Japan Health Insurance Associationとは 意味・読み方・使い方

Japan Health Insurance Association administered health insurance例文帳に追加

全国健康保険協会 - 厚生労働省

The operation of government‐managed health insurance has now been taken over by the Japan Health Insurance Association.例文帳に追加

政府管掌健康保険の業務は今や全国健康保険協会に引き継がれている。 - Weblio英語基本例文集

The purpose of this survey is to capture the situation of medical treatment, diseases and injuries, dispensing, and use of drugs relating to recipients of medical care under the health insurance managed by the Japan Health Insurance Association (hereinafter "Association Insurance"), Society-managed employment-based health insurance (hereinafter, "Society Insurance"), National Health Insurance (hereinafter, "NHI"), and the Medical care system for the latter-stage elderly (hereinafter "Medical care for latter-stage elderly"), and to obtain basic data for the administration of health insurance.例文帳に追加

この調査は、医療保険制度における医療の給付の受給者にかかる診療行為の内容、傷病の状況、調剤行為の内容及び薬剤の使用状況等を明らかにし、医療保険行政に必要な基礎資料を得ることを目的とする。 - 厚生労働省

as regards Japan, any of the insurance institutions, or any association thereof, responsible for the implementation of the Japanese pension systems and the Japanese health insurance systems specified in paragraph 1 of Article 2,例文帳に追加

日本国については、次条１に掲げる日本国の年金制度及び日本国の医療保険制度の実施に責任を有する保険機関（その連合組織を含む。） - 厚生労働省

Article 207 (1) When corresponding to any one item of the following, an Officer, liquidator, or personnel of a health insurance society, national health insurance society, mutual aid association, or the Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan shall be fined an amount not to exceed 300,000 yen:発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第二百七条　次の各号の一に該当する場合には、その違反行為をした健康保険組合、国民健康保険組合、共済組合又は日本私立学校振興・共済事業団の役員、清算人又は職員は、三十万円以下の罰金に処する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(f) "competent institution" means, as regards Japan, any of the insurance institutions, or any association thereof, responsible for the implementation of the Japanese pension systems and the Japanese health insurance systems specified in paragraph 1 of Article 2,as regards the United States, the Social Security Administration;例文帳に追加

(f)「実施機関」とは、日本国については、次条１に掲げる日本国の年金制度及び日本国の医療保険制度の実施に責任を有する保険機関（その連合組織を含む。)をいい、合衆国については、社会保障庁をいう。 - 厚生労働省

I take it that you are asking about the proposed amendment to the Insurance Business Act that has been passed to the current session for continued deliberation. I assume that you are questioning the appropriateness of a mutual aid business of a public interest corporation or the arrangement in which a mutual aid business of a given public interest corporation is to be supervised by the former competent authorities, with an implication that the FSA should be responsible for supervision. Well, the fact is that the respective authorities, having the experience of supervising public interest corporations for a long time, are well-versed with specifics of their operation. On the subject of this Act, I believe that I named several examples the other day, such as the Japan Medical Association, which has always been supervised by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare since the Meiji era, including the years of supervision by its predecessor, the Health and Medical Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. While circumstances vary from authority to authority, they know very extensively about internal affairs of those corporations and have exercised thorough supervision and, in that sense, have a set of knowledge of their operation and other information accumulated in the course of the work of supervision in the past, which accordingly makes them presumably capable of delivering more fine-tuned supervision than the FSA would be. Since the most important thing is policyholder protection, we believe that, from such a perspective, having the former authorities supervise them is an appropriate way to go. It is also in comprehensive consideration of overall circumstances, including the fact that this exemption of the Act is a provisional step, that we find it appropriate to have the former authorities continue to supervise those corporations.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

継続審議となっている保険業法の改正案のことだと思いますけれども、公益法人の共済事業あるいは旧主務官庁が監督することになっていますが、それはいかがなものかと、金融庁として監督すべきではないかという質問かと思いますけれども、公益法人というのは、それぞれの官庁が長い間、公益法人の監督をしてきたわけでございますから、その業務に関しては、各監督官庁が事情をよく知っており、この法律については、幾つかこの前も申し上げたと思いますが、例えば、日本医師会は確か明治以来、厚生省、当時の内務省衛生局が、ずっと監督官庁でございまして、各省色々ありますけれども、内部のことを非常によく知っており、各主務官庁がきめ細かい監督を行っていますから、そういった意味で、その業務に関する知見やこれまでの監督について蓄積している情報がございますので、金融庁に比べてより細かな監督を行うことができると考えられまして、契約者保護ということが一番大事ではございますが、そういった観点から（旧主務官庁が監督することが）適当というふうに考えております。そして、この法律の特例は当分の間という措置でございますので、そういったことを総合的に勘案して、引き続き旧主務官庁が監督することが適切だと考えております。 - 金融庁