「knowledge」を含む例文一覧(8344)
＜前へ 1 2 .... 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167- (1) Where a person at the priority date of the patent application - (a) was in good faith in Malaysia making the product or using the process which is the subject of the invention claimed in the application; (b) had in good faith in Malaysia made serious preparations towards the making of the product or using the process referred to in paragraph (a), he shall have the right, despite the grant of the patent, to exploit the patented invention: Provided that the product in question is made, or the process in question is used, by the said person in Malaysia: Provided further that he can prove, if the invention was disclosed under the circumstances referred to in paragraphs 14(3)(a), (b) or (c) that his knowledge of the invention was not a result of such disclosure. [Am. Act A648: s.22; Am. Act A863: s.26]
(1)人が，特許出願の優先日において，(a)マレーシアにおいて善意で，その出願においてクレームされている発明の主題である製品を製造していたか又はその主題である方法を使用していた場合，(b)マレーシアにおいて善意で，(a)にいう製品を製造する又は方法を使用するために，真摯な準備をしていた場合は，その出願に対する特許の付与に拘らず，当該人は，その特許発明を実施する権利を有するものとする。ただし，前記の者によってマレーシアにおいて，その製品が生産されること，又はその方法が使用されることを条件とする。更に，その発明が第14条(3)(a)，(b)又は(c)にいう事情の下で開示された場合は，当該人が，その発明についての同人の知識がその開示の結果でなかったことを証明できることを条件とする。［法律A648:s.22，法律A863:s.26による改正］ - 特許庁 - The applicant shall have all the rights of a patentee under Sec. 76, of the IP CODE against any person who, without his authorization, exercised any of the rights conferred under Section 71 of said law in relation to the invention claimed in the published application, as if a patent has been granted for that invention: Provided, That the said person had: (a) Actual knowledge that the invention that he was using was the subject matter of a published application; or (b) Received written notice that the invention that he was using was the subject matter of a published application being identified in the said notice by its serial number: Provided, That the action may not be filed until after the grant of a patent on the published application and within four years from the commission of the acts complained of (Sec. 46, IP CODE).
出願人は，公開された出願においてクレームしている発明について，IP法第71条に基づいて付与される権利の何れかを出願人の許可を得ないで行使した者に対しては，その発明について特許が付与されている場合と同様に，同法第76条に基づく特許権者の権利のすべてを有するものとする。ただし，その者が次の何れかに該当することを条件とする。 (a)その者が，自己が実施していた発明が公開された出願の主題であることを実際に知っていたこと (b)その者が，自己が実施していた発明が出願番号により特定される公開された出願の主題である旨の通知書を受領していたこと。ただし，訴訟は，公開された出願に特許が付与されるまで，かつ，訴の対象である行為がなされてから4年以内は提起することができない。(IP法第46条) - 特許庁 - I was Minister for Financial Services, while Minister Yosano had the experience of serving as the Minister for International Trade and Industry. Minister Yosano strongly requested that two of us be allowed to join the debate at that time, when the Kan cabinet was in office, and as Mr. Kaieda, who was Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry at that time, agreed to that, we joined the debate on the draft of the scheme halfway through it. Therefore, I have certain knowledge about this matter. In relation to the support for Tokyo Electric Power, what kind of cooperation the company seeks from stakeholders and how stakeholders, including financial institutions, respond are matters to be determined through consultations between private business operators, so my understanding is that the Financial Services Agency is not in a position to make comments. In any case, regarding the compensation issue, it is important to pay damages compensation in a prompt and appropriate manner, and another important thing is, as you know, to avoid causing unnecessary, unexpected adverse effects on the stability of the financial and capital markets, on the principal premise that stable electricity supply should be ensured. We will continue to carefully monitor market developments.
そのときの経過から私はある程度知っておりますけれども、東京電力に対する支援については、東京電力がステークホルダーに対してどのような協力を求めるか、それに対して金融機関を含むステークホルダーがどのように対応するかについては、民間事業者間で話し合われるべき事柄で、当局としてはお答えする立場にはないと認識しておりまして、いずれにいたしましても、東京電力の賠償問題については、迅速かつ適切な損害賠償の実施や、それからもう一個大事な点は、ご存じのように、電力の安定供給を確保することを大前提としつつ、金融・資本市場の安定に不要・不測の悪影響を生じさせないことが重要であり、引き続き市場の動向に注視してまいりたいと思っております。 - 金融庁 - In the past, the Ministry of Finance and the Japanese External Trade Organization, which is an extra-governmental organization of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) or the former Ministry of International Trade and Industry, would strive to promote exports but, as Japan's trade surplus grew, it embarked on promoting imports in turn. Anyway, it is an organization that boasts knowledge of trade issues that it has garnered over time. Then there is the Japan Bank for International Cooperation, which is one example of the wholesale integration of policy-based financial institutions during the Koizumi administration that was carried out under the banner of "From public to private." I hear, however, that there is talk of separating JBIC – only JBIC, which has actually played an extremely significant role in the expansion of the Japanese economy overseas after World War II – back to its original form, because it is arguably found to be somewhat different from the rest.
また、金融庁といたしましては、これまで財務省、経済産業省や日本貿易振興機構、これは昔で言う通産省の外郭団体でございまして、輸出振興ということを一生懸命やりましたが、途中から日本の貿易黒字が大きくなりまして、今度輸入振興ということをやり出しました。いずれにしても非常に貿易に関しては長年のノウハウを持っている団体でございます。それから国際協力銀行、これは小泉さんのときに「官から民へ」ということで官の政策金融機関をみんな合わせろという話でしたが、どうもJBICだけは少し色彩が違うということで、JBICだけ独自にまた昔のように離そうかという話もあると聞いていますけれども、これも日本の経済の海外進出に対して戦後、実は非常に大きな役割を果たしてきたのです。 - 金融庁 - In this sense, although the FSA has three separate functions - namely planning institutional frameworks, inspection (which in this context includes the monitoring of market developments and market transactions in the broad sense), and supervision of business sectors under its jurisdiction, exchanges, certified public accountants and other relevant parties - there is a common logic to all these functions. Nonetheless, planning institutional frameworks, inspection and supervision are different in nature. Thus, it is also important to ensure that common knowledge and standards are shared with regard to each business sector, and that a consistent logic is maintained when individual cases of institutional and supervisory matters are handled.
したがって、そういう意味では、この組織は制度の企画・立案、検査―検査という場合には広い意味でマーケットの市場動向、市場における取引の監視ということも含みますけれども、―そして、具体的な監督対象の業種、あるいは取引所や公認会計士等への監督と、こういった3つのファンクションに分かれているわけですけれども、このファンクションを貫くロジックというのは共有されていると思うのですが、制度の企画立案、検査、監督というのは、それぞれ仕事の性質も違いますので、そういう意味では業態ごとに3つのファンクションを貫くようなきちんとした知識とか、座標軸の共有ということも大事でしょうし、個別事案に対応する場合もそういった制度面の話、個別の監督の話における一貫性といいますか、そういうロジックがきちんと貫かれているといったことを確保するということも大事だと思っております。 - 金融庁 - The subject-matter defined by a claim in an application for a patent in Canada (the “pending application”) must not have been disclosed (a) more than one year before the filing date by the applicant, or by a person who obtained knowledge, directly or indirectly, from the applicant, in such a manner that the subject-matter became available to the public in Canada or elsewhere; (b) before the claim date by a person not mentioned in paragraph (a) in such a manner that the subject-matter became available to the public in Canada or elsewhere; (c) in an application for a patent that is filed in Canada by a person other than the applicant, and has a filing date that is before the claim date; or (d) in an application (the “co-pending application”) for a patent that is filed in Canada by a person other than the applicant and has a filing date that is on or after the claim date if
カナダ特許出願(以下「係属中の出願」と称する)におけるクレームで特定された主題は，次の開示がされていないことを要する: (a) 出願日より1年を超える前に，出願人により又は出願人から直接的か間接的かを問わず知った者により，カナダ又は他の場所において，その主題が公衆の利用に供される方法でされた開示 (b) クレーム日より前に，(a)に述べた者以外の者によりカナダ若しくは他の場所において，その主題が公衆の利用に供される方法でされた開示 (c) 出願人以外の者によりされ，かつ，その出願日がクレーム日より前であるカナダ特許出願においてされた開示 (d) 出願人以外の者によりされ，かつ，その出願日がクレーム日以後であるカナダ特許出願(以下「同時係属中の出願」と称する)においてされた開示であって，次の条件に該当するもの - 特許庁 - Article 49 (1) In the event that a prefectural governor acknowledges that a designated welfare service business operator for persons with disabilities does not satisfy the standard prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in paragraph 1 of Article 43 on employees' knowledge and skills and the number of employees, or does not operate business appropriately on designated welfare service pursuant to the standard concerning equipment and operation of designated welfare service business operators prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth paragraph 2 of the same Article, he/she may admonish such designated welfare service business operator with setting a time limit to comply with the standard prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in paragraph 1 of the same Article or to comply with the standard concerning equipment and operation of designated welfare service business operators for persons with disabilities prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of paragraph 2 set forth in the same Article.
第四十九条 都道府県知事は、指定障害福祉サービス事業者が、当該指定に係るサービス事業所の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第四十三条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準に適合しておらず、又は同条第二項の厚生労働省令で定める指定障害福祉サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準に従って適正な指定障害福祉サービスの事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定障害福祉サービス事業者に対し、期限を定めて、同条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、又は同条第二項の厚生労働省令で定める指定障害福祉サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) In the event that a prefectural governor acknowledges that an establisher of designated support facilities does not satisfy the standard prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of paragraph 1 set forth in Article 44 on knowledge and skills and the number of the employees of the facilities pertaining to such designation and Nozominosono, or does not operate business appropriately on in-facility welfare service for persons with disabilities pursuant to the standard concerning equipment and operation of designated support facilities for persons with disabilities, or others prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in paragraph 2 of the same Article, he/she may admonish such establisher of support facilities, etc. with setting a time limit to comply with the standard prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of paragraph 1 set forth in the same Article or to comply with the standard concerning equipment and operation of designated support facilities for persons with disabilities, or others prescribed in Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of paragraph 2 set forth in the same Article.
２ 都道府県知事は、指定障害者支援施設等の設置者が、当該指定に係る施設及びのぞみの園の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第四十四条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準に適合しておらず、又は同条第二項の厚生労働省令で定める指定障害者支援施設等の設備及び運営に関する基準に従って適正な施設障害福祉サービスの事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定障害者支援施設等の設置者に対し、期限を定めて、同条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、又は同条第二項の厚生労働省令で定める指定障害者支援施設等の設備及び運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) In addition to a creditor who holds a claim pertaining to an obligation covered by the trust property, where a trust has been created by the method set forth in Article 3, item (iii), if the settlor has created the trust with the knowledge that it would harm settlor's creditor(s), notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a person who holds a claim against the settlor (limited to cases where the settlor is a trustee) which has arisen prior to the creation of the trust may commence a execution, provisional seizure, provisional disposition or exercise of a security interest, or an auction, or may commence collection proceedings for delinquent national tax against property that belongs to the trust property; provided, however, that this shall not apply where there are beneficiaries at the time in question, and when all or some of those beneficiaries did not know, at the time when they became aware that they had been designated as beneficiaries or when they acquired beneficial interests, of the fact that the creditor would be harmed.
２ 第三条第三号に掲げる方法によって信託がされた場合において、委託者がその債権者を害することを知って当該信託をしたときは、前項の規定にかかわらず、信託財産責任負担債務に係る債権を有する債権者のほか、当該委託者（受託者であるものに限る。）に対する債権で信託前に生じたものを有する者は、信託財産に属する財産に対し、強制執行、仮差押え、仮処分若しくは担保権の実行若しくは競売又は国税滞納処分をすることができる。ただし、受益者が現に存する場合において、その受益者の全部又は一部が、受益者としての指定を受けたことを知った時又は受益権を譲り受けた時において債権者を害すべき事実を知らなかったときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 24-16 (1) When a prefectural governor finds that the establisher of a Designated Institution for Mentally Retarded Children, etc. fails to conform to the standards specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare referred to in Article 24-12 paragraph (1) in respect of the knowledge or skills of its employees of the institution pertaining to the referenced designation or its personnel staffing or fails to operate the Designated Institution for Mentally Retarded Children, etc. adequately in accordance with the standards on facilities and operation of designated retarded child institutions, etc. specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare referred to in paragraph (2) of the same Article, the prefectural governor may recommend the establisher of said Designated Institution for Mentally Retarded Children, etc. to comply with the standards specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare referred to in paragraph (1) of the same Article, or comply with the standards on facilities and operation of designated retarded child institutions, etc. specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare referred to in paragraph (2) of the same Article, by a due date to be specified.
第二十四条の十六 都道府県知事は、指定知的障害児施設等の設置者が、当該指定に係る施設の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第二十四条の十二第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準に適合しておらず、又は同条第二項の厚生労働省令で定める指定知的障害児施設等の設備及び運営に関する基準に従つて適正な指定知的障害児施設等の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定知的障害児施設等の設置者に対し、期限を定めて、同条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、又は同条第二項の厚生労働省令で定める指定知的障害児施設等の設備及び運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - b. Activities conducted based on a contract with a public or private organization in Japan (an organization conducting business activities that meet the requirements provided for by a Ministry of Justice ordinance of contributing to the development of industries related to information processing (information processing prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Act on Promotion of Information Processing (Act No. 90 of 1970); hereinafter the same shall apply) and which is an organization specifically designated by the Minister of Justice) of engaging in information-processing-related services which require technology and/or knowledge pertinent to natural science fields or human science fields at an office of such an organization (an office of the other organization in cases where he/she is dispatched to another organization by such an organization as a temporary worker as prescribed in Article 2, item (ii) of the Act on Ensuring Proper Operation of the Manpower Dispatching Business and Improvement of Working Conditions of a Temporary Worker (Act No. 88 of 1985)).
ロ 本邦の公私の機関（情報処理（情報処理の促進に関する法律（昭和四十五年法律第九十号）第二条第一項に規定する情報処理をいう。以下同じ。）に関する産業の発展に資するものとして法務省令で定める要件に該当する事業活動を行う機関であつて、法務大臣が指定するものに限る。）との契約に基づいて当該機関の事業所（当該機関から労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律（昭和六十年法律第八十八号）第二条第二号に規定する派遣労働者として他の機関に派遣される場合にあつては、当該他の機関の事業所）において自然科学又は人文科学の分野に属する技術又は知識を要する情報処理に係る業務に従事する活動 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (5) The term "Long-Term Care Support Specialist" as used in this Act means a person that provides consultation to a Person Requiring Long-Term Care or to a Person Requiring Support (herein referred to as a "Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc.") and communicates with and coordinates Municipalities, a person performing In-Home Services, a person performing Community-Based Service Business, a Facility Covered by Long-Term Care Insurance, a person performing Preventive Long-Term Care Service Business, a person performing Community-Based Preventive Long-Term Care, etc., in order for a Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., to be able to use appropriate In-Home Service, Community-Based Service, Facility Service, Preventive Long-Term Care Service, and Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care according to the mental and physical conditions, etc., of a Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., and who received Long-Term Care Support Specialist Certification as set forth in Article 69-7, paragraph (1) as a person possessing professional knowledge and skills regarding necessary support for a Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., to live an independent daily life.
５ この法律において「介護支援専門員」とは、要介護者又は要支援者（以下「要介護者等」という。）からの相談に応じ、及び要介護者等がその心身の状況等に応じ適切な居宅サービス、地域密着型サービス、施設サービス、介護予防サービス又は地域密着型介護予防サービスを利用できるよう市町村、居宅サービス事業を行う者、地域密着型サービス事業を行う者、介護保険施設、介護予防サービス事業を行う者、地域密着型介護予防サービス事業を行う者等との連絡調整等を行う者であって、要介護者等が自立した日常生活を営むのに必要な援助に関する専門的知識及び技術を有するものとして第六十九条の七第一項の介護支援専門員証の交付を受けたものをいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - In order to make more energetic activities of angel networks in Japan, it would be effective to form partnerships between such networks based in parts of Japan and help them share information about start-ups and best practices for angel network management. It would also be helpful to encourage them to interact with angel networks in the United States and other advanced angel networking countries and conduct surveys to learn their advanced skills to manage networks and angel investment techniques, such as convertible loan stock. Another effective way is to work to have angel investment activates understood by SME owners and other people who may potentially have interest in angel investment. Examination should be conducted on what the government should do to support such efforts. In the United States and Europe, some angel networks own venture capital funds, referred to as sidecar or affiliate funds, as a tool for making angel investments, and such funds are now becoming more common. In Japan, Nippon Angels Forum, an angel network, has a sidecar fund. On the other hand, some of the venture capital funds there which raise money mainly from retail investors provide services similar to those of angel networks. Such convergences of angel networks and venture capital may help angel investors learn the expertise venture capital funds have on venture investment, and in turn allow venture capitals to use the business experience people in angel networks have and knowledge and know-how experts there possess when they perform diligence or provide business advisory services.
近年、欧米においても、エンジェルネットワークが、サイドカー・ファンド、アフィリエイト・ファンドと呼ばれるベンチャーキャピタルファンドを保有して、これらファンドを通じたエンジェル投資を行うことが一般的になってきている。日本においても、日本エンジェルズ・フォーラムがサイドカー・ファンドを有するほか、個人投資家を主要出資者とするベンチャーキャピタルの中にも、エンジェルネットワークと類似の機能を果たすものも出てきている。こうしたエンジェルネットワークとベンチャーキャピタルとの連携は、エンジェル投資家側にベンチャーキャピタルのベンチャー投資に係る専門知識を与えてくれるだけでなく、ベンチャーキャピタル側にも、エンジェルネットワークに集まる様々な事業経験や専門性を有する者の知見をデュー・ディリジェンスや経営指導に生かすことができる可能性がある。 - 経済産業省 - However, we must strike a balance. It would be wrong to depend excessively on taxpayer money. In the case of a profitable project, if the private sector can undertake it on its own, it will generate decent profits and create new jobs, even without the involvement of DBJ. However, in Kyushu, projects of a public nature are carried out entirely at the national government’s expense. In such a case, the public nature is very strong. However, compared with in Tokyo, Osaka and Nagoya, it is very difficult, or even impossible, for the private sector to generate profits in Kyushu. Still, from the viewpoint of convenience for local communities and residents, policy-based finance is necessary. I believe that if a fixed low interest rate is available, a project can be carried out without losses even though profitability may be lower than in Tokyo and Osaka. I know of many such cases and what I have said is based on this knowledge.
しかし、そうはいっても、そこでやはりバランスというものがあります。だから、過度に税金でやるというのもいけませんし、利益が上がることは、（日本）政策（銀行）が関与しなくても、民間だけでしっかりやって頂ければ立派に利益が上がって、雇用も増えると私はそう思っています。だけれども、やはり九州では、公共性のあるものであれば、全額国費です。そうすると、非常に公共性が高いのです。しかし、民間で行なうと、東京、大阪、名古屋では採算がとれるけれども、九州では非常にとりにくい、あるいはとれない。しかし、やはり地域の利便、その地域の国民を考えれば、やはり政策（金融）というものが必要であり、金利も長期固定の金利であれば、それを基にして、やはり東京、大阪ほど利益は上がらないけれども、何とか赤字にならなくてやっていけるということを、たくさんのプロジェクトで私は見てきましたから、そういう意味で私は申し上げているのです。 - 金融庁 - - The descriptions in this checklist are based on the assumption that the roles of and responsibilities for developing a system for each business operation concerning Customer Protection and ensuring the effectiveness thereof rests with the Manager in charge of the relevant business. Given that the role that must be performed by each Manager is extensive, a dedicated division or department in charge of Customer Protection Management may be established or persons in charge of Customer Protection Management may be assigned to divisions and departments that require Customer Protection Management, including the Marketing and Sales Division, in the case where the Board of Directors determines that the Manager alone would not be sufficient to secure effective Customer Protection. In such a case, it is necessary to confirm whether the Customer Protection system is functioning effectively based on the empirical review and analysis as to whether an adequate number of persons with the knowledge and experience necessary for implementing the business are allocated and whether they are assigned the authority necessary for implementing the business.
・ 本チェックリストにおいては、各顧客保護等の態勢の整備及びその実効的機能の確保の役割・責任は、それぞれ各顧客保護等の管理責任者にあることを前提として記述する。各管理責任者が行うべき役割は広範囲にわたるため、管理責任者のみでは十分な確保を図ることができないと取締役会が判断する場合に、顧客保護等管理のための部門や部署を設置して管理させる方法や、営業推進部門等を含む顧客保護の必要性がある部門や部署等に担当者を配置し、管理責任者と連携する等の方法により管理を行う場合も想定される。この場合、その業務の遂行に必要な知識と経験を有する人員を適切な規模で配置し、業務の遂行に必要な権限を与えているか等を実証的に検証し分析した上で、顧客保護等の態勢が実効的に機能しているかを確認する - 金融庁 - Article 3 (1) A food business operator (meaning a person or juridical person who is engaged in collecting, producing, importing, processing, cooking, storing, transporting, or selling food or additives, or producing, importing, or selling apparatus or containers and packaging, or a person or juridical person who provides food to many and unspecified persons on an ongoing basis at schools, hospitals or other facilities; the same shall apply hereinafter) shall, on his/her own responsibility, endeavor to ensure the safety of the food, additives, apparatus or containers and packaging which he/she collects, produces, imports, processes, cooks, stores, transports, sells, provides to many and unspecified persons, or uses in business (hereinafter referred to as "food for sale, etc."), and for that purpose, he/she shall endeavor to obtain the knowledge and technologies necessary to ensure the safety of food for sale, etc., conduct voluntary inspections of food for sale, etc., and take other necessary measures.
第三条 食品等事業者（食品若しくは添加物を採取し、製造し、輸入し、加工し、調理し、貯蔵し、運搬し、若しくは販売すること若しくは器具若しくは容器包装を製造し、輸入し、若しくは販売することを営む人若しくは法人又は学校、病院その他の施設において継続的に不特定若しくは多数の者に食品を供与する人若しくは法人をいう。以下同じ。）は、その採取し、製造し、輸入し、加工し、調理し、貯蔵し、運搬し、販売し、不特定若しくは多数の者に授与し、又は営業上使用する食品、添加物、器具又は容器包装（以下「販売食品等」という。）について、自らの責任においてそれらの安全性を確保するため、販売食品等の安全性の確保に係る知識及び技術の習得、販売食品等の原材料の安全性の確保、販売食品等の自主検査の実施その他の必要な措置を講ずるよう努めなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (v) Where the planned quantity of manufacture or planned quantity of import (in the case of a person who intends to manufacture and import said new chemical substance, the sum of these quantities; the same shall apply in paragraph (1) and item (i) of paragraph (4) of Article 4-2) of said new chemical substance in one fiscal year is not more than the quantity specified by a Cabinet Order, and where a person has received a confirmation from the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment, in accordance with an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, to the effect that, as determined by already available knowledge, etc., said new chemical substance is not one that poses a risk of causing damage to human health or damage to the inhabitation and/or growth of flora and fauna in the human living environment by causing environmental pollution, and that person shall manufacture or import said new chemical substance in a quantity of no more than that to which said confirmation pertains during the relevant fiscal year
五 一の年度におけるその新規化学物質の製造予定数量又は輸入予定数量（その新規化学物質を製造し、及び輸入しようとする者にあつては、これらを合計した数量。第四条の二第一項及び第四項第一号において同じ。）が政令で定める数量以下の場合であつて、既に得られている知見等から判断して、その新規化学物質による環境の汚染が生じて人の健康に係る被害又は生活環境動植物の生息若しくは生育に係る被害を生ずるおそれがあるものでない旨の厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣の確認を厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより受け、かつ、その確認に係る数量以下のその新規化学物質を当該年度において製造し、又は輸入するとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Sec.2 Declaration of State Policy The State recognizes that an effective intellectual and industrial property system is vital to the development of domestic and creative activity, facilitates transfer of technology, attracts foreign investments, and ensures market access for our products. It shall protect and secure the exclusive rights of scientists, inventors, artists and other gifted citizens to their intellectual property and creations, particularly when beneficial to the people, for such periods as provided in this Act. The use of intellectual property bears a social function. To this end, the State shall promote the diffusion of knowledge and information for the promotion of national development and progress and the common good. It is also the policy of the State to streamline administrative procedures of registering patents, trademarks and copyright, to liberalize the registration on the transfer of technology, and to enhance the enforcement of intellectual property rights in the Philippines.
第2条 国家の政策の宣言 国家は，効果的な知的上かつ産業上の財産制度がフィリピンにおける創造的な活動の発展のために重要であり，技術移転を促進し，外国からの投資を誘引し，また，フィリピンの製品に対する市場のアクセスを保証するものであることを認識する。本制度は，科学者，発明者，芸術家その他の才能に恵まれた公民の排他的権利を，それらの者の知的所有権及び創作物に対して，人民に対して有益であるときには特に，本法で定める期間について保護し，及び確保する。 知的所有権の利用は，社会の機能を支える。この目的のため，国家は，国の発展及び進展並びに公共の利益の促進のために知識及び情報の普及を促進する。 特許，商標及び著作権の登録のための行政手続を合理化し，技術移転に関する登録を緩やかにし，そしてフィリピンにおける知的所有権の行使を高めることも，国家の政策である。 - 特許庁 - Article 76-2 (1) A prefectural governor, when a Designated In-Home Service Provider fails to meet the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the Article 74, paragraph (1) or the fixed minimum number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph with regard to knowledge, skill, or number of employees of the Business Office pertaining to said appointment as service provider, or when it is determined that said Designated In-Home Service Provider does not operate an appropriate Designated In-Home Service in accordance with the standards concerning Facilities and Management of a Designated In-Home Service Business provided by paragraph (2) of the same Article, may specify a due date and recommend to said Designated In-Home Service Provider to act in compliance with the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in paragraph (1) of the same Article, to employ the number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph, and to act in compliance with the standards concerning Facilities and Management of a Designated In-Home Service Business as prescribed by paragraph (2) of the same Article.
第七十六条の二 都道府県知事は、指定居宅サービス事業者が、当該指定に係る事業所の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第七十四条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数を満たしておらず、又は同条第二項に規定する指定居宅サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準に従って適正な指定居宅サービスの事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定居宅サービス事業者に対し、期限を定めて、同条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数の従業者を有し、又は同条第二項に規定する指定居宅サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - In particular, the fact that economic and financial fields have become highly globalized is common knowledge to all of you, so globalized that even 100 million dollars can be moved in a flash by means of computers. In times like this, it is, put simply and as far as I see it, a challenge to humanity in the 21st century to deal with the question of how to democratically control the advancement of financial engineering, or the economic globalization and financial globalization, and we are indeed in the process of tackling it, but imposing excessively harsh regulations on markets might cause them to shrink. Government control may pose another issue in that process, but the lack of it, which means applying a laissez-faire or no-restriction approach, might impose one negative effect after another on manufacturing and other industries, as was the case in the economic recession two years ago. In that sense, unlike the 1929 Great Depression, what I think the recent crisis is making us face is a challenge to human wisdom.
特に、経済・金融の分野は非常にグローバル化したということは皆さん方よくご存じでございまして、たちまち1億ドルの金でもコンピュータの中を動くわけでございますから、そういった時代に、簡単に言えばそういった金融工学の発展、あるいは経済のグローバル化、金融のグローバル化と基本的に民主主義社会でございまして、ある意味で私はこれを民主的なコントロールをいかにしていくかということは、21世紀の大変人類的課題だと思っていますが、今はその最中でございまして、ご存じのようにマーケットですからあんまり規制とか強化をしますとこれは縮んでしまいますし、また国の管理が出てきますし、それかといってご存じのように2年前の今、自由放任といいますか、自由にやってきますと、皆さんもご存じのようにこの前の経済不況のように製造業にもほかにもどんどん悪い影響が来たわけでございますから、そういった意味で非常に私は1929年の大恐慌とは違って、今回の恐慌はやっぱり人類の英知が試されているというふうに思っています。 - 金融庁 - Article 14 (1) Where the applicant has, after the publication of his/her application, given warning by presenting a written statement setting forth the particularities of the applied variety, he/she may claim, against a person who has exploited in the course of business, after the warning and prior to the variety registration, that applied variety, a variety which is, by its expressions of the characteristics, not clearly distinguishable from that applied variety, or a variety to which the provisions of each item of Article 20 paragraph (2) would apply if the said applied variety were registered, compensation in an amount equivalent to the amount which the applicant would be entitled to receive if that applied variety were registered. Even in the absence of such warning, the same shall apply to a person who has exploited in the course of business an applied variety (including a variety which, by its expressions of the characteristics, is not clearly distinguishable from the applied variety and a variety to which the provision of each item of Article 20 paragraph (2) would apply if the applied variety were registered; the same shall apply hereinafter in this Article) with knowledge that the variety which he/she exploited was an applied variety pertaining to the publication of application, prior to the variety registration.
第十四条 出願者は、出願公表があった後に出願品種の内容を記載した書面を提示して警告をしたときは、その警告後品種登録前にその出願品種、当該出願品種と特性により明確に区別されない品種又は当該出願品種が品種登録された場合に第二十条第二項各号に該当することとなる品種を業として利用した者に対し、その出願品種が品種登録を受けた場合にその利用に対し受けるべき金銭の額に相当する額の補償金の支払を請求することができる。当該警告をしない場合においても、出願公表に係る出願品種（当該出願品種と特性により明確に区別されない品種及び当該出願品種が品種登録された場合に同項各号に該当することとなる品種を含む。以下この条において同じ。）であることを知って品種登録前にその出願品種を業として利用した者に対しては、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - For another thing, derivatives products, which are new products based on financial engineering, have been sold around the world and the implosion of derivatives deals has had a significant impact on the real economy. Recently, such a situation occurred in the United States. By all means, the government must avoid a situation in which greed leads even innocent ordinary investors, who lack adequate knowledge, to suffer financial damage. The FSA (Financial Services Agency) has already been acting from that perspective. As you know, there are various ways of trading between many counterparties in the market. The FSA is considering if it is possible to set a central body that clears off all gains and losses made in the market through these trading. If a good proposal comes up in this respect, we may enact it into law. This is another matter we are now working on.
それともう一つは、ご承知のように、デリバティブ商品と言ったら、そういう金融工学に基づいてのいろいろな新しい商品が、世界中で売りまくられているわけでありまして、ご案内のように、それが破綻をすることによって、実体経済まで大変な影響を受けると。最近でも、そういう事態がアメリカに端を発して起きたわけでありますけれども、そうした金融商品の取引をめぐって、これを「善良な」と言いますか、一般の投資家までもが、知識を持たないで、欲に駆られてみたいな形でどんどん被害を被っていくということは、やはり我々政府としてはどうしても避けなければならないと。金融庁もそういう立場で今までもやっているわけでありますけれども、そういうことに関して、一つは、このお互いの、いろいろな取引の中で、皆さん方ご承知のように、錯綜した取引が行われるわけでありますけれども、損失が起きた場合の清算等について、できることなら一括して処理ができるようなあり方というのを作れないかどうかというようなことを、金融庁事務局において、今、検討してくれておりますので、この辺りで良い案が出てくれば、これを法制化するという場合も起きてこようかと思っております。これにも、今、取り組んでいる最中であります。 - 金融庁 - This concerns the issue of whether you can expect ordinary investors to have accurate knowledge regarding such products. It also concerns how sales activity is conducted, so we are considering all these issues. This is a complicated field. Some derivatives are like creating something from nothing. To put it simply, it is like, if I may say so, gambling. This has nothing to do with trading actual goods. In a betting game that used to be popular, we placed a bet as to whether the serial number of the next train would be an odd or even number. This is somewhat like that game, and transactions could be made without any relation to the real economy. If the parties involved in such transactions alone are to be affected, it may not be so problematic. However, as the scale of transactions has grown, the entire economy could be affected if the deals implode. So, we cannot just say, “We don't care if you suffer losses, as you have done the OTC(over-the-counter) deal with each side understanding the risk.” Therefore, we are considering all these issues.
だから、いろいろ、これは一般投資家が、その商品にとって正確な知識を持ち得るかどうかというようなことも一つあるでしょうね。そういうことを含めての営業のやり方もあるだろうし、だから、全般について、今、検討しているところなので。だから、この世界は難しいのですよ。「虚」が「虚」を生んでいるような世界があるでしょう。簡単に言うと、言葉は悪いですけど、博打場みたいなところがありますね。実態的な取引と関係ない形で、こんなことを言ったらおかしいけれども、昔、電車が来たら、次に来るのが奇数番号か偶数かということで賭けていたでしょう。それと似たような、実態とは縁のない形での取引がされる危険性があるし、いろいろな、そういう物事を捕まえてはやる。これは、お互いだけだったら何ということはないかもしれない。それでも、やはり取引がでかくなってしまった場合、それが破裂してしまった場合は、経済全体に影響が起きる場合があるので、「相対取引で、お互い納得づくで勝手に商品を取引していたので、損しようが関係ない」といってしまえない面もあるわけでしょう。だから、そういうことを含めて、今、検討しているという最中です。 - 金融庁 - As for Hong Kong, I have had a long relationship with Hong Kong since I visited there two decades ago as Parliamentary Vice-Minister for International Trade and Industry. As you may be aware, Asia’s financial center is either Tokyo, Hong Kong or Singapore. Following my trip to the United States the other day, I will visit Hong Kong, one of the financial hubs in Asia, where I hope to exchange various opinions with the people there and gain a wide range of knowledge.
それからまた、今日から大変恐縮でございますけれども、中国・香港に出張させていただきまして、（本日の）閣議で了解をいただいたわけでございまして、今回の出張は北京ですね、第3回日中ハイレベル経済対話の経済閣僚の1人として出席をさせていただきまして、それから中国・香港、私は20年ぐらいに実は香港とは非常に色々友好関係をしておりまして、20年前に通産省の政務次官のときに香港に行かせていただきまして、それ以来ずっと超党派の日本香港友好議員連盟の会長の羽田孜さんが、総理大臣をされた方がずっとしておりますが、私が長い間、事務局長をいたしておりまして、今は海江田万里さんがまた（衆院選を）通ってこられましたので海江田万里さんが事務局長で、今、会長は羽田孜元総理大臣、私が会長代理ということでございまして、香港とは長い間お付き合いもございますし、ご存じのように金融センター・香港ということでして、アメリカに行ってアジアの金融センター、東京か香港かシンガポールかということは皆さん方よくご存じだと思いますけれども、香港に行って、これは当然金融のアジアの中心の1つでもございますから、そういった方々と色々意見を交換、あるいは色々勉強させていただきたいという思いでございます。 - 金融庁 - Article 115-7 (1) A prefectural governor, when it is determined that a Designated Provider of Preventive Long-Term Care Service does not meet the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in Article 115-4, paragraph (1) or the fixed minimum number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph, with regard to knowledge, skill, or number of employees of the Business Office pertaining to said appointment as service provider, or does not operate an appropriate business of Designated Preventive Service of Long-Term Care in accordance with standards concerning effective support methods for Preventive Long-Term Care Service pertaining to Designated Preventive Service of Long-Term Care or standards concerning facilities and management of the business of Designated Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in paragraph (2) of the same Article, may specify a due date and recommend to said Designated Provider of Preventive Long-Term Care Service to comply with the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in paragraph (1) of the same Article, to employ the fixed minimum number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph, to comply with standards concerning effective support methods for Preventive Long-Term Care Service pertaining to Designated Preventive Service of Long-Term Care or standards concerning facilities and management of the business of Designated Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, and to comply with standards concerning facilities and management of a Designated Preventive Long-Term Care Service as prescribed in paragraph (2) of the same Article.
第百十五条の七 都道府県知事は、指定介護予防サービス事業者が、当該指定に係る事業所の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第百十五条の四第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数を満たしておらず、又は同条第二項に規定する指定介護予防サービスに係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定介護予防サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準に従って適正な指定介護予防サービスの事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定介護予防サービス事業者に対し、期限を定めて、同条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数の従業者を有し、又は同条第二項に規定する指定介護予防サービスに係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定介護予防サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 115-25 (1) A mayor of a Municipality, when it is determined that a Designated Provider of Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care does not meet the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the Article 115-22, paragraph (1) or fixed minimum number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph with regard to knowledge, skill, or employee of the Business Office pertaining to said appointment as service provider, or does not operate an appropriate business of Designated Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care in accordance with standards concerning effective support methods for Prevention of Long-Term Care pertaining to Designated Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care and standards concerning management of the business of Designated Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care prescribed in paragraph (2) of the same Article, may specify a due date and recommend to said Designated Provider of Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care to comply with the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in paragraph (1) of the same Article, to employ the fixed minimum number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph, to comply with standards concerning effective support methods for Prevention of Long-Term Care pertaining to Designated Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care and standards concerning management of the business of Designated Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care as prescribed in paragraph (2) of the same Article.
第百十五条の二十五 市町村長は、指定介護予防支援事業者が、当該指定に係る事業所の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第百十五条の二十二第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数を満たしておらず、又は同条第二項に規定する指定介護予防支援に係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定介護予防支援の事業の運営に関する基準に従って適正な指定介護予防支援の事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定介護予防支援事業者に対し、期限を定めて、同条第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数の従業者を有し、又は同条第二項に規定する指定介護予防支援に係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定介護予防支援の事業の運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (a) the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate -- which means the proportion of the total sum of the payments made as a result of any Problematic Conduct [which means the Problematic Conduct prescribed in Article 112] in each business year starting within three years prior to the commencement of the relevant business year [excluding payments pertaining to transactions in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market (excluding Commodity Clearing Transactions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience (which means a person specified in Article 107; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System (which means an Electronic Data Processing System connecting a computer used by the Futures Commodity Merchant and a computer [including the input/output devices] used by the customer through a telecommunications line; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) without carrying out solicitation]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to the total sum of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), items (i) to (iii) of the Act and the amount of the consideration for the transactions prescribed in item (iv) of the same paragraph (excluding the transaction amounts and the amount of the consideration for transactions in cases of transactions based on a person's own account and in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System without carrying out solicitation -- or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of the transaction amounts, whichever amount is greater (in cases where the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading that has already been accrued [in cases where a specific amount of money is used under the provisions of Article 221, paragraph (2) of the Act, the amount after deducting said amount; the same shall apply in the following item] is less than ten million yen, the amount obtained by adding, to such larger amount, an amount obtained by multiplying -- an amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) -- by the Problematic Conduct Rate or an amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said calculated amount, whichever amount is greater);
イ 各事業年度における法第二条第八項第一号に規定する取引（自己の計算による取引及びホに掲げる取引を除く。）の取引金額に事故率（当該事業年度開始日前三年以内に開始した各事業年度における事故（第百十二条に規定する事故をいう。）による支払額（商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者（第百七条で定める者をいう。以下この条において同じ。）から商品市場における取引等（商品清算取引を除く。以下この条において同じ。）の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織（商品取引員の使用に係る電子計算機と、顧客の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。）とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。以下この条において同じ。）を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引に係る支払額を除く。）の合計額の、法第二条第八項第一号から第三号に規定する取引の取引金額と同項第四号に規定する取引の対価の額の合計額（自己の計算による取引並びに商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者から商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引金額及び取引の対価の額を除く。）に占める割合をいう。以下この条において同じ。）を乗じた金額と取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額（既に積み立てられた商品取引責任準備金の金額（法第二百二十一条第二項の規定により使用された金額がある場合には、当該金額を控除した金額。次号において同じ。）が千万円に満たない場合には、当該いずれか大きい金額に、千万円から当該商品取引責任準備金の金額、及びロからチまでに掲げる金額を控除した金額を事故率に二を乗じて得た率と百万分の二とのいずれか大きい率で除して計算した金額（当該計算した金額が当該事業年度の取引金額を超える場合には、当該事業年度の当該取引金額。以下この号において同じ。）に事故率を乗じた金額と当該除して計算した金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額を加算した金額） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 8-2-2 (1) A person who holds the title to manage a property under fire prevention measures as set forth in Article 8, paragraph (1) specified by Cabinet Order as one for which inspection is necessary from a fire prevention perspective shall, as provided for by Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, have a person who has expert knowledge on the prevention of fire within a property under fire prevention measures and has a qualification specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (hereinafter referred to as a "qualified inspector of property under fire prevention measures" in the following paragraph, paragraph (1) of the following Article and Article 36, paragraph (3)) inspect, periodically, whether or not the operations necessary for fire prevention management within the property under fire prevention measures, the installation and maintenance of equipment used for fire defense, supply of water for fire defense or facilities necessary for fire extinguishing activities and other matters necessary for the prevention of fire (referred to as the "matters subject to inspection" in the following paragraph, paragraph (1) of the following Article and Article 36, paragraph (3)) conform to the standards specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications regarding the matters provided for in this Act or any order under this Act (referred to as the "inspection standards" in the following paragraph, paragraph (1) of the following Article and Article 36, paragraph (3)), and report the inspection results to a fire chief or fire station chief; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the matters subject to the inspection and reporting under the provision of Article 17-3-3.
第八条の二の二 第八条第一項の防火対象物のうち火災の予防上必要があるものとして政令で定めるものの管理について権原を有する者は、総務省令で定めるところにより、定期に、防火対象物における火災の予防に関する専門的知識を有する者で総務省令で定める資格を有するもの（次項、次条第一項及び第三十六条第三項において「防火対象物点検資格者」という。）に、当該防火対象物における防火管理上必要な業務、消防の用に供する設備、消防用水又は消火活動上必要な施設の設置及び維持その他火災の予防上必要な事項（次項、次条第一項及び第三十六条第三項において「点検対象事項」という。）がこの法律又はこの法律に基づく命令に規定する事項に関し総務省令で定める基準（次項、次条第一項及び第三十六条第三項において「点検基準」という。）に適合しているかどうかを点検させ、その結果を消防長又は消防署長に報告しなければならない。ただし、第十七条の三の三の規定による点検及び報告の対象となる事項については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 24 (1) In the case where the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment have, with regard to any single Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance, found it necessary to make a determination as to whether or not said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under item (i) of paragraph (3) of Article 2 since said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance poses a risk of causing damage to human health through environmental pollution if said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under said item, in view of the results of the tests under paragraph (8) of Article 2 and other available knowledge concerning said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance as well as the state of its manufacture, import, use, etc., they may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, instruct a person operating the business of manufacturing or importing said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance (including a person who has operated such business formerly and who is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) to conduct a study of the hazardous properties specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (which means a study on the effects of said chemical substance on human health if ingested continuously; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and to report the results thereof.
第二十四条 厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、一の第二種監視化学物質につき、第二条第八項の試験成績その他当該第二種監視化学物質に関して得られている知見及びその製造、輸入、使用等の状況からみて、当該第二種監視化学物質が同条第三項第一号に該当するものであるとすれば、当該第二種監視化学物質による環境の汚染により人の健康に係る被害を生ずるおそれがあると見込まれるため、当該第二種監視化学物質について同号に該当するかどうかを判定する必要があると認めるに至つたときは、当該第二種監視化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者（これらの事業を営んでいた者であつて経済産業省令で定めるものを含む。）に対し、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める有害性の調査（当該化学物質が継続的に摂取される場合における人の健康に及ぼす影響についての調査をいう。第三項において同じ。）を行い、その結果を報告すべきことを指示することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) In the cases set forth in the preceding paragraph, with regard to the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading to be accrued within three business years from the business year in which the license set forth in Article 190 of the Act (excluding a renewed license) was obtained, the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate -- which means the proportion of the total sum of the payments made as a result of any Problematic Conduct [which means the Problematic Conduct prescribed in Article 112] in each business year starting within three years prior to the commencement of the relevant business year [excluding payments pertaining to transactions in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market (excluding Commodity Clearing Transactions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) from a Person with Specialized Knowledge and Experience (which means a person specified in Article 107; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System (which means an Electronic Data Processing System connecting a computer used by the Futures Commodity Merchant and a computer [including the input/output devices] used by the customer through a telecommunications line; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) without carrying out solicitation]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to the total sum of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), items (i) to (iii) of the Act and the amount of the consideration for the transactions prescribed in item (iv) of the same paragraph (excluding the transaction amounts and the amount of the consideration for transactions in cases of transactions based on a person's own account and in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System without carrying out solicitation -- or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of the transaction amounts, whichever amount is greater" in item (i) of the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year," the phrase "such larger amount" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "such equivalent amount," the phrase "double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "0.006 percent," the phrase "an amount obtained by multiplying -- an amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) -- by the Problematic Conduct Rate or an amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said calculated amount, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "an amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item)," the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amount of transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iii) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (g)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate, or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said transaction amount, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.003 percent of the transaction amount of transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iii) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (g)) in each business year," and the phrase "the amount obtained by multiplying the total sum of the consideration for transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iv) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (h)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate, or the amount equivalent to 0.001 percent of said total sum of the consideration, whichever amount is greater" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount equivalent to 0.03 percent of the total sum of the consideration for transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (iv) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (h)) in each business year."
２ 前項の場合において、法第百九十条の許可（更新に係る許可を除く。）を受けた事業年度から三事業年度以内に積み立てられるべき商品取引責任準備金の金額は、同項第一号中「に事故率（当該事業年度開始日前三年以内に開始した各事業年度における事故（第百十二条に規定する事故をいう。）による支払額（商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者（第百七条で定める者をいう。以下この条において同じ。）から商品市場における取引等（商品清算取引を除く。以下この条において同じ。）の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織（商品取引員の使用に係る電子計算機と、顧客の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。）とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。以下この条において同じ。）を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引に係る支払額を除く。）の合計額の、法第二条第八項第一号から第三号に規定する取引の取引金額と同項第四号に規定する取引の対価の額の合計額（自己の計算による取引並びに商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者から商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引金額及び取引の対価の額を除く。）に占める割合をいう。以下この条において同じ。）を乗じた金額と取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「当該いずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「当該相当する金額」と、「事故率に二を乗じて得た率と百万分の二とのいずれか大きい率」とあるのは「十万分の六」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該除して計算した金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは「の十万分の三に相当する金額」と、「に事故率を乗じた金額と当該対価の額の合計額の十万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額」とあるのは、「の万分の三に相当する金額」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - I take it that you are asking about the proposed amendment to the Insurance Business Act that has been passed to the current session for continued deliberation. I assume that you are questioning the appropriateness of a mutual aid business of a public interest corporation or the arrangement in which a mutual aid business of a given public interest corporation is to be supervised by the former competent authorities, with an implication that the FSA should be responsible for supervision. Well, the fact is that the respective authorities, having the experience of supervising public interest corporations for a long time, are well-versed with specifics of their operation. On the subject of this Act, I believe that I named several examples the other day, such as the Japan Medical Association, which has always been supervised by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare since the Meiji era, including the years of supervision by its predecessor, the Health and Medical Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. While circumstances vary from authority to authority, they know very extensively about internal affairs of those corporations and have exercised thorough supervision and, in that sense, have a set of knowledge of their operation and other information accumulated in the course of the work of supervision in the past, which accordingly makes them presumably capable of delivering more fine-tuned supervision than the FSA would be. Since the most important thing is policyholder protection, we believe that, from such a perspective, having the former authorities supervise them is an appropriate way to go. It is also in comprehensive consideration of overall circumstances, including the fact that this exemption of the Act is a provisional step, that we find it appropriate to have the former authorities continue to supervise those corporations.
継続審議となっている保険業法の改正案のことだと思いますけれども、公益法人の共済事業あるいは旧主務官庁が監督することになっていますが、それはいかがなものかと、金融庁として監督すべきではないかという質問かと思いますけれども、公益法人というのは、それぞれの官庁が長い間、公益法人の監督をしてきたわけでございますから、その業務に関しては、各監督官庁が事情をよく知っており、この法律については、幾つかこの前も申し上げたと思いますが、例えば、日本医師会は確か明治以来、厚生省、当時の内務省衛生局が、ずっと監督官庁でございまして、各省色々ありますけれども、内部のことを非常によく知っており、各主務官庁がきめ細かい監督を行っていますから、そういった意味で、その業務に関する知見やこれまでの監督について蓄積している情報がございますので、金融庁に比べてより細かな監督を行うことができると考えられまして、契約者保護ということが一番大事ではございますが、そういった観点から（旧主務官庁が監督することが）適当というふうに考えております。そして、この法律の特例は当分の間という措置でございますので、そういったことを総合的に勘案して、引き続き旧主務官庁が監督することが適切だと考えております。 - 金融庁 - From August 16 to 21, I went on a business trip to the United States. As already reported in brief at the informal gathering with Cabinet ministers today, I visited Washington D.C. and New York, where I met with Federal Reserve Board (FRB) Chairman Ben Bernanke, Treasury Under Secretary Lael Brainard and the President’s economic advisor Paul Volcker, just to name a few. Paul Volcker, who served as FRB Chairman during the 1970s, is the economic advisor to President Barack Obama who created the so-called “Volcker Rule” in the recent financial reform legislation. In the United States, financial deregulation and economic and financial globalization had been a massive trend over the past two or three decades, basically, since the Great Depression in 1929. It was against such a backdrop in the United States that the first radical financial reform legislation in 80 years was established very recently. I asked others during my stay in the United States as to whether it amounted to a change comparable to the Copernican Revolution, and some Americans responded that it was indeed that kind of change. The major global financial trend is changing in the United States, the leading country of finance. I gained firsthand knowledge of this, having met with leading figures of the United States as the Minister for Financial Services and listened to their various opinions.
それから、私でございますが、8月16日から21日まで米国に出張させていただきまして、今日の閣僚懇でもあらかたは報告をさせていただきましたが、ワシントンDC及びニューヨークを訪問して、バーナンキFRB（連邦準備制度理事会）議長、それからブレイナード財務次官、ボルカー大統領経済顧問、ご存じのようにこれは1970年代のFRBの議長でございますが、大変背の高い人でございますが、今度の金融規制改革法でいわゆるボルカールールというのをつくったオバマ大統領の経済顧問でございますが、こういった方ともお会いいたしました。米国ではもう皆さん方ご存じのように80年ぶり、まさに1929年に大恐慌がございましてね、それから色々あったわけでございますけれども、基本的にこの二、三十年、金融の規制緩和、あるいは経済のグローバル化、あるいは金融のグローバル化ということが非常に大きな潮流でございましたが、そういった中で80年ぶりの根本的な改革を、金融規制改革法が成立したばかりでございまして、私が向こうに行って、「コペルニクス的変化か」と言ったら、「いや、自見さん実はコペルニクス的変化だ」と、こう言ったアメリカの方もおられましたが、そういった大きな、皆さん方もボルカールールをはじめ世界の金融の潮流が非常に大きくアメリカを、まさに金融の本場であったアメリカで変わってきたわけでございまして、そういったところを金融（担当）大臣として実感としてアメリカの要人ともお会いしつつ、きちっと色々な意見を聞かせていただいたわけでございます。 - 金融庁 - Article 83-3 The provisions of paragraph (2) and (3) of Article 75-2, and of Article 75-3 through Article 75-12 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the work of the designated consultant examination institutions and consultant examination affairs provided for in the preceding article. In this case, "the Director of the Prefectural Labor Bureau" in paragraph (3) of Article 75-2 and Article 75-12 shall be read as "the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare"; "paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of Article 75-2 read as "Article 83-2"; "the examination affair rules provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 75-6" in paragraph (2) of Article 75-4 as "the procedure rules concerning the implementation of consultant examination affairs "; "giving a decision as to whether the applicant has knowledge and capability necessary for a license holder" in paragraph (1) of Article 75-5 as "formulating and marking examination questions for industrial safety consultant examinations and industrial health consultant examinations"; "license examiner" in the same article and Article 75-8 as "consultant examiner"; "the examination affair rules provided for in paragraph (1) of the following Article" in paragraph (4) of Article 75-5 as "the procedure rules concerning the implementation of the consultant examination affairs "; "examination affairs (hereinafter in this Article and Article 75-11, paragraph (2), item (iv) referred to as the ' examination affair rules')" in paragraph (1) of Article 75-6 as "procedure rules"; "the examination affair rules" in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the same Article and item (iv) of paragraph (2) of Article 75-11 as "the procedure rules relating to the implementation of consultant examination affairs".
第八十三条の三 第七十五条の二第二項及び第三項並びに第七十五条の三から第七十五条の十二までの規定は、前条の規定による指定、指定コンサルタント試験機関及びコンサルタント試験事務について準用する。この場合において、第七十五条の二第三項及び第七十五条の十二中「都道府県労働局長」とあるのは「厚生労働大臣」と、第七十五条の二第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「第八十三条の二」と、第七十五条の四第二項中「第七十五条の六第一項に規定する試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と、第七十五条の五第一項中「免許を受ける者として必要な知識及び能力を有するかどうかの判定」とあるのは「労働安全コンサルタント試験又は労働衛生コンサルタント試験の問題の作成及び採点」と、同条及び第七十五条の八中「免許試験員」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験員」と、第七十五条の五第四項中「次条第一項に規定する試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と、第七十五条の六第一項中「規程（以下この条及び第七十五条の十一第二項第四号において「試験事務規程」という。）」とあるのは「規程」と、同条第二項及び第三項並びに第七十五条の十一第二項第四号中「試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 25-3 (1) In the case that the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry and the Minister of the Environment have, with regard to any single Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance, found it necessary to make a determination as to whether or not said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under item (ii) of paragraph (3) of Article 2 since said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance poses a risk of causing damage to the inhabitation and/or growth of flora and fauna in the human living environment through environmental pollution if said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under said item, in view of the results of the tests prescribed in paragraph (7) of Article 4 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (9) of Article 4-2) and any other available knowledge concerning said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance as well as the state of its manufacture, import, use, etc., they may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, instruct a person operating the business of manufacturing or importing said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance (including a person who operated such business formerly and who is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) to conduct a study of the hazardous properties specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (which means a study on the effects of said chemical substance on the inhabitation and/or growth of flora and fauna in the human living environment if ingested continuously; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and to report the results thereof.
第二十五条の三 経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、一の第三種監視化学物質につき、第四条第七項（第四条の二第九項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する試験の試験成績その他当該第三種監視化学物質に関して得られている知見及びその製造、輸入、使用等の状況からみて、当該第三種監視化学物質が第二条第三項第二号に該当するものであるとすれば、当該第三種監視化学物質による環境の汚染により生活環境動植物の生息又は生育に係る被害を生ずるおそれがあると見込まれるため、当該第三種監視化学物質について同号に該当するかどうかを判定する必要があると認めるに至つたときは、当該第三種監視化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者（これらの事業を営んでいた者であつて経済産業省令で定めるものを含む。）に対し、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める有害性の調査（継続的に当該化学物質が摂取され、又はこれにさらされる場合における生活環境動植物の生息又は生育に及ぼす影響についての調査をいう。第三項において同じ。）を行い、その結果を報告すべきことを指示することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Our teacher dedicated his life to the study requiring great pains; as to "Koshi-den", at the end of the Bunka era (1804-1818), he began to write the draft, and by the early Bunsei era (1818-1830), about 12 volumes had been completed; however, by that time, he had also gradually gained an insight into the study and understood the teachings of the master of Suzunoya (Norinaga MOTOORI), then he realized that this world was the product of our great gods of Japan, so he decided to suspend "Koshi-den" temporarily, and first explore and read through all the past annotations of the histories of our country as well as those of India and Europe to use new knowledge to his advantage in writing "Koshi-den"; therefore, since the middle of the Bunsei era, he intensly studied foreign literature and culture mainly, and during a period of over 20 years, he completed almost all his works, which he left for us, including "Sekiken Taiko-den" (Japanese Early History); although he was never satisfied with his works, his students, of course, including myself, with a feeling of gratitude, thought that our master had succeeded in completing most his researches and studies, and were concerned about the delay in completing "Koshi-den" and because of our master's age, we repeatedly begged him to restart the writing, then thankfully at about the 10th year of the Tenpo era (1839), he restarted; however, he was requested to write on linguistic methods so he began to write "Goju Ongi" (Pronunciation and Meaning of 50 Kana) and suspended "Koshi-den" again; after a year, he was banished to Akita Province by order of the former bakufu (Japanese feudal government headed by a shogun), fortunately since Akita was his hometown and there were many relatives of his, besides the former load treated him very kindly, they relieved him off poor living, although under those conditions, he had no time to finish the remaining works; he was always concerned about those unfinished works, and after only a few years, he became sick and regrettably died.
生涯苦心致され候中にも、古史伝は最初文化の末頃より草稿取り掛かり、文政の始め頃に、成文一二巻程は、ざっと稿本成り候ところ、段々見識博くあいなり、殊に故鈴屋大人の御遺教をも相伺れ候て、いよいよ以って、世界悉く我が皇大神達の御鎔造（ツクリカタメ）なされたる事を感得致され候に付、古史伝は先ず差し置き、赤縣州を始め、印度及び西洋の古伝をも悉く皆探索網羅して、其の上にて、充分に古史の註解をと存し込まれ候て、文政の半ば頃より、専ら外国の学に困苦致され、凡そ廿余年も歳月を過ごされ候て、赤縣太古傳を初め、即ち今此れある丈の著述は出来候へ共、中々もって先人の心底に叶ひ候事には此れ無く候へ共、大抵は見当も付き候に依っては、私を始め門人の中の所存にも、段々時節後れ、先人も老年に成られ候に付き、先ず先ず外国の所は大抵にして差し置かれ、古史伝の清撰をしきりて、相願い催促致し候て、天保10年頃より、漸々と其の方にも趣かれ候所、言語規則の書之無きに付き、余儀なく五十音義の撰にかかり、凡そ一ヵ年ほど打ち過ぎられ候所、旧幕府の命に依って秋田へ放逐、尤も同所は本国の事、親族共も少なからず、第一旧君侯より厚く恩遇も之有りて会計の辛苦は薄らぎ候へ共、著述致す可き遑なく、此処両三年心配致され候内に病を発し入幽致され候次第にて残念至極にて御座候。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス - Article 78-8 (1) The mayor of a Municipality, when it is determined that a Designated Community-Based Service Provider does not act in compliance with the provision provided when providing said appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 78-2, paragraph (7), that does not meet the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the Article 78-4, paragraph (1) or fixed number as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph, or standards concerning employees that engage in Designated Community-Based Service provided by paragraph (4) of the same Article, with regard to knowledge, skill, or number of employee of the Business Office pertaining to said appointment as service provider, or when it is determined that said Designated Community-Based Service Provider does not operate an appropriate Designated Community-Based Service in accordance with the standards concerning Facilities and Management of a Designated Community-Based Service Business provided by paragraph (2) or paragraph (4) of the same Article, may specify a due date and recommend to said Designated Community-Based Service Provider to act in compliance with the provisions provided when determining said appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 78-2, paragraph (7), to comply with the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in Article 78-4, paragraph (1), to employ the number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph, to comply with standards concerning employees that engage in Designated Community-Based Service as prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, and to comply with standards concerning Facilities and Management of a Designated Community-Based Service Business as prescribed by paragraph (2) or paragraph (4) of the same Article.
第七十八条の八 市町村長は、指定地域密着型サービス事業者が、第七十八条の二第七項の規定により当該指定を行うに当たって付された条件に従わず、当該指定に係る事業所の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第七十八条の四第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数若しくは同条第四項に規定する指定地域密着型サービスに従事する従業者に関する基準を満たしておらず、又は同条第二項若しくは第四項に規定する指定地域密着型サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準に従って適正な指定地域密着型サービスの事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定地域密着型サービス事業者に対し、期限を定めて、第七十八条の二第七項の規定により当該指定を行うに当たって付された条件に従い、第七十八条の四第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数の従業者を有し、若しくは同条第四項に規定する指定地域密着型サービスに従事する従業者に関する基準を遵守し、又は同条第二項若しくは第四項に規定する指定地域密着型サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well.
それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7％は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。 - 金融庁 - Article 36 (1) The provisions of Article 8 to Article 8-2-3 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a building or another structure specified by Cabinet Order as one for which the respective measures set forth in these provisions are particularly necessary in order to mitigate any damage arising from disasters, other than fires, specified by Cabinet Order. In this case: in Article 8, paragraph (1) to paragraph (4), the term "fire prevention manager" shall be deemed to be replaced with "disaster prevention manager"; in Article 8, paragraph (1), the phrase "qualified persons specified by Cabinet Order" shall be deemed to be replaced with "qualified persons who have knowledge of the mitigation of the damage arising from fires and other disasters and who are specified by Cabinet Order," and the phrase "conduct drills for fire extinguishing activities, reporting and evacuation, inspect and improve the equipment used for fire defense, water supply for fire defense or facilities necessary for fire extinguishing activities, supervise the use or handling of fire, maintain and manage the structure and equipment necessary for evacuation or fire prevention, manage the capacity of the property at the appropriate level, and perform any other operations necessary for fire prevention management" shall be deemed to be replaced with "conduct drills for evacuation and perform any other operations necessary for disaster prevention management"; in Article 8, paragraph (4), Article 8-2, paragraph (1) and Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1), the phrase "for fire prevention management" shall be deemed to be replaced with "for disaster prevention management"; in Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1), the phrase "on the prevention of fire" shall be deemed to be replaced with "on the mitigation of the damage arising from disasters, other than fires, specified by Cabinet Order," and the phrase "the installation and maintenance of equipment used for fire defense, water supply for fire defense or facilities necessary for fire extinguishing activities and other matters necessary for prevention of fire" shall be deemed to be replaced with "and other matters necessary for the mitigation of the damage arising from disasters, other than fires, specified by Cabinet Order"; in Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) and Article 8-2-3, paragraph (1), item (ii)(d), the term "qualified inspector of property under fire prevention measures" shall be deemed to be replaced with "qualified inspector for disaster prevention management"; in Article 8-2-3, paragraph (1), item (ii)(a), and paragraph (6), item (ii) of said Article, the phrase "or Article 17-4, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2)" shall be deemed to be replaced with ", Article 17-4, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2), or Article 8, paragraph (3) or paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 36, paragraph (1)."
第三十六条 第八条から第八条の二の三までの規定は、火災以外の災害で政令で定めるものによる被害の軽減のため特に必要がある建築物その他の工作物として政令で定めるものについて準用する。この場合において、第八条第一項から第四項までの規定中「防火管理者」とあるのは「防災管理者」と、同条第一項中、「政令」とあるのは、「火災その他の災害の被害の軽減に関する知識を有する者で政令」と、「消火、通報及び避難の訓練の実施、消防の用に供する設備、消防用水又は消火活動上必要な施設の点検及び整備、火気の使用又は取扱いに関する監督、避難又は防火上必要な構造及び設備の維持管理並びに収容人員の管理その他防火管理上」とあるのは「避難の訓練の実施その他防災管理上」と、同条第四項、第八条の二第一項及び第八条の二の二第一項中「防火管理上」とあるのは「防災管理上」と、同項中「火災の予防に」とあるのは「火災以外の災害で政令で定めるものによる被害の軽減に」と、「、消防の用に供する設備、消防用水又は消火活動上必要な施設の設置及び維持その他火災の予防上」とあるのは「その他火災以外の災害で政令で定めるものによる被害の軽減のために」と、同項、同条第二項及び第八条の二の三第一項第二号ニ中「防火対象物点検資格者」とあるのは「防災管理点検資格者」と、同号イ及び同条第六項第二号中「又は第十七条の四第一項若しくは第二項」とあるのは、「、第十七条の四第一項若しくは第二項又は第三十六条第一項において準用する第八条三項若しくは第四項」と読み替えるもとのする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - Article 115-16 (1) A mayor of a Municipality, when it is determined that a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care does not act in compliance with the provision provided when providing said appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 115-11, paragraph (5), does not meet the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in Article 115-13, paragraph (1) or the fixed minimum number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph or standards concerning employees that engage in Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care provided by paragraph (4) of the same Article, with regard to knowledge, skill, or number of employees of the Business Office pertaining to said appointment as service provider, or when it is determined that said Community-Based Preventive Long-Term Care Service does not operate an appropriate Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care in accordance with standards concerning effective support methods for Prevention of Long-Term Care pertaining to a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care and standards concerning facilities and management of the business of Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in paragraph (2) or paragraph (4) of the same Article, may specify a due date and recommend to said Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care to act in compliance with the provisions provided when determining said appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 115-11, paragraph (5), to comply with the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in Article 115-13, paragraph (1), to employ the number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph, to comply with standards concerning employees that engage in Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, and to comply with standards concerning effective support methods for Prevention of Long-Term Care pertaining to a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care and standards concerning facilities and management of the business of Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed by paragraph (2) and paragraph (4) of the same Article.
第百十五条の十六 市町村長は、指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者が、第百十五条の十一第五項の規定により当該指定を行うに当たって付された条件に従わず、当該指定に係る事業所の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第百十五条の十三第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数若しくは同条第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに従事する従業者に関する基準を満たしておらず、又は同条第二項若しくは第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準に従って適正な指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者に対し、期限を定めて、第百十五条の十一第五項の規定により当該指定を行うに当たって付された条件に従い、第百十五条の十三第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数の従業者を有し、若しくは同条第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに従事する従業者に関する基準を遵守し、又は同条第二項若しくは第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - The documents specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 168, paragraph 2 of the Act shall be as follows (in the case of a certification issued by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a certificate of the registered matters of the company; (ii) the accounting documents, etc. for the most recent business year and related detailed certifications; (iii) a document stating the estimated income for the three years after the commencement of the business; (iv) a document stating the name or trade name of the major shareholder (which means a shareholder holding 10 percent or more of the voting rights [which means a voting right prescribed in Article 86, paragraph 1 of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item] of total shareholders; hereinafter the same shall apply), the address or location and the number of voting rights that the major shareholder holds;(v) a document giving a description of a parent juridical person, etc. (which means a juridical person or other organization that holds the majority of voting rights [which is a voting right as prescribed in the preceding item] of the total shareholders of a Commodity Clearing Organization) and subsidiary juridical person(s), etc. (which means a juridical person or other organization that holds the majority of the voting rights [which means the voting rights prescribed in Article 7, paragraph 1, item 3 of the Ordinance] of the total shareholders, etc. [which means the total shareholders, etc. prescribed in Article 7, paragraph 1, item 3 of the Ordinance] of a Commodity Clearing Organization); (vi) a sworn, written document stating that the Commodity Clearing Organization is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) through (e) or (i) of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act;(vii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in the case where an officer is a foreign national: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., and the curriculum vitae of said officer, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) through (k) of the Act;(b) in the case where an officer is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document stating the corporate development, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (l) of the Act;(c) in the case where an officer is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., and the curriculum vitae of said officer; a certification issued by a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) and (b); and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) through (k) of the same item; (viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the Business of Assuming Commodity Transaction Debts and the status of the assignment of such employees; (ix) in the case where an organizational general meeting is held, the minutes of the organizational general meeting; (x) a document stating the names or trade names of Clearing Participants, and the addresses of the principal offices or head offices; (xi) records prepared by Clearing Participants according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the filing of the application and pertaining to such persons’ net assets; (xii) in the case where an electronic data processing system is used for the Business of Assuming Commodity Transaction Debts, a document giving a description, installation location, capacity, and maintenance system of said electronic data processing system, and the process for responding in the event of the failure of said electronic data processing system; (xiii) other documents stating the matters to be referenced for approval as to whether the organization conforms to the standards set forth in Article 169, paragraph 1 of the Act.
法第百六十八条第二項の主務省令で定める書類は、次に掲げるもの（官公署が証明す る書類の場合には、許可の申請の日前三月以内に作成されたものに限る。）とする。一登記事項証明書 二直前事業年度の計算書類等及びその附属証明書 三業務開始後三年間における収支の見込みを記載した書面 四主要株主（総株主の議決権（法第八十六条第一項に規定する議決権をいう。以下 この号において同じ。）の百分の十以上の議決権を保有している株主をいう。以下同 じ。）の氏名又は商号若しくは名称、住所又は所在地及びその保有する議決権の数を 記載した書面 五 親法人等（商品取引清算機関の総株主の議決権（前号に規定する議決権をいう。） の過半数を保有している法人その他の団体をいう。）及び子法人等（商品取引清算機 - 139 - 関が総株主等（令第七条第一項第三号 に規定する総株主等をいう。）の議決権（令 第七条第一項第三号 に規定する議決権をいう。）の過半数を保有している法人その 他の団体をいう。）の概要を記載した書面 六法第十五条第二項第一号ハからホまで又はリのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約 する書面 七次に掲げる場合に応じ、それぞれ次に定める書面 イ役員が外国人である場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書及びその者が法第 十五条第二項第一号イからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 ロ役員が法人である場合当該役員の登記事項証明書、沿革を記載した書面及び法 第十五条第二項第一号ヲに該当しないことを誓約する書面 ハ役員が外国人又は法人でない場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書、その者 が法第十五条第二項第一号イ及びロに該当しない旨の官公署の証明書並びにその 者が同号ハからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 九創立総会を開催した場合には、創立総会の議事録 十清算参加者の氏名又は商号若しくは名称及び主たる事務所又は本店の所在地を記載 した書面 十一清算参加者が許可の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号により作成したその者の 純資産額に関する調書 十二商品取引債務引受業において電子情報処理組織を使用する場合には、当該電子情 報処理組織の概要、設置場所、容量及び保守の方法並びに当該電子情報処理組織に 異常が発生した場合の対処方法を記載した書類 十三その他法第百六十九条第一項に掲げる基準に適合しているかどうかについての 認定の参考となるべき事項を記載した書面 - 経済産業省 - The documents specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 132, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as follows (in the case of certifications issued by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a document containing the reasons for and contents of entity conversion; (ii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in the case where an officer of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a foreign national: a Copy of the Residence Certificate, etc. of said officer, the curriculum vitae, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 (a) to (k) of the Act; (b) in the case where an officer of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document containing the history thereof, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 (l) of the Act; (c) in the case where an officer of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after - 80 - Entity Conversion is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a Copy of the Residence Certificate, etc. of said officer, the curriculum vitae, a certificate of a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 (a) or (b) of the Act, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) to (k) of the same item; (iii) minutes of a general meeting of the members which approved the entity conversion plan; (iv) Settlement Related Documents, etc. for the most recent business year; (v) a document proving the amount of the existing net assets; (vi) when issuing Shares of Stock Issued upon Entity Conversion pursuant to the provisions of Article 129, paragraph 1 of the Act, the following documents: (a) a document proving an application to subscribe for the Shares of Stock Issued upon Entity Conversion; (b) when making money the object of the contribution, a document stating that payment was made pursuant to the provisions of Article 131-3, paragraph 1 of the Act; (c) when making property other than money the object of the contribution, the following documents: 1. when an inspector has been appointed: a document containing the investigation report by said inspector and its annexed documents; 2. in the case set forth in Article 207, paragraph 9, item 3 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 131-6 of the Act: a document proving the market price of the Securities; 3. in the case set forth in Article 207, paragraph 9, item 4 of the Company Act - 81 - as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 131-6 of the Act: a document containing the certification prescribed in the same item and its annexed documents; 4. in the case set forth in Article 207, paragraph 9, item 5 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 131-6 of the Act: the account book stating the monetary claim set forth in the same item; (d) when there has been a court judgment on a report by an inspector: a transcript of said judgment; (vii) a document that states that a public notice or a notification under Article 124, paragraph 2 of the Act has been given; and when a creditor has made an objection, documents that state that the liabilities have been repaid or a reasonable collateral has been provided to said creditor or reasonable property has been deposited in trust for the purpose of repaying the liabilities to said creditor, or that said entity conversion is not likely to harm said creditor;(viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the business of a Commodity Exchange and the status of the assignment of such employees; (ix) a document that contains major shareholders’ names, addresses or residences, nationalities and occupations (in the case where a shareholder is a juridical person or other organization, its trade name or name, the location of its head office or principal office, and the contents of its business), and the number of voting rights they hold.
法第百三十二条第三項の主務省令で定める書面は、次に掲げる書面（官公署が証明する 書面の場合には、認可の申請の日前三月以内に作成されたものに限る。）とする。一組織変更の理由及び内容を記載した書面 二次に掲げる場合に応じ、それぞれ次に定める書面 イ組織変更後株式会社商品取引所の役員が外国人である場合当該役員の住民票の 写し等、履歴書及びその者が法第十五条第二項第一号イからルまでのいずれにも 該当しないことを誓約する書面 ロ組織変更後株式会社商品取引所の役員が法人である場合当該役員の登記事項証 明書、沿革を記載した書面及び法第十五条第二項第一号ヲに該当しないことを誓 約する書面 ハ組織変更後株式会社商品取引所の役員が外国人又は法人でない場合当該役員の 住民票の写し等、履歴書、その者が法第十五条第二項第一号イ及びロに該当しな い旨の官公署の証明書並びにその者が同号ハからルまでのいずれにも該当しない ことを誓約する書面 三組織変更計画を承認した会員総会の議事録 四直前事業年度の決算関係書類等 五現に存する純資産額を証する書面 六法第百二十九条第一項の規定により組織変更時発行株式を発行するときは、次に掲 げる書面 イ組織変更時発行株式の引受けの申込みを証する書面 ロ金銭を出資の目的とするときは、法第百三十一条の三第一項の規定による払込み があったことを証する書面 ハ金銭以外の財産を出資の目的とするときは、次に掲げる書面 （１） 検査役が選任されたときは、検査役の調査報告を記載した書面及びその附 属書類 （２） 法第百三十一条の六において準用する会社法第二百七条第九項第三号に掲 げる場合には、有価証券の市場価格を証する書面 （３） 法第百三十一条の六において準用する会社法第二百七条第九項第四号に掲 げる場合には、同号に規定する証明を記載した書面及びその附属書類 （４） 法第百三十一条の六において準用する会社法第二百七条第九項第五号に掲 げる場合には、同号の金銭債権について記載された会計帳簿 ニ検査役の報告に関する裁判があったときは、その謄本 七法第百二十四条第二項の規定による公告及び催告をしたこと並びに異議を述べた債 権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しくは当 該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は当該組 織変更をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 八商品取引所の業務に関する知識及び経験を有する従業員の確保の状況並びに当該従 業員の配置の状況を記載した書類 九主要な株主の氏名、住所又は居所、国籍及び職業（株主が法人その他の団体である 場合には、その商号又は名称、本店又は主たる事務所の所在の場所及び営んでいる事 業の内容）並びに保有する議決権の数を記載した書面 - 経済産業省 - The documents specified by an ordinance set forth in Article 145, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as listed in the following (in case of documents certified by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a document recording the reasons for the merger; (ii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a foreign national: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., the curriculum vitae of said officer, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) through (k) of the Act; (b) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document stating the corporate development, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (l) of the Act; (c) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., and the curriculum vitae of said officer; a certification issued by a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) and (b) of the Act; and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) through (k) of the same item; (iii) a document stating the name or trade name of a Member, etc., and the address of the principal office or head office of the Member, etc.; a sworn, written statement that the Member, etc. is subject to any of the provisions of Article 30, paragraph 1 of the Act for each Commodity Market where transactions are conducted, or a sworn, written statement that trading participants are subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of Article 82, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Act, or any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of item 2 of the same paragraph by each Commodity Market where they conduct - 111 - transactions; a sworn, written statement that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (l) of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act; and in the case where the Commodity Exchange specified in the application carries out settlement by the method set forth in Article 105, paragraph 1 of the Act on one or more Commodity Markets that the Commodity Exchange intends to open, a record pertaining to such person's net assets prepared according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the date of application for approval; (iv) minutes of the general meeting of shareholders approving the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of Members prescribed in Article 144, paragraph 4, Article 144-2, paragraph 2, or Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of shareholders prescribed in Article 144-6, paragraph 1 and Article 144-13, paragraph 1 of the Act, and Article 783, paragraph 1, Article 795, paragraph 1, or Article 804, paragraph 1 of the Company Act) of each Commodity Exchange which carries out the merger, or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for the merger have been followed; (v) a document stating the status of the property, income and expenditure of each Commodity Exchange that carries out the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, the settlement related statements, etc. of the preceding business year; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the financial documents, etc. of the preceding business year and detailed statements thereof); (vi) in the case where a public notice or demand (in cases where the public notice is made through an official gazette, a daily newspaper which publishes matters of current events, or an Electronic Public Notice pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 3 or Article 144-10, paragraph 3 of the Act [including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17), or Article 789, paragraph 3; Article 799, paragraph 3; or Article 810, paragraph 3 of the Company Act, a public notice by such method) is made pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 2 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5; Article 144-2, paragraph 3; and Article 144-3, paragraph 5 of the Act, or Article 144-10, paragraph 2 of the Act (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17 of the Act); Article 789, paragraph 2; Article 799, paragraph 2; or Article 810, paragraph 2 of the Company Act; and in cases where a creditor has made an objection, a document certifying that the liabilities have been paid or reasonable collateral has been provided to said creditor, reasonable property has been deposited for the purpose of repaying the liabilities to said creditor, or that said merger is not likely to harm said creditor; (vii) a document stating a method for business succession pertaining to transactions on a Commodity Market which has been opened by a Commodity Exchange dissolved as a result of a merger; (viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the business of a Commodity Exchange and the status of the assignment of such employees (limited to a case where a Commodity Exchange subsequent to a merger becomes an Incorporated Commodity Exchange); (ix) a document stating the estimated transaction volume of Futures Transactions for one year after the merger on the Commodity Market which he/she seeks to open; (x) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed - 113 - Commodity at the time of a merger, a document stating that it is appropriate to conduct transactions of Listed Commodity Component Products, etc. on a single Commodity Market; (xi) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market at the time of a merger by specifying two or more Commodity Indices as a single Listed Commodity Index, a document stating that the majority of the goods subject to said two or more Commodity Indices shall be common to one another.
法第百四十五条第三項の主務省令で定める書面は、次に掲げる書面（官公署が証明す る書面の場合には、認可の申請の日前三月以内に作成されたものに限る。）とする。 一合併の理由を記載した書面 二次に掲げる場合に応じ、それぞれ次に定める書面 イ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が外国 人である場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書及びその者が法第十五条第二 項第一号イからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 ロ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が法人 である場合当該役員の登記事項証明書、沿革を記載した書面及び法第十五条第 二項第一号ヲに該当しないことを誓約する書面 ハ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が外国 人又は法人でない場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書、その者が法第十五 条第二項第一号イ及びロに該当しない旨の官公署の証明書並びにその者が同号 ハからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 三会員等の氏名又は商号若しくは名称及び主たる事務所又は本店の所在地を記載した 書面、会員が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第三十条第一項各号のいずれかに該当す ることを誓約する書面又は取引参加者が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第八十二条第 一項第一号イからハまで若しくは同項第二号イからハまでのいずれかに該当する ことを誓約する書面、その者が法第十五条第二項第一号イからヲまでのいずれにも 該当しないことを誓約する書面並びに申請に係る商品取引所が開設しようとする一 以上の商品市場において法第百五条第一号に掲げる方法により決済を行う場合には 認可の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号により作成したその者の純資産額に関す る調書 四合併を行う各商品取引所の合併総会（会員商品取引所にあっては、法第百四十四条 第四項、第百四十四条の二第二項又は第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会をいい、 株式会社商品取引所にあっては、法第百四十四条の六第一項、第百四十四条の十三 第一項、会社法第七百八十三条第一項、第七百九十五条第一項又は第八百四条第一 項の株主総会をいう。）の議事録その他必要な手続があったことを証する書面 五合併を行う各商品取引所の財産及び収支の状況を知ることができる書面（会員商品 取引所にあっては最終事業年度の決算関係書類等、株式会社商品取引所にあっては 最終事業年度の計算書類等及びその附属明細書）六法第百四十四条第五項、第百四十四条の二第三項及び第百四十四条の三第五項に おいて準用する法第百二十四条第二項、第百四十四条の十第二項（第百四十四条の 十七において準用する場合を含む。）、会社法第七百八十九条第二項 、第七百九十九 条第二項又は第八百十条第二項の規定による公告及び催告（第百二十四条第三項、 第百四十四条の十第三項（第百四十四条の十七において準用する場合を含む。）、会 社法第七百八十九条第三項、第七百九十九条第三項又は第八百十条第三項の規定に より公告を官報のほか時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙又は電子公告によっ てした場合にあっては、これらの方法による公告）をしたこと並びに異議を述べた 債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しく は当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は - 112 - 当該合併をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 七合併により消滅する商品取引所の開設している商品市場における取引に関する業務 の承継の方法を記載した書面 八商品取引所の業務に関する知識及び経験を有する従業員の確保の状況並びに当該従 業員の配置の状況を記載した書面（合併後の商品取引所が株式会社商品取引所であ る場合に限る。九開設しようとする商品市場における合併後一年間の先物取引の取引量の見込みを記 載した書面 十合併に際して上場商品に係る商品市場を開設しようとする場合にあっては、上場商 品構成物品を一の商品市場で取引をすることが適当である旨を明らかにすることが できる書面 十一合併に際して二以上の商品指数を一の上場商品指数として商品市場を開設しよう とする場合にあっては、当該二以上の商品指数の対象となる物品の大部分が共通し ていることを明らかにすることができる書面 - 経済産業省
- ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
- 特許庁
- Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
- Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
- 本サービスで使用している「Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス」はWikipediaの日本語文を独立行政法人情報通信研究機構が英訳したものを、Creative Comons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0による利用許諾のもと使用しております。詳細はhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ および http://alaginrc.nict.go.jp/WikiCorpus/ をご覧下さい。
- 金融庁
- Copyright(C) 2026 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
- 経済産業省
- Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
