「Order for Implementation」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(5ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(2) When a registered foreign conformity assessment body issues a certification of type (certification of type prescribed in Article 56 paragraph (1) of the Telecommunications Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) in respect of a type (including the method to verify that each terminal equipment conforms to the type) of terminal equipment, the provisions of Article 57 through Article 59, Article 60 paragraph (1), Article 61, Article 62 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3), Article 166 paragraph (3) and Article 167 paragraph (4) and paragraph (6) (including the penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied by regarding the certification of type as a certification of type issued by a registered approval body and the person who has obtained the certification of type from the registered foreign conformity assessment body as a person who has obtained a certification of type from a registered approval body. In this case, the term "registered approval body" in Article 60 paragraph (1) item (v) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "registered foreign conformity assessment body prescribed in the first sentence in Article 31 paragraph (1) of the Act for Implementation of the Mutual Recognition between Japan and Foreign States in Relation to Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures of Specified Equipment (Act No. 111, 2001)." Other necessary technical replacement shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　登録外国適合性評価機関が端末機器の設計（当該設計に合致することの確認の方法を含む。）について設計認証（電気通信事業法第五十六条第一項に規定する設計認証をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を行った場合には、当該設計認証を登録認定機関がした設計認証と、当該登録外国適合性評価機関による設計認証を受けた者を登録認定機関による設計認証を受けた者とそれぞれみなして、同法第五十七条から第五十九条まで、第六十条第一項、第六十一条、第六十二条第二項及び第三項、第百六十六条第三項並びに第百六十七条第四項及び第六項の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第六十条第一項第五号中「登録認定機関」とあるのは、「特定機器に係る適合性評価手続の結果の外国との相互承認の実施に関する法律（平成十三年法律第百十一号）第三十一条第一項前段に規定する登録外国適合性評価機関」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a registered foreign conformity assessment body issues a certification of construction type (certification of construction type prescribed in Article 38-24 paragraph (1) of the Radio Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) in respect of a construction type (including the method to verify that each equipment conforms to the type) of specified radio equipment, the provisions of Article 38-25 through Article 38-27, Article 38-28 paragraph (1), Article 38-29 and Article 38-30 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) (including the penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied by regarding the certification of construction type as a certification of construction type issued by a registered certification body and the person who has obtained the certification of construction type from the registered foreign conformity assessment body as a person who has obtained a certification of construction type from a registered certification body. In this case, the term "registered certification body" in Article 38-28 paragraph (1) item (v) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "registered foreign conformity assessment body prescribed in the first sentence in Article 33 paragraph (1) of the Act for Implementation of the Mutual Recognition between Japan and Foreign States in Relation to Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures of Specified Equipment (Act No. 111, 2001)." Other necessary technical replacement shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　登録外国適合性評価機関が特定無線設備の工事設計（当該工事設計に合致することの確認の方法を含む。）について工事設計認証（電波法第三十八条の二十四第一項に規定する工事設計認証をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を行った場合には、当該工事設計認証を登録証明機関がした工事設計認証と、当該登録外国適合性評価機関による工事設計認証を受けた者を登録証明機関による工事設計認証を受けた者とそれぞれみなして、同法第三十八条の二十五から第三十八条の二十七まで、第三十八条の二十八第一項、第三十八条の二十九並びに第三十八条の三十第二項及び第三項の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第三十八条の二十八第一項第五号中「登録証明機関」とあるのは、「特定機器に係る適合性評価手続の結果の外国との相互承認の実施に関する法律（平成十三年法律第百十一号）第三十三条第一項前段に規定する登録外国適合性評価機関」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 8-3 The provisions of paragraphs 1, 3 to 5 inclusive, 7 to 13 inclusive, 17, 18 and 21 of Article 7-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an act is committed in violation of the provisions of item 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 8 (limited to cases of committing an act which falls under unreasonable restraint of trade) or item 2 thereof (limited to cases of entering into an international agreement or an international contract which contains such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade). In this case, in paragraph 1 of Article 7-2, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade association"; and the term "order the said entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "order the constituent entrepreneur of the said trade association (including the relevant entrepreneur when an officer, employee, agent, or any other person acting for the benefit of an entrepreneur is a constituent entrepreneur; hereinafter referred to as "specified entrepreneur" in this Article)"; in paragraph 4 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 5 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "had discontinued the business activities that constituted the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation of the business activities that constituted the relevant violation is less than two years)"; in paragraph 7 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 8 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; the term "entrepreneurs that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneurs of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 9 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "entrepreneur that committed the relevant violation" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur of the trade association that committed the relevant violation"; and the term "paragraph 1 or 4 to 6 inclusive" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph 1, 4, or 5"; and the term " has not committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "has not effected the business activities that constituted"; in paragraphs 10 and 11 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; in paragraph 12 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; the term "committed by the relevant entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "committed by the relevant trade association"; the term "commit the violation provided for in paragraph 1" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effect the business activities that constituted the relevant violation"; and the term "discontinuing" shall be deemed to be replaced with "discontinuing the business activities that constituted"; in paragraph 13 of the said Article, the term "entrepreneur" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified entrepreneur"; and the term "violation committed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "report submitted pursuant to the provisions of item 1 of the same paragraph"; and in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the said Article, the term "paragraphs 1, 4 to 6 inclusive, 8, 9, and 14" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 8, and 9". 例文帳に追加

第八条の三　第七条の二第一項、第三項から第五項まで、第七項から第十三項まで、第十七項、第十八項及び第二十一項の規定は、第八条第一項第一号（不当な取引制限に相当する行為をする場合に限る。）又は第二号（不当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定又は国際的契約をする場合に限る。）の規定に違反する行為が行われた場合に準用する。この場合において、第七条の二第一項中「事業者が」とあるのは「事業者団体が」と、「当該事業者に対し」とあるのは「当該事業者団体の構成事業者（事業者の利益のためにする行為を行う役員、従業員、代理人その他の者が構成事業者である場合には、当該事業者を含む。以下この条において「特定事業者」という。）に対し」と、同条第四項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、同条第五項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「をやめた者（次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめた者（当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動」と、同条第七項中「納付すべき事業者」とあるのは「納付すべき特定事業者」と、「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第八項中「当該事業者」とあるのは「当該特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第九項中「当該違反行為をした事業者」とあるのは「当該違反行為をした事業者団体の特定事業者」と、「又は第四項から第六項まで」とあるのは「、第四項又は第五項」と、「をしていた」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をしていた」と、同条第十項及び第十一項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、同条第十二項中「行つた事業者」とあるのは「行つた特定事業者」と、「当該事業者が行つた」とあるのは「当該特定事業者が行つた」と、「、当該事業者」とあるのは「、当該特定事業者」と、「当該事業者がした」とあるのは「当該事業者団体がした」と、「他の事業者」とあるのは「他の特定事業者」と、「第一項に規定する違反行為をする」とあるのは「当該違反行為の実行としての事業活動を行う」と、「をやめる」とあるのは「の実行としての事業活動をやめる」と、同条第十三項中「事業者」とあるのは「特定事業者」と、「した違反行為」とあるのは「行つた同項第一号の規定による報告」と、同条第十七項及び第十八項中「第四項から第六項まで、第八項、第九項又は第十四項」とあるのは「第四項、第五項、第八項又は第九項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 31 (1) When a registered foreign conformity assessment body (limited to those who have been registered in each of the same classifications of business specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications set forth in Article 86 paragraph (1) of the Telecommunications Business Act as a person to approve conformity with the technical standards specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications set forth in Article 52 paragraph (1) of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) issues a technical standards conformity approval (technical standards conformity approval prescribed in Article 53 paragraph (1) of the same act; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph) in respect of the terminal equipment (terminal equipment prescribed in Article 53 paragraph (1) of the same act, provided that such terminal equipment pertains to the classification in which the registered conformity assessment body has been registered; the same shall apply in paragraph (2)), the provisions of Article 53 paragraph (2), Article 54, Article 55 paragraph (1), Article 62 paragraph (1), Article 166 paragraph (2) and Article 167 paragraph (1), paragraph (2) and paragraph (5) (including the penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied by regarding the technical standards conformity approval as a technical standards conformity approval issued by a registered approval body (registered approval body prescribed in Article 53 paragraph (1) of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and the person who has obtained the technical standards conformity approval from the registered foreign conformity assessment body as a person who has obtained a technical standards conformity approval from a registered approval body. In this case, the term "registered approval body" and the term "shall affix" in Article 53 paragraph (2) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "registered foreign conformity assessment body prescribed in the first sentence in Article 31 paragraph (1) of the Act for Implementation of the Mutual Recognition between Japan and Foreign States in Relation to Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures of Specified Equipment (Act No. 111, 2001)" and "may affix," respectively. Other necessary technical replacement shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第三十一条　登録外国適合性評価機関（電気通信事業法第五十二条第一項の総務省令で定める技術基準に適合している旨の認定を行う者として同法第八十六条第一項の総務省令で定める事業の区分と同一の区分ごとに登録を受けている者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）が端末機器（同法第五十三条第一項に規定する端末機器をいい、当該登録を受けている区分に係るものに限る。次項において同じ。）について技術基準適合認定（同条第一項に規定する技術基準適合認定をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を行った場合には、当該技術基準適合認定を登録認定機関（同条第一項に規定する登録認定機関をいう。以下この条において同じ。）がした技術基準適合認定と、当該登録外国適合性評価機関による技術基準適合認定を受けた者を登録認定機関による技術基準適合認定を受けた者とそれぞれみなして、同法第五十三条第二項、第五十四条、第五十五条第一項、第六十二条第一項、第百六十六条第二項並びに第百六十七条第一項、第二項及び第五項の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第五十三条第二項中「登録認定機関」とあるのは「特定機器に係る適合性評価手続の結果の外国との相互承認の実施に関する法律（平成十三年法律第百十一号）第三十一条第一項前段に規定する登録外国適合性評価機関」と、「付さなければならない」とあるのは「付すことができる」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 33 (1) When a registered foreign conformity assessment body (limited to those who have been registered in each of the same classifications of business listed in Article 38-2 paragraph (1) of the Radio Act as a person to certify that radio equipment conforms to the technical standards prescribed in Chapter III of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) issues a technical standards conformity certification (technical standards conformity certification prescribed in Article 38-2 paragraph (1) of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) in respect of the specified radio equipment (specified radio equipment prescribed in the same paragraph, provided that such radio equipment pertains to the classification in which the registered conformity assessment body has been registered; the same shall apply in paragraph (2)), the provisions of Article 38-7 paragraph (1), Article 38-20 paragraph (1), Article 38-21 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 38-22 paragraph (1), Article 38-23 paragraph (1) and Article 38-30 paragraph (1) (including the penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied by regarding the technical standards conformity certification as a technical standards conformity certification issued by a registered certification body (registered certification body prescribed in Article 38-5 paragraph (1) of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and the person who has obtained the technical standards conformity certification from the registered foreign conformity assessment body as a person who has obtained a technical standards conformity certification from a registered certification body. In this case, the term "registered certification body" and the term "shall affix" in Article 38-7 paragraph (1) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "registered foreign conformity assessment body prescribed in the first sentence in Article 33 paragraph (1) of the Act for Implementation of the Mutual Recognition between Japan and Foreign States in Relation to Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures of Specified Equipment (Act No. 111, 2001)" and "may affix," respectively. Other necessary technical replacement shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第三十三条　登録外国適合性評価機関（電波法第三章に定める技術基準に適合している旨の証明を行う者として同法第三十八条の二第一項に掲げる事業の区分と同一の区分ごとに登録を受けている者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）が特定無線設備（同項に規定する特定無線設備をいい、当該登録を受けている区分に係るものに限る。次項において同じ。）について技術基準適合証明（同法第三十八条の二第一項に規定する技術基準適合証明をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を行った場合には、当該技術基準適合証明を登録証明機関（同法第三十八条の五第一項に規定する登録証明機関をいう。以下この条において同じ。）がした技術基準適合証明と、当該登録外国適合性評価機関による技術基準適合証明を受けた者を登録証明機関による技術基準適合証明を受けた者とそれぞれみなして、同法第三十八条の七第一項、第三十八条の二十第一項、第三十八条の二十一第一項及び第二項、第三十八条の二十二第一項、第三十八条の二十三第一項並びに第三十八条の三十第一項の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第三十八条の七第一項中「登録証明機関」とあるのは「特定機器に係る適合性評価手続の結果の外国との相互承認の実施に関する法律（平成十三年法律第百十一号）第三十三条第一項前段に規定する登録外国適合性評価機関」と、「付さなければならない」とあるのは「付すことができる」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム