Furthermore, there is a question about the credibility of the genealogy since Muramune was eventually able to succeed the family headship without being adopted by somebody because Muramune was a child of Norimune who was a grandchild of Norinaga URAGAMI, the direct descendant of the Uragami clan.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

それに元々浦上氏の嫡流であった浦上則永の孫に当たるので則宗の子、養子が悉く死んだ後ならば誰の養子にならずとも相続の順が回って来たとしても不思議ではない為、これらの系図の信憑性には疑問が残る。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

On the other hand, there is a view that the author was somebody who supported the Emperor Kameyama and his descendants, Daikakuji-to (Imperial lineage starting with the Emperor Kameyama), because the author did not pay much attention to the Emperor Fushimi (a son of the Emperor Gofukakusa; after the enthronement of the Crown Prince of the Emperor Kameyama, he was made a new Crown Prince by the retired Emperor Gofukakusa), although the author knew that he would be an Emperor later.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

また、のちに伏見天皇となる伏見天皇の存在（後深草天皇の子、亀山天皇の皇太子（後宇多天皇）の即位後、後深草上皇の働きかけで皇太子に立てられた）を知りながら、その存在を過小に書いていることから、著者を亀山天皇とその子孫である大覚寺統を支持していたと見る向きもある。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

For Mitsuyuki's whereabouts in the Jokyu War that occurred thereafter, some consider that "Toki Hogandai" mentioned in the said record as a member of the Imperial forces was identified as Mitsuyuki and that he sided with Kyoto like many samurai in Mino Province, but there is no definitive explanation on his identity and whereabouts with respect to this record because there is also a persuasive theory that the said "Toki Hogandai" was somebody else in the same family (such as his brother Mitsutoki) and that Mitsuyuki himself sided with the shogunate forces considering the fact that Mitsuyuki is also mentioned in the same record as "Toki Saemon no jo" after the Jokyu War.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

しかし、その後の承久の乱における動向については同書に官軍としてみえている「土岐判官代」を光行と比定し、多くの美濃国の武士たちと同じく京方に付いたとする見方がある一方で、光行が乱の後にも「土岐左衛門尉」として同書に現われていることなどから「土岐判官代」は同族の別人（弟・光時か）であるとし、光行自身は幕府方に付き行動していたとする見方も有力視されるなど明確でない。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス