It's identical to the original.とは 意味・読み方・使い方

However, neither the original text written by Kagefumi himself nor any manuscript essentially identical to it has been found yet.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

ただ、景文の記した原本やそれに限りなく近い写本が発見されていない。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

Where the Patent Office finds that the original copy of the application has been received 30 days after the date of fax transmission or it is not identical with the fax copy, or due to the illegibility of the latter it is impossible to determine the information concerning the disclosure of the invention and the scope of the protection sought, the date of receipt of the original copy shall be considered the actual filing date, which fact shall be confirmed by way of order.例文帳に追加

(3)出願の原本がファックス送信後 30日を過ぎて受領されたこと若しくはそれがファクスの写しと同一でないこと，又は後者の判読不能のために，発明の開示及び求められる保護の範囲に関する情報を確認することが不可能であることを特許庁が認めた場合は，原本の受領日が実際の出願日とみなされ，この事実は命令によって確認される。 - 特許庁

When determining that it becomes the subject server, the file server FS as the origin of copied file and the file server FS as the destination of copied file are selected under designated conditions, and a file identical to the file in which the redundancy is degraded is copied from the original server for copying to the destination server on the basis of this selection.例文帳に追加

主体になると判定した場合には、ファイルのコピー元となるファイルサーバＦＳとコピー先となるファイルサーバＦＳを所定の条件に従って選択し、この選択に基づきコピー元サーバからコピー先サーバに冗長度の低下したファイルと同一のファイルをコピーさせる。 - 特許庁

In examination on a divisional application, where a written statement based on (1) above has not been submitted and the examiner cannot easily determine whether or not the divisional application meets the substantive requirements for division or where it requires considerable time to determine whether or not the claimed inventions of the divisional application are identical to the claimed inventions of the original application or other divisional applications, the examiner may request, pursuant to Article 194(1), that the applicant submit a document explaining the descriptions in the description, claims or drawings of the original application that were changed, and matters described in the description, claims or drawings of the original application as of the filing from which the claimed inventions of the divisional application were derived, as well as the fact that the claimed inventions of the divisional application are not identical to the claimed inventions of the original application or other divisional application.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

審査官は、分割出願の審査において、上記(1)による上申書が提出されていない場合であって、分割出願が分割の実体的要件を満たしているかどうかを簡単に判別できない場合や、分割出願に係る発明が原出願に係る発明や他の分割出願に係る発明と同一でないかどうかの判断に相当の時間を要する場合には、第194条第1項の規定に基づき、出願人に対して、原出願の明細書、特許請求の範囲又は図面のどの記載を変更したのか、原出願の出願当初の明細書、特許請求の範囲又は図面に記載されたどの事項に基づいて分割出願に係る発明としたのか、また分割出願に係る発明が原出願に係る発明や他の分割出願に係る発明と同一でないこと等について説明した書類の提出を求めることができる。 - 特許庁

Where the Patent Office finds that the original copy of the application has been received 30 days after the date on which the transmission of the telefacsimile effected or that it is not identical with the application transmitted by means of telefacsimile, or, because of the telefacsimile copy being illegible, the trademark applied for protection or the list of the goods indicated in the original copy cannot be identified, the date of receipt of the original copy shall be deemed to be the filing date of the trademark application, which fact shall be confirmed by way of order.例文帳に追加

出願の原本がファックスの送信日後 30日を過ぎて受領されたこと若しくはそれがファクスで送信された出願と同一でないこと，又はファックス送信の写しが判読不能のために保護を求めて出願された商標若しくは原本に表示された商品一覧を確認することができないことを特許庁が認めた場合は，原本の受領日が商標出願日とみなされ，この事実は命令によって確認されなければならない。 - 特許庁

Where it is not easy to determine whether the divisional application meets the substantial requirements for division of application, or where it takes a considerable amount of time to determine whether or not the invention claimed in the divisional application is identical to the invention claimed in the original application or to the invention claimed in another divisional application: documents that indicate which part of the descriptions, etc. attached to the original application has been altered or which matters described in the description, claims or drawings as originally filed provide the basis for the invention claimed in the divisional application, or documents that explain that the invention claimed in the divisional application is not identical to the invention claimed in the original application or to the invention claimed in another divisional application発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

分割出願が分割の実体的要件を満たしているかどうかを簡単に判別できない場合や、分割出願に係る発明が原出願に係る発明や他の分割出願に係る発明と同一でないかどうかの判断に相当の時間を要する場合に、原出願の明細書等のどの記載を変更したのか、分割出願に係る発明は原出願の出願当初の明細書、特許請求の範囲又は図面に記載されたどの事項に基づいているのか、分割出願に係る発明が原出願に係る発明や他の分割出願に係る発明と同一でないこと等について説明した書類。 - 特許庁

Where the examiner cannot easily determine whether or not a divisional application meets the substantive requirements for division or where it requires considerable time to determine whether or not the claimed inventions of the divisional application are identical to the claimed inventions of the original application or of other divisional applications, even after careful examination of the content of a written statement submitted based on (1), the examiner may request, pursuant to Article 194(1), that the applicant submits another explanatory document.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

上記(1)による上申書が提出されており審査官がその内容を精査してもなお、分割出願が分割の実体的要件を満たしているかどうかを簡単に判別できない場合や、分割出願に係る発明が原出願に係る発明や他の分割出願に係る発明と同一でないかどうかの判断に相当の時間を要する場合も、第194条第1項の規定に基づき、再度の説明書類の提出を求めることができる。 - 特許庁