「close application」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(3ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(iv) Accepting the consignment of a transaction set forth in Article 2, paragraph 6, item 1 with regard to a Transaction on a Commodity Market from a customer and carrying out a transaction set forth in the same item at an amount of a consideration which is more advantageous than the amount of a consideration for the transaction pertaining to said consignment (which means an amount of a consideration lower than that pertaining to said consignment in the case of buying and an amount of a consideration higher than that pertaining to said consignment in the case of selling) in order to close a transaction identical to the transaction pertaining to said consignment on the Commodity Market pertaining to said consignment based on the Futures Commission Merchant’s own account prior to filing an application for the transaction pertaining to said consignment 例文帳に追加

四商品市場における取引につき、顧客から第二条第八項第一号に掲げる取引の委託を受け、その委託に係る取引の申込みの前に自己の計算においてその委託に係る商品市 場における当該委託に係る取引と同一の取引を成立させることを目的として、当該委託に係る取引における対価の額より有利な対価の額（買付けについては当該委託に係る対価の額より低い対価の額を、売付けについては当該委託に係る対価の額より高い対価の額をいう。）で同号に掲げる取引をすること。 - 経済産業省

Composition X consisting of components (A+B+C) is disclosed in a reference document, if the subject matter of an invention application relates to composition Y (components: A+B), and the claim for composition Y is presented in the close-ended mode, for example, it is described as “consisting of A+B”, the claim possesses novelty even if the technical problem solved by the invention is the same as that of composition X if the claim for composition Y is presented in the open-ended mode as “containing A+B”, and the technical problem solved by the invention is the same as that of composition X, then the claim does not possess novelty; if the exclusive method is used to present the claim of composition Y, i.e., when it is indicated that “C” is not contained in it, the claim possesses novelty. 例文帳に追加

ある対比文献において、成分（A＋B＋C）からなる組成物甲が開示された場合に、もし、発明専利出願は組成物乙（成分はA+B）であり、かつ請求項では「A+Bからなる」のような閉鎖式の記載形式を採用しているなら、当該発明と組成物甲において解決される技術的課題が同一のものであっても、当該請求項は依然として新規性を有する。前記発明の組成物乙の請求項では、「A+Bを含む」のような開放式の記載形式を採用しており、かつ当該発明と組成物甲において解決される技術的課題が同一のものであれば、当該請求項は新規性を有しない。前記発明の組成物乙の請求項で排除法の記載形式が採用されている場合、つまりCを含まないことを示したなら、当該請求項は依然として新規性を有する。 - 特許庁

Article 252 (1) In the following cases concerning the rehabilitation debtor against whom bankruptcy proceedings have not yet been commenced, for the purpose of application of the relevant provisions of the Bankruptcy Act (meaning the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act, Article 71(1)(iv) and (2)(ii) and (iii), Article 72(1)(iv) and (2)(ii) and (iii), Article 160 (excluding paragraph (1)(i)), Article 162 (excluding paragraph (1)(ii)), Article 163(2), Article 164(1) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of said Article), Article 166, and Article 167(2) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 170(2) of said Act); the same shall apply in paragraph (3)), a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, etc. (in cases where an order of dismissal with prejudice on the merits of a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, an order of discontinuance of rehabilitation proceedings, an order of disconfirmation of the rehabilitation plan or an order of revocation of the rehabilitation plan (limited to one based on a petition filed prior to the close of rehabilitation proceedings) becomes final and binding, this phrase refers to a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, petition for commencement of special liquidation in the proceedings for special liquidation that have ceased to be effective as a result of the commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, or any act conducted by the rehabilitation debtor or his/her statutory agent or the rehabilitation debtor's director, executive officer or any other person equivalent thereto, which shall constitute the crime set forth in Article 265 of the Bankruptcy Act, and in cases where an order of revocation of the rehabilitation plan, which is not based on a petition filed prior to the close of rehabilitation proceedings, becomes final and binding, said phrase refers to a petition for revocation of the rehabilitation plan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall be deemed to be a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings only where no petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings has been filed prior to said petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, etc: 例文帳に追加

第二百五十二条　破産手続開始前の再生債務者に関する次に掲げる場合における破産法の関係規定（破産法第七十一条第一項第四号並びに第二項第二号及び第三号、第七十二条第一項第四号並びに第二項第二号及び第三号、第百六十条（第一項第一号を除く。）、第百六十二条（第一項第二号を除く。）、第百六十三条第二項、第百六十四条第一項（同条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第百六十六条並びに第百六十七条第二項（同法第百七十条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定をいう。第三項において同じ。）の適用については、再生手続開始の申立て等（再生手続開始の申立ての棄却、再生手続廃止若しくは再生計画不認可の決定又は再生計画取消しの決定（再生手続の終了前にされた申立てに基づくものに限る。）が確定した場合にあっては再生手続開始の申立て、再生手続開始によって効力を失った特別清算の手続における特別清算開始の申立て又は破産法第二百六十五条の罪に該当することとなる再生債務者、その法定代理人若しくは再生債務者の理事、取締役、執行役若しくはこれらに準ずる者の行為をいい、再生計画取消しの決定であって再生手続の終了前にされた申立てに基づくもの以外のものが確定した場合にあっては再生計画取消しの申立てをいう。以下この項において同じ。）は、当該再生手続開始の申立て等の前に破産手続開始の申立てがないときに限り、破産手続開始の申立てとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム