Anti Romanとは 意味・読み方・使い方

語源

From anti- +‎ Roman.

形容詞

antiRoman (comparative more antiRoman, superlative most antiRoman)

1. Pertaining to a person who, or a concept which, was against the Roman Empire.
   • 1999 March 31, leland palmer, “Re: Christ NOT Paul's invention!”, in alt.bible, Usenet, message-ID <3702A72F.F3B694FE@proaxis.com>:

     Paul's silence about JC as a political rebel speaks volumes. It is simply implausible, if JC had been killed as an antiRoman rebel, that this would not have appeared anywhere in Paul. Paul gives not the slightest hint, in all of his words of dissent from the Jerusalem Church, that the Jerusalem group believed in Jesus as a warrior messiah unjustly crucified on a Roman political charge.

   • 2000 April 8, le cri d'merlin, “Re: The (In?)validity of the Bible (Was: A Question For Bruce Morgen)”, in alt.religion.gnostic, Usenet, message-ID <38F002C7.F6016D77@proaxis.com>:

     > What makes you feel that Paul distorted Christ's teachings? First, how / Perennial question. Some (e.g.,Robert Eisenman) argue that the original movement was a "pure" Jewish messianism, with Yeshua being an antiRoman military royalist rebel king - then Paul came along with his so-called "spiritual" gospel which suppressed the politically charged message of Palestinian Jewish Christianity in order to make it palatable to gentiles.

   • 2001 September 7, Rev Gadfly, “Re: YOU HAVE THE BURDEN if you make the extraordinary claim”, in alt.bible, Usenet, message-ID <3B98B44A.E42E9212@netscape.net>:

     Eusebius, who probably interpolated the forgeries in Josephus is also the crank who complied the first mass order of bibles for the pagan Emperor Constantine who inspected them before passing them on. You can be sure any antiRoman ideas were quickly erased from the scriptures and worst, things like Romans 13 may have been written by Eusebius to please his paymaster.

   • 2004 December 24, francis, “Re: Interests....”, in uk.religion.pagan, Usenet, message-ID <XQdQTSM+QHzBFwVZ@topdeck.demon.co.uk>:

     Paul, when he comes into the frame, is a Roman citizen and the Christianity he preaches is a Romanised religion linked very much with the beginning of the Empire. (And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus .. Luke 2.1) So, how come a Jewish [antiRoman] Messiah could lead His people against the Romans and, at the same time, be the founder of a Judeo-Romanic religion?