pet regressionとは意味・読み方・使い方

出典:『Wiktionary』 (2026/08/01 04:54 UTC 版)

^ For anecdotal evidence, see @calicocatbabie (24 June 2019), X [formerly Twitter]‎, archived from the original on 31 July 2026: “Do you consider pet regression to be 100% sfw ¶ Yes 88.3% ¶ No 11.7% ¶ 60 votes·Final results”
^ Cf. sendingbugs [username] (6 October 2024), Tumblr‎, archived from the original on 31 July 2026:

Question for alterhumans and pet regressors: ¶ Do you consider pet regression to be a kind of alterhumanity? ¶ Are pet regressors alterhumans? ¶ Yes, they are 28% ¶ No, they’re not 8.5% ¶ Yes, but not fully 8.1% ¶ No, but they’re adjacent 24.4% ¶ I’m not sure 21.5% ¶ See results 9.3% ¶ Final result from 246 votes ¶ As in, even without being any other kind of alterhuman. Like if someone only pet regresses but isn’t a therian/otherkin/etc.
^ Cf. d0gbite [username] (28 April 2025), Tumblr‎, archived from the original on 31 July 2026:

another one! because i have a similar question for fellow alterhumans ¶ do you consider pet regression alterhuman? ¶ yes, inherently 11% ¶ yes, unless they tell me otherwise 35.4% ¶ no, unless they tell me otherwise 42.3% ¶ no, inherently 3.3% ¶ don’t know/don’t care/see results 8.1% ¶ Final result from 246 votes ¶ i (as a pet regressor & therian) would say yes unless they tell me otherwise, since i don’t really see pet regression as a “societally normal” part of humanity. but of course if someone told me it isn’t for them, that’s completely fair. everyone’s different!

Wiktionary英語版での「pet regression」の意味