「FIFTH」を含む例文一覧(6132)

＜前へ 1 2 .... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123
  • He joined the palace staff in 1076, became Jugoinojo (Junior Fifth Rank, Upper Grade) and Tango no kami (Governor of Tango Province) in 1078, Jushiinoge (Junior Fourth Rank, Lower Grade) in 1081, Bicchu no kami (Governer of Bicchu Province) and Uchujo (Middle Captain of the Right Division of Inner Palace Guards) before 1081, Shoshiinoge (Senior Fourth Rank) in 1084, took the title Chugu Gon no suke (Provisional Assistant Master of the Consort's Household) and Kurodo no to (Head Chamberlain) in 1091, Sangi (councillor) in 1092, Sachujo (Middle Captain of the Left Division of the Inner Palace Guards) and Harima gon no kami (Provisional Governor of Harima Province) in 1093, rose to Jusanmi (Junior Third Rank) in 1096, Shosanmi (Senior Third Rank) in 1097, became Bicchu gon no kami (Provisional Governor of Bicchu Province) in 1098, Gon Chunagon (Provisional vice-counselor of state) in 1102, Shonii (Senior Second Rank) in 1103, and Gon Dainagon (Provisional chief counselor of state) in 1115.
    承保3年（1076年）侍従、承暦2年（1078年）従五位上兼丹後守、永保元年（1081年）従四位下、備中守（これ以前に少将）、右中将、同4年（1084年）正四位下、寛治5年（1091年）兼中宮権亮、蔵人頭、同6年（1092年）参議、同7年（1093年）左中将兼播磨権守、嘉保3年（1096年）従三位、永長2年（1097年）正三位、承徳2年（1098年）兼備中権守、康和4年（1102年）権中納言、同5年（1103年）正二位、永久(元号)3年（1115年）権大納言。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • An ultraviolet light washing chamber 48 is connected to the fifth washing chamber 39 of the final process to arrange them, and in the washing chamber 48, material to be washed 20f is subjected to ultraviolet washing by an ultraviolet lamp 49.
    被洗浄物を洗浄する洗浄媒体を有する複数の洗浄槽と、前記洗浄槽が設置された洗浄室と、前記洗浄槽の中の所定の洗浄槽内の洗浄媒体の温度および前記洗浄室内の雰囲気の温度をそれぞれ測定する各温度センサーと、前記各温度センサーの信号に基づいて前記洗浄媒体の温度および前記洗浄室内の雰囲気の温度調整する温度調整手段と、前記洗浄槽の中で最終洗浄工程で用いる洗浄槽に隣接するように前記洗浄室に連結して配置された紫外線光洗浄室と、を有する洗浄装置を提供する。 - 特許庁
  • A zoom lens comprises, in order from an object side: a first lens group G1 being positive; a second lens group G2 being negative; a third lens group G3 being positive; a fourth lens group G4 being negative; and a fifth lens group G5 being positive.
    物体側から順に、正の第１レンズ群Ｇ１と、負の第２レンズ群Ｇ２と、正の第３レンズ群Ｇ３と、負の第４レンズ群Ｇ４と、正の第５レンズ群Ｇ５からなるズームレンズにおいて、広角端から望遠端への変倍に際し、第１レンズ群は物体側に移動し、第３レンズ群は物体側に移動し、第４レンズ群は物体側に移動し、第１レンズ群と第２レンズ群との間隔が増加し、第２レンズ群と第３レンズ群との間隔が減少し、第３レンズ群と第４レンズ群との間隔が変化し、第４レンズ群と第５レンズ群との間隔が増加し、以下の条件式（１）、（２）、（３）を満たす。 - 特許庁
  • Article 19 (1) Each of permission, authorization or license for the Company listed in the fourth column granted by the person listed in the third column pursuant to the provisions listed in the second column of the Act listed in the first column of the following table shall be regarded as permission, authorization or license listed in the fifth column in said table for the Succeeding Companies which succeeded to the rights and obligations pertaining to said permission, authorization or license granted by the person listed in the third column pursuant to the provisions listed in the second column under the provisions of Article 7 of the Supplementary Provisions.
    第十九条　施行日前に次の表の第一欄に掲げる法律の同表の第二欄に掲げる規定により会社に対して同表の第三欄に掲げる者がした同表の第四欄に掲げる許可、認可又は免許は、それぞれ、同表の第二欄に掲げる規定により、附則第七条の定めるところにより当該許可、認可又は免許に係る権利及び義務を承継した承継会社に対して同表の第三欄に掲げる者がした同表の第五欄に掲げる許可、認可又は免許とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Subsequently, Prince Yoshihito's child, Prince Arisugawa no miya Tadahito, died without having any children, Emperor Reigen's Prince Arisugawa no miya Yorihito succeeded as the fifth court noble, followed by the sixth prince, Arisugawa no miya Orihito; the seventh prince, Arisugawa no miya Tsunahito; the eighth prince, Arisugawa no miya Takahito; the ninth prince, Arisugawa no miya Taruhito; and the tenth prince, Arisugawa no miya Takehito, it was passed down through the lineage; however, on January 5, 1913, after the death of Prince Takehito, it was definite that there was no successor to take over the family, so on June 29, 1923, the family name officially died after Princess Yasuko (Prince Takehito's wife) passed away.
    その後、幸仁親王の子・有栖川宮正仁親王が嗣子無く没したため、霊元天皇の皇子・有栖川宮職仁親王が入って第5代を継承し、以後、6代・有栖川宮織仁親王、7代・有栖川宮韶仁親王、8代・有栖川宮幟仁親王、9代・有栖川宮熾仁親王、10代・有栖川宮威仁親王と、いずれも直系を以って伝えたが、1913年（大正2年）1月5日、威仁親王の薨去によって実質的に断絶が確定し、1923年（大正12年）6月29日、威仁親王妃慰子の薨去によって正式に絶家となった。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • After Hancheong, which had been the capital of Yi Dynasty Korea, fell easily, Japanese commanders held a war council in June in Hancheong and determined targets of subjugation called Hachidokuniwari (literally, dividing the country into eight routes) by each corps (the First Division of Yukinaga KONISHI and others from Pyeongan Province, the Second Division of Kiyomasa KATO and others from Hangyong Province, the Third Division of Nagamasa KURODA and others from Hwanghae Province, the Forth Division of Yoshinari MORI and others from Gangwon Province; the Fifth Division of Masanori FUKUSHIMA and others from Chungcheong Province; the Sixth Division by Takakage KOBAYAKAWA and others from Jeolla Province, the Seventh Division by Terumoto MORI and others from Gyeongsang Province, and the Eighth Division of Hideie UKITA and others from Gyeonggi Province).
    容易に李氏朝鮮の首都である漢城が陥落すると、日本の諸将は5月に漢城にて軍議を開き、各方面軍による八道国割と呼ばれる制圧目標を決めた（平安道から一番隊小西行長他、咸鏡道から二番隊加藤清正他、黄海道から三番隊黒田長政他、江原道から四番隊毛利吉成他、忠清道から五番隊福島正則他、全羅道から六番隊小早川隆景他、慶尚道から七番隊毛利輝元他、京畿道から八番隊宇喜多秀家他）。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • Developing countries have traditionally been very cautious about establishing new procurement disciplines, but some have begun to realize the need for an agreement of this type. Accordingly, the November 2001 Ministerial Declaration issued at the Fourth Ministerial Conference in Doha included an agreement by Members to consider negotiating modalities for a multilateral agreement on transparency in government procurement, keeping in mind the need for enhanced capacity building in developing countries. However, members failed to agree on negotiating modalities by the Fifth Ministerial Conference in Cancun in September 2003.
    これまで、新たな規律策定に対する途上国の慎重な姿勢が目立っていたが、その後の議論を経て、一部の途上国にもかかる合意の必要性について理解が生まれ、2001年11月にドーハで開催された第４回閣僚会議における閣僚宣言では、途上国に対するキャパシティ・ビルディングの必要性を考慮しつつ、政府調達の透明性に関する多国間合意に向けた交渉の態様について検討を開始することが合意されたが、2003年９月のカンクン閣僚会議においては交渉の様態について合意できなかった。 - 経済産業省
  • For this reason, in 1998, “Grand Design for the 21st Century,” which is the Fifth Comprehensive National Development Plan, was formulated to promote the independence of local regions and creation of a beautiful country. This plan specifies five basic tasks including “promoting the independence of regions and creating regions which residents can take pride in.” Regarding domestic infrastructure investment, the plan points out the importance of making investments that fully reflect the characteristic of the relevant local region while planning for the next generation. As to industrial policies, it mentions about promoting the independence of local regions by means of revitalizing the competitiveness of regional industries.
    このため、1998年に策定された地域の自立の促進と美しい国土の創造を目指した第五次の全国総合開発計画である「21世紀の国土のグランドデザイン」では「自立の促進と誇りの持てる地域の創造」をはじめとした５つの基本課題を掲げるとともに、国土基盤投資について地域の特性を十分に踏まえた投資、次の時代に備えた投資の重要性、産業政策面では地域の産業競争力を再生することで地域の自立を促す点が指摘された。 - 経済産業省
  • (1) Upon request the Hungarian Patent Office may accord an exemption from the patent filing and search fee, the examination fee and granting fees as well as from the fees of applications for plant variety, utility model, design and topography protection, moreover the Office may grant deferment of maintenance fees of patent, plant variety and utility model protection for the period from the first till the fifth years, if the holder of the right as natural person ? due to his wages, income and financial standing ? is unable to cover them; the fees subject to the deferment shall be paid together with the maintenance fee for the sixth year.
    (1) 請求があったときは，ハンガリー特許庁は，特許出願及び調査手数料，審査及び付与手数料並びに植物品種，実用新案，意匠及び回路配置保護の出願手数料を免除することができ，更に，特許，植物品種及び実用新案保護の維持手数料を，1年目から5年目までの期間につき猶予することができる。ただし，自然人としての権利所有者が，その賃金，収入及び金融状態のために，手数料を納付できないことを条件とする。猶予対象となった手数料は，6年目の維持手数料と共に納付しなければならない。 - 特許庁
  • A certificate of registration shall remain in force for ten years; Provided, That, without need of any notice from the Office, the registrant shall file a declaration of actual use and evidence to that effect, or shall show valid reasons based on the existence of obstacles to such use, as prescribed by these Regulations, within one year from the fifth anniversary of the date of the registration of the mark. Otherwise, the Office shall remove the mark from the Register. Within one month from receipt of the declaration of actual use or reason for non-use, the Examiner shall notify the registrant of the action taken thereon such as acceptance or refusal.
    登録証は，10年間効力を有する。ただし，庁からの通知がなくても，登録人は，当該標章の登録日の第5周年日から1年以内に，本規則が定めるところに従い，実際の使用の宣言書及びその証拠を提出するか又は当該使用に対する障害の存在を根拠とする正当な理由を示さなければならない。そうしない場合は，庁は，当該標章を登録簿から抹消する。審査官は，実際の使用の宣言書又は不使用の理由書を受領してから1月以内に，これについて承認又は不承認等の処分を登録人に通知する。 - 特許庁
  • ii. Said lamp unit shall be installed such that, at the fifth point from the runway threshold among the points prescribed under "i" on the 30 meter-long straight line that crosses the extended line of a runway centerline (said "point" shall hereinafter under "ii" and "iii" be called "orthogonal cross point"), on a 4-meter straight line whose center matches said orthogonal cross point, 2 or 4 units are arranged in the positions in a section of 4.5 meters or more to 6 meters or less farther away from the orthogonal cross point and symmetrically against the extended line of runway centerline with approximately equal spacing of 0.9 meters or more to 3.6 meters or less.
    （二）　（一）の地点のうち滑走路末端から五番目の地点（以下（二）及び（三）において「直交点」という。）で滑走路中心線の延長線と直交する長さ約三十メートルの直線でその中心が直交点と一致するものの上の、直交点を中心に四メートルの部分に滑走路中心線の延長線に対し対称、かつ、ほぼ等間隔に二個又は四個、直交点から四・五メートル以上六メートル以下以遠の部分に滑走路中心線の延長線に対し対称に、〇・九メートル以上三・六メートル以下のほぼ等間隔に設置すること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • There is also a conjecture that he has same mother as Nobuhide ODA (Obora) by association between their childhood names, but this is not likely because of following reasons: currently the leading hypothesis is that Nobuhide's birth mother is the Inaba clan, and also it is said that Nobuhide's birth mother became a concubine of Hideyoshi; If this theory is correct, there is no way to explain why Nobutaka was only allowed to call himself with the last name of Hashiba and his official court rank was Jugoige (Junior Fifth Rank, Lower Grade) Saemon no suke (assistant captain of the Left Division of Outer Palace Guards) and his territory was limited to 2000 koku compared to Nobuhide who promoted to daimyo with around 20000 to 50000 koku of chamberlains in addition to be allowed to call himself with the last name of Hashiba as a family member of Hideyoshi.
    このほか、幼名との繋がりから織田信秀（大洞）と同腹との推測もあるが、信秀の生母は稲葉氏との推測が現在有力であり、また信秀生母は秀吉の側室となったと言われ、この説が正しいとすると信秀は秀吉の一族として羽柴姓を許されたほか侍従、2～5万石級の大名に昇進しているのに対して信高は羽柴姓を許されているのみで官位は従五位下佐衛門佐、所領も2000石どまりであることの説明がつかないことから、同腹である可能性は低いと思われる。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • The first case is the twenty-sixth Emperor Keitai (according to the Kojiki (Records of Ancient Matters) and the Nihonshoki (Chronicles of Japan)) who was supposed to be a descendant from five generations (grandson of great-grandson) of Emperor Ojin who lived in Echizen (present-day Fukui Prefecture) or Omi (Shiga Prefecture); there is a theory that he didn't succeed any bloodlines of former Emperors, leading to a dynastic change; however, it was identified that the genealogy, indicating that he was a descendant of Emperor Ojin, no later than the era of Empress Suiko, was handed down through recent research. Refer to Emperor Keitai.), after the death of the twenty-fifth Emperor Buretsu, Emperor Keitai moved from another province and ascended the throne since Emperor Buretsu's direct descendants were all female descendants (no male descendants).
    1つは第26代の継体天皇の場合であり（記紀による）、彼は越前（現在の福井県）もしくは近江（滋賀県）に住んでいた応神天皇の5世孫（曾孫の孫）とされており（それまでの天皇とは血のつながりがなく王朝交代となったとの説が存在するが、少なくとも推古天皇期には応神天皇子孫であったとの系譜伝承があったことも近年の研究から明らかになっている。継体天皇の項参照。）、第25代武烈天皇が死去した後、直系に女子はいたが男子がいなかったため地方から迎えられて天皇となった。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • “Non-violation,” which has been the subject of dispute settlement under GATT, refers to an action by a Member which, while not violating the TRIPS Agreement per se, infringes on the interest of other Members. The Doha Ministerial Declaration of 2001 called for the continued examination of this issue with a view to defining the scope and form of non-violation by the Fifth WTO Ministerial Conference. Although the General Council, in July 2004, decided to continue deliberations until the Sixth Ministerial Conference, work was not completed by the end of this period. It was decided in the Hong Kong Ministerial Conference of December 2005 that postponement of application would be extended to the Seventh WTO Ministerial Conference.
    協定上の義務には違反しないものの、他の加盟国の措置の結果として自国の利益が侵害されるため、GATT において紛争解決手段の対象とされているノン・バイオレーションについては、その範囲と形式についての検討作業を、2001年のドーハ閣僚宣言ではWTO第５回閣僚会議まで、2004年７月の一般理事会では第６回閣僚会議まで継続することとされたが、期限までに作業の終了には至らず、2005年12月の香港閣僚会議にて、適用猶予期限を次回のWTO第７回閣僚会議まで延長することが決定された。 - 経済産業省
  • (ii) For an extinct stock company or Absorbing Stock Company, a document certifying that the number of the Policyholders who raised their objections within the period set forth in Article 165-7, paragraph (2), item (iv) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-12) has not exceeded one fifth of the total number of Policyholders set forth in Article 70, paragraph (6) (including the cases where it is applied with relevant changes in interpretation pursuant to the provision of Article 255, paragraph (2) (hereinafter referred to as "The Cases of Application with Relevant Changes in Interpretation Pursuant to the Provision of Article 255, paragraph (2)"in this item); hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-7, paragraph (4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-12; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) (or, in The Cases of Application with Relevant Changes in Interpretation Pursuant to the Provision of Article 255, paragraph (2), one tenth of such total number), or a document certifying that the amount of credits specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance set forth in Article 70, paragraph (6) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-7, paragraph (4) as belonging to such Policyholders has not exceeded one fifth (or, in The Cases of Application with Relevant Changes in Interpretation Pursuant to the Provision of Article 255, paragraph (2), one tenth) of the total amount set forth in Article 70, paragraph (6) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-7, paragraph (4);
    二　消滅株式会社又は吸収合併存続株式会社にあっては、第百六十五条の七第二項第四号（第百六十五条の十二において準用する場合を含む。）の期間内に異議を述べた保険契約者の数が第百六十五条の七第四項（第百六十五条の十二において準用する場合を含む。以下この号において同じ。）において準用する第七十条第六項（第二百五十五条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合（以下この号において単に「第二百五十五条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この号において同じ。）の保険契約者の総数の五分の一（第二百五十五条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合にあっては、十分の一）を超えなかったことを証する書面又はその者の第百六十五条の七第四項において準用する第七十条第六項の内閣府令で定める金額が第百六十五条の七第四項において準用する第七十条第六項の金額の総額の五分の一（第二百五十五条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合にあっては、十分の一）を超えなかったことを証する書面 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (iii) For an extinct Mutual Company or Absorbing Mutual Company, a document certifying that the number of the Policyholders who raised their objections within the period set forth in Article 165-17, paragraph (2), item (iii) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-20) has not exceeded one fifth of the total number of Policyholders set forth in Article 88, paragraph (6) (including the cases where it is applied with relevant changes in interpretation pursuant to the provision of Article 255, paragraph (2) (hereinafter referred to as "The Cases of Application with Relevant Changes in Interpretation Pursuant to the Provision of Article 255, paragraph (2)"in this item); hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-17, paragraph (4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-20; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) (or, in The Cases of Application with Relevant Changes in Interpretation Pursuant to the Provision of Article 255, paragraph (2), one tenth of such total number), or a document certifying that the amount of credits specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance set forth in Article 88, paragraph (6) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-17, paragraph (4) as belonging to such Policyholders has not exceeded one fifth (or, in The Cases of Application with Relevant Changes in Interpretation Pursuant to the Provision of Article 255, paragraph (2), one tenth) of the total amount set forth in Article 88, paragraph (6) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-17, paragraph (4);
    三　消滅相互会社又は吸収合併存続相互会社にあっては、第百六十五条の十七第二項第三号（第百六十五条の二十において準用する場合を含む。）の期間内に異議を述べた保険契約者の数が第百六十五条の十七第四項（第百六十五条の二十において準用する場合を含む。以下この号において同じ。）において準用する第八十八条第六項（第二百五十五条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合（以下この号において単に「第二百五十五条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この号において同じ。）の保険契約者の総数の五分の一（第二百五十五条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合にあっては、十分の一）を超えなかったことを証する書面又はその者の第百六十五条の十七第四項において準用する第八十八条第六項の内閣府令で定める金額が第百六十五条の十七第四項において準用する第八十八条第六項の金額の総額の五分の一（第二百五十五条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合にあっては、十分の一）を超えなかったことを証する書面 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) In patent grant procedures relating to technological sectors for which the grant procedure with prior examination under the Royal Decree referred to in the Fifth Transitional Provision is applicable, once publication of the report on the state of the art has taken place, the period provided for in Article 39(2) shall start, suspending the proceedings, during which time the applicant may file the request for prior examination or express his desire to continue with the general grant procedure. Where that period expires without the applicant having made a statement on the subject, the procedure shall resume in accordance with the provisions of the foregoing paragraphs, with the provisions on the general grant procedure laid down in this Chapter being applicable. Resumption shall be announced in the Official Bulletin of Industrial Property.
    (3) 経過規定の第5に述べる国王令に基づき事前審査を適用する技術分野に係る特許付与手続において，一旦，技術水準に関する報告書が公開された場合，当該手続を棚上げし第39条(2)に定める期間が開始するものとする。当該期間中に，出願人は事前審査を請求するか又は通常の付与手続を継続する意図を表明することができる。出願人がこの主題について意見を表明することなく期間が満了した場合は，前各項の規定に従い，この章に定める通常の付与手続に係る規定を適用し手続を再開するものとする。当該手続再開は，産業財産公報に公示される。 - 特許庁
  • Article 158 In cases where a Specific Purpose Company is to acquire, within two years of its incorporation, property that has existed since before its incorporation and which it will use continuously for its business, it shall obtain approval for the contract of such acquisition through a resolution made at a general meeting of members by the day prior to the day when said acquisition takes effect; provided, however that this shall not apply to cases where the ratio of the amount listed in item (i) to the amount listed in item (ii) does not exceed one-fifth (if a smaller ratio is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a ratio) or where the property acquired under said contract is a Specified Asset prescribed in the Asset Securitization Plan:
    第百五十八条　特定目的会社は、その成立後二年以内に、その成立前から存在する財産であってその事業のために継続して使用するものの取得をする場合には、当該取得がその効力を生ずる日の前日までに、社員総会の決議によって、当該取得に係る契約の承認を受けなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる額の第二号に掲げる額に対する割合が五分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）を超えないとき、又は当該契約により取得する財産が資産流動化計画に定められた特定資産であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • 3. Trademarks and trade names not included in the preceding paragraph the grant of which has been published, or the last renewal of which has been applied for under the terms of the 1988 Law on Trademarks, but prior to the entry into force of Law 14/1999 on Fees and Public Prices for Services Provided by the Nuclear Safety Council, shall be subject, up to the first renewal made following the entry into force of this Law, to payment of the corresponding five-year fees, on pain of lapse. For these purposes, the expiry date of the second five-year term shall be the last day of the month in which the fifth anniversary of the filing date of the original registration application falls, and the corresponding payment shall be made within the three months preceding the expiry date or in the month following said date.
    (3) 前項に含まれない商標及び商号であって，その付与が公告されている，又はその最後の更新が1988年商標法の規定に基づいて出願されたが，原子核安全理事会により提供されるサービスについての手数料及び公定料金に関する法律(法律No.14/1999)の施行前であったものは，本法の施行後に行われた初回更新まで，対応する5年ごとの手数料の納付を条件とするが，失効の罰則付きとする。これらの目的で，第2回の5年の期間の納付期日は原登録出願の出願日の5周年月の末日とし，対応する納付は納付期日に先立つ3月以内又は当該期日の翌月に行うものとする。 - 特許庁
  • His children played many important roles in the imperial court: Yoshiaki KAJUJI became Sangi (councilor); Kunitoyo SHIBAYAMA who was adopted by Gon Dainagon Mochitoyo SHIBAYAMA became Kudai-taifu (post of imperial household ministry); Tameoki REIZEI who was adopted by Gon Dainagon Tamesato REIZEI served at Konoefu (the headquarters of the inner palace guards); a daughter became the wife of Gon Chunagon (provisional middle councilor) Yasuchika HORIKAWA; Tadako KAJUJI (Higashikyogokuin) became Jusango and Naishi no suke (handmaid) for Emperor Kokaku and bore Emperor Ninko; Toshiaki BOJO who was adopted by Gon Dainagon Toshichika BOJO became Gon Dainagon as well; Tokuko KAJUJI became Naishi no suke for Emperor Ninko; a daughter became the wife of Gon Dainagon Tatefusa MADENOKOJI: a daughter became the wife of Gon Chunagon Kinnori OGIMACHISANJO; a daughter became the wife of Jun-daijin (vice minister) Sukenaru HINO; a daughter became the wife of Gon Dainagon Tokiakira HIRAMATSU, a daughter became the wife of Michinori ANDO who was Iga no kami (governor of Iga Province), Tsuke-garo (attendant chief retainer) of the Kii family, and the lord of the Kii Tanabe Domain; Tsunechika KAJUJI attained Jugoinoge (junior fifth rank, lower grade); a daughter became the wife of Chunagon (middle councilor) Nagamasa TAKAKURA.
    実子に、参議・勧修寺良顕、宮内大輔・芝山国豊（権大納言・芝山持豊の養子）、近衛府・冷泉為起（権大納言・冷泉為訓の養子）、権中納言・堀河康親の室、東京極院・勧修寺ただ子（准三后、光格天皇の典侍、仁孝天皇の生母）、権大納言・坊城俊明（権大納言・坊城俊親の養子）、勧修寺徳子（仁孝天皇の典侍）、権大納言・万里小路建房の室、権中納言・正親町三条公則の室、准大臣・日野資愛の室、権大納言・平松時章の室、伊賀守・安藤直則（紀伊家付家老、紀伊田辺藩主）の室、従五位下・勧修寺経睦、中納言・高倉永雅の室など。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • (a) Where, with regard to the amount of the rehabilitation debtor's salary or similar regular income, reemployment or any other event that should cause a fluctuation amounting to not less than one-fifth of his/her annual income has occurred at a certain time within two years prior to the submission of the proposed rehabilitation plan: The amount obtained by deducting, from the total income earned during the period from when such event occurred until the proposed rehabilitation plan was submitted, the amount of income tax, prefectural inhabitants tax or Tokyo inhabitants tax on individuals, and municipal inhabitants tax or special ward inhabitants tax on individuals as well as social insurance premiums prescribed in Article 74(2) of the Income Tax Act (Act No. 33 of 1965) (referred to as "income tax, etc." in (b) and (c)) imposed on such total amount, as converted into the amount per year
    イ　再生債務者の給与又はこれに類する定期的な収入の額について、再生計画案の提出前二年間の途中で再就職その他の年収について五分の一以上の変動を生ずべき事由が生じた場合　当該事由が生じた時から再生計画案を提出した時までの間の収入の合計額からこれに対する所得税、個人の道府県民税又は都民税及び個人の市町村民税又は特別区民税並びに所得税法（昭和四十年法律第三十三号）第七十四条第二項に規定する社会保険料（ロ及びハにおいて「所得税等」という。）に相当する額を控除した額を一年間当たりの額に換算した額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Based on the Guidelines regarding National Reports under the Convention on Nuclear Safety (INFCIRC/572/Rev.3) adopted by the First Extraordinary Meeting of Nuclear Safety Convention in September 2009, the National Report of Japan for the Fifth Review Meeting was prepared by NISA of the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (hereinafter referred to as METI), which is the regulatory body of nuclear installations under the Convention.The National Report was prepared in cooperation with the governmental organizations including the Agency of Natural Resources and Energy of METI, the Cabinet Office (the Atomic Energy Commission (hereinafter referred to as AEC))and the Nuclear Safety Commission (hereinafter referred to as NSC)), the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (hereinafter referred to as MEXT), the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare and Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as well as the Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization (hereinafter referred to as JNES), Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Atomic Energy Agency (hereinafter referred to as JAEA) and the Federation of Electric Power Companies.
    原子力の安全に関する条約第5回日本国国別報告は、2009年9月に開催された原子力の安全に関する条約第1回特別会合で採択された国別報告に関するガイドライン（INFCIRC/572/Rev.3）に基づき、この条約の適用対象である発電用原子炉施設の規制を行っている経済産業省原子力安全・保安院が、経済産業省資源エネルギー庁、内閣府（原子力委員会及び原子力安全委員会）、文部科学省、厚生労働省及び外務省の政府機関のほか、独立行政法人原子力安全基盤機構、独立行政法人日本原子力研究開発機構及び電気事業連合会の協力を得て作成したものである。 - 経済産業省
  • Article 144-7 (1) The provisions from paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive of the preceding Article shall not apply when the proportion of the amount set forth in item (i) to the amount set forth in item (ii) does not exceed one-fifth (or, if a smaller proportion has been specified by the articles of incorporation of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such proportion); provided, however, that this shall not apply in the cases listed in the respective items of paragraph (2) of the same Article or in the case where the whole or a part of the Shares, etc. delivered to members of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger are transfer restricted shares of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger and when the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is a Publicly-Held Company (which means a publicly-held company prescribed in Article 2, item (v) of the Companies Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section).
    第百四十四条の七　前条第一項から第三項までの規定は、第一号に掲げる額の第二号に掲げる額に対する割合が五分の一（これを下回る割合を吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の定款で定めた場合にあつては、その割合）を超えない場合には、適用しない。ただし、同条第二項各号に掲げる場合又は吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の会員に対して交付する株式等の全部又は一部が吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の譲渡制限株式である場合であつて、吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所が公開会社（会社法第二条第五号に規定する公開会社をいう。以下この節において同じ。）でないときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Tsuneosa KASHUJI (Although he was born on November 21, 1825, his birthday was officially recorded as November 18, 1828): in "Yamashiro no Kuni Kyoto SODEOKA Genbanosuke Kaki" (The Family Chronicle of Genbanosuke SODEOKA in Kyoto, Yamashiro Province), (housed in the National Institute of Japanese Literature), written by Fumikage SODEOKA, a Jige official (the government officials of lower- ranked courtiers who were not allowed to enter the court) and a Zassho (or Karei: butler) served for the Kashuji family, who was asked to be a private tutor of Tsuneosa by Nariko KASHUJI, it is read '.....Mansenhime who came to the family as a bride gave a birth to Tsuneosa on October twelfth in the eighth year of the Bunsei era, so Tsuneosa's true age was fifteen years old this year; however it was recorded that he was only twelve years old when he was conferred Jugoinoge (Junior Fifth Rank, Lower Grade) as his first court rank....' in the section of April 8, the tenth year of the Tempo era, which means his age was reported three years younger than actual for the official recording.
    勧修寺経理（かしゅうじつねおさ、文政8年10月12日(旧暦)（1825年11月21日）公式の記録類では、生日を文政11年10月12日（1828年11月18日）とされているが、勧修寺家の雑掌などを務め、尚侍勧修寺徳子より経理の教育係に任じられた地下人官人袖岡文景の日記『山城国京都袖岡玄蕃助家記』（国文学研究資料館所蔵）天保10年4月8日条に「……山科殿より御入輿万千姫御腹文政八年十月十二日御出生、当年真実十五歳、（中略）漸至当春稲丸殿御家督治定、御年齢真実十五歳候所、相省十二歳ヲ以今般初位従五位下御申上ニ相成候……」と記しており、年齢を3歳ずらして届け出たことを記している。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • According to the "the origin and the history of rakusui-shi production" written by Kozo TAMURA, the fifth head of the Tamagawa-do Store, 'While domestic Chinese paper production requires a large amount of materials and labor, Chinese paper made in China is cheaper. In addition, the usage of Western paper is increasing more and more, which can interfere with continuing this domestic Chinese paper production over a long period. Thus, this "rakusui-shi" paper was invented as a result of tremendous trials of designs and ideas during the first year of the Meiji period (1868). Now, "Tamagawa" is only valid as a store name, and a paper mill has been operated in Sugamo village, named after a waterfowl, which is located in the north end of Tokyo where birds sing. We have produced this paper every day as our principal occupation. This paper, however, was not completely invented by myself. The original idea was hit upon by the previous head (Sakichi TAMURA) and I completed it. Because his pseudonym was "Rakusui," I named this paper as "rakusui-shi" after him.'
    玉川堂五代目田村綱造の『楽水紙製造起源及び沿革』によると、「和製唐紙の原料及び労力の多きに比し、支邦製唐紙の安価なると、西洋紙の使途ますます多きに圧され、この製唐紙業の永く継続し得べからざるより、ここに明治初年大いに意匠工夫を凝らしし結果、この楽水紙といふ紙を製することを案出し、今は玉川も名のみにて、鳥が鳴く東の京の北の端なる水鳥の巣鴨の村に一つの製紙場を構え、日々この紙を漉くことをもて専業とするに至れり。もっとも此の紙は全く余が考案せしものにはあらず、その源は先代（田村佐吉）に萌し、余がこれを大成せしものなれば、先代号を楽水といへるより、これをそのまま取りて楽水紙と名ずける。」とある。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • (1) The provisions from paragraphs 1 to 3 inclusive of the preceding Article shall not apply when the proportion of the amount set forth in item 1 to the amount set forth in item 2 does not exceed one-fifth (or, if a smaller proportion has been specified by the articles of incorporation of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such proportion); provided, however, that this shall not apply in the cases listed in the respective items of paragraph 2 of the same Article or in the case where the whole or a part of the Shares of Stock, etc. delivered to members of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger are transfer restricted shares of stock of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger and when the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is a Publicly-Held Company (which means a publicly-held company prescribed in Article 2, item 5 of the Company Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section).
    １ 前条第一項から第三項までの規定は、第一号に掲げる額の第二号に掲げる額に対する割合が五分の一（これを下回る割合を吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の定款で定めた場合にあつては、その割合）を超えない場合には、適用しない。ただし、同条第二項各号に掲げる場合又は吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の会員に対して交付する株式等の全部又は一部が吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の譲渡制限株式である場合であつて、吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所が公開会社（会社法第二条第五号に規定する公開会社をいう。以下この節において同じ。）でないときは、この限りでない。 - 経済産業省
  • (2) In the event of opposition to a patent, a third party who proves that legal action has been filed against him on the grounds of infringement of said patent may, after the opposition period has expired, intervene in the opposition proceedings as opponent, provided said opponent gives notice of intervention within three months of the date on which the infringement action was instituted. The same shall apply to any third party who proves that, after patentee demands that he cease and desist the alleged infringement, he, has filed a legal action against said patentee requesting a ruling declaring that he is not infringing the patent. Notice of intervention shall be filed in writing and shall state the reasons for said intervention before expiration of the time limit mentioned in the first sentence. The third to fifth sentences of subsection (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
    (2) 特許に対する異議申立の場合は，第三者であって，同人を相手として当該特許の侵害を理由とする訴訟が提起されていることを証明する者は，異議申立期間の満了後，その異議申立手続に異議申立人として参加することができるが，ただし，当該異議申立人が，侵害訴訟が提起された日から 3月以内に参加通知書を出すことを条件とする。同一規定が，第三者であって，特許所有者が同人は侵害と称されている行為を中止するよう要求した後，特許所有者を相手方とし，同人は特許を侵害していない旨の確認を要求する訴訟を提起していることを証明する者に適用される。参加通知は，第 1文にいう期限の到来前に書面により提出しなければならず，かつ，当該参加の理由を記述していなければならない。(1)第 3文から第 5文までが準用される。 - 特許庁
  • Article 139-9 (1) The provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2) of the preceding Article shall not apply to cases where the proportion of the amount set forth in item (i) to the amount set forth in item (ii) does not exceed one-fifth (or, if a smaller proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation of the Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such proportion); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where all or part of the Shares, etc. delivered to members of a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Extinguished upon an Absorption-Type Merger are shares with restriction on transfer of the Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger and where the Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is not a Public Company (meaning a Public Company prescribed in Article 2(v) of the Companies Act; the same shall apply in paragraph (2), item (i) of the following Article and 139-15(3)):
    第百三十九条の九　前条第一項及び第二項の規定は、第一号に掲げる額の第二号に掲げる額に対する割合が五分の一（これを下回る割合を吸収合併存続株式会社金融商品取引所が定款で定めた場合にあつては、その割合）を超えない場合には、適用しない。ただし、吸収合併消滅会員金融商品取引所の会員に対して交付する株式等の全部又は一部が吸収合併存続株式会社金融商品取引所の譲渡制限株式である場合であつて、吸収合併存続株式会社金融商品取引所が公開会社（会社法第二条第五号に規定する公開会社をいう。次条第二項第一号及び第百三十九条の十五第三項において同じ。）でないときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 135, paragraph (2) and Article 137, paragraph (4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 210, paragraph (1) and Article 272-29; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) in the case where insurance contracts are to be transferred as set forth in the paragraph (1) in the preceding Article, "insurance contracts for which an insured event has already occurred at the Time of Public Notice set forth in Article 137, paragraph (1) (limited to insurance contracts which would be terminated with the payment of insurance claims pertaining to the insured event) and any other insurance contracts specified by a Cabinet Order" in Article 135, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Contracts prescribed in Article 250, paragraph (3)," and the terms "one fifth" and "at the Time of Public Notice under the provision of paragraph (1) with regard to said insurance contracts" in Article 137, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "one tenth" and "for said insurance contracts, in the case that said insurance contracts are Specified Contracts as prescribed in Article 250, paragraph (3)," respectively.
    ２　前条第一項の保険契約の移転をする場合における第百三十五条第二項及び第百三十七条第四項（第二百十条第一項及び第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定の適用については、第百三十五条第二項中「第百三十七条第一項の公告の時において既に保険事故が発生している保険契約（当該保険事故に係る保険金の支払により消滅することとなるものに限る。）その他の政令で定める保険契約」とあるのは「第二百五十条第三項に規定する特定契約」と、第百三十七条第四項中「五分の一」とあるのは「十分の一」と、「当該保険契約について、第一項の規定による公告の時において」とあるのは「当該保険契約が第二百五十条第三項に規定する特定契約である場合において、当該保険契約につき」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (2) With regard to the application of the provision of Article 70, paragraph (6), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-7, paragraph (4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-12), Article 88, paragraph (6), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-17, paragraph (4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-20), or Article 165-24, paragraph (6) in the case where a merger is to be made as set forth in paragraph (1) in the preceding Article, in these provisions, the term "insurance contracts under which the right to Insurance Claims, etc., had already arisen at the Time of Public Notice under the provision of that paragraph (limited to those contracts that would be terminated with payment pertaining to said right to Insurance Claims, etc.)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "insurance contracts prescribed in Article 250, paragraph (3), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 254, paragraph (2)," the term "one fifth" shall be deemed to be replaced with "one tenth," the term "Right to Insurance Claims, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "insurance claims pertaining to the Specified Contracts prescribed in Article 250, paragraph (3), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 254, paragraph (2), and any other rights specified by a Cabinet Order."
    ２　前条第一項の合併をする場合における第百六十五条の七第四項（第百六十五条の十二において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する第七十条第六項、第百六十五条の十七第四項（第百六十五条の二十において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する第八十八条第六項又は第百六十五条の二十四第六項の規定の適用については、これらの規定中「同項の規定による公告の時において既に保険金請求権等が生じている保険契約（当該保険金請求権等に係る支払により消滅することとなるものに限る。）」とあるのは「第二百五十四条第二項において準用する第二百五十条第三項に規定する特定契約」と、「五分の一」とあるのは「十分の一」と、「保険金請求権等」とあるのは「第二百五十四条第二項において準用する第二百五十条第三項に規定する特定契約に係る保険金請求権その他の政令で定める権利」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 11 (1) The alien shall apply to the mayor or the head of the city, town or village where he/she resides, within 30 days of the fifth anniversary (in the case of the alien being a permanent resident or a special permanent resident on the day on which the initial or other registration was made, it shall be the seventh anniversary) of the alien's birthday (where his/her birthday falls on February 29, it shall be deemed as February 28) commencing from the year in which the registration under Article 4, paragraph (1) (in cases where the confirmation was made under Article 6, paragraph (3), Article 6-2, paragraph (4), or Article 7, paragraph (3), based on the application under this paragraph or the next paragraph, (in paragraph (3), this confirmation is referred to as "the latest confirmation") is to mean the day on which the latest confirmation was made. In this paragraph, this day is referred to as "the day on which the initial or other registration was made), by submitting the documents and photographs specified in the following items, for confirmation of whether the entries in the registration card correspond to the actual facts. However, this shall not apply to any alien who was less than sixteen years of age on the day when the application under Article 3, paragraph (1) was made (in cases where the alien ever made an application under Article 6, paragraph (1), Article 6-2, paragraph (1) or (2), or Article 7, paragraph (1), on the day on which such application was made):
    第十一条　外国人は、第四条第一項の登録を受けた日（第六条第三項、第六条の二第四項若しくは第七条第三項の確認又はこの項若しくは次項の申請に基づく確認（第三項において「登録後の確認」という。）を受けた場合には、最後に確認を受けた日。この項において「登録等を受けた日」という。）の後の当該外国人の五回目（登録等を受けた日に当該外国人が永住者又は特別永住者であるときは、七回目）の誕生日（当該外国人の誕生日が二月二十九日であるときは、当該外国人の誕生日は二月二十八日であるものとみなす。）から三十日以内に、その居住地の市町村の長に対し、次に掲げる書類及び写真を提出して、登録原票の記載が事実に合つているかどうかの確認を申請しなければならない。ただし、第三条第一項の申請をした日（第六条第一項、第六条の二第一項若しくは第二項又は第七条第一項の申請をしたことがある者であるときは、その申請をした日）において十六歳未満であつた者については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 69 (1) With regard to the dissolution and liquidation of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 475 (excluding item (i) and item (iii)), Article 476, Article 478, paragraph (2) and paragraph (4), Article 479, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portions other than those listed in the respective items), Article 481, Article 483, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 484, Article 485, Article 489, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 492, paragraphs (1) to (3), Articles 499 to 503, Article 507 (Liquidation of a Stock Company), Article 868, paragraph (1), Article 869, Article 870 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)), Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (iv)), Article 874 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)), Article 875, and Article 876 (Non-Contentious Cases) of the Companies Act and Article 40 (Judicial Decision for Appointment of a Person to Conduct Inspections) of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedure Act (Act No. 14 of 1898) shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 35-3, Article 35-4, Article 36-2, Article 36-3, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Articles 36-5 to 38-4 (excluding Article 36-7, paragraph (4)), Article 40 (excluding paragraph (1), paragraph (11), and paragraph (13)), Article 47, paragraphs (2) to (4), Article 48, and Article 53-2 of this Act, the provisions of Article 357, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act, paragraph (1) of the same Article as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing the terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 360, paragraph (3) of the same Act, and the provisions of Article 361, Article 381, paragraph (2), Article 382, the main clause of Article 383, paragraph (1), Article 383, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3), Articles 384 to 386, and Article 508 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to an action to pursue the liability of a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Part 7, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (2), item (ii) and paragraph (5), and Article 851, and excluding the portions pertaining to the company auditors in the case of a cooperative limiting the audit authority)(Action to Pursue the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; and with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative limiting the audit authority, the provisions of Article 353, Article 360, paragraph (1) and Article 364 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the phrase "an inventory of property, a balance sheet, a profit and loss statement, and a plan for the appropriation of surplus or a plan for the disposal of losses" in Article 40, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an inventory of property and a balance sheet," the term "a business report" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "an affairs written report," the term "business report" in paragraph (3), paragraphs (5) to (10), and paragraph (12), item (i) and item (iii) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "affairs written report," the term "the directors (or, for a Company with Board of Directors, to the board of directors)" in Article 382 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the board of liquidators," the term "the following shareholders" in the portions of Article 479, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act other than those listed in the respective items shall be deemed to be "a member who has obtained the consent of or more one-fifth of all partner," the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in Article 384, Article 492, paragraph (1), Article 507, paragraph (1), and Article 847, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) of the same Act shall be deemed to be "ordinance of the competent ministry," the phrase "give public notice in the official gazette" in Article 499, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "give public notice," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    第六十九条　組合の解散及び清算については、会社法第四百七十五条（第一号及び第三号を除く。）、第四百七十六条、第四百七十八条第二項及び第四項、第四百七十九条第一項及び第二項（各号列記以外の部分に限る。）、第四百八十一条、第四百八十三条第四項及び第五項、第四百八十四条、第四百八十五条、第四百八十九条第四項及び第五項、第四百九十二条第一項から第三項まで、第四百九十九条から第五百三条まで、第五百七条（株式会社の清算）、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百六十九条、第八百七十条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十五条並びに第八百七十六条（非訟）並びに非訟事件手続法（明治三十一年法律第十四号）第四十条（検査をすべき者の選任の裁判）の規定を、組合の清算人については、第三十五条の三、第三十五条の四、第三十六条の二、第三十六条の三第一項及び第二項、第三十六条の五から第三十八条の四まで（第三十六条の七第四項を除く。）、第四十条（第一項、第十一項及び第十三項を除く。）、第四十七条第二項から第四項まで、第四十八条並びに第五十三条の二並びに会社法第三百五十七条第一項、同法第三百六十条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する同条第一項並びに同法第三百六十一条、第三百八十一条第二項、第三百八十二条、第三百八十三条第一項本文、第二項及び第三項、第三百八十四条から第三百八十六条まで並びに第五百八条の規定を、組合の清算人の責任を追及する訴えについては、同法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項第二号及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除き、監査権限限定組合にあつては、監査役に係る部分を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定を、監査権限限定組合の清算人については、同法第三百五十三条、第三百六十条第一項及び第三百六十四条の規定を準用する。この場合において、第四十条第二項中「財産目録、貸借対照表、損益計算書、剰余金処分案又は損失処理案」とあるのは「財産目録、貸借対照表」と、「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同条第三項、第五項から第十項まで並びに第十二項第一号及び第三号中「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同法第三百八十二条中「取締役（取締役会設置会社にあっては、取締役会）」とあるのは「清算人会」と、同法第四百七十九条第二項各号列記以外の部分中「次に掲げる株主」とあるのは「総組合員の五分の一以上の同意を得た組合員」と、同法第三百八十四条、第四百九十二条第一項、第五百七条第一項並びに第八百四十七条第一項及び第四項中「法務省令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、同法第四百九十九条第一項中「官報に公告し」とあるのは「公告し」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
＜前へ 1 2 .... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123

例文データの著作権について