「Lesser」を含む例文一覧(423)

＜前へ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
  • (2) When a member has requested the convocation of the general meeting by submitting a document stating the matter to be discussed at the meeting and the reason for the convocation to the council, by gaining the consent of or more one-fifth of all partner (in the case where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of association, such proportion), the council shall decide to convene the extraordinary general meeting within twenty days from the date of the request.
    ２　組合員が総組合員の五分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあつては、その割合）以上の同意を得て、会議の目的である事項及び招集の理由を記載した書面を理事会に提出して総会の招集を請求したときは、理事会は、その請求のあつた日から二十日以内に臨時総会を招集すべきことを決しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • In this manner, the wireless communication system can accommodate an IC card that uses a new encryption method more easily relative to a conventional wireless communication system only by adding the module to the roadside device 30 and the roadside device 40 (because the roadside devices are generally smaller in number in comparison to the onboard devices in the operation of the system, and lesser in demand for space efficiency and cost reduction).
    このように構成すれば、システムを新たに別の暗号手法を用いるＩＣカードに対応させる場合でも、登録用路側装置３０及び収受用路側装置４０に同モジュールを追加するだけでよいため、従来より容易に対応させることができる（∵一般的に路側装置は、システム運用時における運用台数が車載装置に比べて少ない上、小型化やコストダウンに対する要求度合いも車載装置に比べて少ないため）。 - 特許庁
  • He had one brother, TAIRA no Chikamune, and sisters TAIRA no Tokiko (Kiyomori's wife), TAIRA no Shigeko (Kenshunmonin), Reizei no Tsubone (a court lady for Kenshunmonin), Kiyoko (Munemori's wife), Bomon-dono (Shigemori's wife; she may have been Koremori's mother), wife of FUJIWARA no Chikataka (mother of gon shosozu (Junior lesser prelate), Zenshin), and Sochi no Tsubone (court lady for Kenreimonin); his wife was FUJIWARA no Muneko; and, he had sons, TAIRA no Tokizane, TAIRA no Tokiie, Tokimune, and Tokisada, and daughters, Noriko (later, tenji (a maid of honor of the first rank) to the Emperor Gotoba), MINAMOTO no Yoshitsune's concubine, and Tadachika NAKAYAMA's wife.
    兄弟に平親宗、姉妹に平時子（清盛の室）・平滋子（建春門院）・冷泉局（建春門院女房）・清子（宗盛の室）・坊門殿（重盛の室、維盛母の可能性あり）・藤原親隆の室（権少僧都・全真の母）・帥局（建礼門院女房）、室に藤原領子（むねこ）、子に平時実、平時家、時宗、時定、宣子（後鳥羽天皇の典侍）、源義経の側室、中山忠親の室らがいる。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
  • (3) The provisions of the preceding Article and the preceding paragraph shall not apply in cases where the sum of the book value of the assets that the Succeeding Company in Absorption-type Company Split succeeds to through the Absorption-type Company Split does not exceed one-fifth (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation of the Splitting Stock Company in Absorption-type Company Split, such proportion) of the amount calculated by the method specified by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as the total assets of the Splitting Stock Company in Absorption-type Company Split.
    ３　前条及び前項の規定は、吸収分割により吸収分割承継会社に承継させる資産の帳簿価額の合計額が吸収分割株式会社の総資産額として法務省令で定める方法により算定される額の五分の一（これを下回る割合を吸収分割株式会社の定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）を超えない場合には、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 805 The provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article shall not apply in cases where the sum of the book value of the assets that the Company Incorporated through Incorporation-type Company Split succeeds to through the Incorporation-type Company Split does not exceed one-fifth (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation of the Splitting Stock Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split, such proportion) of the amount calculated by the method specified by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as the total assets of the Splitting Stock Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split.
    第八百五条　前条第一項の規定は、新設分割により新設分割設立会に承継させる資産の帳簿価額の合計額が新設分割株式会社の総資産額として法務省令で定める方法により算定される額の五分の一（これを下回る割合を新設分割株式会社の定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）を超えない場合には、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • At larger enterprises, attempts to change existing routines tend to be met by organizational resistance. They can also cause cannibalization among divisions, and it is difficult to engage in development work where market size is difficult to predict. Smaller enterprises, on the other hand, are better able to engage in activities involving radical changes due to their greater ability to tackle challenges flexibly at the entrepreneur's initiative, and lesser organizational resistance.
    規模が大きい企業にとっては、既存のルーティンを変更してしまうような取組には組織的抵抗が生じやすいこと、部門間でのカニバリゼーションを起こす可能性があることや、市場規模の予測が難しい開発には取り組みにくいのに対し、規模が小さい企業においては、経営者の意向で機動的に取り組むことができることや、組織的抵抗も少ないことから、このような飛躍的変化を伴う取組を行うことができるのであろう。 - 経済産業省
  • Article 305 (1) Shareholders may demand the directors that, no later than eight weeks (or, in cases where any period less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) prior to the day of the shareholders meeting, shareholders be notified of the summary of the proposals which such demanding shareholders intend to submit with respect to the matters that are the purpose of the shareholders meeting (or, in cases where a notice pursuant to paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of Article 299 is to be given, such summary be specified or recorded in that notice); provided, however, that, for a Company with Board of Directors, only shareholders having consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more) not less than one hundredth (1/100) (or, in cases where lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the votes of all shareholders or not less than three hundred (or, in cases where lesser number is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such number of) votes of all shareholders may make such demand.
    第三百五条　株主は、取締役に対し、株主総会の日の八週間（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前までに、株主総会の目的である事項につき当該株主が提出しようとする議案の要領を株主に通知すること（第二百九十九条第二項又は第三項の通知をする場合にあっては、その通知に記載し、又は記録すること）を請求することができる。ただし、取締役会設置会社においては、総株主の議決権の百分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権又は三百個（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その個数）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主に限り、当該請求をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (b) After covering and pressing lightly the upper skin of the laughing muscle, buccinator muscle, greater zygomatic muscle, and lesser zygomatic muscle with both hands when smiling, hold the face line raising it slightly with both hands and press the chin upwards at the bottom and finally press the neck lightly with both hands crossing each other.
    （ａ）笑顔を作った顔面の頬の膨らみに、両方の手のひらの窪みを密着させ、目を閉 じ、両方の手のひらを、ゆっくりした一定の速度で外回りの円を描くように動かす工 程、 （ｂ）笑顔を作った顔面の、笑筋、頬筋、大頬骨筋および小頬骨筋の上面皮膚を両方の 手のひらで包み軽く押さえた後、両手でフェイスラインを軽く引き上げるように押さ え、更に、額部分を下から上方向に押さえ、最後に首筋を、両手を交差させた状態で 軽く押さえる工程。 - 特許庁
  • Article 48 A member who has made a request under the provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article may convene the general meeting by obtaining the approval of an administrative organ, when no director has instigated the procedure for convening the general meeting within ten days from the day on which he/she has made the request under the same paragraph. The same shall apply when there is no person to perform the duties of a director and when the member has gained the consent of or more one-fifth of all partner (in the case where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of association, such proportion).
    第四十八条　前条第二項の規定による請求をした組合員は、同項の請求をした日から十日以内に理事が総会招集の手続をしないときは、行政庁の承認を得て総会を招集することができる。理事の職務を行う者がない場合において、組合員が総組合員の五分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあつては、その割合）以上の同意を得たときも同様である。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 297 (1) Shareholders having consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more) not less than three hundredths (3/100) (or, in cases where lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the votes of all shareholders may demand the directors, by showing the matters which shall be the purpose of the shareholders meeting (limited to the matters on which such shareholders may exercise their votes) and the reason of the calling, that they call the shareholders meeting.
    第二百九十七条　総株主の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主は、取締役に対し、株主総会の目的である事項（当該株主が議決権を行使することができる事項に限る。）及び招集の理由を示して、株主総会の招集を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (3) The provisions of Article 297, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the calling of an Investors' meeting. In this case, the phrase "not less than three-hundredths (3/100) (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the votes of all shareholders" in Article 297, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "not less than three-hundredths (3/100) (or, in cases where a smaller proportion is prescribed in the certificate of incorporation, such proportion) of the units of Issued Investment Equity," the term "the court" in paragraph (4) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.
    ３　会社法第二百九十七条第一項及び第四項の規定は、投資主総会の招集について準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「総株主の議決権」とあるのは「発行済投資口」と、「以上の議決権」とあるのは「以上の口数の投資口」と、同条第四項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Quantity of fuel sufficient to complete flight to destination, plus sufficient fuel to fly 45 minutes at cruising altitude (or in cases where there is no suitable alternate airport etc., plus sufficient fuel to complete flight to the destination, plus a sufficient quantity of fuel to fly for a period equivalent to 15% of the distance flown at cruising altitude to the destination, or plus sufficient fuel to fly 2 hours at cruising altitude, whichever is the lesser quantity).
    着陸地までの飛行を終わるまでに要する燃料の量に、巡航高度で四十五分間飛行することができる燃料の量を加えた量（代替空港等に適した空港等がない場合にあつては、当該着陸地までの飛行を終わるまでに要する燃料の量に、巡航高度で四十五分間飛行することができる燃料の量及び当該着陸地までの飛行における巡航高度を飛行する時間の十五パーセントに相当する時間を飛行することができる燃料の量又は巡航高度で二時間飛行することができる燃料の量のうちいずれか少ない燃料の量を加えた量） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • The barrier metal layer 4 comprises a first nickel layer 4a containing phosphorus and multiple layers including a second nickel layer 4b whose phosphorus content in nickel is lesser than that in the first nickel layer 4a, the first nickel layer 4a coats the peripheral part of the opening of the passivation layer 3, and the second nickel layer 4b coats the surface of the first nickel layer 4a.
    半導体基板１表面に形成された所定パターンの電極層２と、電極層２を被覆し、且つ該被覆領域に開口を有するパッシベーション層３と、前記開口から露出した電極層２上に形成されるバリアメタル層４とを備えた半導体素子であって、バリアメタル層４は、リンを含有する第１のニッケル層４ａと、第１のニッケル層４ａよりもニッケル中のリンの含有量が少ない第２のニッケル層４ｂとを含む多層から構成されるとともに、第１のニッケル層４ａは、パッシベーション層３の開口の周縁を被覆しており、第２のニッケル層４ｂは、第１のニッケル層４ａ表面を被覆している。 - 特許庁
  • Article 8.1 stipulates that it would be advisable that the price increase shall be lower than the margin of dumping if such increase is adequate to remove the injury to the domestic industry. This concept is analogous to the “lesser duty rule” of Article 9.1 of the Antidumping Agreement, but applicable, exclusively, to price undertakings. As the objective of such a measure should be limited to eliminating the injurious effect of the dumping, wouldn’t it be inappropriate to have a level of price undertaking that implies a price increase higher than necessary to remove the injury?
    ＡＤ協定第８．１条において、価格約束に基づく価格の引き上げに際して、ダンピングマージンに相当する額よりも少ない額の価格の引き上げが国内産業に対する損害を除去するために十分である場合には、当該価格の引き上げの額は、その少ない額であることが望ましいとされている。これは、ＡＤ協定第９．１条の"レッサー・デューティー・ルール"と類似のコンセプトであるが、価格約束を対象としたものである。ＡＤ措置の目的は、ダンピングによる損害の影響を除去するに限定されるべきであり、損害を除去するために必要な額を超えた価格の引き上げを伴う価格約束は不適切であることを問題として提起。 - 経済産業省
  • (2) The General Partner may borrow money or provide the Partnership Assets as collateral on behalf of the Partnership for the purpose of payment for Portfolio Investments or the expenses of the Partnership, or guarantee liabilities or provide the Partnership Assets as collateral on behalf of the Partnership where a Portfolio Company or an entity in which it invests receives a loan in connection with a Portfolio Investment; provided, however, that the total amount of (i) the Partnership’s borrowings and (ii) the obligations guaranteed by the Partnership and the obligations secured by the Partnership Assets for the Portfolio Companies or entities in which they invest shall not exceed the lesser of (x) [__]% of the total Capital Commitments of all Partners or (y) the aggregate Unpaid Capital Commitments of the Partners.
    2. 無限責任組合員は、ポートフォリオ投資又は本組合の費用の支払いのために本組合による金銭の借入れ及び組合財産の担保提供を行うこと、並びに、ポートフォリオ投資に関連して投資先事業者等又はその投資先が金銭の借入れを行う場合の本組合による債務の保証及び組合財産の担保提供を行うことができる。但し、本組合による借入れに係る債務、並びに、投資先事業者等又はその投資先のための債務の保証及び物上保証に係る被担保債務の合計額は、総組合員の出資約束金額の合計額の［ ］%を上限とし、かつ、組合員の出資未履行金額nの合計額を超えない範囲で行われるものとする。 - 経済産業省
  • Article 38 (1) Members having consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three thousandths (or in cases where lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the total membership, or three thousand (or in cases where smaller number is prescribed in the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in mutual Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Providers specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Mutual Company"), members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order), who have been members of the Mutual Company, may demand the directors by showing the matters which shall be the purpose of the shareholders meeting (limited to matters on which the general meeting of members may adopt a resolution; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Division) and the reason of the calling, that they call the shareholders meeting.
    第三十八条　社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（少額短期保険業者である相互会社のうち政令で定めるもの（以下「特定相互会社」という。）にあっては、政令で定める数以上の社員）で六月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者は、取締役に対し、社員総会の目的である事項（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項に限る。以下この目において同じ。）及び招集の理由を示して、社員総会の招集を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 39 (1) Members having consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period) no less than one thousandth (or in cases where lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the total membership, or one thousand (or in case where smaller number is prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number prescribed by a Cabinet Order), who have been members of the Mutual Company, may demand the directors to include certain items (limited to matters on which the general meeting of members may adopt a resolution) in the agenda for the general meeting of members. In this case, the demand shall be submitted no later than eight weeks (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) prior to the date of the general meeting of members.
    第三十九条　社員総数の千分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、政令で定める数以上の社員）で六月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者は、取締役に対し、一定の事項（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項に限る。）を社員総会の目的とすることを請求することができる。この場合において、その請求は、社員総会の日の八週間（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前までにしなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • (5) [If an Excuse/Exclusion clause is not included]If, as of the date of distribution under the liquidation procedures of the Partnership pursuant to Article 47, the General Partner has received an incentive fee and (i) the cumulative amount of the Partnership Assets that has been distributed to the Interested Partners pursuant to Article 29 or Article 47 (in the case of in kind distributions, including the Value at the Time of Distribution thereof; in this Article, the same applies) (the “Cumulative Distributed Amount”) is less than the sum of (a) the total Capital Contributions made by the Interested Partners and (b) an amount equal to [O]% thereof (such sum is hereinafter referred to as the “Preferred Distribution Amount”) or (ii) the total incentive fees received by the General Partner (the “Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount”) exceeds [Q]% of the sum of (A) the Cumulative Distributed Amount after thededuction of the total Capital Contributions made by the Interested Partners and (B) the Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount, the General Partner shall promptly return to the Partnership the amount equal to the lesser of (x) the larger of the amounts set forth in the items below or (y) the Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount. Upon payment to the Partnership, such refund (the “Clawback Amount”) shall be allocated to each Interested Partner in proportion to its Interest Amount (for a Withdrawing Partner, the Interest Amount at the time of withdrawal).
    5. 【免除/除外条項を設けない場合】第47 条に基づく本組合の清算手続における分配を行う日の時点において、無限責任組合員が成功報酬を受領している場合で、かつ、(ⅰ)第29 条又は第47条に基づき組合員等に対して行われた組合財産の分配額（現物分配の場合にはその分配時評価額を含む。以下本条において同じ。）の累計額（以下「対象分配累計額」という。）が、組合員等によりなされた出資履行金額の総額及び同金額の［α］%に相当する金額の合計額（以下「優先分配金額」という。）を下回るか、又は(ⅱ)無限責任組合員が受領した成功報酬の合計額（以下「対象成功報酬累計額」という。）が、対象分配累計額から組合員等の出資履行金額の合計額を控除した金額及び対象成功報酬累計額の合計額の［β］%を超える場合、無限責任組合員は、(x)以下の各号に定める金額のうちいずれか大きい金額又は(y)対象成功報酬累計額の金額のうち、いずれか小さい金額に相当する額を、本組合に速やかに返還するものとする。かかる返還金（以下「クローバック金額」という。）は、本組合への支払いをもって、各組合員等へその持分金額（脱退組合員については脱退当時の持分金額）に応じ按分の上帰属する。 - 経済産業省
  • On the other hand, experts have pointed out various issues pertaining to the EU-ETS, including the following. ① Regarding the reduction targets of Phase I, there are problems in cap setting, such as moderate emissions allowances that lead to a price fall when the moderate allocation is realized. ② There are problems related to fairness and equity with respect to the cap. For example, during Phase I, in the process of creating national allocation plans that determine each country’s emissions cap, there were about 800 cases26 in all the EU countries wherein the companies sued their national governments over allocation methods and allocation amounts. Further, during Phase II, the former East European countries, such as Czech Republic, Latvia, Poland, Hungary, and Estonia, sued the European Commission over its strict demand on the allocation amount27. ③ There are concerns about “carbon leakage” and a loss of international competitiveness among the EU companies. For example, Jean-Louis Borloo, the French Minister of Ecology and Sustainable Development, expressed his concern about “carbon leakage,” which occurs when economic activities and plant locations move from the EU countries to countries with lesser or no environmental regulations. Secretary General Mr. Richmann of German Federation of Industry and Energy stated that in a situation wherein the competitors do not need to bear carbon costs, domestic industries cannot pass on the carbon costs to the international market. This would lead to not only loss of the labor market but also migration of the manufacturing bases, resulting in increased emissions outside of Europe.
    一方、EU-ETSに対しては、①第一約束期間の削減目標については、排出枠の設定が緩く、割当の緩さが判明した時点で価格が暴落するなど、キャップの設定に課題があったこと、②各国の排出上限量となる国別割当計画の策定過程において、割当方法及び割当量をめぐって、第一約束期間においては、企業が各国政府を提訴した事例がEU全体で800件程度あり、第二約束期間については、チェコ、ラトビア、ポーランド、ハンガリー、エストニア等旧東欧諸国が欧州委員会の要求する厳しい割当量を巡り、欧州委員会を相手に訴訟を起こしているなど、キャップの衡平性に課題があること、③フランスのボルローエコロジー・持続可能な開発整備相が、「EU域内から環境規制が緩いまたは無い他の地域に工場など移転する、いわゆる『炭素リーケージ』について懸念がある。」と表明し、ドイツの産業エネルギー連盟リヒマン事務総長が、「競争相手に炭素コストが生じなければ、産業界はこのコストを世界市場で転嫁できないので、労働市場が失われるだけではなく、生産拠点の移転もあり得るが、これは、欧州外での排出増加になる。」と発言しているなど、炭素リーケージ及び域内企業の国際競争力低下の懸念があること、等、様々な課題が指摘されている。 - 経済産業省
  • If, as of the date of distribution under the liquidation procedures of the Partnership pursuant to Article 47, the General Partner has received an incentive fee for a Portfolio Investment to which each Interested Partner has made contributions and (i) the cumulative amount of the Partnership Assets distributed to such Interested Partner pursuant to Article 29 or Article 47 (in the case of distribution in kind, including the Value at the Time of Distribution thereof; in this Agreement, the same applies) (the “Cumulative Distributed Amount”) is less than the sum of (a) the total Capital Contributions made by such Interested Partner and (b) an amount equal to [O]% thereof (such sum is hereinafter referred to as the “Preferred Distribution Amount”) or (ii) with respect to an incentive fee received by the General Partner in respect of each Portfolio Investment to which each Interested Partner made contribution, the total of the shares of such Interested Partner of such incentive fee in proportion to its Percentage Interest (the “Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount”) exceeds [Q]% of the sum of (A) the Cumulative Distributed Amount of such Interested Partner after the deduction of the total Capital Contributions made by such Interested Partner and (B) the Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount, the General Partner shall promptly return to the Partnership the amount equal to the lesser of (x) the larger of the amounts set forth in the items below or (y) the Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount. Upon payment to the Partnership, such refund (the “Clawback Amount”) shall be allocated to the Interest Amount of such Interested Partner.
    第47 条に基づく本組合の清算手続における分配を行う日の時点において、各組合員等に関し、当該組合員等が出資を行うポートフォリオ投資において無限責任組合員が成功報酬を受領している場合で、かつ、(ⅰ)第29 条又は第47 条に基づき当該組合員等に対して行われた組合財産の分配額（現物分配の場合にはその分配時評価額を含む。以下本条において同じ。）の累計額（以下「対象分配累計額」という。）が、当該組合員等によりなされた出資履行金額の総額及び同金額の［α］%に相当する金額の合計額（以下「優先分配金額」という。）を下回るか、又は(ⅱ)当該組合員等が出資を行う各ポートフォリオ投資に関し無限責任組合員が受領した各成功報酬のそれぞれの金額のうち、対応する各ポートフォリオ投資に出資をする当該各組合員等の対象持分割合に相当する金額の合計額（以下「対象成功報酬累計額」という。）が、当該組合員等に係る対象分配累計額から当該組合員等の出資履行金額を控除した金額及び対象成功報酬累計額の合計額の［β］%を超える場合、無限責任組合員は、(x)以下の各号に定める金額のうちいずれか大きい金額又は(y)対象成功報酬累計額の金額のうち、いずれか小さい金額に相当する額を、本組合に速やかに返還するものとする。かかる返還金（以下「クローバック金額」という。）は、本組合への支払いをもって、当該組合員等の持分金額に帰属する。 - 経済産業省
  • Article 53-36 The provisions of Article 425 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii), the second sentence of paragraphs (4) and (5)) (Partial Exemption from Liability), Article 426 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Provisions of Articles of Incorporation on Exemption by Directors), Article 427 (Contracts for Limitation of Liability), Article 428 (Special Provision on Transactions Carried Out by Director for Himself/Herself) and Article 430 (Joint and Several Liabilities of Officers, etc.) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability for damages of the Officers, etc. of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Article 423, paragraph (1)" and "Article 424" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-33, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act" and "Article 53-34 of the Insurance Business Act," respectively; the term "resolution" in Article 425, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the resolution set forth in Article 62, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "the consent of directors with respect to exemption from liability under the provisions of the articles of incorporation pursuant to the provisions of that paragraph (limited to exemption from liability of directors (excluding those who are Audit Committee Members) and executive officers) is to be obtained, and to the cases where a proposal regarding such exemption from liability" in Article 426, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a proposal regarding the exemption of liability pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under that paragraph (limited to the exemption from liability of directors (excluding those who are Audit Committee Members) and executive officers)"; the term "shareholders having not less than three hundredths (or, in cases where lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the votes of all shareholders (excluding Officers, etc. subject to the liability referred to in paragraph (3))" in Article 426, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership (excluding the number of members who are Officers, etc. subject to the liability referred to in paragraph (3)) of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act)"; and the term "Article 425, paragraphs (4) and (5)" in Article 427, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the first sentence of Article 425, paragraph (4)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.
    第五十三条の三十六　会社法第四百二十五条（第一項第二号、第四項後段及び第五項を除く。）（責任の一部免除）、第四百二十六条（第四項を除く。）（取締役等による免除に関する定款の定め）、第四百二十七条（責任限定契約）、第四百二十八条（取締役が自己のためにした取引に関する特則）及び第四百三十条（役員等の連帯責任）の規定は、相互会社の役員等の損害賠償責任について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「第四百二十三条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十三第一項」と、「第四百二十四条」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十四」と、同法第四百二十五条第一項中「決議」とあるのは「保険業法第六十二条第二項に規定する決議」と、同法第四百二十六条第二項中「についての取締役の同意を得る場合及び当該責任の免除に関する」とあるのは「に関する」と、同条第五項中「総株主（第三項の責任を負う役員等であるものを除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数（第三項の責任を負う役員等である社員の数を除く。）の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）」と、同法第四百二十七条第五項中「第四百二十五条第四項及び第五項」とあるのは「第四百二十五条第四項前段」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 94 (1) The provisions of the main clause of Article 300, Article 303, paragraph (2), Article 304, the main clause of Article 305, paragraph (1), Article 305, paragraph (4), Article 306 (excluding paragraph (2) and paragraph (4)), Article 307, Article 308 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)), Article 310, and Article 313 through Article 318 (excluding paragraph (3)) inclusive of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an Investors' meeting. In this case, the term "the preceding Article" in the main clause of Article 300 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, at a Company with a Board of Directors" in Article 303, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act shall be deleted, the phrase "the votes of all shareholders" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Issued Investment Equity," the phrase "or not less than three hundred (or, in cases where lesser number is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such number of) votes of all shareholder" in that paragraph shall be deleted, the phrase "only shareholders" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Investors," the term "Shareholders" in the main clause of Article 305, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Investors who continually held not less than one-hundredth (in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such proportion) of the units of Issued Investment Equity for the preceding six months or more (in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such period)," the phrase "shareholders be notified of" in that paragraph shall be deleted, the phrase "(or, in cases where a notice pursuant to paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of Article 299 is to be given, such summary be specified or recorded in that notice)" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be stated or recorded in the notice under Article 91, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrases "who hold" and "the votes of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved in the shareholders meeting)" in Article 306, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "who continually held" and "the Issued Investment Equity for the preceding six months or more (in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such period)" respectively, the term "the court" in Article 306, paragraph (1), paragraph (3), paragraph (5), and paragraph (6), Article 307, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), and Article 318, paragraph (5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the term "Article 299(3)" in Article 310, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 297, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 90, paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 298 and Article 299" in Article 317 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1) and Article 91, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance.
    第九十四条　会社法第三百条本文、第三百三条第二項、第三百四条、第三百五条第一項本文及び第四項、第三百六条（第二項及び第四項を除く。）、第三百七条、第三百八条（第一項ただし書を除く。）、第三百十条並びに第三百十三条から第三百十八条（第三項を除く。）までの規定は、投資主総会について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百条本文中「前条」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十一条第一項から第三項まで」と、同法第三百三条第二項中「前項の規定にかかわらず、取締役会設置会社においては、総株主の議決権」とあるのは「発行済投資口」と、「議決権又は三百個（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その個数）以上の議決権」とあるのは「口数の投資口」と、「株主に限り」とあるのは「投資主は」と、同法第三百五条第一項本文中「株主は」とあるのは「発行済投資口の百分の一（これを下回る割合を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の投資口を六箇月（これを下回る期間を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する投資主は」と、「株主に通知すること（第二百九十九条第二項又は第三項の通知をする場合にあっては、その通知に記載し、又は記録すること）」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十一条第一項又は第二項の通知に記載し、又は記録すること」と、同法第三百六条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権」とあるのは「発行済投資口」と、「議決権を有する」とあるのは「口数の投資口を六箇月（これを下回る期間を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する」と、同条第一項、第三項、第五項及び第六項並びに同法第三百七条第一項及び第二項並びに第三百十八条第五項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同法第三百十条第四項中「第二百九十九条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十一条第二項」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十条第三項において準用する第二百九十七条第一項及び第四項」と、同法第三百十七条中「第二百九十八条及び第二百九十九条」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十条の二第一項及び第九十一条第一項から第三項まで」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
  • Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.
    第五十三条の十五　会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
＜前へ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

例文データの著作権について