「時間がかかる」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(59ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

２　事業主は、その雇用する労働者のうち、その要介護状態にある対象家族を介護する労働者に関して、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、労働者の申出に基づく連続する九十三日の期間（当該労働者の雇入れの日から当該連続する期間の初日の前日までの期間における介護休業等日数が一以上である場合にあっては、九十三日から当該介護休業等日数を差し引いた日数の期間とし、当該労働者が当該対象家族の当該要介護状態について介護休業をしたことがある場合にあっては、当該連続する期間は、当該対象家族の当該要介護状態について開始された最初の介護休業に係る介護休業開始予定日とされた日から起算した連続する期間のうち当該労働者が介護休業をしない期間とする。）以上の期間における勤務時間の短縮その他の当該労働者が就業しつつその要介護状態にある対象家族を介護することを容易にするための措置を講じなければならない。例文帳に追加

(2) An employer shall, pursuant to Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, with regard to an employed worker who takes care of a Subject Family Member in Care-requiring Condition, take measures that facilitate the worker to take care of the Subject Family Member in Care-requiring Condition while continuing working, such as shortening of working hours, for a period exceeding 93 consecutive days upon application from the worker (or a period which is obtained by subtracting from 93 days the Number of Days for Family Care Leave, etc., in cases where the worker takes one or more days of Family Care Leave, etc. during the period from the day on which said worker was first employed until the day prior to the first day of said continued period; a period in which the worker did not take Family Care Leave for the Subject Family Member within the continued period from the Family Care Leave Scheduled Start Date for the first Family Care Leave pertaining to said Care-requiring Condition of the Subject Family Member, in cases where said worker has taken Family Care Leave for said Care-requiring Condition for the Subject Family Member).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　使用者は、前項の規定により休業補償を行つている労働者と同一の事業場における同種の労働者に対して所定労働時間労働した場合に支払われる通常の賃金の、一月から三月まで、四月から六月まで、七月から九月まで及び十月から十二月までの各区分による期間（以下四半期という。）ごとの一箇月一人当り平均額（常時百人未満の労働者を使用する事業場については、厚生労働省において作成する毎月勤労統計における当該事業場の属する産業に係る毎月きまつて支給する給与の四半期の労働者一人当りの一箇月平均額。以下平均給与額という。）が、当該労働者が業務上負傷し、又は疾病にかかつた日の属する四半期における平均給与額の百分の百二十をこえ、又は百分の八十を下るに至つた場合においては、使用者は、その上昇し又は低下した比率に応じて、その上昇し又は低下するに至つた四半期の次の次の四半期において、前項の規定により当該労働者に対して行つている休業補償の額を改訂し、その改訂をした四半期に属する最初の月から改訂された額により休業補償を行わなければならない。改訂後の休業補償の額の改訂についてもこれに準ずる。例文帳に追加

(2) In the event that the per capita average monthly amount of ordinary wages payable in the period of January through March, April through June, July through September, or October through December, respectively (any such period being referred to hereinafter as a "quarter"), for the number of the prescribed working hours for a worker at the same workplace and engaged in the same type of work as the worker receiving compensation for absence from work pursuant to the preceding paragraph (or, for a workplace where less than 100 workers are ordinarily employed, the average monthly amount during the quarter per worker of compensation paid every month in the industry to which that workplace belongs, as provided in the Monthly Labor Survey compiled by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; hereinafter whichever amount applies shall be referred to as the "average compensation amount") exceeds 120 percent of the average compensation amount during the quarter in which the worker in question suffered the injury or illness in the engagement of the employment, or falls below 80 percent of that same amount, the employer shall adjust the amount of compensation for absence from work which is payable to the worker in question pursuant to the preceding paragraph in accordance with such rate of increase or decrease in the second quarter following the quarter in which the increase or decrease occurred; and the employer shall make compensation for absence from work of such adjusted amount from the first month of the quarter in which such adjustment takes effect. Thereafter, adjustment to the previously adjusted amount of compensation for absence from work shall be made in the same manner.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百八十条の十五　会社法第二編第四章第五節第二款（第三百六十七条、第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項、第三百七十二条第三項並びに第三百七十三条を除く。）（運営）の規定は清算人会設置相互会社の清算人会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第二項（議事録等）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項（取締役会への報告の省略）中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十四第八項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 180-15 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5), Article 372, paragraph (3), and Article 373) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operations of the board of liquidators of a Mutual Company with a board of liquidators; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence ), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or general representative, where the company has a General Meeting)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as set forth in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraph (2) (Omission of report to board of directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 180-14, paragraph (8) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　派遣中の労働者の派遣就業に関しては、派遣先の事業のみを、派遣中の労働者を使用する事業とみなして、労働基準法第七条、第三十二条、第三十二条の二第一項、第三十二条の三、第三十二条の四第一項から第三項まで、第三十三条から第三十五条まで、第三十六条第一項、第四十条、第四十一条、第六十条から第六十三条まで、第六十四条の二、第六十四条の三及び第六十六条から第六十八条までの規定並びに当該規定に基づいて発する命令の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則の規定を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第三十二条の二第一項中「当該事業場に」とあるのは「労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律（以下「労働者派遣法」という。）第四十四条第三項に規定する派遣元の使用者（以下単に「派遣元の使用者」という。）が、当該派遣元の事業（同項に規定する派遣元の事業をいう。以下同じ。）の事業場に」と、同法第三十二条の三中「就業規則その他これに準ずるものにより、」とあるのは「派遣元の使用者が就業規則その他これに準ずるものにより」と、「とした労働者」とあるのは「とした労働者であつて、当該労働者に係る労働者派遣法第二十六条第一項に規定する労働者派遣契約に基づきこの条の規定による労働時間により労働させることができるもの」と、「当該事業場の」とあるのは「派遣元の使用者が、当該派遣元の事業の事業場の」と、同法第三十二条の四第一項及び第二項中「当該事業場に」とあるのは「派遣元の使用者が、当該派遣元の事業の事業場に」と、同法第三十六条第一項中「当該事業場に」とあるのは「派遣元の使用者が、当該派遣元の事業の事業場に」と、「これを行政官庁に」とあるのは「及びこれを行政官庁に」とする。例文帳に追加

(2) With regard to dispatch work performed by a worker under dispatching, the provisions of Article 7, Article 32, paragraph (1) of Article 32-2, Article 32-3, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive of Article 32-4, Articles 33 to 35 inclusive, paragraph (1) of Article 36, Article 40, Article 41, Articles 60 to 63 inclusive, Article 64-2, Article 64-3 and Articles 66 to 68 inclusive of the Labor Standards Act and the provisions of orders based on said provisions (including penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall apply only to the client undertaking, by deeming it to be an undertaking employing a worker under dispatching. In this case, the term "at the workplace" in paragraph (1) of Article 32-2 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "at the workplace of a business of the dispatching undertaking (which means the dispatching undertaking prescribed in the same paragraph; the same shall apply hereinafter), where an employer of the dispatching undertaking prescribed in paragraph (3) of Article 44 of the Act for Securing the Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act") (hereinafter such employer shall be simply referred to as a "dispatching employer")"; the term "pursuant to rules of employment or the equivalent thereof" in Article 32-3 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "pursuant to rules of employment or the equivalent, a dispatching employer"; the term "a worker for whom" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "a worker who can be made to work for working hours under the provisions of Article 26 of the Worker Dispatching Act, based on the worker dispatch contract with regard to the worker concerned under paragraph (1) of the same Article"; the term "at the workplace concerned" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "at the workplace of a business of the dispatching undertaking, where the dispatching employer"; the term "at the workplace " in paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 32-4 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "at the workplace of a business of the dispatching undertaking, where the dispatching employer"; the term "at the workplace" in paragraph (1) of Article 36 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with" at the workplace of a business of the dispatching undertaking, where the dispatching employer"; and the term "this to the relevant government agency " in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "and this to the relevant government agency".  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の十六　会社法第二編第四章第五節第二款（第三百六十七条並びに第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項を除く。）（運営）の規定は相互会社の取締役会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において読み替えて準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百七十一条第二項（議事録等）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項及び第三項（取締役会への報告の省略）中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十三第二項」と、同条第三項中「第四百十七条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十第五項において準用する第四百十七条第四項」と、同法第三百七十三条第一項及び第二項（特別取締役による取締役会の決議）中「第三百六十二条第四項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十四第四項第一号及び第二号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-16 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, and Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5)) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the board of directors of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article with relevant changes in interpretation. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraphs (2) and (3) (Omission of Report to Board of Directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-13, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 417, paragraph (4)" in Article 372, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 417, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-30, paragraph (5) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 362, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii)" in Article 373, paragraphs (1) and (2) (Resolution of board of directors by special directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-14, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム