「On-Course」を含む例文一覧(2009)
＜前へ 1 2 .... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41- The registration of a trade mark may be revoked on any of the following grounds: that, up to the date 1 month before the date of the application for the revocation of the registration of the trade mark, a continuous period of 3 years or more elapsed following the actual date of registration during which the trade mark was not put to genuine use in the course of trade in New Zealand, by any owner for the time being, in relation to the goods or services in respect of which it is registered: except as provided in subsection (3), that the use of the trade mark has been suspended for an uninterrupted period of 3 years: that, in consequence of acts or inactivity of the owner, the trade mark has become a common name in general public use for a product or service in respect of which it is registered: that the article or substance was formerly manufactured under a patent or the service was formerly a patented process; and a period of 2 years or more has elapsed since the expiry of the patent; and the word is or the words are the only practicable name or description of the article, substance, or service: that, in consequence of the trade mark's use by the owner or with the owner's consent in relation to the goods or services in respect of which the trade mark is registered, the trade mark is likely to deceive or confuse the public, for instance as to the nature, quality, or geographical origin of those goods or services.
商標登録は，次に掲げる理由の何れかを基にして取り消すことができる。商標登録に係る取消申請日の1月前までに，商標がそのときの所有者によりその登録に係る商品又はサービスについてニュージーランドにおいて業として真正の使用がされなかった期間が，実際の登録日後，連続して3年以上経過していること(3)に定める場合を除き，商標の使用が中断なく3年間停止していること所有者の行為又は無為の結果，商標がその登録に係る商品又はサービスについて一般公衆に使用される普通名称になっていること 次に掲げる事情があること，すなわち，それに係る物品若しくは物質が以前は特許に基づいて製造されていたか，又はそれに係るサービスが以前は特許方法であったこと，及び特許の満了から2年以上の期間が経過していること，及びそれに係る文言が物品，物質又はサービスについての単なる実用的な名称又は説明であること商標登録に係る商品又はサービスについての所有者による又は所有者の同意を得た商標の使用の結果，商標が例えば，その商品又はサービスの性質，品質又は原産地等に関して公衆に誤認又は混同を生じさせる虞があること - 特許庁 - Article 138 With regard to any Policyholders Protection Fund as defined in Article 259, paragraph (2) of the Former Insurance Business Act in existence at the time when this Act enters into force (including a fund in the course of liquidation; referred to as "Policyholders Protection Fund" in the following Article to Article 141 inclusive of the Supplementary Provisions) that includes among its business participants (referring to the business participants prescribed in Article 260, paragraph (5), item (iv) of the Former Insurance Business Act), at the time when this Act enters into force, any Insurance Company to which the provision of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article shall apply but for which no decision has been made to provide Financial Assistance (referring to the Financial Assistance prescribed in Article 260, paragraph (5), item (v) of the Former Insurance Business Act), the provisions of Article 259 to 270 inclusive of the Former Insurance Business Act and Article 105 of the Supplementary Provisions to the Former Insurance Business Act shall remain in force even after this Act enters into force, for a period to be specified by a Cabinet Order counting from the Effective Date. In this case, the term "Article 241" in Article 268, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Former Insurance Business Act, which shall remain in force, shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 241 of the Insurance Business Act prior to the revision by the provision of Article 22 of the Act on Revision, etc. of Related Acts for the Financial System Reform (Act No. 107 of 1998)."
第百三十八条 この法律の施行の際現に存する旧保険業法第二百五十九条第二項に規定する保険契約者保護基金（清算中のものを含む。次条から附則第百四十一条までにおいて「保険契約者保護基金」という。）であって、この法律の施行の際現にその事業参加者（旧保険業法第二百六十条第五項第四号に規定する事業参加者をいう。）の中にその資金援助（旧保険業法第二百六十条第五項第五号に規定する資金援助をいう。）を行うことを決定していない前条第一項の規定の適用を受ける保険会社があるものについては、旧保険業法第二百五十九条から第二百七十条まで及び旧保険業法附則第百五条の規定は、この法律の施行後も、施行日から起算して政令で定める期間を経過する日までの間、なおその効力を有する。この場合において、なおその効力を有するものとされる旧保険業法第二百六十八条第一項第一号中「第二百四十一条」とあるのは、「金融システム改革のための関係法律の整備等に関する法律（平成十年法律第百七号）第二十二条の規定による改正前の保険業法第二百四十一条」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - We have already entered the home stretch in the study, and at today's cabinet meeting, the cabinet members were instructed to select truly priority items (bills), as the period of the upcoming extraordinary Diet session is short, and we have already notified the Cabinet Secretariat of our bill with its tentative name. What we can do to support SMEs within the authority of the FSA is limited, and as I have been saying, it is necessary to envision the prospect of the overall economy and set the broad course of government policy for economic growth, and the moratorium scheme alone would not provide a hopeful prospect for SMEs; it is also necessary to take concrete measures to increase the jobs and revenues of SMEs and small shops. Therefore, it is very important to implement measures other than those that can be taken within the small areas of the FSA's administrative jurisdiction. As basic polices are to be decided by the Basic Policy Cabinet Committee, which is comprised of the Prime Minister, Minister Fukushima and I, I am in a position to be involved in implementing measures outside the FSA's narrow areas of administrative jurisdiction as cabinet policy. While I do my best in this respect, I will ensure the drafting of a bill that can stand against your criticism as a measure to support SMEs within my area of jurisdiction, as we still have more time till we submit the bill. Senior Vice Minister Otsuka's working group has entered the home stretch in its study on the bill, and it will fix the details based on opinions collected from various sectors.
もう第4コーナーを回ってホームストレッチに入りましたから、今も閣議で、今度の臨時国会は期間が短いので、その中で各省庁と重点的なものを整理して出してくれという話がありまして、うちは既に（内閣）官房のほうに、「（仮称）」を付けて（法案名を）提出しておりますが、これも中小・零細企業対策として、金融庁の権限の中でやれることは限られるわけですけれども、これは前から言っているように、もう経済全体の展開をきっちりと構成していく、経済成長に向かっていくという大きなかじ取りがなければならないし、具体的にそうした中小・零細企業、商店等の仕事なり、売上げが増えるための具体的な施策がなされていかなければ、返済を猶予するというようなことだけで、中小・零細企業が「よし頑張るぞ」という気分になるはずはありませんから、そういう狭い金融庁の行政の範囲外の施策、これが極めて大事なことでして、我々としては、私の場合は、総理、私、福島大臣の閣僚の基本委員会、そこで基本的な政策等は決めていくという形にもなっているわけですから、そういう意味では、金融庁の狭い守備範囲だけではなくて、今言ったようなことも、私としては内閣の方針としてそれをやっていくことに関与できる立場におりますから、そういう面も、今後、全力を挙げてやっていきながら、私の守備範囲の中での中小・零細企業対策として、必ず、今、ホームストレッチに入っていますけれども、ちゃんとした法案が仕上げられると思いますから、あと、大塚副大臣のところで、最後の詰めを、今からいろいろな各界から話を更に聞きながら、まだ提出まで時間がありますから、皆さん方の批判にも耐えられるようなちゃんとしたものに仕上げてまいります - 金融庁 - Article 56 (1) The provisions of Articles 131(1), 131-2(1), 132 to 133-2, 134(1), 134(3), 134(4), 135 to 154, 155(1), 155(2), 156 to 158, 160(1), 160(2), 161, and 167 to 170 (effect of trial decision, request for trial, trial examiner, trial procedures in relation to litigation, and costs of trial) of the Patent Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a trial. In this case, the term "is made with respect to the grounds for the request as provided in item (iii) of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article in the course of filing a request for a trial other than a trial for Patent invalidation, or in the event that approval is granted by the chief trial examiner under the following paragraph" in Article131-2(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "is made with respect to the grounds for the request as provided in Article 131(1)(iii) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 56(1) of this Act in the course of filing a request for a trial other than a trial under Article 46(1) of the Trademark Act," the term "a trial for Patent invalidation and a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of term" in Articles 132(1) and 167 of the Patent Act and the term "a trial for Patent invalidation or a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of term" in Articles 145(1) and 169(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 46(1), 50(1), 51(1), 52-2(1), 53(1) or 53-2 of the Trademark Act," the term "a party in the case or an intervener in the case" in Article 139(i), (ii) and (v) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a party in the case, an intervener in the case or an opponent to the registration in the case", the term "a party in the case or an intervener in the case" in Article 139(iii) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a party in the case, an intervener in the case or an opponent to the registration in the case," the term "a trial against the examiner's decision of refusal" in Article 161 of the Patent Act and "a trial against an examiner's decision of refusal and a trial for correction" in Article 169(3) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 44(1) or 45(1) of the Trademark Act," and the term "the decision in another trial" in Article 168(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a decision on the opposition to registration or a trial decision in another trial."
第五十六条 特許法第百三十一条第一項、第百三十一条の二第一項、第百三十二条から第百三十三条の二まで、第百三十四条第一項、第三項及び第四項、第百三十五条から第百五十四条まで、第百五十五条第一項及び第二項、第百五十六条から第百五十八条まで、第百六十条第一項及び第二項、第百六十一条並びに第百六十七条から第百七十条まで（審決の効果、審判の請求、審判官、審判の手続、訴訟との関係及び審判における費用）の規定は、審判に準用する。この場合において、同法第百三十一条の二第一項中「特許無効審判以外の審判を請求する場合における同項第三号に掲げる請求の理由についてされるとき、又は次項の規定による審判長の許可があつたとき」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項の審判以外の審判を請求する場合における同法第五十六条第一項において準用する特許法第百三十一条第一項第三号に掲げる請求の理由についてされるとき」と、同法第百三十二条第一項及び第百六十七条中「特許無効審判又は延長登録無効審判」とあり、並びに同法第百四十五条第一項及び第百六十九条第一項中「特許無効審判及び延長登録無効審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項、第五十条第一項、第五十一条第一項、第五十二条の二第一項、第五十三条第一項又は第五十三条の二の審判」と、同法第百三十九条第一号、第二号及び第五号中「当事者若しくは参加人」とあるのは「当事者、参加人若しくは登録異議申立人」と、同条第三号中「当事者又は参加人」とあるのは「当事者、参加人又は登録異議申立人」と、同法第百六十一条中「拒絶査定不服審判」とあり、及び同法第百六十九条第三項中「拒絶査定不服審判及び訂正審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十四条第一項又は第四十五条第一項の審判」と、同法第百六十八条第一項中「他の審判の審決」とあるのは「登録異議の申立てについての決定若しくは他の審判の審決」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - I take it that you are asking about the proposed amendment to the Insurance Business Act that has been passed to the current session for continued deliberation. I assume that you are questioning the appropriateness of a mutual aid business of a public interest corporation or the arrangement in which a mutual aid business of a given public interest corporation is to be supervised by the former competent authorities, with an implication that the FSA should be responsible for supervision. Well, the fact is that the respective authorities, having the experience of supervising public interest corporations for a long time, are well-versed with specifics of their operation. On the subject of this Act, I believe that I named several examples the other day, such as the Japan Medical Association, which has always been supervised by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare since the Meiji era, including the years of supervision by its predecessor, the Health and Medical Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. While circumstances vary from authority to authority, they know very extensively about internal affairs of those corporations and have exercised thorough supervision and, in that sense, have a set of knowledge of their operation and other information accumulated in the course of the work of supervision in the past, which accordingly makes them presumably capable of delivering more fine-tuned supervision than the FSA would be. Since the most important thing is policyholder protection, we believe that, from such a perspective, having the former authorities supervise them is an appropriate way to go. It is also in comprehensive consideration of overall circumstances, including the fact that this exemption of the Act is a provisional step, that we find it appropriate to have the former authorities continue to supervise those corporations.
継続審議となっている保険業法の改正案のことだと思いますけれども、公益法人の共済事業あるいは旧主務官庁が監督することになっていますが、それはいかがなものかと、金融庁として監督すべきではないかという質問かと思いますけれども、公益法人というのは、それぞれの官庁が長い間、公益法人の監督をしてきたわけでございますから、その業務に関しては、各監督官庁が事情をよく知っており、この法律については、幾つかこの前も申し上げたと思いますが、例えば、日本医師会は確か明治以来、厚生省、当時の内務省衛生局が、ずっと監督官庁でございまして、各省色々ありますけれども、内部のことを非常によく知っており、各主務官庁がきめ細かい監督を行っていますから、そういった意味で、その業務に関する知見やこれまでの監督について蓄積している情報がございますので、金融庁に比べてより細かな監督を行うことができると考えられまして、契約者保護ということが一番大事ではございますが、そういった観点から（旧主務官庁が監督することが）適当というふうに考えております。そして、この法律の特例は当分の間という措置でございますので、そういったことを総合的に勘案して、引き続き旧主務官庁が監督することが適切だと考えております。 - 金融庁 - Our teacher dedicated his life to the study requiring great pains; as to "Koshi-den", at the end of the Bunka era (1804-1818), he began to write the draft, and by the early Bunsei era (1818-1830), about 12 volumes had been completed; however, by that time, he had also gradually gained an insight into the study and understood the teachings of the master of Suzunoya (Norinaga MOTOORI), then he realized that this world was the product of our great gods of Japan, so he decided to suspend "Koshi-den" temporarily, and first explore and read through all the past annotations of the histories of our country as well as those of India and Europe to use new knowledge to his advantage in writing "Koshi-den"; therefore, since the middle of the Bunsei era, he intensly studied foreign literature and culture mainly, and during a period of over 20 years, he completed almost all his works, which he left for us, including "Sekiken Taiko-den" (Japanese Early History); although he was never satisfied with his works, his students, of course, including myself, with a feeling of gratitude, thought that our master had succeeded in completing most his researches and studies, and were concerned about the delay in completing "Koshi-den" and because of our master's age, we repeatedly begged him to restart the writing, then thankfully at about the 10th year of the Tenpo era (1839), he restarted; however, he was requested to write on linguistic methods so he began to write "Goju Ongi" (Pronunciation and Meaning of 50 Kana) and suspended "Koshi-den" again; after a year, he was banished to Akita Province by order of the former bakufu (Japanese feudal government headed by a shogun), fortunately since Akita was his hometown and there were many relatives of his, besides the former load treated him very kindly, they relieved him off poor living, although under those conditions, he had no time to finish the remaining works; he was always concerned about those unfinished works, and after only a few years, he became sick and regrettably died.
生涯苦心致され候中にも、古史伝は最初文化の末頃より草稿取り掛かり、文政の始め頃に、成文一二巻程は、ざっと稿本成り候ところ、段々見識博くあいなり、殊に故鈴屋大人の御遺教をも相伺れ候て、いよいよ以って、世界悉く我が皇大神達の御鎔造（ツクリカタメ）なされたる事を感得致され候に付、古史伝は先ず差し置き、赤縣州を始め、印度及び西洋の古伝をも悉く皆探索網羅して、其の上にて、充分に古史の註解をと存し込まれ候て、文政の半ば頃より、専ら外国の学に困苦致され、凡そ廿余年も歳月を過ごされ候て、赤縣太古傳を初め、即ち今此れある丈の著述は出来候へ共、中々もって先人の心底に叶ひ候事には此れ無く候へ共、大抵は見当も付き候に依っては、私を始め門人の中の所存にも、段々時節後れ、先人も老年に成られ候に付き、先ず先ず外国の所は大抵にして差し置かれ、古史伝の清撰をしきりて、相願い催促致し候て、天保10年頃より、漸々と其の方にも趣かれ候所、言語規則の書之無きに付き、余儀なく五十音義の撰にかかり、凡そ一ヵ年ほど打ち過ぎられ候所、旧幕府の命に依って秋田へ放逐、尤も同所は本国の事、親族共も少なからず、第一旧君侯より厚く恩遇も之有りて会計の辛苦は薄らぎ候へ共、著述致す可き遑なく、此処両三年心配致され候内に病を発し入幽致され候次第にて残念至極にて御座候。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス - In the course of examination the Patent Office shall: refuse to recognize the subject matter of the application as an invention, in particular where the Office reveals that it does not concern any tangible creation susceptible of application, determined by means of technical features relating to its structure or composition, nor any particular technical way in which it affects a material, nor new use of a substance comprised in the state of the art; (ii)refuse to recognize the subject matter of the application as a new invention, where it may prove that all the technical features of the technical solution or of a variation of the technical solution contained in the application, taken together, are comprised in the state of the art and are not characterized by the production of unexpected effects; recognize the claimed invention that meets the criterion of novelty as a technical solution not involving an inventive step, where the Office may cite those documents from the state of the art, on the basis of which it may reasonably claim that the invention's capability of being carried out or applied is clearly implied by that state of the art, when taking into account average skills of a person skilled in the art; refuse to recognize the subject matter of the application as a technical solution susceptible of industrial application, in particular when it finds that it is infeasible for that solution to be used for manufacturing of the product or for the claimed process to be used in a technical sense.
特許庁は，審査の過程において次のことを行う。 特に出願の主題が，構造又は構成に関する技術的特徴から判断して，出願可能な実体的な創造物に関係しておらず，また物質に作用する特定の技術的方法にも，技術水準に含まれる物質の新たな用途にも関係していないことを庁が明らかにした場合は，発明としての出願の主題の認容を拒絶する。出願に含まれる，技術的解決方法又はその変種の技術的特徴のすべてが，全体として技術水準に含まれており，かつ，予期できない効果の出現によって特徴付けられていないことを特許庁が証明することができる場合は，出願の主題を新たな発明として認容することを拒絶する。特許庁が技術水準から書類を引用することができ，その書類を基礎として特許庁が，当該技術の熟練者の平均的熟練度を考慮に入れたときに，発明が実施され又は利用される可能性が当該技術水準に明瞭に示されていることを合理的に主張することができる場合は，新規性の基準に適合するクレームされた発明を，進歩性を含まない技術的解決方法として認容する。 特に，製品の製造のために当該解決方法が実施されること又はクレームされた方法が技術的な意味で実施されることが不可能であることを特許庁が認めたときは，出願の主題を産業上の利用可能性のある技術的解決方法として認容することを拒絶する。 - 特許庁 - Article 21 A person upon whom the assistance punishment prescribed in Article 16, paragraph (1), item (i) is to be enforced shall be regarded as a person upon whom imprisonment with work is to be enforced; a person upon whom the assistance punishment prescribed in item (ii) of the same paragraph is to be enforced shall be regarded as a person upon whom imprisonment without work is to be enforced; the assistance punishment prescribed in item (i) of the same paragraph shall be regarded as imprisonment with work; the assistance punishment in item (ii) of the same paragraph shall be regarded as imprisonment without work; and the following provisions shall apply for the purpose of enforcing the assistance punishment: Article 22, Article 24, Article 28, Article 29, Articles 31 to 33 and Article 34, paragraph (1) of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), Article 474, Articles 480 to 482, Articles 484 to 489, Articles 502 to 504 and Article 507 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 2, paragraph (1), Article 27, paragraph (1), Article 56, Article 57 and Article 61 of the Juvenile Act (Act No. 168 of 1948), Article 1, Article 2, Articles 4 to 9, Article 10, paragraph (1), Article 10-2, Article 13, Article 14, paragraphs (1), (4) and (5), Articles 14-2 to 16, Article 17, paragraph (2), Article 17-2 and Article 17-4 to Article 17-6 of the Juvenile Training Schools Act (Act No. 169 of 1948) and Article 3, Article 4, paragraph (2), Articles 11 to 14, Article 16, Articles 23 to 30, Article 33, Article 34, paragraph (1), Articles 35 to 40, Article 48, Article 49, paragraph (1), Article 50, Article 51, Article 52, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 53, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 54, paragraph (2), Articles 55 to 58, Articles 60 to 65, Articles 75 to 77, Article 82, Articles 84 to 88 and Articles 91 to 98 of the Offenders Rehabilitation Act (Act No. 88 of 2007). In such a case, the "one-third" in Article 28 of the Penal Code shall be, "one-third (including the number of days an incoming sentenced person has been detained in the enforcement of the foreign punishment as defined in Article 2, item (i) of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "foreign punishment"), rendered in the final and binding decision with regard to the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer as defined in Article 2, item (xi) of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer") in a sentencing state as defined in Article 2, item (vii) of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "sentencing state"))"; "10 years" shall be "10 years (including the number of days an incoming sentenced person has been detained in the enforcement of the foreign punishment rendered in the final and binding decision with regard to the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer in the sentencing state)"; "after a sentence has become final and binding" in Article 32 of the same code shall be "after the surrender by a sentencing state in accordance with the order prescribed in Article 13 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons"; "two or more" and "the greatest among the punishments" in Article 474 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall be "assistance punishment as defined in Article 2, item (ii) of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "assistance punishment")"; "the other punishment" in the same Article shall be "the principal punishment"; "the public prosecutors office responding to the court that has rendered the punishment" in Article 480 and Article 482 of the same code shall be "the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office"; "category of punishment" in Article 487 of the same code shall be "types of assistance punishment"; "a person upon whom a decision is to be enforced" in Article 502 in the same code shall be "a person upon whom the assistance punishment is to be enforced"; "the court that rendered such decision" in the same Article shall be "the Tokyo District Court"; and "a judgment of guilty has become final and binding against an individual in the course of enforcement of a protective measure" in Article 27, paragraph (1) of the Juvenile Act and "a sentence of imprisonment with or without work, or of penal detention has become final and binding in the course of enforcement of a protective measure" in Article 57 in the same code shall be "a person with regard to whom assistance punishment as defined in item (ii) of Article 2 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons is to be enforced and who is currently undergoing a protective measure"; additional technicalities requiring alternative readings in connection with the application of these provisions shall be determined by a Cabinet order.
第二十一条 共助刑の執行に関しては、第十六条第一項第一号の共助刑の執行を受ける者を懲役に処せられた者と、同項第二号の共助刑の執行を受ける者を禁錮に処せられた者と、同項第一号の共助刑を懲役と、同項第二号の共助刑を禁錮とそれぞれみなして、刑法（明治四十年法律第四十五号）第二十二条、第二十四条、第二十八条、第二十九条、第三十一条から第三十三条まで及び第三十四条第一項、刑事訴訟法第四百七十四条、第四百八十条から第四百八十二条まで、第四百八十四条から第四百八十九条まで、第五百二条から第五百四条まで及び第五百七条、少年法（昭和二十三年法律第百六十八号）第二条第一項、第二十七条第一項、第五十六条、第五十七条及び第六十一条、少年院法（昭和二十三年法律第百六十九号）第一条、第二条、第四条から第九条まで、第十条第一項、第十条の二、第十三条、第十四条第一項、第四項及び第五項、第十四条の二から第十六条まで、第十七条第二項、第十七条の二並びに第十七条の四から第十七条の六まで並びに更生保護法（平成十九年法律第八十八号）第三条、第四条第二項、第十一条から第十四条まで、第十六条、第二十三条から第三十条まで、第三十三条、第三十四条第一項、第三十五条から第四十条まで、第四十八条、第四十九条第一項、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十二条第二項及び第三項、第五十三条第二項及び第三項、第五十四条第二項、第五十五条から第五十八条まで、第六十条から第六十五条まで、第七十五条から第七十七条まで、第八十二条、第八十四条から第八十八条まで並びに第九十一条から第九十八条までの規定を適用する。この場合において、刑法第二十八条中「三分の一」とあるのは「三分の一（国際受刑者移送法第二条第七号の裁判国（以下「裁判国」という。）において同法第二条第十一号の受入移送犯罪（以下「受入移送犯罪」という。）に係る確定裁判において言い渡された同法第二条第一号の外国刑（以下「外国刑」という。）の執行としての拘禁をしたとされる日数を含む。）」と、「十年」とあるのは「十年（裁判国において受入移送犯罪に係る確定裁判において言い渡された外国刑の執行としての拘禁をしたとされる日数を含む。）」と、同法第三十二条中「刑の言渡しが確定した後」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第十三条の命令により裁判国から引渡しを受けた後」と、刑事訴訟法第四百七十四条中「二以上の」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第二条第二号の共助刑（以下「共助刑」という。）と」と、「その重いもの」とあり、及び「重い刑」とあるのは「共助刑」と、「他の刑」とあるのは「主刑」と、同法第四百八十条及び第四百八十二条中「刑の言渡をした裁判所に対応する検察庁」とあるのは「東京地方検察庁」と、同法第四百八十七条中「刑名」とあるのは「共助刑の種類」と、同法第五百二条中「裁判の執行を受ける者」とあるのは「共助刑の執行を受ける者」と、「言渡をした裁判所」とあるのは「東京地方裁判所」と、少年法第二十七条第一項中「保護処分の継続中、本人に対して有罪判決が確定した」とあり、及び同法第五十七条中「保護処分の継続中、懲役、禁錮又は拘留の刑が確定した」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第二条第二号の共助刑の執行を受ける者が保護処分の継続中である」とし、その他これらの規定の適用に関し必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム - (2) Every corporation whose total assets (meaning the amount of total assets appearing in the latest balance sheet; the same shall apply hereinafter) exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than two billion yen, and whose total assets, coupled with total assets of subsidiaries of the said corporation, and a corporation in Japan which holds majority of voting rights of all stockholders of the said corporation (hereinafter referred to as "sum of the total assets"), exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than ten billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "stockholding corporation" in this Article), in case that it acquires or holds the stocks (including the stocks held in monetary or security trust, where the stockholding corporation is a settlor or beneficiary and may exercise the voting rights or give instructions to the trustee regarding the exercise of such voting rights) of another corporation in Japan whose total assets exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than one billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "issuing corporation" in this Article), so that the ratio of voting rights pertaining to the stocks acquired or held by the stockholding corporation to voting rights of all stockholders of the issuing corporation is to exceed the percentage figure provided for in a Cabinet Order (in the case that more than one percentage figures are provided for, any of such percentage figures pursuant to the provisions of such Cabinet Order), shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission, a written report on such stocks within thirty days from the date of the relevant exceeding; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the all the issued stocks of issuing corporation is acquired simultaneously with the incorporation, cases where a corporation engaged in banking or insurance business (excluding certain corporations engaged in insurance business as provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article) acquires or holds stocks of other corporations in Japan (excluding those engaged in banking or insurance business and those as otherwise provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article), or cases where a corporation engaged in securities business (excluding securities brokers) acquires or holds stocks in the course of its business.
２ 会社であつて、その総資産の額（最終の貸借対照表による資産の合計金額をいう。以下同じ。）が二十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超え、かつ、当該会社並びに当該会社の子会社及び当該会社の総株主の議決権の過半数を有する国内の会社の総資産の額を合計した額（以下「総資産合計額」という。）が百億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの（以下この条において「株式所有会社」という。）は、他の国内の会社であつてその総資産の額が十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの（以下この項において「株式発行会社」という。）の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合（金銭又は有価証券の信託に係る株式について、自己が、委託者若しくは受益者となり議決権を行使することができる場合又は議決権の行使について受託者に指図を行うことができる場合を含む。）において、株式発行会社の総株主の議決権に占める株式所有会社の当該取得し、又は所有する株式に係る議決権の割合が、百分の十を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める数値（複数の数値を定めた場合にあつては、政令で定めるところにより、それぞれの数値）を超えることとなるときは、公正取引委員会規則で定めるところにより、その超えることとなつた日から三十日以内に、当該株式に関する報告書を公正取引委員会に提出しなければならない。ただし、株式発行会社の発行済の株式の全部をその設立と同時に取得する場合、銀行業又は保険業を営む会社が他の国内の会社（銀行業又は保険業を営む会社その他公正取引委員会規則で定める会社を除く。次条第一項及び第二項において同じ。）の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合及び証券業を営む会社（証券仲介業者を除く。）が業務として株式を取得し、又は所有する場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
- ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
- Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
- 本サービスで使用している「Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス」はWikipediaの日本語文を独立行政法人情報通信研究機構が英訳したものを、Creative Comons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0による利用許諾のもと使用しております。詳細はhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ および http://alaginrc.nict.go.jp/WikiCorpus/ をご覧下さい。
- 特許庁
- Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
- 金融庁
- Copyright(C) 2026 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
