで、解決、妥協したようでございますから、そういった意味で大きな前進だとは思います。 - 金融庁
  • As third parties, we intend to select individuals with specialized knowledge, experts, individuals who would be satisfactory to the general public and specialists who would be convincing to professionals in the financial sector. It would be extremely impolite to would-be members for me to make any comments before creating the third-party inspection committee; with this in mind, we will establish the third-party inspection committee in an appropriate manner.
    第三者と申しましても専門的知識のある人、有識者の人、世間も納得していただける方、あるいは金融界の方々も納得していただけるような専門家も人選したいと思っていますので、その辺に応えていけるのではないかと思っております。私が第三者の検証委員会をつくる前に予断を持って言うことは、委員になっていただく方に関して非常に失礼なことになりますので、そういうことを想像しながら、きちんと第三者の検証委員会をつくっていきたいと思っております。 - 金融庁
  • Does the Customer Explanation Manual exhaustively cover the procedures for Customer Explanation, including the detailed procedures concerning the explanation of important matters suited to the knowledge and experience as well as the status of assets of the Customer, in accordance with the contents and method of the financial institution's business? Are those procedures stipulated in detail in an easy-to-understand manner? For example, does the Customer Explanation Manual enable persons in charge of Customer Explanation to provide explanations to and deal with the Customer in an appropriate and sufficient manner by stipulating the following matters according to the characteristics of the relevant Transaction and product?7
    顧客説明マニュアルの内容は、金融機関の営む業務の内容及び方法に応じた、顧客の知識、経験及び財産の状況を踏まえた重要な事項の説明の具体的な手続を含む顧客説明の手続を網羅し、詳細かつ平易に規定されているか。例えば、顧客説明マニュアルにその取引・商品の内容に応じ以下の点を記載する等の方法により、顧客説明を行う者が適切かつ十分な顧客説明及び顧客への対応等を行うことができるものとなっているか。 - 金融庁
  • Out of the technical features common to the invention claimed in claim 1 before the amendment and the invention claimed in claim ① after the amendment, "cell-phone handset comprising means for receiving TV broadcasts" does not make any contribution to the prior art in light of cited document 1. However, "cell-phone handset comprising means for receiving TV broadcasts and a means for recording that can compress and record received TV broadcast data" makes a contribution to the prior art in light of common general technical knowledge as of the filing and cited documents 1 and 2.
    補正前の請求項1 に係る発明と補正後の請求項①に係る発明に共通する技術的特徴のうち、「ＴＶ放送受信手段を有する携帯電話機」は、引用文献1 に照らして先行技術に対する貢献をもたらさないが、「ＴＶ放送受信手段と、受信ＴＶ放送データを圧縮して記録する記録手段を有する携帯電話機」は、出願時の技術常識及び引用文献1、2 に照らして先行技術に対する貢献をもたらすため、特別な技術的特徴である。 - 特許庁
  • Unless otherwise directed by the court, the Registrar may instead of appearing submit to the court a statement in writing signed by him, giving particulars of ? any proceedings before him in relation to the matter in issue; the grounds of any decision given by him affecting it; the practice of the registry in like cases; or such matters relevant to the issues and within his knowledge as Registrar as he thinks fit, and the statement shall be deemed to form part of the evidence in the proceedings.
    裁判所が別途命令する場合を除き，登録官は，出廷に代えて，次の事項を記載した陳述書に自己の署名を付して裁判所に提出することができる。争点となっている事項に関し登録官に対しなされた手続，当該事項に影響を与える登録官が下した決定の理由。同様な事例における登録簿の運用，又は，当該事項に関連し，かつ，登録官自身の知見の範囲内で適切と判断する事項，又，当該陳述書は当該訴訟手続における証拠の一部を構成するものと見なされる。 - 特許庁
  • 3. A person who, because of his professional, scientific or other special skill or knowledge, is summoned to appear before the registrar as a witness shall be paid -- (a) if the person is remunerated in his occupation by wages, salary or fees, an amount equal to the amount of wages, salary or fees not paid to the person because of his attendance before the Registrar for that purpose, but such amount should not exceed $150 per day; or (b) in any other case, an amount of not less than $100 but not more than $150.00 for each day on which he so attends.
    3. 専門的，科学的若しくはその他の特別な技能又は知識を有する者であるために証人として登録官の面前に出頭するよう召喚された者は，次の額の支払を受ける。 (a) その者が自己の職業上，賃金，給料又は料金により報酬を得ている場合は，当該目的での登録官の面前への出頭のために支払われない賃金，給料又は料金の額に等しい額。ただし，当該額は，1日当たり150ドルを超えない。又は， (b) その他の場合は，その者が出席した各日当たり100ドル以上，150ドル以下とする。 - 特許庁
  • (4) Where in any such proceedings it is found that a patent is only partially valid, the court shall not grant relief by way of costs or expenses except where the proprietor of the patent proves that the specification of the patent was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge, and in that event the court may grant relief in respect of that part of the patent which is valid and has been so used, subject to the discretion of the court as to costs and expenses.
    (4) 当該手続において，特許が一部に限り有効と認定された場合は，裁判所は，その特許の所有者が特許明細書は善意でかつ適切な技能及び知識をもって作成されたことを立証する場合を除き，費用又は経費による救済を認めないものとし，かつ，当該所有者がそれを立証した場合は，裁判所は，有効であり，かつ，特許の当該部分に関しては，費用及び経費について裁判所の裁量に従うことを条件として，救済を認めることができる。 - 特許庁
  • (4) Where an amendment of the specification of a patent has been allowed under any of the provisions of this Act, the court or the Registrar shall not, in proceedings for an infringement of the patent committed before the decision to allow the amendment, award any damages, make an order for an account of profits or grant any other relief (including, in proceedings before the court, an injunction) unless the court or the Registrar is satisfied that the specification of the patent as published was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge.
    (4) 本法の何れかの規定に基づいて特許明細書の補正が認められている場合は，裁判所又は登録官は，当該補正を認める決定前に犯された当該特許侵害に関する手続において，損害賠償を裁定し，利益の返還を命じ又は他の何れかの救済(裁判所での手続の場合は，差止命令を含む)を認めてはならない。ただし，裁判所又は登録官が公告された当該特許明細書は善意でかつ適切な技術と知識をもって作成されたと認めた場合は，この限りでない。 - 特許庁
  • After determining what is described in a claimed invention and one or more cited inventions, one cited invention most suitable for the reasoning is selected. And comparison of the claimed invention with a cited invention is made, and the identicalness and the difference in matters defining the inventions are clarified. Then, the reasoning for lacking an inventive step of the claimed invention is attempted on the basis of contents of the selected invention above, other cited inventions (including well-known or commonly used art) and the common general knowledge.
    具体的には、請求項に係る発明及び引用発明（一又は複数）を認定した後、論理づけに最も適した一の引用発明を選び、請求項に係る発明と引用発明を対比して、請求項に係る発明の発明特定事項と引用発明を特定するための事項との一致点・相違点を明らかにした上で、この引用発明や他の引用発明（周知・慣用技術も含む）の内容及び技術常識から、請求項に係る発明に対して進歩性の存在を否定し得る論理の構築を試みる。 - 特許庁
  • After determining what is described in a claimed invention and one or more cited inventions, one cited invention most suitable for the reasoning is selected. And comparison of the claimed invention with a cited invention is made, and the identicalness and the difference in matters defining the inventions are clarified. Then, the reasoning for lacking an inventive step of the claimed invention is attempted on the basis of contents of the selected invention above, other cited inventions (including well-known or commonly used art) and the common general knowledge.
    請求項に係る発明及び引用発明（一又は複数）を認定した後、論理づけに最も適した一の引用発明を選び、請求項に係る発明と引用発明を対比して、請求項に係る発明の発明特定事項と引用発明を特定するための事項との一致点・相違点を明らかにした上で、この引用発明や他の引用発明（周知・慣用技術も含む）の内容及び技術常識から、請求項に係る発明に対して進歩性の存在を否定し得る論理の構築を試みる。 - 特許庁
  • Unless otherwise directed by the court, the Registrar may instead of appearing, submit to the court a statement in writing signed by him, giving particulars of-- (a) any proceedings before him in relation to the matter in issue; (b) the grounds of any decision given by him; (c) the practice of the Registrar or the Registry in like cases, if any; and (d) such matters relevant to the issues involved in the proceedings and within his knowledge as the Registrar thinks fit, and the statement shall be deemed to form part of the evidence in the proceedings before the court.
    裁判所により別段の指示がない限り，登録官は出頭する代わりに，(a) 争点事項に関する登録官への手続，(b) 登録官がする決定の理由，(c) 同様の事件における登録官又は登録部門の慣行(もしあれば)，及び (d) 手続における争点に関連し，かつ，登録官の知見の範囲内で適切と認める事項，についての詳細を述べた陳述書を，自己の署名を付して提出することができ，かつ，この陳述書は，裁判所への手続における証拠の一部を構成するものとみなされる。 - 特許庁
  • Specific actions for greater transparency, stronger accountability, improved institutional governance deeper country ownership, more decentralization and use of country systems where appropriate, and enhanced procurement guidelines, new ways of managing and tracking results and financial contributions, strengthen knowledge management, ensuring the right human resources with appropriate diversity, better implementing environmental and social safeguards, sound risk management, and ensuring financial sustainability with pricing linked to expenses, and a commitment to continue to reduce administrative expenses and make them more transparent.
    より高い透明性，より強固な説明責任，改善された組織のガバナンス，より深い各国のオーナーシップ，更なる分権化及び適当な場合におけるカントリーシステムの活用，強化された調達ガイドライン，成果及び財政貢献を管理し追跡するための新しい手法，知識管理の強化，適切な多様性を有する適切な人材の確保，より良い環境・社会的セーフガードの実施，健全なリスク管理，融資金利を費用とリンクさせることによる財務の持続可能性確保，行政費用の継続的な削減及びその透明性の向上へのコミットメントに関する個別の行動。 - 財務省
  • In the case of persons who have been hired to perform a function other than a creative or inventive function, the industrial property rights shall belong to the creator or inventor thereof, with the exception that, in the case when performing said creative or inventive activity they have evidently benefited from knowledge acquired during their stay in the enterprise that employed them or they have used means provided by said enterprise, these rights shall belong to their employer, without prejudice of the additional compensation to the worker or the person who performed the service referred to in Sec. 69 of the Law.
    創造的又は発明的な性質の業務以外の業務を行うために雇用されている者が生み出した発明については，産業特権は当該創造者に属する。ただし，そのような発明に関して当該発明者がその雇用されている企業において取得した知識が明白に寄与している場合又は当該企業によって提供された手段を利用した場合は，産業特権は使用者に属する。この場合は，発明を行った従業者又は請負人は，法第69条に規定する追加的な報酬を受け取る権利を有する。 - 特許庁
  • However, where an invention is made by a salaried person during the execution of his functions or in the field of activity of the company or by reason of knowledge or use of technologies or specific means of the company or of data acquired by the company, the employer shall be entitled, subject to the conditions and the time limits laid down by a Conseil d’Etat decree, to have assigned to him the ownership or enjoyment of all or some of the rights in the patent protecting his employee’s invention.
    ただし，発明が，従業者の職務遂行の間に，又は会社の業務の範囲内で，又は会社の技術若しくは特定の手段若しくは会社が取得したデータについての知識若しくは使用を理由として従業者によってなされている場合は，使用者は，国務院布告によって定められた条件及び期限に従うことを条件として，従業者の発明を保護する特許に係る権利について，その所有権，又は権利の全部若しくは一部の享受を自己に移転させる権原を有するものとする。 - 特許庁
  • Where in any such proceedings it is found that a patent is only partially valid, the court shall not grant relief by way of compensation, costs or expenses except where the proprietor of the patent proves that the specification of the patent was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge, and in that event the court may grant relief in respect of that part of the patent which is valid and has been so used, subject to the discretion of the court as to costs and expenses and as to the date from which compensation should be awarded.
    当該手続において，特許が部分的にのみ有効であることが判明した場合は，裁判所は，補償，費用又は経費によって救済を与えない。ただし，特許明細書が善意で，かつ，適切な熟練と知識を以って構成されたことを特許所有者が証明する場合は，この限りでない。その場合は，裁判所は，裁判所の費用，経費及び補償が裁定される起点日について裁判所の裁量に従うことを条件として，有効であり，かつ，そのように実施された特許の部分について救済を与えることができる。 - 特許庁
  • Where in any such proceedings it is found that a patent is only partially valid, the court shall not grant relief by way of damages or costs, except where the plaintiff proves that the specification for the patent was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge, and in that event the court may grant relief in respect of that part of the patent which is valid and infringed, subject to the discretion of the court as to costs and as to the date from which damages should be reckoned.
    当該手続において，特許が部分的にのみ有効と判明した場合は，裁判所は，損害賠償金又は費用により救済を与えてはならない。ただし，特許明細書が善意で，かつ，適正な熟練と知識を以って構成されたことを原告が証明する場合を除く。そのような場合は，裁判所は，費用及び損害賠償額の起算日について裁判所の裁量に従うことを条件として，当該特許の有効であり，かつ，侵害されたと認められる部分に関して救済を与えることができる。 - 特許庁
  • Unless otherwise directed by the Court, the Controller may, in lieu of appearing and being heard, submit to the Court a statement in writing, signed by him, giving particulars of the proceedings before him in relation to the matter in issue, or of the grounds of any decision given by him affecting the same, or of the practice of the Office in like cases, or of such matters relevant to the issues, and within his knowledge as Controller, as he shall think fit, and such statement shall be deemed to form part of the evidence in the proceedings.
    裁判所が別段の命令をしない限り，長官は，裁判所に出廷し，かつ，審理を受ける代わりに，争点となる事項に関する自己の処理若しくは同様の事項に影響する自己が与えた決定の理由，又は同様の事例についての庁の慣行，又は当該争点に関係する事項の詳細であって，長官としての知見の範囲内で自己が適切と認めるものを示す自らが署名した陳述書を裁判所に提出することができる。また，当該陳述書は当該訴訟において証拠の一部を構成するものとみなす。 - 特許庁
  • The Patent Act Article 36(4) (ii) prescribes the effect that the source of the information concerning the invention known to the public through publication such as the name of the publication and others (hereinafter referred to as “information on prior art documents”) must be described in the detailed description of the invention when the person requesting the grant of a patent has knowledge of any invention(s) (inventions as provided in Article 29(1) (iii)) related to the said invention, that has been known to the public through publication at the time of filing of the patent application (hereinafter referred to as “Requirements for disclosure of information on prior art documents.”).
    特許法第36条第4項第2号は、文献公知発明(第29条第1項第3号に掲げる発明)のうち、特許を受けようとする者(出願人)が特許出願の時に特許を受けようとする発明に関連する発明を知っている場合には、その関連する発明が記載された刊行物の名称その他のその文献公知発明に関する情報の所在(以下、「先行技術文献情報」という。)を発明の詳細な説明に記載しなければならない旨を(以下、「先行技術文献情報開示要件」という。)、規定したものである。 - 特許庁
  • For details, after the claimed invention and one or more cited inventions have been identified, one of the cited inventions most suitable for the reasoning is selected, and the claimed invention and cited invention are compared to find the correspondences and differences between the matters used to specify the claimed invention and matters used to specify the cited invention. Then, reasons for denying the presence of an inventive step of the claimed invention are sought based on the details of this or other cited invention(s) (including well known and commonly used arts) and the common general knowledge.
    具体的には、請求項に係る発明及び引用発明(一又は複数)を認定した後、論理づけに最も適した一の引用発明を選び、請求項に係る発明と引用発明を対比して、請求項に係る発明の発明特定事項と引用発明を特定するための事項との一致点・相違点を明らかにした上で、この引用発明や他の引用発明(周知・慣用技術も含む)の内容及び技術常識から、請求項に係る発明に対して進歩性の存在を否定し得る論理の構築を試みる。 - 特許庁
  • Therefore, for example, when the chemical substance is represented by the chemical substance name or the chemical structure formula as part of alternatives in the Markush-type claim of the earlier application, and the claim is not stated such that a person skilled in the art may produce said chemical substance, considering the common general knowledge at the filing date of the earlier application, and said chemical substance is not “the earlier application invention.” In addition, this does not mean that the invention according to the claim of the earlier application breaches enablement provided in Article 36 (4) (i).
    したがって、例えば先願の請求項のマーカッシュ形式の選択肢の一部として化学物質名又は化学構造式により化学物質が示されている場合において、当業者が先願の出願時の技術常識を参酌しても、当該化学物質を製造できることが明らかであるように記載されていないときは、当該化学物質は「先願発明」とはならない(なお、これは、先願の請求項に係る発明について第36条第4項第1号の実施可能要件違反となることを意味しない)。 - 特許庁
  • Concretely, after finding the claimed invention and one or more cited inventions, one cited invention most suitable for the reasoning is selected.1 And comparison of the claimed invention with the cited invention is made, and the identicalness and the difference in matters defining the inventions are clarified. Then, the reasoning for lacking an inventive step of the claimed invention is attempted on the basis of the contents of the selected invention, other cited inventions (including well-known or commonly used art) and the common general knowledge.
    具体的には、請求項に係る発明及び引用発明（一又は複数）を認定した後、論理づけに最も適した一の引用発明を選び、請求項に係る発明と引用発明を対比して、請求項に係る発明の発明特定事項と引用発明を特定するための事項との一致点及び相違点を明らかにした上で、この引用発明や他の引用発明（周知・慣用技術も含む）の内容及び技術常識から、請求項に係る発明に対して進歩性の存在を否定し得る論理の構築を試みる。 - 特許庁
  • Therefore, if "a person skilled in the art" who is supposed to have ordinary skill cannot understand how to carry out the invention on the basis of teachings in the specification (excluding claims) and drawings taking into consideration the common general knowledge as of the filing, then, such a description of the invention should be deemed insufficient for enabling such a person to carry out the invention. For example, if a large amount of trials and errors or complicated experimentation are needed to find a way of carrying out the invention beyond the reasonable extent that can be expected from a person skilled in the art who is supposed to have ordinary skill, the detailed description of the invention is not described in such a manner that enables a person skilled in the art to carry out the invention.
    したがって、明細書及び図面に記載された発明の実施についての教示と出願時の技術常識とに基づいて、当業者が発明を実施しようとした場合に、どのように実施するかが理解できないとき(例えば、どのように実施するかを発見するために、当業者に期待しうる程度を超える試行錯誤や複雑高度な実験等を行う必要があるとき)には、当業者が実施することができる程度に発明の詳細な説明が記載されていないことになる。 - 特許庁
  • Where the employer assumes ownership or reserves the right of exploitation of an invention, the worker shall be entitled to equitable economic compensation determined in relation to the industrial and commercial significance of the invention, due account being taken of the value of the means or knowledge made available by the undertaking and the contributions made by the worker himself; in the event of the employer licensing the invention to third parties, the inventor may claim payment from the owner of the patent of up to 50% of the royalties actually charged by the latter.
    使用者が，発明の所有権を取得するか又はライセンスを留保する場合は，従業者は，発明の産業的及び商業的意義に均等の経済的補償の決定を得る権利を有し，その際には，事業体により利用可能とされた手段又は知識の価値及び従業者個人によりなされた貢献度につき，相応の斟酌がなされる。使用者が発明を第三者にライセンス許諾する場合は，発明者は，特許の所有者に対して，特許の所有者が実際に請求するロイヤルティの50％までの支払を請求することができる。 - 特許庁
  • Article 463 (1) In the cases provided for in paragraph (1) of the preceding article, shareholders without knowledge with respect to the fact that the total book value of the Monies, Etc. delivered to shareholders as a result of the acts listed in each item of Article 461(1) exceeds the Distributable Amount as at the day when such act takes effect shall not be obligated to respond to the remedy over that the Executing Persons who made the payment of monies under paragraph (1) of the preceding article or the persons provided for in each item of that paragraph have against such shareholders, with respect to the Monies, Etc. which such shareholders received.
    第四百六十三条　前条第一項に規定する場合において、株式会社が第四百六十一条第一項各号に掲げる行為により株主に対して交付した金銭等の帳簿価額の総額が当該行為がその効力を生じた日における分配可能額を超えることにつき善意の株主は、当該株主が交付を受けた金銭等について、前条第一項の金銭を支払った業務執行者及び同項各号に定める者からの求償の請求に応ずる義務を負わない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (e) the amount equivalent to 0.0002 percent of the total sum of transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act, in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System without carrying out solicitation, in the business year in which such total sum was the greatest from among each business year and each business year starting within two years prior to the commencement of the relevant business year;
    ホ　各事業年度及び当該事業年度開始の日前二年以内に開始した各事業年度のうち法第二条第八項第一号に規定する取引のうち、商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者から商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引金額の合計額の最も高い事業年度における当該合計額の百万分の二に相当する金額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (f) the amount equivalent to 0.0002 percent of the total sum of transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (ii) of the Act, in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System without carrying out solicitation, in the business year in which such total sum was the greatest from among each business year and each business year starting within two years prior to the commencement of the relevant business year;
    ヘ　各事業年度及び当該事業年度開始の日前二年以内に開始した各事業年度のうち法第二条第八項第二号に規定する取引のうち、商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者から商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引金額の合計額の最も高い事業年度における当該合計額の百万分の二に相当する金額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (g) the amount equivalent to 0.0002 percent of the total sum of transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iii) of the Act, in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System without carrying out solicitation, in the business year in which such total sum was the greatest from among each business year and each business year starting within two years prior to the commencement of the relevant business year;
    ト　各事業年度及び当該事業年度開始の日前二年以内に開始した各事業年度のうち法第二条第八項第三号に規定する取引のうち、商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者から商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引金額の合計額の最も高い事業年度における当該合計額の百万分の二に相当する金額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (h) the amount equivalent to 0.002 percent of the total sum of transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iv) of the Act, in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System without carrying out solicitation, in the business year in which such total sum was the greatest from among each business year and each business year starting within two years prior to the commencement of the relevant business year;
    チ　各事業年度及び当該事業年度開始の日前二年以内に開始した各事業年度のうち法第二条第八項第四号に規定する取引のうち、商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者から商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の対価の額の合計額の最も高い事業年度における当該合計額の十万分の二に相当する金額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) Where a judgment upholding a request under the provisions of the preceding paragraph has become final and binding, if a creditor (excluding one who is the settlor) who has a claim pertaining to an obligation covered by the trust property had no knowledge at the time when the creditor acquired the claim of the fact that would harm the creditor, the settlor shall be liable to perform the obligation covered by the trust property to the creditor who holds such a claim; provided, however, that such performance shall be limited to the value of the property to be transferred from the trustee to the settlor by reason of the rescission under the provisions of said paragraph.
    ２　前項の規定による請求を認容する判決が確定した場合において、信託財産責任負担債務に係る債権を有する債権者（委託者であるものを除く。）が当該債権を取得した時において債権者を害すべき事実を知らなかったときは、委託者は、当該債権を有する債権者に対し、当該信託財産責任負担債務について弁済の責任を負う。ただし、同項の規定による取消しにより受託者から委託者に移転する財産の価額を限度とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
＜前へ 1 2 .... 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 次へ＞

例文データの著作権について