1016万例文収録!

「のうけっかんせいにんちしょう」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(281ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索


小窓モード

プレミアム

ログイン
設定

設定

Weblio 辞書 > 英和辞典・和英辞典 > のうけっかんせいにんちしょうの意味・解説 > のうけっかんせいにんちしょうに関連した英語例文

セーフサーチ:オン

不適切な検索結果を除外する

不適切な検索結果を除外しない

セーフサーチについて

のうけっかんせいにんちしょうの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方

該当件数 : 14011



例文

4 種類株式発行会社において、募集新株予約権の目的である株式の種類の全部又は一部が譲渡制限株式であるときは、当該募集新株予約権に関する募集事項の決定は、当該種類の株式を目的とする募集新株予約権を引き受ける者の募集について当該種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会の決議を要しない旨の定款の定めがある場合を除き、当該種類株主総会の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる種類株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

(4) For a Company with Class Shares, if some or all classes of the shares underlying the Share Options for Subscription are Shares with Restriction on Transfer, the determination of the Subscription Requirements regarding such Share Options for Subscription shall not become effective without a resolution of the relevant Class Meeting, except in cases where there is a provision in the articles of incorporation to the effect that, with respect to the solicitation of subscribers for Share Options for Subscription for which the underlying shares are such class shares, a resolution of the Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of such class is not required; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where there is no Class Shareholder who can exercise his/her voting right at such Class Meeting.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

8 会社法第百四十二条第一項及び第二項(指定買取人による買取りの通知)の規定は指定買取人について、同法第百四十三条第二項(譲渡等承認請求の撤回)の規定は第四項第一号ハ又は第二号ハの請求をした譲渡等承認請求者について、同法第百四十四条第一項から第六項まで(売買価格の決定)、第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十条(第六号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定はこの項において準用する同法第百四十二条第一項の規定による通知があった場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第百四十二条第一項中「第百四十条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同法第百四十四条第一項及び第四項から第六項までの規定中「対象株式」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項に規定する特定出資」と、「第百四十条第一項第二号」とあるのは「第百四十二条第一項第二号」と、同条第一項、第二項及び第六項中「株式会社」とあるのは「指定買取人」と、同条第五項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第六項中「第百四十一条第二項」とあるのは「第百四十二条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 142(1) and (2) (Designated Purchaser's Notice to Purchase) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Designated Purchaser, the provisions of Article 143(2) (Withdrawal of Requests for Approval of Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Requester for Approval of Transfer who makes the request set forth in paragraph (4)(i)(c) or paragraph (4)(ii)(c), and the provisions of Article 144(1) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Sale Price), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (vi)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a notice has been given under the provisions of Article 142(1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "Article 140(4)" in Article 142(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act," the terms "per share" and "Stock Company" in Article 142(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit" and "Specific Purpose Company," respectively, the terms "Subject Shares" and "Article 140(1)(ii)" in Article 144(1) and (4) to (6) inclusive of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity prescribed in Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 142(1)(ii)," respectively, the term "Stock Company" in Article 144(1), (2), and (6) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Designated Purchaser," the term "per share" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit," the term "Article 141(2)" in Article 144(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 142(2)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十二条 前条の規定の適用がある場合における電気通信事業法第五十三条第三項、第五十五条第二項、第六十条第二項、第六十二条第四項、第六十九条第一項、第百六十六条第七項及び第八項、第百六十七条第三項、第百六十八条並びに第百七十一条の規定(同法第五十三条第三項の規定に係る罰則を含む。)の適用については、同法第五十三条第三項中「第百四条第四項において準用する場合」とあるのは「第百四条第四項において準用する場合及び特定機器に係る適合性評価手続の結果の外国との相互承認の実施に関する法律(平成十三年法律第百十一号。以下「相互承認実施法」という。)第三十一条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用される場合」と、「第百四条第七項において準用する場合」とあるのは「第百四条第七項において準用する場合及び相互承認実施法第三十一条第二項の規定により適用される場合」と、同法第六十九条第一項中「第百四条第四項において準用する場合」とあるのは「第百四条第四項において準用する場合及び相互承認実施法第三十一条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用される場合」と、「第百四条第七項において準用する場合」とあるのは「第百四条第七項において準用する場合及び相互承認実施法第三十一条第二項の規定により適用される場合」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 32 With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 53 paragraph (3), Article 55 paragraph (2), Article 60 paragraph (2), Article 62 paragraph (4), Article 69 paragraph (1), Article 166 paragraph (7) and paragraph (8), Article 167 paragraph (3), Article 168 and Article 171 of the Telecommunications Business Act (including the penal provisions pertaining to Article 53 paragraph (3) of the same act) where the provisions of Article 31 are applied, the term "the cases where the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 104 paragraph (4)" in Article 53 paragraph (3) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the cases where the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 104 paragraph (4) and the cases where the preceding paragraph shall apply with the replacement pursuant to the provision of Article 31 paragraph (1) of the Act for Implementation of the Mutual Recognition between Japan and Foreign States in Relation to Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures of Specified Equipment (Act No. 111, 2001); hereinafter referred to as "the Mutual Recognition Implementation Act")" ; the term "the cases where Article 58 shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 104 paragraph (7)" in Article 53 paragraph (3) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the cases where Article 58 shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 104 paragraph (7) and the cases where Article 58 shall apply pursuant to the provision of Article 31 paragraph (2) of the Mutual Recognition Implementation Act" ; the term "the cases where Article 53 paragraph (2) shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 104 paragraph (4)" in Article 69 paragraph (1) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the cases where Article 53 paragraph (2) shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 104 paragraph (4) and the cases where Article 53 paragraph (2) shall apply with the replacement pursuant to the provision of Article 31 paragraph (1) of the Mutual Recognition Implementation Act" ; and the term "the cases where Article 58 shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 104 paragraph (7)" in Article 69 paragraph (1) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the cases where Article 58 shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 104 paragraph (7) and the cases where Article 58 shall apply pursuant to the provision of Article 31 paragraph (2) of the Mutual Recognition Implementation Act." Other necessary technical replacement shall be stipulated by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 職員が、任命権者の要請に応じ特別職に属する国家公務員、地方公務員又は公庫の予算及び決算に関する法律(昭和二十六年法律第九十九号)第一条に規定する公庫その他その業務が国の事務若しくは事業と密接な関連を有する法人のうち人事院規則で定めるものに使用される者(以下この項において「特別職国家公務員等」という。)となるため退職し、引き続き特別職国家公務員等として在職した後、引き続いて当該退職を前提として職員として採用された場合(一の特別職国家公務員等として在職した後、引き続き一以上の特別職国家公務員等として在職し、引き続いて当該退職を前提として職員として採用された場合を含む。)において、当該退職までの引き続く職員としての在職期間(当該退職前に同様の退職(以下この項において「先の退職」という。)、特別職国家公務員等としての在職及び職員としての採用がある場合には、当該先の退職までの引き続く職員としての在職期間を含む。以下この項において「要請に応じた退職前の在職期間」という。)中に前項各号のいずれかに該当したときは、これに対し同項に規定する懲戒処分を行うことができる。職員が、第八十一条の四第一項又は第八十一条の五第一項の規定により採用された場合において、定年退職者等となつた日までの引き続く職員としての在職期間(要請に応じた退職前の在職期間を含む。)又は第八十一条の四第一項若しくは第八十一条の五第一項の規定によりかつて採用されて職員として在職していた期間中に前項各号のいずれかに該当したときも、同様とする。例文帳に追加

(2) When an official leaves government position, upon the request of an appointer to be a national public servant in the special service, a local public officer, or an employee of a public financial corporation as provided for in Article 1 of the Act on Budget and Settlement of Public Financial Corporations (Act No. 99 of 1951), or any other juridical person provided for by rules of the National Personnel Authority among those whose business is related closely to national affairs or undertakings (hereinafter referred to as "a national public servant in the special service, etc." in this paragraph), and then, after holding office without interruption as a national public servant in the special service, etc., is employed without interruption as an official on premise of the said leaving of government position (including the case of an official who holds one or more offices without interruption as a national public servant in the special service, etc. after holding another office as a national public servant in the special service, etc., and then is employed as an official on the premise of the said leaving of government position), in the cases where, during the continuous period of holding office as an official up to the said leaving of government position (in the case of an official who leaves government position similarly (hereinafter referred to as "the previous leaving of government position" in this paragraph) before the said leaving of government position, holds office as a national public servant in the special service, etc., and is employed as an official, including the continuous period of holding office as an official up to the previous leaving of government position, hereinafter referred to as "the period of holding office before leaving of government position responding to the request" in this paragraph), he/she falls under any of the items in the preceding paragraph, any of the disciplinary actions provided for in the same paragraph may be taken. When an official who is employed pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 of Article 81-4 or paragraph 1 of Article 81-5 falls under any of the items of the preceding paragraph during the continuous period of holding office as an official up to the day when he/she has become a person who has mandatorily retired, etc. (including the period of holding office before leaving of government position responding to the request), or the period that he/she has held office as an official after the employment pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 of Article 81-4 or paragraph 1 of Article 81-5, the same shall apply as well.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

第二百十六条 簡易再生の決定があった場合には、第六十七条第四項、第四章第三節、第百五十七条、第百五十九条、第百六十四条第二項後段、第百六十九条、第百七十一条、第百七十八条から第百八十条まで、第百八十一条第一項及び第二項、第百八十五条(第百八十九条第八項、第百九十条第二項及び第百九十五条第七項において準用する場合を含む。)、第百八十六条第三項及び第四項、第百八十七条、第二百条第二項及び第四項並びに第二百五条第二項の規定は、適用しない。例文帳に追加

Article 216 (1) Where an order of simplified rehabilitation is made, the following provisions shall not apply: Article 67(4), Chapter IV, Section 3, Article 157, Article 159, the second sentence of Article 164(2), Article 169, Article 171, Article 178 to Article 180, Article 181(1) and (2), Article 185 (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 189(8), Article 190(2) and Article 195(7)), Article 186(3) and (4), Article 187, Article 200(2) and (4) and Article 205(2).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム


例文

第三十四条 前条の規定の適用がある場合における電波法第四条(第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。)、第十三条第二項、第十五条、第二十七条の二、第二十七条の十八第一項、第三十八条の七第二項及び第三項、第三十八条の二十第二項、第三十八条の二十一第三項、第三十八条の二十二第二項、第三十八条の二十三第二項、第三十八条の二十八第二項、第三十八条の三十第四項、第七章、第九十九条の二並びに第百三条の二第十一項及び第十七項から第二十五項までの規定(これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。)の適用については、同法第四条第二号中「第三十八条の三十一第四項において準用する場合」とあるのは「第三十八条の三十一第四項において準用する場合及び特定機器に係る適合性評価手続の結果の外国との相互承認の実施に関する法律(平成十三年法律第百十一号。以下「相互承認実施法」という。)第三十三条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用される場合」と、「第三十八条の三十一第六項において準用する場合」とあるのは「第三十八条の三十一第六項において準用する場合及び相互承認実施法第三十三条第二項の規定により適用される場合」と、同法第三十八条の七第二項及び第三項中「第三十八条の三十一第四項において準用する場合」とあるのは「第三十八条の三十一第四項において準用する場合及び相互承認実施法第三十三条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用される場合」と、「第三十八条の三十一第六項において準用する場合」とあるのは「第三十八条の三十一第六項において準用する場合及び相互承認実施法第三十三条第二項の規定により適用される場合」と、同法第百三条の二第十一項中「第三十八条の二十六(外国取扱業者に適用される場合を除く。)」とあるのは「第三十八条の二十六(外国取扱業者に適用される場合を除く。)、相互承認実施法第三十三条第二項の規定により適用される第三十八条の二十六(外国取扱業者に適用される場合を除く。)」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 34 With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 4 (limited to the part concerning item (ii) and item (iii)), Article 13 paragraph (2), Article 15, Article 27-2, Article 27-18 paragraph (1), Article 38-7 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3), Article 38-20 paragraph (2), Article 38-21 paragraph (3), Article 38-22 paragraph (2), Article 38-23 paragraph (2), Article 38-28 paragraph (2), Article 38-30 paragraph (4), Chapter VII, Article 99-2 and Article 103-2 paragraph (11) and paragraph (17) through paragraph (25) of the Radio Act (including the penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) where the provision of Article 33 are applied, the term "the cases where Article 38-7 paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38-31 paragraph (4)" in Article 4 item (ii) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the cases where Article 38-7 paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38-31 paragraph (4) and the cases where Article 38-7 paragraph (1) shall apply with the replacement pursuant to the provision of Article 33 paragraph (1) of the Act for Implementation of the Mutual Recognition between Japan and Foreign States in Relation to Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures of Specified Equipment (Act No. 111, 2001; hereinafter referred to as "the Mutual Recognition Implementation Act")" ; the term "the cases where Article 38-26 shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38-31 paragraph (6)" in Article 4 item (ii) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the cases where Article 38-26 shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38-31 paragraph (6) and the cases where Article 38-26 shall apply pursuant to the provision of Article 33 paragraph (2) of the Mutual Recognition Implementation Act; the term "the cases where paragraph (1) of this Article shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38-31 paragraph (4)" in Article 38-7 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the cases where paragraph (1) of this Article shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38-31 paragraph (4) and the cases where paragraph (1) of this Article shall apply with the replacement pursuant to the provision of Article 33 paragraph (1) of the Mutual Recognition Implementation Act" ; the term "the cases where Article 38-26 shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38-31 paragraph (6)" in Article 38-7 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the cases where Article 38-26 shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38-31 paragraph (6) and the cases where Article 38-26 shall apply pursuant to the provision of Article 33 paragraph (2) of the Mutual Recognition Implementation Act" ; and the term "Article 38-26 (except the cases applied to foreign dealers)" in Article 103-2 paragraph (11) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38-26 (except the cases applied to foreign dealers) and Article 38-26 applied pursuant to the provision of Article 33 paragraph (2) of the Mutual Recognition Implementation Act (except the cases applied to foreign dealers)." Other necessary technical replacement shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

ロ 執行裁判所の執行処分に対する執行異議の申立て、民事執行法第十三条第一項の代理人の選任の許可を求める申立て、執行文の付与の申立てに関する処分に対する異議の申立て、同法第三十六条第一項若しくは第三項の規定による強制執行の停止若しくは続行を命じ、若しくは執行処分の取消しを命ずる裁判を求める申立て、同法第四十一条第二項の規定による特別代理人の選任の申立て、同法第四十七条第四項若しくは第四十九条第五項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立て、執行裁判所に対する配当要求、同法第五十五条第一項の規定による売却のための保全処分若しくは同条第五項の規定によるその取消し若しくは変更の申立て、同法第五十六条第一項の規定による地代等の代払の許可を求める申立て、同法第六十二条第三項若しくは第六十四条第六項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立て、同法第六十八条の二第一項の規定による買受けの申出をした差押債権者のための保全処分の申立て、同法第七十七条第一項の規定による最高価買受申出人若しくは買受人のための保全処分の申立て、同法第七十八条第六項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立て、同法第八十三条第一項の規定による不動産の引渡命令の申立て、同法第百十五条第一項の規定による船舶国籍証書等の引渡命令の申立て、同法第百十七条第一項の規定による強制競売の手続の取消しの申立て、同法第百十八条第一項の規定による船舶の航行の許可を求める申立て、同法第百二十七条第一項の規定による差押物の引渡命令の申立て、少額訴訟債権執行の手続における裁判所書記官の執行処分に対する執行異議の申立て、少額訴訟債権執行の手続における裁判所書記官に対する配当要求、同法第百六十七条の十五第三項の規定による申立て、同法第百七十二条第二項の規定による申立て、同法第百八十七条第一項の規定による担保不動産競売の開始決定前の保全処分若しくは同条第四項の規定によるその取消しの申立て又は同法第百九十条第二項の動産競売の開始の許可の申立て例文帳に追加

(b) The filing of an objection to a disposition of execution by the executing court, a petition seeking permission for the appointment of an agent set forth in Article 13, paragraph (1) of the Civil Execution Act, an objection to a disposition concerning a petition for a grant of a certificate of execution, a petition for a judicial decision ordering a stay or a continuation of a compulsory execution or ordering a revocation of a disposition of execution under the provisions of Article 36, paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of said Act, a petition for appointment of a special agent under the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (2) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 47, paragraph (4) or Article 49, paragraph (5) of said Act, a demand for liquidation distribution by the executing court, a petition for a temporary restraining order on a sale under the provisions of Article 55, paragraph (1) of said Act or for a revocation or change of such an order under the provisions of paragraph (5) of said Article, a petition for permission to pay rent on land, etc. in place of the obligor under the provisions of Article 56, paragraph (1) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 62, paragraph (3) or Article 64, paragraph (6) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order for an obligee effecting a seizure who has made a purchase offer under the provisions of Article 68-2, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order for the highest purchase price offeror or the purchaser under the provisions of Article 77, paragraph (1) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 78, paragraph (6) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver real property under the provisions of Article 83, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver the certificate of a vessel's nationality, etc. under the provisions of Article 115, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for the rescission of a compulsory auction procedure under the provisions of Article 117, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for permission for navigation of a vessel under the provisions of Article 118, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver seized property under the provisions of Article 127, paragraph (1) of said Act; an objection to a disposition of execution by a court clerk in the procedure of executing a claim relating to a small claim action, a demand on a court clerk for liquidation distribution during the process of executing a claim relating to a small claim action, a petition under the provisions of Article 167-15, paragraph (3) of said Act, a petition under the provisions of Article 172, paragraph (2) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order prior to a commencement order for a secured real property auction under Article 187, paragraph (1) of said Act or for revocation of such an order under the provisions of Article 187, paragraph (4), or a petition for permission to commence an auction of movables as set forth in Article 190, paragraph (2) of said Act  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

3 会社法第六十七条第一項(創立総会の招集の決定)、第六十八条(第二項各号及び第五項から第七項までを除く。)(創立総会の招集の通知)、第七十条、第七十一条(創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第七十四条から第七十六条まで(議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第七十八条から第八十条まで(発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議)、第八十一条第一項から第三項まで(議事録)及び第三百十六条第一項(株主総会に提出された資料等の調査)の規定は保険契約者総会について、同法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は保険契約者総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「発起人」とあるのは「組織変更をする株式会社」と、「設立時株主」とあるのは「保険契約者」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、同法第六十八条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第七十四条第六項中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「保険契約者、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、保険契約者、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 67, paragraph (1) (Determination to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding the items in paragraph (2) and paragraphs (5) to (7) inclusive) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 81, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive (Minutes) and Article 316, paragraph (1) (Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the policyholders meeting; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of the policyholders meeting. In this case, the terms "incorporators", "shareholders at incorporation" and "Stock Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "converting Stock Company," "policyholders" and "Mutual Company," respectively; the term "in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "head office" in Article 74, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "shareholders" in Article 74, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "policyholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, Policyholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

6 会社法第六十七条(創立総会の招集の決定)、第六十八条(第二項各号を除く。)(創立総会の招集の通知)、第七十条、第七十一条(創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第七十三条第四項(創立総会の決議)、第七十四条から第七十六条まで(議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第七十八条から第八十条まで(発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議)及び第八十一条(第四項を除く。)(議事録)の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定(同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。)中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主(創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。)」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間(前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間(当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間))」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役(保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。)若しくは設立時監査役(同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

第四十九条 会社法第二百九十六条(株主総会の招集)、第二百九十八条(第二項及び第三項を除く。)(株主総会の招集の決定)、第二百九十九条(第二項各号を除く。)(株主総会の招集の通知)、第三百条(招集手続の省略)、第三百十一条(書面による議決権の行使)、第三百十二条(電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで(取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議)及び第三百十八条(第五項を除く。)(議事録)の規定は、相互会社の総代会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、これらの規定(同法第二百九十八条第一項(各号を除く。)及び第四項、第三百十一条第四項、第三百十二条第五項、第三百十四条並びに第三百十八条第四項を除く。)中「株主」とあるのは「総代」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時総代会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、同法第二百九十八条第一項(各号を除く。)及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間(前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間(当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間))」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百十一条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十四条中「株主から」とあるのは「総代から」と、「株主の共同」とあるのは「社員の共同」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同条第四項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 49 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding paragraph (2), items (i) and (ii)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 (Omission of Calling Procedures), Article 311 (Voting in Writing), Article 312 (Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment) and Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "shareholder" in those provisions (excluding Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding items), Article 298, paragraph (4), Article 311, paragraph (4), Article 312, paragraph (5), Article 314 and Article 318, paragraph (4)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" and "shareholder" in Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding the items) and Article 298, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "member or general representative," respectively; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "shareholders" in Article 311, paragraph (4) and Article 312, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the terms "by the shareholders" and "common interest of the shareholders" in Article 314 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "by the general representatives" and "common interest of the general representatives," respectively; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "shareholders" in Article 318, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

第二百四十九条 信託法第百十四条(議決権の代理行使)、第百十七条(議決権の不統一行使)、第百十八条第二項(受託者の出席等)、第百十九条(延期又は続行の決議)及び第百二十条(議事録)並びに会社法第三百十四条(取締役等の説明義務)、第三百十五条(議長の権限)、第七百三十一条(第一項を除く。)(議事録)、第七百三十二条から第七百三十五条まで(社債権者集会の決議の認可の申立て、社債権者集会の決議の不認可、社債権者集会の決議の効力、社債権者集会の決議の認可又は不認可の決定の公告)及び第七百三十八条(代表社債権者等の解任等)の規定は、権利者集会について準用する。この場合において、信託法第百十九条中「第百八条及び第百九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百四十二条」と、会社法第三百十四条中「取締役、会計参与、監査役及び執行役」とあるのは「受託信託会社等」と、同法第七百三十一条第二項中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「受託信託会社等」と、同条第三項中「社債管理者及び社債権者」とあるのは「代表権利者、特定信託管理者及び各受益証券の権利者」と、「社債発行会社」とあるのは「受託信託会社等」と、同法第七百三十三条第一号中「第六百七十六条の募集」とあるのは「受益証券の募集」と、「当該社債発行会社」とあるのは「受託信託会社等」と、同法第七百三十五条中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「受託信託会社等」と、同法第七百三十八条中「代表社債権者若しくは決議執行者」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百四十六条第一項の決議により定めた者」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 249 (1) The provisions of Article 114 (Proxy Voting), Article 117 (Inconsistent Voting), Article 118(2) (Attendance of Beneficiaries, etc.), Article 119 (Resolutions for Postponement or Continuation), and Article 120 (Minutes of a Meeting) of the Trust Act and the provisions of Article 314 (Accountability of the Directors, etc.), Article 315 (Authority of the Chairperson), Article 731 (excluding paragraph (1)) (Minutes of a Meeting), Articles 732 to 735 inclusive (Petitions for Approval of Resolutions Made at Bondholders' Meetings; Rejection of Resolutions Made at Bondholders' Meetings; Effectiveness of Resolutions Made at Bondholders' Meetings; Public Notice of Rulings Approving or Rejecting Resolutions Made at Bondholders' Meetings), and Article 738 (Dismissal of Representative Bondholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meetings. In this case, the phrase "Article 108 and Article 109" in Article 119 of the Trust Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 242 of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "a director, an accounting advisor, a company auditor or an executive officer" in Article 314 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Fiduciary Trust Company, etc.," the term "bond-issuing Company" in Article 731(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Fiduciary Trust Company, etc.," the phrase "The bond manager and bondholders" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Representative Beneficiary Certificate Holder, the Specified Trust Administrator, and each Beneficiary Certificate Holder," the term "Bond-issuing Company" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Fiduciary Trust Company, etc.," the phrase "the solicitation in Article 676" in Article 733(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the solicitation for Beneficiary Certificates," the term "such bond-issuing Company" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Fiduciary Trust Company, etc.," the term "bond-issuing Company" in Article 735 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Fiduciary Trust Company, etc.," the phrase "the representative bondholders or Resolution Administrator" in Article 738 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person specified by the resolution set forth in Article 246(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

索引トップ用語の索引



  
日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する
英→日 日→英
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する

©2024 GRAS Group, Inc.RSS