森田実の英語

萩黒川にある藩主本陣・森田邸(吉田松陰養母実家にあたる)に逗留し、兵学、外国情勢などを学ぶ。例文帳に追加

He stayed at Morita house (the family home of the foster mother of Shoin YOSHIDA) which was Honjin (a hotel) of the lord of domain at Kurokawa in Hagi, and learned military science, foreign affairs and so on.発音を聞く  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

以蔵らが最終的に捕縛された際、この事件についての取調べもあったといい、実行犯の1人である森田金三郎だけが黙秘を貫いたため生き残って戊辰戦争に参戦している。例文帳に追加

It was said that there was an interrogation when Izo and the others were finally arrested, and only Kinzaburo MORITA, who remained silent, survived, and took part in the Boshin War.発音を聞く  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

聖徳太子虚構説に対する反論としては、遠山美都男『聖徳太子はなぜ天皇になれなかったのか』（2000年）、上原和『世界史上の聖徳太子-東洋の愛と智慧』（2002年）、直木孝次郎「厩戸王の政治的地位について」、上田正昭「歴史からみた太子像の虚実」（『聖徳太子の実像と幻像』所収）（2001年）、曽根正人『聖徳太子と飛鳥仏教』（2007年）、森田悌『推古朝と聖徳太子』（2005年）などがある。例文帳に追加

Those opposing the persons insisting that Shotoku Taishi was a fictitious figure include: Mitsuo TOYAMA, who wrote "Shotoku Taishi ha Naze Tenno ni Narenakattanoka" (Why Shotoku Taishi could not become the emperor) (2000); Kazu UEHARA, who wrote "Sekaishijo no Shotoku Taishi - Toyo no Ai to Chie" (Shotoku Taishi in the world history - Compassion and Wisdom of the East) (2002); Kojiro NAOKI, who wrote 'Umayatoo no Seijiteki-chii ni Tsuite' (About the political status of Umayatoo); Masaaki UEDA, who wrote 'Rekishi kara Mita Taishi Zo no Kyojitsu' (Fact and Fiction of the figure of Taishi from the historical view) (contained in the "Shotoku Taishi no Jitsuzo to Genzo" [Fact and Fiction of Shotoku Taishi]) (2001); Masato SONE, who wrote "Shotoku Taishi to Asuka Bukkyo" (Shotoku Taishi and Asuka Buddhism) (2007); and Tei MORITA, who wrote "Suikocho to Shotoku Taishi" (the Court of Empress Suiko and Shotoku Taishi) (2005).発音を聞く  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

その一方で、平安時代中期の著作である『政事要略』が書名を『貞観儀式』とせずに『儀式貞観』としているのは、当初からこの書名は『儀式』と称されており、『政事要略』は単に脚注として編纂年代である元号の「貞観」を付記したに過ぎないこと、『本朝法家文書目録』は今日では存在が疑問視されている三代儀式の存在を前提に書いており、実際には存在しなかった弘仁儀式を掲げるなど正確性に疑問があるとして、正式な書名は『儀式』であるとする森田悌らの説も存在する。例文帳に追加

On the other hand, Tei MORITA etc. asserted the official book title must be "Gishiki" arguing that the author of "Seiji yoryaku," compiled during the mid-Heian period, used "Gishiki Jogan" instead of "Jogan gishiki" in order to add the era name of "Jogan" in which the book was compiled while acknowledging the title of the book was "Gishiki" from the very beginning, and that the credibility of "Honcho hoka monjo mokuroku" is doubtful because it was written on the premise of the existence of Sandai gishiki whose existence is questioned at present and it listed Konin gishiki (ceremony in the manner of the Konin era) which, in reality, did not exist.発音を聞く  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス