Call this an investment.とは 意味・読み方・使い方

Call this an investment.例文帳に追加

これは投資と捉えてください。 - 旅行・ビジネス英会話翻訳例文

(i) if the Limited Partner reasonably determines that the contribution under the Capital Call Notice for such Portfolio Investment probably will result in its violation of any law, rule or regulation or its internal investment policies (limited to those policies that it has notified the General Partner of at the time of its admission to the Partnership) or any other material adverse effect on it and such Limited Partner requests that the General Partner discharge it from the obligation to make such contribution; provided that the Limited Partner shall (I)(a) give a written notice of its request under item (i) of this paragraph and (b) submit an opinion of legal counsel (such legal counsel and contents of its opinion shall be reasonably satisfactory to the General Partner and address the Limited Partner’s determination under item (i) of this paragraph), to the General Partner within [__] days from receipt of the Capital Call Notice (or any later date as the General Partner determines in its discretion), and (II) provide any other information regarding the probability of a material adverse effect as the General Partner reasonably requests; or発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

① 当該有限責任組合員が、当該ポートフォリオ投資に係る追加出資請求通知において示された出資をなすことが、当該有限責任組合員に対し、法令又は投資に関する内部規則（但し、本組合加入時に無限責任組合員に通知されたものに限る。）の違反その他の重大な悪影響を生じさせる蓋然性があると合理的に判断し、無限責任組合員に対して出資義務の免除を請求した場合。但し、当該有限責任組合員が出資義務を免れるためには、当該有限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)無限責任組合員に対し、当該追加出資請求通知の到達の日から［ ］日以内（又はその後の日で無限責任組合員がその裁量により決定する日まで）に、(1)本項第①号に基づく請求を行う旨書面により通知し、(2)法律顧問の意見書（当該法律顧問及び意見書の内容は無限責任組合員が合理的に満足できるもので、本項第①号に定める趣旨の、有限責任組合員の判断に関するものでなければならない。）を提出し、かつ、(ⅱ)無限責任組合員が合理的に要求する、当該重大な悪影響を生じさせる蓋然性についてのその他の情報を提供しなければならない。 - 経済産業省

(4) The provisions of Article 90-2 and Article 91 of this Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the organizer(s) call an Organizational Meeting; the provisions of Article 68, paragraph (5) through paragraph (7), the main clause of Article 72, paragraph (1), Article 73, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4), Article 74 through Article 83, and Article 93, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of an Investment Corporation; and the provisions of Article 830, Article 831, Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Article 836, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 837, Article 838, Article 846, and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to sub-item (g) of item (i)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of absence or an invalidation of a resolution adopted at an Organizational Meeting of an Investment Corporation or an action seeking rescission of such resolution. In this case, the phrase "shall give public notice of the date of the Investors' meeting no later than two months prior to that date, and shall send notice thereof in writing to the Investors more than two weeks prior to that date" in Article 91, paragraph (1) of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall send notice of the date of the Investors' meeting no later than two weeks prior to that date," the phrase "item (v) of Article 27, or item (i) of Article 59(3)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 67, paragraph (1), item (xvi) or Article 71, paragraph (4), item (i) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 68, paragraph (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "item (ii) of Article 67(1)" in Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 68(3)" in Article 74, paragraph (4) and Article 76, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 67 and Article 68" in Article 80 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1) and Article 91, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "the court" in Article 81, paragraph (4) and Article 82, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the phrase "The Directors at Incorporation" in Article 93, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Corporate Officer(s) at Establishment and Supervisory Officers at Establishment," the terms "the preceding paragraph" in Article 93, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act and "paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 73, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

４　第九十条の二及び第九十一条の規定は設立企画人が創立総会を招集する場合について、会社法第六十八条第五項から第七項まで、第七十二条第一項本文、第七十三条第一項及び第四項、第七十四条から第八十三条まで並びに第九十三条第二項及び第三項の規定は投資法人の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条、第八百三十一条、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項、第八百三十七条、第八百三十八条、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）の規定は投資法人の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第九十一条第一項中「二月前までに当該日を公告し、当該日の二週間」とあるのは「二週間」と、同法第六十八条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「投資法人法第六十七条第一項第十六号又は第七十一条第四項第一号」と、同条第七項中「第一項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十一条第一項」と、同法第七十三条第四項中「第六十七条第一項第二号」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十条の二第一項第二号」と、同法第七十四条第四項及び第七十六条第二項中「第六十八条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十一条第二項」と、同法第八十条中「第六十七条及び第六十八条」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十条の二第一項及び第九十一条第一項から第三項まで」と、同法第八十一条第四項及び第八十二条第四項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同法第九十三条第二項及び第三項中「設立時取締役」とあるのは「設立時執行役員及び設立時監督役員」と、同条第二項中「前項」とあり、及び同条第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム