「technical ability」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(2ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

The Professional Engineers System is to accredit competent engineers with technical expertise related to scientific technology, and high level of practical ability and abundant experience in profession, and also with high level of engineers’ ethics. Since the Professional Engineers of Nuclear and Radiation Technology was established, qualifying test is conducted every year, and as a result, the number of nuclear engineers who obtain this qualification is increasing, and thus the new system has contributed to development of human resources in nuclear fields.例文帳に追加

科学技術に関する技術的専門知識と高等の応用能力及び豊富な実務経験を有し、高い技術者倫理を備えた、優れた技術者を認定するもので原子力・放射線部門の技術士が設置されて以降、毎年資格試験が実施されており、この資格を取得する原子力分野の技術者が増加するなど、原子力分野の人材の充実に貢献している。 - 経済産業省

Article 31-2 (1) A person who has a foreign qualification in science and technology, which is equivalent or more than a professional engineer (Japan) and the qualification is certified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and who is recognized by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology to have considerable knowledge and ability to conduct business in Japan regarding any professional engineer technical disciplines based on Japanese laws and regulations, shall be qualified to become a professional engineer notwithstanding the provision of Article 4 (3). 例文帳に追加

第三十一条の二　技術士と同等以上の科学技術に関する外国の資格のうち文部科学省令で定めるものを有する者であつて、我が国においていずれかの技術部門について我が国の法令に基づき技術士の業務を行うのに必要な相当の知識及び能力を有すると文部科学大臣が認めたものは、第四条第三項の規定にかかわらず、技術士となる資格を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Well-known or commonly used arts as references of the claimed inventions should be submitted since they are important materials constituting the state of the art, which can be grounds for a notice of reasons for refusal to a maximum extent, unless they are so well-known that the submission seems unnecessary. They are considered important regardless of whether or not they are used as a basis to find the cited inventions or to confirm the knowledge of a person skilled in the art (about the state of the art including the common general knowledge) or to confirm ability (about using general technical means for research and development or about creating arts ordinarily). 例文帳に追加

周知・慣用技術は拒絶理由の根拠となる技術水準の内容を構成する重要な資料であるので、引用するときは、それを引用発明の認定の基礎として用いるか、当業者の知識(技術常識等を含む技術水準)又は能力(研究開発のための通常の技術的手段を用いる能力や通常の創作能力)の認定の基礎として用いるかにかかわらず、例示するまでもないときを除いて可能な限り文献を示す。 - 特許庁

Section 36 (4) (i) of the Patent Act states that "the detailed description of the invention shall be stated....in such a manner sufficiently clear and complete for the invention to be carried out by a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains." This means that "the detailed description of the invention shall be described in such a manner that a person who has ability to use ordinary technical means for research and development (including comprehension of document, experimentation, analysis and manufacture) and to exercise ordinary creativity in the art to which the invention pertains can carry out the claimed invention on the basis of matters described in the specification (excluding claims) and drawings taking into consideration the common general knowledge as of the filing." 例文帳に追加

第36条第4項第1号は「発明の詳細な説明は、・・・その発明の属する技術の分野における通常の知識を有する者がその実施をすることができる程度に明確かつ十分に、記載しなければならない。」と規定されているが、これは、「その発明の属する技術分野において研究開発(文献解析、実験、分析、製造等を含む)のための通常の技術的手段を用い、通常の創作能力を発揮できる者(当業者)が、明細書及び図面に記載した事項と出願時の技術常識とに基づき、請求項に係る発明を実施することができる程度に、発明の詳細な説明を記載しなければならない」旨を意味するものである。 - 特許庁