economic interpretationとは 意味・読み方・使い方

Regional trade agreements, including free trade agreements ("FTAs"), economic partnership agreements ("EPAs"), and bilateral investment treaties ("BITs") usually contain certain provisions for settlement of disputes between the state parties concerning the interpretation and application thereof.例文帳に追加

一般的に、地域貿易協定（自由貿易協定（Free Trade Agreement(FTA)）、経済連携協定(Economic Partnership Agreement(EPA))等）及び 二国間投資協定（Bilateral Investment Treaty(BIT)）には、協定の解釈及び適用に関す る国家間の争いを解決するための規定が設けら れている。 - 経済産業省

The WTO agreements develop free and fair trade rules in order to resolve economic friction and dispute through the interpretation and application of rules and prepared regulations for the dispute settlement process.例文帳に追加

WTO協定は、自由かつ公正な貿易ルールを策定すると同時に、加盟国間に通商摩擦・紛争が生じた際にルールの解釈・適用を通じてその解決を図るための、紛争解決手続に係る規律を備えている。 - 経済産業省

Interpretation of Article XXIV became an issue in the review of the Treaty of Rome that established the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1957 and only six cases of the 69 working parties that had completed reviews by the end of 1994 had been able to reach a consensus on conformity questions.例文帳に追加

GATT 第24条の解釈は、1957年のヨーロッパ経済共同体（EEC）を設立したローマ条約に対する審査において問題となり、1994年末までに審査を終了した69の作業部会のうち、整合性の問題につきコンセンサスに達することができたのはわずか６件という状況であった。 - 経済産業省

Due to a decline in foreign tourists who visited the district in the experiment period, as a result of the global economic slowdown and strong yen following the Lehman shock, the system was used less than initially expected. However, the district has begun discussion on putting the interpretation service to practical use, based on the know-how derived by the experiment.例文帳に追加

リーマン・ショック以降の世界的な景気減速と円高の影響を受け、実験期間中に同地域を訪問する外国人客が減少したため、当初の想定よりも利用件数は下回ったが、同地域では実証実験で得たノウハウを基に、通訳サービスの実用化に向けた検討を始めている。 - 経済産業省

In contrast, the Andean Community and the EEA (with respect to only those disputes concerning the rules of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community or the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community, or the interpretation of the EEA provisions relevant to the measures adopted to implement such treaties) provide that the disputed matter which such council type body has failed to settle can be referred to a permanent court that has been established within the relevant region. In this respect, the Andean Community has established a permanent court which addresses any dispute under such agreement, and the EEA has appointed the Court of Justice of the European Communities to address any dispute under such agreement (except for disputes between EFTA countries, which are referred to the EFTA Court).例文帳に追加

これに対して、 Andean Community及び一部分野（Treaty establishing the European Economic Community 及びTreaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Communityの規律又はこれら の適用のために採用された措置に相当する EEA の規定の解釈に関する紛争）に関する EEA は、かかる機関において問題を解決できな い場合は、域内に設置された常設裁判所に提訴 できるとしている（Andean Communityでは協 定上の紛争事項を解決する常設裁判所、EEA で はEC 裁判所（the Court of Justice of the European Communities）を指定（ただし、 EFTA 諸国間の紛争はEFTA Court に付 託）。）。 - 経済産業省

Article 1105, paragraph 1 of NAFTA provides an obligation to accord fair and equitable treatment “in accordance with international law.” However, in the Pope and Talbot case it was held that because NAFTA was entered into for the purpose of building a closer economic relationship between the three countries of North America, there is not only an obligation to provide treatment consistent with the minimum standard under international law, but also obligations in addition to such minimum standard. In addition, in the S.D. Myers case it was held that a breach of other provisions under NAFTA automatically establishes a breach of general treatment obligations. Criticisms regarding the interpretation of this provision were raised mainly in the U.S. With a view to posing limitations on the expansive reading of this obligation, the NAFTA Free Trade Commission, in response to such criticisms, published “Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions” on August 1, 2001 confirming that general treatment obligations do not exceed that which is required by the customary international law minimum standard for treatment of aliens, and a breach of another provision of NAFTA, or of a separate international agreement, does not establish that there has been a breach of the general treatment obligations.例文帳に追加

なお、NAFTA 第1105条第１項は、「国際法に従って」公正衡平待遇を与える義務を規定しているが、Pope and Talbot 事件で、NAFTAが北米三国間により一層強固な経済関係を築く目的で締結されたものであることなどから一般国際法上の義務のみでなく、これに付加的なものであるとの判断が下されたこと、また、S.D.Myers事件ではNAFTA 上のこの他の規定に違反している場合、必然的に一般待遇義務にも違反するとの判断が下されたことから、米国を中心にこの規定の解釈について批判の声があがり、これを受ける形で2001年８ 月１ 日にNAFTA 自由貿易委員会（NAFTA FreeTrade Commission）は、公正衡平待遇義務は慣習国際法上の最低基準を付与するものであり、それ以上の待遇を求めるものではないこと、NAFTA 上又は他の国際協定の公正衡平待遇義務以外の義務違反があったことによって、公正衡平待遇義務違反があったこととはならないことを確認する覚書（Notes of Interpretationof Certain Chapter 11Provisions）を公表し、この義務の範囲に制限をかけた。 - 経済産業省