三・一八事件の英語

５　製品安全協会の解散及び清算には、民法第七十三条、第七十五条、第七十六条及び第七十八条から第八十三条まで並びに非訟事件手続法（明治三十一年法律第十四号）第三十五条第二項、第三十六条、第三十七条ノ二、第百三十五条ノ二十五第二項及び第三項、第百三十六条、第百三十七条並びに第百三十八条の規定を準用する。この場合において、民法第七十五条中「前条」とあるのは、「通商産業省関係の基準・認証制度等の整理及び合理化に関する法律（平成十一年法律第百二十一号）附則第十三条第二項」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Article 73, Article 75, Article 76 and Article 78 to Article 83 of the Civil Code; and Article 35, paragraph (2), Article 36 and Article 37-2, Article 135-25, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3), Article 136, Article 137 and Article 138 of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedure Act (Act No. 14 of 1898) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the dissolution and liquidation of the Consumer Product Safety Association. In this case, the term "the preceding Article" in Article 75 of the Civil Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 13, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions to the Act on Consolidation and Streamlining of Standards and Certification Systems Relating to the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (Act No. 121 of 1999)".発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　第一項の規定により課徴金の納付を命ずる場合において、当該事業者が、当該違反行為に係る事件について第四十七条第一項第四号に掲げる処分又は第百二条第一項に規定する処分が最初に行われた日（以下この条において「調査開始日」という。）の一月前の日（当該処分が行われなかつたときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について第五十条第六項において読み替えて準用する第四十九条第五項の規定による通知（次項及び第七項において「事前通知」という。）を受けた日の一月前の日）までに当該違反行為をやめた者（次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為に係る実行期間が二年未満である場合に限る。）であるときは、第一項中「百分の十」とあるのは「百分の八」と、「百分の三」とあるのは「百分の二・四」と、「百分の二」とあるのは「百分の一・六」と、前項中「百分の四」とあるのは「百分の三・二」と、「百分の一・二」とあるのは「百分の一」と、「百分の一」とあるのは「百分の〇・八」とする。例文帳に追加

(5) In the case that an entrepreneur is ordered to pay a surcharge pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1, the term "ten percent" appearing in paragraph 1 shall be "eight percent," the term "three percent" shall be "two point four percent", the term "two percent" shall be "one point six percent", the term "four percent" in the preceding paragraph shall be "three point two percent", the term "one point two percent" shall be "one percent", and the term "one percent" shall be "zero point eight percent" if the said entrepreneur had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph) by the day one month prior to the date when the measure listed in item 4 of paragraph 1 of Article 47 or the measure as provided for in paragraph 1 of Article 102 was first made in relation to the case pertaining to the said violation (hereinafter referred to as "investigation start date" in this Article) (if the said measure is not made, the day one month prior to the date when the said entrepreneur received the notice pertaining to the said violation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 5 of Article 49, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph 6 of Article 50 after deemed replacement (hereinafter referred to as "advance notice" in next paragraph and paragraph 7).発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第八条の二（排除措置）、第二十条（不公正な取引方法に係る排除措置）、第二十五条（無過失損害賠償責任）、第二十六条（損害賠償請求権の裁判上の主張の制限、消滅時効）及び第八章第二節（手続）（第四十六条、第四十九条第三項から第五項まで、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十三条、第五十五条第二項、第五項及び第六項、第五十九条第二項、第六十五条、第六十七条、第六十九条第三項、第七十条の二第四項、第七十条の九から第七十条の十一まで並びに第七十条の十二第一項を除く。）の規定の適用については、前項に規定する違反行為は同法第十九条（不公正な取引方法の禁止）の規定に違反する行為（事業者団体が事業者に当該行為に該当する行為をさせるようにする場合にあつては、同法第八条第一項第五号（事業者団体による不公正な取引方法の禁止）の不公正な取引方法に該当する行為）と、排除命令は排除措置命令とみなす。この場合において、同法第四十九条第一項（排除措置命令）中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「違反行為を排除し、又は違反行為が排除されたことを確保するために必要な措置」とあるのは「その行為の差止め若しくはその行為が再び行われることを防止するために必要な事項又はこれらの実施に関連する公示その他必要な事項」と、同条第二項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同条第六項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「六十日」とあるのは「三十日」と、同法第七十条の十五（事件記録の閲覧・謄写又は排除措置命令書等の謄抄本の交付）中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同法第七十条の二十一（行政手続法の適用除外）中「第三章」とあるのは「第三章（第十三条第一項及び第三節を除く。）」とする。例文帳に追加

(2) Violation as provided for in the preceding Paragraph shall be deemed as violation of Article 19 (Prohibition of unfair trade practices) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (in the case where trade associations induce entrepreneurs to employ such acts as falls under the said violation, such acts as falls under unfair trade practices as provided for in the Article 8 (1) (v) of the said Act (Prohibition of unfair trade practices by trade associations)), and a cease and desist order under this Act shall be deemed as a cease and desist order under the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade, for the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 8-2 (Elimination measures against trade associations), Article 20 (Elimination measures against unfair trade practices), Article 25 (Absolute liability), Article 26 (Restriction on exercise of the right to claim for damages in court, prescription) and provisions of Section 2 (Procedures) of Chapter VIII (Excluding Article 46, Article 49 (3) through (5) inclusive, Article 50, Article 51, Article 53, Article 55 (2), (5) and (6), Article 59 (2), Article 65, Article 67, Article 69 (3), Article 70-2 (4), Article 70-9 through 70-11 inclusive, and Article 70-12 (1)). In this case, in Article 49 (1), the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the written (cease and desist) order"; and the term "the measures necessary to eliminate the violation or to ensure that the violation is eliminated" shall be replaced with "the matters necessary to cease such an act, or to prevent the resurgence of the said act, or to take any other matters including public notice of the matters relating to the implementation of such measures"; in paragraph (2) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "a written cease and desist order"; in Paragraph (6) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order," and the term "sixty days" shall be replaced with "thirty days"; in Article 70-15 the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order"; and in Article 70-21, the term "Chapter III" shall be replaced with "Chapter III (Excluding Article 13 (1) and Section 3).発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム