general mandatoryとは 意味・読み方・使い方

Members of the Imperial family received mandatory general education between the ages of 6 and 20, and as a rule attended the Gakushuin Boys' and Girls' Schools(Ordinance of the Education of the Imperial Family).発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

皇族は満6歳から満20歳まで普通教育を受けるものとされ、原則として学習院又は女子学習院で就学するものとされた（皇族就学令）。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

Pursuant to Article 11, Paragraph 1 of the Act on General Rules of the Application of Laws ("hou no tekiyou ni kansuru junsokuhou" in Japanese, hereinafter, the "Act on the Application of Laws"), where a consumer who is a permanent resident of Japan enters into a transaction with a foreign business entity via the internet, the consumer can be protected under the consumer protection laws and regulations of the jurisdiction which have been pre-agreed upon by and between the parties. In addition, the consumer will also be protected under certain mandatory clauses set forth in consumer protection laws of Japan, providing that the consumer had expressly declared to the business entity that such clauses shall take effect in the transaction.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

通則法第１１条第１項に従えば、我が国に常居所を有する消費者が海外の事業者との間でインターネットを介して取引を行った場合、当事者が選択した準拠法の所属国の消費者保護法規の保護を受けるだけではなく、当該消費者が我が国の消費者保護法規中の強行規定に基づく特定の効果を主張した場合には、その強行規定による保護を受けることができる。 - 経済産業省

Furthermore, in application of above-mentioned Ministerial Ordinance, if it is recognized that the problem to be solved was not envisaged as in case of an invention developed based on a new idea completely different from the prior art or based on the discovery resulted from try and error, the description of the problem to be solved is not mandatory. In this case, however, unless the unsolved technical problem to be solved by the invention as of the filing can be conceived based on the entire description of the specification and drawings taking into consideration the common general knowledge as of the filing, it is deemed that there is no relationship under Section 37(i) due to the lack of a problem to be solved.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

また、上記委任省令の運用においては、従来の技術と全く異なる新規な発想に基づき開発された発明又は試行錯誤の結果の発見に基づく発明等のように、もともと解決すべき課題が想定されていないと認められる場合には、解決しようとする課題の記載は求めないが、この場合には、明細書及び図面全体の記載並びに出願時の技術常識に基づいて、出願時まで未解決であった、その発明が解決しようとする技術上の課題を把握できない限り、解決しようとする課題はないこととなるので第 37 条第1 号の関係を有しない。 - 特許庁

Japan's EPAs could fall under category (2) above, in that each of the two of the three arbitrators required thereunder is appointed by each party, and the parties thereto are required to propose a certain number of candidates for the third panelist (who shall be the chairperson), and negotiate this matter. However, they differ from category (2) above in that, if no agreement has been reached on the selection of the chairperson by and between the parties prior to the mandatory deadlines thereunder: (i) the Secretariat-General of the WTO may be requested to appoint the third arbitrator (see, for example, Japan - Malaysia EPA, Article 148, Paragraph4), or (ii) the third arbitrator may be chosen by lot (see, for example, Japan - Mexico EPA, Article 153, Paragraph 6, Japan - Singapore EPA, Article 143, Paragraph 4(d), and Japan - Philippines EPA, Article 153, Paragraph 5).例文帳に追加

我が国のEPA は、３人の仲裁人のうち２人がそ れぞれ１人ずつ各締約国により選任された後、議 長となる３人目の仲裁人を選任するにあたり、各 締約国が候補者を一定人数ずつ挙げて調整を図 る、との点で上記②に該当しているものの、両国が 期限までに合意に達しなかった場合の最終的な議 長選定方法については、各協定で様々な規定が置 かれている（WTO事務局長への選任依頼（日マレ ーシア148条４項）、くじ引き（日メキシコ153条 ６項、日シンガポール143条４項、日フィリピン 153条５項））。 - 経済産業省

(4) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Non-existence or Invalidation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Action Seeking Revocation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damage in Cases Where the Plaintiff is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i), sub-item (g)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of the non-existence or invalidity of a resolution made at a general meeting of members of a Specific Purpose Company or an action seeking the rescission of such a resolution. In this case, the phrases "a Shareholder, etc. (or, in cases where the Shareholders Meeting, etc., set forth respectively in each such items is an Organizational Meeting or a Class Organizational Meeting, a Shareholder, etc., a Shareholder at Incorporation, a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" and "a director, company auditor or liquidator (or, in cases where such resolution is a resolution of shareholders meeting or Class Meeting, it shall include a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 346(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)), and in cases where such resolution is a resolution of an Organizational Meeting or Class Organizational Meeting, it shall include a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" in Article 831(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors, and liquidators" and "a director, company auditor, or liquidator (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor, or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 76(1) of the Asset Securitization Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 168(5) of the Asset Securitization Act))" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（資産流動化法第七十六条第一項（資産流動化法第百六十八条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム